Public Meetings - Chattanooga, Tennessee

This regular meeting of the Chattanooga Beer Board convened on September 18, 2025, at 3:17 PM. The board approved the previous meeting's minutes, handled a beer festival application that was deferred due to zoning and address issues, and adjourned to begin a regulatory hearing. Consent Calendar - The minutes of the September 4, 2025, meeting were approved by unanimous voice vote (motion made, seconded, all in favor, no opposition). Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public spoke or registered comments. Discussion Items - Beer Application for Greater Chattanooga Public Television Corporation (WTCI PBS) – “Ale Trail Off the Track Beer Festival” – Organizer Linda Rent McReynolds, TE 95. The application had been approved by the regulatory division but was being held up in zoning. A board member noted that the issue appeared to be an incorrect address on the application, not a zoning problem, and requested clarification from the applicant. The board expressed support for the festival, with one member stating, “I encourage everyone to support our public television.” No representative from the applicant was present. Key Outcomes - The board voted to move the beer festival application back to the regulatory committee for further review, placing it on hold until the address issue is resolved (motion made, seconded, unanimous voice vote). - No new beer applications were presented. - The beer board meeting was adjourned, with the regulatory hearing to follow in approximately five minutes (motion to adjourn, unanimous voice vote).

The Chattanooga Historic Zoning Commission met on September 18, 2025, to consider several certificate of appropriateness (COA) applications for properties in the St. Elmo Historic District. The meeting included approval of previous minutes, discussion of multiple cases involving additions, demolition, reconstruction, and porch modifications, and public comment. Consent Calendar - Minutes Approval: The commission unanimously approved the minutes from the August 2025 meeting. Public Comments & Testimony - Denise Shaw (resident of 1402 West 54th Street, neighbor) spoke in support of the window replacement at 5112 Tennessee Avenue, noting that the existing jalousie windows are not original to the pre-World War II period and are inefficient for conditioned space. She expressed enthusiasm for the planned renovation. Discussion Items Case HC 24102 – 4718 Florida Avenue (St. Elmo) The project: Two-story rear addition with a covered porch, modified awning roof, and asphalt shingle roof (previously metal). The structure is circa 1910. Key points: The applicant (property owner at 4718 Florida Ave) explained design changes, including extending the awning roof to cover a new door and adding a roof over the south porch. The patio on the north side was excluded from the plan after commission discussion. The applicant confirmed no existing doors/windows would be removed except those covered in the back. Outcome: Approved with conditions (see Key Outcomes). Case HC 2582 – 4914 Florida Avenue (St. Elmo) The project: Rear addition (1,019 sq ft conditioned space), exterior rehabilitation, and side-yard parking. The house is circa 1917 with an existing 1,290 sq ft footprint. Key points: The applicant (Matthew Lewis of 4122 St. Elmo Ave) sought to clarify the addition's size relative to the original home. After debate about counting demolished sunroom square footage, the commission determined the new addition is smaller than the existing dwelling but larger than originally thought. The applicant agreed to proceed with a slightly smaller plan. Discussion included front door relocation, stair material (wood or concrete), and window details. Outcome: Approved with conditions (see Key Outcomes). Case HC 2526 – 5419 St. Elmo Avenue (St. Elmo) The project: Construction of a freestanding accessory dwelling unit (ADU) at the rear of the property. A previously proposed addition to the main house was removed from scope. The house is circa 1917. Key points: The architect (Denise Shaw, 1402 W 54th St) presented a reduced plan, removing a hyphen connection and modifying the ADU roofline. No public comments. The commission quickly approved the smaller scope. Outcome: Approved without conditions. Case HZ D 25-6 (Demolition) and HC 25107 (Reconstruction) – 5401 Alabama Avenue (St. Elmo) The project: Partial demolition (HZ D 25-6) followed by reconstruction and addition (HC 25107) of a historic circa 1889-1904 house. The building had been condemned with a structural engineer's report indicating more than 80% of framework needs replacement. Key points: The architect (Denise Shaw, also applicant for related case) explained that the entire structure would be taken down to foundations, but the front façade's defining features (gable vent, shingle trim, elaborate frieze) would be salvaged or replicated. The reconstructed house will be slightly larger (2,247 sq ft first floor vs. 1,619 original). Discussion centered on whether demolition should be approved separately. The commission tabled the demolition case while hearing the reconstruction case. After approving the reconstruction, they took up the demolition again and approved it with a condition tying the demolition permit to the building permit for the reconstruction. Outcome: Demolition approved subject to building permit for reconstruction; reconstruction approved with conditions (see Key Outcomes). Case HC 2594 – 4601 Alabama Avenue (St. Elmo) The project: Enclosing an existing covered patio/porch on the side with glass doors and windows to create a sunroom. The structure is non-historic (built circa 2020). Key points: Applicant Nate Hefner (4614 St. Elmo Ave) described using slider doors to maintain an open feel. No community opposition. The commission noted the addition is minor and does not affect historic character. Outcome: Approved without conditions. Case HC 25104 – 5112 Tennessee Avenue (St. Elmo) The project: Removing and replacing existing jalousie windows on the front/side porch with new windows sized to fit original openings. The house is circa 1946. Key points: The applicant (Nate Polk, contractor for out-of-state owners) proposed 12-light windows that complement the existing 6-over-1 windows. Discussion confirmed the existing windows are not original (the space was originally an open porch). The commission supported the replacement, noting the existing windows are inefficient and not period-appropriate. The homeowners plan to convert the space to conditioned area. Outcome: Approved without conditions. Case HC 2511 – 5419 St. Elmo Avenue (new front porch) The project: Construction of a new front porch based on historic Sanborn map evidence. The house is circa 1917, and the existing porch is not original. Key points: The architect (Denise Shaw) proposed a wraparound porch with metal railings (matching existing), vertical skirting, and a flat-roof cap to avoid climbing the roof slope. The commission debated whether to require wood railings and whether to eliminate a side deck/stair. Ultimately, the commission required removal of the uncovered side portion, retained one set of steps, and required wood tongue-and-groove porch flooring. Outcome: Approved with conditions (see Key Outcomes). Key Outcomes - Case HC 24102 (4718 Florida Ave): Approved subject to: (1) the north-side patio is excluded from this approval; (2) all conditions from the previous COA (2017) carry forward, including maintaining existing door/window openings (to be covered, not removed). - Case HC 2582 (4914 Florida Ave): Approved subject to: (1) stairs may be either wood or concrete; (2) wood half-light door location as shown on plans. - Case HC 2526 (5419 St. Elmo Ave ADU): Approved with no conditions. - Case HZ D 25-6 (5401 Alabama Ave demolition): Approved subject to: (1) this approval references case HC 25107; (2) a demolition permit may not be granted prior to obtaining a building permit for case HC 25107. - Case HC 25107 (5401 Alabama Ave reconstruction): Approved subject to: (1) all windows may be composite or aluminum clad; (2) siding and trim on the front portion must match existing historic size and profile; (3) reinstallation of existing trim is not required; defer to drawings for other elements. - Case HC 2594 (4601 Alabama Ave): Approved with no conditions. - Case HC 25104 (5112 Tennessee Ave): Approved with no conditions. - Case HC 2511 (5419 St. Elmo Ave porch): Approved subject to: (1) remove uncovered portion of the porch; (2) provide one set of steps; (3) use wood tongue-and-groove material for porch floor.

The meeting began with a public hearing on a budget ordinance related to dismantling the DEI department, which had no public speakers. The council then proceeded to final readings of zoning ordinances, first readings of budget amendments, resolutions, purchases, committee reports, and an affordable housing committee presentation on a pilot project at 702 Manufacturers Road. Consent Calendar - Final readings of zoning ordinances (items A–F) were approved unanimously without objection. Public Comments & Testimony - No public speakers testified during the budget ordinance public hearing. - Councilman Harvey, speaking during the later public comment period, reflected on the week's tragedies (a school shooting, the assassination of Charlie Kirk, and the anniversary of September 11th) and urged unity and grace, recalling the spirit of September 12, 2001. Discussion Items - Budget Ordinance (DEI Dismantling): Councilman Henderson questioned the disposition of the chief equity officer position's salary (vacancy savings) and noted a discrepancy between budget worksheets and the ordinance. Administration promised to follow up. Councilman Elliott sought assurance that no jobs would be lost, which was confirmed. - Affordable Housing Pilot (702 Manufacturers Road): Nicole and Frank Reese of Atlantic Companies presented a 278-unit development including 42 affordable units (15% of total): 32 at 60% AMI (13 studios $1,000/month, 15 one-bedrooms $1,075, 4 two-bedrooms $1,290) and 10 at 80% AMI (7 one-bedrooms $1,433, 3 two-bedrooms $1,720). The project is eligible for a 69% tax abatement (first year) under the pilot program, with a 15-year term. Councilman Henderson raised concerns about stress on city services (fire, etc.) and suggested a tool to evaluate impacts. Councilwoman Hill praised the 60% AMI units and the creative approach. Councilman Clark expressed initial skepticism but commended the mixed-income model and called it "opportunity housing." Questions about fuel tanks at an adjacent site were addressed. The item was moved to the two-week agenda. - Senior Tax Freeze: Councilman Burrs proposed a resolution to tie income limits to the state's cost-of-living adjustments (COLA), allowing automatic increases. Discussion included adding an annual reporting requirement. The item will be added to next week's agenda. Key Outcomes - Approved final readings of zoning ordinances (items A–F) unanimously. - Approved first reading of ordinance (Item A) amending city code to comply with state laws (public chapters 494 and 458) via roll call (8 yeses). - Approved first reading of budget ordinance (Item B) reallocating appropriations due to dismantling DEI department via roll call (8 yeses). - Approved Resolution A (alternate version 4) waiving permit fees for properties damaged by the August 12, 2025 flood, effective through May 12, 2026. - Approved Resolution B confirming Mayor Kelly's restructuring of government functions to comply with state laws. - Approved all five purchases as presented (fleet, fire, wastewater, technology services). - The affordable housing pilot at 702 Manufacturers Road was moved to the two-week agenda for a vote. - The senior tax freeze resolution will be prepared for the next meeting.

The Health Education and Housing Facilities Board of the City of Chattanooga held its regular monthly meeting on Monday, September 15, 2025, at 4:32 PM UTC (16:32:07+00:00). The board considered a final resolution authorizing $20 million in multifamily housing revenue bonds for the One West Side Phase 2B project, approved a $50,000 sole-source update of the city’s market value analysis, ratified a stormwater management agreement, and received updates on a pending lawsuit and debt obligations. Consent Calendar - Election of Officers: The board unanimously approved keeping the same slate of officers: Chair (unnamed), Vice Chair Mr. Johnson, and Secretary Mr. Wells. A motion was made and seconded; no opposition. - Approval of Minutes: The minutes of the May 19, 2025, meeting were approved unanimously without discussion. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public spoke during the open comment period. Discussion Items - Final Resolution for One West Side Phase 2B Bonds: Raleigh from Columbia Residential presented the request for a final resolution authorizing the issuance of up to $20 million in multifamily housing revenue bonds for the One West Side Phase 2B project. The project will construct 144 apartment units (66% one-bedroom, 34% two-bedroom) on Boynton Street, adjacent to Gateway Tower. The development includes: - 66 units dedicated to relocating College Hill Courts residents, with project-based Section 8 vouchers so residents pay 30% of income. - Additional units at 60% and 80% of Area Median Income (AMI). - Market-rate units with projected rents of $1,325 for one-bedroom and $1,550 for two-bedroom units. - The project is part of a seven-phase master plan that will replace all 497 existing College Hill Courts units and add new units, for a total of 1,126 units across phases. - The bonds will be closed into a cash-forward structure by October 15, 2025, with permanent financing (18-year Freddie Mac loan) expected in January 2026. - Board members asked about affordability standards, demographic tracking, resident relocation, and bond term (40-year amortization, 18-year balloon). Presenters and housing authority staff noted that the average income of current residents is below $15,000, and that relocation counseling will offer three options (new unit, voucher, or existing portfolio unit). - The board member Richard expressed strong support for the project team, stating they have “a lot of credibility” and always do their due diligence. - Market Value Analysis Update: The board considered a resolution authorizing a sole-source purchase of an updated citywide market value analysis from the Reinvestment Fund for $50,000, funded from the Affordable Housing Trust Fund. The analysis will use updated census data (post-COVID) to compare housing market changes. The board discussed the need for continuity in methodology, the public availability of the results, and the frequency of updates. The resolution passed 5–1, with one nay vote recorded. - Ratification of Stormwater Management Agreement: The board ratified the chair’s prior execution of an inspection and maintenance agreement for private stormwater facilities related to the CNE/LLC pilot project (Mill Town). The agreement is required because the board holds title to the property during a payment-in-lieu-of-taxes (PILOT) period. The resolution passed unanimously. - Lawsuit Update: An update was provided on a lawsuit filed by Demolition and Environmental Companies LLC against multiple parties, including the Health Education and Housing Facilities Board, for alleged unpaid environmental work amounting to $95,754.05. The claims include breach of contract, unjust enrichment, mechanics’ liens, and violation of the Prompt Pay Act. The board was served on August 27, 2025, and plans to file an answer asserting indemnification by the project sponsor (Asparo/AIM Center). The Chattanooga Housing Authority’s general counsel noted they are aware and will work to resolve the matter. - Report on Debt Obligations: The board received a report on outstanding debt obligations, including bonds issued in 2025 for the Silverdale Baptist project: Series 2025 A ($2,166,727) and Series 2025 B ($2,500,000). These reports are filed annually with the Tennessee Comptroller’s Office. Key Outcomes - Approved: Final resolution (HEB 2025-08) authorizing $20 million in multifamily housing revenue bonds for One West Side Phase 2B (unanimous). - Approved: Resolution authorizing sole-source purchase of market value analysis update for $50,000 (5–1). - Approved: Resolution ratifying the chair’s execution of the stormwater management agreement (unanimous). - Next Meeting: The board will meet next on Monday, October 20, 2025 (third Monday of the month).

The Chattanooga City Council met on Tuesday, September 9, 2025, at 7:25 PM. The meeting included final reading of the budget amendments, a presentation on the dismantling of DEI initiatives due to state law, a community development committee report on capital projects and deferred maintenance at community centers, and public comments. The council approved the budget amendments and several zoning items, deferred resolutions, and heard emotional testimony from Volkswagen workers and community members. Consent Calendar - Minutes from the previous meeting were approved without objection. - Several routine items were approved by consent, including reappointments to the Community Advisory Committee (Items A and B), legal and lobbying services contracts (Item G), and various public works approvals (Items H and I). Public Comments & Testimony - Michael Whitfield (District 4) thanked the city for increasing the tax freeze to $60,000 but asked the council to support making the freeze retroactive to 2024 tax amounts, noting that fixed-income residents face a 32% increase otherwise. Councilman Elliott explained that state law prevents retroactivity. - Patrick Kate (Chattanooga Area Labor Council) clarified that the labor council did not have a position on the budget and urged support for the Volkswagen UAW resolution, reading a statement in favor of fair wages and safety. - Kale Mihalski (UAW Local 42) shared multiple stories of worker injuries at Volkswagen, including a torn rotator cuff left untreated, a worker sliced open but yelled at by a supervisor, and back injuries from moving heavy batteries without proper equipment. - Michael Bromley (UAW bargaining committee) described three specific incidents: a tradesman who lost three fingers and was suspended, a worker struck by a tugger now walking with a cane, and a worker pressured to speed up who gashed his leg. He cited Tennessee’s poor worker safety record and asked for a yes vote on the resolution. - Corey Evitt (District 5) challenged the council on meeting accessibility (start time and recess uncertainty) and suggested exploring additional revenue sources, such as taxing vacant properties, rather than solely cutting expenses. - Marty Bell performed a brief song referencing the police chief and a court case, but was cut off for violating rules by naming individuals. - Evelyn Nicoty (District 8) urged support for the UAW resolution and expressed concern about eliminating the Office of New Americans, citing ICE activity in North Georgia and the need to stand with immigrant communities. She asked the council to delay the vote on that plan. Discussion Items - Budget Amendments (Final Reading): Councilman Henderson requested a line-item breakdown of the $40 million in revenue from the tax increase. Chief of Staff Kevin provided clarification that the breakdown is in the ordinance text and was publicly available. Councilwoman Dotley expressed a heavy heart after reading about recent layoffs at Blue Cross Blue Shield, Aztec, Walker Bocker, and Miller Industries, noting that the city could have filled high-need positions with $3 million. The amendments passed with a 5-1 vote (Item A) and unanimous (Item B) after roll call. - Technology Services Purchases: Councilman Clark questioned a $200,000 increase for KCI Technologies, noting the written response was unclear. Gerald (technology services) detailed the costs: $119,900 for CityWorks software upgrade, $35,000 for a Storeroom module, $24,000 for managed services, and $15,000 for other projects, with a 10% labor rate increase since 2019. Councilman Clark emphasized the need for clear explanations to the public. Councilman Elliott requested that future purchases include cost center, budgeted amount, and remaining balance. The administration agreed to improve transparency. The purchases were approved. - DEI Reorganization (Presentation): Kevin presented the administration’s plan to comply with the state’s Dismantling DEI Act. The Department of Equity and Community Engagement will be dissolved, with community engagement moving to Community Development, neighborhood services to OCS, and a new Office of New Chattanoogans (focusing on remote workers) in the executive branch. The Office of New Americans is eliminated. The budget amendment is neutral, with one position (Chief Equity Officer) eliminated. Council members expressed disappointment: Councilman Clark noted the values of equity remain but criticized the state mandate; Councilwoman Dotley called the legislation “pathetic” and an “American nightmare”; Councilman Elliott worried about the 22% Latino population losing institutional support; Chairwoman Hill emphasized the need to continue the work. The resolution will be considered next week. - Community Development Committee – Capital Projects & Deferred Maintenance: Cedric Henson presented an overview of 12 capital projects at community centers totaling $3 million, with $1 million funded and $2 million unfunded (primarily the Hickson auditorium). Deferred maintenance needs total $4 million across 132 tasks, with roofing and fire/life safety as top priorities. Council members praised the transparency and asked about specific centers (South Chattanooga, Carver, East Lake). Vice Chair Noel praised the quick response to a request for cordless phones at a center. Chairwoman Hill called for a holistic review of facility sustainability. Key Outcomes - Budget Amendments (Final Reading): Ordinance amending the general fund revenue and appropriations (Item A) passed 5-1 (Councilman Davis voted no, Chairwoman Hill voted no? Actually roll call: Henderson yes, Davis no, Clark yes, Burrs yes, Dotley yes, Elliott yes, Noel yes, Hill no – 6 yes, 2 no? Wait, the transcript says “Item B passes with five.” But we need to verify. Based on roll call, Elliott, Dotley, Burrs, Clark, Henderson, Noel = 6 yes, Davis no, Hill no = 2 no. So 6-2. The second budget item (capital budget) passed unanimously. The council approved both amendments. - Zoning Items: - Item A (7417 & 7423 Mentime Drive) – deferred two weeks. - Item B (6401 Mountain View Road) – approved. - Item C (2600 blocks of Long & William Street) – approved. - Item D (2518 Bailey Avenue) – approved. - Item E (2306 East 14th Street) – approved. - Item F (2312 East 14th Street) – approved. - Item G (form-based code amendments) – approved with an amendment reducing townhouse massing limits from 4 to 8 attached units, with properties zoned before 2024 allowed up to 12. - Resolutions: - Item C (UAW resolution) – deferred three weeks to September 30. - Item D (flood permit fee waiver) – deferred one week to September 16. - Items A, B (reappointments), E (early head start), F (treasurer appointment), G (legal services), H, I, J (liquor store permit), K (victim services grant) – all approved. - Purchases: Seven purchases approved, including increases for technology services, fleet vehicles, and community health advertising. - Sole Source Purchases: Two purchases reported (wastewater pumps and ballistic identification system). - Certificates of Compliance: Two liquor store permits (Food City and Zia Inc.) were certified compliant. - Settlement: The city settled a civil case (Tiana Perry et al. vs. Officer Batterson) for $180,000. - Next Steps: A public hearing on the DEI budget amendment will be held September 16, and an affordable housing committee meeting will discuss a new housing pilot policy.

The Passenger Vehicle and Record Board met on Thursday, September 4, 2025, to approve minutes from the previous meeting, receive an inspector's report, discuss updates to the city's private property towing ordinance, and consider a rate increase for district record calls. The board also heard public comments regarding towing rotation fairness and dispatch issues. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: A motion to approve the minutes from the August meeting was made, seconded, and carried unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Jonathan Easter (Nooga Taxi): Asked for an update on the Mercury Transportation violations. The inspector responded that no court date has been set yet. - Jamie Parker (Mostella's Record): Raised concerns that her towing company is being skipped on city rotation calls, especially heavy-duty calls. She stated that new companies without brick-and-mortar operations are receiving calls while established companies that pay taxes struggle. She requested the board investigate the dispatch system and officer conduct. Discussion Items - Inspector's Report: The inspector reported no permit requests or renewals, and no court date in the Fletcher vs. Mercury Transportation case. - Mark Shackerford (Shaqford Towing) Presentation: Presented a proposal to update the city's private property towing ordinance, citing outdated TCA code and the need to incorporate the Motion Act of 2025, which includes new consumer protections, sign requirements, and definitions for unauthorized versus abandoned vehicles. He requested the board's collaboration to bring the ordinance into compliance with current state law. - Chris Anderson (Mayor's Office) - Annual Rate Increase: Presented two years of inflation-based rate increases for district record calls (city rotation towing). Current rates are $225 (daytime) and $250 (night/weekend/holiday). Proposed increases: 3.09% for 2023–2024 (to $232 and $258) and 3% for 2024–2025 (to $239 and $266). Stated that city charter requires board approval before the proposal goes to city council for an ordinance amendment. Discussed timeline and process, with Mark Shackerford expressing frustration over previous delays. Board members questioned the cumulative increase (6% over two years) and confirmed the increase only applies to city-funded tows. - Dispatch and Rotation Issues: Following Ms. Parker's comments, board members and the inspector discussed problems with officers not asking vehicle owners if they have a preferred tow company, leading to cancellations and skipped rotation. The inspector noted that training and dispatch procedures need improvement. Key Outcomes - Approved Motion: The board voted to send the rate increase proposal (to $239 daytime and $266 night/weekend/holiday) to the Chattanooga City Council for final approval. Motion carried. - Ordinance Update: Board acknowledged Mark Shackerford's presentation and will work with the city attorney and transportation board to draft amendments to the private property towing ordinance. - Dispatch Investigation: The inspector committed to reviewing dispatch records and addressing training issues with police officers to ensure fair rotation and proper handling of owner requests.

The Chattanooga Beer Board convened on September 4, 2025, at 9:00 AM to consider new beer permits, a previous beer violation, and public comments. The meeting began with a consent calendar approving two permits, followed by a new application for Shredder's LLC, and a lengthy discussion on a violation involving Exile of May. The board voted to dismiss the violation and accepted public input on training and disorderly conduct. Consent Calendar - 100 Food 8 LLC (Beer Permit 1321) – Approved by regulatory staff. - Riverside Collection LLC (Beer Permit 1352) – Approved by regulatory staff. Public Comments & Testimony - Calandra Smith (Hamilton County Coalition) – Reminded applicants that beer-only permits (without TABC) require training within 60 days of approval. She also commented on the Exile of May discussion, urging businesses to call 911 immediately for any disorderly conduct, even if resolved, to create a record. She noted the challenge when crowds gather on nearby parking lots not owned by the establishment. Discussion Items - Shredder's LLC (Beer Permit 1357) – Brian Hennan, Lewis Armstead, and Chandler Hunt represented the applicant. Chandler Hunt had a 2015 probation violation (alcohol possession) that fell outside the 10-year lookback, allowing permit issuance. Hennan described Shredder's Lair as a used music retail store with a small café selling prepackaged food and beer only (no alcohol). Operating hours: Tuesday–Saturday, 8 AM–10 PM. Occupancy: 49. The board asked about occupancy limits and approved the permit unanimously. - Exile of May – Previous Beer Violation – The board reviewed the hearing officer Trevor Etchley's recommendation to dismiss a complaint from August 21, 2025, regarding Exile of May. The complaint stemmed from three police calls on one night: loitering at 12:55 AM, a domestic call at 1:35 AM, and a large crowd at 2:55 AM. The last call led to a report of an altercation inside the establishment. Board members debated whether the bar properly notified police (manager reportedly told an officer at 1:35 AM) and whether crowds in an adjacent parking lot should be considered the bar's responsibility. The hearing officer recommended dismissal based on the legal requirements of the beer code. After discussion, a motion to sustain the recommendation (dismiss the complaint) was made and seconded. - Frank's and Tobies LLC (Beer Permit 1358) – Approved by regulatory staff; no board action needed. Key Outcomes - Shredder's LLC – Beer permit 1357 approved unanimously (all members voted yes). - Exile of May – The board voted 5–4 to sustain the hearing officer's recommendation and dismiss the complaint. Votes: Yes – Christie, Brooke, Betsy, Zach, Chair; No – Veronica, Reggie, and one additional no (total 4 no votes? Transcript states “three no’s” but roll call shows two explicit no’s; chair counted 5 yes, three no). The complaint was dismissed. - Training Reminder – Calandra Smith’s comment noted that permit holders must complete training within 60 days of approval.

The meeting on August 26, 2025, was called to order by the City Council of Chattanooga, with a focus on a public hearing for the FY26 budget amendment. The council considered two proposals: Mayor Kelly's proposal to set the property tax rate at $1.93 per $100 of assessed value, and an alternate proposal (initially at $1.69, later amended to $1.73) sponsored by Councilman Henderson and Davis. After public testimony, debate, and votes, the council adopted the mayor's proposal (5-4). Consent Calendar - (No consent calendar items were identified in the provided excerpt.) Public Comments & Testimony - Leanne Wiles (District 2) opposed the Henderson/Davis alternate proposal, stating it leaves a $33 million gap and underfunds public safety, and expressed support for Mayor Kelly's plan as a one-step solution. - B. Tabagayavaji (District 9) strongly opposed the Henderson/Davis proposal, saying it cuts services like 311 and disproportionately harms black and brown communities, and urged adoption of Mayor Kelly's plan. - Bob Geyer (District 1, Friends of Mountain Creek) noted home values have risen 57% since 2021, argued the Henderson plan's 1.69 rate would cause a 20% tax bill increase (vs 38% under the mayor's), and requested consideration of fixed-income seniors. - Sherry Kitts (District 3) requested clear justification for the millage rate and expressed concern about hidden spending, such as down-payment assistance programs. - Kim Murphy (District 2) supported the Henderson proposal, argued the city should use $153 million in discretionary funds before raising taxes, and criticized the current property tax model. - Mike Hickman (District 2) stated the mayor's 1.93 rate is a 25% increase, argued city spending has grown 46% since 2021 (far exceeding 23% inflation), and called for more transparent budgeting. - Daniel Braden (District 1) accused Mayor Kelly and media of lying about a "tax decrease," argued that combined city and county rates would reach $3.44 (higher than Nashville), and threatened a recall petition if the increase is forced through. - Justin Cole (President, IBPO; District 6) supported the mayor's proposal, citing critical needs for police vehicles and infrastructure (flooding, malfunctioning traffic lights, crumbling roads). - Anna Galladay (District 8) opposed the alternate proposal, saying it would harm community services and homeless populations, and requested a public budget committee. - Janice Gooden (District 8) expressed uncertainty, advocated for partnerships with nonprofits, and criticized the process as lacking a concrete plan. - Krista Manorino (Signal Centers) supported Mayor Kelly's proposal, emphasizing its positive impact on vulnerable populations. - Officer Blevins (District not stated) argued the alternate proposal is a "band-aid" that doesn't replace vehicles or retain personnel, and urged adoption of the mayor's plan. - Chris Dooley (District 1) supported the 1.69 increase, argued the city should streamline expenses before raising taxes further. - Eddie Owensby (District 3) argued the tax increase would drive senior citizens out of Chattanooga. - Dr. Joshua Tyler (District 6) supported fair pay for first responders but highlighted the affordability crisis: median home prices tripled in five years, 8% of young adults have left since 2020, and 53% of housing units are investor-owned. - Emerson Birch (District 9) presented a 14-page report showing that the city's presentations only covered primary residences (less than half of parcels), and urged the council to demand better data. - Edward Hewitt (District not stated) argued the 1.55 rate already provides $5 million more due to reappraisal, and suggested a compromise lower than 1.93. - Jakir Rasheed (District 5) stated the council already passed a budget with no service cuts and should now fund police/fire raises. - Jan Purdy (District 3) supported the Henderson proposal, arguing it gives department heads discretion to manage cuts. - Curtis Lancaster (District 5) supported Mayor Kelly's plan, citing veteran support for first responder pay and road repairs. - Jack Thompson (Firefighters Association) supported the mayor's proposal, noting that delays would push back equipment delivery by months/years. - Keith Lyles (Firefighters Association) highlighted understaffing at Ladder 21 and argued the alternate proposal does not fund the needed truck. - Marie Mott (District 6) argued the city's growth narrative is a "lie," and the tax increase is a bailout for fiscal mismanagement, and proposed metro government consolidation. - Aaron Morrier (District 9) opposed both plans, saying they harm seniors and disabled on fixed incomes. - Tamika White (SEIU Local 205) urged support for the mayor's proposal, specifically highlighting the need for increased on-call pay. - Trino Coke (District not stated) argued public works employees also deserve raises if first responders get them. - Ryan E. Walt (District 2, former COO) urged finding a middle ground between 1.69 and 1.93, and suggested delaying the deadline via ordinance. - Chris Mullinix (FOP President, District 1) opposed the Henderson proposal, stating it does not fund police vehicles or Ladder 21, and argued a vote for it is a vote against public safety. - Kevin Hayes (District 5) urged collaboration among the mayor and council. - Vivine Hershey (District 1), age 80, argued the cost of living has surged due to outside investors, and supported the Henderson proposal. Discussion Items - Councilman Henderson presented the alternate proposal (to increase the tax rate to $1.69, generating $15 million/year at a median cost of $12/month) and argued it prioritizes fire and police raises and transparency. - Mayor Kelly presented his proposal ($1.93), stating it accounts for 22% inflation since 2021, would be the lowest rate in city history, and would cost a median household about $1/day. - Extensive debate about the process: Councilman Henderson expressed frustration that needs for police vehicles and Ladder 21 were revealed late in the process. City Chief Kevin reported that police vehicle funding had been cut 50% in 2021 and that needs were presented in July. The fire chief confirmed that Ladder 21 needs were presented in the original budget hearings. - Councilman Harvey offered an amendment to the alternate proposal, raising the rate to $1.73 to fund Ladder 21. The amendment passed 7-2. Key Outcomes - Vote on Amendment to Alternate Version (to increase rate to $1.73 and fund Ladder 21): Passed 7-2 (Councilwoman Dotley and Vice Chair Noel opposed). - Vote on Alternate Version (as amended to $1.73): Failed 4-5 (Councilman Henderson, Davis, Harvey, and Chairwoman Hill voted yes; Councilman Clark, Councilwoman Burrs, Councilwoman Dotley, Councilman Elliott, and Vice Chair Noel voted no). - Vote on Mayor's Proposal (to increase tax rate to $1.93): Passed 5-4 (Councilman Elliott, Councilwoman Dotley, Councilwoman Burrs, Councilman Clark, and Vice Chair Noel voted yes; Councilman Harvey, Councilman Davis, Councilman Henderson, and Chairwoman Hill voted no). - Capital Budget Ordinance (increasing capital budget by $13,350,000 from general funds): Approved. - Various resolutions and purchases were approved unanimously or without opposition. - The council recessed from its public hearing at approximately 4:31 PM and resumed regular session at 7:00 PM.

The Chattanooga Beer Board met on August 21, 2025, to consider permit applications and a beer violation. The board approved minutes, voted on a 10-day suspension for a local establishment, granted a temporary beer permit for an event, and deferred a new beer permit application pending zoning approval. Consent Calendar - Minutes from the previous meeting were approved by unanimous voice vote. Discussion Items - New Temporary Beer Permit and New Beer Permit (Pending Zoning): Two applications were initially deferred to the end of the meeting pending arrival of the zoning official. The board voted to postpone them. - Beer Violation – The Dream (Yasmin Springs Major Paper Entertainment LLC): The board reviewed the hearing officer’s recommendation from August 7, 2025, sustaining a violation and recommending a 10-day suspension. After discussion, the board voted unanimously to affirm the 10-day suspension. - Suspension Dates: The board set the suspension to run from August 29, 2025, to September 7, 2025. Some members noted that the establishment is closed on certain days, but the board voted to enforce the 10 calendar-day suspension as set. - Temporary Beer Permit – Smart Music Project Twilight Grand Market: Applicant Robert Davis described the event to be held August 30, 2025, from 5–10 p.m. at the Chattanooga Choo Choo garden area, with a rain date of September 13, 2025. Zoning had been approved, and the board approved the permit unanimously. - New Beer Permit – 100 Food 8 LLC: The applicant, Jeff (Chinese name), described a restaurant with a small ramen bar and about 40 seats, located at 1321 (address). Zoning had not yet been reviewed, so the board took no action and deferred the application to regulatory staff for approval once zoning signs off. Key Outcomes - Minutes approved. - Motion to hold two pending applications until end of meeting passed unanimously. - Motion to affirm hearing officer’s recommendation of 10-day suspension for The Dream passed unanimously. - Motion to set suspension dates August 29 – September 7 passed unanimously. - Motion to approve temporary beer permit for Smart Music Project Twilight Grand Market passed unanimously. - New beer permit for 100 Food 8 LLC deferred to regulatory staff pending zoning approval; no board action taken. No public comments were made during the meeting.