Public Meetings - Naperville, Illinois

The Naperville City Council met on January 20, 2026, at 7:00 PM in Council Chambers. The meeting included public comments on the IMEA contract extension and the new utility e-billing system, a public hearing for a dormant special service area, the approval of multiple bid awards and spending items, and the main item of the evening: a lengthy public hearing and council deliberation on the proposed Karis Critical Data Center at 1960 Lucent Lane. After extensive public testimony and council discussion, the council voted to deny the conditional use permit for the data center. Consent Calendar - Approved cash disbursements for December 2025 totaling $44,245,616.87. - Approved the regular City Council meeting minutes of December 16, 2025. - Approved the City Council meeting schedule for February, March, and April 2026. - Received the year-to-date budget report through December 31, 2025. - Approved an appointment to the Historic Preservation Commission. - Adopted the resolution removing a Building Review Board member for attendance violations. - Approved a single source procurement for a bucket truck body remount ($122,808.99). - Approved a cooperative procurement for a uniform rental program ($257,670 for two years). - Approved the award of Bid 25-298 for the Southwest Waterworks Generator Replacement ($320,500 plus 5% contingency). - Approved the award of Bid 25-312 for the North Elevated Water Tank Rehabilitation Project ($999,077 plus 3% contingency). - Approved Option Year 2 for Civil and Duct Work contract ($400,713.08). - Approved Option Year 2 for Fuel Site and Storage Tank Inspections ($225,000). - Approved Change Order 2 for South 40 Environmental Consultant Services ($151,180.31). - Approved Change Order 2 for Downtown Washington Street Bridge Improvements Phase III ($247,430). - Approved intergovernmental agreements for public safety radio talk groups with Will County and WESCOM. - Approved the 2026 Special Events Calendar as closed. - Accepted the record of Emergency Procurement 26-021 for water main winterization ($450,000) over written opposition from Scanlon Excavating & Concrete. - Accepted public underground improvements at Iron Gate Motor Condos Phase 2B and authorized reducing the surety. - Passed ordinances approving a conditional use for Sim Racing at 1911 Glacier Park Avenue, Unit 103, and adding a drive-through to the BP at 1532 North Aurora Road. - Passed an ordinance adding a definition for artisanal tequila and lowering the Late-Night Permit cap to 21. - Adopted the third amendment to the intergovernmental wastewater agreement with Warrenville. - Adopted the Resolution of Official Intent for Reimbursement of Capital Projects. - Adopted the resolution authorizing the 2026 Pace Paratransit Local Share Agreement for the Ride DuPage Program. Public Hearings - Conducted a public hearing for dormant Special Service Area No. 37 (Northwoods of Naperville). No public comment was received. Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance establishing SSA No. 37 for the February 3, 2026, meeting. Discussion Items - Karis Critical Data Center (25-1103F): The council considered a request for a conditional use permit, parking and wall height variances, and an Owner's Acknowledgement and Acceptance Agreement for a 36 MW data center on 40 acres at the former Lucent campus (1960 Lucent Lane). The petitioner's attorney, Russell Whitaker, detailed a revised plan reducing the IT load from 36 MW to 24 MW, reducing the building footprint from 244,000 sq ft to 145,000 sq ft, and reducing the number of required generators from 24 to 12 (plus 4 backup). He requested a deferral to the February 17, 2026, meeting to complete air dispersion modeling reflecting the new design. Approximately 47 public speakers were signed up, with a majority opposing the project. Opposition speakers (residents, physicians, and community groups like NEST) cited concerns about diesel emissions, public health risks (specifically from PM 2.5 and carcinogens), noise impacts, property value diminution, conflict with the city's comprehensive master plan, and strain on the grid. Supporters (union representatives, construction industry groups, and some residents) emphasized job creation (approximately 100,000 labor hours), tax revenue ($2-3 million annually), and the I-88 Tech Corridor's need for investment. Council members discussed the four conditional use standards and expressed concerns that the petitioner had not met the burden for standards 1 (public health & safety), 2 (property values), and 4 (compatibility with master plan). A motion by Mayor Wehrli to table the item to February 17 failed 3-6. A motion to deny the conditional use was then approved 6-1 with 2 abstentions. - Affordable Housing Update: Councilman Kelly requested an update on affordable housing policy progress. By consensus, council directed staff to bring a report to a future meeting on the Affordable Housing Incentive Program (AHIP) and the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance (IZO). Key Outcomes - Denied the Karis Critical Data Center conditional use permit, variances, and OAA (6-1, with Mayor Wehrli and Councilman Wilson abstaining). The vote was on a motion by Councilman White to deny the request. - Defeated a motion to table the data center item to February 17, 2026 (3-6). - Approved all six bid awards under Section M (South Operation Center Generator Replacement, Northwest Waterworks Improvements Phase III, 2026 Saybrook Water Main Improvements, Ogden Avenue Water Main Improvements Phase II, Electric GIS Utility Network Implementation, and Fuel Delivery Option Year 3) unanimously (9-0). - Approved the public hearing outcome for Special Service Area No. 37, directing staff to prepare an ordinance for the February 3, 2026, meeting. - Directed staff to bring a report on affordable housing (AHIP and IZO) at a future council meeting.

The Liquor Commission convened on January 8, 2026, welcomed two new commissioners, and conducted routine business including the approval of meeting minutes and 2026 dates. The agenda featured a recommendation to City Council regarding a license amendment for Barrel and Heritage to add tequila tastings and a request by Taste Buds Kitchen to increase the Class M license cap by one, which was tabled pending verification of proximity to a future daycare. The meeting concluded with the 2025 Annual Report, DUI and tobacco enforcement statistics, a discussion on updating the violation penalty matrix, and a general concept update. Consent Calendar - Meeting Minutes: The minutes from the previous meeting were reviewed; Douglas made the motion to approve, and McGurry seconded it. The motion passed unanimously. - 2026 Meeting Dates: The commission approved the official dates for the 2026 Liquor Commission meetings. Douglas made the motion to approve, and McGurry seconded it. The motion passed unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - John Beckman (Manager, Barrel and Heritage): Presented a rebranding from Taste in the Vine to Barrel and Heritage to better reflect the addition of bourbon and canned beer. He expressed a need to add tequila tastings to the license to maintain customer interest and pivot from declining wine sales, stating the business plans to offer "small batch" or harder-to-find specialty tequilas from Mexico (not big brands or private label) alongside mezcal. He emphasized that tastings will be conducted similarly to their bourbon program (3 ounces total) and that the program is intended to be complementary to wine and beer offerings. - Jackie Burton (Owner, Taste Buds Kitchen): Presented a request to increase the Cap on Class M recreation licenses by one for a new location at 620 North River Road. She described the business as a culinary entertainment venue (cooking classes, private events) similar to "Pinot's Palette" where alcohol is an optional supplement to food, not the focus. She expressed full support for responsible alcohol service, including ID verification and adherence to city and state guidelines, stating that without the ability to serve beer and wine, the business would face a competitive disadvantage. She clarified that alcohol is sold as a separate line item (not included in package deals) and service is restricted to adult-focused events and private functions. Discussion Items - License Amendment for Barrel and Heritage: Commissioners discussed the proposal to amend the liquor code to allow tequila tastings. The commission determined that while they could recommend the change, the authority to amend the text lies with the City Council. Douglas expressed full support for the rebranding and new signage. The commission voted unanimously to recommend the petition to the City Council. - Class M License Cap Increase (Taste Buds Kitchen): The commission deliberated Jackie Burton's request. Douglas raised a critical concern regarding the location's proximity to a new daycare being built directly across the parking lot. The commission noted that if the daycare is within 100 feet of the proposed location, an exception is required under the liquor code, which mandates notification to daycare operators. Commissioner Cherico questioned if the current enforcement matrix for tobacco violations is sufficient to deter repeat offenders, observing an upward trend in violations. The commission voted unanimously to direct staff to research violation matrices in other communities to determine if a code overhaul is necessary to address repeat offenses. - Tobacco Enforcement Statistics: Detective Crichton reported two violations in the first round of FY26 compliance checks, including one repeat offender. Commissioner Cherico noted that the current penalty matrix may have become a "cost of doing business" for some, prompting the motion to benchmark against other communities. - Liquor Concept Update: Staff provided updates on new concepts, noting that E9 Club (indoor golf) would acquire an existing Class M license, while other restaurants remained in early stages. Key Outcomes - Barrel and Heritage Recommendation: The commission voted unanimously to recommend the text amendment for tequila tastings to the City Council for a vote at the next meeting. (Douglas: Aye, De Joya: Aye, Gunser: Aye, McGurry: Aye, Chericho: Aye). - Taste Buds Kitchen Tabled: The request to increase the Class M license cap was tabled. Staff will verify the distance between the proposed location and the new daycare. If the distance is within 100 feet, an exception process will be initiated; otherwise, the item will return to the liquor commission agenda. Operating hours (9 a.m. to 9 p.m., event-based) and the restriction to beer and wine only were placed on the record. - Annual Report Received: The 2025 Liquor Commission Annual Report was received and adopted by unanimous vote. (Douglas: Aye, De Joya: Aye, Gunser: Aye, McGurry: Aye, Chericho: Aye). - Violation Matrix Review: The commission voted unanimously to direct staff to research violation matrices from benchmark communities to address the increase in repeat tobacco and alcohol violations. (Douglas: Aye, De Joya: Aye, Gunser: Aye, McGurry: Aye, Chericho: Aye). - Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned following the reports and motions.

The Planning and Zoning Commission convened on December 17, 2025, to consider a single case: DEV-0100-2025. The meeting addressed a request by Chima Developers to approve a conditional use for adding a quick-service restaurant drive-through lane (featuring a menu board and window) and a variance for a partial bypass lane to an existing BP gas station at 1532 North Aurora Road. Staff recommended approval based on site compatibility and reasonable design constraints, subject to a condition ensuring future stacking adequacy if a specific tenant is identified. The Commission deliberated on the lack of a finalized tenant and traffic implications before unanimously approving the request. Consent Calendar - Approved the minutes from the December 3, 2025, meeting without correction. - Approved the 2026 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting schedule. - Adjourned the meeting. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public signed up or spoke during the public forum or public hearing portions of the meeting. Discussion Items - DEV-0100-2025 (Chima Developers / BP Site): - Presentation: Staff reported the petitioner seeks to add a U-shaped drive-through lane with a partial 66-foot bypass lane (code requires 10 feet for the full length, requiring a variance). Staff noted the project is compatible with the B3 zoning and Land Use Master Plan, though the petitioner has not yet identified a final end-user. Staff recommended approval with a condition requiring future review if a user is identified that exceeds the proposed 12-space stacking capacity. - Petitioner Position (Dan Sultis, Chima Developers): Expressed a strong intent to secure a Dunkin' Donuts franchise as the primary tenant but confirmed no lease is currently signed. Stated the project aims to maximize site potential and is targeting a 2026 completion. Clarified that while they anticipate proceeding with construction upon approval, they intend to lock in a tenant before finalizing the build-out. Acknowledged that if a user like "Dutch Brothers" or "Seven Brew" (coffee shops with high traffic) were selected, the site might require further review. - Commissioner Longbaugh (Staff Consultation): Asked how often petitioners lack an end-user; staff responded this is rare but queuing data for similar uses (Dunkin'/Jimmy John) was provided in lieu. Asked about protections against high-traffic users like Dutch Brothers; staff explained a new condition will trigger a major change review by the PCC and City Council if the chosen user exceeds site stacking capacity. Commissioner Longbaugh expressed general support for the project but voiced concern regarding traffic studies during peak morning hours for Dunkin' Donuts, noting that while staff declined a formal study, they emphasized the need for caution. - Commissioner Zibel (Engineering Services): Explained that a formal traffic study was not requested due to the uncertainty of the final user and the unique nature of drive-throughs; staff would rely on comparative data from similar uses once a tenant is identified. - Commissioner Wright: Expressed support for the proposed conditions, noting that while the specific urgency for pre-approval was not driven by a vendor request, the review process serves as a necessary safeguard to verify stacking and traffic adequacy if a high-volume user is selected later. - Commissioner Nomadies: Asked if specific users would be flagged for closer scrutiny; staff responded that any proposed user would be reviewed for sufficiency, with no specific exclusions pre-identified. - Commissioner Castanoli: Asked if construction would proceed without a user; staff clarified the drive-through must be complete for occupancy, meaning the petitioner proceeds at their own risk if they build for a user deemed insufficient later, triggering a major change review. - Commissioner McDaniel: Expressed support for the specific application but raised a general inquiry regarding whether there are existing metrics or ratios in the code (post-2016 amendment) to monitor the density of automobile service stations in the Ogden corridor to prevent over-concentration. Staff agreed to investigate if such metrics exist in the 2016 text amendment. Key Outcomes - Motion Adopted: The Commission adopted findings of fact and recommended approval of DEV-0100-2025. - Approval Details: Grant of conditional use for an automobile service station in B3 zoning and variance for a partial bypass lane, subject to a condition requiring future review of stacking adequacy if a tenant requires more capacity than the proposed 12 spaces. - Vote Tally: Unanimous Approval (7-0). Roll call: Albubreaker (Yes), Customer (Yes), Longbaugh (Yes), McDaniels (Yes), Nomadies (Yes), Richelia (Yes), Robins (Yes), Wright (Yes). - Next Steps: Petitioner to accelerate lease discussions to target a 2026 project timeline. Staff to follow up with Commissioner McDaniel regarding the 2016 automobile service station metrics. Note: Student representative Zara Raman (Rama) was present and participated in the discussion but does not have voting capacity. Discrepancy Note: The transcript contains inconsistent name spellings for several commissioners and staff (e.g., "Albubreaker" vs. "Albueraker", "Longbaugh" vs. "Long Wall", "Nomadies" vs. "Nomadies", "Richlia" vs. "Richelia", "Rama" vs. "Raman", "Wright" vs. "Wright", "Castanoli" vs. "Castanoli" in one instance). The summary uses the most frequent or grammatically standard spelling found in the text context, but the original spellings varied throughout the session.

The final City Council meeting of 2025 honored the retirement of NCTV 17 Executive Director Elizabeth Braham Spencer, conducted a high-volume public forum featuring significant opposition to a proposed data center, and addressed procedural motions to schedule a future vote on the IMEA electric contract extension. The meeting concluded with a roll call vote to enter closed session regarding municipal utility operations. Consent Calendar - Approval of cash disbursements for November 1–30, 2025 ($58,069.30). - Approval of meeting minutes for December 2, 2025. - Approval of the 2026 meeting schedule (January, February, March). - Receipt of year-to-date budget report through November 30, 2025. - Receipt of renewable energy program update and proposed 2026 changes. - Approval of contract option year one for sanitary sewer CCTV inspection (National Power Rotting Corp, not to exceed $200,813.69). - Approval of contract option year one for SCADA maintenance (Advance Automation and Controls, not to exceed $194,180). - Approval of contract option year one for cast iron manhole covers (EJ USA, not to exceed $197,211.49). - Approval of contract option year one for excavation and utility repairs (Miller Pipeline LLC, Beish Excavating, and IHC Construction, not to exceed $488,410.15). - Approval of contract option year one for water distribution parts (Water Product Company, not to exceed $428,386.29). - Approval of contract option year two for residential water meter replacement (Calumet City Plumbing, not to exceed $250,430). - Approval of contract option year three for landscape design (Christie Weber and Company, not to exceed $470,000). - Approval of contract option year four for lift station force main inspection (RJN Group, not to exceed $179,000). - Approval of cooperative procurement for electric utility supplies (Wesco, not to exceed $750,000). - Approval of cooperative procurement for new police vehicles (Curry Motors Fleet, not to exceed $148,001). - Approval of cooperative procurement for in-ground structures (Wesco Incorporated, not to exceed $789,529). - Approval of cooperative procurement for ArcFlash rated apparel (Tyndale Enterprises, not to exceed $104,500). - Approval of change orders for electrical disconnect switches (Gray Bar) and LED lighting retrofit (Rags Electric). - Approval of change order for fire station renovations (Light Construction, not to exceed $40,082). - Approval of 2026 social service and opioid remediation grant allocations. - Acceptance of public water main and street/light improvements for Delta Sonic Car Wash, McDowell Point, and Ashwood Heights. - Passage of ordinance approving a wall sign variance for Charles Schwab (19 West Chicago Avenue). - Passage of ordinances for the 2026 property tax levy ($98,939 Special Service Area 23; $68,000 SSA 25; $93,111 SSA 30; $23,680 SSA 31; $20,026 SSA 34; $125,000 SSA 35; $1,259,718 SSA 36). - Passage of ordinances approving minor conditional use changes for Good Shepherd Lutheran Church and a home-to-office conversion (229 West Ogden Avenue). Public Comments & Testimony A total of 21 speakers signed up; the session was bifurcated with the first 30 minutes preceding the main agenda and the remainder following Item O1. Five written comments were also submitted. Opposition to Proposed Data Center (KARIS at 1960 Lucent Lane): - Rich Janner (Naperville resident/business owner) stated the movement against data centers is bipartisan and noted over 4,000 citizens have signed a petition. He argued the "four-way test" for conditional use has not been met regarding public safety and the burden of proof. - Dr. Sue J. Shah (Board-certified oncologist) expressed strong opposition to the 24 diesel generators, citing definitive science that diesel exhaust contains carcinogens linked to cancer, asthma, and heart disease. She argued Tier 4 generators do not eliminate these health risks and that the proposal fails to meet conditional use standard 2.1 regarding public health. - Dr. Aashim Babar (Board-certified cardiologist) countered the claim that highway traffic exposure is equivalent, arguing stationary generators pose a greater concentrated risk to cardiovascular health than moving traffic. He stated that while "risk does not equal hazard," placing generators near neighborhoods is an "unnecessary and irresponsible risk." - James Budd (Former data center builder) argued the pricing impact analysis submitted by KARIS is flawed because the comparable data centers in the study do not match the scale of the proposed 36-megawatt facility. He highlighted that KARIS holds over 70,000 gallons of diesel fuel, far exceeding local standards, and argued that generator noise and emissions pose risks that do not meet conditional use standards. - Sarah Baugh (Real estate professional) stated the proposal fails to prove home values will not decrease and conflicts with the I-88 corridor study's vision for a mixed-use innovation district. She argued the single-use industrial facility forecloses future higher-value development opportunities. - Dan Johnson (Civil engineer) opposed the project based on the comprehensive master plan, noting the site is designated for medium-density residential use. He stated the development conflicts with the adopted master plan criterion and that the developer failed to utilize a zoning option more harmonious with the area. - Clara Lambert (Naperville resident) cited global and local precedents (Aurora, Virginia, Oregon, Arizona) where data centers near neighborhoods were halted or rejected due to negative impacts. She urged the council to protect character and safety by voting no. - Nadim Mirza (Residents and anesthesiologist) argued the risks of diesel emissions outweigh the benefits, noting that even a small increase in utility bills could offset the projected tax revenue. He highlighted that the project only promises 50-60 permanent jobs, less than a single fast-food restaurant. - Edwin Cruz (Attorney) submitted a legal brief contending the petitioner fails to meet all four conditional use requirements. He emphasized that the property is designated medium-density residential in the master plan, directly conflicting with the industrial data center use. - Michael Thibodeau (Representing Democratic Socialists of America) opposed the proposal, citing an looming energy crisis in Illinois and potential economic bubble risks associated with AI data centers. - Steve Jarvis (Naperville resident) spoke emotionally about preserving the neighborhood for children and families, arguing the noise and 24-hour industrial activity are incompatible with the community spirit. - Joe Huss (Representing NEST) opposed the project while advocating for exploring alternatives to the IMEA contract, requesting the council vote to create a climate action plan similar to District 203. - Lori Melhart (Licensed clinical social worker) expressed concern regarding the mental health impacts of noise pollution and the burden of risk on residents. She noted that over 4,000 people have signed a petition and warned that the decision could impact future elections. - Joseph Lambert (Parent) opposed the proposal, warning that the data center would cause property values to plummet and bring industrial pollution to a residential area. - Maxwell Watkins (PhD Research Scientist) argued the increased strain on the electrical grid poses a danger to stability during extreme weather events and that the noise pollution from data centers is difficult to mitigate and harmful to health. - Ernest Oxenek (Naperville resident) objected to the proposal citing multi-phase impacts, high emissions from Tier 3/4 generators at full power, and the heat load added to the community. Opposition to Meeting Room Rental Cuts (Meeting Room 1): - John Brubaker argued that eliminating access to municipal center meetings for outside groups reduces availability compared to neighboring Aurora and noted that the manual billing process is no longer efficient. - Arlene Orr and Amy Friedman (Naperville Senior Task Force) expressed that continued cost-free access is vital for senior programming, including dementia support groups and Silver CPR, and that the city space provides legitimacy and protects seniors. - Jane Burke (Naperville Preservation Inc.) opposed the cuts, highlighting the central location and parking benefits of the municipal center and noting that alternative venues like the library are difficult to book. - Mary Ann Curtis (Neighborville resident) spoke on the necessity of coordinated accessibility for pedestrians and those with disabilities, criticizing snow management at bus stops. Discussion on IMEA Contract Extension: - Joe Huss and Daniel Bully presented conflicting views: Huss urged the council to begin an RFP process for cleaner, cheaper energy, while Bully argued that leaving IMEA (a non-profit) would expose the city to for-profit entities and higher costs, and that the current grid structure renders the transition technically difficult without reliability issues. Discussion Items - Awards and Recognitions: The Council honored Elizabeth Braham Spencer for 21 years of service as Executive Director of NCTV 17, presenting a proclamation and a gift related to the Ambassador Drive dedication. Spencer expressed gratitude for her journey and the community's trust. - Data Center Proposal Status: Council members discussed the timeline for the KARIS data center proposal, with City Staff indicating a target date of January 20, 2026, for the item to appear on the agenda. Councilman Holzer emphasized that the proposal conflicts with the comprehensive master plan's designation of the site as medium-density residential. - Meeting Room Rentals (Item O1): Following presentations from staff and speakers, Councilman Holzer made a motion to disapprove the discontinuation of meeting room rentals to outside groups, authorizing continued use at no charge for 2025 participants through June 30, 2026. The Council voted to direct staff to bring back a report on a potential compromise involving hosting meetings only on nights when the building is already staffed and charging market rates for other times. - IMEA Contract Extension: Following extensive speaker testimony and internal debate, Councilman Holzer requested a motion to place an item on the public agenda for an up-or-down vote on the IMEA contract extension (service beginning October 1, 2035). Council members sought to balance the need for a decision against the logistical challenges of a potential marathon meeting with the data center vote. Consensus was reached to direct staff to schedule the vote on the next available meeting where the data center is not being discussed. Key Outcomes - Consent Agenda: Approved unanimously (9-0). - Property Tax Levy for 2026: Passed (8-1; Councilman McBroom opposed). Adopted a total levy of $69,064,110. - Property Tax Abatement: Passed (8-1; Councilman McBroom opposed). Authorized an abatement of $8,500,181 from the total levy, resulting in a net 2025 levy of $60,563,929. - White Oak Drive Vacating & Subdivision Plats: Items J5 through J9 (vacating right-of-way and approving plats for 870 Prairie, 869 East Hillside, 901 East Hillside, and 930 Prairie) were all passed unanimously (9-0). - Street Lighting and Water Main Contracts: Items M1, M2 (lighting maintenance), and M3 (Water Main Improvements to Trine Construction) were approved unanimously (9-0). - Meeting Room Rentals (Item O1): The motion to direct staff to bring back a proposal for a compromise (limiting rentals to nights with existing staffing and charging market rates for others) passed 6-3. - Closed Session: Motion to enter closed session to discuss the operation of a municipal utility (IMEA contract) and load forecast studies passed 6-3. Note: The transcript indicates a discrepancy in the voting record for the 2026 tax levy and abatement items, where the roll call lists "No" for Councilman McBroom and "I" or mixed transcription for others, but the final tally is recorded as 8-1. The summary reflects the recorded tally.

The Southeast Area Commission (SECA) met on December 11, 2025, to reach a unified funding recommendation for Calendar Year 26 SECA grants. The session involved reviewing 86 applications, addressing concerns regarding late submission of commissioner data, and deliberating on specific high-profile projects. Commissioner Zakaria participated by phone, while student representatives offered input on potential full funding for specific small grants. The commission ultimately agreed on a unified allocation plan, approved the 2026 meeting schedule, and drafted the 2025 annual report. Consent Calendar - Motion to approve the November meeting minutes was unanimously passed. - Motion to approve the 2025 SECA Commission annual report draft was unanimously passed. - Motion to approve the 2026 meeting schedule was unanimously passed. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public submitted comments during the public forum. Discussion Items - Late Commissioner Data Submission: Commissioner Zards expressed strong opposition regarding the last-minute addition of an eighth commissioner's allocation data, questioning the validity of the figures and characterizing the late submission as disrespectful to the process. Multiple commissioners, including Gannon and Myers, agreed that a strict "drop dead date" for submissions is necessary to prevent late arrivals and ensure transparency. - Anonymity and Voting Process: Commissioner Prasad requested a transparent process to understand why specific applicants received zero funding from multiple commissioners, suggesting future open discussions after presentations. Staff clarified that while commissioners can individually contact colleagues to discuss votes, the standard procedure remains anonymous individual recommendation to facilitate unbiased decision-making by a volunteer board. - Zero Allocation Rule: The commission confirmed that an application receives a zero recommendation if a majority of the commissioners (five out of eight) vote zero. Six applications were zeroed out collectively based on this rule: Illinois Conservatory for the Arts (Application 1), Art Forum Installation Alley (Application 4), Indian Nurses Association (Application 40), Lizzie's Funds (Application 41), American Multi-Ethnic Commission (Application 52), and Indian Community Outreach Organization (Operation Support, Application 61). Commissioner Zards later confirmed a zero for the Tribals Foundation (Application 58) due to majority zeros. - Re-allocation of Undistributed Funds: Following the zeroing out of multiple applications, the commission discussed the need to reallocate funds previously withheld by commissioners who had recused themselves or assumed recusal would prevent reallocation. Commissioner Myers noted he had withheld $93,000 based on past practices, while Commissioner Zards had already reallocated funds he intended for zeroed-out items. The group agreed to re-examine all allocations to ensure the total recommended amount met the $1,200,737 budget. - Light Anemones (Application 36): Commissioner Zards advocated for fully funding the $91,400 request for the "Light Anemones" art installation, citing potential for significant tourism press, the unique interactive nature of the data collection for future city planning, and the low cost per expected visitor ($2-$3). In contrast, Commissioner Myers and others expressed concern about the disparity compared to other grants. The commission eventually reached consensus on a $65,000 allocation, stopping short of full funding but significantly increasing from the average. - India Day Parade (Application 61): Heavy debate occurred regarding the India Community Outreach Organization's request due to lack of communication, perceived inflated budget estimates (specifically $120,000 for fencing), and the organization's failure to attend presentations. Commissioner Myers and Zards expressed a lack of confidence in the organization's ability to manage city services, leading to the consensus to zero out the Operations request and maintain a low allocation for City Services. - Asian Heritage Fest (Application 59): Commissioner Zards noted this application received zero votes for operations due to the organization's failure to respond to commission inquiries regarding budget details and venue logistics, characterizing this as an "extremely bad mark." - Public Art Set-Aside: The commission agreed to designate a $15,000 set-aside from the remaining funds for future public art projects. Commissioner Myers proposed a policy whereby funds recovered from cancelled events (due to under-budgeting or cancellations) would be directed into this set-aside rather than returning to the general fund, to be discussed further in January. Key Outcomes - Unified Recommendation Approval: The commission unanimously approved the unified funding recommendation for Calendar Year 2026 SECA grants. - Budget Allocation: The final unified recommendation totals $1,200,737. Key allocations include: - Light Anemones: $65,000 (reduced from Zards' full funding request of $91,400). - Art Set-Aside: $15,000 designated for future public art. - Remaining Funds: Approximately $4,000 was allocated to the Last Fling City Services request as a final adjustment. - Zeroed Applications: Applications 1, 4, 40, 41, 52, 58, and the Operations component of Application 61 were recommended at $0. - Full Funding Adjustments: The commission agreed to fully fund the "Singing for Seniors" ($4,500), "Summer Place Theater" ($3,000), "Halloween at the Y" ($2,500), and the "Monarch Garden" (increased to $1,500 upon student suggestion). The "Neighbor Lights" and "Last Fling" operations received adjustments based on remaining funds. - Future Actions: The commission will discuss revising the application review process, implementing a strict submission deadline, and formalizing the policy for handling cancelled event funds (directing them to the set-aside) at a workshop or regular meeting in January 2026. - Next Meeting: The January 2026 meeting was tentatively scheduled, with a motion proposed to move the date from January 21 to January 28 to accommodate Commissioner Myers.

The Transportation Advisory Board convened for its final meeting of 2025 on December 4th, welcoming Council Liaison Josh McBroom and new student member Alexander Sokolowski. The meeting proceeded through the approval of minutes, the adoption of the 2026 meeting schedule, and the approval of the 2025 annual report. Discussion covered old and new business items, including updates on the 2050 road improvement plan, the bicycle and pedestrian plan progress, and the Council's recent approval of the e-bike ordinance. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: The Board unanimously approved the minutes from the September 4, 2025, meeting. - 2026 Meeting Schedule: The Board approved the proposed schedule for 2026, which excludes a January meeting due to the new year and includes a meeting during the traditional spring break week in April. - 2025 Annual Report: The Board unanimously approved the 2025 annual report, which summarized accomplishments such as parking restrictions and road improvements, noted challenges like board turnover, and outlined upcoming work including the bicycle and pedestrian plan. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public signed up to speak during the public forum or on the scheduled agenda items. Discussion Items - Police Report Update: Sergeant Muska reported that the Thanksgiving enforcement campaign resulted in 80 citations for seatbelt, speeding, and DUI violations. The Christmas campaign is scheduled to follow, focusing on the same issues. Additionally, educational material regarding the e-bike ordinance is being finalized for social media, newsletters, and local schools. - 2050 Road Improvement Plan: Staff noted that this plan was endorsed by City Council on November 18th following TAB's recommendation. Identified road and intersection capacity issues are being incorporated into the city's capital improvement program. - Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan: Staff provided updates on the collaboration with consultant Epstein and Sons International. Community engagement is one-third complete, with an interactive map receiving over 400 comments. Two new public events are scheduled for 2026 (January and April). Staff clarified that TAB will guide the plan process, but due to the Open Meetings Act, only two TAB members may attend the upcoming public open house at a time. - E-Bike Ordinance Update: Mr. Webb requested an update on the e-bike ordinance. Staff confirmed that City Council approved the ordinance on December 2nd with no changes. The ordinance supplements the Illinois Vehicle Code by imposing a 15 mph speed limit on all electric bikes on city and park district trails and banning Class 3 e-bikes (capable of 28 mph), aligning with DuPage County recommendations and the Park District's existing rules. Key Outcomes - Unanimous Approval: Minutes, 2026 schedule, and 2025 Annual Report were approved unanimously (7-0). - Unanimous Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned unanimously (7-0). - Directives: Staff to finalize e-bike educational materials for release post-new year. Staff to coordinate TAB member attendance schedules for the April 2026 public open house. - Status: The 2050 Road Improvement Plan is moving to the capital improvement program. The Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan is proceeding with feedback compilation, with preliminary recommendations expected in spring 2026.

The Planning and Zoning Commission convened on December 3, 2025, to address a single public hearing regarding a conditional use and parking variance for a new car racing simulator business. The Commission reviewed a proposal by Naperville SRLC to locate "SIM Racing" in Unit 103 of the High Grove Plaza shopping center. Following a staff presentation and the petitioner's opening remarks, the Commission deliberated on the consistency of the use with the B-2 zoning district and the sufficiency of the proposed parking arrangement. After clarifying operational details including the appointment-only model and community engagement plans, the Commission unanimously approved the request subject to specific conditions regarding the number of simulators and parking mitigation measures. The meeting concluded with the approval of previous minutes and adjournment. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: The Commission unanimously approved the minutes from the November 19, 2025, meeting without corrections. Public Comments & Testimony - Public Forum: No members of the public signed up to speak during the general public forum for issues not on the agenda. - Public Testimony for DEV-0081-2025: No members of the public signed up to testify specifically for or against the application. - Adjacent Business Support: Staff noted that the adjacent tenant, Extreme Dance Center, submitted a letter of support in the attachments for the proposed Sim Racing use and shared parking arrangement. Discussion Items - Staff Presentation (Brad Wiki): - Proposal: Petitioner Naperville SRLC seeks a conditional use for an amusement establishment (car racing simulators) and a parking variance (reducing requirement from 10 to 5 spaces per 1,000 sq ft) for a 4,500 sq ft unit. - Consistency: Staff found the use consistent with the B-2 district's intent for entertainment and the urban center land use designation. - Parking Analysis: The unit historically utilized 23 spaces (5 per 1,000 sq ft). Staff analysis of a shopping center parking survey showed Outlot C peaked at 52% capacity at 6 p.m. on a Wednesday. A survey from a comparable location in Algonquin, IL, showed a maximum of 17 spaces occupied at peak times. Staff recommended approval noting the appointment-only model reduces traffic. - Proposed Conditions: Limit simulators to 16 unless staff confirms no parking issues with an increase; require adequate measures for parking if needs cannot be met (e.g., limiting hours, adjusting operations, or creating overflow); ability to revoke variance for non-compliance. - Petitioner Presentation (Yana): - Business Model: Described the business as high-fidelity simulators that mimic real driving physics, weather, and car adjustments. Operations are appointment-only to manage capacity and noise (headphones). - Capacity: The Naperville location will feature 16 simulators and a lounge area with TVs for spectators. - Staffing: Managed primarily by one manager (Matt), with occasional support. - Community Impact: Expressed strong desire to partner with local schools, high schools, and the Naperville community for programs such as toy drives and coaching aspiring racers who cannot afford real-world racing. - Parking: Confirmed relationship with Extreme Dance Center for shared parking; noted that most drop-offs are quick and parking is rarely an issue. - Commissioner Deliberation: - Commissioner Long and Bar: Raised questions about left-hand driving simulations (clarified not currently available), competition formats (clarified no large crowds expected), and handicap parking accessibility (noted only one spot visible; staff confirmed it counts toward total but agreed to review code compliance). Expressed support for the concept. - Commissioner Wright: Inquired about simulator time slots (1-2 hours), potential wait times (petitioner noted patrons arrive on time), and staff size (1-2 people). Noted the reservation model alleviates parking concerns. - Commissioner McDaniel: Asked about age requirements (minimum is based on leg length, not age; cited a 6-7 year old operator); inquired about future kids' simulators (petitioner noted potential for 4 additional simulators within current parking allowance). Expressed enthusiasm and welcomed the business. - Commissioner Bansa and Namaste: Raised no comments or questions. - Commissioner Kiss: Echoed positive sentiments and noted potential partnerships with local entities like Iron Gate. Key Outcomes - Motion to Close Public Hearing: Carried unanimously. - Motion to Approve DEV-0081-2025: Commission unanimously adopted findings of fact and recommended approval of: 1. Conditional Use: For an amusement establishment in the B-2 zoning district at 1911 Glacier Park Avenue, Unit 103. 2. Parking Variance: To reduce off-street parking requirements from 10 to 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. - Roll Call Vote: All 7 present commissioners (Abu Baker, Bonzo, Casting, Long and Bar, McDaniel, Namaste, Rachaelia) voted "Aye/Agree." - Conditions Imposed: The approval is subject to the following: simulators are limited to 16 unless staff confirms parking is sufficient; the business must take adequate measures (including potentially limiting hours or building overflow parking) if parking needs exceed capacity; failure to comply may result in revocation. - Adjournment: The meeting was formally adjourned.

The Naperville City Council convened on December 2, 2025, to address public safety, transmission infrastructure, budget approvals, and legislative priorities. The meeting began with a moment of silence for a city contractor who tragically died while removing snow at the downtown train station. Councilman Wilson participated remotely. The agenda included public comments regarding gas power mandates, IMEA financial transparency, and electric bike regulations, followed by the approval of the 2026 annual budget and several infrastructure contracts. Consent Calendar - Approved the approval of budget workshop minutes (September 29, October 28, November 10, 2025) and regular meeting minutes (November 18, 2025). - Approved the city council schedule for December 2025, January, and February 2026. - Approved single-source procurements for Smart Works renewal ($137,185.68) and Electric service cure ($652,000.71). - Awarded bids for Bonames Woods lift station rehabilitation ($925,000 + 3% contingency) and River Mist Force Main rehabilitation ($419,750 + 5% contingency). - Approved option year extensions for various contracts including tree removal ($200,000), tree trimming ($241,160), fire alarm maintenance ($110,000), security services ($150,000), electrician services ($115,000), and maintenance contracts for street lights, Microsoft agreement, HVAC, and radio consultant services. - Approved the omnibus motion with comments on I-25 removed for further discussion. Public Comments & Testimony - Ashley Pennock (Resident/Hospitality Industry Veteran): Expressed strong support for gas-powered ranges in the restaurant industry, arguing that chefs prefer gas for temperature control and safety. Speaker stated that government mandates restricting gas could increase business entry barriers, raise operational costs, and ultimately pass expenses to consumers. Speaker referenced economic philosophers John Locke and Ayn Rand and economists Walter Williams and Thomas Sowell. - Greg Hubert (IMea board member/CleanEnergy Naperville co-founder): Expressed skepticism and concern regarding the lack of transparency in IMEA's proposed $50 million transmission projects. Speaker noted that financial projections, cost benefits, and risk assumptions were not publicly available, making it impossible for the public or council to weigh in on the opportunity costs compared to other investments like battery storage. - Ted Bellard (Resident): Expressed frustration regarding the lack of transparency and governance in the IMEA power sales contract and recent $50 million investment vote. Speaker argued that the public and council are denied access to pro forma financials due to FOIA exemptions, preventing informed representation or strategic oversight of ratepayer funds. - Dick Page (Resident): Expressed opposition to the ban on Class 3 e-bikes on trails, arguing that safety is not enhanced by banning specific bike classes when standard bicycles can travel at similar or higher speeds. Speaker suggested that posting the existing 15 mph speed limit on trails would be a more effective safety measure than class-based bans. - Randall Keys (Resident/Military Veteran): Expressed full support for the e-bike and e-scooter ordinance. Speaker offered volunteer services to help develop and deliver a safety curriculum and educational program for parents and children to ensure community safety. - Sam Intel (Resident): Expressed opposition to the proposed property tax levy increase for crisis and mental health staff. Speaker argued the need was overstated given existing police training levels and suggested other cities had successfully reduced budgets without raising taxes. - Tim Farrito (Resident): Expressed concern over the high volume of taxes embedded in retail gasoline, noting that federal and state taxes total approximately one dollar per gallon. Speaker attributed reduced gas volumes to CAFE standards rather than just EV rollouts. - Councilman McBroom: Voiced support for the e-bike ordinance citing concerns for children's safety, though initially misinformed about the specific restrictions on Class 3 bikes. - Councilman White: Expressed skepticism regarding the specific prohibition of Class 3 e-bikes on trails compared to standard bicycles, suggesting a speed limit enforcement approach might be more equitable. Discussion Items - IMEA Transmission Investments ($50M Proposal): Director Broth confirmed that IMEA proposed two 765 KV transmission lines where Naperville would own 3% at a cost of $50 million. Director Broth stated he has not yet seen a cost-benefit analysis and will reserve his vote until it becomes available. Councilmember Gibson noted that even with deliberation, Naperville holds only one weighted vote out of 32 on the IMEA board, limiting strategic control. Councilmember McBroom questioned the role of the council in substantive IMEA matters. Councilmember Kelly and Board Chair asked for a summary of Director Broth's findings to be shared with the council before the vote. - E-Bike Ordinance (Item I-24): Council discussed deviations from state law, specifically banning Class 3 e-bikes (28 mph) on multi-use paths. Chief Aries and City Attorney explained that while state law allows Class 3 on paths, the ban was enacted to ensure consistency with Park District and Forest Preserve rules (which already banned Class 3) to avoid rider confusion. Chief Aries noted that non-electric bikes can also exceed 20 mph. The final ordinance codifies state law but adds parental accountability for minors and bans Class 3 bikes on all city multi-use paths for consistency. - White Oak Drive Vacation (Item J-1): The public hearing to vacate a portion of White Oak Drive was continued to the December 16th meeting. - 2026 Annual Budget Adoption (Item J-3): The council passed the ordinance adopting the 2026 annual budget totaling $685,342,588. Discussion occurred regarding the tax levy increase for mental health staffing, with staff defending the need against public speaker concerns about fiscal prudence and inflation. - SCADA and OMS Platform (Item M-3): Council approved the $2.25 million award to Surveillant. Councilmember Gibson raised a concern regarding a previously awarded Department of Energy (DOE) 50% grant ($1.1 million) that was canceled in October. Director Groth confirmed that proceeding with the local funding does not jeopardize the city's appeal of the grant termination and that the project is critical for the aging grid infrastructure. - Legislative Priorities (Item O-1): Approved 2026 legislative priorities. Council asked for clarification on "monetized" body camera footage, with Chief Aries explaining the goal is to prevent social media entities from monetizing footage of incidents for profit rather than preventing individuals from accessing their own footage. Key Outcomes - Roll Call Vote on E-Bike Ordinance: Passed 9-0 (Gibson, Holthauer, Jane, Kelly, McBroom, Syed, White, Wilson, Worley). - Roll Call Vote on White Oak Drive Continuation: Passed 9-0, continuing the hearing to December 16, 2025. - Roll Call Vote on 2026 Budget: Passed 9-0, adopting the 2026 Annual Budget of $685,342,588. - Roll Call Vote on Special Events Grant Cap: Passed 6-3 (Syed, White, Wilson, Worley voted Nay), amending the cap to $2,510,000, but Councilman Syed, Wilson, and Worley voted against the measure (Note: Transcript indicates "Motion passes 63" likely meaning 6-3). - Roll Call Vote on Maple Brook Water Main: Passed 9-0 (J. Congden Sewer Service bid award). - Roll Call Vote on PVC Conduit Vendors: Passed 9-0 for the $1.75 million five-year RFQ. - Roll Call Vote on SCADA/OMS Platform: Passed 9-0 (Surveillant contract award). - Roll Call Vote on Rubber/Cold Shrink Products: Passed 9-0 (Option year contract extension). - Roll Call Vote on 2026 Legislative Priorities: Passed 9-0. - Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned successfully.

The Naperville Planning and Zoning Commission convened to conduct public hearings on three development requests: a variance for a historic summer kitchen/garage (DEV-0101-2025), a sign variance for Charles Schwab (DEV-0133-2025), and a conditional use approval for a CARES Critical Data Center (DEV-0057-2025). The meeting featured extensive public testimony, expert regulatory review, and detailed deliberation focusing on environmental impacts, compliance with municipal codes, and community stewardship. Consent Calendar - Approval of the minutes from the October 15, 2025, meeting. - Approval of the minutes from the November 5, 2025, meeting (with no corrections noted). Public Comments & Testimony - Community Health and Environmental Concerns: Multiple public speakers, including Dr. Austin Bobber on behalf of 25 physicians, expressed opposition to the data center project. Speakers positioned that meeting federal/EPA standards is insufficient for local health safety, citing risks from cumulative diesel emissions, lack of site-specific air dispersion modeling, and the existence of unregulated ultrafine particles and VOCs in diesel exhaust. One speaker noted that diesel exhaust is a known carcinogen with no safe threshold. - Reliance on Regulatory Agencies: Several speakers questioned whether the City should rely solely on the Illinois EPA (IEPA) to protect public health. Dr. Bobber and others argued that regulatory compliance is a minimum threshold and does not guarantee neighborhood-level safety, particularly regarding proximity to homes. - Procedural Objections: Ms. Sarah Bao and Mr. Bernie Weiler objected to the admission of a letter from Dr. Susan Buchanan, arguing it was relevant to the reopened expert testimony but was submitted late and could not be cross-examined. Legal counsel ruled the letter inadmissible as evidence during the limited cross-examination phase but allowed it to be read as public comment. - Technical Skepticism: Mr. James Butt challenged the petitioner's expert, Brian Goldman, regarding the lack of specific generator models, the distinction between expected (10 hours) versus allowed (50 hours) runtime, and the methodology used for air quality calculations. Mr. Butt positioned that the City should not approve a project based on unverifiable estimates. - Support for Approval: Mr. Max Watkins and Mr. Michael Redig expressed curiosity regarding local data and zoning standards, with Mr. Redig noting that existing air permits in Naperville for industrial facilities are typically located in industrial zones, unlike the current residential proximity of the proposed site. - Neighbor Specifics: Residents from Naper Commons and surrounding areas expressed concern over noise, light pollution, and the impact on property values. One speaker noted that current infrastructure at the adjacent Nokia site does not meet dark sky compliance. Discussion Items - DEV-0101-2025 (Summer Kitchen Variance): Staff and the petitioner supported the conversion of a historic summer kitchen into a garage, noting it preserves a historic structure while complying with setbacks and parking requirements. Commissioner Longenbach voiced strong support for saving the historic home. - DEV-0133-2025 (Charles Schwab Sign Variance): Staff supported the variance for a wall sign to improve wayfinding. The petitioner argued the sign is necessary due to customer confusion caused by the mid-block location and one-way traffic patterns. Commissioner McDaniel and Namas opposed the motion, but it passed 7-2. - DEV-0057-2025 (CARES Critical Data Center): - Expert Testimony Reopening: The Commission reopened the hearing to allow Mr. Brian Goldman (environmental engineer) to testify on air quality permitting and regulations under the Clean Air Act. He presented data indicating the facility would meet Illinois EPA standards using Tier 4 generators. - Community Impact vs. Compliance: Petitioner counsel Russ Whitaker emphasized that the project is a "minimum investment" of $250 million, consistent with the I-88 corridor's vision as a business district, and distinct from hyperscale facilities. He highlighted the "Stewardship Pledge," a set of enforceable commitments including a 50% reduction in project scale (from 72MW to 36MW), closed-loop cooling (zero water usage), and Tier 4 generators. - Noise and Emissions: Commissioners and staff discussed the sound study, which showed negligible increases in decibels at the nearest residence. Staff confirmed that the existing Nokia generators run without similar restrictions, whereas the new facility would have strict conditions. - Commissioner Deliberations: Commissioner Longenbach questioned the frequency of IEPA inspections and the validity of noise studies relative to existing I-88 traffic pollution. Commissioner Namas opposed the motion, arguing the proposal fails to adequately mitigate resource consumption and noise impacts for adjacent properties. Commissioner McDaniel questioned the industry secrecy regarding generator models but acknowledged the project as a step forward in technology. - Stewardship Pledge Refinement: Commissioners Wright and others proposed refining the "Stewardship Pledge" into a legally binding "Agreement" with enforceable conditions, specifically regarding the frequency of annual reporting (suggesting 5 years plus "upon request") and the definition of decommissioning and operational testing hours. Key Outcomes - DEV-0101-2025 (Summer Kitchen): Motion to adopt findings and approve the variance passed unanimously (9-0). The project is recommended for approval to exceed the 18-foot height limit for the accessory structure. - DEV-0133-2025 (Sign Variance): Motion to approve the sign variance passed 7-2. Commissioner McDaniel and Commissioner Namas voted "No." - DEV-0057-2025 (Data Center): Motion to adopt findings and recommend approval of the conditional use passed 7-2. The recommendation includes a variance to reduce parking requirements and increase the height of the equipment yard screen wall, subject to enforceable conditions. - Vote Tally: In favor: Becker, Bonzo, Costigliola, Longenbach, McDaniel, Rochelia, Robins. Against: Namas, Wright (Note: Transcript indicates Wright voted "Agree" in the roll call, but his comment block states he supports the motion; however, the final tally text says "7-2". Based on the specific roll call list: Becker (I agree), Bonzo (I agree), Costigliola (I agree), Longenbach (Agree), McDaniel (I agree), Namas (I disagree), Rochelia (Agree), Wright (Agree), Robins (Agree). This results in 9-0 in the roll call, but the transcript explicitly states "7-2" and Namas is listed as "I disagree". There is a discrepancy in the text between the roll call votes (9 "Agree") and the final count declaration (7-2). The summary reflects the explicit final declaration of 7-2 with Namas opposing). - Next Steps: The matter moves to City Council for final consideration with a positive recommendation from the PCC. - Minutes: Approved the minutes for October 15, 2025, and November 5, 2025. Note on Accuracy: The transcript contains a discrepancy regarding the final vote count for DEV-0057-2025. While the Commission Chair declared the motion carried with a "7-2" tally, the explicit roll call list shows nine commissioners voting "Agree" (Becker, Bonzo, Costigliola, Longenbach, McDaniel, Rochelia, Wright, Robins, and the Chair herself). Commissioners Namas and McDaniel are the only ones explicitly recorded as disagreeing in the specific question block, though McDaniel later says "I agree with the motion" in the final roll call. The summary prioritizes the Chair's explicit declaration of "7-2" while noting Namas's opposition.