Public Meetings - Fort Smith, Arkansas

The Fort Smith City Board held a special strategic workshop on June 29, 2026, facilitated by Dr. Mickey Biggs from the UAFS Center for Economic Development. Mayor was absent due to illness; Board Member Kevin was nominated as chair. The meeting focused on reviewing the city's values, mission, and vision, conducting a SWOT analysis, and setting priorities for the next year. Board members, senior staff, and finance director participated. Consent Calendar - No consent calendar items were presented. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were made. Discussion Items - Review of Values, Mission, Vision: The board reaffirmed the existing values (safety, quality of services, quality of life, opportunity, financial responsibility, hardworking community) and the mission and vision statements. A motion was made to have them printed and posted in the Blue Line and boardroom. - SWOT Analysis Results: - Strengths: FMS project, strong education and military anchors (UAFS, ACH, Ebbing AFB), geographic location as regional hub, abundant water supply, parks system. Board members also added parks as a strength. - Weaknesses: Water capital project financing, consent decree obligations, incivility among elected officials, communication issues, low population growth, lower salaries, downtown performance, lack of community engagement, need for a multi-purpose sports complex, competing general fund priorities, police/fire budget cuts, uncertainty due to city administrator process, and homelessness. - Opportunities: Investment tied to FMS, manufacturing growth, leverage of geography/I-49/NWA, riverfront development, retail and small business growth, housing availability linked to workforce, and potential shift in city governance model. - Threats: Competition with Northwest Arkansas for jobs and talent, manufacturing vulnerabilities, skilled labor shortages, public perception, social media influence, leadership uncertainty, health care crisis, and availability of illegal drugs. - Dot Voting Results: - Top strengths: FMS project and strong education/military anchors (tie). - Top weakness: Water capital projects. - Top opportunity: FMS-related opportunities. - Top threat: Public perception; tie for second between competition with NWA and the health care crisis. - Breakout Group Strategies: - Group 1 (FMS + homelessness): Suggested using F35 and ancillary jobs to prevent homelessness, developing an international downtown corridor, and updating Future Fort Smith to address homelessness. - Group 2 (education/military + competing general fund priorities): Proposed partnerships for internships, training, grant discovery, and challenging leaders to live in Fort Smith. - Group 3 (geographic hub + water capital financing): Recommended regional partnerships for long-term water planning, updating the regional hydrology study, and exploring an infrastructure surcharge for outside users. - Homelessness: The board discussed evaluating the effectiveness of existing homeless services and potentially convening a summit with service providers. - Water Capital Projects: Long debate on funding the transmission line and treatment plant expansion. Options included rate increases, infrastructure surcharges for wholesale customers, updating the hydrology study, and renegotiating contracts. Staff was directed to bring a focused 3-5 year CIP for discussion. - Competing General Fund Priorities: Focus on improving pay for current employees over restoring cut positions. Consideration of a paramedic model for fire department to reduce costs. Sales tax revenue from Bass Pro and other growth expected to provide incremental funding. - Public Perception: Board discussed improving transparency through social media, citizen academy, video series, and board members explaining votes post-meeting. - Health Care Crisis: Suggested adding reimbursement concerns to federal lobbying list, seeking grants, and partnering with local health entities. - Competition with Northwest Arkansas: Proposed changing narrative to collaboration, leveraging workforce development programs, and celebrating Fort Smith's creative community. - Budget Discussion: Staff to present a base budget with new needs highlighted separately. Sales tax revenue trending slightly above projections but not yet sufficient for major expansions. - Police Facility and Training Center: Financing via franchise fees to be discussed at a July 28 study session. - Street Overlay: In-house paving program proposed to save millions annually from the street sales tax. Key Outcomes - Values, mission, and vision reaffirmed; staff directed to print and post them. - SWOT priorities identified: focus on water infrastructure, homelessness, competing general fund priorities, public perception, and healthcare. - Board directed staff to update the regional hydrology study and rate study to support water capital financing. - Board requested an evaluation of homeless services and a potential strategy session. - Board supported exploring a paramedic crew model for fire department and using franchise fees to finance a police training facility. - Board endorsed moving forward with an in-house street overlay program to reduce costs. - Staff to present a base budget with a separate list of new needs for board consideration. - Board agreed to recognize citizens for service, starting with Kyle Nail.

The Fort Smith 911 Governing Board met on June 25, 2026, to address the termination of a vendor contract for CAD/RMS software, approve a new vendor, review consolidation progress, consider additional expenses, and discuss proposed bylaws. The board took several votes and tabled the bylaws for further revision. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: Minutes from the previous meeting were approved by a voice vote (motion by Congress, second by Dington). - Financial Report: The board approved the financial report (motion by Herm, second by Clark). The report showed the budget was 7.1% under the projected balance for this time. The second-quarter state reimbursement had been received but not yet reflected. Encumbrances were primarily related to consolidation expenses. Discussion Items - Termination of ProPhoenix Contract and New Vendor Selection: The executive director reported that on February 26, 2026, a breach by vendor ProPhoenix was discovered, violating terms and FBIC security policy. Vendor access was revoked, and the Arkansas Crime Information Center (ACIC) recommended steps allowing ProPhoenix to continue only with additional compliance. The board was notified of a material breach in late April and the contract is being terminated. The city is seeking a full refund of the $1.2 million paid. A new proposal from Central Square for a unified CAD, mobile RMS, and jail management system was presented. The implementation cost is $379,272.46 (amended from an earlier incorrect figure), covering training, installation, and the first-year subscription. The request is for a 2026 budget amendment funded from the $2.3 million 911 fund, with reimbursement expected from any ProPhoenix settlement. Central Square scored equally with ProPhoenix in prior evaluations and offers a lower service fee ($198,000 with 2% annual increases vs. ProPhoenix's 5% increases). Implementation is expected in 6–18 months; current operations are unsupported and at risk (e.g., a recent fire station alerting failure). The board discussed legacy data migration, fire RMS compatibility, and support location. Central Square support is U.S.-based and familiar to the agency. - Consolidation Update: The executive director reported progress on consolidating the River Valley Communications Center (RVCC), including testing rural fire paging next week and tornado siren activation. Additional expenses were presented: Fortinet network hardware ($30,834.52), Microsoft Office software tenant/licenses ($10,219.05), NICE inform system updates ($1,632), and AT&T non-emergency line implementation ($1,500 one-time, $433.40/month). These expenses are reimbursable from the state's $400,000 consolidation grant. After previous approved expenses ($303,790.45) and today's requested expenses ($44,185.57 including the AT&T one-time cost), a remaining balance of about $52,023 is expected. - Bylaws Discussion and Tabling: Proposed bylaws for board governance were presented but the packet lacked final revisions (e.g., section 3.6 on the secretary role). An amendment requiring 30 business days' written notice for bylaw changes was noted. The board decided to table approval until the September meeting (motion by Baker, second by Hearn) to allow for finalized revisions. Key Outcomes - Budget Amendment Approved: Motion to increase the 2026 budget by $379,272.46 for Central Square implementation passed unanimously (8-0 with Judge Holtz absent). - Central Square Contract Approved: Motion to recommend that the state board of directors approve the contract with Central Square passed unanimously (8-0). - Consolidation Expenses Approved: Motion to approve the additional consolidation expenses totaling $44,185.57 (including $1,500 for AT&T lines) passed unanimously (8-0). - Bylaws Tabled: Motion to table approval of bylaws to the September meeting passed unanimously. - Next Meeting: Scheduled for Thursday, September 24, 2026, at 1:00 PM (location to be determined).

This study session covered four major items: review of the CDBG/HOME five-year consolidated plan, discussion of proposed legislation for hospital service closure notification, replacement of the ProPhoenix CAD RMS system due to a security breach, and a financial assistance agreement with the Fort Smith Housing Authority for Bailey Hill redevelopment. Additionally, the board scheduled a strategic workshop and a regular meeting agenda. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were made during the study session. Discussion Items 1. Review of Draft CDBG and HOME Five-Year Consolidated Plan (2026-2030) - Candace presented the draft consolidated plan, annual action plan, and citizen participation plan required by HUD. The review and comment period ended June 17, 2026, and the plan is to be submitted to HUD by July 10, 2026. Director Kemp asked about the waiting list for owner-occupied rehab assistance; Candace stated there is typically a two-month waiting period, not a long waiting list. Director Kemp also asked about nonprofit groups like World Changers; Candace responded that World Changers completed their work this week and no other groups have expressed interest. 2. Discussion Regarding Proposed Legislation on Community Notification of Hospital Services - Director Settle introduced the topic, prompted by Baptist Health's reduction of services (labor and delivery, cancer treatment) in Fort Smith. He proposed a 180-day notification period before closing or significantly reducing critical care services, citing similar legislation in California (120 days) and Maine (90 days). Representative Jay Richardson attended and discussed potential pushback (e.g., single-doctor departments leaving). Directors discussed the WARN Act (60 days, 50+ employees) as insufficient. Director Kemp suggested addressing insurance reimbursement rates as an upstream issue. Representative Richardson agreed to work on drafting legislation. Director Good noted the distinction between private businesses and hospitals with tax-exempt status, supporting the need for notification. 3. Discussion on ProPhoenix CAD RMS Mobile Replacement Solutions - Dr. Wes Milam explained that in February 2026, a breach by ProPhoenix violated the city's contract and FBI CJIS security policy. The city terminated the agreement and is seeking a refund of approximately $1.2 million. The 911 board will be asked to allocate funds from reserves ($2.3 million available) to contract with Central Square for a replacement system at a one-time cost of $380,000, which includes service/maintenance for four years and is less expensive than the ProPhoenix contract. Implementation timeline is 6–18 months, but may be shorter due to recent experience. Attorney Colby Rowe noted ProPhoenix has not responded to the breach notice; litigation could take years. The board expressed confidence in recovering funds. Director Christinica Cassavis asked about the timeline for a lawsuit; Rowe stated it's uncertain. Director Neil Martin confirmed the city's strong position on breach. 4. Discussion of Agreement with Fort Smith Housing Authority for Bailey Hill Redevelopment - The city donated the former Bailey Hill reservoir property to the Housing Authority in 2012. The Housing Authority now requests $1 million from the street tax fund for infrastructure (streets and drainage). Mitch Minnick presented details: 34 homes will be built (24 for families at or below 80% area median income, 10 for up to 120% AMI). Phase I (demolition) cost $780,000, funded by the Housing Authority ($436,000) and CDBG ($343,000). Phase II (infrastructure) will use the requested $1 million plus $139,000 CDBG and $341,000 Housing Authority funds. Homes will be sold at market rate with subsidies to buyers; homes will go on tax rolls. Director Neil Martin questioned the cost, the lack of similar assistance to other developers, and requested a breakdown of costs for South S Street versus new streets. Director Kemp supported the project but asked for clawback provisions to protect the city's investment. Director Settle suggested a deed restriction. The board decided to table the item to the regular meeting on August 18, 2026, to allow time for the Housing Authority to provide additional details and answer questions. Key Outcomes - Item 2 (CDBG Plan): Motion to place on the July 7 regular meeting agenda was made and seconded; no vote recorded but consensus to move forward. - Item 1 (Hospital Notification): No formal action taken; Representative Richardson will work on drafting legislation and return to the board. - Item 3 (CAD RMS Replacement): Motion to place on the July 7 regular meeting agenda (board approval of Central Square contract) was made and seconded. Dr. Milam will request 911 board approval for fund allocation. - Item 4 (Bailey Hill): Motion to schedule for regular meeting on August 18, 2026, was made and seconded. The Housing Authority will provide cost breakdowns, feasibility of clawback provisions, and other requested information before that meeting. - Strategic Workshop: Rescheduled to Friday, June 26, 2026, at 9:15 a.m. at Regions Bank Building (7th floor) to accommodate all board members. - Next Meeting: No study session on June 30; next regular meeting is July 7, 2026.

Note: The agenda and minutes were unavailable. The raw transcript begins by stating the meeting is on June 16, 2026, but the instructions specify this summary should use the date June 18, 2026. This discrepancy is noted. The Fort Smith City Board of Directors met on the evening of June 18, 2026 (per instruction) at City Hall. The meeting included an invocation, pledge of allegiance, roll call of all seven directors, and a lengthy citizens’ forum. The board addressed several ordinances and resolutions, notably adopting an amended injury leave policy (4-3), a drug‑free workplace policy (7-0), terminating a construction contract for the alleyway rehabilitation project (7-0), and approving a consent agenda with multiple items after tabling one item to a future study session. The meeting concluded with appointments to city boards and an executive session. Consent Calendar - Ordinance authorizing conveyance of real property to Raymond Fondron – Land donated in 2005 for a park that was never developed; parks commission and staff recommended return to donor. (Item 5A) - Resolution designating a portion of Towson Avenue as Bobby Crabtree Boulevard – Honoring Fort Smith boxer Bobby Crabtree. Public testimony highlighted his career (93 professional fights, 51 knockouts, 1995 WBF cruiserweight champion). Adopted. (Item 5B) - Revised resolution authorizing submission of a proposal for $13 million federal funding (Lake Fort Smith water transmission line) – Supported by the Roosevelt Group. (Item 5C) - Resolution approving an agreement with Adopt‑a‑Charger for electric vehicle charging stations – Grant‑funded; contractor responsible for maintenance, electricity, and eventual removal. (Item 5D) - Resolution approving an agreement with the Fort Smith Housing Authority for $1 million in infrastructure assistance (Bailey Hill redevelopment) – Tabled to a study session by a 4‑3 vote. (Item 5E) - Resolution authorizing an agreement for engineering services for the 2026 Master Street Plan – (Item 5F) - Resolution approving settlement agreement for easement acquisition (Lake Fort Smith water line) – (Item 5G) - Ordinance abandoning public access and utility easements – (Item 5H) - Ordinance declaring an exceptional situation and waiving competitive bidding for a submersible pump – Sole‑source justification provided. (Item 5I) - Resolution accepting change order for Creekmoor Park tennis court improvements – (Item 5J) All consent items except 5E passed. Director Martin voted “no” on item 5D (EV charging). Director Christina Kitsavis voted “no” on item 5I and abstained on item 5J. Public Comments & Testimony - Jimmy Harrison – Urged the board to support term limits (three four‑year terms maximum for board and mayor). - Sammy Jackson – Read a letter from State Senator Justin Boyd supporting the naming of Bobby Crabtree Boulevard; highlighted Crabtree’s boxing record and community ties. - Natalia Deer – Proposed a monthly downtown street fair with booths, artists, and talent shows; also requested safety gates at several railroad crossings and suggested spiritual deliverance services for homeless individuals. - Joe Elskin – Supported the e‑bike program (5,800 vouchers for low‑income residents) and investment in trails; urged the board to find a new contractor for the alleyway project to avoid Facebook complaints. - Shane McKinney – Reported over 3,000 petition signatures for changing the form of government; challenged directors who opposed placing it on the ballot. He noted that the petition drive will continue. - Carl Nevin – Asked the board to unanimously add the form‑of‑government question to the agenda. - Patrick McGuire – Questioned why Fort Smith was not receiving federal water infrastructure funds like other Arkansas cities. Mayor McGill noted the city had received $12 million from Senator Bozeman and was applying for more. - Kristen Conley (Program Director, Riverview Hope Campus) – Invited board members to tour Hope Campus and denied accusations of insurance fraud and drop‑offs. Stated they have helped 21 gain employment and 23 transition out of homelessness in 2026. - Eric Wideman – Spoke about political failures damaging community mental health (lack of leadership, transparency, accountability). - Sarah Harrison – Supported placing the form‑of‑government question on the ballot; reminded the board that as citizens they should sign the petition. - Jason Skirbitz – Expressed frustration with lack of transparency and accountability; said citizens are fed up. - Stephen Cox – Urged the board to proactively discuss data center regulations and supported trail investments; referenced the book Five Dysfunctions of a Team. - Dan Williams – Criticized the board for not knowing details of a $2.6 million payment to the Municipal League; called for stewardship and accountability. - Chris Cadelli – Asked the board to let citizens vote on the form of government; noted the petition has wide support. - Crystal Cadelli – Cited $800 million in consent decree work, the alleyway contractor firing, and EV charging station issues; opposed further private development subsidies. - Raymond Taylor – Advised the board to run the city like a business; cited the RV park sewer extension and the House of Dolls lawsuit as examples of poor financial decisions. - Joey McCutcheon – Accused the board of rigging votes and delaying tactics; demanded transparency and an internal audit of allegedly unconstitutional mayoral spending. - Stephen Sharum – Supported the current city administrator form of government; argued that an elected city attorney would lose institutional knowledge. - Jacqueline Hooper – Corrected a statement about the city budget ($167 million operating, not $300 million). - Mikaila Gaffney – Offered free leadership coaching to board members; questioned ego and service motive; raised the issue of $4 million lost in school districts due to students leaving. - Patrick Feit – Described his sister‑in‑law’s unsolved murder 40 years ago; asked the board to allocate funds for DNA testing and to address unsolved cases. - Jeannie Carroll – Urged the board to put the form‑of‑government question on the ballot immediately, not wait two weeks. Discussion Items - Injury Leave Policy (Item 1) – Proposed ordinance expanded benefits to all employees (not just uniformed). After debate, the board voted 6‑1 to strike the word “illness.” A subsequent motion to limit coverage to uniformed personnel failed 3‑4. The amended policy passed 4‑3 (Directors Kemp, Settle, Rego, Good in favor; George Kitsavis, Christina Kitsavis, Martin opposed). The policy provides up to 18 months of 100% pay for employees hospitalized due to work‑related injuries. - Drug‑Free Workplace Policy (Item 2) – Updated policies for pre‑employment screenings, medical marijuana card procedures, breathalyzer testing, and re‑application waiting periods. Passed 7‑0. - Alleyway Contract Termination (Item 3) – Staff recommended termination after the contractor (Western Millwright) struck a gas line twice, attempted a duct‑tape repair that leaked gas into a home, and buried it. AOG representative confirmed the repair bypassed safety valves. Multiple workmanship issues (roller‑coaster concrete, telephone poles poured without expansion joints) were cited. The board voted 7‑0 to terminate and pursue a surety claim. - Sewer Project Engineering Amendment (Item 4) – $69,772 amendment to Garver LLC for additional 1,800 linear feet of sewer pipe design to avoid future consent decree work. Passed 7‑0. Key Outcomes - Injury leave policy amended and adopted (4‑3) – Covers all employees for work‑related injuries requiring hospitalization; illness removed; uniformed‑only amendment failed. - Drug‑free workplace policy adopted (7‑0). - Alleyway contract terminated (7‑0); surety claim notice sent. - Sewer engineering amendment approved (7‑0). - Consent agenda approved (items 5A‑5J, with 5E tabled 4‑3 for study session; Director Martin voted no on 5D; Director Christina Kitsavis voted no on 5I, abstained on 5J). - City board appointments approved – Airport Commission: Zach Lefford, Eric Pendergrass; Community Development: Marcus Johnson; Housing Authority: Alex Sanchez; Municipal Employee Benevolent Fund: Bonnie Byers; Future Fort Smith: Bonner May Murphy; Historic District Commission: Jessica Blanzey. Next Steps: The Bailey Hill redevelopment funding (item 5E) will be discussed at a study session. The petition to change the form of government is expected to be placed on the November 2026 ballot pending further board action. The meeting adjourned to executive session.

The Fort Smith Parks Commission met on June 10, 2026, to discuss several agenda items including the return of donated parkland, project updates, a major grant-funded trail revision, and public concerns about park amenities and construction impacts. The meeting began with the approval of minutes from the previous meeting. Consent Calendar - Minutes Approval: The commission unanimously approved the minutes from the previous meeting as reviewed. Public Comments & Testimony - Keely Simpson (resident): Spoke about a May 15th event for people with disabilities held at John Bell Jr. Park. She expressed concerns about the lack of amenities (benches, tables, mud under pavilion) and safety issues (lack of fencing near road, seizure-inducing police lights, vandalism from vehicles doing donuts). She noted the park was named after an advocate for the disabled and urged improvements. She offered to seek community sponsorships for benches. Staff acknowledged the issues and offered solutions (asphalt millings for the pavilion floor, temporary bleachers, future CIP funding for picnic tables). - Liz Armstrong (resident): Expressed anger about the condition of Ranger Heritage Park during reconstruction of the pump house. She detailed that contractor debris (rocks, netting) was thrown onto landscaping she and her husband had donated (astro turf, trees, custom door worth over $3,000). She demanded accountability and better communication, stating she was not notified of the work. Staff responded that the custom door was safely stored at the city shop, and that the contractor (Ipson Stone) would be directed to clean up. Commissioners expressed regret and promised follow-up. Discussion Items - Conveyance of Rio Fondron Park: Staff presented a recommendation to return a 1.5-acre parcel (donated in 2005 with intent for a public park, but never developed) back to the Fondren family. The land is costly to maintain (2 hours mowing/weeding each time), is not used by the public, and the family has requested its return. Staff noted no deed restriction exists, but the original intent was documented. The commission discussed liability concerns (soil contamination) and agreed to recommend the Board of Directors approve the direct conveyance. A motion to recommend the return was made, seconded, and approved (no opposition noted). - Tennis Court/Pickleball Project Change Order: Staff reported an unforeseen $120,000 change order for the pickleball court project due to unsuitable soil requiring deep excavation (5-6 feet) and discovery of a clogged under-drain system. The work was completed as a field change. The change order will be presented to the Board for approval next week. Commissioners expressed sticker shock but acknowledged necessity for long-term durability. - Cisterna Park Chunk House Update: Project expected to finish by end of June or early July, ahead of the August estimate. Contractor used a tin roof during rain to keep water out. - Other Project Updates: Bid openings scheduled for Tillers Park parking lot and Riley Farm Park walking trail improvements. Riverfront skate and bike park shade (three cantilever structures) purchase order issued; colors to be selected later. - Bass Reeves Legacy Loop Revised Scope: Staff presented a revised scope for a $25 million federal grant (not a loop but a 5.5-mile spine connecting 30.2 miles of trails). Original 8.8-mile loop would have cost over $40 million; revised scope costs $29 million, with $4 million already allocated in CIP for trails. The revision was necessitated by cost overruns and hard deadlines. Construction anticipated to begin late 2029. Commissioners expressed support, noting the revised route is logical and leverages existing infrastructure. No public comment at the prior Board meeting. - Maintenance Update: Staff cited weather challenges for mowing, repairs to splash pad (lightning strike at MLK), motor short at Tillis, and brush hogging along river bank at Fort Smith Park improving river views and fishing access. Key Outcomes - Motion Approved: The commission voted unanimously to recommend that the Board of Directors convey the Rio Fondron Park property back to the Fondren family. The recommendation will be forwarded to city administration. - Change Order Acknowledged: The $120,000 change order for the pickleball court project will be submitted to the Board for approval; staff directed the work due to necessity. - Revised Grant Scope Endorsed: The commission received the Bass Reeves Legacy Loop revised scope and generally supported the spine approach. The project remains under staff coordination; next steps include final agreement with FHWA and construction planning. - John Bell Jr. Park Improvements: Staff committed to installing asphalt millings under the large pavilion and adding bleachers from existing stock. Picnic tables will be considered in future CIP planning. Parking stops to prevent vandalism have been purchased but not yet installed. - Ranger Heritage Park Cleanup: Staff will direct the contractor to remove debris from donated landscaping and ensure the custom door (safe at city shop) is returned or reincorporated. Future communication with donors will be emphasized.

This meeting featured presentations of the 2025 annual reports from the Fort Smith Police Department (FSPD) and the Fort Smith Fire Department (FSFD), an update on the Bass Reeves Legacy Loop grant, and a discussion on potential senior citizen water rate discounts. Board members also approved placing a study session on cemeteries on a future agenda. Discussion Items Fort Smith Police Department 2025 Annual Report Chief Danny Baker presented the report, highlighting an 11.8% decrease in overall Group A crime from 2024, down 29.97% from the five-year average and 32.88% from the ten-year average. Violent crime declined 10.6% (compared to national drop of 9.3%) and property crime dropped 13% (national 12.4%). There were seven homicides in 2025 (one traffic-related), with arrests in six. Aggravated assault fell from 614 to 557 incidents. Sexual assault rose slightly from 145 to 148 incidents. The department created an Office of Professional Standards and an Office of Public Relations. Employee retention remains a challenge: 82.5% reported having a mentor, but only 59.5% expected to still be with FSPD in six months (vs. 75.2% national average). Chief Baker answered questions about technology, response times, shell casings, fentanyl deaths, sexual assault prevention strategies, DWI trends, animal control citations (451 issued), staffing (authorized 160, currently 154 vs. FBI-recommended 190), and the cost of animal services ($1.7–$1.8 million annually). Several board members thanked Chief Baker and his team, with Director Martin noting Officer Newman was expected to go home that week. Fort Smith Fire Department 2025 Annual Report Fire Chief (name not specified in transcript) presented the annual report. In 2025, FSFD responded to 16,000 incidents (mostly medical calls), including 141 building fires and 59 vehicle fires. Estimated property saved was over 92%. The department faced budget cuts leading to the elimination of seven uniform positions by closing Pumper 11, though three captain positions were moved to Rescue 1, making all companies staffed with captain, driver, and firefighter. The department hired 15 new firefighters but still had 4 vacancies. A new Records Management System (RMS) was implemented. Training included over 13,000 hours and an in-house fire academy. Apparatus costs and build times have increased dramatically (e.g., a heavy rescue now estimated at over $2 million with a 48-50 month build time). Starting pay is $43,700 (based on 2,912 hours/year) vs. Fayetteville’s over $52,000; the chief is working on pay increase options. Board members asked about ISO rating impact, morale after cuts, recruitment challenges (50% fail rate on physical agility test), and the feasibility of different vehicle types for medical calls. Director Settle suggested revisiting police and fire budgets. No votes were taken on the report. Bass Reeves Legacy Loop – Grant Update and Revised Scope Dr. Sarah Dewster, Director of Parks and Recreation, presented an update. The city was awarded a nearly $25 million federal RAISE/BUILD grant in January 2025 for the Bass Reeves Legacy Loop. After internal review, significant cost overruns were identified: original estimate was $24.7 million, but actual revised estimate topped $41 million due to unaccounted costs for utility relocations, railroad crossings (17 originally), environmental studies, and price escalation. A revised scope was developed using the same grant name but reducing the route from a loop to a north-south spine along Old Greenwood Road, eliminating all railroad crossings, cutting the tunnel under Rogers Avenue, and reducing total paved miles by 3.3. The new estimated cost is $29.3 million, with the city covering the $4.4 million shortfall from the existing parks 1/8-cent sales tax fund (which cannot be used for other purposes). Dr. Dewster requested board direction to proceed with procurement for professional services, stressing this does not commit the city to accepting the grant; formal acceptance will come later. Board members discussed risks of cost overruns, the “start it, finish it” clause, and concerns about the name (still “loop” despite not being a loop). Director George Katsavis expressed skepticism about cost escalation based on past projects, while Vice Mayor Rego supported moving forward to leverage federal dollars. Director Christina Katsavis asked about communication to the public regarding the name. Director Kemp suggested considering a “senior rate plan strategy” instead of a hard discount. The consensus was to allow Dr. Dewster to proceed with the procurement process, with understanding that further board approval is needed before final grant acceptance. Senior Citizen Water Rate Freeze/Discount Discussion Jeff Dingman presented two options for the board: a rate freeze for customers aged 65+ at 2026 levels (for base rate and first usage tier) or a 10% discount off the first usage tier. Either option would only take effect upon future rate adjustments and would have no immediate revenue impact. Board members debated the fairness of age-based discounts versus income-based assistance (existing Project Concern program, which serves about 200% of poverty level). Director Good questioned shifting costs to other ratepayers and noted that many seniors may not need the discount. Director Martin supported continuing to promote Project Concern. Director Kemp suggested developing a “senior rate plan strategy” to ensure future rate increases do not overburden seniors. No motion was made; the discussion will continue at a later meeting. Key Outcomes - Direction to proceed with revised Bass Reeves Legacy Loop scope: The board directed Dr. Dewster to begin the procurement process for professional services, with the understanding that final acceptance of the $24.7 million grant will come before the board later. (No formal vote recorded; consensus indicated.) - Study session on cemeteries: A motion by Director (unclear which) to place a study session on cemetery maintenance on a future agenda was seconded and approved. - No action on senior water rate discount: The discussion was tabled with no motion made. - Withdrawal of motion on governmental change: A motion to place a resolution for formal change of government on the next agenda was withdrawn after noting the city attorney had not yet received an opinion from the Arkansas Attorney General's office.

The Fort Smith Planning Commission held its regular monthly meeting on June 9, 2026, at 11:30 AM (UTC). The commission reviewed 18 agenda items including plats, rezonings, master land use plan amendments, variances, and development plans. All votes were unanimous except one variance that passed 6-3. The meeting also included a brief board of zoning adjustment session. Consent Calendar - Item 1 – Final Plat, High Point at Kelly Ridge, Home Occupation License (8604 South Ridge Drive), Conditional Use (2201/2203 North 58), Development Plan (8716 Rogers Avenue): Approved with staff comments by a roll call vote of 8 in favor, 1 abstention (Commissioner Mendenhall). No public comments. Discussion Items - Items 2 & 3 – Master Land Use Plan Amendment and Rezoning at 705 Xavier Street: Request by Dana Rosa for Dungvoe to change from Industrial I-1 to Residential Multi-Family Medium Density (RM3) to allow two duplexes. A neighborhood meeting on June 1, 2026 had one attendee with no concerns. Staff recommended approval. The master plan amendment passed 9-0; the rezoning passed 9-0. - Item 4 – Variance at 4300 Johnson Street (RM3 zone): Request by Jose Sanchez for lot width reduction (60 ft to 50 ft) and side yard setback (7.5 ft to 1.5 ft) at 4237 Worsing Avenue, and lot width reduction at 4300 Johnson Street. Neighborhood meeting on June 2, 2026 had no attendees. Staff recommended approval contingent on limiting the new lot to one single-family dwelling. Passed 9-0. - Items 5–8 – Variance, MLUP Amendment, Rezoning, and Development Plan at 606 South 22nd Street: Request by Anthony Lerares for Gilbert Properties to build a professional office. Variance sought from street access requirements. Neighborhood meeting on May 28, 2026 had five attendees with no opposition. Public comment: Marcus Woodward (neighbor) expressed support. All four items passed 9-0. - Item 9 – Rezoning at 5300 South Zero Street and 5991 Grand Slam Loop: Request by Tyler Teague and Isaac Lee to change from PZD (Ordinance 21-23) to a new PZD with two character areas (A: heavier commercial, B: less intense). Neighborhood meeting on June 1, 2026 had one attendee with no objections. Staff supported. Passed 9-0. - Items 10–11 – Variances at 1320 Jacobs Avenue and 1708/1710 Jacobs Avenue: Both requests by Dana Rosa for Land Family Trust to allow lot splits for duplex construction. - Item 10 (1320 Jacobs): Variances for side yard setback (5 ft to 1.5 ft), street frontage (50 ft to 0 ft), and lot width (50 ft to 0 ft). Neighborhood meeting on June 3, 2026 had six attendees with no expressed opposition. Staff recommended conditions, including removal of existing ramp/sheds and walling off a door. Passed 6-3 (Commissioners Ludford, Wilson, Coleman, Hannah, Mendenhall, McCaffrey in favor; Taylor, Newton, Tyler opposed). - Item 11 (1708/1710 Jacobs): Variances for street frontage and lot width (50 ft to 0 ft). Neighborhood meeting on June 2, 2026 had no attendees. No existing structures; staff recommended conditions. Passed 9-0. - Items 12–13 – Variance and Development Plan at 5400 South 66th Street: Request by Brett Abbott for Stoddard Revocable Trust to build an office/warehouse. Variance from 30 ft to 10 ft security military compatibility buffer (adjacent to Ebbing Air National Guard Base). Airfield operations manager Kyle Loney approved with obstruction lights. Neighborhood meeting on May 26, 2026 had no attendees. Commissioner discussion: although staff consulted the military, the planning commission retains final authority. Variance passed 9-0; development plan passed 9-0. - Items 14–15 – Variances at 1919/2001 St. Francis Court and 1912/1916 Kathleen Trace: Request by Brett Abbott for St. Francis Crest Inc. for front yard setback reductions (30 ft to 17 ft on St. Francis Crest and 30 ft to 12 ft on Kathleen Trace) and a subdivision variance for double frontage lot driveway access. Neighborhood meeting on May 26, 2026 had nine attendees; questions about drainage were addressed. Public comment: Jim Craft (representing the architectural control committee) opposed, citing aesthetics and proximity to street. Applicant Daniel Cochran (would-be resident) clarified that the actual setback is 30 ft from the road due to easements, and houses in the neighborhood already have 30 ft setbacks. Variance passed 9-0; subdivision variance passed 9-0. - Items 16–18 – Variance, Rezoning, and Development Plan at 1716 North 6th Street and 1725 North 7th Street: Request by Brett Abbott for O. Martinez to add a 1,200 sq ft restaurant addition and an off-site parking lot. Variances from perimeter landscaping and collector road access. The parking lot was built without a permit; staff noted penalties would be applied. Neighborhood meeting on May 26, 2026 had no attendees. Variance passed 9-0; rezoning passed 9-0; development plan passed 9-0. Key Outcomes - All consent agenda items approved (8-1). - Items 2–9, 11–18 approved unanimously (9-0). - Item 10 (1320 Jacobs Ave) approved 6-3. - No appeals or further actions noted; decisions become final unless appealed to the City Board of Directors. - Meeting adjourned after all items.

The Fort Smith Board of Directors held its regular meeting on June 2, 2026, addressing a consent decree project, citizen petitions for a change in government, and several routine items. Public comments focused on infrastructure needs, transparency, and calls to place a strong-mayor government question on the November ballot. Consent Calendar - Approval of May 19, 2026 minutes: Approved unanimously. - Ordinance amending the 2019 Unified Development Ordinance (childcare facilities in residential zones): Passed 7-0 with emergency clause. - Private club license for Last Call on Garrison Avenue (1004 Garrison Ave.): Approved 6-0 (one abstention not noted). The license is for a 5 a.m. permit. - Appropriation ordinance distributing insurance proceeds ($92,000 total) to city departments: Approved 7-0. Public Comments & Testimony - Andy Postrick praised the city’s clean drinking water and recommended the book You’ll Pay for This on municipal finance. - Crystal Cadelli questioned Directors Rigo, Settle, Good, and Kemp on critical needs (public safety, water/sewer, streets, drainage, affordability). She criticized spending on a $6.4 million water slide at Parrot Island, called for a five‑year pause on park capital projects, and urged the board to let citizens vote on a change in government. - Chris Cadelli noted an audit meeting that was not a true audit and again asked the board to place the government change question on the November 26, 2026 ballot. He challenged Directors Rigo, Settle, and Good to reconsider their votes. - Daniel Williams urged the board to trust citizens and put the question on the ballot, mentioning a lack of transparency around $500,000 in undocumented spending at Parrot Island. - Jacqueline Hooper raised concerns about enforcement of court orders (protection orders) and criticized the board’s handling of the petition issue, calling for transparency and respect for citizens. - Jason Skirbitz expressed frustration with the board, stating citizens are showing up in greater numbers due to the board’s actions. - Shane McKinney confronted directors about their refusal to allow a vote on government change, asking “Why are you afraid of a vote?” He warned that each denial generates more volunteers for the petition effort. - Richard Morris urged civility and reminded the board of the Arkansas Citizen Participation in Government Act protecting citizens from intimidation by officials. - Joey McCutcheon declared the petition drive will succeed, criticized Director Settle for abstaining and delaying tactics, and noted that the Secretary of State referred the matter to the Attorney General’s office. He asked the board to get an independent legal opinion. - Kristen Kitchens raised issues about oil and gas wells in flood zones, alleging city officials failed to act, and threatened legal action. - Lavon Morton (CPA, audit committee member) clarified that the Parrot Island review was an agreed‑upon procedure, not a full audit, and found no fraud. He noted the final report is pending responses from ARM, and recommended the city start seeking a new park operator now. - Michaela Gaffney spoke about people losing jobs due to potential government change and urged leaders to consider those suffering (children without water, sex trafficking, etc.). Discussion Items - Item 4 – Mazard Water Reclamation Facility Improvements: Engineering contract with Garver LLC for $8,575,000 (fixed‑fee, 5.6‑6% of estimated $150 M construction cost). The project addresses the city’s largest sanitary sewer overflow (15 million gallons since Feb. 2022) as part of the consent decree with EPA/DEQ. Board discussed savings, timeline (completion by Dec. 31, 2028), and involvement of a future program manager. Public comments (Joey McCutcheon, Shane McKinney) questioned the cost and board’s qualifications but board expressed confidence. Approved 7-0. - Item 5 – Amendment to Half Associates agreement ($12,000 increase for easement and CCTV inspection): Approved 6-0. - Item 6 – Easement acquisitions for sewer utility project near Kelley Highway and N. 54th St. (37 tracts, $18,000 offers): Approved 7-0. - Item 7 – Consent Agenda: Contains three items: (A) Contract with Square One Enterprises for waterline improvements; (B) Bid acceptance for two service trucks; (C) Adoption of substance abuse testing policy for Fort Smith Transit. Director Christina Kitsavis pulled A and C for discussion. - Item 7A: Discussion centered on a complaint from Goodwin & Goodwin (third‑low bidder) alleging Square One’s bid was changed after opening. Engineering Director Todd Mitkey and City Attorney Jerry Canfield explained that the allegation was unfounded; Square One was the lowest responsive bidder. Directors voted: 6 in favor, 0 opposed, with Director Christina Kitsavis abstaining. - Item 7C: Substance abuse testing policy for transit to comply with Federal Transit Administration requirements. Director George Kitsavis asked about marijuana reclassification implications. Approved as part of consent agenda (with 7A separate). Key Outcomes - Approved all agenda items: Item 1 (UDO amendment) with emergency clause, Item 2 (private club license), Item 3 (insurance proceeds), Item 4 (Garver engineering contract), Item 5 (Half Associates amendment), Item 6 (easements), and consent agenda Items 7A/B/C (7A passed 6-0-1; 7B and 7C passed unanimously). - Board directed that quarterly reports on the Mazard project be provided to the board. - Strategic workshop scheduled: Friday, June 26, 2026, at 8:30 a.m., Regents Bank Building, 7th floor (called by directors Good, Kemp, Rigo, and Neil Moore). - Petition for change of government remains a contentious issue; several citizens urged the board to place it on the November 26, 2026 ballot. The board did not take action during this meeting. The matter is pending a legal opinion from the Arkansas Attorney General, as the Secretary of State referred it. - Audit follow‑up: Director Christina Kitsavis noted that the agreed‑upon procedures did not cover all her questions, specifically about an $8,000 missing check, and that the review is ongoing. - Farewell: Mayor recognized Jennifer Petrovic, outgoing mayor’s assistant. Meeting adjourned.

The Audit Advisory Committee (AAC) met on May 29, 2026 (per instruction; agenda and minutes list May 28, 2026) from 6:00 p.m. to 8:04 p.m. in Blue Lion Room 2, Fort Smith, AR. The primary agenda item was the review of the draft Agreed-Upon Procedures (AUP) report for Parrot Island (water park) conducted by Forvis Mazars. Committee members discussed findings, requested additional explanations, and outlined next steps for finalizing the report and making recommendations to the Board of Directors. Discussion Items - External Audit – Parrot Island AUP Results (Draft): David Coleman of Forvis Mazars presented the draft report covering procedures on cash receipts, cash disbursements, accounts payable, bank transfers, reporting compliance, and financial analytics. Key findings included: - Missing supporting details for two accounts receivable sub-ledgers (credit card and guest ledger). - Variances greater than $500 between daily revenue listings and financial statements; ARM attributed some to third-party ticket sales (e.g., Groupon) and timing differences. - Two cash receipts in the general ledger not traceable to bank statements (pending ARM explanation). - Three disbursements lacked supporting invoices; explanations still needed. - Multiple invoices paid 45+ days past due, with several improperly excluded from year-end accounts payable. - Bank transfers balanced but some amounts did not match supporting documentation (attributed to estimating payroll cash needs). - Reporting compliance: most reports met contractual deadlines, but the 2025 annual financial report (due 60 days after year-end) had not been provided; committee requested its inclusion. - Revenue per attendee showed monthly fluctuations (e.g., May: $52 vs. annual average $45); explanations pending. - Year-over-year expense comparison was skewed by a $246,000 river leak repair in 2024 that was later reclassified; committee requested clearer presentation. - Concession profitability could not be calculated because ARM does not track per-item food costs; committee expressed concern and recommended future tracking. - Round Table / Questions: Committee members raised specific concerns and recommendations: - $8,000 uncashed check from a school: discussed as a control issue; committee requested a formal explanation. - Need for monthly reconciliation of daily revenue to deposits. - Desired inclusion of season pass revenue separately in the report. - Request for accounts payable aging reports in future monthly packets. - Want detailed information on private event rentals, sponsor revenue, insurance coverage, and allocation of expenses between Fort Smith and home office. - Timely reporting of large unbudgeted items to the Board. Key Outcomes - New/Modified Procedures: Amanda Strange (Internal Audit Director) will draft revised procedures for Forvis Mazars to obtain: - ARM’s reconciliation of revenue variances. - Explanation of the $8,000 check incident. - Accounts payable processing policies. - Extended testing of timely reporting (including 2025 annual report). - Separate table for season pass revenue. - Clarification on insurance and large repairs (e.g., river leak, power surges). - Pending Information: Forvis Mazars will follow up with ARM to resolve all yellow- and purple-highlighted pending items (explanations and documents). - Final Report: Once procedures are completed and explanations received, the report will be finalized and presented to the AAC. The AAC will then recommend the report to the Board of Directors. - Next Meeting: The committee will decide whether to hold a separate AAC meeting or combine with the upcoming ACFR (Annual Comprehensive Financial Report) meeting in June 2026. - Recommendations to Board: The AAC plans to compile recommendations for future monthly reporting (e.g., AP aging, daily attendance with year-over-year comparison, itemized food/beverage costs, private event details, sponsor revenue, insurance details, and expense breakdown between local and home office). These recommendations may be advanced without waiting for the final audit report. Note: The agenda and minutes indicate the meeting took place on May 28, 2026. The user instruction specifies May 29, 2026; both dates are included for accuracy.