The Public Meeting Index

The joint meeting of the Committees on Legislation and Public Safety & Veterans was called to order at 1:26 PM and adjourned at 2:17 PM. The meeting addressed two distinct segments: first, routine legislative items including a red light camera program amendment and solid waste licensing changes, and second, a detailed presentation on the operational failures at Woodfield Cottage juvenile detention facility and the county's proposed takeover. All votes were unanimous (7-0, with two legislators absent). Minutes Approval - The minutes from the July 27, 2026 meetings at 10:00 AM and 1:00 PM were approved on motions by Legislator Nolan, seconded by Legislator Barr. The votes were 7-0. Discussion Items Red Light Camera Demonstration Program (2026-461 and 2026-462) - Assistant Chief Deputy County Attorney Justin Adin presented an amendment to Section 709.31 of the County Laws. The amendment expands the existing red light camera program to allow cameras at up to 50 county-owned intersections and any other intersections specifically authorized by state law, removing the need for a local law amendment each time a new state-authorized intersection is added. The resolution setting a public hearing (2026-461) and the local law itself (2026-462) were both signed by committee and referred to the full Board of Legislators on motions by Legislator Nolan, seconded by Legislator Barr. Votes were 7-0 in each committee. Solid Waste and Recyclables Collection Licensing (2026-463 and 2026-464) - Solid Waste Commission Executive Director Peri Kadanoff and Justin Adin explained the amendment to Section 826-a.200. The change clarifies that anyone collecting only food waste can obtain a Class F license rather than being required to hold a Class A or other license. The public hearing resolution and local law were signed by committee and referred to the full board on motions by Legislator Gashi, seconded by Legislator Barr. Votes were 7-0. Receive & File Six memos of legislation were received, filed, and approved unanimously (7-0): - 2026-399 (Hon. Tyrae Woodson-Samuels): Utility Bill Navigation and Energy Affordability Act to help residents access programs reducing energy costs. - 2026-423 (Hon. James Nolan): Property tax relief for first-time home buyers. - 2026-424 (Hon. James Nolan): Prohibition of propane tank storage/use on residential balconies. - 2026-425 (Hon. James Nolan): Westchester Drone Law establishing restrictions on unmanned aerial vehicles. - 2026-426 (Hon. James Nolan): ADA ride-sharing requirements for equitable transportation access. - 2026-427 (Hon. James Nolan): Creation of a County Office of the Inspector General. Presentation on Woodfield Cottage – Proposed County Takeover After the regular agenda, the Public Safety & Veterans Committee convened to hear a presentation from Commissioner of Probation Rocco Posey, joined by Deputy Commissioners Mary Gizella and Mona Barry. The presentation detailed the failure of the current private operator, Together for Youth, which took over on January 1, 2026, after Children's Village declined to renew. Commissioner Posey described the vendor's inability to meet staffing requirements despite a seven-month pre-contract notice and additional startup funding. Key problems included: - Critical staffing shortages leading to modified operations, increased room confinement, and inability to provide mandatory programming. - Failure to secure a food service contract; probation staff and deputy commissioners had to serve meals. A contract with Aramark was finally secured for October 1, 2026, through assistance from the Department of Corrections. - The county spent $1.6 million on a security contract to provide front reception, intake, and control room functions, allowing trained staff to move into direct care roles. - State regulators (OCFS) issued a corrective action plan—the first for Woodfield—citing inadequate staffing and lack of progress. - OCFS has strongly recommended county operation, noting that six of eight secure juvenile detention facilities in New York State are operated directly by counties or cities. Commissioner Posey argued that county operation would provide stronger accountability, competitive salaries/benefits to attract qualified staff, direct control over recruitment and training, and a safer environment for youth and staff. The projected annual cost of county operation is approximately $30.467 million, with state reimbursement covering about $28 million, leaving a net county responsibility of $2.461 million. This represents an increase of approximately $1.21 million over the cost of the current vendor contract. However, Commissioner Posey noted that the vendor's actual costs are uncertain due to heavy overtime and the $1.6 million security contract, which may already be pushing costs higher. He stated the county would seek to terminate the vendor contract with 15 days' notice and aim to transition by January 1, 2027, retaining core on-site staff. Key Outcomes - All four legislative items (red light camera and solid waste) were signed by committee and referred to the full Board of Legislators with unanimous votes. - The six memos of legislation were received, filed, and approved. - The Woodfield Cottage presentation concluded with strong support from committee members for the county takeover. Legislators acknowledged the additional net cost but emphasized the benefits of direct county control, citing prior vendor failures and the importance of safety and rehabilitation for youth. The County Executive is expected to send a pay plan amendment to create new county positions for the facility. - No formal vote was taken on the Woodfield proposal at this meeting, but the committee indicated it would move forward with the necessary legislation.

The Powell Development Corporation (PDC) held its second annual planning retreat on September 22, 2026. The meeting, chaired by Steve Flaherty, was a continuation of the work from the first retreat session on August 25, 2026. Members present included Megan Canavan, Steve Flaherty, Heather Karr, Philip Whitaker (excused at 2:14 PM), and City Manager Andrew White. Staff present included Sean Hughes, Samantha Borchers, and Elaine McCloskey. The primary focus was establishing a mission statement, defining overarching goals for the upcoming year, and developing specific objectives for each of the PDC's committees. The meeting adjourned at 3:00 PM on a motion by Mayor Karr, seconded by City Manager White, which passed 4-0. Mission Statement Discussion - City Manager Andrew White presented a draft mission statement: "to create a growing center of employment in the City of Powell needed to support enhanced quality of life for its residents." The board discussed aligning this with City Council goals, specifically 2 (Annexation), 3 (Intergovernmental Cooperation), 8 (Downtown expansion), and 9 (Business retention). A focus group consisting of Chair Flaherty, Megan Canavan, Mayor Karr, and City Manager White was formed to refine the statement for a future board vote and presentation to City Council. Downtown Committee Goals - Administrator Sean Hughes proposed restructuring the downtown entity as a formal committee of the PDC, modeled on the Heritage Ohio Main Street structure. Three major goals were identified: structure (subcommittees for events, property owners, and communications), connectivity, and advocacy. Megan Canavan emphasized the need for consistency, accountability, and wayfinding. Philip Whitaker added the goal of establishing a stronger Powell identity. The board agreed that hiring a PDC staff person focused on downtown is critical and discussed allocating 2027 budget funds directly to downtown initiatives. Business Retention and Expansion (BRE) Committee Goals - Administrator Hughes explained the Chamber of Commerce serves as the "first line" for BRE visits, with larger projects handed off to the PDC. Mayor Heather Karr noted the new Chamber director, Anjali, agrees that functions like the farmers market are downtown activities. Philip Whitaker exited at 2:14 PM after requesting clearer documentation of committee membership. The board stressed the need for a formal meeting with the Chamber to delineate roles and ensure the Chamber serves the entire business community. Entrepreneurialism Committee Goals - Chairman Flaherty discussed the committee's partnership with OWU's Entrepreneur Center. He noted that over 50% of businesses fail within five years and introduced a framework based on eight pillars of business success. The goal is to establish workshops, mastermind groups, and an entrepreneurship through acquisition club. Programming focuses on tech transfer, AI, and peer-to-peer support. The committee aims to launch quarterly events, progressing to monthly and weekly sessions. A fact sheet on business success pillars was requested, and the group agreed on a clear "customer journey" aligning with the Chamber. Real Estate Committee Goals - Administrator Hughes relayed the committee's goals (Chair Keller was absent): building a financial structure for investment, identifying opportunities, and utilizing a development pipeline. City Manager Andrew White discussed tactical site assembly and strategic annexation, noting that the city is landlocked but surrounded by developable land. He stated that 80-90% of workers in unincorporated areas already pay income tax elsewhere. Chairman Flaherty recommended the PDC monitor contiguous properties for sale. The committee agreed to create an inventory map of vacant and underutilized properties. Key Outcomes - Mission Statement Focus Group: Formed to draft a mission statement aligning PDC goals with City Council objectives. - Downtown Structure: The Downtown Committee will be restructured as a PDC committee with subcommittees, supported by a future PDC staff member and specific 2027 budget funds. - BRE Coordination: A formal meeting between the PDC and Powell Chamber of Commerce will be scheduled to delegate responsibilities and align goals. - Entrepreneurialism: The committee will develop entrepreneur curriculum with OWU targeting quarterly sessions eventually leading to weekly programming. - Real Estate Strategy: A strategic property inventory map will be created, focusing on tactical site assembly and annexation opportunities. - Chamber Partnership: A future joint meeting between the PDC and Chamber boards was proposed to foster collaboration.

The Pittsburgh City Council Committee on Hearings and Policy convened a public hearing on Tuesday, September 22, 2026, at 1:30 PM in Council Chambers at the City-County Building (510 City-County Building, 414 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, PA) to consider Bill 2026-0732, a resolution to designate the Allegheny Arsenal Officers Quarters and Wall Segments in the Lower Lawrenceville neighborhood (6th Ward) as a Historic Site under Title 11 of the Code of Ordinances. Councilmember Deborah Brose (District 7) presided. No members of the public registered or came forward to testify, and the hearing closed with the bill moving toward a full City Council vote. Presentation of the Nomination - Ms. Reed, presenting the nomination, stated that it was submitted on August 20, 2025, by Butler 40th LLC to satisfy a stipulation of the memorandum of understanding (MOU) between Butler 40th LLC and the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission (PHMC, the state historic preservation office), developed as part of the 2015 Arsenal Development Project. - The nomination covers ten assets on multiple parcels (49-E-128, 49-E-136, 49-E-132, 49-A-3, 49-A-5, 49-E-124, 49-E-120, 49-A-1): the Officers Quarters building and nine wall segments, including the wharf wall running along the railway. Nearby properties include Arsenal Middle School (the county Arsenal property), Nasser's Tavern, Tourney House, the Stephen Foster Community Center, and the Carnegie Library. - A 1908 historical photograph showed the wall segments as a complete wall at the time; current photographs showed the Officers Quarters building, the wharf wall, and wall segments that have been integrated into the new development. - Under Section 1101.04, the nomination asserts the site meets multiple designation criteria: criterion 1 (location as a site of a significant historic or prehistoric event or activity), 6 (site of an important archaeological resource), 7 (association with important cultural or social aspects or events in the history of the City, state, Mid-Atlantic region, or the United States), 9 (representation of a cultural, historic, architectural, or archaeological theme), and its unique location or distinctive physical appearance representing an established neighborhood community or the City of Pittsburgh. - The nominators found, and the presenter concurred, that the Allegheny Arsenal officers' quarters, wall segments, and magazine structures retain significant integrity of location, design, materials, and workmanship. (Note: the bill title names only the Officers Quarters and Wall Segments, while the presentation also referenced magazine structures.) - Procedural history: the Historic Review Commission issued a positive recommendation on June 3, 2026, and the Planning Commission issued a positive recommendation on June 16, 2026, before the bill reached this public hearing. - The legislation states that the owner of the property supports the nomination and that there is no cost to the City. - Councilmember Brose asked the clerk to confirm that the Historic Review packet would be attached to the legislation so the public could download it; the clerk confirmed it would be. Public Comments & Testimony - The clerk reported no registered speakers, and no unregistered speakers in the audience came forward to address Council. Councilmember Brose commented that she took the absence of testimony as "a good sign of public support for the project." Key Outcomes - The public hearing was held and closed on September 22, 2026. The meeting minutes record that the hearing was held to the Committee on Land Use and Economic Development (i.e., the bill was referred to that committee for further consideration). - The next step in the designation process is a full City Council vote on Bill 2026-0732; no vote date was stated in the meeting record.

The Harrisonburg Planning Commission held a work session on the Zoning Ordinance Update Project at City Hall, Room 011, convened at 6:00 p.m. and adjourned at 8:12 p.m. Six commissioners were present (Richard Baugh, Shannon Porter, Laura Dent, KC Kettler, Randy Seitz, and Rob Jezior, who participated remotely from Scranton, Pennsylvania); Heja Alsindi was absent. No public comment was taken. The agenda and minutes contain conflicting dates (September 15 and September 25, 2026), but this summary uses the provided meeting date of September 22, 2026. Discussion focused on proposed zoning district names and draft Articles D and H of the revised zoning ordinance. Consent Calendar - The agenda did not include a consent calendar; the Commission's unanimous approval of Commissioner Jezior's remote participation was a routine procedural action taken at the start of the meeting, upon motion by Vice-Chair Porter and second by Councilmember Dent. Public Comments & Testimony - No oral public comment was received; the agenda stated that no public comment would be accepted at the work session. - Written feedback from the Harrisonburg-Rockingham Association of Realtors (HRAR), included in the agenda packet, emphasized that district names communicate the general character and development pattern of an area to residents, prospective buyers, and property owners. Discussion Items Zoning District Names - Staff said the recommended district names had not changed since the prior meeting. - HRAR feedback, obtained through outreach by Commissioner Seitz, emphasized the importance of names that clearly describe neighborhood fabric and development patterns. - Commissioners discussed the three residential districts: Suburban Neighborhood, Flexible Neighborhood, and Urban Neighborhood, and agreed to change Flexible Neighborhood to General Neighborhood. - Staff and commissioners agreed to change Garden Community to Apartment Community because apartment is more understandable than terms such as multifamily or garden-style. - The phrase higher density will be removed from the Attached Community district intent statement to avoid confusion when read outside the sequence of district descriptions; intent statements will be reviewed for clarity. - Single-family attached is effectively a duplex where the two units are separated by a lot line; a duplex without separate lots is a duplex, and a building with more than two attached units on individual lots is a townhouse. One commissioner expressed concern about introducing single-family attached as new terminology when duplex is widely understood. - Staff said the district originally contemplated for garden-style apartment complexes such as Sunchase and Arcadia is now proposed as Apartment Community. Staff are still considering where more traditional urban-form multifamily buildings, including larger buildings with internal corridors and elevators, should be accommodated, possibly in Mixed-Use Urban Village or Auto-Urban Commercial through a special exception. - One commissioner stated that garden-style apartments and attached residential forms should not automatically be characterized as high density because their form and intensity differ from larger urban apartment buildings. - Staff explained that Mixed-Use Urban Village is being considered for mixed-use areas outside downtown, as distinct from Mixed-Use Downtown. Draft Article H - Development Review Procedures - Staff described three proposed review tracks: site plan review for development requiring engineering review and addressing infrastructure, public improvements, and zoning; building permit review when a site plan is not required; and zoning permit review for standalone zoning compliance when neither a site plan nor building permit is required. - A commissioner raised concerns about added time, cost, and burden of a zoning permit for minor resident improvements such as a utility shed or low fence. Staff responded that existing surveys or plats could usually be used, and floodplain compliance is an important reason for review because FEMA requires permits for floodplain improvements. A building permit is not required for a shed under 256 square feet, but zoning compliance would still be checked under the proposed zoning permit. - Commissioners acknowledged that proactive review before construction may reduce neighbor disputes and costly post-construction corrections, even though it adds process. - Site plan review would be presumed unless an activity is exempt. Proposed exemptions include construction of a single-family detached dwelling or duplex on an existing lot, additions to a single-family dwelling or duplex, and interior renovations that do not increase floor area. Subdivision requirements, such as sidewalk connections, would still apply when an existing lot is subdivided. - Staff proposed changes to plats, surveys, foundation-location surveys, and certificates of occupancy. Harrisonburg currently requires certified location information less frequently than many jurisdictions; hand-drawn sketches would still be accepted for residential additions and accessory structures when sufficient certified survey or plat information exists, but a survey may become part of permitting when none exists. - Staff reviewed the proposed proffer-revision process. The Planning Commission would make its recommendation based on proffers submitted at its public hearing; an applicant could submit amended proffers until publication of the City Council public hearing notice; afterward, City Council could consider further amendments until the hearing closes and decide whether a material change warrants an additional public hearing. - Staff stated that the draft zoning map does not broadly upzone properties solely to increase development potential; retaining a rezoning process preserves the City's ability to seek mitigation through proffers. The Future Land Use Guide is long-range, and staff cautioned that immediately rezoning everything designated for higher density could outpace water, sewer, and transportation capacity. Commissioners discussed the need to balance housing development with infrastructure, community character, and a predictable review process. - On nonconforming properties, staff cited West Washington Street as an example where existing single-family and duplex residences sit in the M-1 General Industrial District; the draft map recommends a residential district to make those uses conforming. Staff said a comprehensive nonconformity overlay would require point-in-time determinations for every property, while a structure's nonconforming setback is generally stable and a nonconforming use may be lost after discontinuance. - Staff proposed allowing amendments to approved proffers without new public hearings in limited circumstances. The current amendment process can take 90 to 120 days and often leads applicants to submit less detailed proffers. Under state law, City Council could waive public hearings for proffer amendments that do not change approved use or density, with notice and advertisement still required and Council retaining discretion to deny waivers. Commissioners discussed public-perception concerns and examples from Rockingham County, such as Preston Lake. - Staff reviewed corner-lot provisions intended to preserve a usable building area on narrow corner lots by limiting how much a side-street setback consumes buildable width; a property owner may seek a variance from the Board of Zoning Appeals if a hardship remains. - Staff reviewed setback-reduction provisions allowing use of the average setback of the two nearest structures or the average along a block, helping additions and porches align with the streetscape. One commissioner suggested evaluating whether a median might be more appropriate than an average. - A commissioner raised Section 10-3-63.B, which limits architectural projections into a required setback to 2 feet, 8 inches, and suggested increasing it to 3 feet or 3 feet, 4 inches to give residents flexibility for roof or canopy covers over front stoops. Staff noted the draft districts reduce many front setbacks from 30 feet to 20 feet, which may help, and will evaluate the proposed increase and consult Building Inspections on fire-spread and building-code issues. - A commissioner asked whether more decisions could be handled administratively. Staff agreed some matters may be appropriate for administrative review, citing townhome development standards as an example, and noted that a parallel update to the Design and Construction Standards Manual (DCSM), including bicycle and pedestrian planning, Safe Routes to School, and Complete Streets work, will inform future standards. Key Outcomes - Unanimously approved remote participation for Commissioner Jezior. - Staff will implement district-name changes: Flexible Neighborhood to General Neighborhood, Garden Community to Apartment Community, removal of higher density from the Attached Community intent statement, and review of intent statements. - Staff will evaluate increasing the 2-foot, 8-inch architectural projection allowance to 3 feet or 3 feet, 4 inches and will consult Building Inspections staff. - Staff will evaluate the potential use of a median rather than an average for setback reductions. - No work session will be held in October; at least two public open houses are planned for late October, followed by a public comment period, after which the Commission will reconvene for another work session. - Staff will prepare presentations for the Planning Commission in 2027 using a list of city departments and related organizations submitted by a commissioner. - The meeting adjourned at 8:12 p.m.

This meeting of the Joint Utility, Cable, Telecommunications and Technology, Governmental Affairs and Budget Committee took place on September 22, 2026. The committee considered board appointments, a budget presentation, and three utility-related resolutions. Board and Commission Appointments - The committee approved Jacques Detiege to the Civil Service Commission (7-0). The agenda also listed Nick L. Harris for the same commission, but his appearance and vote were not recorded in the transcript. - The committee approved Travis Phipps to the New Orleans Redevelopment Authority (NORA) with 7 votes in favor. Public Comments & Testimony - Jesse George, on behalf of the Alliance for Affordable Energy, commented on the resolution to extend the Formula Rate Plan (FRP). He expressed support for an extension but urged cutting it from four years to two, arguing that a four-year extension would mean over a decade without a full rate case examination and would defer regulatory decisions to the next council. He also called for conditions requiring Entergy to report on disconnections and arrearages. He criticized the resolution for lacking such conditions, stating it showed a lack of concern for constituents struggling with energy bills. - A resident, Ms. Pellerin (819 Orleans Avenue), commented on the FERC opinion resolution. She questioned why ratepayers should bear the cost of Entergy's obligations to sister companies, and asked whether the city is fighting the FERC decision. Council members explained that they are bound by FERC rulings and have legal representation at FERC but lost the case. Discussion Items - CAO/Finance Budget Presentation: The city's financial position through July 31, 2026 (60% of fiscal year) was presented. Revenues: $513 million collected, $44 million above year-to-date forecast. Expenditures: $424 million (53% of budget). General fund surplus of $89.5 million year-to-date. Property taxes slightly down, sales tax slightly down, service charges down, licenses and permits up. Overtime spending monitored. Vacancies increased 5% from prior month. Total unrestricted fund balance $262.6 million. Councilmembers questioned about amnesty program (starting October 1) and progress on auctioning adjudicated properties. The director reported a contractor selected for auctions but no firm timeline; Councilmember Hughes urged attention to elderly residents needing assistance with online bidding. - Resolution – Formula Rate Plan Extension (Item 4): Resolution to extend the electric formula rate plan rider for four additional years. After public comment, the committee passed the resolution with 5 yes votes (no nays). - Resolution – FERC Order Regulatory Liability (Item 5): Resolution to establish a regulatory account of $10 million in response to FERC Opinion No. 595, which indicated Entergy New Orleans owes about $18 million to other entities. The account mitigates bill impact from a negative final decision. Staff explained the council is bound by FERC and has legal representation. The resolution passed 6-0. - Resolution – Hurricane Francine Storm Cost Certification (Item 6): Resolution certifying that Entergy New Orleans' costs in response to Hurricane Francine were proper, concluding docket UD-25-02. Passed 5-0. Key Outcomes - Appointments: Jacques Detiege to Civil Service Commission (approved 7-0). Travis Phipps to NORA (approved 7-0). - Resolution extending the electric formula rate plan rider for four years passed (5-0). - Resolution establishing a regulatory liability account for FERC Opinion No. 595 passed (6-0). - Resolution certifying Hurricane Francine costs passed (5-0).

The Jersey City Municipal Council held a caucus meeting on September 22, 2026, from 4:03 PM to 6:55 PM. All nine council members were present. The meeting focused on financial corrective actions, CDBG fund allocation, public safety grants, infrastructure projects, tax abatement updates, and a major development PILOT. No public comments were heard; a public hearing with 32 registered speakers is scheduled for the following council meeting. Consent Calendar - Resolution 26-580: Annual audit compliance certification. - Resolution 26-584: Designating September as Nepal Heritage Month. - Resolution 26-585: Supporting World Migratory Bird Day and application to become New Jersey's first official bird city. - Resolution 26-587: Supporting the Better Light Rail campaign in Hudson County. - Resolution 26-588: Accepting a gift of customer service best practices training from Expedient Staffing Solutions. - Resolution 26-589: Authorizing payment to Baseline Tennis for construction services. - Resolution 26-597: Authorizing liens for litter removal costs. - Resolution 26-598: Amending a grant for Project Safe Neighborhoods (reduced from $279,004 to $223,590). - Resolution 26-600: Body armor replacement grant. - Resolution 26-601: Extending contract with Watch Us Grow for CDBG tree planting. - Resolution 26-602: No-cost time extension for Endpoint Environmental at PPG remediation site. - Resolution 26-604/605: Leases with PSE&G and Verizon for utility poles to support camera installation. - Resolutions 26-606/608: Extending grant and awarding design contract for Caven Point and Pacific Avenue reconstruction. - Resolutions 26-603/607: Extending grant and awarding design contract for Monticello Avenue reconstruction. - Resolution 26-609: No-cost time extension for Montgomery Street design. - Resolution 26-610: Jurisdictional agreement with NJDOT for road maintenance near Route 139. - Resolution 26-611: Authorizing NJCU redevelopment plan amendment (ShopRite parcel). - Resolution 26-612: Second amendment to license agreement with NJ Transit and Grand LH N 1 Urban Renewal LLC. - Resolution 26-613: Closed session authorization for pending litigation on October 7, 2026. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were made during the caucus. A public hearing with 32 speakers is scheduled for the regular council meeting on September 23, 2026. Discussion Items 1. Finance Department – Corrective Action Plan (Resolution 26-581) - Director Bill presented the corrective action plan for FY2025, containing 17 findings (two material weaknesses). Most are repeat findings, some dating to 2014. A fixed asset inventory RFP is pending with responses due early October. Monthly reconciliations are underway with outside consultants. An overpayment to the IRS ($? not specified) will require a 2027 budget appropriation. A HUD OIG dispute of $11.5 million remains unresolved; the city disputes the amount. Councilman Griffin questioned benchmarks and timelines; Director Bill committed to completing most corrections by end of 2026, with three items rolling into 2027. 2. Finance Department – Professional Services Contract Amendment (Resolution 26-583) - Director Bill requested a $50,000 increase (to $157,000) for Wildcotts & Company LLC to assist with audits, accumulated absences, and monthly reconciliations. Council members expressed desire to eventually bring annual financial statement work in-house. 3. Community Development – CDBG Fund Allocation and 128 Glenwood Avenue (Resolutions 26-590 to 26-594, and Ordinance 4.10) - Director Diaz presented mortgage discharges and a resolution for a $1 million CDBG-funded acquisition of 128 Glenwood Avenue for a community park. The city faces a HUD timeliness test in January 2027; failure for a fourth year would result in a 50% funding cut. Director Diaz stated the acquisition is the only project ready to meet the deadline. Councilman Griffin and Councilman Lavaro raised concerns about process, lack of alternatives, and potential to use funds for street paving or other projects. The administration argued other projects cannot be completed in time. Councilman Singh asked about exploring an extension from HUD; the Business Administrator agreed to inquire. The resolution and related ordinance will be voted on after public comments at the regular meeting. 4. Grants Department – Cancellation of Old Grant Balances (Resolution 26-582) - Director Webb presented cancellation of 12 grants totaling $1.7 million, some predating the current financial system. The cancellations are accounting adjustments—funds were already spent from other sources. This was a corrective action finding from the audit. 5. Public Safety – Training Grants and Body Armor (Resolutions 26-595, 26-596, 26-598, 26-600) - Elise Gibbs presented four grants: $350,000 from COPS for de-escalation and crisis intervention training; $700,000 from BJA for broader wellness and resilience training; body armor replacement ($? not specified); and amendment to Project Safe Neighborhoods grant (reduced amount). All grants have no match requirement. Councilwoman Singh asked about training details and officer wellness; Ms. Gibbs noted a wellness center is planned. 6. Fire Department – Bond Ordinance Reappropriation (Ordinance 26-076) - Deputy Director Hart presented a second-reading bond ordinance reappropriating $2.6 million for self-contained breathing apparatus and the fire training tower. Funds come from ordinance 21-040. 7. Infrastructure – Parking and Street Reconstruction (Ordinances 26-073, 26-074, 26-075, 26-078; Resolutions 26-603/607, 26-606/608) - Drew from Engineering presented several ordinances to update parking regulations (Bergen Avenue, Clifton Place, Culver Avenue) and reserve parking for disabled. Two major street reconstruction projects were discussed: Caven Point/Pacific Avenue ($? grant-funded) and Monticello Avenue ($1.8 million state grant, total estimated $3.8 million). Both will include hardened bike lanes, ADA ramps, and streetscape improvements. Council members supported the projects and discussed capital staffing. 8. Tax Assessor – Five-Year Tax Abatement Program Update (Ordinance 26-080) - Director Laura presented a first-reading ordinance to readopt and modify the five-year tax abatement program expiring December 31, 2025. Key changes: owner occupancy requirement for 1-4 family homes and condos; increased council approval threshold from $200,000 to $300,000 in annual taxes; and clear counting of ADUs as units. Council members questioned enforcement and impact on tax revenue. The ordinance will be introduced at the regular meeting. 9. Planning – Redevelopment Plan Amendment for Warren & Morgan (Ordinance 26-079) - Matt Ward presented a first-reading ordinance for a redevelopment plan at Warren and Morgan streets. Councilwoman Little proposed adding a two-tier option: up to 20 stories with 15% affordable, or up to 27 stories with 20% affordable. The developer has committed to in-perpetuity nonprofit arts space and traffic safety improvements. The ordinance can be amended before introduction without a new first reading, per Corporation Counsel. Council members expressed support for the tiered approach. 10. Canal Crossing PILOT (Second Reading Ordinances 4.1-4.3) - Extensive discussion on the Canal Crossing project's PILOT agreement. Financial advisor Tom Banker stated the project would not be built without the abatement and ASPIRE credits. He projected annual costs to the municipal levy of $22,741 and school levy of $801,345, but noted the county side costs are de minimis due to equalization. The current vacant lot generates $230,586 in taxes annually; the project under PILOT would generate $3,077,194 on average over 30 years. Councilman Lavaro asked about higher affordability in future phases; Deputy Mayor Potter confirmed the developer committed to revisit affordability. The council will vote at the regular meeting. Key Outcomes - The council will vote on all discussed items at the September 23, 2026 regular meeting, after public comments. - The administration will explore a HUD extension for CDBG funds and provide a list of other potential projects. - The Warren & Morgan ordinance will be amended to include the two-tier affordability option prior to the vote. - Financial documents for Canal Crossing will be circulated to all council members. - A late item resolution appointing Darrell Laval to the ABC board is expected to be added to the agenda.

The Sarasota City Commission convened a special meeting at approximately 1:30 PM on September 22, 2026, to discuss settlement negotiations and strategy in the lawsuit Frederick Reigle v. City of Sarasota and Sarasota County (Case No. 2025 CA 001074 NC). The meeting consisted of an invocation, pledge of allegiance, and a closed attorney-client session. No public comments were received. After the closed session, the Commission reconvened in open session and took action on the case. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public spoke during the Citizens Input portion of the meeting; the Mayor moved directly to the agenda item. Closed Attorney Client Session - The Commission recessed at 1:34 PM into a closed session in Room 109 to discuss settlement negotiations and strategy. Upon reconvening at 1:57 PM, City Attorney Polsack stated that no votes were taken during the closed portion. Key Outcomes - A motion was made and seconded to approve the settlement in the case of Frederick Reigle v. City of Sarasota and Sarasota County, Case No. 2025 CA 001074 NC, in exchange for a fully executed release. The motion was corrected to reflect the correct plaintiff name (Frederick Reigle) and passed unanimously by the Commission.

The Powell Development Corporation (PDC) convened on September 22, 2026, at 12:11 p.m. (11 minutes after the scheduled start) in Council Chambers under Chairman Steve Flaherty. The board approved a key women in business sponsorship, authorized a tech-flex land option on Home Road, and received reports on economic development, city projects, and the Olentangy school district. Consent Calendar - The board unanimously approved the minutes from both the regular Powell Development Corporation meeting and the Planning Retreat meeting held on August 25, 2026. Discussion Items - Treasurer's Report & Budget Adjustment: Assistant Finance Director Tina Birch reported $152,413 in revenue for August and $7,748 in expenses, noting higher-than-anticipated charging station utility costs. Finance Director Samantha Borchers confirmed that while monthly EV charger revenue averages $1,500, it does not fully offset costs. The board approved a $10,500 increase for the charging station utility line item (Y-6, N-0). - Powell Women in Business Luncheon Sponsorship: Gretchen Bonasera and Nicole Klatte requested a Gold Connector Tier ($2,500) sponsorship, advocating for the program's community value. Administrator Sean Hughes expressed support for the marketing value of a higher presenting sponsorship. The board approved a $5,000 Presenting Sponsorship specifically including Scholarship Sponsor benefits to send six Olentangy School District students. The substantive motion passed 5-0-1 (Mayor Karr abstaining due to her role as a panelist). - Home Road 10-Acre Option Agreement: Administrator Sean Hughes detailed the proposed option agreement with Exxcel Project Management for the PDC's 10.68 acres on Home Road. The plan involves a tech-flex development potentially anchored by a tech company seeking a 135,000 sq. ft. headquarters with R&D and education facilities. The projected Annualized Return on Investment is 5.37% per year over 15 years (118.02% total). Ryan Jenkins stated he had no conflict of interest on this matter and noted the development's alignment with school district interests. The board unanimously authorized the Chairman to finalize and execute the agreement (Y-6, N-0). - Economic Development Report: Administrator Sean Hughes reported 41 new businesses/startups creating 816 FTEs, $65.34 million in new payroll, and an estimated $1.3 million in new annual income tax revenue. Megan Canavan questioned how the city markets these successes to counteract negative narratives about business struggles. The discussion expanded to include strategic annexation to capture income tax from commercial areas along Sawmill Parkway. - City Council and Manager Reports: Mayor Heather Karr updated the board on the 2026 Street Maintenance Program, the Bennett Farms pathway grant, a temporary marijuana moratorium, and a new public parking agreement. City Manager Andrew White confirmed the failure of the referendum petition against the city's new zoning code, leaving the code in effect. - Committee Reports: Ryan Jenkins reported on Olentangy School District construction progress and its 5-star state report card. Steve Flaherty updated the board on the OWU Entrepreneurial Centre's new leadership. Megan Canavan reported the Downtown Merchants Committee is promoting downtown parking and valet services. Key Outcomes - Budget Increase: Approved a $10,500 increase for charging station utility costs (Y-6, N-0). - WIB Sponsorship: Approved $5,000 for a Presenting Sponsor with Scholarship benefits (Y-5, N-0, AB-1). - Home Road Land Option: Authorized the Chairman to execute the option agreement with Exxcel Project Management for the 10.68-acre Home Road property (Y-6, N-0). - Zoning Code Upheld: Confirmed the failure of the referendum petition, keeping the new zoning code in effect.

The Common Council of New Berlin met on September 22, 2026, at 6:33 PM in the City Hall Council Chambers, with Mayor Dave Ament presiding. Six of seven alderpersons were present. Public Comments & Testimony - Privilege of the Floor: Following the roll call, five members of the public addressed the Common Council on various unspecified matters. Each speaker was limited to three minutes. Reports and Official Business - City Clerk: Announced that absentee ballots for the November 3, 2026, General Election have been mailed to voters with valid requests on file. Residents were directed to the MyVote Wisconsin website to request a ballot. - Prior Minutes: The Council unanimously approved the minutes from the August 25, 2026, Common Council meeting (6-0). - Appointments: The Council unanimously approved the Mayoral Appointments as presented (6-0). Consent Calendar The Council unanimously approved the Consent Agenda (6-0). These items had previously passed the Committee of the Whole without objection: - Committee of the Whole Minutes: Approved the August 25, 2026, meeting minutes. - Utility & Finance Claims: Approved claims of $16,269.21 (Water Utility), $98,272.42 (Sewer Utility), and $534,530.28 (General City). - Alcohol License: Approved a "Class B" alcohol license for Sang Enterprises LLC, d/b/a The Range Haus, located at 20101 W Cleveland Ave. - Donation Agreement: Approved the Badura donation agreement (tabled from the August 25 COW meeting). - Budget Amendment: Approved Resolution No. 2026-19, transferring $90,000 in residual capital project funds to the Library Elevator Rehabilitation capital account. - Information Technology: Received the IT Department update. - Solid Waste Collection: Approved the agenda item regarding curbside collection, covering the renewal of the contract with John's Disposal Service, Inc., an RFP process, or changes to services. Discussion Items - Closed Session: The only discussion item requiring substantive deliberation was the Police and Fire Contract Negotiations, which was conducted entirely in closed session. Key Outcomes - Voting Record: All votes taken during the open portion of the meeting were unanimous (6-0). - Closed Session: The Council convened into closed session at 6:36 PM pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 19.85(1)(e) for the purpose of negotiating Police and Fire contracts. The Council reconvened into open session at 7:21 PM and immediately adjourned. - Transcription Note: The raw audio transcript provided for this meeting consisted entirely of garbled placeholder text ("La vabia, la sub") and does not match the official meeting minutes or agenda. This summary is based on the official record.