Public Meetings - Albemarle County, Virginia

The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors met on Wednesday, June 4, 2025, at 1:00 p.m. in Lane Auditorium. The meeting included a proclamation for National Gun Violence Awareness Day, a work session on the AC44 Comprehensive Plan chapters for Cultural Resources and Resilient Communities, public hearings on the FY25 budget amendment, and two special use permit applications (Living Earth School and Woolen Mills Industrial floodplain fill). The agenda was amended to pull item 9 (Albemarle Charlottesville Regional Jail Renovation Project Permanent Financing) for rescheduling. Consent Calendar - Approved as amended (item 8.2, Personnel Policy Amendments, was modified with minor cross-referencing corrections). Motion by Supervisor McKeel, second by Supervisor Malik, passed unanimously. - Items included routine approvals and information items. Public Comments & Testimony - Alison Webb (Rio District) expressed concern about cooperation between the Albemarle County Police Department and ICE, citing a FOIA request that revealed meetings between ACPD senior leadership and ICE officials. She stated that a detective accompanied Homeland Security agents to a home under the guise of a "wellness check" to locate unaccompanied alien children for possible deportation. - Drew Goodman (White Hall District) spoke in strong support of nature-based preschools, noting that only 5% of Albemarle County's land is zoned for development and that schools fall under commercial zoning, competing with for-profit businesses. He argued that nature preschools align with the Rural Areas Master Plan objective to protect natural resources. - Tom Lowe (Crozet) opposed the expansion of growth areas, claiming that studies for two intersections (Shadowville and Crozet) are a de facto expansion. He presented data showing that rural area development has occurred at 1.4 times the size of the Crozet growth area and that land use program losses to taxpayers averaged 20% per year over 17 years, totaling nearly $15 million on a $249 million investment. - Neil Williamson (Free Enterprise) opposed a historic preservation ordinance, arguing it tramples property rights and citing examples of restrictive rules that prevent homeowners from expanding or painting their houses. He noted that Monticello, a popular historic site, was preserved without such an ordinance. - Alicia Lenahan (Scottsville District) urged the board to embrace the sanctuary jurisdiction label, citing studies showing immigrants commit fewer crimes. She noted that Virginia has been identified as an immigration enforcement hotspot and criticized local governments for denying sanctuary policies. - Susan McCullough (Samuel Miller District) called on the board to be transparent about risks related to immigration enforcement, referencing recent court decisions stripping temporary protected status from Venezuelans and humanitarian parolees. She quoted Emma Lazarus's poem at the Statue of Liberty. Discussion Items - AC44 Cultural Resources Chapter Work Session: Planning managers Tanya Schwarzenegger and Margaret Maliszewski presented the chapter. Key points included an overlay study to set protection priorities, potential regulations, and questions about balancing property rights. Supervisors expressed concerns about the "devil in the details," the cost of incentives, and the risk of overregulation. Several supervisors noted the need for clearer definitions of cultural vs. historic vs. scenic resources. Supervisor Pruitt suggested including contemporary cultural resources like comics shops and arts venues. Supervisor McKeel raised concerns about the potential for historic preservation to be used to block needed infrastructure (e.g., cell towers, bypass roads). The board supported the concept of an overlay study but stressed narrow tailoring and the need for funding sources. - Resilient Community Crosswalk: Staff presented the decision to eliminate a standalone resilient community chapter, instead integrating content into Environmental Stewardship and Community Facilities chapters. Discussion included climate adaptation, flood resilience, fire hazard risk, urban agriculture, and community resilience hubs. Supervisors asked about groundwater measurement, fire prevention materials, and the life expectancy gap metric (action 1.1). - Living Earth School Special Use Permit (SP 2024-00022) & Special Exception (SE 2024-00031): The applicant proposed a camp for outdoor education on 287 acres near Walnut Creek Park, with up to 250 campers during summer and 100 during the rest of the year, plus six events of up to 500 attendees via shuttle. The Planning Commission recommended approval 6-0. Public speakers overwhelmingly supported the school, citing its 23-year safety record and mission. The board added a condition (12D) allowing the fire marshal to prohibit campfires during hazardous conditions after learning campfires are exempt from the county's open burning law. The special use permit and special exception were both approved. - Woolen Mills Industrial Floodplain Fill (SP 2024-00026): The applicant requested a special use permit to place fill on 1.496 acres of floodplain fringe to create a building pad for light industrial use (currently zoned LI). Staff and the applicant's engineer (Timmons Group) argued the fill would cause no rise in flood elevations due to a backwater condition where the Rivanna River controls water levels. FEMA issued a conditional letter of map revision. Numerous public speakers opposed the project, citing risks to neighboring homes, environmental degradation, and the precedent of filling floodplains. The board debated the engineering analysis, human impacts, and the feasibility of on-site stormwater treatment. The motion to approve failed on a 3-3 tie (Pruitt, Andrews, Malik opposed; Galloway, McKeel, Lapisto Kirtley in favor). The project is denied. - FY25 Budget Amendment Public Hearing: Ryan Davidson presented a $21.2 million budget amendment, including $2.4 million for health fund infusion, $6.2 million for school health fund contribution, and $7 million in capital funds from tax rate changes (half of FY25). The public hearing had no speakers, and the resolution was adopted. Key Outcomes - National Gun Violence Awareness Day Proclamation (June 6, 2025) adopted unanimously. - Consent Agenda approved as amended. - Appointments to Boards and Commissions: Approved: William Walsh, Waldo Jaquith, Trevor Henry, Bill Fritz (Broadband Authority); Ross Stevenson, Catherine Gayhard, Malon Muchargy (Historic Preservation Committee); Joanne Hoyle (JBAA); Jennifer Olson (Natural Heritage Committee); Ann Oliver, Dylan Henry, Henry Light, Judith Joyce (Pantops CAC). - Living Earth School Special Use Permit approved with conditions (including fire ring clear zone of 25 feet and new condition 12D). Special Exception for critical slopes disturbance also approved. - Woolen Mills Industrial Floodplain Fill denied (motion failed on 3-3 tie). - FY25 Budget Amendment approved. - Board-to-Board Meeting Schedule: Discussion of possibly reducing quarterly school board reports to twice a year; supervisors expressed preference for in-person quarterly reports. - Next Meeting: June 18, 2025, at 1:00 p.m. in Lane Auditorium.

The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors held a work session on May 28, 2025 at 2:00 PM in Room 241 to review the draft Transportation Chapter of the AC44 Comprehensive Plan. Deputy Director of Planning Kevin McDermott and Planning Manager Tonya Swartzendruber presented community input, planning commission feedback, and an overview of the chapter's objectives for both development and rural areas. The board discussed the distinct approaches for the two areas, the concept of a multimodal transportation plan, and specific action items. Discussion Items - Rural vs. Development Area Approaches: Board members generally agreed that different strategies are needed. Supervisor McKeel emphasized that rural roads serve local users beyond just getting to growth areas. Supervisor Mallek stressed that rural roads are not only for goods movement and that local users within rural areas are equally important. - Multimodal Transportation Plan: The board supported the idea of a multimodal transportation plan that integrates all modes (pedestrian, bicycle, transit, vehicular). Concerns were raised about potential duplication with existing regional planning efforts by CARTA and TJPDC. Supervisor Gallaway noted the need to coordinate with CARTA to avoid overlapping planning efforts. Supervisor LaPisto-Kirtley clarified that multimodal means equal consideration for all modes, not just transit. - Active Recreation on Rural Roads: Board members expressed support for investigating a program to support active recreation (walking, biking, running) on select rural roads, but with significant guardrails. Supervisor Gallaway wanted to ensure safety and prioritize essential trips over recreation. Supervisor Mallek noted that many users are local residents, not tourists, and that speeding is the primary safety issue. Supervisor LaPisto-Kirtley had concerns about safety on narrow rural roads where widening is infeasible and cars and bikes share the road. - Safety and Traffic Calming: Multiple supervisors raised concerns about speeding and the difficulty of enforcement. Supervisor Mallek called for more effective traffic calming measures beyond just reducing speed limits, such as structural changes like roundabouts, speed tables, and even art on crosswalks. Supervisor LaPisto-Kirtley noted that VDOT is conservative and resistant to change, but traffic calming is crucial. Supervisor McKeel mentioned that police often cannot enforce speed limits because there's no place to pull over. - Transit and Microtransit: The board discussed transit improvements, including microtransit. Supervisor Mallek expressed concern about the cost of free microtransit and supported means testing or fees. Supervisor LaPisto-Kirtley praised the microCAT program but noted funding uncertainty. Supervisor McKeel emphasized the need for better transit connectivity to the airport and synchronizing traffic signals with the city. - Specific Action Items: Board members provided detailed feedback on individual objectives. Supervisor Gallaway opposed using county funds to supply bike parking to businesses (2.5). Supervisor Mallek criticized micromobility (scooters) as a safety hazard and litter problem. Supervisor LaPisto-Kirtley wanted to avoid tying the county to a steady funding stream for bike/ped projects (2.3), preferring annual budget appropriations. Supervisor McKeel noted the need to include UVA in corridor planning and to address equity in rural areas. - Wildlife Crossings and Debris: Supervisor LaPisto-Kirtley and Supervisor Mallek noted the importance of wildlife crossings and debris removal from storms. Supervisor LaPisto-Kirtley suggested working with the Virginia Transportation Research Council. - Implementation and Next Steps: The board agreed that the next step is implementation, with a multimodal transportation plan to provide details. Staff will bring the implementation discussion to the board on July 16, 2025. Key Outcomes - No formal votes were taken; the work session was for discussion and feedback. - Staff to consider board comments and revise the transportation chapter accordingly. - The board directed staff to explore a program for active recreation on rural roads with careful guardrails. - The multimodal transportation plan concept was generally supported, with attention to avoiding duplication with regional partners. - Next meeting on the topic: July 16, 2025 at 1:00 PM to discuss implementation.

The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors held a regular meeting on Wednesday, May 21, 2025, starting at 1:00 PM in Lane Auditorium. The meeting began with the Pledge of Allegiance, a moment of silence, and adoption of the final agenda (amended to include authorizing the chair to sign letters of support for a Congressional Directed Spending Program dam repair application). Key topics included a proclamation for Older Americans Month, a presentation on the Cost of Community Services Study, a work session on the Economic Development Strategic Plan, and a presentation on the proposed Affordable Housing Trust Fund. Board members made announcements regarding election deadlines, public safety, and community events. Public comments were heard on several topics, including a biophilic cities initiative, affordable housing, and the Scottsville volunteer fire department. The board also held public hearings on the VDOT/Albemarle County FY 26-31 Secondary Six-Year Plan and a special use permit for outdoor storage at 400 Rio Road West. The meeting included two closed sessions for personnel and real estate matters and adjourned at approximately 8:30 PM to May 28, 2025. Proclamation - Proclamation Recognizing May as Older Americans Month (Item 6.1): The board unanimously adopted a proclamation declaring May 2025 as Older Americans Month, urging residents to "flip the script on aging" and celebrate older adults' contributions. The proclamation was presented by Vice Chair Diantha H. McKeel. Christina Evans (Interim CEO of Jefferson Area Board for Aging) was recognized. Consent Calendar - Items Approved (Items 8.1–8.5): The board approved by recorded vote the minutes from several dates in 2023–2024, authorized public hearings for compensation increases for the Board of Supervisors and other appointed boards, approved the Sugar Hollow Reservoir Trailhead Project Administration Agreement, and approved the Flow Hyundai Screening of Vehicles Awaiting Repair special use permit. - Items Received for Information (Items 8.6–8.8): The FY 25 Third Quarter Financial Report, Facilities & Environmental Services Quarterly Report (Spring 2025), and VDOT Monthly Report (May 2025) were received as information. Public Comments & Testimony (First Session: Matters Previously Considered or Currently Pending) - Mona El Khafif (Samuel Miller District): Requested the board consider a resolution for Albemarle County to join the Biophilic Cities Network, highlighting ongoing efforts with UVA and the City of Charlottesville. She emphasized the initiative would strengthen regional identity, resilience, and biodiversity without adding constraints. - Kim Biassioli (Piedmont Environmental Council): Spoke in support of the Cost of Community Services Study, noting that residential land uses generate a deficit while commercial/industrial and agriculture/open space generate surpluses. She urged smart growth within development areas to protect the rural area. - James Walker (Scottsville Community Chamber of Commerce): Thanked the board for visiting Scottsville but requested future meetings include public comment opportunities. He raised concerns about a perceived lack of collaboration regarding the placement of a county fire engine near the Scottsville volunteer fire station, urging better communication. - Keisha Washington (Habitat for Humanity of Greater Charlottesville): Recommended changes to the Affordable Housing Trust Fund guidelines, specifically asking for more flexible affordability terms (opposing 90-year affordability preference that restricts to land trusts) and a 40-year right of first refusal for builders instead of a 40-year low-income occupancy requirement. - Richard Trimble (Samuel Miller District, Habitat volunteer): Echoed concerns about the draft guidelines, stating they unfairly favor land trust models and that Habitat’s model with 40-year affordability and right of first refusal should be eligible. He also asked for flexibility on unit distribution and compliance periods. - Neil Williamson (Free Enterprise Forum): Criticized the draft Affordable Housing Investment Fund for reserving 40% of grant funding for nonprofits and offering 0% loans to nonprofits while charging for-profits 2%, arguing this creates an uneven playing field and discourages mixed-income development. - Christine Robertson (Habitat for Humanity of Greater Charlottesville): Opposed the proposed maximum sale price for affordable homes set at 65% of HUD home limit (approx. $247,000), noting that only 4% of listings in Albemarle County meet that price, which could concentrate affordable units in low-value areas. She suggested per-unit subsidy limits instead. - Christine Putnam (Scottsville District, Natural Heritage Committee): Supported joining the Biophilic Cities Network, highlighting how it could promote health, resilience, economic opportunities (tourism), and cross-jurisdictional collaboration with Charlottesville and UVA. - JD Brown (Program Director, Biophilic Cities, UVA): Offered to serve as a contact for staff, explaining that the network is not a certification but a resource for sharing best practices; applications require documenting natural assets. Noted that 50% of member cities are international and that the city of Charlottesville is already preparing an application. - Peggy Gilgas (Jack Jouett District, Solid Waste Alternatives Advisory Committee): Thanked the board for supporting climate action funding and recommended the county support extended producer responsibility policies and a beverage container deposit system to reduce waste. She also urged implementation of permitting and reporting guidelines for waste haulers to measure waste generation. Presentation: Cost of Community Services Study (Item 9) - Presenters: Ann Wall (Deputy County Executive) and Terance Rephann, Ph.D. (Regional Economist, Weldon Cooper Center). - Purpose: Provide background for the comprehensive plan update, comparing revenues vs. expenditures for three land use categories (residential, commercial/industrial, agriculture/open space). - Key Findings (FY22): Residential land uses generated a deficit of $82 million (ratio 1.32, meaning for every $1 in tax revenue, $1.32 in services is required). Commercial/industrial generated a surplus (ratio 0.32, i.e., $0.32 in services per $1 revenue). Agriculture/open space generated a surplus (ratio 0.537). The ratios balance when adjusted for budget surplus/deficit. - Limitations: The study is static, not marginal; averages may differ from new development costs. K-12 education is the largest residential cost driver (50% of county budget). Public safety data allocation may inflate rural costs due to geocoding issues; a sensitivity analysis showed adjusting to other Virginia study norms brings agriculture ratio to 0.359. - Discussion: Supervisor LaPisto-Kirtley summarized that residential costs more to serve; commercial provides best "bang for buck." Supervisor Pruitt noted that compared to peers, the county spends more on rural public safety per dollar of revenue. County Executive Richardson emphasized the need to diversify the tax base (commercial is only 11.3% of tax base vs. 72% residential) and highlighted that the county's commitment to high per-pupil school funding drives the residential ratio. Supervisor Mallek noted that population growth (4% per year) makes rebalancing difficult. Work Session: Economic Development Strategic Plan (Item 10) - Presenter: Emily Kilroy (Director, Economic Development) and Stephen Pedigo (Resonance Consulting). - Draft Vision: "Albemarle County: rooted in innovation, open for investment – a destination for entrepreneurs, makers, growers, and thinkers, leading Virginia's next innovation economy." - Five Goals: 1. Lead Virginia's intelligence and national security innovation economy (focus on Rivanna Futures). 2. Grow into the Mid-Atlantic's premier destination for biotechnology/life sciences (leveraging existing VC, scaling lab space). 3. Transfer agricultural legacy into a modern agribusiness economy (modernize land use, infrastructure, broadband, co-packing). 4. Make the county a place where talented entrepreneurs (ages 25–44) stay, scale, and succeed (talent retention, child care, housing). 5. Position the county as Virginia's most investment-ready (modernize permitting, maintain site pipeline, marketing). - Discussion: Supervisors supported the framework but raised points about community engagement, need for clearer return on investment, balancing tourism with other sectors, ensuring workforce development alignment, and addressing child care affordability as a barrier. Supervisor Pruitt emphasized that the plan must ensure benefits flow to local residents and not just external capital. Supervisor Mallek cautioned that scaling agriculture must be appropriate to the community (e.g., not large-scale CAFOs but supporting micro-scale businesses like Darby's Turkeys). Chair Andrews noted the plan lacks explicit focus on tax base diversification, though staff said it is referenced in the full document. Presentation: Affordable Housing Trust Fund (Item 11) - Presenters: Stacy Pethia (Assistant Director of Housing), Kaki Dimock (Chief Human Services Officer), and Andy Bowman (Assistant CFO). - Proposed Structure: The fund would transition into a trust fund with dedicated sources (real property tax revenue, developer contributions, loan repayments, general fund transfers). Funding priorities include households at 80% AMI (homeownership) and 60% AMI (rental), with extra consideration for permanent affordability (90-year terms), shovel-ready projects, and projects that leverage other funds. Target populations (seniors, families with children under 5, persons experiencing homelessness) to be set annually by staff and board. - Distribution of Funds: 40% for nonprofit grants, 40% for loans, 20% for emerging housing needs (e.g., acquiring at-risk properties, disaster relocation). - Eligible Activities: Pre-development costs, land acquisition, construction loan interest buy-downs, water/sewer connection fees, new construction/rehabilitation, homeownership projects. Exclusions: property tax penalties, community meeting costs, administrative staff. - Oversight: Proposed Affordable Housing Review Committee (7 voting members: real estate professional, lender with construction loan experience, builder (nonprofit or for-profit), nonprofit housing organization, two county residents, one county representative). Committee would review applications, score them (75% threshold), and make recommendations to the board. - Discussion: Supervisor LaPisto-Kirtley questioned the 90-year affordability preference and the committee composition; she preferred two nonprofit representatives over two county residents. Supervisor Pruitt supported the staff recommendation on affordability terms, argued that race-neutral tools cannot solve race-coded problems, and expressed concern about ensuring oversight is not captured by industry. Supervisor Mallek wanted to prioritize bricks-and-mortar projects over soft services and expressed concerns about the distribution of affordable units requirement. Supervisors debated the 40-year occupancy requirement vs. right of first refusal, with staff noting the county lacks capacity for right of first refusal. The session concluded with staff seeking board direction on the proposed structure and committee composition; the board did not vote but provided feedback. County Executive Report (Item 14) - Presenter: Jeffrey B. Richardson - Highlights: Biscuit Run Park surpassed 50,000 visitors; mountain bike area construction underway with volunteer support. Greg Davis Memorial Track Meet held for 300 middle school athletes. Bluebird Project foster care/adoption awareness. Three county employees received Batten School Peacekeeper of the Year awards. Eight new 911 dispatchers began training. Cross-departmental incident management team training and active threat exercise were completed. Safe worship event with 80 attendees from faith communities. Site visit for Virginia Business Ready Sites Program grant application for Rivanna Futures (decision expected June). Public Comments & Testimony (Second Session: Matters Previously Considered or Currently Pending) - Owen Saili (County resident, Community Lab School): Urged action on invasive species (chestnut blight, kudzu, red imported fire ants), suggesting creation of native plant parks and funding for eradication programs. - Alicia Lenahan (Scottsville District): Expressed concern about police cooperation with ICE, specifically regarding a joint training exercise at Albemarle High School and the purchase of data acquisition systems (Peregrine and I2 Analyst Notebook) that could enable pervasive surveillance. She called for transparency and community control. - Karen Mann (Fluvanna resident, pastor of Sojourners UCC): Criticized Albemarle County Police for conducting a training exercise with DHS near a school and newcomer center, calling it intimidating for vulnerable families. She asked the board to provide oversight and resist ICE cooperation. Public Hearing: VDOT/Albemarle County FY 26-31 Secondary Six-Year Plan (Item 16) - Presenter: Alberic Karina-Plun (Planner I - Transportation) - Proposal: Adoption of the draft plan, updated rural rustic paving process (including a resident toolkit), and approval of the priority list of roads for paving and retained unpaved roads. - Details for Rural Rustic Paving: Roads that receive two-thirds approval from eligible property owners (owners of occupied parcels receiving primary access from the unpaved road) proceed. Roads not meeting threshold are placed on a retained unpaved road list for 6 years. This year, Sutherland Road (partial) is recommended for continuation; Bleak House Road and P Ridge Road did not receive support and staff recommended adding them to the retained list. - Public Speakers: - George Stevens (Samuel Miller, Starlight Road): Supported paving of Starlight Road, citing dust and a hazardous transition from paved to unpaved. - Derek Luck (Hammond's Gap Road): Requested addition to the six-year plan for the unpaved portion, citing dust and safety issues; presented a petition. - Gary Grant (Rio District, Bleak House Road): Opposed paving, arguing only 16 of 33 eligible voters have driveways touching the gravel segment; 14 opposed (42%) vs. 9 in favor (27%), far short of two-thirds; urged board to protect the road from paving for at least six years. - Scott Gentry (Rivanna District, Hammond's Gap Road): Supported paving the remaining two-thirds, noting that since partial paving, maintenance of the unpaved portion has declined. - Board Discussion: Clarified that one vote per owner (even if owner owns multiple parcels) and that owners do not need to be residents. Supervisor Mallek expressed concern that non-resident owners could outvote residents. Other supervisors supported the policy as written. The board approved all three motions (adoption of the plan, updated rural rustic process, and priority list including retaining Bleak House and P Ridge Roads) unanimously. Public Hearing: Special Use Permit – 400 Rio Road West Outdoor Storage (Item 17) - Presenter: Khristopher Taggart (Senior Planner I) - Proposal: Special use permit for outdoor storage, display, and sales of plumbing materials (wholesale waterworks) visible from the Entrance Corridor Overlay District. Applicant: BD Holdings, tenant: Ferguson Enterprises. - Staff Recommendation: Approval with conditions from the Architectural Review Board, including landscaping, berm, and black picket fence to screen materials from view. - Applicant’s Representative: Valerie Long (Williams Mullin) noted the property was previously owned by the phone company and generated no tax revenue; the new use will contribute to the tax base. The site would be an improvement over existing conditions. - Board Action: No questions from supervisors; the motion to approve with conditions passed unanimously. Key Outcomes - Proclamation Recognized: Older Americans Month proclaimed for May 2025. - Consent Agenda Approved: All consent items passed unanimously. - Cost of Community Services Study: Received as information; board discussed implications for tax base diversification. - Economic Development Strategic Plan: Board provided feedback on draft; next step is joint meeting with EDA in August for potential adoption. - Affordable Housing Trust Fund: Board did not vote but gave direction; staff will refine proposed structure and bring back for further consideration. - Secondary Six-Year Plan: Adopted unanimously with all three motions (attachments F, C, and E). Bleak House and P Ridge Roads added to retained unpaved roads list. - Special Use Permit (400 Rio Road West): Approved unanimously with ARB conditions. - Closed Sessions: Board convened closed meetings to discuss annual performance of the County Attorney and disposition of publicly held real property; sessions were certified. - Other: Chair authorized to sign letters of support for Congressional Directed Spending Program dam repair application. Next Meeting - The board adjourned to May 28, 2025, at 2:00 PM, Room 241.

On May 14, 2025, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors held a joint work session with the Scottsville Town Council at Victory Hall in Scottsville, Virginia. The meeting focused on updates to the county's comprehensive plan, economic development strategic plan, and infrastructure projects including water/sewer, fire rescue, and the Scottsville levee. Key discussions centered on growth management, service disparities between urban and rural areas, and the town's need for increased county support for levee maintenance and capital improvements. Discussion Items - AC44 Comprehensive Plan Update (Tonya Swartzendruber, Planning Manager): The county is in Phase 3 of a four-phase effort to update the comprehensive plan. Scottsville is identified as an urban development area, which enables the town to apply independently for state funding (e.g., VDOT Smart Scale). Five plan actions specifically mention Scottsville, including land use, tourism leveraging, and library services. Adoption is anticipated at the board's October 15, 2025 work session. Supervisor Jim Andrews noted the challenge of balancing rural preservation (95% of county land) with growth, and encouraged public engagement on rural area policies. - Economic Development Strategic Plan (Emily Kilroy, Director of Economic Development): The county is updating its strategic plan with a focus on three target sectors: intelligence/national security, biotech/life sciences, and agribusiness/processing. A cluster analysis identified these based on data and recent investments (e.g., Manning Institute at UVA). Opportunities for Scottsville include leveraging its strong sense of place, river recreation tourism, and a 61-acre light industrial site (the former tire plant). Kilroy emphasized that the county needs the town to take the lead on specific requests for support. - Infrastructure Updates: - Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority (David Tungate): The Scottsville water and wastewater treatment plants operate at about 25% capacity. Planned capital investments total $13.2 million over FY25–34, including a $1.15 million wastewater upgrade and a $2 million water plant upgrade. A new Southern Albemarle Convenience Center for solid waste is open six days a week. Concerns about watershed runoff in Totier Creek were acknowledged; the water treatment plant includes UV and granular activated carbon treatment. - Albemarle County Service Authority (Quin Lunsford and Jeremy Lynn): A $7.7 million water main replacement project is underway, covering about 290 customers (less than 2% of ACSA customers). The project will replace aging 1960s cast-iron pipes, double volume with a 12-inch main, and upgrade meters. Construction is expected to begin in late summer/fall 2026 and last 27 months. Traffic impacts and temporary water service will be managed. Easement acquisition is ongoing; completion expected by end of 2025. - Albemarle County Fire Rescue (Chief Dan Eggleston): Southern Albemarle has limited fire rescue resources compared to other rural areas, with longer backup response times (e.g., Station 11 is over 22 minutes away). The county has hired 97 new personnel over five years to address rising call volume (up 20%) and declining volunteer numbers. Starting June 2025, Station 17 will have a 24/7 crew of three (including a paramedic), providing advanced life support and cross-staffing a second ambulance. This initiative aims to close the service gap without replacing volunteers. Chief Eggleston noted a retention rate of around 8% and pledged collaboration with volunteer departments. - Scottsville Levee (Javier Raudales, Town Administrator; Tim Carr, Levee Superintendent; Chief Timmy Gurdsley, Scottsville Fire): The levee, built in 1985–87, is now nearly 40 years old. The town requested increased county financial assistance for capital maintenance. Currently, the county contributes about $22,000 per year (indexed), but the town's capital reserve fund has only $10,000. A concrete sealing project is estimated at $51,000 (excluding discharge structure). Chief Gurdsley detailed recent operations: on May 14, the levee pumped 5 million gallons of water with 15.5 hours of volunteer staffing; during a February 16 flood, 47.4 million gallons were pumped over 66.5 hours (equivalent to 16 FTEs at $1.6 million value). The town emphasized that the levee is do-or-die for the community and that the current MOU formula does not adequately account for capital needs. Public Comments & Testimony - Several residents and officials expressed concerns about service equity. Councilmember Mike Pruitt noted that if Scottsville grows its population, the town will need additional county-funded services (e.g., police) since property tax revenue goes to the county. Supervisor Diantha McKeel acknowledged the challenge and suggested the town consider implementing its own real property tax, but also noted that the county is directing new hires to the south side (e.g., half of new police officers and a large share of new firefighter positions are going to southern Albemarle). - A resident highlighted that the Scottsville community (postal code 24590) extends beyond the town limits and that the food line serves a wide area, sharing the same struggles with affordability and taxes. - A councilmember requested information on future road paving for West Village streets (no sidewalks, potholes); supervisors suggested contacting VDOT about their paving schedule. Key Outcomes - No formal votes were taken; the meeting was a work session for information sharing and discussion. - Supervisor Jim Andrews expressed support for revisiting the levee funding formula to better address capital needs, calling it a "reasonable" ask that could be impactful without a major budget impact. He stated he would discuss with the board and county staff. - The county executive, Jeffrey Richardson, committed to following up with the town administrator on outstanding issues from the meeting. - The AC44 adoption is scheduled for October 15, 2025; community check-in events are set for May 22 (in-person) and June (virtual lunch and learn). - The economic development strategic plan will go to the board for discussion next week, with a joint EDA/board meeting for adoption in August. - The water main replacement project is proceeding with easement acquisition; the town council will continue to coordinate with ACSA on minimizing disruptions.

The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors met on May 7, 2025, at 1:00 PM in Lane Auditorium. The meeting included proclamations, adoption of the fiscal year 2026 budget with a tax rate increase, approval of a regional safety action plan, a work session on the AC44 Housing Chapter, and public hearings on a polling place change, a special event permit, and a steep slopes rezoning. Public comment periods addressed ICE enforcement actions at the courthouse and other community concerns. Consent Calendar - Unanimously approved minutes from multiple dates in 2023, FY26 holiday schedule, website privacy policy update, participation in VDOT EDAP for Boulders Road Extension, easement on county-owned parcel, public hearing notice for acquisition on Dominion Drive, Yancey Elementary/Esmont High School historical marker, road acceptance in Old Trail Creekside, and resolutions of intent for Data Centers Phase 2 zoning text amendment and rezoning. Public Comments & Testimony - Gary Grant (Rio District) questioned a supervisor's consistency on voting decisions and challenged the county executive's claim of resident demand for services, asking for tallies of public input. - Karen Mann (Fluvanna resident, pastor) expressed deep concern over ICE agents entering the Albemarle County Courthouse on April 23, 2025, and arresting two men. She asked whether the county has a cooperation agreement with ICE, what role the county played, and what actions will be taken to prevent future incidents. - Diane Brown (Rivanna District) proposed creating a world-class museum highlighting regional African American history and submitted a letter from descendants of Dr. George Gilmer supporting the idea. - Stephen Herrick (Scottsville District) addressed ICE conduct, suggesting the county decline to prosecute those who nonviolently challenge ICE officers lacking proper authorization and decline federal requests for county cooperation. - Alicia Lenahan (Scottsville District) condemned the ICE courthouse action on April 22 as lawless and dangerous, citing nationwide ICE mistakes, and urged the board to provide heroic leadership. - James King (applicant) and Tim Tolson (Crozet Community Association) spoke in support of the Crozet Independence Day Celebration, outlining safety measures. - Kelsey Schlein (applicant representative) presented the Flow steep slopes rezoning, emphasizing economic development and improved stormwater management. Discussion Items - Proclamations: Recognized May 10-16, 2025 as National Police Week and May 4-10, 2025 as Public Service Recognition Week. Several supervisors praised police and county staff. - FY26 Budget Adoption: County Executive Jeff Richardson presented the $638 million all-funds budget ($474.4 million general fund). Key features: 4-cent real property tax increase (3.2¢ for public safety, including 57 FEMA-funded firefighter positions and 6 new police officers; 0.4¢ for schools, totaling $14.3 million new operating funding; 0.4¢ for affordable housing, $1.2 million ongoing). Personal property tax restored to $4.28. Climate action pool funding at $2.25 million. Board unanimously adopted six related resolutions. - Move Safely Blue Ridge Safety Action Plan: Gorian Gorgievski (TJPDC) presented the regional plan to reduce roadway fatalities by 50% by 2045. From 2018-2022, 875 people were killed or seriously injured; 72% of crashes occurred on 7% of roads. Plan identifies spot improvements, systemic improvements, and policy programs. Board unanimously adopted the resolution. - AC44 Draft Housing Chapter: Principal Planner Victoria Kanellopoulos and Housing Director Stacy Pethia presented. Discussion focused on where to encourage higher density housing (activity centers, transit, employment districts) and criteria for affordable housing proposals outside the development area. Supervisors expressed varied views on inclusionary zoning, permit streamlining, and the need for specific unit goals, tenant protections, and senior housing. No vote was taken; staff will incorporate feedback. - Closed Meeting: Board met in closed session under §2.2-3711(A)(1) and (3) to discuss board appointments and real property disposition. After certifying the closed meeting, they appointed Benjamin Lynch (5th & Avon Community Advisory Committee), Elizabeth Boyd (Jefferson Area Board for Aging Advisory Council), and Betsy Solsby (Solid Waste Alternatives Advisory Committee). - Branchlands Polling Place Change: Unanimously approved moving the polling place from Hillsdale Conference Center to Harvest Church of God (1025 Rio Road East), about 1.8 miles away. - Crozet Independence Day Celebration (SP202400001): Unanimously approved a special use permit for an annual July 4th event at King Family Vineyard, ending by 10:30 PM. Conditions include annual zoning clearance, coordination with public safety, and traffic management. - Flow Steep Slopes Amendment (ZMA202400004): Unanimously approved rezoning 15,704 square feet of preserved steep slopes to managed slopes on the Flow Automotive properties at 1357 and 1381 Richmond Road. The proffer replaces a previous 2.47-acre preservation easement with on-site stormwater treatment providing twice the phosphorus reduction. Applicant noted the change will allow additional parking and includes stabilization of an eroded gully. Key Outcomes - Adopted FY26 budget, tax rates, pay scales, appropriations, borrowing resolution, and CIP (all unanimous 6-0). - Adopted Move Safely Blue Ridge Safety Action Plan (unanimous). - Approved Branchlands polling place change (unanimous). - Approved Crozet Independence Day Celebration special use permit (unanimous). - Approved Flow Steep Slopes Amendment (unanimous). - Appointed three members to boards/commissions. - Board accepted the AC44 Housing Chapter presentation and will continue discussion at future meetings. - Meeting adjourned to May 14, 2025, 7:00 PM at Victory Hall, Scottsville, for a joint meeting with the Scottsville Town Council.

On April 30, 2025, at 6:00 PM in Lane Auditorium, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors held a public hearing to receive comments on the proposed Calendar Year 2025 real property and personal property tax rates. The board also adopted a proclamation, discussed community concerns, and adjourned to the next meeting on May 7, 2025, for formal action. Public Hearing: Calendar Year 2025 Real Property Tax Rates - Gary Grant (Rio District) opposed the proposed 4-cent increase (to $0.894 per $100) on top of an average 5.1% assessment increase, noting his own assessment rose 15%. He suggested cutting the proposed 3.5% employee raise to 2.5%, reducing the general fund increase by 0.8%, or eliminating a “right to housing” policy to lower the tax rate. - Rob Myers (online) expressed concern about the combined impact of the real property tax increase, an 8% personal property tax increase, tariffs (estimated to cost households $3,800 this year), and rising consumer debt. He noted that 25% of buy-now-pay-later users are using such loans for groceries, indicating financial strain. Public Hearing: Calendar Year 2025 Personal Property Tax Rates - No additional speakers signed up. The hearing was opened and closed with no public comments. Discussion Items - Supervisor McKeel requested a history of the personal property tax rate. Andy Bowman (Assistant Chief Financial Officer) explained that the rate was $4.28 per $100 from the 1990s until 2021, then dropped to $3.42 during the pandemic due to vehicle value surges, and has been phased back to $4.28, reflecting pre-pandemic levels. - Supervisor Mallek acknowledged the pain for residents but warned against cutting services that could lead to long-term deficits. - Supervisor LaPisto-Kirtley noted that the community demands high-quality services (fire, police, schools, parks) and that the tax rate reflects those expectations. - Supervisor Galloway cautioned that tariffs on new cars could affect the used car market and personal property values, similar to the pandemic spike. - Supervisor Pruitt and Chair Andrews emphasized that the budget drives the tax rate and that the board has made policy choices reflected in the proposed rates. Key Outcomes - No action taken on tax rates; the board will formally adopt the budget and tax rates on May 7, 2025, at 1:00 PM in Lane Auditorium. - Adopted a proclamation recognizing “Community Salutes” for new military entrants, to be read by Supervisor Pruitt at a ceremony on May 3, 2025 (motion by Pruitt, second by LaPisto-Kirtley, unanimous). - Community cautions were issued: fire danger due to dry conditions (cigarette disposal) and the presence of fire ants in northern Albemarle (report to VDACS). - The meeting adjourned to May 7, 2025, at 1:00 PM.

On April 23, 2025, at 6:00 PM in Lane Auditorium, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors held a public hearing to receive comments on the proposed Fiscal Year 2026 Operating and Capital Budget. The budget, totaling over $600 million (general fund $480.6 million), includes a 4-cent real property tax rate increase to 89.4 cents per $100 of assessed value, a personal property tax rate increase to $4.28 per $100, and no changes to food and beverage or transit occupancy taxes. The proposed budget funds public safety (six new police officers, fire rescue staffing), schools (54% of new revenues plus $1.2 million supplemental), affordable housing ($1.2 million ongoing plus $4 million one-time), community services, climate action, and economic development. The board will adopt the budget on May 7, 2025, following a separate public hearing on property tax rates on April 30. Public Comments & Testimony - Carolyn Crutchfield (White Hall District) spoke about poor management at Crozet Meadows Apartments, requesting better oversight of low-income housing communities and more choices for residents. - Rev. Susan Carlson (White Hall District, co-president of Impact) expressed support for affordable housing, noting the need for $10 million annually and thanking the board for additional funds but stating the proposed amount is insufficient. - Denise Zito (White Hall District, member of Impact) supported affordable housing funding, citing the loss of Cavalier Crossing to luxury apartments and urging the county to purchase properties to preserve affordability. - Reed Krobach (10th grader, Community Lab School) asked for $1 million annual climate action implementation fund, stating the county's 45% emission reduction goal by 2030 is not funded and noting the 2008 baseline. - Veronica Vitko (Rivanna District, junior at Albemarle High School) supported $1 million climate action fund, noting the current $200,000 remaining is insufficient and that other Virginia cities invest more. - Catherine Riley (Rivanna District, junior at Albemarle High School) supported $1 million climate action fund, citing the county's 2020 Climate Action Plan goals and the need for local funding due to federal cuts. - Jane Colony Mills (White Hall District, executive director of Loaves and Fishes) thanked the county for proposed funding, noting a 92% increase in clients since 2022 and the need for cold storage expansion. - Savie O'Flynn (climate justice policy manager, Community Climate Collaborative) stated the budget does not include new climate funding, only $200,000 left from FY22, and urged filling a vacant climate program position. - Lila Castleman (resident) supported $1 million climate action fund, arguing the county's initial climate leadership has not been backed by sufficient funding. - Lexi Ryan (Rio District) supported $1 million climate action fund, emphasizing the need for proactive investment in resilience and sustainability. - Mel O'Bear (resident) requested a community-led housing task force, support for lifting the state ban on rent control, and stronger tenant protections, and launched a petition on change.org. - Todd Cohn (Rio District, Indivisible Charlottesville environmental group) supported full funding of the climate action plan, noting the federal government is unlikely to act. - Michael Monaco (White Hall District) supported affordable housing funding, stating the housing market inflexibility exacerbates greenhouse gas emissions from commuting. - Susan Cruz (executive director, Community Climate Collaborative) urged the board to reinvest in climate action, stating the county is not on track to meet its goals and that claimed climate initiatives are mislabeled. - Indigo Mathon (Rio District, junior at Albemarle High School) supported $1 million climate action fund, emphasizing the need to future-proof the economy. - Martha Donnelly (resident) asked for metrics on progress toward the 2030 emission reduction goal and supported both climate action and biophilic region initiatives. Discussion Items - Board Questions: Supervisor Pruitt asked about unassigned fund balances (reserves). Staff clarified the 10% unassigned balance ($50 million), a 2% operating reserve ($10-11 million), an advancing strategic priorities reserve (remaining $700,000 after April 7 allocations), and a reserve for contingencies ($200,000 ongoing, $600,000 one-time). Supervisor Mallek confirmed no operational funding for new schools opening in FY27. - Climate Action Funding: Supervisor Pruitt proposed reallocating $300,000 from the advancing strategic priorities reserve to the Climate Action Fund, citing the loss of a $460,000 EPA grant for the Resilient Together plan. Several supervisors expressed support conditioned on staff providing a plan to achieve measurable greenhouse gas reductions. Supervisor Mallek emphasized weatherization and energy efficiency; Supervisor LaPisto-Kirtley wanted deliverables; Supervisor Galloway wanted the funding to come back to the board for specific use. Supervisor Andrews supported the motion as a way to start making progress. County Executive Richardson noted staff could return with a plan at the next budget meetings. - ICE Incident: Supervisor Pruitt raised the April 22 seizure of two Albemarle County residents by ICE at the General District Court, noting the county's non-collaboration policy and the sheriff's statement. He condemned the policy as harmful to community safety. Other supervisors concurred, emphasizing the need for federal-level action and the importance of the police chief's statement. Key Outcomes - Motion on Climate Action Funding: Supervisor Pruitt moved to allocate $300,000 from the advancing strategic priorities reserve to the Climate Action Fund, seconded by Supervisor LaPisto-Kirtley. The motion passed unanimously (7-0). Staff will return with a plan for how the funds will be used to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. - Next Steps: The board will hold a public hearing on property tax rates on April 30, 2025, and adopt the final budget on May 7, 2025. The county executive will report on the climate action funding plan at a future meeting. The board also noted the upcoming Spear report in August with performance metrics tied to the strategic plan.

The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors held a combined business meeting and work session on April 17, 2025, for the AC 44 comprehensive plan update. The board approved two action items (a homestay special exception and a private central sewer system) and conducted a detailed work session on the draft "Thriving Economy" and "Community Facilities & Infrastructure" chapters. Public comment focused on budget transparency, tax rates, and development boundaries. Note: The meeting transcript indicates the meeting was called to order on April 16, 2025, while the provided timestamp states April 17, 2025 – a discrepancy exists. Consent Calendar - Adoption of Final Agenda: Motion by Supervisor Malik, second by Supervisor McKeel, approved unanimously (6-0). - Consent Agenda (Item 8): Motion by Supervisor McKeel, second by Supervisor Malik, approved unanimously (6-0). Public Comments & Testimony - Gary Grant (Rio District): Raised a series of critical questions about budget terminology (e.g., using "contributions" instead of "expenses"), the lack of empathy from supervisors and the county executive regarding tax increases, the hold harmless tax rate of 81.3 cents per $100, the absence of slides showing assessment increases during town halls, and the failure to thank taxpayers. He also questioned the Scottsville supervisor's comment about Albemarle being "deeply professional" and requested transparency regarding a supervisor's personal check for snow cones. - Neil Williamson (President, Free Enterprise Forum): Argued that the AC 44 chapter on economic development should be titled "Driving Economy" rather than "Thriving" due to the need for expanded development area boundaries. He cited that 40% of the regional workforce commutes from outside, and that restricting economic activity to less than 5% of the county's land mass is short-sighted. He warned that continued constraints will price out teachers, firefighters, and police officers. He urged the board to consider the impacts of long commutes on absenteeism and retention. Discussion Items - Special Exception 2025-53130 (Sugar Hill Lane Homestay): Senior Planner Leah Brumfield presented a request for a homestay in an accessory structure (garage) built after 2019, thus requiring an exception. The property is a 7.27-acre rural parcel near Whitehall. No negative neighbor feedback was received; one neighbor called the applicants "exemplary hosts." Staff recommended approval. The board unanimously approved. - Old Dominion Village Private Central Sewerage System: Civil Engineer Greg Kristiniac presented a request for a central sewer system serving 111 connections in the Crozet area. The system includes gravity lines, force mains, and two pump stations, discharging to the Albemarle County Service Authority. Discussion centered on financing (developer will take a bank loan, HOA will cover maintenance), long-term maintenance obligations, and environmental risks due to proximity to Beaver Creek Reservoir, a drinking water source for 12,000 people. Supervisor Malik expressed strong concerns about the risk of failure and the need for buyer notification and reserve funds. Staff and applicant (Tim Miller, engineer; Kitura Rowell, developer) clarified that DEQ will regulate the system and that ongoing inspections will occur. The board unanimously approved the resolution. - Work Session on AC 44 Draft Chapters: Development Process Manager David Benish lead the review of two chapters: - Thriving Economy: The chapter focuses on land use, infrastructure, and workforce development. Board members emphasized the need to diversify the tax base (currently 11.3% commercial/industrial vs. 72% residential), to include a specific objective for rural economic development, to add attraction to retention/expansion strategies, to provide captions for photos and update data, and to better integrate workforce training (including partnerships with PVCC). Supervisor Galloway highlighted the need for performance benchmarks in the economic development strategic plan. Supervisor Pruitt noted conflicts between protecting industrial sites and allowing conversion to residential. - Community Facilities & Infrastructure: The chapter covers utilities, schools, public safety, broadband, solid waste, energy, and green infrastructure. Board members called for tightening and reducing duplication, updating outdated information (e.g., school figures), clarifying language on biosolids, ensuring schools in rural areas are not marginalized, and addressing broadband equity (ensuring underserved areas are prioritized before upgrading speed). Supervisor McKeel stressed the importance of coordinating utility work to avoid digging up new pavement. Supervisor Malik noted the need to preserve copper telephone lines during broadband transition. Supervisor Lapisto Kirtley questioned the feasibility of requiring new school locations solely within development areas. Key Outcomes - Action Items: Both Special Exception 2025-53130 (homestay) and the Old Dominion Village private central sewer system were approved unanimously (6-0). - Work Session Direction: Staff were asked to: - Incorporate tax base diversification language into the Thriving Economy chapter. - Add a new objective on rural economic development. - Update data, add photo captions, and correct typos. - Tighten and consolidate actions in the Community Facilities chapter, especially regarding schools and broadband. - Report back with refined chapters for further board review.

The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors met on Wednesday, April 16, 2025, at 1:00 PM in Lane Auditorium. The meeting included announcements, public comments, consent agenda approval, two action items, a work session on two AC44 comprehensive plan draft chapters (Thriving Economy and Community Facilities & Infrastructure), a closed meeting, two public hearings (Berkmar Flats rezoning and The K9 Hotel special use permit/exception), and committee reports. Key outcomes included approvals of all action items and public hearings with an amendment to one. Consent Calendar - Approved minutes from multiple dates in 2023. - Approved Piedmont Liability Trust Tax Agreement. - Approved Board of Supervisors and Economic Development Authority Memorandum of Understanding. - Approved SE-2025-00006 Avon Court Industrial (Stepback Waiver). - Received informational reports: Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority Quarterly Report, Albemarle County Service Authority Quarterly Report, VDOT Monthly Report (April 2025). Public Comments & Testimony - First Public Comment (1:00 PM): Gary Grant (Rio District) criticized the county budget process, questioning the use of euphemisms like "contributions" and "investments," the lack of explicit mention of a tax rate increase, and the absence of empathy for taxpayers. He also asked about transparency regarding assessment increases and a proposed snow cone budget item. - Second Public Comment (from 1:00 PM): Neil Williamson (Free Enterprise Forum) argued for expanding the county's development boundaries, stating that restricting economic and residential activity to less than 5% of land mass is