Public Meetings - Chattanooga, Tennessee

The Chattanooga City Council met on August 19, 2025, for a public hearing on the fiscal year 2026 budget amendment. The hearing focused on Mayor Kelly's proposal to set the property tax rate at $1.93 per $100 of assessed value, generating $44.85 million in incremental revenue. The meeting began with an invocation and pledge, followed by a presentation from Chief of Staff Kevin Rowe, and then public comment for one hour. A second public hearing on Councilman Henderson's alternate $1.69 rate proposal is scheduled for the following week. Consent Calendar - Ordinances on final reading (items A–F) were approved as a package without objection. - Consent agenda items included rezonings, easement abandonments, appointments, contract approvals, and routine purchases. Public Comments & Testimony - Donovan Conico (Signal Centers, District 3) expressed full support for the mayor's proposal, stating that underinvestment in city services leads to greater future costs. - Daniel Bradley (District 3) opposed the tax increase, arguing that property assessments have doubled, calling the plan a "Trojan horse" that uses public safety as cover for a "massive tax grab." He demanded a full independent audit of city and county spending. - Beta Bagayavaggie (UTC student body president, Highland Park) strongly supported the mayor's plan, saying cutting the budget would weaken essential services and send a message that Chattanooga is unwilling to invest in young people. - Leanne Wiles (District 2, community advisory committee member) supported the mayor's plan, emphasizing that historically under-resourced communities would feel cuts the most and that it is better to "keep up than to catch up." - Harriet Whitaker (District 8, realtor) supported the $1.93 rate as a "quality compromise" and noted that the cost of maintaining services has increased. - William Ladd III (First Baptist Church, District 8) expressed strong support for the mayor's plan, stating that when property values rise, there is a shared responsibility to invest in the community. - Jeremiah Chambers (UTC student, District 8) spoke in favor of the mayor's plan, emphasizing collaboration and investment in equity and the future. - Emily O'Donnell (Legal Aid of East Tennessee, District 7) supported the mayor's proposal, citing an independent cost-benefit analysis showing that every $1 of public money invested in eviction prevention yields $4.84 in return. - Jessica Stewart (SEIU Local 205 president) supported the mayor's budget, specifically asking for increased on-call pay for city employees (currently $10/day, unchanged in 10 years). - Michael Whitfield (District 4, HOA president) expressed concern about the tax increase, noting he is on a fixed income and cares for a spouse in memory care. He asked why the tax freeze could not be based on his 2024 tax bill. - William Lloyd (District 4) opposed a tax increase, pointing to the city's general fund discretionary balance of $152.9 million, and asked the city to use existing funds before raising taxes. - Blake Wright (District 11) called for compromise between the $1.69 and $1.93 rates, asking council members to work with Ron Elliott on line-item cuts that could fund public safety without a larger tax increase. - Joe Degatano (District 2) urged council to fund police and fire raises but cautioned against a large tax increase, noting landlords will pass costs to tenants and the $34/month impact is significant for struggling families. - Sharonda Brown (Sister RN and Friends, Hooked on Healing 423) thanked the city for supporting her youth mental health and wellness programs, and asked council to fund first responder raises. - Vivian (name provided, senior citizen over 80) opposed a 25% tax increase, saying she lives on limited income and that property values have risen beyond belief. - Catalina Kay (fire wife) spoke in favor of the mayor's plan, describing her husband's 109-hour work weeks and the need for additional staffing, especially at Fire Station 21 in East Brainerd, where population has grown 96% since 1976. - Edward Hewitt (District 9) asked the council to focus on funding for the rest of the city, noting that police and fire are already funded under both proposals. - Sabrina Daniel (address 4410 Maryland Drive) cautioned against raising taxes, citing the city's discretionary fund and the impact on families who have lived in their homes for generations. - Jeff Miller (Chattanooga Police officer) supported the mayor's plan, stating that staying the lowest paid will result in being the least staffed, and noted the sheriff's office starting salary of $62,000. - Sergeant Ernest Crawf (CPD, 28-year veteran) supported the mayor's proposal, saying officers should not have to work multiple extra jobs to support their families. - Sydney Cassavant (CPD patrol officer, peer support team) supported the mayor's plan, stating that officers are forced to work overtime or find extra employment, leading to burnout and a potential mass exodus. - Benjamin Piazza (CPD sergeant, intelligence division) supported the mayor's proposal, sharing his personal story of adoption and the financial strain on officers. - Joseph Fogg (CPD officer, two years) supported the mayor's plan, noting that Chattanooga officers experience more traumatic calls than officers in other departments and are the lowest paid in the region. - Andrew Peker (CPD training director) supported the mayor's plan, stating he works three jobs and that officers report leaving CPD due to pay. - Sergeant Brown (CPD, two and a half years) supported the mayor's proposal, describing the stress of working multiple extra jobs and the impact on family life. - Officer Curtis Botcha (CPD, seven years) supported the mayor's plan, saying his salary is not enough to live off of and that he is considering leaving the department he loves. - Chris Melonix (FOP president, four years) supported the mayor's plan, stating the department is in worse shape than in 2021, with 71 operational vacancies, and that CPD is the lowest paid comparable agency in the Southeast. - Stephen Russell (wastewater department, SEIU Local 205) supported the mayor's budget, focusing on the need for increased on-call pay and solidarity with uniformed workers. - John John (District 9, former volunteer firefighter) asked for clarity on what would be lost if the lower $1.69 rate is adopted, noting that both proposals fully fund police and fire (except Station 21). He urged long-term sustainable development and zoning reform. - Chris Dooley (District 5, retired police and fire) supported a tax increase for police and fire but urged the city to watch spending and protect seniors on fixed incomes. - Monty Bell (address 727 East 11th Street) addressed the council during the general public comment period, referencing a lawsuit and alleging mistreatment by the city and county. He stated this was his last time addressing the council in that capacity. Discussion Items - Budget Presentation (Kevin Rowe, Chief of Staff): Rowe presented the mayor's $1.93 proposal, which would increase the general fund from $345 million to $390 million, generating $44.85 million in incremental revenue. Of that, $31.5 million would go to operations (primarily public safety and infrastructure) and $13.35 million to capital expenses. The median incremental cost to homeowners is $34/month. Rowe compared Chattanooga's operating dollars per resident to Knoxville and Nashville, showing Chattanooga would still be lower. He also noted Tennessee's overall tax burden is the third lowest in the country. - Budget Calendar: Chairwoman Dotley confirmed that the council will vote on both the mayor's $1.93 proposal and Councilman Henderson's $1.69 alternate proposal on August 26, with a final vote on the winning proposal on September 9. - Public Hearing Rules: The city attorney read the rules: speakers have two minutes, one-hour limit, no vulgar language, address council as a whole. Key Outcomes - Decision on FY26 Budget Amendment: Deferred to August 26, 2025, when the council will vote on both the mayor's $1.93 proposal and Councilman Henderson's $1.69 alternate proposal. The winning proposal will receive a final vote on September 9, 2025. - Consent Agenda Approved: All items on final reading, first reading ordinances (wastewater), and resolutions were passed unanimously. - Purchase Approvals: Six purchases and one RFP were approved, including a backhoe loader, dump trucks, a tractor/mower, and wastewater valves. - Committee Reports: Council members reported on flood relief efforts, town hall meetings, and upcoming community events. - Next Steps: A second public hearing on Councilman Henderson's $1.69 proposal will be held on August 26, 2025, at 3:30 p.m.

The Chattanooga City Council convened on August 19, 2025, to receive two major presentations: a community risk reduction update from the fire department focusing on cooking fire prevention, and a multi-departmental after-action report on the historic flood event that occurred in mid-August. The meeting included data-driven discussions, personal stories, and commitments to improve emergency response and infrastructure resilience. Consent Calendar - Council approved the minutes from the previous meeting without objection. Discussion Items Fire Prevention & Community Risk Reduction (Alan Green, CFD Life Safety Educator) - Alan Green presented the concept of Community Risk Reduction (CRR), emphasizing proactive strategies to identify and mitigate risks beyond traditional fire response. - He reported that cooking fires accounted for 18.92% of structure fires in 2023 (42 of 222) and 24.0% in 2024 (73 of 304), noting an upward trend. The 37421 ZIP code had the highest number of cooking fires both years. - Green highlighted the CRR framework's five E's (Education, Engineering, Enforcement, Economic Incentives, Emergency Response) and an unofficial sixth E (Empowerment). - He shared a success story: resident Carrie Harris's smoke alarm (installed by CFD) alerted her to a candle-related fire, saving her and her daughter. - Councilman Dolly confirmed that firefighters work on special assignment (with compensation) for CRR activities. Councilwoman Burst asked about grant funding; Green cited partnerships with the U.S. Fire Administration and organizations for smoke alarm and escape ladder programs. Flood Response & Recovery - Meteorologist Brian Smith described the August 2025 flood as a rare event with rain rates of 6-9 inches per hour and 5.5 inches in three hours, comparable to a 200–500 year storm. No flash flood warning was issued beforehand. - Fire Chief Chambers reported 50+ rescue calls, 36 stranded citizens rescued, and one fatality. Over 100 firefighters responded. The swiftwater rescue team received state accreditation, allowing deployment statewide and nationally. - Public Works Administrator Jeremy Wood stated crews responded to 100+ service calls, including clearing catch basins and downed trees. 300+ personnel were involved on day two. The storm was categorized as a 200–500 year event. - Wastewater Director Mark Heinzer noted that 230 million gallons were treated; 11 billion gallons of rain fell citywide. Power was lost at some pump stations (e.g., Citico), but most performed well. Ongoing consent decree improvements (40 million gallons of storage) are expected to improve capacity within two years. - Community Development Interim Administrator Cedric Henson reported that the Chris L. Ramsey Center was activated for 21 evacuees. He proposed a framework (24hr/48hr/FOC) for integrating services like American Red Cross and Tennessee VOAD. Councilwoman Burst suggested Red Cross should lead in disaster response. - Police Chief Chambers said 427 flood-related calls were handled; off-duty officers were activated via take-home cars. Two patrol vehicles were damaged, one a total loss. - Deputy COO Steve Wilson outlined improvements: developing a checklist for Mayor's Office EOC representatives, training for non-emergency staff, and coordinating with TEMA for potential reimbursement (threshold $1.6 million). He noted the city does not yet use the state's damage assessment software (Survey123). Key Outcomes - Council directed staff to compile information on FEMA/TEMA assessment procedures and debris cleanup in public spaces, particularly in Bellford and South Brainerd districts. - Council acknowledged the swiftwater team's accreditation and committed to continued investment in emergency services. - The city will pursue after-action reviews with partner agencies (e.g., Red Cross) to improve communication and resource pre-positioning.

The Chattanooga Sports Authority Board convened to discuss the South Broad District Ballpark project, review financial progress, and approve several change orders and payments. The project remains on schedule and under the $86 million stadium budget, with approximately $37 million spent and $59 million encumbered. All resolutions were approved unanimously. Consent Calendar - The minutes from the June 12, 2025, meeting were approved unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were made. Discussion Items - Financial Progress Report (August 2025): Paul Boylan, from the city's accounting department, presented a detailed budget breakdown. The stadium budget stands at $86 million, with a total project budget (including infrastructure) of $125 million. Encumbrances total $59 million, actual expenditures are $37 million, and a third drawdown of $14 million from US Bank is underway. The board appreciated the increased clarity of the report. - Construction Update: Sherry Allen (Senior Advisor for Economic and Community Development) and Andy Stone (Perimeter Properties) provided an update via slides and drone video. Structural work on the powerhouse, pattern shop, and third base building is underway. The field was raised 10 feet during schematic design to address groundwater concerns from off-site contamination. The riverwalk closed in July 2025 for utility work and is expected to reopen in Q1 2026. The project is on schedule despite heavy rains, thanks to a designed drainage system. DBE participation is progressing toward the 30% goal. - Change Order 1 (Executive Architect Contract): Resolution authorizing $735,960.75 plus $45,000 in reimbursable expenses (total contract value $5,123,960.75) for design revisions, including field elevation changes, powerhouse and pattern shop revisions, kitchen equipment coordination, and theme regulation coordination. The initial contract had a $400,000 contingency that is eliminated, yielding a net increase of $335,906. All costs remain within the $86 million stadium budget. Approved. - Change Order 2 (S&ME Materials Testing Contract): Resolution adding $143,615 for special inspections (e.g., 100% weld testing on the third base building) to the existing contract, for a total contract value of $327,062. The increase is due to more extensive testing requirements than initially assumed. Still within overall budget. Approved. - Payment to Pipe Properties (Escrow Agreement): Resolution authorizing $167,862 from unallocated interest on the sports authority's bonds, per the escrow agreement signed in October 2024. This covers carrying costs for funds placed in escrow at bond sale. Discussion clarified that these interest funds are not part of the stadium budget but are a contractual obligation. Approved. - Natural Gas Service Resolution: Resolution authorizing up to $80,002.01 for extending natural gas service from Chattanooga Gas Company to the ballpark to support food operations. This is within the overall project budget. Approved. - TIF Revenue Reporting: Board members requested future reports showing actual TIF revenue compared to projections. Staff agreed to add this to future meeting materials. Key Outcomes - All five resolutions (items 5–8) were approved unanimously. - The project remains on schedule for completion and under the $86 million stadium budget, with $59 million encumbered and $37 million spent. - Staff will provide TIF revenue tracking in future board meetings, including a side-by-side comparison with projections.

Note: The meeting transcript references a date of Tuesday, August 25th, which conflicts with the provided meeting date of August 12, 2025. This summary uses the provided date, as the discrepancy could not be resolved from available materials. The Chattanooga City Council convened on August 12, 2025, for a regular business meeting followed by a Community Development Committee meeting. The council addressed a series of planning and zoning cases, resolutions, purchases, and heard public comments on the upcoming budget, particularly concerning funding for fire and police services. Key votes included approval of multiple rezoning requests, denial of two, deferral of one, and approval of several contract awards and fund transfers. Planning & Zoning Items (Items A-I) The council considered nine rezoning and zoning map correction items. Several were approved, two were denied, and one was deferred. - Item A (4525 Higgs and Pike): Applicant sought rezoning from CC to IL (Light Industrial) due to storage containers on site. Staff and Planning Commission recommended denial. Opposition (Hannah Claire Bogas on behalf of Highland Pediatrics) cited safety concerns for children and incompatibility with the corridor. Council voted to deny (motion by Councilman Harvey, seconded). - Item B (1000 block of Lepton Drive): Rezoning from RN3 to CC (Commercial Corridor) with conditions. Council voted to approve. - Item C (7458 & 7460 Pinewood Drive): Applicant did not appear; Planning Commission recommended denial. Councilman Harvey reported unsuccessful attempts to contact the developer. Council voted to deny. - Item D (1721-1735 Joiner Road): Rezoning from CNT/RN16 to RN3. Applicant communicated with neighborhood; no opposition. Council voted to approve. - Item E (7117 Bonnie Oaks Drive): Rezoning from RN16 to CNT. No opposition. Council voted to approve with conditions. - Item F (6401 Mountain View Road): Deferral requested by applicant due to utility issues. Council voted to defer to September 9, 2025. - Item G (4905 & 4907 Patton Town Road): Lifting a condition from a previous case and adding a new condition as per staff recommendation. Council voted to approve with new condition (single-unit detached residential only). - Item H (3524 Broad Street): Rezoning from CMU1 to CR (Regional Commercial) with a condition (no vehicular access to Chambliss Drive). Councilman Dotley expressed support for new development. Council voted to approve. - Item I: Corrections to the official zoning map. Council voted to approve. Resolutions & Contract Awards - Item A (Economic Development): Resolution to transfer $588,809.98 from the terminated Chattanooga Opportunity Fund (CNE) to the Industrial Development Board (IDB) for economic development purposes, specifically for small business programs. Council voted to approve. - Item B: Resolution to amend and renew a Brownfield Cleanup Grant management agreement with Southeast Tennessee Development District. Council voted to approve. - Items C & D (Public Works): Contract awards: Mountain Creek Stream Restoration to Global Infrastructure Inc. ($1,996,500 total) and Chattanooga Skate Park to Robert Roberts LLC ($1,049,826.73 total). Council voted to approve. - Items E & F (Wastewater): Contract award for Big Ridge 2 Pump Station improvements to Jay Brennan Construction ($2,088,000 total) and reassignment of a contract from WK Dixon to Ardura Group Inc. due to acquisition. Council voted to approve. Purchases - Three purchases recommended for approval: (1) One Kubota skid steer for $98,734.67 (Fleet). (2) Three-year renewal for Pandora's European Motor Sports with a corrected 16% price increase (up from 14% due to a clerical error), new annual spend $600,000. (3) Name change for Technology Services agreement from Grid Smart Technology to Cubic Transportation Systems. Council voted to approve with a verbal amendment noting the correction. Two sole source purchases were reported for wastewater: IT Pipe software ($22,425) and Varec Flame Arrestors ($30,372). Community Development Committee Meeting - Summer Camp Program Update: Interim Administrator Cedric Henson presented results of the 2025 summer camp program (June 2 - July 25). Key statistics: 625 participants registered; 12 youth camps (ages 6-12), 2 teen camps (ages 13-16), 4 senior adult sites; 49 camp counselors; 130+ field trips; 100% online registration via the MyChattConnect app; partnerships with Chattanooga Fire Department, Juvenile Court, CarFit, and YMCA (provided 21,000 meals). The program aimed to foster growth, development, and social engagement. Councilman Clark emphasized that such programs are vital for community development. - Administrative Restructure & Hiring Process: Deputy COO Steve Wilson discussed plans to integrate Community Health and Community Engagement divisions into the Community Development department to create a community resource hub model. The job description for the permanent administrator is being updated. Councilman Clark proposed that the mayor's chosen candidate meet with all council members before appointment, to improve collaboration and oversight. The mayor is reportedly in favor. Councilwoman Hill stressed the need for consistent HR processes. The restructuring ordinance is expected to come before council in future considerations. Public Comments & Testimony - Sabrina Grace Daniel (District 8 area resident): Expressed concern that development approvals do not adequately consider infrastructure (water, sewer, roads, schools) and quality of life. Urged the council to prioritize factual data over tax revenue from development. - Christine Nguyen (District 9): Criticized Mayor Kelly's fiscal management, alleging a 210% increase in executive spending since 2021, elimination of lower-paid positions while adding high-salary roles, and deceptive messaging about the proposed tax rate. She argued that the $1.99 tax rate is not a historic tax cut, as state law mandates a rate of 1.55, and that the administration's spending on development projects (e.g., $12 million stadium exposure) burdens taxpayers. She called for administrative cuts and accountability before passing any tax increase. - Keith (Chattanooga Firefighter, name not fully given): Expressed support for proposed raises for fire and police ($14 million for fire) but worried about potential cuts to other services. He noted 37 current vacancies and 139 members eligible to retire in five years (40% of the department), stressing the need for competitive pay to retain senior leadership and avoid station brownouts. He clarified that the immediate ISO rating concern is more about staffing than Ladder 21, though Ladder 21 is also needed. In response, Councilman Henderson confirmed that the $14 million for fire is expected to pass and is sufficient to prevent brownouts. Councilman Harvey sought details on the cost of Ladder 21 ($4 million total including truck, equipment, and personnel). Councilman Clark underscored that other city services (public health, community development, etc.) should not be neglected. Key Outcomes & Decisions - Planning & Zoning Votes: Item A denied; Item B approved; Item C denied; Item D approved; Item E approved; Item F deferred to September 9; Item G approved with new condition; Item H approved; Item I approved. - Resolutions & Contracts: All items (Economic Dev. A, Brownfield B, Public Works C-D, Wastewater E-F) approved. - Purchases: Three items approved with corrected pricing noted. - Community Development: The summer camp report was received; administrative restructuring discussed but no vote taken. Councilman Clark's proposal for council input on the hiring process was noted. - Budget & Tax Rate: Public comments highlighted concerns about the administration's budget proposal; council members reiterated that fire and police raises will be included in the final budget. A public hearing on the administration's tax rate proposal was announced for August 19, 2025, at 3:30 PM. - Future Meetings: Councilman Elliott announced a District 9 town hall on August 18; Councilman Davis announced a District 5 town hall on August 21 (and additional dates); Councilwoman Dotley reminded of public hearings on August 19 and 26.

The City Council Ad Hoc Committee met on August 12, 2025, at approximately 5:30 PM to finalize an alternate version of the FY26 amended budget. The primary goal was to fund fire and police pay raises through a combination of budget cuts/reallocations and a modest property tax increase, with a target of raising $10–$15 million in new revenue. The meeting featured extensive debate over blanket percentage cuts versus line-item cuts, the potential impact on community services, and the appropriate tax rate. A compromise proposal emerged late in the meeting. Discussion Items - Purpose and Context: Chair Councilman Henderson stated the meeting was to set an alternate budget version sponsored by Councilwoman Hill and Councilman Davis. He noted that the council is not required to approve a line-item budget; it can approve a budget that funds each department as a whole. He also highlighted that there are approximately $18 million in budgeted but unfilled positions, of which about $3.9 million could be frozen without layoffs. - Chairwoman Hill's Proposal: Councilwoman Hill presented a detailed plan to achieve $10.1 million in reductions by cutting 10% from the mayor's office and city council, 15% from community development, and smaller percentages from other departments, while protecting fire, police, public works, and parks. She also proposed a 13–14 cent property tax increase to generate additional revenue. The plan aimed to meet the council's previous commitment to fund half the fire/police raise through cuts. - Opposition to Blanket Cuts: Several members, including Councilwoman Dotley, Councilman Clark, and Councilman Elliott, expressed strong opposition to blanket percentage cuts without knowing the specific line items or impacts. Councilwoman Dotley stated that her district (District 8) should not lose any services and that the cuts appeared to have "racial undertones" that would disproportionately affect Black and brown communities. Councilman Clark argued that blanket cuts are irresponsible and that the council should conduct a line-by-line review. - Proposed Compromise: Councilman Henderson suggested a 14-cent increase (from $1.55 to $1.69), which would generate $15 million in new revenue—$2.1 million above the amount needed for the fire/police raises. He proposed restoring $1.6 million to community development, $167,000 to early learning, and splitting the remaining $368,000 between the executive branch and information technology. Councilwoman Hill and Councilman Davis agreed to this as the co-sponsors. - Concerns About Fire Station 21 and ISO Rating: Councilwoman Dotley raised the need to fund Fire Station 21 and apparatus (approximately $4 million) to maintain the city's ISO 1 rating, warning that failure to do so would increase homeowner insurance premiums for all residents. Neither Mayor Kelly's $1.99 proposal nor the alternate $1.69 proposal included this funding. - Legal Guidance: City Attorney Turner explained that the budget ordinance must balance revenues and expenditures, and that any amendment must comply with state law. He noted that the tax rate must be fixed before October 1 for property tax bills. Key Outcomes - Compromise Proposal Adopted: The committee agreed to set an alternate budget version based on a 14-cent tax increase (millet rate of $1.69), generating $15 million in new revenue. This revenue will fully fund the requested fire and police pay raises, restore community development and early learning budgets to their original levels, and direct additional funds to the executive branch and IT. The specific reductions from other departments were not finalized in detail but will be updated in a revised document. - Next Steps: Councilwoman Hill will update the digital budget document to reflect the compromise and distribute it to all council members. The alternate version will be presented at the next public hearing for debate and a vote. The full council will need to approve a final budget ordinance before October 1.

The Passenger Vehicle Record Board convened on Thursday, August 7, 2025, at 3:49 PM. The meeting began with approval of a temporary permit transfer and a temporary permit for Richard Bridgman of Nouga Taxi, followed by public comments and discussion on pending lawsuits, towing rate increases, and ordinance updates. Consent Calendar - Transfer of Privileges T98: Approved from Mr. J. Easters to Mr. Richard Bridgeman. Motion carried unanimously. - Temporary Permit: Approved for Mr. Richard Bridgman. Motion carried unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Jonathan Easter (Nouga Taxi): Asked to confirm that pending violations related to a lawsuit involving Mercury transportation are encompassed in that lawsuit. He expressed concern that the lawsuit's scope might not include violations and requested updates at monthly board meetings. The board responded that they are awaiting the court ruling before bringing Mercury before the board. - Mark Shackleford (Shackleford Tower and Recovery, Vice President of Tennessee Tow Association): Described recent and upcoming state law changes (effective July 1, 2025 and next July 1) affecting towing and recovery reporting, and private property towing. He requested the city review and update its 15-year-old private property towing ordinance. He also expressed frustration with a two-year delay in receiving a response on a rate increase that was supposed to be addressed at the meeting. He asked for a formal meeting to discuss these issues and receive a response. Discussion Items - Lawsuit and Pending Violations: The board confirmed that Mercury transportation matters are on hold pending a lawsuit outcome. Mr. Easter questioned whether violations should be treated separately. - Towing Rate Increase: Discussion centered on a rate increase that has been pending for two years. Mark Shackleford noted that the last rate adjustment based on inflation was supposed to occur annually under the ordinance (Section 35-160). There was confusion about whether the board must recommend increases to city council. The city attorney (unidentified) said they will look into the inflation data and the ordinance language. - City Ordinance Update: The board agreed to put Mr. Shackleford on the September agenda to formally hear his concerns and recommendations regarding towing ordinance updates and rate increases. They will allow him adequate time to present without the usual 2-3 minute limit. - Legislative Changes: Discussion about how the city monitors state law changes; an attorney noted they try to stay on top of changes but there is no clear trigger. Jonathan Easter added context about Uber/Lyft regulations being preempted by state law as precedent. Key Outcomes - Scheduled September Presentation: Mark Shackleford will be placed on the September regular agenda (September 4, 2025 at 3:30 PM) to present his proposals on towing ordinance updates and rate increases. The board will receive written materials in advance. - City Attorney Follow-Up: The board will reach out to Chris Anderson in the mayor's office to obtain an answer on the rate increase and to review the inflation-based adjustment mechanism. - Adjournment: Motion to adjourn carried.

The Chattanooga Beer Board convened on August 7, 2025, to approve the minutes from the previous meeting, accept routine beer permits cleared by regulatory staff, and deliberate on a contested beer permit application for a new downtown Embassy Suites hotel. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: The board unanimously approved the minutes from the July 17, 2025 meeting. - Routine Beer Permits: The board acknowledged three permits approved by regulatory staff: TWS Golf LLC (Beer-1324), 100 Food Five LLC (Beer-1323), and Speedway 42185 (Beer-1353). Discussion Items - Beer Permit 1348 (Vision RCC LLC dba Embassy Suites): Board legal staff reported the permit was on hold due to concerns with the applicant's ownership structure. The original application did not clearly identify an individual with a 5% or greater stake in the applicant LLC, a requirement for accountability. Ownership representative Glenn Hogan and General Manager Michelle Malone presented a revised organizational chart (submitted August 6, 2025). The chart showed Vision RCC LLC is owned by Vision Riverfront District LLC (88.43%) and New Vision Broad and Fourth LLC. Within Vision Riverfront District LLC, Mitch Patel (Matul I. Patel) holds a 19.74% stake, resulting in a derivative ownership of roughly 17.45% in Vision RCC LLC, making him the only individual with more than a 5% interest. The board and legal counsel examined the LLC structure. Board member Trevor Ashley clarified that in a "manager-managed" LLC, the manager has binding authority to act, and legal staff confirmed that Mr. Patel, as the manager, is the responsible party for the permit. The board also discussed the permit's carry-out provision, which would cover both a public hotel bar and a guest-only pantry. The applicant confirmed the hotel enforces a 100% carding policy and trains staff to prevent off-premises consumption by non-guests, in compliance with local ordinances. Key Outcomes - Permit 1348 Approval: The board voted unanimously to approve the application. The roll call vote was 8 in favor (members Zach, Betsy, JW, Ron, Veronica, Christine/Christina, and the Chair) with 1 member (Brooke) absent. - Adjournment: The board approved a motion to adjourn the regular meeting and immediately proceed to a scheduled administrative hearing.

The Chattanooga City Council met on August 5, 2025, at 7:23 PM. The meeting included routine approvals, a contested fire chief confirmation, a senior tax freeze resolution, and a public hearing schedule adjustment for the proposed 2025-2026 budget. Council members deliberated on the fire chief appointment process and the tax freeze reopening, while multiple public speakers addressed the proposed property tax increase, first responder pay, and budget transparency. Consent Calendar - Minutes from the previous meeting were approved without objection. - Public Works Items: Two items (A alternate version and B) for district two were approved unanimously after first reading. - Resolutions: - Item A (tax freeze) passed unanimously after an amendment to reopen applications was withdrawn due to state deadlines. - Item C (appointment of Manuel Douglas to Downtown Redevelopment Corporation Board) passed. - Items D, E, F (TDOT proposals for US41, rockfall mitigation) passed as a package. - Items G and H (street naming for Milton L. Jackson Sr. and Florence High) passed. - Item I (on-call contracts for wastewater services) passed. - Purchases: Five purchases approved including janitorial supplies ($170,000), pharmacy benefit name change, Harley-Davidson repairs ($61,000), Enterprise rental extension, and playground equipment ($234,537.59). Public Comments & Testimony - Scott Burkeville (District 4 resident) opposed the proposed tax hike, citing personal financial strain from tornado damage, increased insurance, and property assessment increases. He called for eliminating “pork” in the budget. - Jack Thompson (President, Chattanooga Firefighters Association) supported the mayor’s proposed 1.99 millage rate, stating it is needed to recruit and retain firefighters and maintain services. - Jason Brown (SEIU Local 205) supported the 1.99 millage rate, highlighting the need for improved on-call pay for city employees, including fire and police. - Stephen Russell (SEIU member, wastewater employee) supported the mayor’s budget and opposed cuts that would lead to layoffs. He also expressed solidarity with UAW workers at Volkswagen. - Keith Lyles (Vice President, Chattanooga Firefighters Association) supported the budget and noted that Chattanooga firefighters are among the lowest paid in the region, affecting retention. - Monty Bale performed a song about the budget. - Marie Mott (District 6) criticized the council’s handling of pension obligations, which grew from $5.8M to $18M (210% increase), and accused the council of hiding pension costs while giving tax incentives to corporations like Nippon Paint. She warned of potential bankruptcy. - Terry Bonfilio (District 8) questioned the senior tax freeze, noting it only freezes at the current high rate, and asked why property taxes are needed despite new commercial construction generating revenue. - Melanie Stover (District 7, retired widow) asked why the mayor’s budget approved in June did not already include fire/police raises, and requested a line-by-line review of the supplemental budget. - Eric Atkins (Co-chair, Unity Group of Chattanooga) criticized the redistricting process as flawed and urged transparency, referencing past community benefits agreement failures. - Sabrina Daniel (retired teacher) called for a careful line-item review of the budget to eliminate waste before raising taxes. Discussion Items - Fire Chief Appointment: Council considered the confirmation of Terry Knowles as fire chief. Several members (Councilwomen Dotley, Vice Chair Noel, Councilman Clark) expressed concerns about the selection process, citing lack of transparency and fairness. Councilman Henderson, who was on the interview committee, defended the process, stating a scoring matrix was used in the first two rounds and Knowles scored highest. Mayor Kelly acknowledged concerns but took responsibility for the decision, emphasizing that all finalists were excellent. He also apologized for comments made in a previous meeting. The vote was 7-0-2 (Dotley and Noel abstaining). - Senior Tax Freeze Resolution: Councilman Elliott proposed an amendment to reopen applications for the tax freeze until September 12, 2025, to allow seniors to lock in before potential tax rate changes. Finance staff (Phil and Weston) clarified that the state’s 35-day application window after the delinquency date (March 1) had closed for 2024 taxes (deadline April 4/5), so the amendment could only apply to 2025 taxes. Elliott withdrew the amendment, and the main resolution (increasing income limit to $60,000) passed unanimously. - Budget Timeline: Councilman Henderson requested moving the public hearing for the council’s alternative budget from August 19 to August 26 to allow time for an ad hoc committee meeting (scheduled for August 12 at 1:30 PM). After debate, the council agreed to hold the administration’s public hearing on August 19 and the council’s alternative budget public hearing on August 26. First reading for both versions will be on August 26, and second reading on September 9. Budget Chairwoman Dotley noted the September 9 date is a tight deadline for finalizing tax bills. - Planning & Zoning Committee: The committee reviewed seven upcoming rezoning cases, including a request for storage containers (recommended denial), a townhome proposal (recommended denial due to compatibility), a conditional lift for single-family development (recommended approval), and a drive-through coffee shop (approved with a condition). No votes were taken; these are scheduled for first reading the following week. Key Outcomes - Fire Chief Confirmed: Terry Knowles confirmed as fire chief with a vote of 7-0-2. - Senior Tax Freeze Resolution Passed: Income limit raised to $60,000; amendment to reopen applications withdrawn. - Budget Public Hearing Schedule Set: - Admin budget public hearing: August 19, 2025. - Council alternative budget public hearing: August 26, 2025. - First reading (both): August 26, 2025. - Second reading: September 9, 2025. - Street Naming Resolutions Passed: Central Avenue segment to be designated Milton L. Jackson Sr. Avenue; West 45th Street segment to be designated Florence High Avenue. - Other Resolutions: TDOT agreements, contracts for wastewater services, and purchases approved. - Ad Hoc Budget Committee Meeting: Scheduled for August 12, 2025, at 1:30 PM to discuss alternative budget. - Councilman Elliott’s District 9 Town Hall: Announced for August 18, 2025, at 6 PM at Redemption to the Nations Church.

This work session of the Chattanooga City Council on August 5, 2025, continued the discussion on the proposed 1.99 millage rate for the fiscal year budget. The administration presented a detailed breakdown of how the incremental $46 million in revenue would be allocated, focusing on public safety, paving, affordable housing, and other priorities. Council members debated the appropriate rate and spending priorities, with several alternative proposals emerging. The meeting also addressed concerns about the mayor's previous comments and set a timeline for final decision. Discussion Items - Administration's Proposal for 1.99 Millage: Kevin (Chief of Staff) presented the administration's plan, emphasizing that the 1.99 rate is a 26-cent decrease from the previous 2.25 rate but would generate $46 million in incremental revenue. Key allocations include: $18 million for police and fire pay (after a $5 million down payment already made), $7.5 million for paving, $5.5 million for pension transfer, $2.5 million for CPD vehicles, $1.1 million for a new fire truck, $750,000 for safe/clean streets, $500,000 for cybersecurity (year two), $500,000 for violence interruption expansion, $250,000 for traffic signal improvement/maintenance, $225,000 for traffic management staffing, $150,000 for CPD drone program, $100,000 for an additional deputy fire chief, $100,000 for a CPD traffic monitoring position (photo radar), $2 million for parks maintenance, $1.3 million for targeted neighborhood economic development, $150,000 for an early learning facility, $69,000 for Monday.com licenses, $15,000 for the Berkman personality test, and $55,000 for SEIU on-call callback increase. For affordable housing, $3 million for down payment assistance and $1 million for owner-occupied rehab were proposed. - Councilmember Elliott: Questioned the $15,000 Berkman personality test, calling it "ridiculous" when residents face tax increases. He also raised concerns about the fire apparatus cost, noting that the ladder truck for Station 21 would cost $1.6 million plus $100,000 equipment, not the $1.1 million listed. He expressed reluctance to support blanket cuts and emphasized the need for line-item precision. - Councilmember Harvey: Advocated for higher police and fire pay, suggesting a "top of market" scenario that would cost approximately $29 million (compared to the $23 million proposed). He also requested clarity on neighborhood economic development projects and challenged the administration to prioritize first responder pay over other items. He expressed concern about the mayor's "political threat" and wanted the mayor to clarify publicly. - Council Chairwoman Hill: Presented an alternative budget focusing only on police and fire pay increases at a 1.70 millage rate, which would generate $16.6 million and require no other new spending. This would cost residents an average of $22/month. She noted that her district is split 50/50 on the 1.99 plan, with longer-term homeowners more concerned about the tax impact. She emphasized the need for a multi-year approach to infrastructure and parks funding. - Councilmember Henderson: Proposed an alternative budget at a 1.67 millage rate, based on Chair Hill's earlier concept, which would fully fund police and fire pay ($23 million total, including the $5 million down payment) and require $1.5 million in budget cuts. He sought co-sponsorship for this proposal to be placed on the agenda. Councilmember Davis agreed to co-sponsor. Henderson also stressed that this must be a multi-year effort and suggested an ad hoc committee to identify line items for cuts. - Councilmember Davis: Supported the 1.67 alternative, stating that he had received little constituent support for the mayor's proposal and that the mayor's "threatening language" was unhelpful. He emphasized fiscal conservatism and the need to minimize the tax burden. - Councilmember Burris: Opposed any cuts to community development, calling it "the heartbeat of the city." She supported the administration's 1.99 proposal, noting that past underfunding led to service disruptions (e.g., curbside recycling cuts). She also stressed the need for a solid plan for community center security to avoid creating new problems. - Council Vice Chair Noel: Did not support Chair Hill's alternative, stating she would be "100% behind" the administration's proposal. She argued that past councils failed to properly fund services and that now is the time to invest. - Councilmember Harvey (again): Requested to be on the ad hoc committee and reiterated that getting water to Rackam Mountain should be prioritized over park spending. - Discussion on Rental Assistance: Several councilmembers (likely Elliott and others) requested inclusion of rental assistance. The administration explained that down payment assistance and owner-occupied rehab are more effective and that rental assistance is expensive and not in the current budget. Chair Hill noted that a per-unit analysis shows rental property tax increases are lower than for single-family homes. - Community Center Security: Councilmember Elliott and Harvey suggested involving CPD and considering an SRO-style presence rather than contracted security that has proven ineffective. The administration indicated this would be part of a new RFP. - Mayor's Comment: Councilmembers Henderson and Harvey expressed concern about the mayor's statement that the "reverse is true" regarding council votes. Kevin clarified that the administration's intent was to communicate resource constraints, not political punishment. Key Outcomes - Administration's Revised Proposal: Kevin agreed to incorporate feedback into the 1.99 proposal: add $1.7 million for a ladder truck for Station 21 (correcting the $1.1 million figure), remove the $15,000 personality test, and include rental assistance. An ordinance will be drafted for the agenda. - Alternative Proposal at 1.67: Councilmember Henderson and Councilmember Davis will co-sponsor an alternative budget at a 1.67 millage rate, which would fully fund police and fire pay and require $1.5 million in budget cuts. This proposal will be discussed at an ad hoc committee meeting. - Ad Hoc Committee: An ad hoc committee meeting to review line items for potential cuts was scheduled for August 12, 2025. Councilmembers Henderson, Elliott, Harvey, and others will participate. The meeting must be publicly noticed. - Public Hearing and Reading Dates: The public hearing on the budget amendment is set for August 19, 2025, with first reading on August 26, 2025. The final reading must occur by September 9, 2025, to meet the October 1 tax bill deadline. The alternative proposal must be available 10 days prior to the public hearing (by August 9) for proper notice, though amendments from the floor are possible. - Next Steps: Council will finalize the tax rate and budget through these meetings, with the goal of avoiding service disruptions while addressing police/fire pay and other critical needs.