Public Meetings - San Antonio, Texas

The San Antonio City Council met on October 8, 2026, from 9:00 AM to 1:39 PM. The meeting included proclamations, approval of the consent agenda, a detailed discussion and vote on SAWS rate adjustments for 2027–2030, and a resolution requesting utility and city department assessments for a proposed ICE detention facility on the east side. Proclamations and Recognitions - Indigenous Peoples Day: Mayor Jones proclaimed October 12, 2026 as Indigenous Peoples Day. Speakers from the Texas Indigenous Council highlighted indigenous heritage and resilience. - LGBTQ+ History Month and LGBTQ+ Veterans Month: Proclamations read by Mayor Jones. Speakers included Octavia Harris (30-year Navy veteran), Sophia Sepulveda (Equality Texas), Ashramides (drag king), and Monique Fontaine (Miss TransUniverse), who emphasized the importance of recognizing LGBTQ+ contributions and the 15th anniversary of the repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell. - Filipino American History Month: Proclamation read by Mayor Jones. Nicolette and others celebrated Filipino American culture, contributions, and upcoming events including the Adobo Throwdown. - Personal Privilege: Councilman Galvan honored Sue Hadlaila Hernandez, an H-E-B sample worker who served the community for 20 years. A letter from her family was read, reflecting on her kindness and impact. Consent Calendar - Items 6 through 12 were approved unanimously with no discussion. Highlights included a construction contract for a splash pad at Woodlawn Lake Park (part of $8 million investment), a $166,600 FAA grant for the airport, and appointments to youth and zoning boards. Public Comments & Testimony On Item 4 (SAWS Rate Adjustments): - Paul Basaldua (Metro SA Chamber) expressed strong support for the rate plan, citing strategic investments and a $27.5 million reduction in revenue requirements. - Antonio Diaz opposed the increase, arguing that commercial interests receive abatements while residential rates rise. - Jack Finger opposed the plan, highlighting that the 6-7% annual increase is 2-3 times inflation and questioned CEO compensation and the city's 4% gross revenue fee from SAWS. On Item 5 (ICE Detention Center Assessment): - Carolina Canizales (Immigrant Legal Resource Center) urged a multi-agency assessment and highlighted ICE's rank as 4 in arrests nationally. - Alejandra Lopez (San Antonio Alliance of Teachers) opposed the facility, noting it would be near schools and harm immigrant families. - Priscilla Olivares (ILRC) cited estimated water use of 36–82 million gallons per year and wastewater impacts. - Sarah Cruz (ACLU of Texas) noted ICE owes Bexar County $2.2 million in unpaid medical bills. - Sister Denise LaRoc described prolonged detention in other ICE facilities. - William Shepherd urged legal action and warned against legally insufficient environmental assessments. - Erica Galindo (District 5 resident) called for reporting on SAPD-ICE collaboration. - Ananda Thomas read testimony about fears of deportation and family separation. - Philip Manna (Alamo Farmsteads) noted zoning violations, including proximity to a park and floodplain. - Antonio Diaz emphasized racial profiling and fear in the community. - Serena Moreno (constituent) pleaded for her children's safety and freedom. - Issa Lee (District 2 constituent) described outreach to residents near the facility. - Jack Finger supported the facility, arguing it enforces immigration law and called the resolution political theater. Discussion Items Item 4: SAWS Rate Adjustments (2027–2030) SAWS CEO Robert Puente and CFO Cecilia Velasquez presented a proposed rate plan with fixed increases of 6.9% in 2027 and 6.5% in 2028, and ranges (min/max) for 2029 and 2030. The average residential bill would rise from $56.68 to $70.13 by 2030 (23.7% cumulative). The Uplift affordability program would expand to 150% of federal poverty level with a 30% participation goal. A five-year capital improvement program of $3 billion was outlined, including $170 million for the Stephen M. Klaus Water Recycling Center and 77 miles of water main replacement. Council debated an amendment to lower the residential rate ceiling by 0.2% in 2029 and 0.4% in 2030, expected to save $6.9 million over two years. SAWS indicated this would require delaying about $45 million in projects but would not touch seven priority projects. The amendment passed on a voice vote with Councilman White dissenting. The main motion as amended then passed; Councilman White and Councilwoman Spears voted no, with others in favor. Item 5: Resolution for ICE Detention Center Assessment Councilman McKee Rodriguez introduced the resolution requesting SAWS and CPS Energy to perform operational and environmental assessments of the proposed 1,500-bed ICE detention facility at 542 Southeast Loop 410. An amendment was adopted to include city departments (police, fire, public works, development services) to analyze impacts on emergency response, infrastructure, and enforcement of city codes. Council debate included strong support from many members citing community fear, legal accountability, and prior ICE failures, while Councilwoman Spears and Councilman White opposed, arguing it exceeds city authority and is political theater. The resolution as amended passed on a voice vote; Councilman White dissented. Key Outcomes - SAWS Rate Plan Approved: The council approved the amended rate plan for 2027–2030, with fixed increases for the first two years and reduced ceilings for years three and four. The Uplift program expansion and automatic enrollment pilot will continue. SAWS will provide regular updates on capital project progress. - ICE Facility Assessment Ordered: The council passed a resolution directing SAWS, CPS Energy, and multiple city departments to assess the impacts of the proposed detention center. Next steps include a follow-up resolution on October 15, 2026, to consider legal action in coordination with community stakeholders. - Consent Agenda Approved: All routine items passed without objection. Vote Tallies: - SAWS amendment (lower ceilings): Passed (voice vote, White dissenting) - SAWS main motion as amended: Passed (White and Spears dissenting) - ICE resolution amendment: Passed (voice vote, White dissenting) - ICE resolution as amended: Passed (voice vote, White dissenting)

The Building Standards Board met on October 8, 2026, from 9:09 AM to 1:06 PM under Chair Kayla Miranda (later Joel Solis) to hear seven dangerous property cases and an emergency demolition report. Votes were taken on each case, resulting in demolition orders for most properties, one upheld violation notice, and a report on 11 emergency demolitions already completed. Consent Calendar - Approval of minutes from previous meeting was moved, seconded, and carried unanimously. Discussion Items 215 Holy Cross Drive (Case 1 – First Hearing) - Presentation: Dangerous Premises Officer Crystal Town recommended demolition for a main and accessory structure citing severe fire damage (December 2023), missing permits, unsafe conditions. The property had 50+ police calls since 2023 (assaults, fires, robberies, vagrants). - Testimony: Officers Anthony Pena and Brandon Evans detailed multiple incidents including squatters, theft of water, and proximity to Loma Park Elementary. - Owner: Mariano Garcia, 75, said his wife died and he lacked resources but hoped his son could help. He opposed demolition and requested time. - Board Decision: Motion to declare a public nuisance, order demolition within 30 days, vacate, secure, clear trash/debris (including inoperable vehicle), and cut utilities. - Vote: 7-0 in favor. 1517 East Crockett Street (Case 2 – Appeal of Violation Notice) - Presentation: Code Supervisor Joseph Martinez presented violation for exterior maintenance (furniture on porch, trash). Owner appealed the issuance of the notice. - Owner: Thomas McVay argued the notice was improper because the bulk pickup was scheduled later, trash came from neighboring H-E-B store, and the officer ignored his calls. He claimed harassment. - Board Decision: Chair clarified the board only could decide if the notice was properly issued, not the underlying violation. Motion to uphold the notice passed. - Vote: Unanimous (no dissent recorded). 723 Virginia Boulevard (Case 3 – First Hearing) - Presentation: Dangerous Premises Officer Carolyn Pelke recommended demolition for a 1910-built main and accessory structure with severe roof, foundation, and wall deterioration. Deconstruction required for main (pre-1950). Owner had inactive permit. - Owner: Hortensia Zapata (via interpreter) said she planned to transfer the property to Hazel Sendable who would evaluate repairs. No documents provided. - Testimony: Hazel Sendable confirmed transfer plans but had no paperwork. - Board Decision: Motion to declare public nuisance, demolish main (deconstruction) and accessory, vacate, secure, clear debris, cut utilities. - Vote: 5-2 (Dr. Linda Lopez Rodriguez and Fred Andes opposed). 826 Peggy Drive (Case 4 – First Hearing) - Presentation: Dangerous Premises Officer (name not given in transcript) recommended demolition for a severely deteriorated 1940-built structure (302 sq ft). Owner not present; son John Biela II represented. - Son: Requested 30 days to proceed with demolition, having submitted a proposal and proof of financial means. - Board Decision: Motion to declare public nuisance, demolish within 30 days, secure, clear debris. No deconstruction requirement (OHP confirmed not eligible). - Vote: 5-1 (Dr. Linda Lopez Rodriguez opposed). 202 Yuma Street (Case 5 – First Hearing) - Presentation: Dangerous Premises Officer Stephanie Sanchez recommended demolition for a structure with collapsed roof, compromised walls and foundation. - Owner: Maria Avila (daughter) stated she wants to demolish the house. - Board Decision: Motion to declare public nuisance, demolish within 30 days, secure, clear debris. - Vote: 6-0. 437 Aaron Street (Case 6 – Reset Hearing) - Presentation: Dangerous Premises Officer Sergio Kinga recommended demolition for a two-story structure and detached garage. Owner (Bedronga International Investments LLC) not present; previous contact indicated they agreed to demolition. - Board Decision: Motion to declare public nuisance, demolish main and accessory within 30 days, secure, clear debris. - Vote: 6-0. 1016 Cecilia Street (Case 7 – First Hearing) - Presentation: Dangerous Premises Officer Rick Ayala recommended demolition for a structure with unlawful additions (metal warehouse, second-story via ladder), electrical hazards, debris. Built 1941, requires deconstruction. Owner Angel Rabago called before hearing requesting a reset, claiming no notice. - Motion to Reset: Failed 3-3. - Owner Absent: Case proceeded. Owner's prior communications (through an attorney) showed knowledge since 2025. - Board Decision: Motion to declare public nuisance, demolish (main deconstruction, accessory demolition), vacate, secure, clear debris, cut utilities. - Vote: 5-1 (Dr. Linda Lopez Rodriguez opposed). Emergency Demolition Report - Development Services Administrator Kathy Rodriguez reported 11 emergency demolitions completed between August 27 and September 26, 2026, due to fires (6 structures) and tree falls (5 structures) in Districts 1, 2, 3, and 5. No board action required. Removed Agenda Item: 123 Harding Place - The accessory structure case was removed because the owner had already demolished it. Key Outcomes - Demolition ordered for: 215 Holy Cross Dr., 723 Virginia Blvd., 826 Peggy Dr., 202 Yuma St., 437 Aaron St., and 1016 Cecilia St. (all within 30 days, with conditions including vacate, utilities cut, and debris removal). - Violation notice upheld for 1517 E. Crockett St. - Request to reset 1016 Cecilia St. denied. - 11 emergency demolitions completed and reported. - Board requested a full board review of deconstruction guidelines and vacant building program policies.

The City of San Antonio held a public hearing on October 8, 2026, beginning at 9:09 AM, to consider three properties cited as dangerous or in violation of city codes. The meeting was chaired by Keila Randa. City staff presented inspection findings and recommendations; property owners and police officers testified. The commission voted on each case. Property 1: 215 Holy Cross Drive (Demolition Recommendation) - Presentation: Cristina Town, dangerous building officer, recommended demolition. The property had been inspected June 11, 2024, and October 21, 2025, with collaborative inspections including police. The owner, Mariano García and Mary T. García, were present. The property did not qualify as historic. Notices were sent, and a conference was held June 18, 2024. No financing or permits were provided. Photos showed extensive fire damage, missing walls, exposed wiring, and debris. The structure was deemed a public health and safety hazard. The estimated cost of eviction was $1,468. The property was also under the city's senior citizen cleanup program. - Police Testimony: Officer Anthony Peña testified that the location had generated over 50 police calls since December 2022, including assaults, fires, mental health incidents, robberies, narcotics, and a dog bite. The house was insecure, allowing transients to enter. Officer Brandon, a neighborhood safety officer, added complaints of trespassing, water theft, and a vehicle used as shelter. The property is within half a mile of an elementary school. - Owner's Statement: Mariano García stated he had lived there since 1975, but after his wife's death two years ago, he gave up. He acknowledged the problems but said he could not afford repairs. He offered to sell if necessary but pleaded for time and assistance. He denied wrongdoing and said transients were responsible. - Motion and Vote: A motion was made to declare the property a public nuisance, order demolition within 30 days, secure the property, remove all debris (including an inoperable vehicle), and disconnect plumbing. The motion passed 7-0. Property 2: 1517 East Crockett Street (Appeal of Code Violation Notice) - Presentation: Supervisor Joseph Martínez cited violations of external maintenance (Section 302.1) and accumulation of rubbish (Section 308.1). The owner, Thomas McVeigh, was present. The first inspection was August 28, 2026. A notice was posted, and an appeal was filed September 17, 2026. Photographs showed debris on the front porch and rear. - Owner's Appeal: Mr. McVeigh argued that the notice was improperly delivered and that the debris originated from a nearby H-E-B supermarket. He claimed harassment and that the city should address the source. He acknowledged receiving the notice but said he had tried to cooperate and was not given adequate time to remedy. He stated the porch items were functional. - Commission Clarification: The chair explained the hearing was only to determine if the notice was properly delivered, not the validity of the violation. Mr. McVeigh confirmed he found the notice on his door several days after it was posted. - Motion and Vote: A motion was made to uphold the actions of the Development Services Department and not dismiss the administrative case. The motion passed with no stated vote tally (apparently unanimous). Property 3: 723 Virginia Boulevard (Demolition and Deconstruction) - Presentation: Officer Caroline Polki recommended demolition for the main structure and deconstruction for the accessory structure (built before 1950). The property was inspected June 12, 2025. Notices were sent, and a conference was held April 27, 2026. The owner on record was Hortensia Zapata, represented by Teresa Zapata. The property was not historic. Photographs showed foundation issues, roof damage, exposed wiring, collapsed ceilings, and deteriorated siding. Utilities were disconnected. No financial plan or permits were provided. The main structure was built in 1910. - Testimony: A representative of the Vacant Buildings Program stated the property was not taken into the program due to fire danger. The property administrator (Jesús Andoli) said the property would be transferred to his name and he would hire someone to evaluate repair or demolition. - Motion and Vote: A motion was made to declare the property a public nuisance, order the main structure to be deconstructed (per city ordinance for pre-1950 buildings), and the accessory structure to be demolished within 30 days. The property was to be evacuated, utilities disconnected, and debris cleaned. The motion passed 5-2. Key Outcomes - 215 Holy Cross Drive: Demolition ordered (7-0). Owner to meet with code officer. - 1517 East Crockett Street: Notice of violation upheld; administrative case continued. - 723 Virginia Boulevard: Main structure ordered deconstructed; accessory demolished; property secured (5-2). - The meeting recessed at 10:00 AM briefly and resumed. Final adjournment around 11:36 AM.

On October 7, 2026, the San Antonio City Council convened to receive a presentation from the Government Affairs Office on the proposed state legislative program for the 90th Texas Legislature and related federal initiatives. The presentation outlined key priorities, the political landscape, and a timeline for adoption, with council members offering comments and questions during the discussion. Discussion Items - Sally, Director of Government Affairs, presented the draft legislative program, emphasizing the need to preserve municipal authority, protect the CPS Energy municipal model, and secure funding for flood control infrastructure (e.g., $3.1 million for Conception Creek, $3.5 million for resilience improvements, and a pending $750 million grant for the Zarzamora corridor). - The presentation noted significant turnover in the legislature (24 new representatives, 5 new senators) and a 3% budget reduction directive from state leadership. - Councilmember Villagran expressed support for proactive collaboration with state partners, emphasizing the importance of infrastructure projects and flexibility to work with various districts. - Councilmember Galván focused on education, data center regulation (preserving local zoning authority), metal theft, and protecting school zones from vape shops. - Councilmember White requested a public dashboard to track the city's positions on legislation and emphasized local control as the core of the city's advocacy. - Councilmember Mesa González highlighted the importance of local flexibility, supporting CPS Energy, and addressing issues like alcohol sales near schools and short-term rentals. - Councilmember Maki Rodríguez stressed flood control investments (411 million for 14 projects) and partnerships with other large cities on housing affordability and workforce development. - Councilmember Munguía raised concerns about public education, flood control, mental health resources, and CPS Energy’s rate affordability. - Multiple council members underscored the need to protect vulnerable populations, including seniors from cryptocurrency fraud, and to oppose discriminatory policies. Key Outcomes - No formal vote was taken; the council will consider adoption of the legislative program at its regular meeting on October 29, 2026. - The council recessed into executive session at 3:16 PM under Texas Government Code for economic development negotiations and real estate matters, reconvening at 5:29 PM with no actions taken. - The Government Affairs Office will provide periodic updates every three weeks during the legislative session, and the city will maintain a public tracking website for its positions.

The Historic and Design Review Commission (HDRC) met on October 7, 2026, to consider 12 consent agenda items and five pulled items, including demolitions, additions, modifications to historic buildings, and signage requests. The meeting was chaired by Acting Chair Jeffrey Fetzer, with Commissioner Luke Holland elected as presiding officer for recusal items. Key decisions included approval of a demolition at 250 East Grayson (8-2), approval of a second-story addition at 301 Barrera (8-1), approval of modifications to the natatorium and sports court at 509 King William (8-1), approval of stone wainscoting at 201 North St. Mary Street (unanimous), and approval of signage replacements at 1103 East Commerce (9-0-1) and 3406 Roosevelt Avenue (unanimous). Consent Calendar - The commission approved 12 consent agenda items (1, 3-7, 10-12) with staff stipulations after pulling items 2, 8, and 9 for discussion. Items approved included addresses at 326, 330, and 350 West Jones, 115 Plaza de Armas, Alamo Plaza phase seven, 415 Wix, 824 West Magnolia, 2051 West Magnolia, 125 West Ashby, 523 East We Satch, and 2321 North Main. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 9 (509 King William): Deborah Walker opposed the proposed pickleball court, stating it would be too close to her living space and requested its removal. She welcomed the new neighbors but emphasized the court's impact. Jill Popovich expressed strong support for the Conway family's plans, noting their consideration of historic character and community. - Item 15 (3406 Roosevelt Avenue): Jane Henry, president of Mission San Jose Neighborhood Association, opposed the proposed internally illuminated sign, citing the need for high-quality materials and authenticity in the historic district. Rosemary Yangiana Zunaga, a descendant of the missions, opposed the applicant's prior permit violations and urged adherence to historic district regulations. Discussion Items - Item 2 – 250 East Grayson (Demolition): The applicant requested demolition of a 25,000 sq ft former garage/warehouse at Pearl to build 85,000 sq ft of retail. The applicant argued the building was not adaptable for pedestrian-friendly retail due to grade issues, narrow sidewalks, and structural constraints, despite attempts at adaptive reuse ($28M and $23M projects proved economically infeasible). They committed to salvaging brick, trusses, windows, and other materials for reuse. Commissioner Garcia opposed, stating demolition set a poor precedent and the new facade's arched windows were inappropriate. Commissioner Velasquez expressed concern about precedent but acknowledged the project's economic importance. The motion to approve with staff stipulations passed 8-2 (Garcia and Velasquez nay). - Item 8 – 301 Barrera (Addition): The applicant proposed a two-story addition to a one-story historic home to add two bedrooms and bathrooms. Discussion focused on breaking up the massing of the second-story horizontal siding. Commissioner Group suggested adding a visual trim band below the clerestory windows to separate the floors, which the applicant accepted. The motion to approve with staff stipulations and an additional stipulation for a trim band passed 8-1 (Garcia nay). - Item 9 – 509 King William (Natatorium & Sports Court): The applicant sought to deconstruct three facade bays of the natatorium to open it to a pool grotto and install a pickleball court. Commissioners who attended the site visit supported the plan, noting the facade is not visible from the street. Commissioner Garcia expressed grief at the loss of historic fabric but acknowledged the design was beautiful. A stipulation required further landscape and lighting plans for the court. The motion to approve with staff stipulations passed 8-1 (Fetzer no). - Item 13 – 201 North St. Mary Street (Stone Wainscoting): The applicant initially proposed cast stone wainscoting but agreed to staff's recommendation for smooth ashlar stone matching the historic finish. Commissioners Velasquez and Galloway suggested pulling the wainscoting further from the corners and aligning with architectural elements (sign, light). The applicant accepted. The motion to approve with stipulations passed unanimously. - Item 14 – 1103 East Commerce (Signage Replacement): The applicant sought to replace existing Aiden Hotel signs with larger St. Paul Hotel signs (127 sq ft south facade, 776 sq ft west facade) and reface two monument signs. Staff recommended scaling down to match existing architectural bands. Commissioners Group and Galloway proposed reductions of approximately 30% and 20% and alignment with brickwork and banding. The applicant agreed to work with staff. Motion to approve with stipulations passed 9-0-1 (Velasquez abstained). - Item 15 – 3406 Roosevelt Avenue (Signage): The applicant proposed a 46 sq ft internally illuminated wall-mounted sign for Joel's Collision. Staff recommended indirect lighting and individually mounted letters (no raceway). The applicant agreed to indirect lighting but requested a raceway to avoid drilling into the new facade. The commission approved the sign with indirect lighting but allowed the raceway as proposed. Motion to approve with stipulations passed unanimously. Key Outcomes - Minutes Approved: Minutes from September 16, 2026, were approved (8-0-1, Davis abstained). - Item 2: Demolition approved (8-2) with staff stipulations, including salvage plan. - Item 8: Second-story addition approved (8-1) with additional stipulation for visual trim band. - Item 9: Natatorium modifications and sports court approved (8-1) with stipulation for landscape/lighting plan. - Item 13: Stone wainscoting approved (unanimous) with stipulations to align with architectural elements. - Item 14: Signage replacement approved (9-0-1) with stipulations to scale down and align with building bands. - Item 15: Wall-mounted signage approved (unanimous) with stipulations for indirect lighting; raceway permitted.

The Historical and Design Review Commission (HDRC) convened on October 7, 2022, to consider a consent calendar, public comments, and several development cases. The meeting was chaired by Interim President Jeffrey Fetzer (who later recused himself for a vote) and then by Commissioner Holland. The commission approved most items with stipulations, after discussions about demolition, facade changes, and signage in historic districts. Consent Calendar - Agenda items not pulled by commissioners were approved unanimously with staff stipulations. These included projects at: 326 West Jones, 330 West Jones, Alamo Plaza, 115 Plaza de Armas, 250 and Grayson, 321 Alamo Plaza, 415 Wix, 824 West Magnolia, 2051 West Magnolia, 125 West Ashby, 523 WizH, and 2321 Normain. Owners of these properties were excused and will receive certificates of appropriateness. Public Comments & Testimony - Deborah Walker (King William resident) spoke in opposition to a proposed pickleball court at 349 King William, citing noise and disruption to the historic residential neighborhood. She requested the court not be installed, stating there are many pickleball courts elsewhere. - Jill Popavich (neighbor) spoke in support of the Conway family’s project, praising the design’s blend of old and new, and expressing that the family has been considerate of the historic character. Discussion Items - Item 2 – 250 East Grayson & 33 Pearl Parkway (Demolition) - The applicant sought a certificate of appropriateness to demolish a former stable building (8,500 sq ft industrial structure) to make way for a new retail development. They argued that preserving the building would cost $28 million (over $9,000 per sq ft) and that adaptive reuse was financially infeasible. A salvage plan was proposed to reuse bricks, windows, and other materials. - Several commissioners expressed regret over the loss. Commissioner García noted it was “unfortunate” and that architects should rise to the challenge; Commissioner Velázquez criticized the complete demolition, calling it a significant precedent. The motion to approve with staff stipulations passed 7–2 (Commissioners García and Velázquez dissenting). - Item 8 – 301 Barrera (Addition to historic house) - The applicant proposed adding a second story to a one-bedroom, one-bath house to include two additional bedrooms and baths. The design raised the facade height along Barrera Street. Commissioner Davis pulled the item to discuss facade proportions. - The architect agreed to add a horizontal feature to break the tall vertical mass, consistent with existing conditions. A motion to approve with that added stipulation passed 7–1 (Commissioner García dissenting). - Item 9 – 349 King William (Pool house and pickleball court) - The applicants (Conway family) proposed to refurbish a historic pool house by replacing the facade with larger openings to connect to a new pool, and adding a private pickleball court. Public testimony included opposition over the court and support for the design. - Commissioners who visited the site noted the deteriorated interior condition. The commission discussed the three-bay facade modification; the applicant explained that the existing central door was a later alteration and that restoring three bays was appropriate. A motion to approve with staff stipulations passed 7–2 (Commissioners García and Fetzer dissenting). - Item 13 – 241 North Street (Stone panel facade) - The applicant requested approval for a stone panel on the north facade, after staff recommended a finish matching the existing terra cotta. The architect agreed to use a material consistent with the east facade. - After discussion about alignment and spacing, a motion to approve with a stipulation to create more space on the right and left sides passed unanimously. - Item 14 – 1103 East Commerce (Saint Paul Hotel signs) - The applicant proposed replacing two existing signs with larger ones: a 127 sq ft sign on the south facade and a 746 sq ft sign on the west facade (highway-facing). Public comment noted the current signs are smaller. Staff recommended approval with consistency to architectural elements. - Commissioners suggested reducing the sign sizes and aligning them within existing brick lines. A motion to approve with direction to work with staff on scaling and alignment (30% reduction on one side, 20% on the other) passed 8–1 (Commissioner Velázquez abstained). - Item 15 – 3406 Roosevelt Avenue (Mural sign for business) - The applicant proposed an internally illuminated 46 sq ft mural sign for a business across from Mission San José. Staff recommended approval with stipulations: indirect lighting, individual letters rather than a channel, and durable materials. - Two public speakers opposed, citing historic district guidelines and previous enforcement. The applicant offered to use indirect lighting. A motion to approve with stipulations 1 and 2 (indirect lighting, durable materials) but without requiring individual letters (instead allowing a minimally visible channel) passed unanimously. Key Outcomes - Consent Calendar – Approved all non-pulled items. - Item 2 (Demolition at Pearl) – Approved 7–2. - Item 8 (301 Barrera addition) – Approved 7–1 with added horizontal design element. - Item 9 (King William pool house) – Approved 7–2. - Item 13 (241 North stone panel) – Approved unanimously with spacing stipulation. - Item 14 (Saint Paul Hotel signs) – Approved 8–1 with direction to rescale and align. - Item 15 (Roosevelt Avenue mural) – Approved unanimously with modified lighting and mount stipulations.

The Audit Committee met to review contract recommendations, accept audit reports, and consider the proposed FY 2027 audit plan. No written agenda or minutes were available, so this summary is based on the raw transcript. The transcript states the meeting began at 10:05 a.m. on October 7, 2022 and ended at 11:35 a.m.; however, the date supplied for this summary is October 7, 2026, and that date is used here. Consent Calendar - The committee approved the previous meeting minutes by voice vote, with no corrections offered. Public Comments & Testimony - Mary Scott, speaking for Act 4 SA, thanked the committee for including a police audit in the FY 2027 plan. She asked the committee to deepen the audit to cover total compensation, management, and contracting, and to make results public and repeat the audit every three years, citing the city budget gap. - Christian Núñez asked the committee to expand the police audit to include total compensation, deferred payments, incentives, and payment amendments. He also requested a recurring police audit every three years, noting that San Antonio faces a significant financial gap and that the police department has not been audited for several years. Discussion Items - Alamodome supplemental custodial services (Item 2): Staff presented an informational RFP for supplemental custodial and event services at the Alamodome. The estimated contract value is $13,250,000 over a three-year base term with two one-year renewal options. Services include event-day and post-event cleaning, restroom maintenance, trash and waste collection, and staff support during event transitions. Evaluation criteria were 30 points for experience and qualifications, 40 points for the proposed plan, 20 points for price, and 10 points for the prime contractor program; the SBE subcontracting requirement is 14%. Committee discussion emphasized cleanliness and restroom responsiveness during events. - Alamodome supplemental security services (Item 3): Staff presented an informational RFP for supplemental security services, including entry guidance, ticket collection, entrance security, and visible security operations. The proposed term is three years with two one-year renewal options. The agenda read stated a total estimated value of $10 million, while the presentation stated $15 million; this discrepancy is noted. Committee members raised concerns about security coverage for merchandise lines, photo booths, and crowd flow, and asked staff to share event reimbursement information with the committee. - HR temporary personnel services contracts (Item 4): Staff recommended proceeding to City Council with three contracts for citywide temporary personnel services, with an estimated total value of $12,500,000 over three years with two one-year renewal options. Staff reported that 156 vendors were notified, 58 attended the pre-bid conference, and 33 did not respond; 27 responses were received. The current contract expires December 21. Discussion addressed department usage, the 6% SBE subcontracting requirement, and certification of small businesses. The committee approved the motion by voice vote. - Fire Station No. 30 construction contract (Item 5): Staff recommended proceeding to City Council with a construction contract for the new Fire Station No. 30 at 2935 Castroville Road, with an estimated value of $10 million. There were 12 bids, 8 qualified, and the top-ranked firm was selected after interviews. The committee discussed the evaluation and scoring process and requested a follow-up memorandum explaining the scoring definitions. The motion passed by voice vote. - Public Works right-of-way permit audit (Item 6): The committee accepted the city auditor’s report on Public Works right-of-way permits. Auditors found effective controls for processing permit requests and denials, but identified improvement areas in payment processes, right-of-way fee accuracy, and account management. The department reported $5.4 million in permit-related revenue. Staff discussed 254 pending accounts and noted that some money may not be recoverable; a collection schedule and recoverability assessment were requested. The motion passed by voice vote. - Municipal on-site solar energy audit (Item 7): The committee accepted audit report AU25-035 on the municipal on-site solar energy program. The program, delivered with contractor Big Sun Solar, aimed to install 13.06 megawatts of solar capacity; by February 2026, 22 sites were completed and $12.3 million had been paid for solar installations and third-party inspection. The audit found that controls and procedures were insufficient or nonexistent in areas including contractor monitoring, inspection documentation, energy savings calculations, and system access. The department agreed with the recommendations and expects completion by August. The motion passed by voice vote. - Ready to Work audit (Item 8): The committee accepted audit report AU 25-10800 on the WDO Ready to Work program. Auditors found effective controls overall, but recommended verifying that on-the-job training employees are full-time; 13 of 103 sampled employees could not be verified as full-time. They also recommended monitoring one of eight agency performance measures, specifically one-year job retention, and deactivating inactive SINC platform user accounts; 3 of 30 non-City users were inactive for 60 days but not deactivated. Staff said procedures were updated and documentation was later obtained. The motion passed by voice vote. - Proposed FY 2027 audit plan (Item 9): City Auditor Body Vargas presented the proposed FY 2027 audit plan, which includes 30 audits, 3 consulting projects, and 1,000 hours reserved for special projects. He recommended cancelling one planned audit based on current audit observations and collection opportunities. Priorities include revenue recognition, operational savings, grant compliance, and the requested police audit. Committee discussion addressed IT audit coverage and long intervals since some audit topics had been covered. The committee approved the plan by voice vote. Key Outcomes - Approved the previous meeting minutes by voice vote. - Received informational updates on Alamodome custodial and security service RFPs; no votes were taken on those items. - Authorized staff to proceed to City Council with the HR temporary personnel services contract recommendation. - Authorized staff to proceed to City Council with the Fire Station No. 30 construction contract recommendation. - Accepted audit reports for Public Works right-of-way permits, municipal solar projects, and the Ready to Work program. - Approved the proposed FY 2027 audit plan. - Directed staff follow-up on: department-level use of temporary personnel services; Fire Station No. 30 scoring definitions; Alamodome event reimbursements; and Public Works collection schedules and recoverability. - All votes were voice votes; no roll-call tallies were recorded in the transcript.

The San Antonio City Council held a B session on October 7, 2026, to receive a briefing from the Government Affairs department on the proposed state legislative program for the 90th Texas legislative session (beginning January 2027) and a preview of the federal initiatives timeline. Sally Basur, Director of Government Affairs, presented the program, which outlines the city's policy and funding priorities for advocacy in Austin. Councilmembers provided feedback and highlighted district-specific concerns. Discussion Items Presentation on Legislative Landscape and Priorities Sally Basur reviewed the upcoming legislative session, noting significant turnover in both chambers, including at least 24 new House members and five new senators. She emphasized that the city's top priorities include protecting municipal authority, opposing unfunded mandates, preserving the municipally owned model for CPS Energy and SAWS, supporting the downtown sports and entertainment district, advancing flood resilience projects, and advocating for increased education funding. New items added for the 90th session include support for local parks and opposition to negative community impacts from data center development. Basur also outlined key legislative dates and the city's process for bill tracking through the Texas Municipal League. Councilmember Comments and Positions - Councilmember Via Gran urged proactive engagement with state and federal initiatives, emphasized flexibility, and stressed the importance of working with school districts through the Bexar County Education Coalition. He supported local control and strategic selection of battles in Austin. - Councilmember Galvan expressed full support for the proposed plan and highlighted the need to preserve local authority over data center regulation, address child care gaps, and resolve cluster mailbox theft issues related to state code conflicts. - Councilmember White requested transparency for taxpayers via a public dashboard tracking supported and opposed bills. He raised concerns about fiscal impact bills that might provide tax relief but reduce city revenue, and asked staff to bring such bills to council for direction. He also asked about potential legislation to restrict vape shops near schools. - Councilmember Mesa Gonzalez emphasized the importance of municipal authority, especially protecting CPS Energy and the military overlay district. She requested consideration of expanding the definition of "schools" to include daycare centers for alcohol sales distance regulations, and monitoring short-term rental issues. She advocated for state funding for the Camp Bullis Bridge project. - Councilmember McKee Rodriguez (IGR Committee Chair) noted the robust agenda and alignment among council. He stressed the need to protect local governance and oppose legislation targeting marginalized groups. He announced plans to schedule meetings with the San Antonio delegation and smaller meetings for councilmembers to build relationships. He emphasized telling San Antonio's story and being flexible. - Councilmember Castillo fully supported the agenda and underscored maintaining local control, protecting CPS Energy, and addressing metal recycler regulations and fence-line air monitoring. She highlighted support for the Center for Healthcare Services, public education, re-entry programs, flood control, and crypto fraud prevention. - Councilmember Corr highlighted infrastructure funding gaps for Vision Zero and climate resilience. She stressed protecting municipally owned utilities, supporting the diversion center and mental health facilities, and tracking housing and transit-oriented development bills. She urged supporting partner priorities as city priorities. - Councilmember Mungia emphasized the South Texas Parkway, public education, CPS Energy's affordability and transmission work, and the need for state funding for flood infrastructure beyond bond capacity. - Mayor Jones requested citywide talking points (e.g., 14 flood projects totaling $411 million) to amplify impact. He emphasized protecting CPS Energy, highlighting its transmission contributions and the value of Port San Antonio and Texas Cyber Command. He requested attention to consumer protection regarding AI, housing for special populations, and ensuring state systems work correctly (maternal mortality reports, Medicaid backlog, voter registration backlog). He specifically asked for support to pursue federal dollars for the summer lunch program and advocate for special education funding. Key Outcomes - The council provided direction and feedback on the proposed legislative program. - The legislative program will be presented for formal approval at the October 29th City Council session. - The Government Affairs team will continue to update the IGR committee and full council on legislative developments, with increased frequency as the session progresses. - A public dashboard tracking the city's support and opposition to bills will be maintained. - The federal legislative program briefings will begin in November 2026, with council approval anticipated in January 2027. - Councilmembers will engage with state delegation members through scheduled meetings and trips to Austin to advocate for the city's priorities.

The San Antonio Audit Committee met on October 7, 2026, from 10:05 a.m. to 11:35 a.m. Chair Villagran presided; Councilmembers Mesa Gonzalez and White, Citizen Members Tinal and Pacheco, and Chair Villagran were present, establishing a quorum. The committee took up procurement briefings, contract awards, three final audit reports, and the proposed FY2027 annual audit plan. Public Comments & Testimony - Mary Scott (Katie), with Act for SA, thanked the committee for adding a police overtime audit to the FY2027 plan and asked the auditor to expand it to total compensation, grant management, and contracts; to make findings public; and to repeat the audit every three years, citing the city budget gap. - Christian Nunez, director of organizing at Akron SA, supported the proposed 1,000-hour SAPD overtime audit, noting overtime had not been audited since 2020 and that SAPD spent more than $34 million against a $17.7 million overtime budget in 2024 within a $631 million department. He asked for the audit to cover total compensation, benefit/leave/incentive pay, a SAPD grant management audit, a SAPD contract review, public progress reports, and a recurring audit every three years. Pre-Solicitation Briefings - (Item 2) Custodial and supplemental conversion services for the Alamodome. Staff proposed an annual contract for cleaning, restroom maintenance, trash/recycling disposal, and supplemental labor during event transitions, with an estimated total value of $13.25 million, initial 3-year term and two 1-year renewals, funded by the Alamodome Fund. The current contract expires May 31. Solicitation planned for release Oct. 12, proposals due Nov. 30, and contract start June 1. Outreach included 295 vendors notified and 4 targeted. Evaluation: 30 points experience/qualifications, 40 proposed plan, 20 price, 10 SBE prime; 14% subcontracting requirement. Chair Villagran stressed expectations for in-event cleaners training and customer interaction; staff described real-time issue escalation. This item was briefing only. - (Item 3) Event attendant and supplemental event security services for the Alamodome. Staff proposed a contract for guest guidance, ticket collection/verification, entry screening, restricted-area security, crowd control, and visible security presence. Estimated total value $15 million, initial 3-year term and two 1-year renewals, funded by the Alamodome Fund; current contract expires Sept. 30. Solicitation release planned Oct. 22, proposals due Dec. 8, contract start Oct. 1. Outreach included 362 vendors notified and 3 targeted. Evaluation criteria were the same as item 2, with an 11% subcontracting requirement. Chair Villagran said security must prepare for changing crowds, merchandise lines, photo ops, and family events. A councilmember asked about supplemental event terminology and school district security cost reimbursements; staff said renters/partners reimburse event-related expenses such as security for graduations and UTSA football, and the councilmember asked to see reimbursement data. This item was briefing only. Post-Solicitation Procurement Approvals - (Item 4) Temporary staffing services. Human Resources presented an RFP for citywide temporary staffing, estimated total value $12.5 million, 3 years with two 1-year renewals; current contract expires Dec. 21. Of 156 notified vendors, 58 attended the pre-submittal conference; 60 responded; 33 were deemed non-responsive for failing to meet the 6% subcontracting requirement, and one additional respondent was deemed non-responsive for failing to provide all required documentation, leaving 26 responsive proposals. Staff recommended awarding to the three highest-scoring responsive vendors. Discussion noted current usage of 90 temps citywide (39 DHS, 15 animal care, 6 finance), and a committee member asked for a department/function breakdown and why one vendor lacked SBE prime points. Motion approved. - (Item 5) Fire Station No. 33 construction. Capital Delivery recommended awarding the 2022 bond project at 2935 Castroville Road, District 5, to the top-ranked proposer, with an estimated $10 million contract and roughly 400-day construction period. Twelve bids were received; four were non-responsive, leaving eight scored. The committee discussed the scoring rubric; staff said the evaluation guide defines excellent/good ranges and agreed to provide a follow-up memo explaining the scoring legend. Motion approved to move the contract to City Council. Audit Report: PWD Right-of-Way Permits (Item 6) - The audit (AU 25-033) found effective controls for 311 service requests and documenting denied permits, but identified weaknesses in policies/procedures, permit phase accuracy, fee accuracy, and accounts receivable management. In FY2025, about 19,000 permit applications were submitted and $5.4 million revenue generated. The audit recommended clearer written procedures, monitoring of permit phases, accurate invoicing of emergency excavation fees, parking restrictions, and violations, and adherence to Administrative Directive AD 8.4 for past-due accounts. - Public Works staff accepted the findings, noted staff training and new procedures, and said permits will not be issued to applicants with balances past due 90 days. A committee member asked about the $954,000 outstanding balance; staff said $142,000 had been collected and the rest was being processed for write-off, with some old debts not recoverable. Staff agreed to provide a written collection update at the halfway point. Motion to accept the audit carried. Audit Report: Municipal On-Site Solar Project (Item 7) - The audit (AU 25-035) concluded the department did not have adequate controls to monitor the municipal on-site solar program. A master services agreement with Big Sun was executed in Nov. 2023; the goal is about 13 MW and $1.8 million annual utility savings; as of Feb. 2026, 22 sites were completed and $12 million had been paid. Findings included gaps in contract monitoring of Big Sun and third-party inspector West East, missing documentation for replacement sites and inspection letters, payments made before inspection documentation was received or not approved by fiscal staff, issues with energy savings calculations, and inappropriate user access to PrimeLink. The department agreed and set completion date Aug. 2026. - Chair Villagran thanked the audit team for early review and said solar investment was an important story. A committee member raised concerns about how the city can independently confirm work was complete and suggested pre-implementation audits/cost analysis. Motion to accept the audit carried. Audit Report: Ready to Work Program (Item 8) - The audit (AU 25-036) of the Workforce Development Office Ready to Work program found effective controls overall. Positive results included participant eligibility, prime agency reporting, SBE goals on track, authorized employers, appropriate services, invoicing reviews, insurance monitoring, and advisory board collaboration. Recommendations addressed verifying full-time W-2 status for OJT/IWT participants (13 of 103 trainees not initially verified), monitoring all eight performance measures including one-year retention, and improving user access controls to the Sync platform (3 of 30 non-COSA users had inappropriate access). - Workforce staff said the programs now measure retention internally at 85% against an 80% goal; 63% of participants are placed within six months and 73% within 12 months; all missing documentation was later obtained and an SOP now requires verification before future reimbursement. Motion to accept the audit carried. FY2027 Annual Audit Plan (Item 9) - City Auditor Buddy Vargas presented the proposed FY2027 plan, required by ordinance, with 30 audits, 3 consulting projects, and 1,000 reserved hours for special project requests. He recommended cancelling the standalone accounts receivable audit from the FY2026 plan because current audits already identify AR trends. Priorities include revenue recognition, operations, cost savings, grants compliance, and the requested SAPD overtime audit. The plan is targeted for City Council consideration Oct. 29 and can be modified only with audit committee approval. - Discussion included why some areas had no audit in seven years; staff explained resource allocation and FY2026 carryover IT audits. A committee member asked about the vehicle replacement/renewal fund; staff agreed to consider including it in the fleet operational audit if applicable. Public comments earlier asked for the SAPD audit scope and public reporting. Motion to approve the FY2027 audit plan carried. Key Outcomes - Approved meeting minutes. - Approved HR temporary staffing contracts to proceed to City Council. - Approved Fire Station 33 construction contract to proceed to City Council. - Accepted the three audit reports (Items 6, 7, and 8). - Approved the FY2027 annual audit plan, including cancellation of the standalone accounts receivable audit. - Staff will provide follow-up items: scoring rubric memo; temp staffing departmental usage breakdown; PWD right-of-way collection update; confirmation on vehicle replacement fund in fleet audit scope; and Alamodome security reimbursement data.