Public Meetings - Pacific Grove, California

The Pacific Grove City Council held a regular meeting on May 7, 2026 (the transcript indicates the meeting occurred on May 6, but the date provided for this summary is May 7). The agenda included a public hearing on an appeal of a coastal development permit for Crespy Pond vegetation management, establishment of a process to fill a vacant council seat, adoption of a policy for council vacancies, a recommendation to initiate a competitive RFP for solid waste collection services, and installation of a four‑way stop at Congress Central and Lighthouse. All actions were passed, most unanimously, with one dissenting vote on the timeline for filling the vacant seat. Consent Calendar - Approved the agenda as stated and the consent calendar (routine items) unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Christy Metzner, Chamber President and CEO, thanked city staff for a successful Good Old Days weekend, noting over 40 bands/shows, 210 vendors, and support from public works, police, and fire departments. - A resident (name not given) presented analysis of election costs, stating that ballot measures contributed 85% of voter information guide costs ($24,000 of $28,000) and urged realistic cost estimates for future measures. - Nina Beattie (online) argued that U.S. international military actions threaten Pacific Grove’s economy and safety, calling on the city to oppose Pentagon activities and sanctions. - Inga Lawrence (online, later in person) supported the Crespy Pond appeal, criticizing past delays and urging the city to listen to residents. - Residents Sally Moore and Nicholas Morlem supported the four‑way stop at Congress and Lighthouse, citing safety concerns. Inga Lawrence also spoke in favor. - Representatives from waste management companies (Waste Management, Republic Services, Green Waste) and the REGION technical advisory committee chair spoke in support of the RFP process, emphasizing transparency and cost competitiveness. Discussion Items - Crespy Pond Coastal Development Permit Appeal: Appellants Anthony Ciani requested three conditions: work limited to September 1–30, revegetation with native plants, and a qualified biologist monitor. Staff recommended denial, noting that the mitigated negative declaration already addresses impacts, permits from other agencies are pending, and the project is a first step. Council rejected the appeal, agreeing that the current scope is appropriate and a broader restoration could be considered later. - Filling Vacant Council Seat (12a): Council set the application period from May 7 to May 22, 2026 (close of business), with a selection hearing on June 3 and swearing‑in on June 17. Applications with redacted personal info will be posted on a rolling basis. Councilmember Paduri voted no, citing short timeline and potential bias toward future election candidates. Motion passed 4‑1. - Council Vacancy Policy (12b): Staff presented a draft policy for filling future vacancies. Council directed staff to revise the policy to: have each council member nominate only one candidate; include a Q&A period with consistent questions for all applicants; and set applicant speaking time at the time of agenda posting (flexible based on number of applicants). The motion carried unanimously. - REGION Waste Hauler RFP (13a): The Technical Advisory Committee recommended initiating a competitive RFP for solid waste, recycling, and organics collection, with the current contract expiring in 2030. The consultant presented survey results showing 93% satisfaction with Green Waste but high concern about affordability. All five interested haulers expressed desire to bid. Council adopted a resolution to proceed with the RFP and the process integrity policy. Unanimous. - Four‑Way Stop at Congress Central and Lighthouse (13b): Public Works Director Dan Gough presented a staff recommendation to install an all‑way stop at the intersection, based on crash data (5 crashes in 12 months) and heavy pedestrian/bicycle traffic. Traffic commission supported it. Council approved the installation, including refresh of signage and striping, with pedestrian safety improvements to be considered later. Unanimous. Key Outcomes - Denied the appeal of the Crespy Pond coastal development permit and approved the permit with the mitigated negative declaration (5‑0). - Approved application timeline and selection date for vacant council seat (4‑1, Paduri dissenting). - Directed staff to revise the council vacancy policy as outlined (unanimous). - Adopted resolution to initiate competitive RFP for waste hauler services and the accompanying process integrity policy (unanimous). - Approved installation of a four‑way stop at Congress, Central, and Lighthouse, with associated sign and pavement marking upgrades (unanimous).

The City Council held a special study session at 5:00 PM to receive a presentation from Monterey One Water on the Coral Street Pump Station electrical relocation project, followed by a regular meeting at 6:01 PM. The regular meeting included decisions on a housing element update, a concession lease for the golf course restaurant, a code of conduct policy, and direction on filling a vacant council seat. The council also heard a presentation from Montage Health's CEO. Special Study Session: Coral Street Pump Station Electrical Relocation - Matthew Thompson, Director of Engineering at Monterey One Water, presented the project background, explaining that the pump station serves an area generating approximately 500,000 gallons per day and is vulnerable to storm surge flooding. The preferred site is the northeast corner of the municipal golf course, selected after city direction in March 2024. The project includes a small electrical building, emergency generator, and underground duct bank (approximately 1,300 feet). - Thompson noted that 24 comment letters were received on the environmental document (Mitigated Negative Declaration), primarily from neighbors concerned about visual impacts, noise, light pollution, and traffic. Three alternative designs were presented: a lowered roof above-ground building, a partial subterranean vault, and a fully subterranean vault. The fully subterranean option is constrained by bedrock about 10 feet below ground and shallow groundwater. - Public comment was largely opposed to the golf course site. Speakers cited visual impacts, construction disruption, environmental harm to wildlife (great horned owls, herons, deer, etc.), property value loss, and inadequate notification (only 5 homeowners notified via small signs). Several speakers advocated returning to the Esplanade Park site, noting it is $5 million less expensive (approximately $5.7 million vs. over $10 million for the golf course). A legal concern was raised: the golf course is zoned open space, which may prohibit public utility structures even with a use permit. - Council members expressed appreciation for public input, noted questions about alternatives analysis, and underscored the need for better outreach. No decision was made; the session was informational only. Consent Calendar - The council approved the consent agenda (4-0) with no items pulled. Public Comments & Testimony (Regular Meeting) - Jane Haynes and others commented on the cannabis license process, urging that all applicants receive equal chances in the lottery rather than one applicant having eight chances. They warned of potential litigation and costs. - Carl Lindstrom asked whether the code of conduct item related to an existing investigation. - Colleen Ingram urged adoption of a code of conduct with real transparency, graduated penalties, and mandatory public reporting of settlements. - Inga Lawrence opposed the code of conduct, saying it was unnecessary and could be weaponized. Discussion Items 11A – Housing Element Update (Zoning Code Amendments) - John Biggs (Community Development Director) presented amendments required by the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to establish minimum densities of 20 dwelling units per acre in R3, C1, and C2 zones. The amendments apply to multifamily units only, preserving single-family development. An addendum to the certified Environmental Impact Report was provided. The Planning Commission recommended approval in March 2026. - Councilmembers supported the update. The ordinance was adopted (5-0-1, Councilmember Rao absent). 11B – Concession Lease Agreement with Fortunate Fork LLC (Point Pinos Grill) - Nick Sena (staff) summarized the RFP process: released December 15, 2025; two proposals received; Fortunate Fork LLC was recommended based on qualifications and vision. The lease is for five years with two five-year options. Rent is 7% of monthly gross sales, capped at $13,500 per month (growing 3% annually). Operations target mid-June to early July 2026. - Public comment (Paul Dyson) supported the lease but raised concerns about a low security deposit ($11,000) and low liability insurance limits ($1M/$2M). - Council approved the first reading of the ordinance (5-0-1). 12A – Code of Conduct Policy (OO-25) - Mayor Pro Tem Joe Emilio presented a “code of conduct light” based on previous efforts. It includes norms for respectful meetings, working for common good, sharing information, praising in public/criticizing in private, and striving for consensus. A censure provision was included (majority vote of council as a last resort). - Council discussion: Councilmember Garfield suggested separating boards/commissions from council, clarifying ambiguous language, and adding graduated steps before censure. Councilmember McDonald opposed the censure provision, arguing it could create division and that the public is responsible for accountability via elections. Councilmember Paduri supported the policy as a framework that can be refined later. - A motion to approve the recommended action (adopt the policy) was made and seconded. A friendly amendment to remove the censure section was not accepted. A substitute motion to accept temporarily with staff work on language was withdrawn. The original motion carried (4-1, with Councilmember McDonald voting no; Councilmember Rao absent). 13A – Process for Filling Vacant Council Seat - City Attorney Lorca noted the charter requires appointment to fill the vacancy left by Councilmember Walkingstick. The seat is open to all city residents regardless of district. - Mayor Smith proposed discussing the process at the May 6, 2026 meeting, with a timeline for applications and appointment in June. Councilmember Paduri suggested leaving the seat vacant until November but acknowledged the mandatory duty. Councilmembers agreed to meet on May 6 to set the process. - Motion to direct staff to schedule a discussion on May 6 passed (5-0-1). 14A – Montage Health Presentation - Dr. McDermott, CEO, introduced himself and provided updates: Montage Medical Group has 120+ providers, providing 230,000 ambulatory visits in 2025; MOGO urgent care saw 50,000 visits; the system operates at 20+ locations. A new thrombectomy program for stroke care (first in Monterey County) was launched via partnership with UCSF. Montage invested over $1 million in scholarships in 2025 and has a home loan assistance program for staff. Dr. McDermott expressed commitment to community partnership. - Council welcomed the presentation and discussed potential collaboration, including urgent care expansion. No action was taken. Key Outcomes - Coral Street Pump Station Study Session: No decisions; council will consider input. - Housing Element Zoning Amendments: Ordinance adopted (5-0-1). - Concession Lease (Fortunate Fork LLC): First reading approved (5-0-1); second reading scheduled May 6. - Code of Conduct Policy (OO-25): Adopted (4-1). - Vacant Council Seat: Council will discuss the appointment process on May 6, 2026. - Montage Health Presentation: Received; no action.

The Pacific Grove City Council held a regular meeting on Wednesday, March 4, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. in council chambers at 300 Fourth Avenue. The agenda included a presentation, announcements, public comment, a consent agenda, and discussion items on cannabis licensing, budget modifications, the city work plan, and a presentation from Monterey One Water. Consent Calendar - The council approved the consent agenda (excluding item 8A) unanimously. Items included routine approvals and staff reports. Public Comments & Testimony - Peggy Gibbs (CEO/co-founder of PG Cares) reported on the Keep America Beautiful National Summit, highlighting the impact of volunteer efforts and the importance of beautification for community pride and economic vitality. She expressed PG Cares' commitment to working with the city. - Online commenter (name not given) thanked staff for improving comment letter posting procedures, and asked when the rental assistance program (promised by January 2026 in the housing element, page 320) would come before the council. - Amara Morrison (attorney, Redwood Public Law, representing Nug Pacific Grove LLC) requested that the council agendize the cannabis memo for full discussion before the March 30 lottery, or postpone the lottery. She argued that eight of the ten eligible applications are interrelated with common ownership, which the city's ordinance defines as relevant, and that the city's process ignores this definition. - Public comment on Monterey One Water presentation (one speaker opposed the rate increase, citing financial strain; another supported the low-income assistance program). Discussion Items - Item 8A – Storefront Retail Cannabis Business Licensing (Informational) - City Manager Logan stated the item was informational only, providing a history of staff responses to questions about the permitting process. - Councilmember Walkingstick moved to pause the permit award process and agendize an ordinance to prevent application stacking, citing concerns about fairness and that the city's own ordinance does not prohibit stacking. He argued that the council has authority to act on the agenda item. - The city attorney ruled the motion improper because the item was agendized as informational only. - Councilmember Rao questioned staff about the process, appeals, and FAQs. Deputy City Manager Halby confirmed that the city's ordinance does not restrict multiple applications by related parties, and that FAQs clearly stated this. No appeals were received during the 10-day appeal period in January. - Councilmember Garko asked for clarification on how the eight applications are interrelated. Staff noted the alleged interrelationship involves a parent company with applications under individual names, but the city's review found no violation of existing ordinances. - Councilmember Moreau argued that applicants followed the rules, invested significant fees (approximately $64,000 in LLC formation costs plus $10,000 per application), and the lottery should proceed. The mayor closed discussion, noting the item was for information only. - Item 11A – FY 25-26 Mid-Year Budget Modifications - Assistant Director Jessica presented the mid-year update. The originally approved budget projected a $1.9 million operating deficit. Proposed amendments increase revenue by $700,000 (higher property taxes: +$200,000; higher transient occupancy tax: +$500,000, including conservative projections for the Kimpton Hotel) and increase expenditures by $294,000 (Monterey Fire contract true-up, elevator repairs at the youth center). The revised deficit is approximately $1.5 million. The city still meets the 25% general fund reserve requirement. - Staff also proposed reclassifying an associate planner to senior planner with no net cost increase. - Council commended staff for conservative budgeting. A motion to introduce the ordinance for first reading passed unanimously. - Item 12A – Status Update and Review of Work Plan - City Manager Logan presented a detailed update on the two-year work plan: 9 of 27 supporting tasks are complete. Highlights included progress on fiscal sustainability (risk management assessment, fee review), infrastructure (CIP, sidewalk policy, asset database, IT system RFP), and community development (ADU ordinance, affordable housing, water allocation evaluation). - Councilmember Paduri recognized Deputy City Manager Halby's leadership. Councilmember Garfield suggested aligning BCCs more closely with fiscal sustainability goals. Councilmember Rao emphasized the need for technology improvements. Mayor Smith and others asked about specific projects (Sunset roundabout, Lovers Point pier, Chinese pavilion, parking meter retrofit). Staff replied that roundabout and pier are in the CIP; Chinese pavilion design is funded by $200,000 raised by the Mari Bhinese Association; parking meter retrofit proposal expected in April. - The council received the report and offered no further direction. - Monterey One Water Presentation - Executive Officer Paul Shudo presented an overview of Monterey One Water's operations, including its 35-year-old treatment plant, 30 MGD capacity, 60% of potable water demand supplied by Pure Water Monterey expansion (completed October 2025), and a $500 million capital improvement plan over 10 years. He announced a proposed 8% wastewater rate increase (from $54 to $58.32 per month for single-family dwellings) to fund infrastructure renewal. The Proposition 218 process will include a public hearing in June 2026. A low-income customer assistance program has helped 900 customers, but funds ran out for 50 additional applicants. - Councilmember Garfield asked about the Coral Street pump station electrical relocation project. Shudo said the city is considering alternative designs to minimize visual impact after community concerns. Councilmember Paduri and others urged continued affordability measures. Councilmember Garko asked about cost drivers and the 218 protest threshold (50%+1 of customers). - The council thanked Shudo for the presentation. Key Outcomes - Consent agenda approved unanimously (item 8A pulled). - Cannabis licensing (8A): No action taken; the council heard information and public comment. The lottery remains scheduled for March 30, 2026, at 5:00 p.m. - Budget modifications (11A): Ordinance introduced and passed first reading unanimously. Final adoption will occur at a future meeting. - Work plan (12A): Report received; no formal action. - Monterey One Water presentation: received; no council action.

The Pacific Grove City Council held a regular meeting on Wednesday, February 18, 2026, at 6 PM in Council Chambers. The council approved the consent agenda, advanced a ballot measure to increase council stipends to the June 2026 primary election, and authorized a budget amendment for a housing rehabilitation loan. Consent Calendar - Approved 7-0, with no items pulled. Public Comments & Testimony - General Public Comment (Item 4): A speaker urged council to prioritize citizen interests over staff or party loyalty, criticizing raises and taxes. Another speaker objected to the city's partnership with the Xerces Society to glue microwave transmitters on monarch butterflies, calling it harmful and in violation of city ordinance, and requested immediate halt. A third speaker supported better cigarette butt receptacles over ordinances. A fourth speaker criticized the council for not following the city charter's voting requirement (five votes instead of unanimous) regarding the drone urgency ordinance. - Item 11A (Council Stipend Increase): Bill Camp (President of City of Pacific Grove) advocated placing the measure on the ballot to expand candidate pool and ensure contested district elections. A resident opposed the June election timing, citing cost and low turnout, and argued that council should not set its own raise. Carol Marcourt expressed willingness to collect referendum signatures again, urging the measure be placed on the November ballot instead. Another resident criticized the 5% annual increase over 27 years as excessive and fiscally irresponsible, noting staff received only 3% COLAs. - Item 11B (CalHome Loan): No public comment. Discussion Items - Item 11A – Resolution for Special Election on Council Stipend Increase: The council discussed placing a measure on the June 2, 2026 primary ballot (not a special election) to increase council and mayor stipends from $420/month to approximately $1,200/month, adjusted for 27 years of inflation. The increase would take effect at the start of the next term. Council members expressed support, citing the need to attract diverse candidates (including younger and employed individuals) especially with upcoming district elections. They noted that the last raise was 27 years ago, and that PERS/PARS costs are paid by council members, so the net city cost would be about $2,200/year total for Medicare and workers' comp. The city attorney confirmed no automatic escalator is allowed under state law. The ordinance includes a five-year lockout on revisiting the stipend. The measure will appear on the June primary ballot. - Item 11B – Budget Amendment for CalHome Reuse: Staff requested a $199,000 budget amendment from CalHome reserves ($273,986 balance) to fund a housing rehabilitation loan for a qualifying homeowner. The loan is repaid when the property is sold, and the program is self-perpetuating; additional CDBG grant funds are anticipated. Council members praised the program as cost-effective and voted to introduce the ordinance. Key Outcomes - Item 11A: Motion to adopt the resolution (recommendations 1-3) to submit the council stipend increase to the voters at the June 2, 2026 primary election passed 7-0. The ordinance includes a five-year restriction on future adjustments. - Item 11B: Motion to introduce Ordinance No. 25.06 and authorize the budget amendment (recommendations 2 and 4) passed 7-0. - Council Announcements: Councilmember Garfield announced that Pacific Grove received an A rating from the American Lung Association for its smoking ordinance, up from an F six years ago.

The Pacific Grove City Council held a special meeting on Wednesday, February 18, 2026, at 5:01 PM in Council Chambers at City Hall. The meeting was called to order with all council members present, including Councilmember Perderi appearing remotely via Zoom from Chicago and Councilmember Rao participating under the just cause provision of the Brown Act. The sole action taken was approval of the special meeting agenda, followed by a brief public comment period with no participants, after which the council adjourned to closed session. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public spoke in person or online. Key Outcomes - The special meeting agenda was approved unanimously (7-0) via roll call vote. - After closing public comment, the council adjourned to closed session to discuss the two items listed on the special agenda (Items A and B). No details of the closed session were disclosed.

The Pacific Grove City Council convened on December 17, 2025, for a special meeting to deliberate on the 2023-2031 Housing Element Update, which includes amendments to the General Plan's Housing and Health & Safety Elements, as well as necessary zoning and land use map changes. The meeting was conducted in two segments due to a potential conflict of interest regarding Councilmember Rao's property ownership. While the Council received extensive public testimony expressing strong support for regional housing needs and concerns regarding neighborhood character, infrastructure, and notification processes for specific residential rezonings, the Council ultimately moved to certify the Environmental Impact Report (EIR), adopt the Housing Element, and approve the related zoning and land use amendments to maintain local control and avoid state penalties. Consent Calendar - The Consent Calendar, containing routine and non-controversory matters, was approved unanimously with no items pulled by the council or public. Public Comments & Testimony - Speaker Positions: - Supporters: Multiple speakers, including representatives from Landwatch, the Monterey Bay Economic Partnership, the Pacific Grove Chamber of Commerce, and residents, expressed full support for the Housing Element. They argued that adoption is critical to maintain local control, avoid the "builder's remedy" (which could force high-density, non-compliant developments), and address the severe housing affordability crisis affecting service workers and seniors. - Opponents/Concerned Residents: A significant number of residents, particularly those living near the proposed Dennett/Cynex/Grove Acre parcel (Sites 38-41), expressed strong opposition to the specific rezoning to 29 units per acre. Their positions focused on: lack of adequate prior notification (some found out only days before), insufficient infrastructure (narrow streets, lack of sidewalks, poor parking), negative impacts on wildlife corridors and wildlife (specifically butterflies and deer), and concerns that the site was chosen unfairly because of the single owner's development interest while other viable commercial sites were ignored. - Nuanced Views: Several speakers, including a former Planning Commission member and a biologist, acknowledged the need for housing but argued the specific density levels proposed for the residential site were inappropriate and lacked necessary technical studies (e.g., field surveys for biological resources). Others voiced concern that the EIR failed to adequately address traffic, water pressure, and tree impacts specific to the site. Discussion Items - Strategic Necessity: Mayor Smith and Councilmembers Rao, Garfield, and others emphasized that the City is under a state mandate to plan for 1,125 new units. They discussed that failure to adopt the element by the deadline results in the loss of local control, potential fines of up to $100,000 per month, exclusion from state grant funding, and the imposition of the "builder's remedy," where developers could build large, high-density projects anywhere without city input. Councilmember Rao presented an image of a Menlo Park "builder's remedy" project (towers in a residential area) to illustrate the risk of not acting. - Site Selection Debates: Council members Garfield and Rao explained why alternative sites (Mission Laundry, LaPort property) were not selected, citing lack of owner interest, existing citizens' initiatives protecting open spaces, and state approval criteria. They reiterated that the current sites were the only feasible options that met state requirements for density and size while avoiding areas protected by citizen initiatives. - Infrastructure and Process: In response to concerns about narrow streets and lack of infrastructure, Councilmember Rao and Mayor Smith clarified that the zoning change permits future development but does not grant immediate approval for building. They stated that the City would retain control to require specific infrastructure upgrades (widening streets, adding sidewalks, lighting) as part of individual project reviews. They also noted the Council is not in "Builder's Remedy" yet but is in a precarious position where the state's temporary restraining order on water usage might lift soon, making immediate housing element approval crucial. - Affordability Concerns: While the element includes affordable housing goals, Councilmember Garfield noted that the element alone does not guarantee affordability in the market but allows the City to contractually obligate developers through inclusionary housing agreements and binding contracts once local control is restored. Key Outcomes - Environmental Impact Report (EIR): The Council, with Councilmember Rao present (excluding herself from the conflict portion later), voted 6-0 to certify the Final EIR. Councilmember Paduri was absent. - Housing Element Adoption: The Council, with Councilmember Rao present, voted 6-0 to adopt the Resolution certifying the Housing Element and Health & Safety Element updates and the Statement of Overriding Considerations. Minor text corrections to the Land Use Element and page references were requested to be included. - Residential Zoning Amendments: The Council, with Councilmember Rao present, voted 6-0 to introduce the first reading of the ordinance amending Title 23 (Zoning Code) to implement the residential zoning changes (including the R3 density increases). Publication requirements were directed to be satisfied by summary publication. - Recess: The Council took a brief recess to allow Councilmember Rao to recuse herself from the second half of the meeting due to her ownership interest in the 215 Forest Avenue property and the associated commercial zoning amendments. - Land Use Element & Commercial Zoning: Upon reconvening, the Council, with six members present (Councilmember Rao abstained/recused, Paduri absent) voted 5-0 to adopt the Land Use Element and Map amendments unanimously. - Commercial Zoning Ordinance: The Council voted 5-0 (with one abstention due to recusal and one absence) to introduce the first reading of the ordinance amending Title 23, Chapter 23.31, regarding commercial and industrial zoning districts to allow for residential uses and higher densities in commercial zones. - Next Steps: The ordinances are pending final reading and adoption, and the City will submit the complete package to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for final state certification.

The Pacific Grove City Council convened for a regular meeting on Wednesday, November 19, 2025, with all members present. The meeting featured the presentation of a Certificate of Recognition for the late Mr. Richard Stillwell, routine staff and council announcements regarding upcoming holiday events and board applications, and public comments on community topics including Chautauqua Hall fundraising and AI implementation. The council deliberated on three major action items: funding amendments for the Cedar, Congress, and Sunset intersection improvement project, a professional services agreement for community polling regarding revenue measures, and the establishment of a new pension trust to address unfunded liabilities. Consent Calendar - Routine Approvals: The council unanimously approved the consent calendar, excluding Item 9B (Cedar, Congress, and Sunset Intersection Improvement Project), which was pulled for separate discussion. Councilmembers Amelia (motion) and Walkingstick (second) facilitated the motion. Public Comments & Testimony - Chautauqua Hall Fundraiser: Jeannie Anton reported that Hunter Porter Eldridge was selected as the architect for Chautauqua Hall, and the application for National Register of Historic Places status was approved by the State Historical Resources Commission, pending the federal keeper's decision. She thanked donors for quilt raffles and announced a fundraising dinner on January 13th. - AI and City Services: Mike Gibbs advocated for the adoption of AI to enhance economic vitality and city services, highlighting local talent and the efficiency of generative AI in processing contracts and asset management. He urged the council to leverage local "American Ingenuity." - Capital Improvements Status: Andy Kubica requested an update on the approval status for police station roof repairs (approved Nov 5), youth center roof repairs, and city hall door/window replacement, expressing concern over delays during the rainy season. - Heritage Recognition: A resident congratulated the Heritage Society and the council on the successful National Register nomination for Chautauqua Hall, praising the state commissioners' appreciation for humble historical sites. - Cedar, Congress, and Sunset Intersection: - Beth Shamas (Resident): Expressed strong concern regarding pedestrian safety, specifically for students, arguing the proposed roundabout design is not viable for student safety. She highlighted the lack of sidewalks and the danger of trucks speeding down Sunset Drive, suggesting a stop sign as an alternative. - Susan Golbeck (Resident): Opposed the roundabout, stating she had not met a single person who supported it. She argued the project lacks a document validating the need for a roundabout, poses a safety risk if traffic stops suddenly near the refuge island, and exceeds the grant funding by $2 million with no clear source for the deficit. - Mike Gibbs (Resident): Reiterated his opposition, noting that out of 75 residents surveyed, none saw the need for the project. He raised concerns about eminent domain leading to lawsuits and delays, calling the project problematic. - Colleen Ingram (Resident): Requested that the consultant's presentation be made public and inquired about the position of the Pacific Grove Unified School District regarding the project. - Inga Lawrence and Dimer (Resident): Strongly opposed the project, stating that public officials are ignoring community sentiment and that the project is a "huge unfunded bill" that will leave a "mess." - 5-Year Fiscal Forecast & Consultant Hiring: - Anonymous Resident: Expressed concern over the proposal to spend $141,530 on consultants to determine if the city should raise taxes. They argued traditional methods of raising taxes are failing and urged the city to adopt creative alternatives rather than hiring marketing firms. - Mike Gibbs (Resident): Stated that 141,30 is a waste of money to convince residents to tax themselves. He suggested forming a local committee to utilize AI, seek grants, and leverage local wealth rather than hiring consultants. - Andy Kubica (Resident): Opposed the consultant hire, noting that previous consultants yielded recommendations that were ignored. He suggested residents should assist in reducing costs and reviewed ideas such as adjusting TOT rates and vacant storefront plans. - Inga Lawrence and Dimer (Resident): Expressed that her tax tolerance is "zero zilch" and viewed the firm as a marketing firm for tax increases, specifically questioning their history with ballot measures for council stipend increases. She urged fiscal restraint. Discussion Items - Cedar, Congress, and Sunset Intersection (Item 9B): - Staff Position: City Staff (Mr. Go) presented Project Phase 2, requesting amendments to increase funding agreements with the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) by $137,000 and with the engineering firm GHD by $340,000. The project aims to complete a 30% design for a roundabout, addressing pedestrian and bicycle safety, and improving the entire corridor. - Council Discussion: - Councilmember Walkingstick: Expressed that the project is "massively unpopular" and does not address the core issue of child pedestrian safety, moving to disapprove the amendments (motion died for lack of second). - Councilmember Rao: Supported the project as necessary proactive planning for future infrastructure needs, citing the housing element's projection of 1,125 new dwellings and the need to avoid future traffic congestion. - Councilmember Paduri: Expressed full support (100% convinced) that the project will improve safety across the entire corridor and noted the long-term traffic calming benefits of narrowing the street. - Councilmember Garfield: Supported the experts' recommendations, emphasizing the extensive outreach and the importance of safety for pedestrians and cyclists, noting the project is still in the planning phase where designs can be refined. - Councilmember McDonnell: Supported the consensus, emphasizing the need to think about the future as traffic will not slow down, and confirmed the project includes sidewalk improvements to address pedestrian concerns. - Councilmember Amelia (Mayor Pro Tem): Stated she has not yet decided if the roundabout is the right answer but supports continuing the process to address the entire corridor's safety, noting the city retains the option to revert to other alternatives if safety or funding issues arise. - Minimum Wage Ordinance (Item 11A): - Staff Position: Staff recommended amending the salary schedule to comply with the new California minimum wage of $16.90 effective January 1, 2026, with no financial impact to the city's budget. - 5-Year Fiscal Forecast & Consultant Hiring (Item 13B): - Staff Position: Administrative Services Director Fred Marsh presented a five-year forecast showing future deficits driven by inflation, insurance, and pension liabilities. Staff recommended a professional services agreement with "Propositions and Measures" and "True North Research" to conduct scientific polling to gauge community priorities on revenue measures and capital needs. The estimated cost is $141,530 (phased approach: Phase 1 at $53,000). - Council Discussion: - Councilmember Garfield: Inquired about the specific actionable data the consultant would provide and confirmed they would help identify revenue measures based on voter sensitivities. - Councilmember Rao: Questioned the drivers of rising expenditures, citing compensation increases and inflation. - Councilmember Amelia (Mayor Pro Tem): Expressed support for the scientific approach to understanding community wants, noting the value of data over informal staff surveys. - Councilmember McDonnell: Supported the initiative as a vital needs assessment to determine what services the community values most, emphasizing the efficiency of using experts for this specific task. - Councilmember Rao (Follow-up): Emphasized that the survey should determine service priorities first, which then dictate funding needs, not just revenue measures. - Councilmember Walkingstick: Expressed that hiring a professional is necessary to avoid the high financial and political consequences of putting the wrong measures on the ballot. - Pension Trust Establishment (Item 13B - Follow-up): - Staff Position: Director Fred Marsh recommended establishing a pension trust with CalPERS to address the city's $61 million unfunded pension liability. The plan involves dollar-cost averaging $50,000 monthly starting in February, with a target rate of return slightly over 5% (Strategy 1) or 8% (Strategy 2). Contributions are discretionary. - Council Discussion: - Councilmember Garfield: Noted a typo in the agenda report regarding the rate of return for Strategy 2 (corrected to 4.9%) and questioned the choice of CalPERS over PARS, accepting the staff's explanation regarding connectivity issues and fee structures. - Councilmember Rao: Supported the move to steady pension liability trends. - Councilmember McDonnell: Confirmed that contributions are not a fixed legal commitment, providing the city flexibility to address other capital needs if necessary. Key Outcomes - Item 9B (Cedar, Congress, Sunset): Motion to approve the amendments to the Transportation Agency for Monterey County and GHD funding agreements Passed 6-1 (Mayor Pro Tem Amelia, Councilmembers Rao, Garfield, Paduri, McDonnell, and Mayor in favor; Councilmember Walkingstick opposed). - Item 11A (Minimum Wage): Ordinance to amend the salary schedule to comply with the new California minimum wage Passed Unanimously. - Item 13A (Fiscal Forecast/Consultant): Motion to approve the professional services agreement with Propositions and Measures (not to exceed $141,530) Passed Unanimously. - Item 13B (Pension Trust): Motion to adopt the four recommendations to establish the CalPERS Pension Trust Passed Unanimously. - Other Actions: The Consent Calendar (excluding Item 9B) was approved unanimously. - Adjournment: The meeting concluded at the conclusion of the Pension Trust vote.

A special meeting of the Pacific Grove City Council was convened on November 19, 2025, at 5:00 PM. All council members were present. The meeting opened with a motion to convene, which passed without opposition. The agenda focused on a single item concerning the lease of City Parking Lot Number Four for an outdoor dining area. Public comment was offered but yielded no hands raised. Following the brief public portion, the council adjourned to a closed session to proceed with negotiations. Consent Calendar - No items listed on the consent calendar. Public Comments & Testimony - No public members raised hands to provide testimony or comments. Discussion Items - Property Lease Negotiations: The city attorney reviewed the status of City Parking Lot Number Four (168 Forest Avenue). Lisa Wyman was identified as the negotiating party regarding the price and payment terms for leasing a portion of the property to create an outdoor dining area. The council proceeded to closed session to continue these negotiations. Key Outcomes - The council successfully moved to closed session to continue negotiations regarding the lease of City Parking Lot Number Four. - No public votes or directives were recorded prior to the adjournment to closed session.

The Pacific Grove City Council convened on Wednesday, November 5, 2025, at 6:15 PM to address administrative announcements, receive community updates, and deliberate on historic preservation, committee mergers, and public safety surveillance. The meeting featured presentations from county safety officials, the upcoming Kimpton Hotel management, and the Monterey Fire Department regarding leadership transitions and new officer introductions. Significant discussion centered on the proposed merger of the Architecture Review Board (ARB) and Historic Resources Commission (HRC), the constitutionality of historic inventory inclusion without owner consent, and the governance of the Flock license plate reader system. Consent Calendar - The City Council unanimously approved the agenda by voice vote. - The Council unanimously approved the full Consent Agenda, which included routine administrative items, after a motion by Councilmember Amelia and a second by Councilmember Paduri. Public Comments & Testimony - Community Support for Kimpton Hotel: Mr. Mo Amar expressed full support for the Kimpton Hotel project, stating the design fits Pacific Grove's unique character better than "cookie cutter" alternatives and that the project would be a "game changer" for the city. He noted the high-end rates would attract specific demographics while still welcoming all visitors. - Concerns Regarding Monterey Bay Aquarium: Ms. Nina Beattie expressed strong concern and opposition to the Monterey Bay Aquarium's planned sonar surveys (November 11-16), citing the potential to "maim and kill marine life" including otters and dolphins. She urged a boycott of the Aquarium due to these "anti-science" practices and their economic impact on Pacific Grove's tourism. - Objection to Flock System Merger/Expansion: Ms. Helene Ingram expressed caution regarding the Flock License Plate Reader system, raising concerns about potential federal access, data misuse, and the ability of the administration to override 30-day data retention guardrails. She characterized the oversight as a "civil liberties issue" affecting journalists and marginalized communities. - Support for Flock System: Ms. Debbie Beck expressed full support for retaining and potentially expanding the Flock system, citing its instrumental role in solving serious crimes in Carmel and King City and asserting it is a priority for community safety. - General Public Comments: - Ms. Susan Gorbeck thanked the Council and urged attendance at the memorial for Richard Stillwell. - Ms. Lisa Ciani provided a land acknowledgement for the Esselen Nation. - Ms. Jane Haynes requested clarification on the status of the new City Attorney appointment. - Comments on Historic Inventory: Ms. Lisa Ciani opposed Councilmember Garfield's request to codify processes, arguing the current ordinance is "perfectly fine" and stating Pacific Grove should not follow Palo Alto's model of requiring consent. Discussion Items - Safe Streets Together Campaign (Monterey County): Ms. Ariana Green presented a proposal to make Pacific Grove a pilot city for a campaign aimed at long-term traffic behavior change. She stated the campaign would focus on community steering committees. Councilmember Emilio expressed personal support, noting the potential to secure grants for safe routes to schools, though he clarified the city would need to review specifics with staff as no formal action was taken. - City Attorney Appointment Announcement: Councilmember Emilio announced that the City Council has selected a preferred city attorney firm to move forward with a legal services agreement during the closed session. This was noted as a public employee appointment authorized under Government Code 54957. Ms. Jane Haynes requested formal public acknowledgment of this decision. - Fire Department Leadership: Chief Moore was introduced as the new Fire Chief, the first internally promoted since 1980. Chief Matalone's retirement was acknowledged. Three new lateral police officers (Sonny Picasso, Alex Burnaby, Jacob Gonzalez) were introduced as experienced hires. - Fee Resolution (Item 11A): Mr. Biggs presented a resolution to memorialize fees for an outside hearing officer (proposed at $40 for parking, $50 for other citations) and a temporary increase in the potable water discount entitlement to 60% through June 30, 2026. Ms. Dahmer opposed the outsourcing of administrative hearings. - Historic Resources Inventory Consent (Item 12A): - City Attorney Position: Mr. Pearick stated that while California and federal laws require consent for state and national registers, no law requires Pacific Grove to obtain owner consent for local inventory inclusion. He noted that the City Code uses "may" (optional) rather than "shall" (mandatory) for additions. - Councilmember Garfield's Position: Expressed that while the code technically allows inclusion without consent, the process is currently vague. He advocated for codifying the specific steps required to ensure a replicable, systematic evaluation process, regardless of the consent status. - Councilmember Walking Stick's Position: Argued that the current lack of requirement to add properties meeting criteria is beneficial to protect the "stock of historic homes" against owners who might oppose preservation for financial reasons. Stated that changing the structure could lead to the loss of historic inventory as seen in Palo Alto. - Councilmember Paduri's Position: Suggested waiting to evaluate the HRI process until the merger of the ARB and HRC is finalized, arguing that defining the process now is not a priority compared to the committee consolidation. - Public Comment (Ms. Ciani): Argued that the City Attorney misinterpreted the code (specifically the distinction between "may" be added and "shall" determine) and that the city should not limit its ability to add properties to preserve community character. - ARB and HRC Merger (Item 12B): - Staff Proposal: Proposed merging the Architecture Review Board (ARB) and Historic Resources Commission (HRC) into a single 7-member committee to address staffing shortages and streamline processes. The proposed makeup included two construction trades, two design trades, one Heritage Society representative, and two community interest members. - Opposition to Merger: Councilmember Garfield expressed deep concern that the proposed composition might dilute historic preservation expertise, noting that 5 of the 7 potential duties are historic-related. Councilmember Paduri, Ms. Lisa Ciani, and Ms. Kim all argued that merging the two distinct skill sets risks weakening historic preservation and that the city should focus on recruiting more qualified local members rather than combining boards. - Support for Merger: The Mayor and Councilmember Emilio supported the merger as a necessary cost-saving and efficiency measure given the difficulty in staffing two separate boards, suggesting a "try it for a year" approach. - Compromise Discussion: Councilors discussed making the design/construction members potentially non-resident to broaden the applicant pool while maintaining a majority of resident members. There was a consensus that if the merger proceeds, the importance of historic preservation must be explicitly documented in the process guidelines. Key Outcomes - Item 11A (Fees): Unanimously passed. The resolution establishing fees for the hearing officer ($40 parking/$50 other) and the 60% water discount (through June 2026) was approved. - Item 12A (Historic Inventory Process): The Council voted 6-1 to receive the item as a file but directed staff to further elucidate and codify the process for including properties on the Historic Resources Inventory (HRI) to ensure consistency and transparency. - Item 12B (ARB/HRC Merger): The Council voted 5-2 to move forward with combining the Architecture Review Board and Historic Resources Commission. - Vote Count: Aye (Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem Emilio, Councilmember Garfield, Councilmember Paduri, Councilmember Rao), Nay (Councilmember McDonnell, Councilmember Walking Stick). - Directives: The City Manager and Community Development Director are directed to draft ordinance amendments incorporating: 1. A new 7-member commission with five residents and two non-residents (specifically one from construction and one from design trades). 2. An exploration of the criteria and process for HRI inclusion. 3. Language emphasizing the importance of historic preservation within the board's scope. - Closed Session: The Council adjourned to closed session to discuss a conference with legal counsel regarding anticipated litigation. No report of the outcome will be made until the next regular meeting. - Public Announcements: - Richard Stillwell memorial scheduled for November 21st. - Veterans Day event scheduled for November 11th at 11:00 AM at the Lighthouse. - Climate Action and Adaptation Plan to be released for a 30-day public comment period later in the month.