The Public Meeting Index

The Anchorage Assembly held a work session to discuss amendments and the substitute version of the Missing Middle Housing Opportunity Overlay (MHOP) ordinance (AO 2026-85). The session focused on refining zoning rules to increase housing supply along transit corridors while addressing neighborhood compatibility, seismic safety, and infrastructure capacity. Public Comments & Testimony No public testimony was taken during this work session, but members frequently referenced strong community feedback received during prior hearings. Discussion Items - Level Set (Sponsors Baldwin Dave & Martinez): Explained the ordinance implements the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. A 30+ pound physical copy of the plan was displayed to illustrate the difficulty of singular interpretation. Planning Director Melissa Babb noted the department tries to be consistent with interpretations. - Amendment 1 (Baldwin Day Park): Limits lot coverage to 40% for single-family homes without ADUs to prevent overly large structures ("McMansions"). Excludes properties with ADUs or short-term rentals. - Amendment 2 (Baldwin Day Martinez): Replaced the overlay map with Exhibit A1, aligning it with the 2025 multifamily tax abatement map. Cleaned up boundaries (e.g., eliminating street slicing), added parcels near future transit corridors (36th Ave), and excluded the JBER crash zone. Parcel count changed from 31,947 (TISDO v6) to 32,102 (MHOP boundary). - Amendments 5-8 (Silvers / Handeland): - 5: Requires a shared wall for structures on a lot line. Planning staff considered it duplicative. - 6: Creates graduated 5-foot height transitions by zone. Planning staff noted 5 extra feet rarely enables a full additional floor; 40 feet is standard for 3-story contemporary construction. - 7: Requires drainage plans over 50% total building coverage. Baldwin Dave noted current code allows paving entire lots. CED Director Bob Dole confirmed a wider code update on impermeable surfaces is being explored. - 8: Requires site plan review for larger developments in R2A/R2B. Silvers argued this is a reasonable mitigation for introducing nineplexes into single-family neighborhoods. - Mayor LaFrance's Amendment: Extends the 30-foot height limit and a 10-foot front setback to R1A, R2, R2A, and R2D zones to reduce visual impact and provide snow storage. Bob Dole stated it preserves neighborhood feel. - Substitute Version (S Version) by Ms. Park: - Introduced a tiered overlay (5 categories), seismic zone exclusions, a 10-year sunset with a 3,000-unit production trigger, and a mandatory reversion. - Ms. Park clarified she intended to first work through amendments to the original version. - Baldwin Dave queried complexity, as Planning staff confirmed no existing overlay uses subcategories, increasing administrative burden. - Martinez questioned how excluding seismic zones from the overlay made those areas safer, noting the increased cost of seismic engineering. - Amendments 9-11 (Baldwin Day): Require annual reporting and a 5-year policy evaluation (9), clarify Comprehensive Plan interpretation authority is reserved for the Planning Commission and Assembly (10), and add a technical code abbreviation (11). Key Outcomes - Amendment Withdrawn: Amendment 4 (medium community facilities) was withdrawn by the sponsor for future standalone consideration. - No Votes Taken: This was a work session; no formal votes or decisions were recorded. - Next Steps: The item is tentatively scheduled for the November 4, 2026, Assembly meeting, acknowledging a crowded agenda. Ms. Park confirmed her intent to try reaching a compromise on the original version first. - Record Correction: Long-Range Planning Manager Daniel McKenna Foster corrected a previously stated height increase from 36 feet to 31 feet.

The Government Operations Committee of the Richmond City Council met on October 28, 2026, at 20:45 UTC. All committee members were present and a quorum was confirmed. Items included an HR presentation on performance management and residency requirements, Ordinance 2026-281 on sewer discharge permits, Resolution 2026-R043 on the Dominion Energy/NextEra Energy merger, board vacancy appointments, and scheduling updates. Public Comments & Testimony - No speakers addressed the committee for public comment on non-agenda items. - Andrew Seidel, a District 2 resident and member of Stop Next Era, opposed Resolution 2026-R043 as written. He argued that the merger would create the largest electrical utility on Earth and that no concessions could justify allowing it, and he urged the council to oppose the merger under any circumstances. - Liam Keo, a District 2 resident who said he works in renewable-energy development with Apex, also opposed the resolution as written. He cited NextEra's record in Florida, alleged anti-competitive practices and project sabotage, and said the merger would worsen corporate consolidation and affordability. - No one spoke in support of Resolution 2026-R043. Discussion Items Human Resources Presentation: Performance Management and Residency - HR Director Ms. Martin described performance management as an ongoing process connected to a thriving city hall, accountability, employee growth, and departmental alignment. - The original pilot included five departments, over 290 participating managers, and 405 employees. Journal-entry usage was negligible; 23% of pilot participants had an opportunity to complete ratings. The presentation noted that about 10% of pilot participants fell below expectations and that most met or exceeded expectations. A councilmember asked about preliminary ratings showing over 10% below expectations and zero exceptional ratings; Ms. Martin said the pilot was administered by a prior administration and that current training includes manager education on goals and ratings. - Structural gaps included broad job classifications instead of formal job descriptions, weak reporting hierarchies, and goals not built around identified objectives. The city is pursuing a classification and compensation study and a redesigned process with SMART goals, frequent check-ins, and data cleanup. - Mr. Donald discussed technology deployment lessons, noting the current implementation window of October 20 to November 12, with an internal target near November 10, plus risk-assessment checkpoints and review of journaling and evaluation criteria to reduce subjectivity. - Councilmembers questioned the lack of department-specific job descriptions. Ms. Martin said job classes are baselines and the class/comp study will create more formal descriptions. The RFP is with procurement; once contracted, the study could take 18-24 months and will not be complete in time for the coming budget. She said compensation comparisons should focus on duties rather than titles alone and should be national in scope. - A councilmember raised the water crisis and compared Richmond's utility director job description with Henrico's, asking that identified gaps be highlighted. Ms. Martin said job requirements are set by departmental need but industry standards still apply. - On staffing, councilmembers asked about temporary staff, unfilled FTEs, and position control. Ms. Martin said a position control board exists under the CAO, meets about twice monthly, and reviews budget and position requests; employee goals and position-control decisions are separate. She offered to follow up with administration on temporary-staff and FTE questions. - Residency data: under the ordinance applying to senior executives hired or promoted after September 1, 2025, three waivers were requested, one was granted, and two are pending. - Open audit recommendations: HR has completed its required portions; many are awaiting legal, union, and CAO review during collective bargaining. Ordinance 2026-281 - Sewer Discharge Permits - Lee Croell, on behalf of DPU and Dr. Morris, said the ordinance aligns the City Code with the department responsible for issuing industrial wastewater discharge permits. There would be no changes to permittee requirements or fiscal impacts. About 47 permits are currently issued, including roughly two dozen septage haulers and the rest industrial manufacturers. - No public comment was offered. The committee voted to forward the ordinance to the full council with a recommendation to approve. Resolution 2026-R043 - Dominion Energy/NextEra Energy Merger - Councilmember Gibson introduced the resolution. The council had entered the SEC merger case in September without taking a position. The resolution would oppose approval of the SEC joint petition unless the petitioners agree to specific commitments in a binding stipulation agreement submitted to the SEC. Gibson cited Richmond's RVA Green 2050 plan, rate and water concerns, and the statewide context of data-center growth. She said she strongly opposes the merger as proposed and is working on amendments to strengthen the resolution. - During discussion, Gibson said she hoped for a unanimous, strong position and acknowledged that Dominion had reached out to council members. Another councilmember also opposed the merger but preferred to forward the resolution without recommendation because amendments were not yet public and a closed-session legal overview was scheduled for the following Monday. - Gibson agreed, and the committee voted to forward Resolution 2026-R043 to the full council with no recommendation; amendments remain under development. Board Vacancy Report and Appointments - The Council Management Analyst (transcript names vary between Pamela Nichols and Stephanie Nichols) presented current and projected vacancies through February 2027. - The committee approved recommendations for Katara Henry (Clean City Commission); Sister Cities Commission reappointments of Stafford Umsted, Linda Freeman, Moose Wacabonga, and Roxia Zow; and Robert Jones (Sustainability and Resilience Commission). Audit Committee vacancies were continued to the November meeting. Other vacancies were carried forward, with one continued to January to allow additional applications. Staff Report and Scheduling - Staff will follow up with HR on the topics discussed, including the classification/compensation study timeline. - The next Government Operations Committee meeting was rescheduled to Thursday, November 19, at 1:30 p.m.; the topic will be a Department of Public Utilities presentation on the combined sewer overflow system. The December meeting was rescheduled to Thursday, December 17, at 1:30 p.m. Key Outcomes - Ordinance 2026-281 was forwarded to the full council with a recommendation to approve. - Resolution 2026-R043 was forwarded to the full council with no recommendation; Councilmember Gibson will continue drafting amendments before the upcoming council meeting. - Board vacancy appointments and reappointments were approved as listed; Audit Committee vacancies were continued and other vacancies were carried forward. - The committee's next regular meeting was rescheduled to November 19, 2026, and its December meeting to December 17, 2026.

On October 28, 2026, the Cook County Finance Committee, chaired by Chairman Daly, held a hearing to review the proposed FY2027 Capital Budget. Chief Financial Officer Angela Manning Hardeman presented the budget alongside Chief Jamie Myers (Bureau of Asset Management), Acting Superintendent Tara Orban (Department of Transportation and Highways), and Chief Information Officer Tom Lynch (Bureau of Technology). The combined capital plan includes a $240.1 million Capital Improvement Program (CIP), $180 million for transportation and highways, and capital equipment projects funded largely by debt (57.3%). Commissioners explored the budget's alignment with the county's six policy roadmap pillars. Discussion Items - Capital Budget Overview: CFO Hardeman stated the county received Fitch credit upgrades (A to A+ for GO and sales tax bonds). The debt strategy targets 2% annual growth, capped at $400 million. Commissioner Lauber questioned refinancing opportunities; Hardeman confirmed two refinancings in FY26 saved $12 million, recommending an annual review due to market volatility. Hardeman also confirmed escrowed resources from the road builders case are kept segregated. - Capital Improvement Program and Facilities (BAM): Chief Jamie Myers reported the FY27 CIP request is $240.1 million. The county achieved a 57% carbon emissions reduction (end of 2024), exceeding the 45% target, and is adopting a new goal of 50% reduction by 2034. Key projects include the DOC Enhanced Visitation Center (opening end of FY27), the new Medical Examiner's Office design, Boardroom completion (substantial completion expected the following week), and 18 solar installations by end of 2027. Commissioner Nayer questioned the low energy-specific allocation (2.3%) in the corporate portfolio. Myers explained energy projects compete with life safety and accessibility, with progress tracked by an annual benchmark report. Director of Capital Planning Earl Manning stated ADA work is embedded in most projects and agreed to adjust the budget presentation. Commissioner Nayer also flagged spending jumps between FY27 and FY28 (e.g., Public Safety from $81M to $278M). Manning explained this reflects a shift from design to construction phases. Commissioner Degnan inquired about solar deployment, the warehouse study (draft finalizing), and bird-friendly windows (already part of green standards). Commissioner Marita raised concerns about courthouse security camera quality; Myers committed to a follow-up discussion on upgrades. - Transportation and Highways (DOTH): Acting Superintendent Tara Orban presented the $285.5 million program, including 20 miles of road rehab. The Invest in Cook program awarded $8.3M to 36 projects in the previous cycle, leveraging $3 for every $1 county investment. The FY27 budget includes $8.5M for the 11th round. $68.8M in pass-through grants supports the program. Commissioner Lauber requested a breakdown of the 43 high-need communities receiving awards. Commissioner Degnan asked about the impact of the federal administration on funding; Orban stated the landscape remains stable. Commissioner Reid requested a status update on PACE dial-a-ride funding; Orban committed to following up. - Technology and Capital Equipment (BOT): CIO Tom Lynch presented the capital equipment plan. Key projects include an electronic warrant management system, a new Public Defender case management system, a Grants Management System RFP, ADA digital accessibility compliance (April 2027 deadline), and $2.8 million for a Gen AI platform. Lynch reported the retirement of hundreds of legacy mainframes across elected offices, enabling real-time data sharing. The County Clerk's system is expected to go live by end of calendar year 2026. On the Tyler Technologies system, renewal options are being exercised in November 2026 to maintain stability while the county explores alternatives. Lynch stated the Gen AI platform will be a county-controlled AWS platform to protect data. Commissioner Degnan emphasized the importance of carefully evaluating AI vendors' ethics. Commissioner Vasquez stated the county should set aside budget dollars to build an alternative to Tyler. Commissioners discussed implementing domestic violence task force recommendations on courtroom technology; Lynch noted a complex RFP for courtroom tech enhancements is underway. Key Outcomes - The hearing served as a budget review; no formal vote was taken. - BAM will adjust budget documentation to better capture ADA spending. (Commissioner Nayer) - DOTH will provide the list of 43 high-need communities and follow up on PACE funding. (Commissioners Lauber, Reid) - BAM will discuss upgrading courthouse security camera systems and resume ICE/US Marshal presence notices to commissioners. (Commissioner Marita) - The Boardroom renovation is scheduled for substantial completion within days of the hearing. - The county will explore alternatives to the Tyler Technologies system via an RFP while exercising renewal options for continuity.

The Public Works Committee met at 2:30 PM on Wednesday, October 28, 2026, in Room 411 of One Technology Center, 175 E. 2nd St., Tulsa, OK. Chair Dutton and Co-Chairs Hall-Harper, Decter Wright, and Bush conducted the meeting. The agenda covered three board reappointments, the Arts Commission FY 2026-2027 Vision for the Arts proposal, selection of two councilors for the Vision Arts 8 independent review panel, and discussion of project proposals for 2017 Vision Tulsa economic development surplus funds. No minutes were available for this meeting, and no formal committee votes were taken. Reappointment Presentations - Ellen Duecker (CD-9) presented for reappointment to the Tulsa City/County Library Commission, with a term expiring July 31, 2029; she had attended 7 of 9 meetings. Duecker described 28 years as a school librarian and 18 years as Tulsa Public Schools library director. She expressed strong support for libraries as vital third spaces and community anchors, praised recent library investments, and discussed the need to expand Maxwell Library. - William 'BJ' Frohnapfel (CD-4) presented for reappointment to the Infrastructure Development Advisory Board, with a term expiring September 30, 2028; he had attended 6 of 11 meetings. He said the board works well with city staff, but identified city engineering-services staffing turnover and continuity as a key challenge. Councilors thanked him for his regional perspective and willingness to serve. - Charles Blue (CD-4) presented for reappointment to the Tulsa Public Facilities Authority, with a term expiring July 31, 2029; he had attended 10 of 12 meetings. Blue recounted the board's evolving responsibilities and expressed personal opposition to selling parkland, citing the loss of REI and associated tax revenue after a parkland sale. He suggested the city consider whether incentives or nearby assets such as the bus station could attract investment. Arts Commission Presentation: FY 2026-2027 Vision for the Arts - Sarah Phoenix, chair of the Arts Commission, presented the proposed Vision for the Arts program. Vision Arts 7, which ended June 30, 2026, awarded a total of $150,000 to 18 Tulsa arts organizations: 7 large and 11 small. A calculation discrepancy required roughly 8.5% across-the-board reductions to the awarded amounts. Phoenix estimated about $800,000 in requests went unfunded, though she first said $650,000. - The proposed Vision Arts 8 timeline includes an application opening on November 1, 2026; an open call for independent review panelists on November 15, 2026; an application deadline of February 1, 2027; and award notifications on April 30, 2027. Orientation dates and optional grant-support sessions were also outlined. - Councilors asked about comparable cities. Phoenix cited Columbus, Ohio's roughly $3-4 million annual arts grants and said the commission is researching other cities. A councilor asked to see that data and suggested comparing Albuquerque and Colorado Springs. Independent Review Panel Selection Discussion - Councilors discussed selecting two City Council members to serve on the Vision Arts 8 independent review panel. A councilor identified in the transcript as Councillor Bellis volunteered and suggested standardizing applicant budget templates for more apples-to-apples comparisons. Other councilors discussed the time commitment and past panel experiences. The transcript does not record a formal selection of the two panelists. Vision Tulsa Economic Development Surplus Funds Discussion - Council Administrator Sarah Davis reviewed the history: voters approved Vision Tulsa in 2016, with the ordinance labeled 2017, covering public safety, streets and public transportation, and economic development. The economic development fund overperformed because the use tax was no longer needed for bond debt, producing a $103 million one-time fund balance and approximately $12 million in annual funds. - In June 2026, the council approved placing the $12 million annual use-tax stream into general use and adopted a FY 2026-2027 budget that appropriated $35.4 million of surplus funds, including homelessness funding and the Public Safety Center. The discussion focused on an approximately $18.5 million council-priority bucket and project proposals aligned with Vision's economic development mission. - Resident-support proposals included continuing the Save Our Homes Initiative, an ARPA-funded program that served over 100 people; a multi-year after-school and out-of-school-time pilot, with a roughly $1 million placeholder and a $343,000 Opportunity Project proposal cited; and utility assistance, with an initial $250,000 placeholder that councilors said would cover only about a month of need. - Facility and economic-generator proposals included airport workforce childcare as a potential match for state partners, an endowment for the river dam and lake structure, the Mohawk golf course floodgate estimated at $700,000-$750,000 with $280,000 in lost revenue in one year from flood closures, and a roughly $14 million golf course master plan. - Corridor and commercial-district proposals included the Eastside Business Center, a Brookside reinvestment project described as a $52 million public-private development needing a $2 million city commitment for its capital stack, lighting and pedestrian improvements in the medical corridor/Riverbend arts district near the low-barrier shelter, and a $5.25 million downtown initiatives placeholder. Plaza St. Cecilia was also cited as a time-sensitive project needing about $1.5 million to complete. - Council discussion reflected several positions. Some councilors questioned round placeholder numbers and district equity; one noted that District 9 does not qualify for TIFs and had no projects in the last Vision package. Another councilor objected to district-by-district framing, saying the funds should be catalytic and citywide rather than an 'Oprah exercise.' Other councilors asked for specific project proposals or a bring-back condition before final appropriation so broad buckets would not be approved without council review. - Time-sensitive items identified included Brookside reinvestment, Plaza St. Cecilia, after-school programming, the Eastside Business Center, airport childcare matching funds, and the Mohawk floodgate. Councilors generally agreed that hard-dollar, time-sensitive projects should be prioritized and that more detailed documentation and deadlines should be provided before appropriations. Key Outcomes - No formal votes were taken by the Public Works Committee. The three reappointments were discussed and referred to the full City Council. The agenda lists full council consideration on 11/4/26, but the transcript repeatedly says voting would occur at the 5 p.m. meeting on 10/28/26; that discrepancy was not resolved in the meeting. - The Arts Commission's proposed Vision Arts 8 timeline was presented but not voted on. The commission is awaiting council approval and the selection of two councilors to the independent review panel. - No formal appointment of the two councilors to the Vision Arts 8 independent review panel was recorded in the transcript. - The committee did not appropriate any Vision Tulsa surplus funds. Councilors agreed to continue the discussion, obtain detailed project proposals and deadlines for time-sensitive projects, and consider whether to move funds as a package or through phased appropriation at a future meeting.

The South Platte River Committee of the Denver City Council convened on Wednesday, October 28, 2026, at 1:30 PM to review and vote on a single agenda item: Council Bill 26-1578, a map amendment to rezone approximately 3.4 acres from I-A, UO-2 to I-MX-5 with waivers. The rezoning aims to preserve industrial manufacturing and wholesale uses at the street level while allowing a mix of uses above. The committee heard a presentation from Fran Peñafiel of Community Planning and Development, received input from the applicant, and debated the implications. Following discussion, the committee voted 5-0 to approve the filing and refer the bill to the full City Council. Public Comments & Testimony - The Atmar Park Neighborhood Association submitted a neutral comment letter, indicating they met with the applicant and took no position due to the absence of specific redevelopment plans. No other public comments were received. - The applicant, Todd Snyder, spoke during discussion to clarify ownership and intentions, noting there are no immediate redevelopment plans and the two property owners are separate. Discussion Items - Fran Peñafiel, principal city planner, presented the rezoning request. The proposed I-MX-5 district allows residential, commercial, and industrial uses up to five stories, with waivers requiring that at least 50% of building frontage along primary streets (South Platte River Drive and West Mississippi Avenue) be used for industrial, manufacturing, or wholesale at the street level. The waivers also limit townhouse form and primary street designation to ensure continued industrial presence consistent with the 2026 Southwest Area Plan and Blueprint Denver. - Council Member Alvidrez expressed concerns about the viability of forcing industrial uses in a changing market, potential equity issues of placing affordable housing near industrial ground floors, and the lack of a concrete development plan. She noted the site is currently occupied by industrial uses but feared future constraints. Despite reservations, she indicated willingness to move the item forward. - Council Member Flynn sought detailed clarification of the waivers and their application across separate ownership parcels, praising the thoroughness of the presentation. - Council Member Hinds voiced skepticism based on past rezoning experiences (e.g., Carvana, Great Divide) where stated intentions later changed, emphasizing that the lack of a plan made him uneasy but acknowledging the legal criteria for approval. - Chair Torres highlighted that preserving industrial uses equates to preserving jobs and listed example uses (e.g., food preparation, telecommunications) that can be compatible with nearby housing. She noted the complexity created by not having a development concept and suggested the applicants may have benefited from a paired concept. - The applicant, Todd Snyder, explained that the owners initially sought a straight I-MX-5 rezoning in 2024 but were directed by staff to align with the then-in-progress Southwest Area Plan, resulting in the waiver framework. He expressed curiosity about how industrial and residential uses will coexist but deferred to the owners' decision. Key Outcomes - The committee voted 5-0 (members Alvidrez, Flynn, Hinds, Watson, and Chair Torres in favor; Sandoval and Romero Campbell absent) to approve Council Bill 26-1578 for filing, sending it to the full City Council for a final vote. - The approval is a recommendation; the rezoning will be considered by the full City Council on December 7, 2026, as tentatively scheduled.

The Crestwood Board of Aldermen met at approximately 7:00 p.m. on October 28, 2026, in the Aldermanic Chambers at the Crestwood Government Center, 1 Detjen Drive, Crestwood, Missouri. The regular meeting continued past 9:15 p.m. Seven aldermen were present and formed a quorum; Alderperson Nangle Worum was excused. The agenda included the Q3 financial presentation, the Family Games/Pickleball/Amphitheater concept presentation, a public hearing on the proposed Ridgewood Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District, continued discussion of the sewer lateral fund, and approval of a court-services agreement with Sunset Hills. Consent Calendar - Approved the October 13, 2026 Board of Aldermen regular meeting minutes. - Approved an ordinance authorizing the purchase and installation of furniture for the Cliffs at Whitecliff Park from Circadia and authorizing negotiation and execution of a contract by city officials. - The consent agenda passed by roll-call vote, 7-0; no items were removed. Public Comments & Testimony - During the Ridgewood public hearing, Chaz Weeby (Liggett Drive) opposed the overlay, asking whether other Crestwood neighborhoods face similar limits and calling the proposal a government-appropriated HOA. He said he has long planned a home addition and is concerned about restrictions on property use. - Angela Seven (Yorkshire States Drive), a Planning and Zoning Commission member, expressed concern about insufficient neighborhood buy-in. She cited a first-survey return rate of 34%, a second-survey return rate of 28 responses, about 10%, and said positive support falls to roughly 23–27% when non-responses are included. She recommended that neighborhood property owners organize and demonstrate majority support before the city enact the overlay. - Neil Chase (Liggett Drive), a 19-year Ridgewood homeowner, said his family strongly supports the overlay, citing Ridgewood’s architectural and social character and the need to prevent incompatible redevelopment. - Nancy Woods (Coffee Drive), a 27-year resident, supported the overlay and said she wants to avoid inappropriate large redevelopment in the neighborhood. - Caleb Sexton (Trelaine Avenue) supported preserving Ridgewood’s front-facing mid-century design but cautioned against over-limiting non-street-facing additions. - During general public comment, Ted Yim (Clydesdale) praised the Family Games Center drawings but said he is disappointed that food and beverage service was not included, and he noted the existing amphitheater stage should not simply be removed. Public Hearing – Ridgewood Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District - The city planner presented a proposed text amendment to Chapter 26 establishing a conservation overlay district for Ridgewood. The district would apply design guidelines to new construction and additions above 400 square feet or visible from the street, including low-slope gable roofs, off-center ridge lines, wide roof overhangs, a two-story/25-foot height limit, wall-height limits, finished-floor elevation no more than one foot above grade, restrictions on centering windows and doors under roof ridges, and dimensional requirements for front-projecting chimneys. Existing homes, repairs, and non-conforming features would be grandfathered; staff would administer the rules through regular permitting, with appeals to the Planning and Zoning Commission and review by the Board. - Development included a November 2025 town hall, summer Planning and Zoning public hearings, and a Planning and Zoning recommendation of 6-0-1. The final survey mailed to property owners drew 28 responses, with 85% of respondents in support and two opposed. - Board discussion included support from Alderperson Now, Alderman Zavis, Alderman Seven, Alderman Morrison, and Alderman Hall, who described the guidelines as a relatively light touch and a preservation opportunity. Alderman Maybe opposed the ordinance, calling it a pseudo-HOA, arguing it is a solution in search of a problem, would restrict property rights, may slow property-value growth, and that the neighborhood’s founders did not choose to impose such restrictions. - The Board voted 6-1 to approve the ordinance on first reading, with Alderman Maybe the sole no vote. The second reading was set for the next meeting’s old business. Discussion Items - Q3 Financial Presentation: The city administrator presented the financial report. The 2026 general fund budget projects revenues of $15,145,856, expenditures of $14,955,682, and a positive fund-balance change of $191,174. Q3 revenues were approximately $2.806 million against expenditures of roughly $3.4–$3.5 million, a $673,000 negative variance. Compared with Q3 2025, revenues fell $500,000 and expenditures fell $224,000. September sales tax decreased $206,000 because St. Louis County recalculated distributions; grant income fell $309,000; investment earnings fell $53,000; licensing and permits rose $30,000. The capital improvement fund budget has revenues of $2,382,000, expenditures of $2,799,000, and a budgeted deficit of $416,000. Parks and stormwater funds budgeted revenues of almost $2.6 million against expenditures of $2.7 million, a $151,000 deficit. The sewer lateral fund originally budgeted $148,000 in revenues and $188,000 in expenditures, with $80,000 added later through budget amendments. - Family Games/Pickleball/Amphitheater Presentation: Bond Architects and Navigate Building Solutions presented the refined concept for Whitecliff Park. The design includes a grass-terraced amphitheater for roughly 500–600 people, four pickleball courts with a shade pavilion, a regulation shuffleboard court, bocce/cornhole turf courts, a double-wide bocce court, ADA ramps, an access drive for performers and fire apparatus, restrooms, and a green room. The project evolved after renovating the existing community center would have triggered full code compliance; renovation estimates rose from about $2.6 million to just under $5 million, while the current amphitheater concept was previously estimated at $3.9 million including retaining walls and assumed 10% contingency and 4% escalation. Removing retaining walls is expected to save $200,000–$300,000, and the project team is hopeful of landing near $3.5–$3.7 million. Schematic design is planned to begin November 9, 2026, with a schematic-design estimate before Christmas; construction documents are targeted for May 6, 2027, bidding around June 2027, and construction after the new community center is complete and the old pool and center close. Board members asked about cost reductions, amphitheater accessibility, bench placement, bocce court layout, shade structures, and the proposed storage-room elimination. - Sewer Lateral Fund Discussion: The city administrator distributed a memo continuing prior discussions. The program is funded by a per-property fee on tax bills of about $25–$28 and currently allows city contribution up to $10,000 per repair with a 50% cost-share provision. Staff reviewed cost-containment options, including lower repair thresholds of $2,500, $3,500, $5,000, and $7,500, eliminating the 50% cost share, reimbursing homeowners rather than managing contractor work, and charging administrative fees. Using 2025 data, a $2,500 threshold would have saved about $29,000, roughly 19.5% of annual project costs, and affected 20 projects. Projected FY27 administrative costs are $25,604 if retained. Staff found 17 of 24 local municipalities recover administrative costs and found no regional municipality funding sewer lateral work through a property tax; repair costs did not correlate with home size or value. Board members offered differing views on reimbursement versus city-managed repairs, keeping or lowering the threshold, raising the fee toward the $50 statutory cap, or placing a property tax before voters. No decision was made; the mayor asked staff to bring back a stronger proposal with options and five-year projections for a future meeting. Mayor, Board and City Administrator Reports - Reports highlighted a successful Suncrest Fest, including a well-attended parade, car show, toddler area, and volunteer participation by both Crestwood and Sunset Hills; an upcoming Santa Car Cruise on December 5; ongoing restoration of the Sappington House chimneys; the SR Blue ribbon-cutting; and a Girl Scouts tour of city facilities. - The mayor reported recycling events diverted a combined 60,000 pounds from landfills: 10,000 pounds of paper, 20,000 pounds of paint, and 30,000 pounds of electronics. New Business – Sunset Hills Municipal Division Services Agreement - The Board considered an ordinance approving an agreement with the City of Sunset Hills for the provision of municipal division services, authorizing the mayor and city administrator to execute the agreement. - The ordinance passed unanimously, 7-0, on first reading and again on second reading, giving final approval. Key Outcomes - Approved the consent agenda, including the October 13 minutes and the Circadia furniture contract, 7-0. - Approved the Ridgewood Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District ordinance on first reading, 6-1; the second reading will appear on the next meeting’s old business. - Approved the Sunset Hills municipal division services agreement, 7-0 on final passage. - Continued the sewer lateral fund discussion without action; staff will prepare options and multi-year projections. - Received the Q3 financial report and the Whitecliff Park Family Games/Pickleball/Amphitheater concept; schematic design is scheduled to begin November 9, 2026. - Adjourned to closed session immediately after the regular meeting to discuss legal, real estate, and contract matters under RSMo 610.021(1), (2), and (12).

The Saint Paul Housing & Redevelopment Authority (HRA) Board of Commissioners met on Wednesday, October 28, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. in Council Chambers, City Hall. Vice Chair Saura Jost called the meeting to order at 2:04 p.m.; four commissioners were present and three were absent. Commissioner Yang was excused, and Chair Johnson and Commissioner Kim later joined during the staff report portion. The Board voted 4-0 on two resolutions, received a staff introduction to a proposed Model Cities commercial loan restructuring, and continued the 2026 third-quarter budget report to the next meeting. Roll Call and Opening - Present: Commissioners Noecker, Bowie, Jost, and Coleman. Absent: Commissioners Yang (excused), Johnson, and Kim. - Chair Cheniqua Johnson joined remotely during the meeting; Commissioner HwaJeong Kim arrived during the staff report portion. Discussion Items - RES 26-1793 – Smith Avenue Parking Ramp easements: Sponsored by Chair Johnson. Executive Director Melanie McMahon presented the request to grant the City of Saint Paul a temporary easement via a right-of-entry permit for the Capital City Bikeway project, and to grant District Heat and Energy (or an affiliate/subsidiary) a permanent easement for heating and chilled water piping at the HRA-owned Smith Avenue Parking Ramp and Transit Center, 145 N. Smith Avenue, District 17, Ward 2. McMahon said no interior ramp access was needed, HRA parking operations would not be affected, and the two-part construction was expected to take about two months. - RES 26-1794 – Maryland Park Apartments HOME loan actions: Sponsored by Commissioner Yang. According to the minutes, Commissioner Coleman moved adoption approving the assignment and assumption of an existing HOME loan, extension of its maturity date, subordination to a new first mortgage, and execution of related loan documents for Maryland Park Apartments at 1619 Maryland Avenue East, District 2, Ward 6. Staff Report: Model Cities BROWNstone Commercial Loans (SR 26-236) - Debt Administrator Jenny Wolfe presented proposed amendments to loans related to the Brownstone, a four-story mixed-use building with 35 rental housing units and approximately 20,000 square feet of commercial/retail space on the north side of University Avenue at Victoria Street. - Background: Model Cities began operations in 1967 and has been active in community development in Summit-University and Frogtown since 1987. The commercial project was financed separately; the development cost about $5.5 million, and the HRA and city loans totaled more than $3 million. - The HRA loan originated through a 2003 $2.5 million St. Paul & Minnesota Foundation agreement for the Housing 5000 initiative, was later tied to Green Line transit-oriented development, and $2.3 million was approved for the Brownstone in 2016. The foundation loan matures December 1, 2026, with a current balance of about $1.5 million and a $500,000 recourse obligation for the HRA. Model Cities could not obtain a private loan to repay the maturing balance; staff said the existing HRA loan also had a $1.5 million balloon that came due June 5 and was unpaid. - Proposed restructuring: amend the foundation loan to extend it 10 years, with first payment due February 2027, maturity in December 2036, 240-month amortization, and potential forgiveness of up to $650,000 at three measurement dates if operating metrics are met. The amended HRA loan would mirror those terms, with payments due 15 days before HRA pays the foundation, 2% interest compared to the 1% rate charged to the HRA, and the HRA's first mortgage retained. Staff said the terms are contingent on forgiving two older city loans. - Staff also proposed forgiving a $300,000 STAR loan and a $356,000 CDBG loan, and deferring a $120,000 STAR loan with payments beginning January 2037. The two forgiveness amounts total $656,000. The past-due loans placed Model Cities on the adverse lending list; it could be removed after six consecutive on-time payments. - Staff said the deferral of the $120,000 STAR loan would reduce next year's STAR budget revenue by about $17,000, a roughly 5% variance not considered material. Staff stated that forgiving the CDBG loan would not harm the city's relationship with HUD because it was structured as a cash-flow loan and the HUD national objective had been met. Commissioner and Stakeholder Positions - Commissioner Noecker said she was uncomfortable with the HRA remaining in a middleman position with a large recourse obligation. She noted staff's first request had been for the foundation to deal directly with Model Cities, but the foundation declined. She called the large balloon payment structure unrealistic and, at some point, cruel, and encouraged pushing philanthropic partners to support the community; she also took responsibility for not catching the 2016 terms. - Chair Johnson said she was supportive of Model Cities and had advocated for it behind the scenes, but stressed that any HRA recourse payment would come from public HRA dollars. She asked whether metrics failure would trigger the $500,000 recourse; staff clarified that the HRA's obligation would not be triggered by missed monthly payments, only at loan maturity in 2036. - Commissioner Bowie praised Model Cities' deep community ties, affordable housing leadership, and low-barrier commercial opportunities for entrepreneurs in the Rondo/Frogtown/University corridor. - Commissioner Kim said the balloon payment structure was not something she would counsel clients to take on and called it predatory, while expressing trust in Model Cities' leadership. - Model Cities CEO Kizzy Downie and Community Development Director Dean Carlson thanked the board and described challenges: commercial tenants struggled, especially during the period around Operation Metro Surge; two leases ended and spaces were being refilled; Model Cities also pays rent in the building; and property taxes on the commercial parcel rose from about $45,000 to about $93,000 per year. The transcript at one point says 9300, but later context indicates $93,000. Downie said the organization is making its first-half property tax payment and may structure the second-half payment over five years if needed. Carlson said Ramsey County reduced the property's assessed value for taxes payable in 2027 by roughly 70 percent, which should lower taxes from the 2026 level. Downie asked the board to consider sharing more of the risk that Model Cities carries. Staff Report: 2026 Third Quarter Budget to Actual (SR 26-237) - Deputy Director Green began the budget presentation, noting that the board had asked for all information in one place with graphic visuals and that reporting had been adjusted. Because of time constraints, the board agreed to continue the item rather than rush the presentation. Key Outcomes - RES 26-1793 was adopted 4-0 (Noecker, Bowie, Jost, and Coleman voting yes; Yang, Johnson, and Kim absent). - RES 26-1794 was adopted 4-0 on Commissioner Coleman's motion, with the same vote and absentees. - SR 26-236 was received and filed; formal resolutions authorizing the Model Cities loan amendments and forgiveness are scheduled for November 4, 2026. - SR 26-237 was referred/continued to the HRA meeting due back November 4, 2026. - The next regular meeting is November 4, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. The meeting adjourned at 2:56 p.m.

The Gallatin Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization’s Transportation Policy Coordinating Committee met on October 28, 2026, to conduct first reviews of the draft Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and the draft Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for federal fiscal years 2027–2031. The committee also heard public comments on regional transit and rail feasibility, and received staff updates on ongoing studies. Note: The agenda on file for this date identifies the meeting as the “Transportation Technical Advisory Committee” meeting of October 14, 2026, but the actual proceeding (based on the transcript) was the Policy Coordinating Committee and occurred on October 28, 2026. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: The committee unanimously approved the minutes of the July 22, 2026 meeting (4–0 vote). Public Comments & Testimony - Ethan Johnson (resident): Expressed strong support for adding a light-rail or tram system to connect Belgrade, Bozeman Airport, downtown Bozeman, and 19th Avenue. He requested a feasibility study and offered to share materials via email. - Darren Broken (Executive Director, Big Sky Transportation District): Discussed the importance of regional connections between the two Urban Transportation Districts (UTDs) in Gallatin County. He noted that Big Sky UTD is pursuing an MOU to purchase property in the Four Corners area for a transit center and park-and-ride, and asked how the Big Sky UTD could become a non-voting member of the MPO. Discussion Items First Review of the Draft Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Jeff Butts (MPO staff) presented the LRTP, which carries forward existing local plans and incorporates new opportunities. Key policies presented include Vision Zero (eliminating fatal/serious injury crashes), traffic calming, complete streets, low-stress bikeways, transit priority corridors, and regional transit connections. The plan includes $170.9 million in near-term projects across roadways, bridges, walking/bicycling, transit operations, and safe routes to school. Modeling showed potential capacity issues in Belgrade, Four Corners, and downtown Bozeman by 2050. Public comment on the LRTP: - Darren Broken: Asked for clarification on the definition of “regional” in the plan. - David Kack (Big Sky Transportation District / Western Transportation Institute): Noted that Gallatin County completed a Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) safety action plan, and that Bozeman and Belgrade are beginning theirs. He emphasized mode shift and transit over road expansion, citing the $42.5 million cost of the one-mile Keggy Boulevard project. Board discussion on the LRTP: - Jim Hansen (board member): Commented that the policies are too broad and not actionable; he recommended adding key performance indicators, timelines, and tying screening criteria to policies. He favored fewer but more targeted policies. - Commissioner Bowdy (board member): Praised the plan’s resources but suggested changing the color scheme of a crash map (Figure 6-11) to improve accessibility for colorblind users. She also recommended explicitly naming Livingston, Big Sky, and Three Forks as interregional destinations. - Mayor Morrison (board member): Echoed support and noted the challenge of declining bike/walk/carpool mode share and the need for regional collaboration on transit to Big Sky. First Review of the Draft Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for FY2027–2031 Jeff Butts presented the TIP, which programs $170.9 million in federal and state funding for 24 road/bridge projects and numerous walking/bicycling projects. Highlights include Keggy Boulevard reconstruction ($42.5M), Main Street Belgrade reconstruction (design and right-of-way only), and transit operations (approximately $1.5M federal per year). No public comments were received. Board discussion on the TIP: - Commissioner Bowdy questioned the transit performance targets, noting that two-year and four-year targets were identical and that emissions targets were set at “greater than zero.” She expressed concern that these did not reflect improvement goals. - Katie Potts (FHWA Montana Division) explained that MDT sets emissions targets at “greater than zero” because only Missoula MPO is in non-attainment; setting higher targets could limit flexibility of CMAQ funds. - Mayor Morrison acknowledged the transparency of the tables and the high cost of infrastructure. Jim Hansen requested that future presentations include information on how projects were prioritized. Key Outcomes - No formal action was taken on either the LRTP or the TIP; both items were first reviews. - The LRTP will be revised based on board feedback, reviewed by the Transportation Technical Advisory Committee, then opened for a 30-day public comment period (November 9 – December 8, 2026) before returning to this committee for adoption on December 16, 2026. - The TIP will follow a similar path: review by TTAC, public comment period, and final adoption on December 16, 2026. - The committee agreed to hold a dedicated discussion on performance targets (including transit and emissions) around August 2027. - Staff will investigate updating the GVMPO website to correctly link to meeting materials.