Public Meetings - San Antonio, Texas

The San Antonio Planning Commission met on July 9, 2025, at 2:00 PM. The meeting included a consent agenda for routine approvals and an individual hearing on a requested plan amendment for a funeral home at 13900 Jones Maltzberger Road. The meeting adjourned at 2:27 PM. Consent Calendar - The consent agenda, comprising all items except number 11, was approved by a unanimous roll call vote (7-0). Commissioner Lopez recused himself from item 8 (a voicemail regarding a warehouse at 12415 Autumn Vista Street was played but no discussion was held). Public Comments & Testimony - Item 11 – Plan Amendment at 13900 Jones Maltzberger Road: A voicemail from a resident (210-878-8374) raised 11 questions about a proposed warehouse on item 8 (not this item). For item 11, a voicemail from the president of the Gardens of Ocalo HOA (1811 Shoal Run Street) expressed opposition to changing the land use from Parks Open Space to Community Commercial, citing late notice, negative impact on property values, and concerns about a funeral home/crematorium across the street. - Alan Casier (12515 Enfield Park) spoke in opposition, noting the property is in a Special Flood Hazard Area (FEMA flood zone), with a creek (Lawrence Creek) and a bridge where flooding has occurred. He described an SUV swept into a tree during a past flood. - Kim Pettett (2034 Oak Mist), president of the North Central Thousand Oaks Neighborhood Association (NIKTONA), opposed the rezoning, stating it does not fit the residential character of the area (2,500 homes), would complicate traffic at the intersection of Oakline and Jones Maltzberger, and requested more details on whether the facility includes a crematory. - Tambra Rick Halde (owner of the adjacent 8 acres at 13900 Jones Maltzberger) was not opposed but requested that an easement or access be included, as her property is currently landlocked. Discussion Items - Item 11 – Plan Amendment from Parks Open Space to Community Commercial: Staff planner Alexa Ratano presented the request to rezone the property to C-2 CD (Commercial District with Conditional Use for a funeral home/undertaking parlor). Staff noted 23 notices mailed, 0 in favor, 2 opposed within 200 feet, and 2 opposed outside 200 feet. The property abuts existing commercial to the west, fronts a secondary arterial, and is buffered by a 100-year floodplain. Staff recommended approval. - Applicant Jeremy Burnell (19141 Milan Street) stated he owns three funeral homes in San Antonio and has owned the property for 15 years, previously a gentlemen's club. He plans to remodel the existing building (no demolition), add minimal parking, and beautify the site. He disputed flood concerns, stating flooding has never reached the building. He noted the neighboring Tommy John's tailgate restaurant uses his parking lot. He emphasized the C-2D zoning would prevent large corporate development. - Commissioner Questions: Commissioners asked about the current use (vacant), flood zone limitations (only remodeling allowed), and parking changes (adding a few spaces). Staff confirmed that during platting, flood, wastewater, and traffic impacts will be reviewed. The access issue for the adjacent landowner was noted as a civil matter. Key Outcomes - Motion to Approve Item 11: Approved by a unanimous roll call vote (7-0). Commissioner Lopez had returned after recusing from item 8. The plan amendment from Parks Open Space to Community Commercial was approved, allowing the conditional use for a funeral home. - Consent Agenda: Approved unanimously (7-0). - Meeting Adjourned: 2:27 PM.

The San Antonio Zoning Board of Appeals (BOA) met on July 7, 2025, starting at 1:07 PM and adjourning at 5:34 PM. The board, with 11 members present, heard 11 agenda items including variances, special exceptions, and appeals related to zoning, setbacks, fencing, and short-term rentals. Significant discussion centered on a proposed mobile food court on Culebra Road, a 12-unit short-term rental on Mason Street, and several property owners seeking relief from code requirements. Consent Calendar - Agenda Item 4 (1120 Buena Vista): An oral motion to postpone to July 21, 2025, passed without opposition. - Agenda Item 9 (Appeal of Joel Ferdin): Postponed to August 4, 2025, due to the attorney's unavailability. - Minutes: Unanimously approved. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 9 (Roosevelt Avenue): James Henry, president of the Mission San José Neighborhood Association, and Brian Alexander spoke in opposition to a repair shop and paint booth at 3406 Roosevelt, citing non-conforming use, lack of permits, and visual blight near the historic mission. James Henry provided photographs showing emissions from the site during a parade. Brian Alexander requested proactive enforcement of rules for businesses in historic districts. - Item 5 (Ceniza Drive Carport): Three voicemails and Paris Reynolds, a resident of 342 Ceniza Drive, spoke in opposition to the requested variance for a carport at 334 Ceniza Drive. Paris Reynolds stated the owner built without a permit and ignored neighborhood preservation standards. Ted Guerra, president of the Jefferson Neighborhood Association, and Bianca Maldonado, of the Monticello Neighborhood Association, also opposed the variance, citing non-compliance with NCD standards and the owner's failure to complete the permit process. - Item 3 (Mason Street STR): Two voicemails: one from Marlene Hawkins (210-325-7297) and one from Nancy Money (618 Mason Street) supporting the short-term rental (STR) application. John (property manager at 608 Mason Street) spoke against a second type-2 STR on the block, citing parking, noise, and trash issues. No other public comments were received for items 1, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, or 13. Discussion Items - Item 1 (414 Regina Street – Carport & Alley Access): Staff recommended approval for two variances to allow alley access and two driveway cuts for a multifamily property at 414 Regina Street. The owner is rehabilitating the house through a city program. No opposition was noted. The board approved the request unanimously. - Item 3 (607 Mason Street – Short-Term Rental): Applicant Lisa Hendrickson requested a special exception for a Type-2 STR at 607 Mason Street. Staff recommended denial because adding this unit would exceed the 12.5% cap on the block (currently one STR exists at 611 Mason). The applicant argued they hired a professional management company (Avelera) and were unaware of permitting requirements until after investing approximately $5,000 in concrete work. The board held extensive discussion; the motion to approve failed 6-5, so the request was denied. - Item 5 (334 Ceniza Drive – Carport Variance): Staff recommended denial for a variance to reduce the front setback from 20 ft to 11 ft 6 in and to allow metal roofing for a front-yard carport. The owner, Edgar Manrique, had built without a permit. The motion to approve failed initially 7-4. The board later reopened the case, and a new motion to approve the variance without the material exemption passed 9-2. - Item 6 (6238 Randolph Boulevard – Fence Variance): Staff recommended denial for a corrugated metal fence at a commercial lot (San Antonio Dodge) used for vehicle storage. The owner cited theft and safety concerns. The board approved the variance, with an amendment to add a top cap to the fence, by a unanimous vote. - Item 7 (26 Sims Avenue – Multiple Variances): The owner, Maria Castanon, requested multiple variances for a carport, fence, and clear vision areas. She explained she built without permits due to lack of knowledge. After extensive discussion, the board approved the requests in two separate motions, both unanimously, with conditions for the fence to be predominantly open in the clear vision areas. - Item 8 (1310 Watching Lane – Mobile Food Court): Applicant Jennifer Austin requested variances for a mobile food court (up to 10 food trucks) at the corner of Culebra Road. Staff recommended denial for three variances: 200-ft separation from residential uses, a 10-ft landscape buffer, and a 6-ft front fence height. The board approved all three after amending the buffer variance from 10 to 5 ft, citing community support and the commercial character of the area. - Item 10 (3909 Tupelo Lane – Privacy Fence): Applicant Kevin Fitzgerald requested a special exception for a 6-ft-high privacy fence in the front yard. Staff recommended denial, but the board approved the request by a unanimous vote, noting the large lot size and security concerns in the area. - Item 12 (442 Keyton Avenue – Carport Variance): The owner, Maria Rodriguez, requested variances for a front and side setback to replace an existing 20-year-old carport. Staff recommended approval after the applicant amended the request to include gutters on the east side. The board approved unanimously. - Item 13 (523 Eleanor Avenue – Roof Pitch Variance): Applicant Ben Wild, an architect, requested a variance from NCD standards to allow a flat roof on a rear addition to a historic home. Staff recommended denial, but the board approved the request unanimously, finding the addition would be compatible and not visible from the street. Key Outcomes - Item 1 (414 Regina Street): Motion to grant variances (alley access and two driveway cuts) passed 11-0. - Item 3 (607 Mason Street): Motion to grant special exception for Type-2 STR failed 6-5 (6 opposed: Benavides, Stevens, Dean, Cruz, Mena, Brown; 5 approved: Barrington, Ibáñez, Bregman, Vázquez, Oren). The request was denied. - Item 5 (334 Ceniza Drive): Initial motion to grant variance failed 7-4. Upon reconsideration, motion to grant variance (excluding material) passed 9-2. The owner must comply with remaining NCD material standards. - Item 6 (6238 Randolph Boulevard): Motion to grant fence variance with top cap passed 11-0. - Item 7 (26 Sims Avenue): Motion to grant multiple variances (setbacks, clear vision, fence material, privacy fence) passed 11-0 for the first group, and the second motion (special exception for fence height) also passed 11-0. - Item 8 (1310 Watching Lane): Motion to grant variances for separation (from 200 ft to 0 ft), buffer (from 10 ft to 5 ft), and fence height (from 5 ft to 6 ft) passed 11-0. - Item 10 (3909 Tupelo Lane): Motion to grant special exception for privacy fence (6 ft vs. max 3 ft) passed 11-0. - Item 12 (442 Keyton Avenue): Motion to grant variances (front and side setbacks) passed 10-0. - Item 13 (523 Eleanor Avenue): Motion to grant variance from NCD roof pitch standards passed 11-0.

The Board of Adjustments met on Monday, July 7, 2025, from 1:07 p.m. to 5:34 p.m. to hear ten agenda items including variances, special exceptions, and appeals. The board granted most requests, denied one, and continued two cases. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 9 (continued): Two voicemails and two speakers opposed a nonconforming use appeal at 3406 Roosevelt. Jane Henry (President, Mission San Jose Neighborhood Association) vigorously opposed the unpermitted additions (smokestacks) near Mission San Jose, citing visual impact. Brady Alexander (Hot Wells Mission Reach Neighborhood Association) supported requiring compliance with historic overlay rules. - Item 3 (607 Mason Street STR): Four voicemails and one speaker: Marlene Hawkins (Government Hill Community Association) asked to deny the second type 2 STR. Nancy Mawney (neighbor) supported the applicants, calling them an asset to the block. John (neighbor) opposed more STRs due to parking, noise, and trash. - Item 5 (334 Senisa Drive carport): Three voicemails supported the carport; Ted Guerra (Jefferson Neighborhood Association president) opposed, citing violations and noncompliance with NCD standards. Bianca Maldonado (Monticello Park Neighborhood Association) also opposed. Patty Zions (neighbor, board member of JNA) spoke in opposition, noting the applicant proceeded without a permit despite prior notice. - Item 10 (3909 Tupelo Lane fence): Two speakers – the applicant’s representative and homeowner Patricia Perron – argued for a 6’3” privacy fence to enhance safety and match the neighborhood character. - Item 12 (442 Caton Ave carport): Two voicemails supported the reconstruction. The applicant, Maria Rodriguez, noted verbal approval from adjacent neighbors. Discussion Items - Continuances (Items 4 & 9): Item 4 (1120 Buena Vista, parking variances) continued to July 21, 2025. Item 9 (3406 Roosevelt, nonconforming use appeal) continued to August 5, 2025, due to applicant’s attorney unavailability. - Item 11 (414 Regina Street): Request for alley access and two driveways on a 50-foot lot. Staff recommended approval. Applicant Erica Ragsdale (City NHS) described rehab. Commissioners noted the alley is paved and adequate. Approved unanimously. - Item 3 (607 Mason Street): Special exception for an additional type 2 short-term rental (STR) on the block face. Staff recommended denial due to density exceeding 12.5%. Applicant Lisa Hendrickson presented evidence of inadvertent operation without a permit, citing a third-party error. Commissioners debated fairness and neighborhood opposition. Motion to grant failed 6-5 (nine votes required). - Item 5 (334 Senisa Drive): Two variances: 8’6” front setback reduction and elimination of screening requirement for a carport. Staff recommended denial. Applicant Edgar Manrique argued his carport is smaller than others. After initial motion denial (7-4?), the board reopened and granted only the setback variance (9-2), leaving screening to be addressed. - Item 6 (6238 Randolph Boulevard): Fence material variance to allow corrugated metal for security. Staff recommended denial. Applicant Ronnie Capatillo (San Antonio Dodge) reported reduced theft after installation. Staff noted neighbor support. Motion to grant passed unanimously after amendment to add caps on edges. - Item 7 (802 Sims Avenue): Six variances for carport setbacks, fence height, clear vision areas, and fence material. Staff recommended denial on most. Applicant Maria Castanon explained she followed a contractor’s advice without permits. Commissioners worked with applicant to amend: reduced clear vision area, fence material limited to rear, and privacy fence limited to 30’6” with first 15’ predominantly open. Both motions (variances and fence height special exception) passed unanimously. - Item 8 (1310 Watkins Late Lane): Mobile food court variances: elimination of 200-ft separation from residences, 10-ft buffer reduction to 5 ft, and fence height special exception. Staff recommended denial. Applicant’s representative argued the project benefits the community and 20 neighbors signed in support. Council district staff indicated no rezoning conflict. Both motions passed unanimously. - Item 10 (3909 Tupelo Lane): Special exception for a 6’3” privacy fence (3’3” above limit). Staff recommended denial. Applicant Kevin Fitzgerald presented that the fence would be anodized aluminum, matching neighboring lots. Neighbor support and prior similar variance granted. Passed unanimously. - Item 12 (442 Caton Avenue): Two variances for carport setbacks (front 9’11”, side 4’11”). Staff recommended denial. Applicant Maria Rodriguez proposed rebuilding the dilapidated carport within existing footprint with gutters on east side. Approved unanimously. - Item 13 (523 Eleanor Avenue): NCD variance for flat roof on rear addition instead of matching pitch. Staff recommended denial. Applicant Ben Wilde (architect) argued a pitched roof would destroy historic fabric; the flat roof tucks under existing roofline and is not visible from street. Neighbors support. Passed unanimously. Key Outcomes - Item 4: Continued to July 21, 2025. - Item 9: Continued to August 5, 2025. - Item 11: Variances granted (unanimous). - Item 3: Special exception denied (6-5). - Item 5: Setback variance granted (9-2); screening requirement remains. - Item 6: Fence material variance granted (unanimous) with cap amendment. - Item 7: All variances and special exception granted (unanimous). - Item 8: Both variances and special exception granted (unanimous). - Item 10: Special exception granted (unanimous). - Item 12: Variances granted (unanimous) with gutter condition. - Item 13: NCD variance granted (unanimous). - Minutes: Approved.

The Building Standards Board of San Antonio, Texas, met on July 3, 2025, at 10:30 AM (with a technical break) to consider six properties for demolition or repair. The board voted unanimously (5-0) on all actions: ordering demolition for four properties and repair for one property, with one property already addressed via emergency demolition. The meeting included staff reports, police testimony, and owner/representative statements. Consent Calendar - Approval of minutes from the previous meeting: Moved by Anne Wyner, seconded, passed 5-0. - Staff report (Jenny Ramírez): - Liability waiver agreement at 1025 Essex Street (signed June 18, 2025) – no board action needed. - Emergency demolition at 4871 Castle Rose (fire May 28, demolished June 6, 2025) – no board action needed. - Emergency demolition at 711 West Gerald Avenue (fire June 10, demolished June 16, 2025) – no board action needed. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were made during the meeting for any agenda item. Discussion Items 1. 306 Chipinque (District 5) – Demolition - Staff (Crystal Town) presented photos showing severe deterioration, lack of utilities (water inactive since May 2022), squatters, and health hazards (feces, urine, garbage). The structure was deemed dangerous and uninhabitable. - Police officer Patiño testified about drug activity, a firearm found on an arrested individual, and a shooting the night before the inspection. The property is near a school and church. - The owner was not present. The board moved to declare the property a public nuisance and order demolition within 30 days, including eviction of occupants. Motion passed 5-0. 2. 4147 Sunrise Creek Drive (District 2) – Demolition - Staff (Cintia Santana) documented extensive roof holes, water damage, rotting wood, mold, and collapsed insulation. No utilities since 2019. The accessory structure was also dilapidated. - Claudine Espinosa, attorney for the bank (Midfirst/Shore Hopkins), requested more time, stating they were receiving repair quotes. The bank had a mortgage interest but no foreclosure. The board determined insufficient progress and ordered demolition. - Motion passed 5-0 for demolition within 30 days, including clearing debris. 3. 218 West Jackson Avenue (District 3) – Demolition - Staff (Sergio Quintanilla) showed damage from fire and years of neglect, with interior exposed to elements, trash, and evidence of squatters. - Police officer testified about trespassers, illegal activity, and proximity to a high school and elementary school. The owner (Aston James T.S. Off) not present. - Motion to declare public nuisance and demolish within 30 days passed 5-0. 4. 262 Wingate Avenue (District 5) – Repair - Staff (Birgan Bledsoe) presented a dilapidated single-story home with graffiti, missing siding, roof damage, and interior hazards. The property had a history of squatters and a fire in the accessory structure. - Owner Sharon Peters (Sharon Peters Real Estate Inc.) and contractor Mónica Leos attended. Peters explained she bought the property in July 2023, had personal hardships (cancer, family deaths), and had taken steps to secure and clean the property. She presented a work scope and financial ability, estimating repairs in 6 months. Contractor Leos stated repairs could be completed in 90 days. - The board moved to require repair within 90 days, with progress reports every 30 days to the code compliance officer. Motion passed 5-0. 5. 244 Darthurst Drive – Demolition - Staff (Officer Osana) showed fire-damaged structure with burned roof, missing siding, and extensive charring. Owner John Douglas Ward was deceased, and no contact could be made. - Motion to declare public nuisance and demolish within 30 days passed 5-0. 6. 2535 Schley Avenue – Demolition - Supervisor Elisa Valdez presented for absent officer Ryan Garza. The main structure was previously demolished after a fire; only an accessory shed remained, which was severely rotted, with debris, squatter evidence, and missing walls. - Owner not present. Motion to demolish within 30 days passed 5-0. Key Outcomes - Demolition Orders (30 days): 306 Chipinque, 4147 Sunrise Creek Drive, 218 West Jackson Avenue, 244 Darthurst Drive, 2535 Schley Avenue. All passed 5-0. - Repair Order (90 days): 262 Wingate Avenue, with 30-day progress reports to staff. Passed 5-0. - Administrative: Three memorandums for City Council approval on August 7, 2025, and assignment of Paul Hernández to a committee (approved June 12). - Board Request: The board asked staff to clarify when case officers change, to note the point of transfer in records to avoid confusion about prior contacts.

The San Antonio Building Standards Board (BSB) held a public hearing on July 3, 2025, to consider six dilapidated and dangerous properties. The board voted unanimously on all cases, ordering demolition for five properties and repair for one. The meeting included staff reports, police testimony, and appearances by property owners and representatives. Consent Calendar - Minutes Approval: The board approved the minutes of the previous meeting by a vote of 5-0. - Hold Harmless Agreement: The owner of 1025 Essex (Council District 2) voluntarily agreed to allow city demolition. Signed June 18, 2025. No board action required. - Emergency Demolitions: - 4871 Castle Rose (District 2) – demolished June 6, 2025, after a fire on May 28, 2025. - 711 West Gerald (District 3) – demolished June 16, 2025. Both pursuant to Chapter 6-175; no further board action needed. Public Comments & Testimony No public comments were submitted for any agenda item. Discussion Items 1. 306 Chapinke Drive (District 3) – First hearing. Staff presented photos of severe dilapidation: rotted porch, human feces containers, no water/electricity, and active squatting. SAPD Officer Pena testified about drug activity, weapons, and gunfire complaints. The board found the property a public nuisance under City Code Section 6-156 (subsections 1,2,8,11,12,15,17,18) and not feasible to repair. Motion passed 5-0 to demolish within 30 days and vacate the property. 2. 4147 Sunrise Creek Drive (District 1? Not specified) – First hearing. Staff documented collapsed roof, water damage, and rapid deterioration. A lienholder, Mid First Bank (represented by attorney Claudine Espinosa), requested time to obtain repair bids. The board found the property a public nuisance under Section 6-156 (main structure subsections 1,2,5,7,8,11,12,15,17,18; accessory structures separately cited). Motion passed 5-0 to demolish within 30 days, cut all utilities, and secure the property. 3. 218 West Dixon Avenue (District 3) – First hearing. Staff reported fire damage, trash, and vagrant activity. SAPD Officer testified about ongoing squatting and drug calls, noting proximity to schools. The board found the main and accessory structures a public nuisance under Section 6-156. Motion passed 5-0 to demolish within 30 days and vacate the property. 4. 262 Wingate Avenue (District 5) – First hearing. Staff recommended repair. The owner, Sharon Peters (Sharon Peters Real Estate Inc.), testified about personal hardships (father’s death, mother’s illness) and steps taken: securing the property, pulling re-roof and repair permits, hiring contractor Monica Leos. The board noted that the property had been under a stop-work order but permits were inadvertently issued due to a system glitch. The owner provided a scope of work and proof of funds. Motion passed 5-0 to require repair within 90 days, with staff status reports every 30 days. All permits must be obtained before work begins. 5. 244 Dalehurst Drive (District 1? Not specified) – First hearing. Staff documented fire damage, holes in roof, and significant charring. The owner, John Douglas Ward, is deceased; no contact with estate. The board found the main and accessory structures not feasible to repair under Section 6-156 (subsections 1,2,4,5,7,8,11,12,15,17,18). Motion passed 5-0 to demolish within 30 days, vacate, and secure the property. 6. 2535 Schlei Avenue (District 2? Not specified) – First hearing. Staff presented an accessory shed in deteriorated condition; the main structure had already been demolished after a fire in June 2024. The shed had broken windows, rotten wood, and vagrant activity. The board found it a public nuisance under Section 6-156. Motion passed 5-0 to demolish within 30 days. Key Outcomes - Demolition orders for 306 Chapinke, 4147 Sunrise Creek, 218 West Dixon, 244 Dalehurst, and 2535 Schlei – all within 30 days, with vacate/secure requirements where applicable. - Repair order for 262 Wingate – 90 days with 30-day progress reports to staff. - All votes were 5-0. - Administrative note: The board requested that code enforcement officers clearly indicate when they have taken over a case from a predecessor to avoid confusion. Staff acknowledged and will work to improve clarity. - Reappointments: Three board members (Joel Solis, Dr. Linda Lopez Rodriguez, Kayla Miranda) are scheduled for city council approval on August 7, 2025. Paul Hernandez was reappointed on June 12, 2025.

The Historical and Design Review Commission met on Wednesday, July 2, 2025, to consider five agenda items. The meeting was called to order with a quorum present. The commission approved the consent calendar, heard public comment, and deliberated on two contested cases involving modifications to properties in local historic districts. Consent Calendar - Approved the minutes from the June 18, 2025 meeting. - Approved three items on consent, including a matter concerning 1900 Airport Boulevard (details not individually discussed). Public comment was received from the San Antonio Conservation Society urging preservation and compliance with Section 106 review for the airport project. Public Comments & Testimony - San Antonio Conservation Society (via letter read aloud): Urged the city to maintain the historic structure at 1900 Airport Boulevard, incorporate it into the new terminal design, and ensure Section 106 review minimizes impact to historic properties. - Barbara Woodhall (Magnolia Avenue District representative): Submitted a letter supporting staff recommendations for 838 Magnolia Avenue, commending staff for protecting historic district integrity. Discussion Items Item 4 – 838 Magnolia Avenue (Case 2025-158) Applicant Michael Salazar and his representative requested approval to add a rear room, replace wood windows with double-pane aluminum windows, alter the front door configuration, and remove a secondary door. Staff recommended approval with stipulations: - Allow the addition up to 250 square feet, with a roof height subordinate to existing and a cementitious finish distinguishable from the historic structure. - Windows: Staff recommended repairing existing wood windows rather than replacing with aluminum; the proposed aluminum units did not meet historic specifications. - Doors: Staff recommended against filling the two front doors, instead maintaining the historic two-door configuration (one original, one a later addition) and repairing them. Applicant argued that the windows are inefficient and need replacement, that the secondary door is not original (based on framing evidence), and that filling the door opening with stone would create a cleaner look. During deliberation, commissioners noted: - The existing wood windows are largely repairable; energy efficiency can be improved with storm windows or weatherstripping. - The two-door configuration appears historic per Sanborn maps, and the addition of a stone infill would remove a character-defining feature. - The roof of the proposed addition should be redesigned to avoid a prominent peak visible from the street. A motion was made to continue the item to a site visit to examine the doors, windows, and roof design in person. The motion passed unanimously (9-0). Item 5 – 293 Lovera Boulevard (Case 2025-153) Applicant Jocelyn (appearing virtually) sought approval to: 1. Fill two side doors with stone to match existing stone veneer. 2. Replace the roof with metal (later retracted; will use tile shingles). 3. Install a 4-foot-high metal fence in front. Staff recommendations: - Doors: Not approve filling both doors; instead, replace the farthest door with a window (since it appears to be a later addition) and retain the middle door as original. - Roof: Approved per general metal roof guidelines (applicant withdrew metal request, will use tile). - Fence: Continue until a site plan and fence design are submitted. Applicant argued both doors were added later (framing evidence) and that filling them with matching stone would improve aesthetics. Commissioners noted that Sanborn maps show both doors as original, and removing them would be contrary to preservation guidelines. A compromise was suggested: retain the doors in place (sealed from inside) or replace the farthest door with a window. The commission approved the motion as modified: - Deny the request to fill both doors; if the applicant returns with a proposal to replace the farthest door with a window meeting window standards, that may be considered. - Continue the fence item to the next meeting pending submission of a site plan. Key Outcomes - Consent calendar: Approved unanimously. - Item 4 (838 Magnolia Ave): Continued to a site visit (date to be scheduled by staff); applicant must work with staff on window repair options, roof design, and door retention. - Item 5 (293 Lovera Blvd): - The request to fill both side doors was denied. The applicant may return with a plan to replace the farthest door with a window. - The metal roof request was withdrawn; tile roof will follow general guidelines. - The fence request was continued to the next available meeting pending a site plan showing fence location and simple design. - Voting tallies for both contested items were unanimous (9-0). - No permits were issued; certificates of appropriateness will be prepared following final approvals.

This meeting of the Building Related Fire Codes Appeals Advisory Board was called to order at 10:32 AM on July 2, 2025, by Chairman Jack Upmore. A quorum was present. The primary business included approval of prior meeting minutes, an appeal hearing regarding a 60-day suspension of a plumbing registration, and an update on board vacancies and term limits. Consent Calendar - Minutes Approval: The board unanimously approved the meeting minutes from November 15, 2024, and December 6, 2024, by voice vote with a motion from Robert Hanley and a second. Discussion Items - Appeal of 60-Day Suspension of Plumbing Registration (Juan Oliveras): - The city presented its case, led by new board liaison Rachel Parrish. The suspension stemmed from an incident on June 12, 2025, at 115 Hardaman. Inspector Joe Hernandez arrived for a rough-end and top-out inspection and found two unlicensed individuals (later identified as Carlos and Miguel) installing a shower valve. The workers initially claimed to be framers but eventually fled after contacting Martin Martinez, who said he worked for Anytime Plumbing. City inspectors confirmed that Martin Martinez was previously linked to Anytime Plumbing and that this was a repeated violation. - Juan Oliveras, the appellant and master plumber with Anytime Plumbing, stated he was not on site and that the workers were not his employees. He argued that the property owner, Ramiro Romero, had instructed his own workers (including Miguel Martinez) to move the shower head without his knowledge. Romero confirmed that he had asked his workers to raise the shower head, believing it was a simple repair not requiring a permit. - Board members noted conflicting stories and questioned the chain of responsibility. Inspector Hernandez testified that the workers were actively performing plumbing work (using press tools and fittings) and that the job was only about 50% complete, contrary to claims of a simple repair. - After deliberation, John Martin moved to uphold the suspension as issued and deny the appeal. The motion was seconded and passed by voice vote (all in favor, none opposed). - Board Vacancies and Term Limits Update: - Rachel Parrish reported that all current board members’ terms have expired and they are serving in holdover status. New applications for board positions will be accepted until August 31, 2025. A new city council sunset committee (not yet formed) will interview applicants. Members expressed concern about term limits (three consecutive two-year terms) and the restriction that board members cannot apply for city projects. Discussion included possible clarifications on whether moving from alternate to primary resets the term clock. Rachel agreed to seek a city attorney opinion and follow up with the board. Key Outcomes - Appeal Denied: The board voted unanimously (all ayes, no opposition) to uphold the 60-day suspension of Juan Oliveras’ plumbing registration. - Board Vacancy Process: Applications will be open until August 31, 2025, with interviews by a future sunset committee. The board liaison will clarify term-limit rules and the ability to modify board bylaws. - Meeting Adjourned: The meeting adjourned shortly after 11:30 AM following a motion to adjourn.

The meeting was called to order at 10:33 AM on July 2, 2025, with a quorum present. The board approved the minutes from November 15 and December 6, 2024, and heard a brief introduction from a new city liaison. The principal agenda item was an appeal hearing for a 60-day suspension of plumbing contractor Juan Oliveras. Following testimony from the appellant, property owner, and city inspectors, the board voted to uphold the suspension. The meeting concluded with a discussion on board vacancies and term limits. Consent Calendar - Minutes Approval: The board unanimously approved the meeting minutes from November 15, 2024, and December 6, 2024. (Motion by Robert Hendley, seconded) Appeal of 60-Day Plumbing Registration Suspension (Juan Oliveras / Anytime Plumbing) - City Staff Presentation: City staff presented the case background. An initial 30-day suspension was issued on April 2, 2025, for working without permits. The 60-day suspension under appeal stemmed from a May 29, 2025, inspection at 1511 Hartmann. City Plumbing Supervisor Danny Poor and Inspector Joe Hernández testified. Inspector Hernández stated he observed unlicensed workers Carlos and Miguel actively installing a shower valve and connecting water lines. When questioned, the workers fled the scene but later identified themselves as working for Anytime Plumbing under a supervisor named Martin Martinez. Mr. Poor testified this was the third time in 2025 that Anytime Plumbing workers had been caught working without a license under the same supervisor. - Appellant Testimony (Juan Oliveras): Mr. Oliveras denied responsibility, stating he was not on site and the workers were not his employees. He argued he was being unfairly penalized for work he did not authorize or oversee. - Property Owner Testimony (Ramiro Salgado): Mr. Salgado acknowledged the workers on site were his own employees performing framing and fixture work without a license. He accepted full responsibility for the violation and expressed regret for not hiring a licensed plumber like Mr. Oliveras. - Board Deliberation: Board members John Martin, Mark Ross, Brian Smith, and George Salina heavily scrutinized the conflicting accounts between the appellant/property owner and the city inspectors. The board focused on the legal responsibility of the master plumber for all work conducted under their registration. Board Vacancies and Term Limits - Update from Liaison: City liaison Rachel updated the board on vacancies, noting that all current members' official terms had expired and they were serving in a holdover capacity. A call for new candidates was announced. - Term Limit Interpretation: A discussion ensued regarding the maximum allowable terms (three consecutive terms or six years). Members questioned whether alternates could transition to principal roles without a full reapplication process. Rachel agreed to consult with the city attorney to provide a formal written interpretation of the rules. Key Outcomes - Appeal Denied: The board voted to deny the appeal of the 60-day suspension of Juan Oliveras' plumbing registration. The motion was made by John Martin, seconded, and passed by a voice vote. The suspension is upheld. - Legal Clarification on Terms: The city liaison will seek a legal interpretation from the city attorney regarding term limit rules for board members. - Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent.

The Historic and Design Review Commission (HDRC) met on Wednesday, July 2, 2025, with Chairman J. Maurice Gibbs presiding. The commission addressed five agenda items, including a consent calendar, public comments, and two contested cases requiring site visits or continuances. Consent Calendar - Three items were approved unanimously: 9800 Airport Boulevard, 228 Lavaca, and 717 Burrlison Street. A voicemail from the Conservation Society of San Antonio regarding the 9800 Airport Boulevard item was played but did not result in any item being pulled from consent. Public Comments & Testimony - Betty Boucher (via voicemail, on behalf of the Conservation Society of San Antonio): Expressed concern about the San Antonio Airport Badge and ID Building 1322, urging the city to retain the mid-century modern structure with its wave-like folded plate roof. The speaker noted the building was excluded from the current application but asked for creative solutions through the Section 106 review. - Barbara Whithow (in-person, representing River Road Historic District): Submitted a letter supporting the Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) staff recommendations for the 838 East Magnolia Avenue case. Discussion Items 838 East Magnolia Avenue (Item 4): Applicant Ivan Solis and homeowner Michael Salazar proposed a 605-square-foot one-story rear addition, replacement of all wood windows with one-over-one aluminum windows, and infill of one front door. OHP staff recommended reducing the addition's ridge height to be subordinate, using wood or fiber cement siding with a vertical trim piece to distinguish the addition, retaining historic wood windows (which staff found to be in good condition after a June 24 site visit), and preserving the two-door front configuration. The applicant argued for a seamless addition, energy-efficient windows, and infilling the door they believed was a later addition. The commission voted to send the case to a site visit (DRC) to further evaluate the front door, window replacement options, and ridge height visibility. 293 Levera Boulevard (Item 5): Applicant Hassan proposed infilling two side doors with stone, replacing the roof with standing seam metal (withdrawn during the meeting—applicant will install composition shingle in kind), and installing a four-foot-tall black metal fence with gates. OHP staff recommended only infilling the middle door (based on historic maps showing both doors as original) and preserving the furthest door or replacing it with a window; the fence was recommended for approval contingent on a site plan. The commission approved the motion to: (1) approve as staff recommended (middle door infill allowed, furthest door preserved or replaced with a window meeting standards), (2) note the roof request was withdrawn, and (3) continue the fence request for 90 days until a site plan is submitted. Key Outcomes - Consent agenda approved unanimously (9-0). - 838 East Magnolia Avenue: Motion to send to a site visit (DRC) carried unanimously (9-0). - 293 Levera Boulevard: Motion to approve item 1 as staff recommended, item 2 withdrawn, and item 3 continued for 90 days for a fence site plan, carried unanimously (9-0).