Public Meetings - Prince Georges County, Maryland

The Prince George's County Council convened at 2:04 p.m. on Monday, June 29, 2026, for Legislative Day No. 23. The meeting included public hearings, adoption of resolutions, introduction of bills, and a briefing on the Missing Middle Housing Study. Key actions included enactment of the Apprenticeship Incentive Program, adoption of the FY2027 tax rates, and approval of several resolutions related to housing, fibroid healthcare, agritourism, and transportation grants. The council also introduced a package of clean communities and vacant property enforcement bills. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: Minutes from June 22, 2026, were approved. - First Reading of Bills (Presentation): - CB-068-2026: Supplementary Appropriations for FY2026 (referred to Committee of the Whole). - CB-069-2026: Exempting certain private schools in Rural Residential zones from special exception (referred to PHED). - CB-070-2026: Amending dimensional standards for places of worship (referred to PHED). - CB-071-2026: Revising home occupation and home business regulations (referred to PHED). - Addition to Agenda: CR-066-2026, a resolution for a two-year moratorium on hyperscale data center operations, was introduced and referred to Committee of the Whole. - The consent agenda was adopted by a vote of 8-0 (with three absent). Public Comments & Testimony - Adrienne Jones (District 9 resident) called for an audit of the Department of Public Works and Transportation (DPWT) regarding litter removal, citing that despite spending $6.1 million in FY24 and $9 million in FY23, litter complaints remained high (over 4,000 each year, and over 9,000 in FY25). She argued DPWT is not keeping pace and requested evaluation, efficiency improvements, and accountability standards. - Jenny Tenrue (District 8, Fort Washington) echoed concerns about litter and illegal dumping, emphasizing a lack of investment in the southern part of the county. She questioned budget allocations between DOE and DPWT and urged focus on fundamentals to attract businesses. - Cheryl Cort (Coalition for Smarter Growth, Rise Prince George’s) expressed strong support for the upcoming Missing Middle Housing briefing, praising the planning department’s work and consultant selection. Discussion Items - Missing Middle Housing Study Briefing: - Karen Mierow (M-NCPPC), John Parks, and Josephine Selvakumar, along with consultants Tony Perez (Opticos Design) and Sarah Richards (AECOM), presented key findings and recommendations. The study highlighted that missing middle housing (duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, etc.) makes up only 10% of the county’s housing stock, with a projected supply gap of 12,000 to 25,000 units by 2045. Recommendations included removing density limits for single-family and missing middle zones, calibrating standards, amending building codes, facilitating development on publicly owned land, streamlining review, creating pre-approved plans, launching a public relations campaign, creating a loan fund, and agency collaboration. - Council Member Ivey raised concerns about homeownership versus rentals and maintenance of shared units. Council Member Adams-Stafford inquired about zoning recommendations and coordination with the redevelopment authority. Council Member Burroughs questioned the use of out-of-state consultants (Opticos Design in California) for stakeholder engagement in Prince George’s County, noting he had not been informed and requesting a list of interviewees broken down by council district. Chair Oriadha echoed the value of using local businesses and requested the list. Key Outcomes - Enactment of CB-037-2026 (Apprenticeship Incentive Program): Passed 8-0. Requires Employ Prince George’s to provide incentives to increase apprenticeships in technology, construction, and healthcare. - Adoption of CR-060-2026 (Local Impact Grant Funds Multiyear Plan): Adopted 7-0-1 (Council Member Ivey abstained). Transmits a $4,053,700 plan for youth jobs, scholarships, and community programs. - Public Hearings Held (no testimony): - CR-043-2026: $2.5 million HITF allocation to Holly Place project. - CR-045-2026: $2.5 million HITF allocation to Herman Apartments project. - CR-059-2026: Reprogramming $1.17 million in CDBG funds for Housing Rehabilitation Assistance Program. - Introduction and Adoption of CR-065-2026 (FY2027 Tax Rates): Adopted 8-0 after suspension of rules. Sets property tax rates to balance the FY2027 budget. - Introduction of Bills (Second Reading): - CB-041 to CB-046 (Clean Corridors, Clean Communities Dashboard, Vacant Property Maintenance, Illegal Signage Enforcement, See It Snap It Get Paid, Vacant Properties Tax Rate) were introduced with additional sponsors. - CB-050-2026 (Destination Prince George’s) and CB-060-2026 (Procurement Refinements) introduced. - CB-056-2026 (Reorganization of Enforcement Division) was introduced inadvertently (not in posture for immediate effect). - CB-062-2026 (Prevailing Hours and Wage Rates on Public Works) introduced; held in committee for further discussion. - CB-066-2026 (Supplementary Appropriations for FY2027, $20 million for teacher retirement) introduced. - CB-068-2026 (Supplementary Appropriations for FY2026, $138.28 million) introduced. - Adoption of Resolutions: - CR-030-2026 and CR-031-2026 (Fibroid Healthcare Support and Insurance Access): Adopted 6-0. - CR-039-2026 (Rural Promotion for Agri-Tourism) and CR-040-2026 (Agritourism and Winery Promotion Pilot Program): Adopted with amendments, each 6-0. - CR-061-2026 (Universal Design for Housing Implementation Date Extension): Adopted 6-0, extending the date for multifamily units to October 31, 2026. - CR-029-2026 (2018 Water and Sewer Plan Amendments): Adopted 6-0 after amending to deny one application (Corridor Center) due to access concerns. - CR-046-2026 (FY2027 Transportation Grant Authorization): Adopted 7-0, authorizing DPWT to apply for grants with estimated local matches of $177,500 in operating and $4.5 million in capital funds. - CR-066-2026 (Hyperscale Data Center Moratorium): Removed from the final reading agenda as it remained pending in committee. The meeting recessed at 5:11 p.m. to reconvene for a joint public hearing at 6:00 p.m.

The Transportation, Infrastructure, Energy and Environment Committee of the Prince George's County Council met on Monday, June 29, 2026, at 11:30 AM in Committee Room 2027. The committee considered three legislative items: a water and sewer plan amendment resolution (CR-029-2026), a transportation grant application authorization resolution (CR-046-2026), and a prohibited home business act (CB-048-2026). All three items were voted on, with two approved and one held. CR-029-2026: Water and Sewer Plan Amendments (December 2025 Cycle) This resolution proposed category changes for three properties and 34 map redesignations. Committee staff (Mr. Battle) presented the applications: - 25 PW01 (Parkway/Carter Center): 148 stacked townhomes, 13 villa homes, and 132 townhomes; request to advance from Category 4 to Category 3 for water and sewer. County executive and City of Laurel recommended approval; planning board had no recommendation. - 25 P01 (Frank Tippett Road): Three single-family homes (3,800 sq ft, $670,000); request from Category 5 to Category 4. County executive and planning board recommended approval. - 25 M02 (Allied Brandywine): 200 townhomes (1,969 sq ft, $450,000) plus 9,000 sq ft retail; request from Category 5 to Category 4. County executive and planning board recommended approval. - 34 redesignations in Council Districts 8 and 9, updating maps for properties already connected to the system; county executive recommended approval. Chair Dernoga made a motion to approve the countywide redesignations, 25 M02, and 25 P01, but to deny 25 PW01 (Carter Center). He explained his reasoning at length, citing: - Lack of contiguity and isolation of the Carter Center project, despite being near I-95/Route 198. - Inadequate public facilities: pedestrian access to bus stops exceeds half a mile, with no sidewalks or shelters, contradicting the MXT zone's transit-oriented goals. - A fiscal impact study that only assessed municipal impact, ignoring county costs for schools and infrastructure (e.g., Van Dusen Road and Contee Road issues). - Environmental concerns: proposed clearing of 90% of a 26.65-acre mature forest block, with off-site mitigation uncertain and no guarantee of replacing trees at the same maturity level as required by a 2006 condition. Vote: The motion carried 4–0 (Chair Dernoga, Vice Chair Olson, Councilmember Adams, Councilmember Hunter all in favor). CR-046-2026: Fiscal Year 2027 Federal and State Transportation Grant Application Authorization This resolution authorizes the Director of the Department of Public Works and Transportation (DPW&T) to apply for federal and state transportation grants for FY2027. Committee staff summarized anticipated grants: - FY2026 (current): $1 million in operating grants (requiring $117,500 match) and $45.6 million in capital grants (requiring $10.8 million match). - FY2027 (planned): $1.2 million in operating grants (requiring $138,700 match) and $34.7 million in capital grants (requiring $4.5 million match). Victor Weisberg (DPW&T Special Assistant) and Christy Cluster (Chief Financial Management Division) answered questions. Councilmember Adams asked about grant trends; Ms. Cluster noted that capital grants have tapered off slightly but operating grants remain consistent. Mr. Olson confirmed Title VI compliance. The committee noted a July 1 deadline for the resolution to be adopted by the full Council that afternoon. Vote: Motion to approve passed 4–0. CB-048-2026: Prohibited Home Business Act This bill would establish definitions, civil penalties, and procedures for prohibited home businesses. Committee staff explained that the bill is tied to a related zoning text amendment that has not yet been considered by the Planning, Housing, and Economic Development (PHED) Committee. The zoning bill is expected to be on PHED's July 16 agenda. To align both pieces, the committee moved to hold CB-048-2026. Vote: Motion to hold passed 4–0. Key Outcomes - CR-029-2026 (Water and Sewer Plan): Approved countywide redesignations, 25 M02 (Allied Brandywine), and 25 P01 (Frank Tippett Road); denied 25 PW01 (Carter Center). Vote: 4–0. - CR-046-2026 (Grant Authorization): Approved to enable DPW&T to apply for FY2027 federal and state transportation grants. Vote: 4–0. - CB-048-2026 (Prohibited Home Business): Held pending consideration of related zoning bill. Vote: 4–0. - The committee adjourned, with the next meeting scheduled for Monday, July 6, 2026, at 11:30 AM.

The Government Operations and Fiscal Policy Committee of the Prince George's County Council met on Monday, June 29, 2026, at 11:07 a.m. in Committee Room 2027. The meeting was called to order by Chair Edward Burroughs, with three members present (Burroughs, Vice Chair Timothy Adams, and Council Member Krystal Oriadha) and two absent (Council Members Wala Blegay and Jolene Ivey). The sole legislative item on the agenda was CB-066-2026, a supplementary appropriation to the Fiscal Year 2027 budget. Discussion Items - CB-066-2026 – Supplementary Appropriations: Committee Director Nathaniel Tutt presented the bill, which authorizes an additional $20 million in general fund appropriations from the unassigned fund balance to cover costs not anticipated in the approved FY2027 budget. The total FY2027 General Fund budget increases to $5,025,350,700. The bill has a net neutral fiscal impact because the $20 million expenditure is offset by an equal revenue source from unassigned fund balance. The Office of Law confirmed the legislation is in proper legal form, and the County Executive expressed support. Key Outcomes - Vote: A motion by Chair Burroughs, seconded by Council Member Oriadha, to recommend CB-066-2026 as favorable was passed unanimously (3-0). Council Members Blegay and Ivey were absent and did not vote. The meeting adjourned following the vote.

On 2026-06-29 (June 29, 2026), the Prince George's County Council, sitting as the District Council, and the Prince George's County Planning Board of the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (M-NCPPC) held a joint public hearing on CR-035-2026, a preliminary minor plan amendment (MPA) to the 2013 approved Central Branch Avenue Corridor Revitalization Sector Plan and a proposed concurrent sectional map amendment (SMA). The MPA would codify recommendations from the 2026 Medical Innovation District Feasibility Study and correct sector plan boundaries; the SMA proposes 43 zoning changes across planning areas 76A, 76B, and 81A. The hearing agenda listed a 6:00 p.m. start; the minutes state the meeting was convened at 6:14 p.m. and the joint hearing at 6:11 p.m., with nine council members present. Chair Krystal Oriadha and Council Member Edward Burroughs arrived at 6:19 p.m.; Council Members Wala Blegay and Wanika Fisher were absent. Planning Board Vice-Chair Dr. Billy Okoye and Commissioners Brittany Jenkins and Lori Matthews were present. The public record will remain open until 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, July 14, 2026. Staff Presentation & Procedural Overview - Vice Chair Eric Olson presided and explained that the District Council initiated the MPA and concurrent SMA on May 5, 2026 through CR-035-2026, with notices mailed in May 2026 to property owners affected by proposed zoning changes and a legal ad published in the papers of record. - Michael Calomese, M-NCPPC project manager, presented the staff proposal. He described the 2013 sector plan's six focus areas — Beach Road, Allentown Road, Suitland Road, Camp Springs, Coventry Way, Clinton Commercial Core, and Southern Maryland Hospital Center — and four proposed future Southern Maryland Rapid Transit (SMRT) stations. - Calomese explained that the 2013 plan was adopted without a concurrent SMA. After the county zoning rewrite (2018) and countywide map amendment (2021), the proposed SMA is intended to close the gap between plan policies and zoning on the ground. - The MPA incorporates the 2026 Medical Innovation District Feasibility Study, launched in spring 2025 after 2024 community engagement showed resident support for an innovation district around MedStar Southern Maryland Hospital Center. The study was finalized in 2026 and was informed by land-use and market analyses, institutional interviews, a survey, and open houses. - Staff used a five-step methodology for the SMA: (1) check for approved development applications; (2) follow explicit zoning recommendations in the 2013 plan; (3) reconcile conflicts between approved future land use and existing zoning; (4) avoid creating or resolve non-conforming uses where feasible; and (5) resolve split-zoned properties where feasible. - The proposed 43 zoning changes are intended to concentrate density near future SMRT stations, increase open-space zoning, expand economic development opportunities, and shift from auto-oriented uses toward neighborhood-serving retail. Public Comments & Testimony No elected or appointed officials testified. The following public speakers registered: - Peter Goldsmith, attorney for Lincoln Avenue Communities, requested that 4500 St. Barnabas Road be removed from proposed zoning change BR2 and retain CGO zoning because the proposed CN zone would not allow apartment housing for the elderly. He said Lincoln Avenue is developing a 72-unit senior housing community, Holly Place, in Temple Hills and that the project is midstream; he noted the committee of the whole passed two financing resolutions for Holly Place earlier that day. - Matthew Tedesco, attorney for property owners including 4500 St. Barnabas LLC and MVK Enterprises, aligned with Goldsmith on 4500 St. Barnabas Road and argued the CN zone would narrow permitted uses and reduce long-term economic potential. On behalf of MVK Enterprises, he said the Chem Met Company at 641 Yulkinson Place in Clinton has operated since 1950 and is currently IH-zoned; the proposed CGO zone would make its long-established manufacturing use non-conforming, limiting long-term certainty. He asked that the properties retain their current zoning. - Delanta Harrison, president of the Camp Springs Civic Association, encouraged council members to reach out to civic associations and present the proposal to the community before it becomes widely known, saying things change and community leaders have changed. - Victor Fox, owner of the Kemet Company in Clinton, opposed the proposed CGO rezoning. He said the third-generation business has been at the same location for 76 years, manufactures critical materials for the industrial and defense base, supports local employment, and intends to expand; he called creating non-conforming uses "anti-business" and said the change would put him out of business. - Blady McKispey, speaking with Johnny Marconi for Marconi Motors LLC, opposed the proposed change from commercial services (CS) to commercial general/office (CGO) for a licensed wholesale motor vehicle dealership at 6811 Old Alexandria Ferry Road in Clinton. He said the business has operated since 2018, is in a county approval process to build a new garage, and is surrounded by automotive-related businesses; the rezoning would harm expansion plans. - Alejandra Hogans, owner of property at 6A07 Old Alexandria Ferry Road (as transcribed), opposed the proposed CS-to-CGO change. She said she purchased the property because CS zoning allowed her planned tire shop, that planning staff had told her a tire shop was allowed, and that the change would hurt her women-owned business. - Scott Mona, owner of 7905 and 7915 Malcolm Road in Clinton, supported the proposed CS-to-CGO rezoning for his two office buildings (80,000 square feet, owned and operated by his family for over 40 years). He said CGO would provide flexibility for long-term repositioning and better align with the Branch Avenue corridor. - Blaze Miller, president of BK Miller Meats and Liquors at 9024 Old Branch Avenue, opposed the rezoning. He said the 113-year-old business paid $76,000 in property taxes last year, employs 42 Prince George's County residents, attracts customers from Virginia, DC, and Baltimore, and that his adjacent property at 916 Old Branch Avenue, leased as a cleaners to a young female business owner, would become non-conforming. - Richard Clifton of 9211 Brandywine Road opposed the proposed change from multifamily to single-family zoning. He said the house was built by his father 69 years ago on property from his grandfather B.K. Miller, that townhouses have been approved around it, and that a DPIE letter proposed road widening with two additional lanes. He said the zoning change would make the property 30 to 70 percent less valuable, and he also spoke for his 98-year-old aunt Mary Ann, who lives next door. - Kevin Chen, speaking for his family as owners of 8909 Old Branch Avenue in Clinton, opposed the proposed residential single-family rezoning. He said the family leased the property in October 2025 to Dr. Mark Major of The Medical Home, a physician who made substantial personal and financial investments to open a medical practice; the rezoning would force him to abandon those investments before seeing his first patient. - Abdullah Hijazi, attorney for Czar Sons LLC, opposed the proposed CS-to-CGO change for Zarvo Motors, a family-owned car dealership at 5511 Allentown Road and the corner of Allentown Road and Brown Road. He said the owners purchased the property less than a year ago for $1.6 million, including a $1.2 million loan, a $400,000 deposit, tens of thousands of dollars in renovations, and over $1 million in inventory; the change would make the use non-conforming. He argued there is no need for additional office space in that area and that office use is already permitted under CS. - Ting Chu Tian, owner/landlord of property at 9000 Old Branch Avenue (as transcribed), opposed the change from commercial to commercial neighborhood. He said his business has operated for over ten years and that small business owners in Clinton have invested significant money and effort; he asked why the zoning was being changed. - Sandy Hubbard, a new commercial property owner in Clinton with two salon properties, opposed the proposed CS-to-CGO change. She said the zoning change would increase permits and regulation, harm her small business, and hinder her ability to attract a tenant for a building renovated last year. Discussion Items - Council Member Edward Burroughs (District 8) asked staff whether they had considered presenting the proposal to the Camp Springs Civic Association, saying Camp Springs residents should not miss the opportunity to weigh in. He noted that Camp Springs was originally envisioned as an arts district but ended up with many gas stations, and he offered to work with staff to present the proposed Camp Springs zoning changes to the community so promised development is realized. - Michael Calomese responded that the MPA process was intended as a minor plan amendment, not a reopening of the 2013 plan, but he did not rule out outreach to the civic association. Key Outcomes - The joint public hearing was held; no substantive votes were taken on the MPA or SMA. - The public record will close at 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, July 14, 2026. Written comments may be submitted through the Council's eComment portal, by email, or by fax; testimony is not accepted via social media, U.S. mail, or telephone/voicemail. Speakers in favor of zoning intensification who did not file the required affidavit 30 days before the hearing may still submit an affidavit and written testimony before the record closes. - The Planning Board is expected to hold a work session and take action in September 2026; the District Council will hold a work session in the fall, with final action likely in October 2026. - The meeting adjourned at 7:08 p.m. on a motion by Vice Chair Olson, seconded by Council Member Adams, carried unanimously by the nine members present; Blegay and Fisher were absent.

The Development Review Streamlining Work Group held a public meeting on June 26, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. The group discussed four potential legislative proposals aimed at streamlining the development review process in Prince George's County, while also addressing concerns about transparency, community input, and the composition of the work group itself. No formal votes were taken due to the lack of a quorum; a follow-up meeting was scheduled. Public Comments & Testimony - Greg Smith (identified as a community representative and environmental activist) expressed strong concerns about the work group's mission and composition. He argued that the group's presumption that the process is “too slow” is biased, and that the goal should be "better decisions through a fairer process" rather than merely faster approvals. He highlighted problems with weak notice requirements, lack of transparency, poor databases (at Planning, DPI, and Soil Conservation), and cited a recent project where only a meaningless summary report was posted in the DARTS database days before a hearing. He stated that all of the recommendations in the table would “have a negative impact on transparency and meaningful informed public comment.” He also questioned the lack of comparative data on other jurisdictions' staffing and tools. He noted that only five of 13 members were present and asked about voting procedures. - Malik (another member) defended the work group's composition, saying Greg had “adequately represented the community's interest” and called his contributions valuable. - The Chair (Councilmember) acknowledged Greg's points and proposed running a parallel community-focused work group to address issues of transparency, document uploads, and public engagement. Discussion Items - Development Ombudsman Office – Staff recommended establishing a permanent office to improve interagency collaboration and efficiency. Victoria voiced support, noting it aligns with the state's housing ombudsman, and asked what types of projects would be eligible. Chair responded that the office would be broad, covering coordination, accountability, and policy recommendations. Josh added that this was “low-hanging fruit” to create efficiencies. Greg expressed caution about undue executive intervention and wanted clear rules and authority. - Concurrent Review of Development Applications – The proposal would allow simultaneous review of Natural Resources Inventory (NRI), 100-year floodplain delineation, and Site Development Concept Plan, plus coordination between DPI and the Soil Conservation District (SCD) on stormwater and sediment control. Maureen and Victoria clarified that the current sequential process causes delays; Victoria argued that with professional engineers, floodplain reviews have minimal back-and-forth. She proposed splitting the item: (1) consolidate NRI, floodplain, and site development concept plan into one sequential (concurrent) process, and (2) align DPI and SCD processes to reduce from 2-to-3 separate applications to 2-to-2. Greg countered with examples where such concurrency led to misinformation about approvals, citing a project where the applicant had not actually submitted required stormwater plans despite assurances. He called for better databases and transparency before compressing reviews. - Streamlining Detailed Site Plan and Preliminary Plan of Subdivision – Two companion bills (zoning and subdivision code amendments) would allow combined applications. Victoria strongly advocated, saying this could reduce processing time 30-50% and help the community by reducing confusing, separate hearings. She gave the example of a New Carrollton Metro project where two separate 12-month processes could be combined. Greg expressed concern that early subdivision reviews often ignore major off-site impacts (citing a McDonald's case where off-site context was excluded from Detailed Site Plan review), and worried that collapsing processes without first ensuring adequate review standards and public input would harm transparency. - The Chair summarized that due to time and lack of quorum, no recommendations were voted on. She directed staff to prepare updated recommendation charts based on the discussion and to schedule a follow-up meeting. Key Outcomes - No formal votes were taken; the meeting was informational due to insufficient members for a quorum. - The group will hold a follow-up meeting to continue reviewing the recommendation chart and attempt to formalize a first set of recommendations. - The Chair committed to drafting a separate council resolution to create a community-focused work group addressing transparency, access to information, and document timeliness, parallel to the streamlining work group. - Staff will update the recommendation chart to reflect the parsing of the concurrent review item into two separate proposals (NRI/floodplain/SDCP consolidation and DPI-SCD alignment) and will prepare more details on the ombudsman office concept for the next meeting.

The Prince George's County Council met on Monday, June 22, 2026, for Legislative Day No. 22 in the Council Hearing Room of the Wayne K. Curry Administration Building in Largo, MD. Chair Krystal Oriadha called the meeting to order at 10:55 a.m. and it was adjourned at 12:12 p.m. Ten of the 11 council members were present; Council Member Wala Blegay was absent. The Council approved its consent agenda, introduced five bills on second reading, enacted eight bills, adopted five county charter amendment resolutions for the November 3, 2026 general election ballot, and approved stop-sign monitoring camera programs for New Carrollton and Bladensburg. Opening: Invocation, Pledge, and Public Requests - The invocation was led by Malik Worthy, standing in for Pastor Juan M. Wilder Sr. of Impact One Church (Capitol Heights, MD). Note: the transcript indicates the invocation was delivered by Mr. Worthy standing in for Pastor Wilder, while the minutes credit Pastor Wilder. Council members asked for prayers for Dwayne Stanton (Board of Appeals member, recovering from surgery), staff member Justice Brown-Duso (car accident), candidates in the June 23 primary election, the victims of the June 20 Bowie plane crash in which three men died, longtime Bowie resident Conswela Chapman who recently passed away, Council Member Adams' daughter (car accident), Sheriff John Carr (motorcycle accident), and families in need during difficult economic times. - The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council Member Hunter. - There were no requests from members of the general public to address the Council. Consent Calendar - Approved three sets of meeting minutes: June 8, 2026 (6 p.m.), June 9, 2026, and June 9, 2026 (6 p.m.). - CB-065-2026 (Senior Co-Housing Expansion Program): first reading; referred to the Planning, Housing and Economic Development (PHED) Committee. The agenda listed Council Member Blegay as sponsor; because Blegay was absent, Council Member Fisher presented the bill and is listed as sponsor in the minutes. - CB-066-2026 (Supplementary Appropriations, FY2027): first reading by request of the County Executive; referred to the Government Operations and Fiscal Policy (GOFP) Committee. - CB-067-2026 (Permitting Fees): first reading by request of the County Executive; referred to the Transportation, Infrastructure, Energy and Environment (TIEE) Committee. It consolidates permitting fees into one comprehensive fee table and allows certain sediment and erosion control fees to be set by the Prince George's County Soil Conservation District. - CR-062-2026 (Department of Permitting, Inspections and Enforcement — Fee Increase): introduced by request of the County Executive; referred to TIEE. This resolution requires a public hearing. - CR-063-2026 (2018 Water and Sewer Plan — March 2026 cycle of amendments): introduced by request of the County Executive; referred to TIEE. This resolution requires a public hearing. The cycle includes 7 category change requests in the Western Branch, Piscataway, and Mattawoman sewer basins and redesignation of 4 developed residential properties to reflect existing water and sewer service in Council District 9. - The consent agenda was adopted 9-0 (Blegay and Burroughs absent). Public Comments & Testimony - No member of the public requested to speak, and there were no speakers signed up for any public hearing item. Each public hearing was declared held without testimony. Discussion Items — Second Reading of Bills (Introduction) - CB-032-2026 (Housing and Property Standards for Non-Residential Property): Council Member Dernoga reported that the TIEE Committee voted 3-0 to recommend the bill. Current law imposes a $1,000 fine under Section 13-246; the bill creates a separate schedule for non-residential property owners of $2,000 for a first offense and $5,000 for a second or subsequent offense, leaving residential fines unchanged. The bill was introduced. - CB-033-2026 (Emergency Vehicle Access and Recovery Act): Dernoga reported the TIEE Committee voted 3-0 to recommend the bill as amended. The emergency act provides for redemption of vehicles impounded on posted private property and public/private property by the owner, authorized agent, or family member; requires proof of ownership; requires an indemnification and hold-harmless agreement; prohibits false statements; and sets a $500 penalty. The committee amendment removed language requiring Maryland vehicle registration. The Council read the emergency clause, citing the growing number of county residents detained by federal authorities whose vehicles were left behind and subsequently towed. The bill was introduced. - CB-036-2026 (Women's Health Workplace Protections): Council Member Fisher reported the Public Safety, Health and Human Services (PSHHS) Committee voted 3-0 to recommend the bill as amended. The committee removed language that would have required county contractors to provide accommodations, added definitions to the personnel code, and added a requirement that OHRM notify county employees of existing coverage during Fibroid Awareness Month. The bill was introduced. - CB-049-2026 (Supplementary Appropriations, FY2026): GOFP Director Nathaniel K. Tutt III reported a 3-0 favorable recommendation. The bill adds $4,053,700 in General Fund spending authority — $950,000 in miscellaneous receipts from returned Community Impact Grants (Memorial Library and No Mo Worries) and $3,103,700 from assigned fund balance — increasing the FY2026 General Fund from $4,896,334,900 to $4,900,388,600 to support Local Development Council Community Impact Grants for youth jobs, apprenticeships, scholarships, and other community programs. The bill was introduced. - CB-059-2026 (Supplementary Appropriations, FY2026 Capital Budget): Tutt reported the Committee of the Whole voted 9-0 to recommend the bill. It provides supplemental capital appropriations for the Clean Water Partnership NPDES/MS4, Community Recreation Facility Renovations, and North County Animal Shelter projects with funding that includes $1,000,000 to the Department of Environment (Stormwater), $1,000,000 to the Department of Environment, and $5,000,000 to the Office of Central Services. The fiscal impact was described as positive because the appropriations are supported by grants and other awards. The bill was introduced. Public Hearings — Bills Enacted (Third Reading) - CB-020-2026 (Pre-Application Neighborhood Meetings — Transparency in Land Use): enacted 7-0. Requires the Planning Department to publish a searchable database of informational notifications of pre-application neighborhood meetings and to ensure electronic notifications comply with ADA accessibility guidelines. Council Member Adams-Stafford thanked colleagues for making development more transparent for residents. - CB-031-2026 (Detention Centers): enacted 7-0. Prohibits issuance of a building permit or certificate of occupancy for any detention center. Note: the official minutes and the transcript differ on the roll call — the minutes show Dernoga absent (with Burroughs voting aye) while the transcript shows Dernoga voting aye. Council Member Ivey, who was away for the vote, asked to be recorded in favor and noted support for the bill's general intent. - CB-038-2026 (Impersonation of Utility Companies and Government Agencies): enacted 9-0, with Council Member Adams-Stafford added as a co-sponsor. Council Member Fisher spoke in support, describing the bill as a protection for seniors and county residents being scammed by people impersonating the county government, WSSC, or Pepco. - CB-051-2026 (Community College Facilities bonds): amended and enacted 9-0; authorizes up to $67,306,000 in general obligation bonds, subject to voter referendum. - CB-052-2026 (Public Works and Transportation Facilities bonds): amended and enacted 9-0; authorizes up to $140,089,000, subject to voter referendum. - CB-053-2026 (County Buildings bonds): amended and enacted 9-0; authorizes up to $117,848,000, subject to voter referendum. - CB-054-2026 (Library Facilities bonds): amended and enacted 9-0; authorizes up to $33,656,000, subject to voter referendum. During discussion, Legislative Attorney Kathy Canning and Council Member Fisher explained that the charter requires voter approval of bond issuance and that the six library projects cannot move forward without the bill. - CB-055-2026 (Public Safety Facilities bonds): amended and enacted 9-0; authorizes up to $53,503,000, subject to voter referendum. - Legislative Attorney Kathy Canning explained that the amendments to CB-051 through CB-055 were technical only, required by state law (SB 29) and State Board of Elections guidelines issued June 2, 2026. The amendments add or revise the ballot question's term, type, brief title, and voting choices; the text of the questions and practical outcomes were unchanged. Charter Amendment Resolutions (Final Adoption) All five charter amendment resolutions were amended with the same technical SB 29/State Board of Elections ballot language and adopted for submission to voters at the general election on Tuesday, November 3, 2026. Each required 8 votes. - CR-053-2026 (Section 813 — referendum exemption for taxes and fees): amendment adopted 8-0-2 (Harrison and Ivey abstained); resolution adopted 8-2 (Harrison and Ivey dissenting). The measure would allow the County to impose taxes and fees on operators of businesses deemed to have an adverse impact on community health, safety, welfare, or economic development — including tobacco stores, liquor stores, and self-storage — without a public referendum. Chair Oriadha expressed support, stating that residents should have the power to require such businesses to contribute to the community. The County Executive supported the legislation. - CR-054-2026 (Section 305 — redistricting): Draft 2 was substituted, amended, and adopted 9-0. The amendment provides that if the Council changes the Redistricting Commission's decennial plan, it must do so by bill rather than resolution. - CR-055-2026 (Section 908 — collective bargaining): amended and adopted 9-0. Adds the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service for disputed labor issues. The County Executive supported the legislation. - CR-056-2026 (Section 602 — procurement): Draft 2 was substituted, amended, and adopted 8-0 (Blegay, Burroughs, and Harrison absent). Grants the County Purchasing Agent full signature authority to execute contracts, agreements, and purchase orders and allows joint or cooperative purchasing with other public entities. - CR-057-2026 (Sections 301, 303, 307, 307A — council composition): amendment adopted 8-0-2 (Harrison and Ivey abstained); resolution adopted 8-2 (Harrison and Ivey dissenting). Would repeal at-large council seats and provide for nine district council members, effective for the term beginning in December 2030. Council Member Dernoga noted the change is limited to removing at-large provisions and that existing term limits remain unchanged. Resolutions — Final Reading (Adoption) - CR-034-2026 (Stop Sign Monitoring Systems — City of New Carrollton): adopted 8-0 (Adams-Stafford, Blegay, and Burroughs absent). Approves 100 locations for stop-sign monitoring cameras based on traffic studies. The February 10, 2026 request from Police Chief Linwood Alston indicated the city intends to deploy cameras strategically rather than enforce all locations simultaneously. - CR-037-2026 (Stop Sign Monitoring Systems — Town of Bladensburg): adopted 9-0. Approves 48 locations based on traffic studies, with cameras to be deployed strategically as needed. Other Business - CR-064-2026 (Listing of Local Questions on the 2026 Ballot): introduced (sponsors Oriadha, Dernoga, Adams, and Hunter); the Council suspended the rules and adopted it 9-0. The resolution designates the order and form of local questions on the November 3, 2026 general election ballot. Key Outcomes - Enacted CB-020, CB-031, CB-038, and CB-051 through CB-055 (8 bills), including five bond authorizations totaling $412,402,000 that will appear as referendum questions on the November 3, 2026 ballot. - Adopted five charter amendment resolutions (CR-053 through CR-057) for the November 3, 2026 ballot, all as technical amendments conforming to SB 29 and State Board of Elections guidelines. - Adopted CR-034 and CR-037 (stop-sign monitoring) and CR-064 (2026 ballot listing). - Introduced CB-032, CB-033 (emergency), CB-036, CB-049, and CB-059 on second reading; completed first readings/introductions of CB-065, CB-066, CB-067, CR-062, and CR-063 through the consent agenda. - The County Council will not meet Tuesday, June 23, 2026 (primary election day). Upcoming: TIEE Committee on Thursday, June 25 at 10:00 a.m.; County Council meeting Monday, June 29 at 1:30 p.m. followed by a joint public hearing at 6:00 p.m. on the Minor Plan Amendment to the 2013 Central Branch Avenue Corridor Revitalization Sector Plan & SMA.

The Prince George's County District Council convened on Monday, June 22, 2026, at 10:20 a.m. (delayed from the scheduled 10:00 a.m.) in the Council Hearing Room, with Vice Chair Eric C. Olson presiding. Eight members were present (Olson, Adams-Stafford, Dernoga, Fisher, Harrison, Ivey, Hunter, Adams); three were absent (Chair Oriadha, Blegay, Burroughs). The meeting adjourned at 10:32 a.m. The council considered one zoning map amendment referral, one mandatory review conceptual site plan, and two requests to waive election to review planning board decisions. Approval of Minutes - MINDC 06092026 – The minutes from the June 9, 2026 District Council meeting were approved by an 8–0 vote (motion by Council Member Adams, seconded by Council Member Fisher). Referred for Document (Zoning Map Amendment) - ZMA-2025-003 Melwood Estates – Applicant Day Land Investment, LLC seeks to rezone 27.54 acres from AR (Agricultural-Residential) to RSF-A (Residential, Single-Family Attached) on the east side of Melwood Road, Council District 6. No opposition was recorded. The item had been referred for document on June 9, 2026. Council Member Hunter moved to adopt the prepared zoning order, seconded by Council Member Harrison. The motion carried 8–0. Discussion Item (Mandatory Review) - CSP-24001 Southern Hills – Applicant Southern Hills LLC requests a Conceptual Site Plan for a mixed-use development on 85.4 acres at Southern Avenue and Wheeler Hills Road (Council District 7). The proposal includes 980 multifamily units, 150 senior housing units, 168 townhouse units, and approximately 45,000 square feet of commercial/retail/medical office space. The case was initially waived for review on June 9, but because it is a mandatory review case under Section 27-548.26(b), the council needed to reconsider that waiver. Council Member Fisher moved for reconsideration, seconded by Council Member Adams, to set the case for a mandatory review hearing on Monday, July 13, 2026. The motion carried 8–0. Pending Finality – Planning Board Actions - DPLS-24001 AutoZone 1837 – AutoZone Development, LLC requests a Departure from Parking and Loading Standards for an existing store at Landover Road and Fire House Road (Council District 5). The standard requirement was 123 spaces; after a 15% reduction for landscaping compliance, 105 spaces were required. The applicant sought an additional reduction of 29 spaces, proposing 76 spaces. Council Member Adams-Stafford moved to waive election to review, seconded by Council Member Fisher. The motion carried 8–0. - DSP-2025-0024 Landover Metro – Standard Landover Venture LP requests a Detailed Site Plan for 260 multifamily units on 8.53 acres at Old Landover Road and Pennsy Drive (Council District 5). Council Member Adams-Stafford moved to waive election to review, stating it "is going to be a great step towards bringing new development and more affordable housing into the Landover and Metro area." Council Member Ivey commented, "I do have concerns about the huge number of trees that are going to be taken down as a result of this development. I'll vote aye though." The motion carried 8–0. Key Outcomes - Minutes approved 8–0. - ZMA-2025-003 (Melwood Estates) approved 8–0. - CSP-24001 (Southern Hills) reconsideration approved 8–0; mandatory review hearing scheduled for July 13, 2026. - DPLS-24001 (AutoZone 1837) – Council waived election to review 8–0, allowing Planning Board decision to stand. - DSP-2025-0024 (Landover Metro) – Council waived election to review 8–0, allowing Planning Board decision to stand. - Meeting adjourned at 10:32 a.m. by motion (Fisher/Adams), carried by voice vote.

The Prince George's County Board of Appeals convened virtually on June 17, 2026, at 6:00 PM and adjourned at 6:58 PM. Three members (Chair Bower, Vice Chair Johnston, Board Member Stanton) were present. The board heard three variance cases and approved the minutes from the June 3, 2026 meeting with a correction. Spanish translation was provided for the first two cases. Variance V-1-26: Carlos Perez del Cid and Maria D. Rodriguez Chinchilla - Request: Variances of 9,794 square feet net lot area, 9.9% lot coverage, 1-foot rear and side lot line for a shed, and a waiver for parking area to validate existing conditions and obtain a permit for an unauthorized covered deck, a 12’ x 16’ shed, and a widened concrete driveway at 4407 Sellman Road, Beltsville. - Testimony: Petitioner Carlos Perez del Cid (a home remodeling contractor) stated he built the shed and driveway roof over the deck himself without permits because he believed permits were unnecessary for a small shed and driveway not touching the street. He claimed the deck existed when he purchased the house. Inspector Harrison testified that he visited due to a 311 complaint and found the unauthorized construction; he noted the prior addition on the house also lacked permits but was from a previous owner. The inspector confirmed outstanding fines existed under the previous owner's name. - Position of Petitioner: Petitioner expressed that his actions were unintentional and that his property is large enough not to offend neighbors. - Board Deliberation: Chair Bower noted the property is somewhat unique but concluded the practical difficulty was self-inflicted because the petitioner failed to obtain proper permits. A 311 complaint indicated possible neighbor concerns. - Outcome: Motion to deny (Vice Chair Johnston, second by Member Stanton). Vote: 3-0 to deny. - Post-ruling: Petitioner raised a question about the fine; inspector stated the citation would be reissued in the correct name. Board staff directed petitioner to follow up later. Variance V-17-26: Juan Guzman - Request: Variances of 611 square feet net lot area, 9 feet lot width, and a waiver for parking area to validate existing conditions and obtain a building permit for a proposed 12’ x 20’ driveway partially in front of the house at 1406 Nye Street, Capitol Heights. - Testimony: Petitioner Juan Guzman (who joined while driving, then parked) stated his house is the only one on the street without a driveway; broken windows from parked cars in the street motivated his request. He noted his lot is narrow and unique. - Position of Petitioner: Full support for the variance to improve safety and add driveway. - Board Deliberation: Chair Bower noted the narrow lot and the fact that the property was subdivided in 1950, predating current zoning. No questions from other members. - Outcome: Motion to approve (Member Stanton, second by Vice Chair Johnston). Vote: 3-0 to approve. Variance V-26-26: Jose Tomas and Merlyn Lorena Sorto - Request: Variances of 21,500 square feet net lot area, 50 feet lot width, 7.3% lot coverage, and 8 feet side yard width to validate existing conditions and obtain a building permit for a proposed 38' x 49.6' second-story addition on top of the existing structure and a 12' x 24' first- and second-floor addition at 11601 Daisy Lane, Glenn Dale. - Testimony: Petitioner Jose Tomas Sorto (a general contractor) explained the proposed addition would modernize the house to match newer neighborhood homes. He clarified the plans show a garage in front and the second story addition would be set back. He stated a neighbor (who works at Home Depot) expressed support. The lot has substantial sloping in the back. - Position of Petitioner: Full support for the variance to improve the property. - Board Deliberation: Chair Bower initially questioned how the proposed drawings matched the existing structure but understood after explanation. No concerns from neighboring associations or homeowners. Board noted the sloping lot. - Outcome: Motion to approve (Member Stanton, second by Vice Chair Johnston). Vote: 3-0 to approve. Approval of Minutes from June 3, 2026 - Correction: Board Member Stanton noted Vice Chair Johnston was present at the June 3 meeting but not listed in the draft minutes. The board agreed to record the correction. - Outcome: Motion to approve minutes as amended (Member Stanton, second by Vice Chair Johnston). Vote: 3-0 to approve. Key Outcomes - V-1-26 (Perez del Cid): Denied 3-0. - V-17-26 (Guzman): Approved 3-0. - V-26-26 (Sorto): Approved 3-0. - Minutes of June 3, 2026: Approved as amended (3-0).

The fourth meeting of the Streamlining Development Review Work Group was held on June 11, 2026, from approximately 1:15 PM to 3:00 PM. Members discussed the first draft of recommendations, debated the need for additional data and input from the Planning Department and Council Chair Oriada, and reviewed several specific proposals. No formal votes were taken, but several items were left for consideration at a future meeting. Discussion Items - Committee Composition and Data Needs - Mr. Smith raised concerns that the work group is heavily weighted toward the development community, with limited representation from civic, environmental, or public health groups. He argued that the group lacks sufficient data on why reviews take longer in Prince George's County compared to other jurisdictions, including staffing levels, applicant errors, and remand impacts. - Ms. Camp and Ms. Baristolo suggested waiting for input from the Planning Department and Council Chair Oriada before finalizing recommendations, especially given potential budget cuts to park and planning capacity. - Mr. Tedesco noted that the committee was statutorily created to streamline the process, and the composition is outside the group's control. - Ms. McNeil provided anecdotal evidence that remands can add six months to project timelines, even when no application deficiencies exist. - Combined Preliminary Plan and Detailed Site Plan Application - Mr. Villegas and Mr. Tedesco proposed allowing preliminary plans and detailed site plans to be submitted as a single combined application, rather than just concurrent filings. They argued that the new subdivision regulations have created overlapping requirements that could be consolidated. - Several members (Mr. Villegas, Mr. Tedesco, Mr. Benton, and others) expressed support. Mr. Smith raised concerns about collapsing public review steps and cited a court case that distinguished planning and zoning processes. Mr. Villegas responded that the current code has already blended those processes, making consolidation appropriate. - No decision was made; the item was left for consideration. - Natural Resource Inventory (NRI) and Floodplain Delineation Review - The recommendation proposed allowing NRI review to begin while floodplain delineation is under review, rather than requiring sequential approval. Mr. Jim Campbell initially questioned the logic, but Mr. Alex clarified that currently an approved floodplain delineation by DPI is required before Park and Planning will accept an NRI application, causing delays. - Mr. Smith asked about public notice and transparency implications. Others argued this would streamline the process without harming public input. Mr. Smith did not take a firm position pending more information. - The item was left for consideration. - Pre-Application Requirements – Conceptual Boundary Exhibits and Mailing Lists - The recommendation proposed accepting conceptual boundary exhibits instead of finalized surveys for pre-application review and releasing mailing lists earlier to allow concurrent community outreach. Mr. Alex noted that a final boundary survey can take three to six months, delaying case numbers and community notification. - Mr. Smith questioned neighborhood meeting timing, but others argued this would accelerate early outreach without sacrificing meaningful information. - The item was left for consideration. - Document Posting and Future Meetings - Mr. Smith noted that many presentations from staff were not posted on the council's website. The facilitator acknowledged the issue and promised to email the documents and upload them. - The group agreed to hold at least two more meetings. The next meeting will include Council Chair Oriada. Key Outcomes - No formal votes or decisions were made. All discussed recommendations were left “for consideration” pending further review and input from Council Chair Oriada and the Planning Department. - The facilitator will compile duplicate recommendations and circulate an updated list via email. - The next work group meeting is scheduled for the following week (date not specified) with the expectation that Council Chair Oriada will attend. - Documents from the Planning Department will be posted to the council website as soon as technical issues are resolved. - The group will continue to review recommendations and may hold a voting session on June 24, 2026, though this was not confirmed.