Public Meetings - Alameda County, California

The Alameda County Board of Supervisors met on July 15, 2026, for a full-day meeting that included morning proclamations, a public hearing on a historic tax-defaulted property transfer, and numerous votes on ordinances, contracts, and resolutions. The meeting also featured public comments on housing, transportation, and firearm safety, and concluded with multiple adjournments in memory of community members. Consent Calendar - Items 112 through 122 were approved unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - John Jones the third (in-person, on closed session items) honored former Supervisor Scott Haggerty, recalling his human connection and encouragement. - Simeu Raimi (in-person, on closed session) spoke about disability access, housing as a human right, and homelessness. - David Hall (Centro Legal de la Raza) supported item 53 (Alameda County Housing Secure Program), noting its importance in preventing evictions and homelessness. - Eugene Nishinaga (former BART manager) spoke in support of item 46 (CyberTran resolution), describing the automated direct transport system as revolutionary. - Aisha Knowles (Russell City descendant) urged expedited redress for former Russell City residents, noting recent deaths. - Carmen Jovel (East Bay Community Law Center) supported item 53, emphasizing the cost-saving benefits of eviction defense. - Tara Clancy (mobile home resident) supported item 54 (mobile home legal aid contract) and called for a mobile home park closure ordinance. - Anne (Pleasanton resident) supported item 42 (safe storage ordinance), citing data on child shootings. - Shirley Lewandowski (Dublin resident, Mom's Demand Action) supported item 42, citing 2026 unintentional child shootings. - Darby Hatfield (Oakland youth) spoke on item 4 (CalFresh), urging full staffing of the benefits hotline and outreach to prevent loss of benefits for 27,000 residents. - Patrick Messick (East Bay Broadband Consortium) supported item 4, noting broadband access challenges for CalFresh recertification. - Peter Clark (Oakland transportation advisor) supported item 46 (CyberTran), citing its potential for freight movement. - Kristen Hackett (Mobilehome In-Place) supported item 54, describing abuse of 7-day notices by park owners. - Lindsay Wright (Del Rio mobile home resident) supported item 54, highlighting the need for legal representation and a closure ordinance. - Kelly (non-agenda public comment) criticized the board's public comment process and recusal practices. Discussion Items - Supervisors' Remarks: Supervisor Fortunato Bass announced an Ad Hoc committee meeting on immigration enforcement and recognized two individuals killed by immigration enforcement. Supervisor Tam announced a joint health/public protection committee meeting and requested adjournments in memory of Jose Cota and Jesse Mae Patterson Johnson. Supervisor Marquez reported on a town hall with Senator Grayson about wildfire preparedness and announced that item 11 (Russell City Redress Fund) was pulled to August 4. President Halbert pulled item 84.1 for discussion and thanked Butler Amusements for fair tickets. - Proclamations: The board proclaimed July 19–25, 2026 as Pretrial, Probation, and Parole Supervision Week; July 17, 2026 as Love Letters to Our Bodies Day of Renewal; and commended the 100 Black Men of the Bay Area for their youth mentorship and community work. - Chapter 8 Sale of 8215 MacArthur Blvd: A public hearing was held on the proposed sale of a tax-defaulted vacant lot to Black Cultural Zone Community Development Corporation for $10, to develop affordable housing. The appraised value was $9,000, with redemption value over $1.7 million. The board approved the sale unanimously (5-0). - Item 46 – Resolution Supporting CyberTran: Supervisor Miley moved a resolution supporting an ultra-light rail transit system for freight movement from the Port of Oakland, reducing truck traffic on I-880. The resolution passed unanimously. - Item 42 – Safe Storage of Firearms Ordinance: First reading and introduction of an ordinance requiring trigger locks or lock boxes for firearms in unincorporated areas. Passed unanimously. - Item 84.1 – Renaming of Amador Pavilion: The board voted to rename the Amador Pavilion at the fairgrounds as the Scott Haggerty Amador Pavilion in memory of the former supervisor. Passed unanimously. - Item 83 – Appointment of Chief Information Officer: The board appointed Timothy Flanagan as CIO, effective September 13, 2026, at a biweekly salary of $11,211. - Item 75 & 76 – Salary Ordinance and MOU: Second reading of salary ordinance amendments and first reading of MOU with Alameda County Management Association Sheriff's Sworn Units were approved. Key Outcomes - Litigation Report: County Council reported that the board authorized retention of outside counsel for Irvin v. County (unanimous vote on June 4) and Dykes v. County (unanimous vote on June 30, with Supervisor Miley excused). - Consent Calendar and Mass Motion: Approved, with items 8 and 56 passed after President Halbert recused himself, and item 48 passed after Supervisor Miley recused himself. - Recusals: Supervisor Miley recused from item 48 (United Seniors) and President Halbert recused from items 8 and 56 (potential financial conflicts). - Adjournments: The meeting was adjourned in memory of former Supervisor Scott Haggerty, Mark Crawford (chair of Alameda County Planning Commission), Jose Cota, and Jesse Mae Patterson Johnson (former Russell City residents).

The Personnel Administration and Legislation (PAL) Committee met on July 14, 2026, with Chair Tam presiding and Supervisors Perdonado and Bortunato present. The committee received federal and state legislative updates, voted to oppose two EPA rulemakings on PFAS, and approved sending a letter of support for a $10 million state appropriation for the Oakport Campus project. Federal Legislative Update - Emily DeSilva and Curtis Erdman reported that the 21st Century Road to Housing Act became law over the weekend; President Trump did not sign nor veto in protest of the Save Act stalling. Discussed the passing of Senator Lindsey Graham and absence of Senator Mitch McConnell, leaving Senate Republicans two votes short (51-47). The Senate Appropriations Committee cannot mark up bills without McConnell; posted drafts instead. House floor remains blocked by conservative holdouts over the Save Act; leadership will attempt a third time this week. OMB requested a $67 billion supplemental for the Iran conflict, but the legislative vehicle is unsettled—Speaker Johnson favors reconciliation, Leader Thune prefers a standalone measure. Chair Tam commented that $4.3 billion for HUD nationwide contrasts with $67 billion for war, saying "our priorities are not where they're supposed to be." State Legislative Update - Vanessa Flores of Full Moon Strategies reported that the state legislature is on summer recess until August 3. Governor Newsom signed budget bills including SB 177 (Fair Share from Big Corporations Act) requiring the Department of Finance to present options for holding large corporations accountable for healthcare costs of employees on Medi-Cal. Three propositions will appear on the ballot: Prop 2 (increases rainy day fund deposits to 20% and allows spending on unemployment debt), Prop 3 (extends high-income tax rates to fund education and healthcare, generating $5-15 billion/year), and Prop 40 (one-time 5% wealth tax on billionaires for health and food assistance). Supervisor Tam noted Assemblymember Bonta's AB 40 (Community First Coal Review Act) is in Senate Appropriations, set for hearing August 3. The committee did not formally adopt a position on AB 40. Discussion Items Opposition to EPA Rulemakings on PFAS - The Alameda County Health Department requested the committee oppose two EPA actions: extending the compliance deadline for PFOS maximum contaminant levels, and rescinding regulatory determinations for four PFAS substances. Chair Tam cited concern over groundwater levels in the Tri-Valley. A motion to send opposition to the full board was made and seconded. Vote: Supervisor Bortunato aye, Supervisor Tam aye. Motion passed. Support for State Funding for Oakport Campus Project - Benito Delgado Olson, Executive Director of Supplybank.org, presented a request from Supplybank.org and EBMUD for the committee to support Assemblymember Bonta's $10 million appropriation request for phase one of the Oakport Campus in East Oakland. The project would create a climate-resilient industrial hub for emergency response supplies and support EBMUD operations and job training. Funds are targeted from GGRF and Prop 4, not general funds. A motion to send a letter of support to the full board was made and seconded. Vote: ayes, motion passed. Key Outcomes - The committee voted unanimously to refer opposition to the two EPA PFAS rulemakings to the full Board of Supervisors. - The committee voted unanimously to authorize sending a letter of support for Assemblymember Bonta's $10 million appropriation request for the Oakport Campus project to the full Board of Supervisors. - No public comments were made on items not on the agenda. - Meeting adjourned.

The Health Committee, chaired by Supervisor Miley and including Supervisor Tam, met to receive an update from Jonathan Russell, Director of Alameda County Health's Housing and Homelessness Services, on the Continuum of Care (COC) 2026 Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO). The presentation detailed significant federal policy changes that will reduce the amount of guaranteed funding for existing projects and create a large set-aside for new transitional housing and supportive services, potentially requiring Alameda County to identify alternative funding for at least $26 million in current services. Consent Calendar - No consent calendar items were discussed. Public Comments & Testimony - No public speakers were present for the agenda item or for non-agendized items. Discussion Items - Presentation by Jonathan Russell: He explained the COC funding process, noting that the annual NOFO distributes $4.3 billion nationally. Alameda County currently receives approximately $64.5 million in COC funding across 47 grants, supporting over 2,100 housing units and 3,200 beds. Key changes for 2026 include: (1) only 60% of existing projects can be placed in the protected Tier 1 (down from 90% in prior years), (2) a $1.3 billion set-aside (roughly one-third of total funding) exclusively for new transitional housing and supportive services projects in Tier 2, and (3) renewal projects cannot be placed in Tier 2, meaning any project not ranked in the top 60% must be funded with other sources or closed. HUD also retains broad discretionary authority to reject applications or grantees. - Supervisor Tam's questions: She asked about the number of beds at risk and the impact on coordinated entry and HMIS. Russell replied that most permanent supportive housing rental assistance would be protected, but several hundred beds in transitional and youth rapid rehousing could be lost, along with system infrastructure. He emphasized that coordinated entry and HMIS are being deprioritized to preserve rental assistance. Supervisor Tam also asked about communication with providers; Russell noted they have met with all 47 grantees and are actively recruiting new projects. - Supervisor Miley's comments: He expressed concern about the worst-case scenario (zero funding) and asked about preparation. Russell outlined four scenarios and said the county has budgeted roughly $20 million per year from Measure W for federal backfill, but a total loss would require a threefold expansion of that plan. Russell also noted administrative challenges: absorbing 19 new non-county grants and staffing impacts. Supervisor Miley requested a roadmap for different possibilities and commended staff for their work. He also discussed the nature of the litigation—a lawsuit filed July 2, 2026, challenging the NOFO under the Administrative Procedures Act, similar to a successful 2025 lawsuit. Supervisor Miley criticized the national funding level of $4.3 billion as “disgraceful” and emphasized that local Measure W is essential but insufficient without federal support. Key Outcomes - The presentation was informational; no votes were taken. - The local application process closes on July 17, 2026, at 5 p.m. - The COC Leadership Board will meet on August 11, 2026, to approve the final project priority list. - The consolidated application to HUD is due by August 26, 2026, though the federal portal is not yet open. - Staff will identify the $26 million in projects that cannot be renewed and bring a proposal to the Board for alternative funding, likely using Measure W reserves. - The committee acknowledged the need to prepare for the worst-case scenario of total funding loss, which would require immediate emergency funding for all 47 grants. - The new lawsuit (filed July 2, 2026) may affect the process, but staff cannot rely on it and must proceed as if the NOFO will be implemented.

The Alameda County Board of Supervisors held a planning meeting on July 10, 2026, at 17:45 UTC. The board approved the consent calendar, adopted a general plan amendment to comply with Senate Bill 1425, and heard an appeal regarding code enforcement violations on a property in Castro Valley. The board voted to uphold the West County Board of Zoning Adjustments' decision and deny the appeal, with one abstention. Consent Calendar - Item 3: Approval of Record of Cost Abatement and Authorized Assessment Liens – The board approved the consent calendar unanimously (4-0, with Supervisor Fortunato Bas excused). Supervisor Tam raised a clarifying question about a property address listed as Mountain House, which may be in San Joaquin County. Staff agreed to verify the location. Discussion Items - Item 4: General Plan Amendment for SB 1425 Compliance – Planning staff presented a resolution to amend the Open Space Element to incorporate existing policies addressing equitable access to open space, climate resilience, and rewilding, as required by SB 1425. Staff noted that the county is already compliant and the amendment is an administrative update. The item had been reviewed by multiple advisory committees and the Planning Commission. The board passed the motion unanimously (4-0, with Supervisor Fortunato Bas excused). - Supervisor Miley questioned the motivation for SB 1425 and whether the county was in violation of the January 1, 2026 deadline. County Counsel stated scheduling delays caused the delay, but adoption was the best course. - Supervisor Marquez asked about the 20% canopy cover goal by 2050; staff described a grant-funded urban forest plan underway. - Supervisor Marquez also expressed concern about the timeline from staff completion to board action, urging better compliance. - Public comment: Charmi Upper, Griffin, Arjun Zutaria, Gerald, Carol Gabani, and Dave spoke. Some supported the amendment, while others raised concerns about agricultural land use policies and the balance between conservation and housing needs. - Item 5: Continued to September 17, 2026 – At the request of Supervisor Miley, this item was continued for two months. - Item 6: Appeal of Michael Chase and Gia Son Ageda – Code Enforcement Violations at 8950 Crow Canyon Road, Castro Valley – The property owner appealed the West County Board of Zoning Adjustments' (BZA) decision declaring the property in violation of multiple zoning and neighborhood preservation ordinances. The 44.3-acre A-zoned parcel had no permitted residential use; alleged violations included unpermitted storage, commercial vehicle parking, RVs used as dwellings, cargo containers, accumulated debris, unpermitted solar panels, and a bridge over a creek. Staff presented evidence from inspections, including a warrant-authorized inspection in October 2025. The owner's attorney argued the enforcement was complaint-driven by a neighbor with a personal dispute, that the county's procedures were flawed, and that the property was used for grazing. The board heard from the State Water Resources Control Board, which confirmed ongoing investigations for unauthorized creek fill. The board voted 4-0-1 (President Haubert abstained) to uphold the BZA decision, deny the appeal, and impose fines and fees totaling $1,483 (a $250 zoning fine, $193 reinspection fee, $268 administrative fee, and $772 warrant cost). Staff was directed to work with the owner on a compliance plan. - Supervisor Miley expressed strong support for staff, noting the complaint-driven system and the need for enforcement. - Supervisor Marquez asked about the potential for a compliance plan with more than 30 days; staff confirmed flexibility. - President Haubert abstained, stating he had received ex parte communications and wanted to avoid prejudice. Public Comments & Testimony - Public Comment on Non-Agenda Items – Griffin spoke on Measure D, arguing that the 100-acre minimum parcel size and restrictions on farming intensity hinder agriculture and should be revisited. Key Outcomes - Consent Calendar (Item 3): Approved unanimously (4-0-1). - General Plan Amendment (Item 4): Approved unanimously (4-0-1) to comply with SB 1425. - Appeal (Item 6): Denied, BZA decision upheld. Fines and fees imposed. Compliance plan to be negotiated. - Item 5: Continued to September 17, 2026.

The Alameda County Board of Supervisors held a special meeting on July 9, 2026, to adopt the final budget for fiscal year 2026-2027. The meeting was a continuation from June 23, 2026. The board voted unanimously to approve a $6.7 billion balanced budget, closing a $184.8 million funding gap through expenditure reductions, revenue enhancements, and one-time strategies. Key actions included a $19.3 million allocation to Alameda Health System to prevent layoffs, support a performance audit, and extend a mental health program. Discussion Items - County Administrator's Budget Presentation: Susan Ranishy presented the final $6.7 billion budget (10% increase from prior year), supporting over 10,400 full-time equivalent positions. The general fund is $4.3 billion. The budget closes a $184.8 million funding gap via salary savings, elimination of funded vacancies, revenue maximization, and one-time retirement rate savings. Approximately 50% of the balancing solution relies on one-time savings. Key investments include $2.2 billion for salaries/benefits, $1.25 billion for contracts with community-based organizations, $440 million for housing/homelessness, $347 million in Measure W funds, and $795 million for capital projects. Ranishy also highlighted 125 efficiency actions yielding $114 million in savings, recognized by CSAC and NACo. - Alameda Health System (AHS) Recommendations: Supervisors Miley and Fortunato Bass introduced a joint letter with four recommendations: (1) a one-time allocation of up to $19.3 million to AHS to eliminate 92 remaining layoffs for FY 2026-27, (2) a performance audit of AHS by an outside firm, (3) extension of the PHP IOP program through October 31, 2026, and (4) direction for the CAO to explore employment for 28 PHP IOP staff if the program becomes infeasible within AHS. The ad hoc committee on AHS will continue and provide a status update by end of 2026. - Board Comments: - Supervisor Tam praised the efficiency achievements and improved engagement with unincorporated communities. She noted the $387 million unincorporated services budget. - Supervisor Marquez acknowledged the hard work and creativity, but stressed the need for honest conversations about future trade-offs, citing priorities like immigrant/refugee services, reparations, and infrastructure. - Supervisor Fortunato Bass emphasized the budget as a statement of values, protecting vulnerable residents. She highlighted progress on equity, transparency, and community engagement, and called for addressing the structural deficit through revenue measures such as updating the fee schedule and assessment appeals process. She clarified that the $19.3 million should not come from already-allocated Measure W funds, but hoped for creative solutions. - Supervisor Miley thanked all partners and reflected on his 26th budget as a supervisor. He noted that new challenges will arise and that the board may need to triage priorities. - President Halbert thanked the CAO and team, noted that Measure W funds are temporarily higher due to litigation backlog, and stressed prudent use going forward. Key Outcomes - Budget Adoption: The board adopted by resolution the final FY 2026-2027 budget for the County of Alameda, Alameda County Fire District, Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (excluding Zone 7), and County Service Area Districts. The motion was made by Supervisor Miley, seconded by Supervisor Marquez, and passed unanimously (5-0). - AHS Allocation and Actions: The board approved the joint letter recommendations, including the up to $19.3 million allocation to AHS, the performance audit, and extension of the mental health program. The CAO and Auditor Controller were authorized to make necessary adjustments. - Policy Priorities Reaffirmed: The board reaffirmed priorities including maintaining reserve levels (two months of general fund operating expenses), ongoing supplemental funding for senior services, continued operational efficiencies, redesign of special budgets (children's, human impacts), review of master fee schedule with emphasis on assessment appeals, and potential creation of new offices for immigrants/refugees, unincorporated area, reparations, and public safety oversight. - Continued Monitoring: The board committed to monitoring state and federal funding uncertainties, including impacts from HR1 and a ballot initiative on local taxes that could reduce county revenues by up to $2 billion statewide.

The Fairview Municipal Advisory Council (MAC) met on July 8, 2026, at 2:00 PM at the Castro Valley Library. The meeting covered traffic enforcement updates, public comments on a proposed housing development and regional transit funding, an informational presentation on the Unincorporated Urban Forest Plan, a detailed briefing on AC Transit’s financial crisis and potential service cuts, and the election of a new chair and vice chair. All votes were unanimous except for the excused absence of Chair Anglin. Public Comments & Testimony - Officer Jennifer Papst (CHP) reported on June enforcement: 28 traffic citations, 6 non-injury crashes, 1 injury crash, 1 DUI arrest, and 1 other misdemeanor arrest. She highlighted zero fatal crashes during the 4th of July enforcement period and noted speed limit changes in the area. Upcoming events: National Night Out (August 4), Start Smart classes (July 16 and 30), and an Age Well Drive Smart class (August 20). - Bruce King (Friends of San Lorenzo Creek) expressed concerns about a proposed 21-unit housing development on D Street. He stated that two ephemeral streams (wetlands) cross the property, that previous permits were never completed, and that the project was pulled back until water board, fish and wildlife, and Army Corps of Engineers agree on permit status. He questioned why the planning department presented plans without proper permits. - Mimi Dean spoke as a board member of Oro Loma Sanitary District, thanking Turner Communications for helping transition to district elections. She also noted as a private citizen that efforts to save the former Sky West golf course are progressing and a deal is expected soon, emphasizing the importance of accessible parks. - Brenda Clark urged residents to report fireworks violations under the new ordinance, noting that Hayward issued 41 citations this year. She also thanked the community for supporting Sky West. - Kelly Abrew referenced San Francisco Chronicle articles on discretionary grants (noting disparities between districts) and on Bay Area housing production, stating that only 14% of planned units have been built in the first three years of the eight-year cycle, projecting about 37% overall. - Public comment on May minutes: Kelly Abrew noted that the county counsel clarified that minutes are the official record, and that a directive had been issued for skeleton action minutes, which he argued reduces transparency. - Public comment on Urban Forest Plan: Bruce King supported the plan, noting the need for a tree inventory to enforce planting requirements, and urged canopy protection. Mimi Dean emphasized selecting the right trees for the right places and ensuring proper maintenance. - Public comment on AC Transit: None. - Public comment on chair/vice chair elections: Brenda Clark questioned the timing of announcing a vacancy (Todd Anglin’s resignation) and the reorganization, but staff clarified the resignation was accepted by the Board of Supervisors on July 6. Discussion Items Unincorporated Urban Forest Plan Project - Allie Albers (Planning Department) presented an update on the Calfire-funded $685,000 Urban Forest Plan project for Ashland, Cherryland, Hayward Acres, Fairview, San Lorenzo, and Castro Valley. The project includes a street tree inventory (starting in San Lorenzo, expected completion fall 2026), a canopy equity analysis, policy assessment, and a workforce development program (Growing Futures) in partnership with HARD, Merritt College, and the county. A community tree advisory group is being formed. The plan is targeted for adoption by February 2028. - Council members asked about conflicts with Calfire, the scope of the inventory (public right-of-way only, not private property), existing hazardous tree ordinances, and protections for trees on private property. Albers clarified that the inventory does not include private trees, but recommendations could emerge for future ordinances. The canopy analysis uses existing LIDAR data. The council expressed concerns about fire risk and community input, and Albers confirmed that Fairview input is welcome and that the plan will address fire risk through analysis and potential recommendations. AC Transit Deficit and Service Reduction Plan - Murphy McCauley (Board Director), Diane Castleberry (External Affairs), and Owen Christofferson (Transportation Planner) presented a briefing on AC Transit’s financial challenges. The agency faces a projected $200 million deficit over four years, with an annual funding gap of $50 million starting in 2027. Causes include the end of federal pandemic relief, flat sales tax revenue, and increased costs (fuel up 28%, parts 14%, new buses 35%). A contingency service plan would reduce service by up to 16% and lay off up to 300 employees if no new funding is secured by December 2026. - For Fairview, line 95 (D Street corridor) would see no changes, but adjacent lines 28, 60, and 93 would face frequency reductions to 60 minutes and reduced hours. The plan preserves the primary route network. A public hearing is scheduled for October 14, 2026; the board will vote on December 9, 2026, with changes effective June 13, 2027 if the Connect Bay Area Act (SB 63) is not approved. SB 63 would generate $980 million annually for Bay Area transit, with AC Transit receiving $52 million per year. - Council members asked about route labeling, the public hearing process, and the impact on underserved communities. Vice Chair Rhodes noted that Fairview is already underserved and that cuts would exacerbate inequities. The presenters encouraged community engagement and coalition-building with schools and community organizations to advocate for long-term funding. McCauley mentioned interest in microtransit for less dense areas when finances allow. Key Outcomes - Approval of May Minutes (Action): Motion to approve the May 2026 minutes passed unanimously (4-0, Chair Anglin excused) after public comment. - Election of Chair and Vice Chair (Action): - Councilmember Sally Higgins was nominated and elected as Chair (4-0, excused absent). - Councilmember Vanessa Rhodes was nominated and elected as Vice Chair (4-0, excused absent). - Staff announcements: Ashley (staff) announced an Eden Area senior town hall (July 10), a Healthy Living Festival (Sept 24), and a vacancy on the Fairview MAC due to Todd Anglin’s resignation. Applications are being accepted. Other Items - Vice Chair’s Report: Noted the start of East Bay MUD’s Zoro cluster pipeline replacement (six-month project on Modoc Road and other roads), the fireworks ordinance with fines up to $1,000, and unresolved issues with stop sign and road striping on D Street. - Council Member Comments: Sally Higgins mentioned the 2nd Street sidewalk project, and promoted a Veterans Day event (Nov 8) at Lone Tree Cemetery. Beth Farmer had no comments. Chris Philbin briefly noted a housing element subcommittee meeting but was reminded that subcommittee updates require prior agenda placement. Meeting adjourned.

The Alameda County Board of Supervisors met on July 1, 2026, to address a wide range of items including the appointment of a new Chief Information Officer, a contract extension for foster youth services, the dissolution of a community services area, the receipt of the Reparations Commission report, and a contentious extension of the Flock surveillance technology contract. The meeting lasted from approximately 9:00 AM to after 6:00 PM and included extensive public testimony. Consent Calendar - Minutes Approval: Approved minutes from special meetings on January 16, January 21, June 16, and the regular meeting and budget hearing on June 18, 2026. - Consent Calendar: Items 80 through 93 were approved unanimously after a correction in numbering. Public Comments & Testimony - Castlewood CSA (Item 74): Multiple residents spoke in opposition to the dissolution of the Castlewood Community Services Area, citing mismanagement by Public Works, a 172% rate increase, a $1.4 million loan, and safety risks from unplugged backup generators. They urged the board to vote no or abstain. - Reparations Commission (Items 77 & 78): Over 40 speakers, including commissioners, community members, and organization representatives, expressed strong support for accepting the Reparations Commission report and implementing its recommendations. Speakers highlighted historical and ongoing systemic harms and urged the board to act. - Flock Contract (Item 79): Approximately 50 public comments were divided: opponents cited data breaches, civil liberties violations, racial profiling, and the company's track record; supporters emphasized public safety benefits, especially in unincorporated areas, and cited recovered stolen vehicles and solved crimes. Discussion Items - Item 6 – Foster Youth Services Contract: The Social Services Agency requested a two-year extension with The Refuge to continue short-term residential therapeutic care for foster youth ages 12-18. Supervisor Fortunato Bass moved to extend the contract for up to 12 months and issue an RFP to seek additional providers. The motion passed unanimously. - Item 74 – Castlewood CSA Dissolution: Public Works Director Daniel Desenberg explained the financial challenges of the self-funded CSA, proposed a zero-interest interaccount loan to cover a $1.4 million deficit, and recommended initiating dissolution via LAFCO. After debate, the board bifurcated the vote. Items A–E (policy direction including dissolution) passed 3-1-1 (Marquez, Tan, Fortunato Bass yes; Miley abstain; Halbert no). Items F–G (appropriations) failed 3-1-1 (needed four-fifths; Marquez, Tan, Fortunato Bass yes; Miley abstain; Halbert no). - Item 77 & 78 – Reparations Commission: The board received the final report from the Alameda County Reparations Commission, which included 44 recommendations across 12 focus areas. The commission chair Deborah Gore and others presented the findings. After emotional testimony, the board voted unanimously to receive the report, sunset the commission effective June 30, 2026, and establish a standing committee of the Board of Supervisors to advance implementation. - Item 79 – Flock Safety Contract Extension: The Sheriff's Office sought a $2.4 million contract extension combining ALPR, pan-tilt-zoom cameras, and drone first responder services. County Counsel detailed additional provisions on data ownership, restrictions on federal access, and audit rights. Secure Justice submitted 10 recommended amendments. After lengthy debate, a substitute motion to approve the contract as presented (with future RFP process) passed 3-2 (Miley, Tam, Halbert yes; Marquez, Fortunato Bass no). Key Outcomes - CIO Appointment: Timothy Flanagan was announced as the new Chief Information Officer, effective September 13, 2026, pending formal approval on July 14. - Foster Youth Contract: Extended up to 12 months; RFP to be issued. - Castlewood CSA: A–E approved (interaccount loan, dissolution process); F–G failed (no appropriations). - Reparations Commission: Report received, commission sunset, standing committee established. - Flock Contract: Approved ($2,421,832) for ALPR, PTZ cameras, and drone services through December 31, 2027. Future contract will be subject to RFP and further community engagement.

This meeting of the Unincorporated Services Committee, chaired by Supervisor Miley, addressed two informational items: the Fiscal Year 26-27 Proposed Budget and the Sheriff's Office Real Time Information Center (RTIC) contract. Public comment covered proposed budget transparency, RTIC technology concerns and support, and non-agendized topics including extra utility fees, a community garden, and airport development. No votes were taken, but directives were given for follow-up. Public Comments & Testimony - Budget Item: Ladidoa Salazar (Eden Voice) praised increased transparency but requested earlier community input and more demographic data. Anna Raschizo (Resources for Community Development) thanked staff and suggested holding budget presentations in the fall. Diane (call-in) asked whether state/federal aid offsets mandated programs. Lana Cross (San Lorenzo homeowner) requested a geographic breakout of spending. - RTIC Item: Keith Barrows (San Lorenzo) noted previous opposition came from outside the unincorporated area and urged approval. Dan Devini asked Supervisor Miley to champion the contract. Randy Wagi voiced full support. Lana (call-in) expressed concern about drone surveillance and asked about tracking transparency. Diane (San Lorenzo) supported the technology as a necessary tool. - Non-Agendized Items: Kristen Hackett (Eden Voice) reported that 84% of residents surveyed are paying new extra fees for garbage, water, and sewer (RUBS), causing displacement pressure; asked for an ordinance to ban such fees. Lindsay Lay echoed the same issue. Carmelita Lopez, Miguel de Leon (translated), and Sandy Frost (Empowering Families in Ashland) asked for continued stewardship of a community garden (La Huerta) on land near Fire Station 24. Lesbia Marones read testimony from Marta, a retiree with a disability, describing a $200/month extra fee and risk of eviction. Keith Barrows suggested that speakers identify their city of residence. Lana (San Lorenzo) requested help informing the community about Hayward Airport/SkyWest expansion plans. Randy Waggie noted illegal dumping on railroad property and suggested cameras. Nika (Liberty Town Homes resident) described unfair utility charges of over $500/month and asked for their removal. Discussion Items - Fiscal Year 26-27 Proposed Budget: Melanie Atendito (County Administrator's Office) presented a balanced $6.7 billion all-funds budget ($4.3 billion general fund), closing an initial $185 million gap through $93.4 million in one-time pension savings and $91.4 million in departmental adjustments. She highlighted 65% reliance on state/federal revenue, structural funding challenges, and unincorporated area investments including $70 million for roads, $65 million for fire protection, and $37 million for sheriff patrol. Measure W Essential County Services Fund allocates $151 million, with 30% benefiting unincorporated areas. Supervisor Miley noted improvements in transparency and governance, affirmed multiple engagement channels (MACs, budget work group), and emphasized that cities have more revenue-raising ability. He directed continued enhancement of the unincorporated special budget section. - Sheriff's Office Real Time Information Center (RTIC): A Sheriff's Office Sergeant presented a request for an 18-month bridge contract (to be voted on by the Board of Supervisors June 30) to maintain existing technology: Flock automated license plate readers, pan-tilt-zoom cameras, and drone first responder program (Raven), all integrated into a single platform. Case studies from the past two months showed successful resolution of an attempted kidnapping, a shooting of a 14-year-old, and recovery of stolen county vehicles. The contract includes data privacy protections (no federal sharing, no national data lookups, transparency portal). The Sergeant noted that all other Alameda County jurisdictions have this technology and unincorporated areas would be left without coverage if not renewed. Supervisor Miley expressed strong support, citing public safety benefits and safeguards, and pledged to champion the contract. Key Outcomes - Budget: No action taken by the committee. The Board of Supervisors is scheduled to adopt the FY 26-27 budget on June 26 (as referenced in the transcript). The CAO will continue to enhance the unincorporated budget section and may present follow-up information to the MACs. - RTIC Contract: No action taken by the committee. The contract will be considered by the Board of Supervisors on June 30. Supervisor Miley stated he would vote in favor. - Non-Agendized Items: Supervisor Miley directed that an informational report on extra utility fees (RUBS/junk fees) be agendized for the next Unincorporated Services Committee meeting on July 24. He noted he would work with the Empowering Families in Ashland group regarding the community garden lot but provided no immediate commitment. He acknowledged the airport issue is in Supervisor Tam's district and suggested it could be agendized by her office.

Note: The transcript indicates the meeting occurred on June 18, 2026, but the provided metadata specifies June 24, 2026. This summary uses the metadata date as instructed. The Alameda County Elections Commission met on June 24, 2026, to receive updates on recent elections, discuss youth voting initiatives, review memoranda of understanding (MOUs) for ranked-choice voting and general election services, and begin drafting a post-election assessment. The meeting included reports from the Registrar of Voters (ROV), four ad hoc committees, and public comments. Consent Calendar - The meeting began with roll call, establishing a quorum. The agenda was approved by acclamation. Meeting minutes were approved by motion (Commissioner Lindsay, seconded by Commissioner Butter) without objection. Announcements & Communications - Commissioner Butter raised a question about the administration's request for California voter rolls; it was suggested he agendize the topic for a future meeting. - Commissioner Barley reported receiving two ballots for her district (special election and general) and had correctly handled them. - Commissioner Lindsay praised staff for including video timestamps in the minutes and for adding live links to attachments in agenda packets. - Chair Dieter clarified speaking times (3 minutes) for public comments and noted a correction to the agenda regarding that. Monthly Update from the Registrar of Voters (ROV) - June 2 Primary: Approximately 42% turnout, described as “very good” for a midterm. Alameda County led large counties in turnout percentage. Processing is winding down, with only cured ballots remaining (ballots missing signatures or with mismatched signatures). - June 16 Election: An update was posted at 4 p.m. on the day of the meeting. All ballots received to date have been processed. Next update scheduled for June 24, with certification on June 25. The expedited timeline is on track. - Commissioners commended the ROV for outreach (signs at BART, freeways, “thank you for voting” messaging) and rapid response to ballot box overflow issues. Public Comments & Testimony - Preston Jordan, Albany City Councilmember (agenda item 7B – Youth Participation): Expressed frustration that the ROV had not responded to the city’s requests for youth voting cost estimates since January 2026, despite multiple follow-ups. He stated the city cannot proceed with lowering the voting age without that information and asked for the commission’s help. The ROV clarified that the formal request from Albany Unified was recent and that they will provide an estimate before the next meeting. - Mark Nuñez (sp?), Berkeley City Clerk (agenda item 8B – General MOU): Supported creating a general MOU between the ROV and cities for election services, noting it would clarify shared expectations and cost structures. - Zach (agenda item 8B): Made a rambling statement referencing various legal codes and conspiracy theories; no clear position on the agenda item. Discussion Items Ad Hoc Committee Reports - Voting Participation (Commissioner Seabrook): Data collection is ongoing; after gathering data on African American voters, the committee is now seeking data on Hispanic and other demographics. A request has been made to a data-holding group. Met this month with limited progress. - Youth Participation (Commissioner Barley): The committee met and discussed Albany’s delay in implementing youth voting due to a pending cost estimate from the ROV. They plan to work with the ROV to create a cost chart for interested cities. Commissioner Butter asked to see the youth voting MOU; the ROV agreed to share it as a public document. Discussion included whether Fremont’s charter status affects its ability to adopt youth voting. The ROV stated the deadline for jurisdictions to decide on youth voting for the November election is June 30. For Albany Unified, a cost estimate will be provided by the end of the week. - Budgeting for Elections (Commissioner Wagner): No report; the committee has not met. Commissioner Wagner noted the complexity of the budget algorithm and proposed producing a plain-English explanation of the cost allocation process. - Rules and Procedures (Chair Dieter): Proposed additions to the commission’s rules were reviewed. Commissioners offered feedback, including suggestions to adjust language on remote participation and quorum, update contact information, and fix typos. The committee will continue refining the proposals. Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) MOU (Agenda Item 8A) - The ROV reported that an amended RCV MOU including Albany is awaiting final signatures after questions arose from existing jurisdictions. Negotiations are ongoing. - Commissioner Wagner expressed concern that non-RCV cities receive county cost-sharing, but RCV city costs are fully borne by the cities. The ROV explained that all jurisdictions pay allocated costs based on registered voters; the county pays only for county and state contests. - Motion: To refer the RCV MOU update to the Budgeting for Elections ad hoc committee, restricted to financial aspects. Passed (vote tally unclear from transcript, but motion carried). General MOU for Election Services (Agenda Item 8B) - Discussion about the lack of MOUs between the ROV and most jurisdictions (cities, school districts, special districts) for general election services. City clerks have requested an MOU since February 2025. - Motion: To recommend that the ROV enter into MOU discussions with city clerks and report back to the commission every two months. Passed (7 yes, 1 no – Commissioner Seabrook dissenting). Post-Election Assessment (Agenda Item 8C) - Chair Dieter presented draft ideas for the assessment. Commissioners suggested adding kudos for social media outreach, rapid response to ballot box overflow, and improvements in ballot processing speed (processing through election day and on Wednesday after the election). - Areas for improvement included clearer voter guide instructions, better labeling of “100% reporting” on the results website, and continued work on ballot box capacity. - Motion: To authorize the president and vice president to draft the post-election assessment and bring it back for approval at the next meeting. Passed unanimously. Key Outcomes - RCV MOU Referral: Referred to Budgeting for Elections ad hoc committee (finance scope) – motion carried. - General MOU Recommendation: Commission recommended the ROV begin MOU discussions with city clerks and provide bimonthly updates – passed 7-1. - Post-Election Assessment: President and Vice President authorized to draft; to be presented at next meeting – passed unanimously. - Youth Voting: ROV committed to providing a cost estimate to Albany Unified by end of week; the commission will follow up on progress. - Rules and Procedures: Committee will continue refining proposed rule additions based on commissioner feedback. Meeting adjourned at 6:41 p.m.