The Public Meeting Index

The DeKalb County Board of Commissioners met on Tuesday, September 29, 2026, at 9:00 AM in Multipurpose Room A1201 at 178 Sam's Street, Decatur, GA. The meeting included an inspirational performance, two proclamations, extensive public comment, and decisions on several high-profile items including a data center ordinance, an urban camping ordinance, and authorization of litigation against Blackhall entities. Presentations & Proclamations - Arts Awareness Month: Commissioner LaDena Bolton presented a proclamation recognizing October as Arts Awareness Month, highlighting the reinstatement of the DeKalb Arts Council (launched March 12, 2026) and a $500,000 initial investment. Arts Council Director Rains and council members were recognized. - Senior Center Month: Presiding Officer Chakira Johnson proclaimed September 2026 as Senior Center Month, noting that the county's seven senior centers welcome more than 37,000 visits annually, with the East Central DeKalb Center seeing over 27,000 visits. Commissioner Mereda Davis Johnson and Director Scott spoke. Consent Calendar - Approved: Termination of three airport leases (items 2026-1307, 1308, 1314), a new T-Hangar lease (2026-1364), and acceptance of $90,000 in GRPA Boost funding for afterschool/summer programs (2026-1291). - Deferred: Meeting minutes from September 22 and September 24, 2026 (items 2026-0715, 0732) to October 13 BOC. Public Comments & Testimony Speakers addressed multiple issues: - Jan Dunaway (District 4) criticized lack of transparency on the data center ordinance, stating the definitions are "not protective of citizens." - Stephen Benny raised election preparedness concerns, questioned county plans for potential ICE raids, and urged fighting the Shadow Box lawsuit rather than settling. - MacIntyre (no full name given) argued the county's data center tour was deceptive, comparing it to a hyperscale Lovejoy Data Center campus the size of PDK airport. - Lindsay Farrell (educator, volunteer with Home for Everyone) asked commissioners to "tear up the urban camping ordinance," stating her students ask "where are they to go?" - Ella Gamel argued "people who are unhoused do not need an urban camping ordinance, they need housing," noting a shipping container village could be built in 6–9 months. - Joan Munro (Stone Mountain) requested mosquito abatement (citing a West Nile case in Tucker) and police assistance with drug/gun violence in her neighborhood. - Jackie Malcolm called for a health environmental impact study before approving any data center campus, citing water contamination risks and diesel generator pollution from other states. - Akilah McDaniel (Decatur) cited research that 9 out of 10 people remain housed after receiving housing-first assistance, and recommended a housing-first approach over criminalization. - Sam Levy (District 2) urged withdrawal of the urban camping ordinance, noting 700 individuals are under arrest awaiting mental health/substance abuse screenings, creating a $28 million backlog. - Liana Rubinstein (Compassionate Atlanta) implored the board to use compassion and stop wasting time on criminalization. - Tiana Jones Moore (Decatur) opposed the urban camping ordinance and also criticized funding for a joint police/fire training facility (item 2026-1387). - Gina Mangum (District 7) accused the board of corruption and lack of transparency, specifically regarding data center ordinance without citizen input. Discussion Items 2027 Calendar (2026-1400): Commissioners discussed proposed adjustments to meeting dates for holidays and spring break. Commissioner Long Spears suggested moving meetings from Tuesday to Thursday after holidays; Commissioner Patrick requested canceling the COW during spring break and July 4th week. The item was deferred to October 13 BOC for final adoption. Data Center Ordinance (2026-1273): Commissioner Terry normal coursed the item after a substitute was presented by the presiding officer. The original item (to amend Chapter 27 with definitions and classifications) was normal coursed, meaning it will require two readings. No action was taken. Urban Camping Ordinance (2026-0550): After extensive public comment and commissioner debate: - Commissioner Long Spears moved to withdraw the item, stating the goal should be a stakeholder group to address homelessness compassionately. - Commissioner Terry supported withdrawal, citing 700 individuals in jail for criminal trespass with mental health/substance issues, spending 400+ days on average, costing $28 million annually. - Commissioner Bolton requested it be heard in ERPS committee instead of PECS. - Commissioner Davis Johnson urged balance between public safety and compassion. - Commissioner Patrick opposed withdrawal, arguing conversation should continue; the item had been deferred multiple times since March 2026. - The motion to withdraw failed (4-2). The original motion to defer to October 13 BOC with a stop in PECS carried 4-2. Civilian Oversight of Digital Shield (2026-0769): Commissioner Terry argued for an independent civilian oversight board for the county's surveillance infrastructure, noting that the city of Atlanta recently found abuse of flock cameras. Commissioner Bolton said quarterly presentations are already provided. Commissioner Davis Johnson clarified that flock does not perform oversight. The item was deferred to October 13 BOC with a stop in ERPS. Financial Advisor Services (2026-0839): Deferred to October 13 with a stop in FAB, pending updated information. Executive Session & Litigation Authorization: The board recessed into executive session to discuss litigation. Upon reconvening, a motion carried to authorize the county attorney to file a lawsuit against Blackhall Real Estate Phase Two, LLC and Blackhall Capital Partners One, LLC for breach of contractual obligations under a January 29, 2021 real estate exchange agreement. Key Outcomes - Urban Camping Ordinance: Motion to withdraw failed; deferred to October 13 BOC with stop in PECS (vote 4-2). - Data Center Ordinance: Normal coursed (no vote). - Civilian Oversight Resolution: Deferred to October 13 BOC with stop in ERPS. - 2027 Calendar: Deferred to October 13 BOC. - Litigation: Authorized lawsuit against Blackhall entities (unanimous). - Various Purchasing Items: Several deferred or approved as noted in the consent agenda and preliminary items. - Appointments: Two appointments to the Environmental Justice and Sustainability Resident Review Group were recorded; two appointments to the Board of Family and Children Services were deferred.

The Astoria City Council and Planning Commission held a joint work session on September 29, 2026, from 6:00 PM to 8:49 PM in the Council Chambers. The meeting included presentations on the Housing Capacity Analysis (HCA) and the 2027-28 Community Development Department (CDD) Work Plan. Discussions highlighted significant concerns over the balance of housing needs, severe constraints on buildable land, and critical staffing capacity limitations. Note: The agenda and transcript list the date as Monday, September 28, 2026, but this summary is required to use the date September 29, 2026. Agenda Setting - City Manager Scott Spence reviewed the upcoming work sessions for the remainder of the year, covering a development review audit update, municipal code modernization, a council handbook review, and regional board assignments. - Councilor Adams requested information on the upcoming Doboy and Veterans Awareness event. Housing Capacity Analysis and Contextualized Housing Need - Consultant Steve Faust (3J Consulting) and Violet Brown presented the Housing Capacity Analysis (HCA), a state requirement for cities over 10,000 in population. The HCA will determine if Astoria has enough land to meet state-assigned housing production targets over the next 20 years. - Violet Brown presented the Contextualized Housing Need (CHN). She reported that the state Department of Administrative Services (DAS) allocation identifies that approximately 60% of required new units are targeted for households earning less than 60% of Area Median Income (AMI), with 36% for those under 30% of AMI. Demographics showed a median age of 40, 19% of the population living with a disability, and 17% living in poverty. The median home price was cited as $535,000 (May 2026), requiring an income of roughly $160,000 per year to afford. - Mayor Fitzpatrick expressed significant concerns about a perceived over-emphasis on subsidized housing in the report. He argued Astoria has added 196 income-restricted housing units while the population grew by only 400, and that the city must focus on workforce housing for healthcare workers and other essential staff. He requested data on foreclosures and evictions. - Violet Brown clarified that the CHN is a legally required section focused on vulnerable populations, stating it is only one component of the larger HCA which will examine the full housing market. - Commissioner Corcoran questioned the relevance of the selected peer cities (e.g., Pendleton) and asked for analysis to consider the local geography and the regional housing shed. - Councilor Adams asked about the public engagement plan. Staff confirmed a public meeting is scheduled for October 27, along with stakeholder focus groups and an online survey. - Consultant Steve Faust presented the preliminary Buildable Lands Inventory (BLI). Of 2,285 gross acres zoned for residential, roughly 58% are environmentally constrained by steep slopes, flood hazards, or landslide susceptibility. A separate Development Ready Lands Inventory will represent an even stricter subset of land for near-term development. - Councilor Davis questioned the methodology of the state population projections and how second homes and vacation rentals are weighted. The consultant noted that clarification is pending a state webinar. - Commissioner Hafker asked whether home cost figures would be updated from the May 2026 snapshot to reflect current market drops and interest rate changes. Community Development Department 2027–28 Work Plan - Director John Roberts presented a stark overview of department capacity. The CDD has 7 Full-Time Employees (FTE) but Director Roberts estimated the current workload could justify 13-14 FTE. He reported the department is processing over 200 planning applications annually and issued $85 million in building permits in 2025 alone. - A significant workload is driven by unfunded state mandates. Discretionary priorities for staff effort include modernizing the development code, implementing the housing action plan, finalizing short-term rental (STR) amendments, and historic preservation. - Director Roberts asked the council and commission for direction on how to sequence the department's discretionary capacity. - Mayor Fitzpatrick requested that staff return with a breakdown of work into three categories: projects best suited for external consultants, projects for internal focus requiring deep local knowledge, and projects that can be deferred or tabled. - Councilor Mazzarella and Councilor Davis expressed a strong preference for hiring an additional full-time employee over contracting out work, arguing it would build institutional knowledge and provide a local employment opportunity. - Councilor Adams requested a detailed cost comparison between using contract staff for the STR program and the cost of a full-time position. - President Corcoran noted that the planning burden is exacerbated by the high density of non-profits in Astoria (e.g., CMH, Library) who require extensive planning services but pay no property taxes. - Director Roberts made a point to commend his current team (Tiffany, Sam, Denise, Teresa, Carrie, Ed) for their resilience and competence. Key Outcomes - Staff will return to a future meeting with a prioritized breakdown of the CDD work plan, categorizing projects for consultant outsourcing, internal staff focus, and deferral. - The council broadly supported prioritizing the addition of a new FTE over regular consultant use, pending the requested cost-benefit analysis. - The HCA process will continue with a public meeting on October 27, 2026. - Council and commission leadership affirmed a goal of holding a joint work session at least annually to align on priorities.

Note: The agenda and transcript indicate the meeting occurred on September 22, 2026, but the provided meeting date is September 29, 2026. This summary uses the latter date as instructed. The Half Moon Bay City Council held a special meeting to hear an appeal by Marriott International, Inc. (operator of the Ritz-Carlton Half Moon Bay) contesting the Tax Administrator's final determination of delinquent Transient Occupancy Taxes (TOT), penalties, and interest totaling $2,129,685. The appeal challenged charges for group cancellation fees, resort fees, miscellaneous fees, all penalties, and additional interest accrued due to a delay in the city’s response. After staff presentations and appellant testimony, the council voted 5-0 to deny the appeal except for waiving $190,872 in additional interest, upholding the original determination of $2,164,112. Public Comments & Testimony - Mathieu Olivier (Marriott Market Vice President) introduced the appeal as a request for fair interpretation of unclear rules, stating the property acted in good faith. - Laura Floyd (Marriott Senior Director) testified that the hotel was deprived of the ability to collect tax due to surprise assessments; that group cancellation fees are not occupancy-related (distinguishing them from guaranteed no-show charges); that the city failed to respond to the appeal within the required 10-day period; and that penalties should be waived absent fraud or negligence. She offered a net payment of $932,000, conceding the food and beverage charge. - Andrew Salthoff (Owner CEO) urged a resolution, offering to pay $850,000 immediately. No other public comments were received. Discussion Items Staff and HDL representatives presented the audit findings covering calendar years 2021–2024, identifying four categories: group cancellation fees ($737,909 TOT due), miscellaneous fees ($69,000), food and beverage packages (conceded by appellant), and resort fees. They argued that the city’s broad definition of “rent” (all receipts without deduction) covers these charges, and that a prior 2015–2017 audit had already flagged resort fees. Staff recommended upholding the full determination except for $190,872 in additional interest accrued during the city’s delayed response (November 2025 to August 2026). Councilmembers questioned whether the ordinance clearly covers cancellation fees and resort fees, noting the broad language intentionally covers various fees. HDL confirmed that 99% of their client jurisdictions use similar broad definitions, and that group cancellation fees are commonly considered taxable. The appellant’s reference to Los Angeles’ Proposition TC was not deemed directly applicable because it was a distinct ordinance change. Key Outcomes - Motion and Vote: Councilmember (unnamed) moved to adopt a resolution denying the appeal and upholding the Tax Administrator’s final determination, with the exception of waiving the $190,872 in additional interest (representing the period of city delay). The motion was seconded and passed unanimously (5-0): Councilmembers Brownstone, Jonsson, Nagengast, Vice Mayor Penrose, and Mayor Ruddick all voted yes. - Directive: Staff were directed to take all actions necessary to collect the amounts due (total $2,164,112, reflecting the original determination), including filing a lien against the property if needed. - Resolution Update: The resolution will be revised to conform to the specific motion and vote.

The Bloomington City Council met on September 29, 2026, with Councilmember Hopi Stasberg (District 3), Clerk Crossley, and the presiding officer present. No formal agenda or minutes were available, so this summary is based on the raw transcript. The meeting opened at 9:00 a.m. (metadata timestamp 2026-09-29 14:12:20 UTC) and focused on one appointment and an update on the public transportation board. Appointment: Commission on the Status of Black Males - The council considered the sole application for a vacancy on the Commission on the Status of Black Males, submitted by Justice Belton after a resignation in July. - Crystal, the commission liaison, wrote the previous day that she highly recommended Belton and noted that he won the Outstanding Leaders of Today award in 2021. - Councilmember Stasberg remembered Belton favorably and said his application looked great. - Stasberg moved to appoint Belton; the motion was seconded and approved unanimously. Discussion: Public Transportation Board Expansion - The council discussed the public transportation board's proposal to expand from five to seven members. - Although the transportation board appeared to think it could make the change on its own, council members said the council must amend Title Two of the city code instead. - James and Nancy were identified as the working group/subcommittee on the issue; the presiding officer had contacted them and hoped to speak with them before the next CCP meeting. - A staff member prepared a pros-and-cons summary. The presiding officer's main concern was recruitment, including the need to find another Republican to serve. - The presiding officer said an anticipated future collaboration between IU and BT made a larger board seem appropriate. - Because service has expanded outside city limits and rural transit is doing less, the council discussed possible collaboration with Monroe County and Ellettsville. One idea was to use "urbanized area" language, matching MPO terminology, and the presiding officer said they would be happy to update the relevant provisions. - The presiding officer had also raised the topic at the CCP meeting and planned to share the research summary there. Key Outcomes - Justice Belton was appointed to the Commission on the Status of Black Males by unanimous vote. - No formal action was taken on the transit board expansion; the presiding officer will continue research and engagement before the next CCP meeting. - The meeting was then adjourned.

The Mobile City Council held its pre-meeting on Tuesday, September 29, 2026, at 10:30 AM. The council reviewed and approved several routine items, discussed a range of purchase orders and resolutions, heard public petitions, and set public hearings for November 3, 2026. Notable discussions included the purchase of snow plows in preparation for future winter weather, the procurement of food service equipment for the new Regis Mobile Arena, and the use of discretionary funds for capital improvements. Consent Calendar - Approval of minutes from September 22, 2026. - Appeals request for waiver of noise ordinance for multiple dates and locations in October and May (with a change to the October 10th event on Dauphin Street ending at 10 p.m. instead of 11 p.m.). - Numerous purchase orders and resolutions were approved by consent, including: - Building access control system for Hurtail Street. - Chevrolet Truck dual rear wheel utility body. - Agreement with Arrington Curb and back excavation for fire training center improvements. - Purchase of 95-gallon plastic garbage carts ($46,468.35). - Rental and installation of a power supply unit at the cruise terminal ($88,200). - Sam Sarah vehicle usage tracking software for patrol vehicles ($84,932). - Concrete buggy for stormwater operations ($23,030). - Articulating aerial bucket truck ($201,899). - Two Honda ATVs and one side-by-side utility vehicle ($48,509.29). - Snow plow attachment systems for dump trucks. - Collision damage repairs ($20,673.72). - Assorted serving items and equipment for Regis Mobile Arena ($800,000). - Uniform items ($50,000). - Lease agreement with Safe Haven Baby Boxes ($16,500/year). - Transfer of funds from general fund to capital improvements fund (discretionary funds). - Appointment of Alison Milton to the Citizens Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee. - ABC license approvals for MAPCO, Casey's, and Gulf Coast Challenge special events. - Determination that appropriation to the National Maritime Museum serves a public purpose; Councilman Ronald and another council member added themselves to the funding allocation ($5,000 each from discretionary funds). Public Comments & Testimony - Randy Reed spoke regarding retiree insurance and the true cost of being placed on Medicare. - Mary Walker spoke regarding ambulance service at Theodore Fire Station on Old Military Road. - Sabrina Mass, representing concerned citizens, raised concerns about a city council representative asking Mobile Police Department to break policy and protocol. - Dr. Cindy Gibson of Altar Point Health provided details of a recent incident involving the Mobile Police Department. Discussion Items - Deannexation Ordinance (83044): Councilman Woods thanked the mayor for collaboration on the deannexation of certain land due to split jurisdiction. - Power Supply Unit Rental at Cruise Terminal: Councilman Reynolds questioned the rental duration. Staff clarified the rental is interim while a permanent unit is built (16-month lead time). - Sam Sarah Vehicle Tracking Software: Councilman Penn asked if the city already has a similar program (Motorpool). Staff confirmed PD is seeking the same for life cycle monitoring of vehicles. - All-Terrain Vehicles (ATVs) and Side-by-Side: Councilman Reynolds raised concerns about the intended use, noting his district has wooded areas needing ATVs for trespassing issues. Chief Barber stated the vehicles are for Mardi Gras supervisors and are replacing aging units. Reynolds and Woods discussed the need for ATVs in district six. - Snow Plows: A significant discussion centered on the purchase of snow plows for dump trucks, prompted by the 2025 snow event. Councilman Reynolds questioned whether snow plows could be used for non-weather purposes (e.g., Mardi Gras debris). Staff explained the plows are specialized and attach to dump trucks for snow, sleet, and freezing rain. Councilman Woods supported the purchase, noting areas like Wall Street and Providence Park were inaccessible for a week in 2025. Council President Penn cited prior preparation issues and praised the city's financial ability to be proactive. Councilwoman Carroll echoed support for public safety readiness. - Regis Mobile Arena Food Service Equipment ($800,000): Chief Baker requested expedited approval because the quote expires at the end of September. Councilman Penn objected to the last-minute consent item, stressing that the council should have advance notice of major FFE purchases. Mayor Stimpson apologized and noted the project manager is busy but promised to provide a list of upcoming FFE buys. The council ultimately did not object to the purchase, but members expressed a desire for earlier consultation. - Discretionary Funds and Capital Contingency: Councilman Woods asked about the balance of his district's unused discretionary funds and how to access the capital contingency for projects like sidewalks or turf fields. Staff explained that unused discretionary funds roll into a capital contingency account after three years, and the funds can be used for cost overruns through coordination with the city's project manager. Key Outcomes - All consent calendar items were approved without objection. - Public hearings were scheduled for November 3, 2026, on the following items: - Rezoning at Cochrane Causeway (R1 to I2). - Modification of PUD at Hillcrest Road. - Rezoning of 5070 O'Shell Road (R1 to B2). - Conditional use permit at 6455 House Ferry Road. - Modification of planned unit developments at Foreman Road and Dickens Ferry Road. - The council announced a committee meeting (Economic, Culture and Civic Development) at 1 p.m. with the City of Mobile PIM office. - No formal votes were recorded on individual items; all actions were taken by consensus or as part of the consent agenda.

The Regional Transportation Commission of Washoe County (RTC) and the Story County Board of County Commissioners held a historic joint special meeting on September 29, 2026, to discuss the Northeast Connector Feasibility Study Final Report and consider advancing the Vista Boulevard and La Posada Drive alignments into the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process. The meeting included extensive public comment, a staff presentation, and a board vote. Public Comments & Testimony - Justin Uhart (fifth-generation Nevadan, Panasonic engineer) expressed strong support for an aerial gondola system, citing a pre-approved feasibility study and potential to reduce I-80 traffic by 63-70%. He stated the gondola would be cheaper, faster, and fully electric. - Gary Troyer opposed the La Posada alignment, arguing it lacks traffic mitigation for neighborhoods and criticized the sudden revival of La Posada after being deemed not viable. - Fred Krueger (Highlands at Cimarron resident, 32 years of planning experience) vehemently opposed both alternatives, stating the real purpose is to open land for data centers and housing. He challenged a report claim that stakeholders did not comment. - Chris Riley (Tesla team member) urged advancing both alignments into NEPA, noting that 85% of survey respondents called I-80 congestion a critical problem. He detailed Tesla's $4.3 million investment in the Patrick Interchange merge lane expansion. - Don Tatrow (Redwood Materials) supported moving both alignments forward, citing impacts on recruiting, retention, and employee quality of life. He noted workers missing family events due to long commutes. - Daryl Gardeepi (Chairman, Reno-Sparks Indian Colony) opposed the project, stating RTC failed to consult the tribe. He showed confidential maps of cultural resources in the area, calling the area sacred and warning against destruction. - Jackie Perell (Panasonic Energy) expressed support for item 5.1, emphasizing the need for improved connectivity and emergency access for employees. - James Shepard (Sparks resident) argued for an interstate-quality freeway or electric light rail, and suggested toll incentives for carpools. - Mary Claire Landkey supported the connector but stressed the need for at least two lanes each way due to wildfire evacuation concerns. - Thomas Bagan (retired mining engineer) supported the connector but urged traffic modeling to assess cut-through traffic on Vista Boulevard, and recommended aggressive metering on I-80. - Kristen Geddes (Sky Ranch Estates resident, 20 years) argued that only the Vista corridor should advance based on cost, environmental impact, and predicted traffic performance. She noted Pyramid Highway already over capacity. - Joe Mudd (Highlands resident) opposed both alignments but preferred the Golden Eagle connector. He objected to La Posada turning the area into a "drive-thru town". - Mike Clark recommended widening I-80 to four lanes each way and building a new freeway (I-680 north) as a long-term solution. - Tracy Thomas opposed La Posada, citing safety concerns for cyclists and dangers to the Truckee Meadows Fire Department station, and suggested a western terminus farther north. - Jeff Donahue (My Ride to Work) supported alternative roadway options based on his company's experience with USA Parkway employee transportation. - Christine Biglieri (realtor, 35-year resident) urged careful study and community involvement, expressing concern that La Posada would lead to development in Palomino Valley. - Josh Abair opposed both alignments, arguing that adding roads induces demand and wastes tax dollars. He cited that the connector would carry less than 10% of peak demand and called for better transit alternatives. - Eddie Gunet (retired military, Wingfield Springs) opposed the connector and supported expanding I-80 instead, warning that one inch of road leads to sprawl and wildlife loss. - Justin Hagigi asked the board to not authorize either alignment, citing poor return on investment, high maintenance costs, fatality risk on two-lane roads, and lack of disclosed NEPA funding. - Teddy Elwell (fourth-generation Nevadan) opposed both alignments and recommended a light rail system on Union Pacific tracks, citing wildlife impacts and safety. - Zeback Purdue (Spanish Springs resident) opposed both alignments, arguing they would harm communities and wildlife, and that the real motive is to build houses. - Aloisa Phelps (40-year resident) focused on safety concerns, supporting a commuter railroad instead of shifting traffic to residential streets. - George Forbush (resident against La Posada connector, president of Nevada Predator Hunting Association) opposed both choices, urging expansion of I-80 first to preserve open space and cultural resources. - Public comments also included eight written emails received by the clerk. - Final public comment: Trista Gomez (Assembly candidate) expressed frustration at the lack of prior planning and urged better coordination with developers and tribes. Natha Anderson (Assemblymember) thanked the board for taking on the issue and noted that federal land ownership requires federal involvement. Fred Krueger reiterated opposition, calling the land publicly owned and urging open space preservation. Matthew Setty (business owner and NEPA practitioner) supported the project but strongly recommended developing a formal MOU with the Reno-Sparks Indian Colony to address cultural resource issues. Discussion Items - Staff presentation: Brian Byrne (RTC project manager) and Brian Gantt (Wood Rogers consultant) presented the final feasibility study. The study evaluated corridors to provide an east-west connection north of I-80 between East Spanish Springs/Sparks and the Tri-Center (USA Parkway area). Traffic increased 58% from 2013-2023, and the workforce at the Tri-Center grew 300%. Two alignments emerged: Vista Boulevard (estimated $275 million) and La Posada Drive (estimated $450 million). The draft report initially recommended Vista, but after public feedback, both were deemed feasible. - Public outreach: RTC received approximately 1,000 comments and 705 survey responses. About 85% of survey respondents said I-80 congestion is a critical issue; 60% wanted RTC to move forward, 31% wanted to explore other options. - Study updates: The La Posada Spur connection was eliminated. The final report acknowledged the MOU between City of Sparks and Reno-Sparks Indian Colony regarding Section 31 and 32 for a transportation corridor. The recommendation was revised to show both alignments as feasible for further NEPA evaluation. - Alternatives considered: Bill Thomas (RTC Executive Director) and Austin Osborne (Story County Manager) reviewed other efforts: an NDOT South Meadows Corridor feasibility study (cost $870 million - $1.6 billion), a rail feasibility study (initial phase capital $175 million, full build $1-1.2 billion, plus $11 million annual operating cost, needing Union Pacific approval and new operating authority), private transit (My Ride to Work: 1,500 employees daily), and RTC vanpool program (211 vans, 17,000 riders/month). Story County has master planned 10,000 homes near the Tri-Center, updated zoning, and partnered on the Patrick Interchange project. - I-80 widening: NDOT's I-80 widening project completed NEPA in September 2025, pre-construction underway, targeted construction start late 2027/early 2028, three-year project. - Board comments: Commissioner Garcia asked about feasibility study cost ($600,000 from local fuel tax) and funding for NEPA ($3-5 million, not yet identified). She supported advancing both alignments with tribal engagement. Vice Chair Reese emphasized the regional nature of the problem and supported studying both, noting that doing nothing is not an option. Mayor Lawson supported La Posada only, citing Sparks' MOU with RSIC to preserve antiquities, and opposed the Vista alignment. Chair Hill supported advancing both, noting a need for resilient road networks and advocating for future rail authority in the legislature. - Cost and funding: The NEPA process is estimated at $3-5 million; RTC plans to seek partners (Story County, state, businesses) before returning to the board. Key Outcomes - RTC Board Vote: A motion to authorize staff to advance both the Vista Boulevard and La Posada Drive alignments into the NEPA process, with an added directive to engage the Reno-Sparks Indian Colony from the beginning, passed 3-1 (three ayes, one nay). The nay was cast by Mayor Lawson, who supported only La Posada. - Story County Next Steps: Story County will consider a similar action at its next board meeting on October 6, 2026, at the Story County Courthouse. Vice Chair Gilman indicated the county will arrive at a meaningful participation level after staff consultation and public process.

The Spokane Valley City Council met on Tuesday, September 29, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall to consider a property acquisition related to a terminated affordable housing grant, receive updates on retail recruitment and economic trends, and review state-mandated development regulation changes. The council unanimously approved two motions related to property transfer and maintenance funding, and discussed participation in a regional homeless grant RFP. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were offered during either of the two public comment opportunities. Property Acquisition and Fund Allocation - Staff presented background on a 2023 ARPA-funded grant of $1.46 million to Reclaim for affordable housing and homeless services. The project stalled, and the city reimbursed $960,000 in allowable costs. A deed of trust secured $600,000 of that amount; the remaining $360,000 covered community benefits provided during program startup. - Through a settlement, Reclaim will deed the property at 10619 E Sprague Avenue back to the city in lieu of foreclosure. The property was originally purchased for approximately $525,000; current assessed value is about $475,000. - Motion 1: Authorized the city manager to finalize documents for the property transfer. Passed unanimously. - Motion 2: Allocated up to $30,000 from the originally committed Clifford ARPA funds to cover closing costs ($6,500) and security/maintenance (estimated $20,000–$25,000) through the end of 2026, pending council decision on future use of the property. Councilmember Kelly noted the need to prevent illegal camping. Passed unanimously. - Staff noted the city could later issue an RFP for affordable housing/homeless services that includes a property transfer, similar to a prior Habitat for Humanity project, allowing conditions like community engagement and safety measures. Retail Strategies Presentation - Economic Development Specialist Kyle Knutsen introduced Brooke Hill and John Mark Boozer of Retail Strategies, the city’s retail recruitment consultant since 2017. - Active retail interests include a fried chicken QSR in negotiations, a fast-casual Asian restaurant reviewing sites, a national hotel reviewing sites, an outdoor recreation retailer expressing interest, and a second fried chicken QSR in negotiations. - Previous recruitment wins: Chipotle, Burlington, Ulta, Maverick, Dave & Busters, Five Below, the recently opened McDonald’s, and pending specialty grocer and home furnishings retailer. Combined average annual sales of these nine stores is approximately $74 million; estimated annual sales tax revenue of $634,695 from all nine. - The firm conducts site analysis, attends ICSC trade shows, and maintains “pleasant persistence” with retailers. Challenges include limited available sites and deal feasibility. The northeast corner of Sprague and Pines remains difficult due to property ownership issues; a Circle K is pre-permitting but not confirmed. - Councilmembers requested recruitment targets such as Buckee’s, In-N-Out, Aldi, and a Disney store. EWU Economic Trends Update - Dr. Patrick Jones and Dr. Kelly Cullen of EWU’s Institute for Public Policy presented quarterly data. - Population: Spokane Valley added 600 new residents between April 1, 2025, and April 1, 2026, with net migration accounting for an estimated 540 of those. County growth was 4,600, 90% from net migration. - Labor Market: Civilian labor force grew 3%, employment rose 2.4%, and the July 2026 unemployment rate was 3.3% (below the state’s 4.5% and national 4.1%). This low rate may limit future growth. - Sectors: Healthcare dominates (20% of county workforce); retail and manufacturing employment have not grown. School districts drove government growth. - Housing: Single-family permits increased in Q2 2026 (58 units, above the eight-quarter average of 42). Multifamily permitting remained steady. Permitted values declined slightly, indicating more affordable construction. The median home resale price held at $435,000. Affordability indices improved for buyers and renters in recent quarters. - Retail Sales: Q4 2025 saw a 7.8% year-over-year increase; quarterly retail taxable sales exceeded $1 billion for the first time. For 2025, Spokane Valley outperformed both the county (5% vs. 2.2%) and the state (5% vs. 3.2%). Retail sales per capita reached $35,000, the highest in the county. - Outlook: Personal income is forecast to grow 6% in 2027. The state’s September forecast revised income growth upward. Development Regulations Overview - Community and Economic Development Director Mike Basinger and consultant Ethan Spoo (DOWL) outlined state-mandated changes to the municipal code to address the housing crisis. The city is taking a conservative approach, preserving existing flexible zoning like corridor mixed-use and transitional provisions. - Key requirements: - Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs): Must allow two per lot where single-family is permitted, no owner-occupancy requirement, minimum size 1,000 sq ft, impact fees capped at 50%. - Middle Housing: Must allow at least six of nine types (plexes, townhouses, etc.); up to 4-6 units per lot depending on affordability or transit proximity. - Co-Living Housing: Allow where six multifamily units are permitted; each sleeping unit counted as 1/4 dwelling unit for density. - STEP Housing (Shelter, Transitional, Emergency, Permanent Supportive): Cannot prohibit where residential uses/hotels are allowed; city may impose design and permitting requirements but not barriers. City can enter health and safety agreements with providers within 500 feet. - Parking Caps: For single-family, 1 space; multifamily, 0.5 spaces; zero for units under 1,200 sq ft or affordable/senior housing; for ADUs/middle housing, 1-2 spaces depending on lot size; for conversions, no additional spaces; for non-residential uses, reduced ratios. A city-commissioned parking study may allow higher limits if approved by the state. - Child Care: Family daycares (≤12 children) allowed in all residential dwellings; child daycares allowed in all zones except industrial and open space. - Land Divisions: Must allow administrative lot splits (with minimum lot sizes) and unit lot subdivisions. - Permit Timelines: City maintains 60-120 day review periods; new legislation requires a responsible official for residential projects. - Councilmembers expressed concerns about parking impacts, emergency access, senior housing, and state overreach. Staff noted they excluded courtyard apartments and stacked flats from middle housing options to better fit the valley’s character. The draft code will be presented on October 20. Council and City Manager Comments - Councilmembers reported on the Valley Fest parade, the successful Bob Furman International Cross Country event at Cross Course (3,200 runners from 115 schools across 10 states and Canada), and state legislative updates from AWC meetings. - City Manager John Holman and City Services Administrator Gloria Mance updated on the regional homeless grant process. The City of Spokane and Spokane County are issuing a joint RFP for approximately $40 million in homeless funds (state and local), with a target release of November 2, 2026. Spokane Valley was asked to participate by including its local recording fees ($600,000–$700,000 over two years) into the regional pool, foregoing geographic restrictions. The city’s homeless outreach contract ($300,000/year) could be at risk if not prioritized. Council expressed strong concerns about alignment with Spokane’s approach (preferred providers, focus on emergency shelters) and lack of influence with only one seat on the scoring committee. Councilmember Wick suggested a letter from the mayor to other jurisdictions advocating for outreach as a foundational service. Council reached consensus to explore that approach before deciding on participation. - The city manager also thanked Congressman Baumgartner and Senator Murray for securing $5 million for the Pines grade separation project, which is progressing rapidly. Key Outcomes - Motion 1 (Property Transfer): Unanimously approved to authorize the city manager to finalize documents for the property deed back to the city. - Motion 2 (Maintenance Allocation): Unanimously approved to allocate up to $30,000 from Clifford ARPA funds for closing costs and property security/maintenance. - Retail Strategies Update: Received; no formal action. - EWU Economic Trends Update: Received; no formal action. - Development Regulations Overview: Received; council will review draft code on October 20, 2026. - Regional Homeless Grant Participation: Council directed staff to explore a letter to other jurisdictions emphasizing outreach as a foundational element before a final decision on joining the joint RFP.

The Montgomery County Council convened on September 29, 2026, for a full-day session that began with two proclamations (Dolly Parton Day and Economic Development Week), followed by a consent calendar, a worksession on long-term solid waste disposal alternatives, public hearings on water and sewer plans and an OZAH fee schedule, and a district council session that took action on several zoning items. The meeting also included a closed session for legal advice and a youth town hall in the evening. Consent Calendar - The Council acknowledged receipt of two Inspector General publications: one concerning alleged misconduct by an Office of the County Attorney employee, and one concerning alleged misconduct by a Montgomery County Police Department executive. - Introduced a resolution to declare no further need for a portion of the Gude Landfill and to dispose of it via a long-term lease to Community Power Group LLC (public hearing scheduled for October 13, 2026). - Introduced and adopted a resolution approving a state grant petition for Montgomery College's Theatre Arts Building Renovation Project ($4,325,000). - Introduced and adopted a resolution approving a state grant petition for Montgomery College's Macklin Tower Library Project ($912,000). - Introduced and adopted a resolution confirming the appointment of Julie Anderson to the Friendship Heights Village Council. - Adopted resolutions confirming County Executive appointments to the Department of Permitting Services Advisory Committee (Radwan Chowdhury), Historic Preservation Commission (Marc Dominianni, Jennifer Kirwan, Karl Pitt), Commission on Landlord-Tenant Affairs (Donald Cooksey, Craig Kundrot), Commission for Women (Tiffany Boiman, Ana Bonilla, Stephanie Cardot, Georgia Coffey, Sheena Foster, Alyssa Sanders), and Commission on Children and Youth (14 appointees). - The consent calendar was approved with 10 votes in favor (one abstention noted as WJ ta). Public Comments & Testimony - Water and Sewer Plan Public Hearing (1:30 p.m.): Two speakers addressed the 2026-2035 Comprehensive Water Supply and Sewerage Systems Plan. - Joan Parrish (Friends of Ten Mile Creek and Little Seneca Reservoir) opposed granting sewer connections to RE1-zoned properties on Clarksburg Road, arguing that such changes would undermine the master plan and increase development pressure. She urged the Council to maintain the current policy excluding RE1 zoning from public water and sewer access. - Susina Lemma Ashame (applicant for a sewer connection at 21820 Clarksburg Road) supported the connection, explaining that she plans to develop an assisted living facility for a nearby 55+ community. She stated that the facility would allow seniors to remain close to friends and family as they age. Discussion Items - Worksession: Long-Term Alternatives for Solid Waste Disposal (9:30 a.m. – 11:15 a.m.): The Council heard a detailed presentation from ReWorld, the operator of the county’s Resource Recovery Facility (RRF). ReWorld emphasized that the RRF is a world-class system that diverts 90 million tons from landfills annually, generates 250,000 MWh of electricity (powering about 24,000 homes), recycles 10,000 tons of metal per year, and avoids 901,000 metric tons of greenhouse gases. They argued that trucking waste to landfills would be more expensive (citing a $1.4–1.8 billion higher lifecycle cost over 30 years compared to upgrading the RRF), increase truck traffic (100–160 trucks per day from the transfer station), and pose greater safety and environmental risks. ReWorld proposed a phased capital investment of $100 million less than the Arcadis estimate, with per-ton pricing and performance guarantees. Council members questioned ReWorld on emission exceedances (two events in 2025), continuous monitoring feasibility, PFAS destruction (99% at grate temperatures of 2,000°F), ash disposal options (including potential reuse as aggregate and a non-EJ landfill in Pennsylvania), and the financial implications of reduced waste volumes. Council Vice President Balcom and Councilmember Glass highlighted the deferred maintenance issue, noting that major capital needs were only brought to the Council’s attention two years ago. Councilmember Mink pressed for cost comparisons including selective catalytic reduction and more frequent testing. DEP Director Macedonia noted that a competitive procurement process would be needed for any long-term contract. - District Council Session (1:35 p.m.): - LMA H-161 (495 Self Storage LLC): Introduced; action tentatively scheduled for October 6, 2026. - ZTA 26-09 (Rural Village Center Overlay Zone – Vehicle Repair – Limited Use): The PHP Committee recommended enactment with amendments, including clarifying setbacks (50 feet from residential lot lines, with Planning Board authority to modify), allowing alternative shade tree structures (requiring equivalent tree planting elsewhere), and technical corrections. Councilmember Sales asked why heavy commercial vehicles (up to 16,000 lbs) were not included; staff explained that such repair is only allowed in industrial zones and a broader ZTA would be needed. - SMA H-163 (University Boulevard Corridor Plan): Adopted after re-noticing due to a duplicate application number. The vote was 8-3 (Councilmembers Mink, Katz, and Jawando voting no). Key Outcomes - Solid Waste Disposal Worksession: No vote taken; the Council will continue discussions at a future worksession with a comparative chart of environmental, fiscal, and community impacts. Staff will follow up on ReWorld’s answers regarding costs, emission controls, and ash reuse. - OZAH Fee Schedule: The Council adopted a resolution adding fees (25% of the prevailing conditional use fee or $540 plus $960 per square foot) for reinstatement of non-conforming uses (unanimous). - Zoning Ordinance Amendment Process: The Council approved revisions to the process for introducing and considering zoning text amendments, clarifying who may recommend a ZTA, transmission requirements, and withdrawal procedures (unanimous). - ZTA 26-09 (RVC Vehicle Repair): Enacted as amended (unanimous roll call vote, 11-0). - SMA H-163 (University Boulevard Corridor Plan): Adopted (8-3; Councilmembers Mink, Katz, and Jawando opposed). - Public Hearings: The hearing on the OZAH fee schedule was closed; the hearings on WSSC water spending control limits and the water/sewer plan remain open (record closes October 5, 2026, and September 29, 2026, respectively). - Closed Session: The Council met in closed session from 11:15 a.m. to discuss legal advice and litigation strategy regarding contractual rights and facilities. - Youth Town Hall: Scheduled for 6:00 p.m.

The Richmond City Council held an informal meeting on September 29, 2026, at 2:00 PM. The meeting included a docket review with several continuances, a presentation on the 2027 General Assembly legislative package, and a presentation on a Municipal Solar Power Purchase Agreement. Council members discussed these items but took no formal votes. Consent Calendar - Ordinance 2026-155 (item 1) was continued to the October 13 council meeting per the applicant's request. - Ordinance 2026-175 (item 2) was amended at the September 14 meeting and retained on the consent agenda. - Ordinances 2026-187, 2026-189, and 2026-190 (items 6, 8, 9) were continued to the November 9 council meeting based on planning commission or committee recommendations. - Ordinance 2026-195 (item 13) was flagged by Councilwoman McGibson for discussion, but no motion was made to move it to the regular agenda. - Several ordinances and resolutions (items 15-37) received standing committee approvals and were retained; Councilwoman Robertson was added as co-patron to resolutions R032 and R033 (items 33 and 34). - Resolution R037 (item 37) was continued to the October 13 meeting. - Ordinance 2026-081 (item 40) was retained on the regular agenda; item 41 (ordinance 2026-109) was continued to November 9; item 43 (ordinance 2026-196) was continued to October 13; items 44-82 were retained; and resolution R019 (item 83) was retained. Discussion Items 2027 General Assembly Legislative Package - Devin Cabot (CAPS Consulting) presented the draft legislative agenda. - The top priority is the Long-Term Owner Occupancy Program (LOOP), which requires a constitutional amendment; the city will request the first reference this year. - Housing policies include tenant protections and housing justice measures, expansion of local authority for vacant properties (including the urban public-private partnership redevelopment fund and enterprise zone real property investment grant), and short-term rental regulations. - Policy positions cover housing, human services, transportation, public safety, education, economic development, and administration, including support for eviction prevention, public housing redevelopment, K-12 funding formula modernization, and avoidance of unfunded mandates. - Budget requests include continued investment in drinking water infrastructure and funding for combined sewer outflow improvements. - Timeline: legislative summit on October 19, governor's amendments on December 17, and session start on January 13, 2027. - Council members expressed support; Councilwoman Gibson praised the package's representation of council interests. Vice President Jordan raised the possibility of revisiting charter changes, and Councilmember Lynch advocated for building on prior work rather than starting from scratch. Municipal Solar Power Purchase Agreement - Laura Thomas (Director of Sustainability) and Donald Lexi (Energy Program Manager) presented the proposal. - The project covers 39 public properties across all nine council districts, generating 5 megawatts of solar energy, and is projected to save $20 million in avoided electric costs over 25 years. - The power purchase agreement (PPA) has fixed rates with no escalators, while Dominion rates are set to increase 23.5% on July 1st and another 20% on July 1st, 2027. - The contract is based on a Prince William County Public Schools RFP, also used by the City of Roanoke and Richmond Public Schools, with Secure Solar Futures as the partner. - The city administration signed the contract in August; the council is being asked to approve site leases. The leases carry no cost or risk to the city, and each property will undergo structural and permitting reviews. - The project includes workforce development opportunities, such as training and apprenticeships. Key Outcomes - No formal votes were taken during the informal meeting. - The legislative package will be continued to the October 13 council meeting for amendments and adoption. - The solar PPA site leases will be presented for formal consideration at a future council meeting. - Several agenda items were continued to specific future dates as outlined in the consent calendar.