Public Meetings - Nashua, New Hampshire

The Board of Alderman met on April 15, 2026, to discuss the fiscal year 2027 budget, approve several resolutions, and hear public comments on immigration enforcement and camping bans. Key outcomes included adoption of the police contract, a resolution on immigration transparency, and a tax increment financing district expansion. Consent Calendar - Approved a three-year renewal contract for Citrix Universal Hybrid Multi-Cloud with Interest Systems LLC, amount not to exceed $40,500. (14-0 roll call) - Approved change order 2 for the 2025 CIPP lining of sewer interceptors with National Water Main Cleaning Company, amount not to exceed $3,393,909. (14-0 roll call) - Accepted minutes of the October 28, 2025, Board of Alderman meeting. - Confirmed appointments to Cultural Connections Committee, Arts Commission, and Planning Board. Public Comments & Testimony - Tory Markowitz: Expressed support for repealing the camping ban ordinance (not on action agenda). - Marilyn Kelly: Supported resolution R-26-016 regarding immigration enforcement transparency, sharing personal stories of fear in the community. - Jamika Lewis: Supported R-26-016, detailing the detention of a long-time Nashua resident (55 years in the U.S., 25 in Nashua) by ICE, urging transparency and accountability. - Faith Earritz: Supported R-26-016, though preferred a resolution refusing cooperation with federal enforcement. - Fred D. Boom: Opposed the police contract (R-26-017) as exceeding the mayor's 3% budget guidance, calling ICE a "Gestapo organization." - Katie Lamar (owner of Grave Troll Games): Requested changes to pawnbroker/secondhand dealer laws, citing 30-day hold requirements as harmful to her business. - Justin Gerstenfeld: Criticized aldermen for not researching public information before meetings, especially regarding the resource center. - Bob Keating: Urged support for ordinances repealing camping and RV bans on public property, noting the warming station closes April 15 and 50-60 people could be affected. Discussion Items - Mayor's Budget Presentation: Mayor Donchess introduced the FY27 budget, noting fixed costs (healthcare up 13%, insurance up 20%, electricity, school busing, special ed, landfill, body cameras) totaling $13M. The initial tax rate increase was 9%; the proposed budget reduces it below 8%. Cuts include: no full implementation of unaffiliated employee salary schedule (saves $400-500K), delaying fire training officers to mid-year, reducing SURF to $2M, and cutting school department by additional 0.5%. - Police Contract (R-26-017): Alderman Dowd moved final passage, emphasizing the need to retain officers (13 short). Alderman Lopez expressed support despite disagreements with police commissioners. Alderman Tebow clarified the budget increase is about 4%, not the contract percentage. Passed 14-0. - Immigration Resolution (R-26-016): Alderwoman Kelly read stories of ICE detentions, including a child present. Alderman Sullivan and Johnson voted no. Passed 12-2. - Tax Increment Financing District (O-26-003): Alderman Sullivan opposed, arguing two-thirds of revenue goes to TIFF rather than general fund needs (DPW garage, fire station, library, resource center). Alderman Lopez requested a financial report on TIFFs and potential redirection of surplus. Alderman Clee supported, noting affordable units in NIMCO (20%). Passed 10-4. - Resignation of Alderman Chess: Alderman Chess announced his resignation, citing inability to balance family and alderman duties. Colleagues expressed regret. - Camping Ban Repeal (First Reading): O-26-004 and O-26-005 were introduced to repeal camping and RV bans. Referred to Infrastructure and Personnel Administrative Affairs committees. Key Outcomes - Approvals: R-26-014 (School Street TIF amendment) passed 13-1; R-26-016 (immigration enforcement transparency) passed 12-2; R-26-017 (police contract) passed 14-0; O-26-003 (TIF district expansion) passed 10-4. - Next Steps: Budget review by Budget Committee; public hearing on resource center bond April 15; committee meetings scheduled. - Other: Alderman Chess's resignation effective after meeting. Financial report on TIFFs to be provided.

The Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) met on April 15, 2026, with Chair Jamon Kara presiding, Vice Chair Josh Neely, members JP Boucher, Robert Shaw, Steve Lionel, and alternate Joseph Potri. The board heard five applications for special exceptions and variances, and addressed one postponement. All cases were approved unanimously. Postponement - 19 Vista Way was postponed to the June 9, 2026 meeting. Case 1: 36 Roy Street – Special Exception for Mudroom Addition - Applicants: Edward and Hannah Persivali requested a special exception (Land Use Code §190-112) to work in the 75-foot prime wetland buffer of Salmon Brook to remove an existing deck and construct an attached 8x12 mudroom. The project is in the RA zone, Ward 6. - Public Comments: Three letters of support from neighbors Diane Fontas, Janet Veluc, and Elizabeth & Joshua Zellers were read into the record. No opposition. - Board Discussion: Members noted the home is already in the buffer, the area is disturbed, and the Conservation Commission had no objection. The proposal was deemed straightforward and reasonable. - Outcome: Motion to approve the special exception, with the Conservation Commission's two stipulations attached. Approved unanimously. Case 2: 6 White Avenue – Variance for Two-Family Residential Building - Applicant: Douglas Deschard requested a variance from Land Use Code §190-16, Table 16-3 for minimum land area (5,834 sq ft existing vs. 6,970 sq ft required) to remove an existing garage and construct a two-family residential building. The property is in the RC zone, Ward 4. The same variance was approved by the ZBA on July 14, 2020, but had expired. - Public Comments: None. - Board Discussion: Members noted the existing six garages are out of character for the neighborhood, that the proposal adds needed housing, and conditions have not changed since 2020. - Outcome: Motion to approve the variance. Approved unanimously. Case 3: 10 Williams Circle – Special Exception for Major Home Occupation (STEM Tutoring) - Applicants: Nimrit Argawa and Surabi Sharma requested a special exception (Land Use Code §190-47B) to operate an in-home STEM tutoring business with 3–4 students per session, one hour per session, three days a week, no signage, and no employees. The property is in the FUOD zone, Ward 5. Member Robert Shaw recused himself; alternate Joseph Potri voted. - Public Comments: A letter from Denise Amigo expressed concerns about traffic, noise, and precedent. Neighbor and abutter Rob Shaw (14 Sweet Williams Circle) spoke in favor of the application but stressed the need to prevent scope creep. - Board Discussion: Members agreed the use was limited and low-impact, but emphasized that any expansion would require a new application. The motion included a condition that the applicant maintain the specified load level. - Outcome: Motion to approve the special exception, with the condition that the applicant must return to the board for any increase in sessions, students, or days. Approved unanimously. Case 4: 22 Pond Street – Use Variance for Dog Daycare - Applicants: Joseph Boise and Brianna Mastrioli requested a use variance (Land Use Code §190-15, Table 15-1) to operate a dog daycare in an existing building. The business would be completely indoor, no exterior changes, with controlled drop-off/pick-up, temperament testing, and a dumpster for waste. The property is in the D3/MU zone, Ward 7. - Public Comments: None. - Board Discussion: Members noted the mixed-use area, the applicant's experience, and that the use would be unobtrusive. The building owner retains two-thirds of the space. - Outcome: Motion to approve the variance. Approved unanimously. Case 5: Kingston Drive – Variance for Garage Setback - Applicants: Abdel Aziz and Twabi Hadouche requested a variance (Land Use Code §190-16, Table 16-3) to encroach 5 feet into the required 10-foot right side yard setback to construct an attached 20x20 garage. The property is in the RA zone, Ward 6. - Public Comments: A letter of support from abutter Peter Lucier (6 Kingston Avenue) was read. No opposition. - Board Discussion: Members noted the abutter's support, that other homes in the neighborhood have similar garages, and that the applicant is proposing a narrower garage (20 ft) to minimize encroachment. - Outcome: Motion to approve the variance. Approved unanimously. Case 6: 149 Shore Drive – Variance for Deck into Rear Yard Setback - Applicant: Colleen Brady Revocable Trust (represented by Paul Chisholm) requested a variance (Land Use Code §190-16, Table 16-3) to encroach approximately 12 feet into the 30-foot required rear yard setback to construct an attached 12x21 deck. The property is in the R9 zone, Ward 5, in a conservation subdivision. - Public Comments: Letters of support from neighbors Douglas & Marie Kutchen (151 Shore Drive) and the owner of 147 Shore Drive. No opposition. - Board Discussion: The deck is needed due to a 10-foot grade drop (if lower, it would be allowed by right). The rear yard abuts open space owned by the city, with a thick vegetated buffer. The board found no impact on neighbors and supported aging in place. - Outcome: Motion to approve the variance. Approved unanimously. Case 7: 78 Amherst Street / 3–13 Putnam Street – Variance for Lot Consolidation and Density - Applicant: Family Realty Investments LLC (represented by attorney) requested a variance (Land Use Code §190-16, Table 16-3) to allow 10 multifamily units on 29,045 sq ft (62,228 sq ft required) after consolidating lots 83 and 85. The proposal is to demolish an existing single-family home and build two duplexes (4 units) identical to the three existing duplexes on the site. Six units currently exist. The property is in the RB zone, Ward 2. - Public Comments: Gina Jensen, a resident of 3 Putnam Street, expressed concerns about the proximity of new buildings to her unit, parking space allocation, asbestos during demolition, and lack of communication from the developer. She supported the project but asked for more green space and preservation of her two parking spots. The applicant's attorney responded that the client will meet with neighbors, parking will be increased to 20 spaces (no change to existing spots), and the deck sizes can be reduced for more clearance. Further details will be reviewed at the Planning Board. - Board Discussion: Members noted the existing building is an eyesore, the project adds needed housing, removes a driveway from busy Amherst Street, and creates a consistent look. The density is consistent with the neighborhood. - Outcome: Motion to approve the variance. Approved unanimously. Key Outcomes - Votes: All five applications were approved unanimously (5-0, with one recusal for Case 3). - Next Steps: The 30-day appeal window was noted for each approved case. The applicant for Case 7 will need to go through site plan approval at the Planning Board. - Minutes: The minutes of the March 24, 2026 meeting were approved unanimously. - Adjournment: The meeting adjourned at approximately 7:57 PM.

The Finance Committee of the Nashua Board of Aldermen convened on April 13, 2026, with Mayor Johnchis presiding and five members present. The committee unanimously approved a series of contracts for city equipment, park infrastructure, and environmental management. Approved Contracts and Expenditures Pontoon Boat for Police Dive Team The committee approved the purchase of a 2026 Barletta ARIA A24F pontoon boat from Irwin Marine for $126,989. Assistant Fleet Supervisor Kevin Rack stated that the boat, funded through the Police Department Capital Outlay Improvements fund, will replace a 2001 model and is intended for use by the police dive team with specialty equipment. Rotary Pool Design Engineering An $85,700 contract for engineering services was approved with the Turner Group to design a complete replacement of the Rotary Pool, which was built in 1973. Parks Superintendent Brian Conell stated the existing pool is "close to failure." The plan is to keep the pool operating through the 2026 summer season, begin construction in the fall, and have the new pool open for the following swim season. Alderman Sullivan inquired about the scope of the work, and Conell confirmed it would be a complete redesign. Alderman Will Share expressed hope that the construction timeline would be successful. Walnut Street Oval Intersection Final Design The committee approved a $256,168.25 amendment to the engineering services agreement with Hoyle Tanner and Associates to complete the final design for the Walnut Street Oval Intersection Project. City Engineer Dan Hudson noted that the target bid advertisement date is January 2027, with construction primarily in summer and fall 2027, and full completion anticipated by spring 2028. In response to a question from Alderman Sullivan, Hudson provided an update on the related street conversion projects, noting that the reversal of West Pearl Street and making Factory Street two-way is out to bid, while the plans for the Water Street corridor remain under review. Aquatic Invasive Species Control A $161,580 contract was awarded to Solitude Lake Management for the control of aquatic invasive species in the Nashua River, Mill Pond, and Canal. Sustainability Manager Deb Chisholm stated that the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (DES) will reimburse up to 50% of the cost, reducing the city's net expenditure. Alderman Clee confirmed the funding structure on the floor. Alderman Sullivan asked whether the city takes other preventative measures, such as boat inspections; Chisholm responded that the city currently relies on public requests rather than a formal volunteer inspection program. A separate, smaller contract for monthly monitoring and herbicide application in Sandy Pond was also noted. Record of Expenditures The committee unanimously approved the record of expenditures for the period from March 27, 2026, through April 9, 2026, certifying compliance with the city charter and ordinances. Key Outcomes - All four major contracts and the record of expenditures were approved unanimously by the committee. - An emergency purchase order from the purchasing manager was accepted and placed on file without objection. - The meeting adjourned at 7:14 PM following a motion by Alderwoman Clee. - In her closing remarks, Alderwoman Clee shared a positive anecdote about young women from Lowell, Massachusetts who chose to dine in Nashua on a Sunday evening, highlighting the city's appeal as a dining and entertainment destination.

The Ad Hoc Joint Mayoral Board of Alderman Capital and Debt Committee convened on April 10, 2026, at 7:00 PM (meeting adjourned at 9:05 PM) with seven members present. The committee received presentations from the Nashua Police Department and the Nashua Public Library regarding major capital improvement projects. Discussions focused on funding, design timelines, and safety concerns. Police Department Presentation - Parking Lot Renovation: The project, on the capital improvement list since 2017, aims to address drainage issues, traffic flow, and pedestrian access. The estimated cost is $1.5 million. A meeting with consultant VHB is scheduled for May 1, 2026, to review design concepts. The parking lot has not been repaved since 1979. - Detention Facility Renovation: The facility, designed in 1977 with minimal upgrades, presents safety and liability risks. The estimated cost is $3 million. The department has researched other agencies and met with architects specializing in detention facilities. The project is included in the multi-year capital plan, with initial design funding in the upcoming budget. Speaker positions: Alderman Dowd emphasized the need for urgent action due to officer safety; Alderman Kelly asked about electric vehicle infrastructure for the parking lot; Alderman Clee noted prior concerns and asked about CALEA recommendations. Library Presentation - Building Renovation and Addition: The library director presented a $45 million project to renovate and add to the existing building, based on a feasibility study. The building systems (HVAC, windows, fire panel) are past their service life, and there are life safety and accessibility deficiencies. The next design phase is estimated at $3.4 million. A joint special committee of library trustees and the Infrastructure Committee is forming. - Plaza Renovation: A fully designed $4.5 million project funded by ARPA and congressionally directed spending. The plaza has safety hazards (trip hazards, poor lighting, deteriorating concrete). The committee discussed timing: Director Sullivan recommended holding the plaza project until the building renovation design is complete to avoid conflicts. Alderman Dowd expressed concerns about losing federal funding if not spent quickly. Alderman Kelly asked about deadlines for the committed funds. Key Outcomes - No formal votes were taken on the projects; the presentations were for informational purposes. - The committee acknowledged the need for further design work and funding prioritization. - The meeting adjourned unanimously at 9:05 PM.

This special meeting of the Nashua Board of Aldermen was held on April 10, 2026, at 7:01 PM in the Aldermanic Chamber to discuss the proposed purchase of 14 Mulberry Street for a resource center and transitional housing, and to introduce related resolutions. The meeting included an overview from the Mayor, a presentation from the Director of Public Health and Community Services, and extensive questions from aldermen regarding the property, costs, tenant impacts, and due diligence. No votes were taken on the resolutions; they were assigned to committees and a public hearing was scheduled. Discussion Items - Mayor’s Overview: Mayor Doncius reported that the property at 14 Mulberry Street became available and was identified by Director Bagley as suitable for a resource center. The city negotiated a purchase and sale agreement for $730,000, subject to Board approval, with a closing date of April 30, 2026. The Mayor noted the need for a public hearing and committee review. - Director Bagley’s Presentation: Bobby Bagley, Director of Public Health and Community Services, described the property as approximately 3,000 square feet over three floors, suitable for a resource center with office space for community partners, laundry, showers, and transitional housing. She stated that the property would also serve as a warming station. The city has already allocated $300,000 for the resource center and has $1.2 million in congressional funding (from a 2024 request for $3 million) that could be used for the project, pending bureaucratic steps. - Alderman Questions on Inspection and Due Diligence: Alderman Johnson expressed concern that the city waived a home inspection, noting the property was built in 1868 and renovated in 1959. She argued that the board was being asked to vote sight unseen and that the $900,000 bond might be insufficient. She requested to see the business plan. Director Cummings explained that the city’s fire marshal and building inspector had walked through the property and gave positive anecdotal feedback. He committed to conducting due diligence, including sewer scope, using some of the bond funds, and noted that the board could tour the property with proper public notice. - Tenant Impact: Alderman Clemens and Alderman Semit raised concerns about the three current month-to-month renters. Director Cummings and Housing Services Officer Latanya Musioli stated that the city would work cooperatively to find them housing, and that one tenant already had an appointment to seek housing assistance. Alderman Clemens obtained a commitment from Director Cummings to do everything possible to rehouse tenants before construction begins. - Cost and Timeline: Alderman O'Brien questioned whether the $900,000 bond would cover required sprinkler upgrades. Director Cummings acknowledged that additional appropriation would be needed after design. Alderman Clemens asked about total project cost; Director Cummings declined to speculate but promised a report in May. Alderman Morgan noted that the $1.2 million congressional funding is contingent on the property being used for the resource center. Alderman Klee warned against conducting a walkthrough that could create a quorum violation, citing past legal issues. - Support for the Project: Several aldermen expressed support for the strategic vision, including Alderman Thibault, Alderman Kelly, and Alderman Clemens. They noted the property’s proximity to the public health department, the ability to offer transitional housing (unlike the alternative trailer plan), and the need for speed. Alderman Clemens stated that the alternative trailer plan would have cost over $2 million and provided less functionality. - Alternative Plan Comparison: The Mayor and Director Cummings compared the proposed purchase to the previously considered option of relocating portable classrooms to the Kinsley Street parking lot, which would not have allowed for transitional housing or congressional funding use. The classroom option was estimated to be more expensive and slower. Key Outcomes - Resolutions Introduced: - R-26-019: Authorizing the purchase of 14 Mulberry Street. Sponsored by Aldermen Thibault, Smith, O’Brien, Gregg, Dowd, Kelly, Morgan, Clee, Clemens, and the President. Given first reading and assigned to the Planning and Economic Development Committee and the Planning Board. - R-26-020: Authorizing the Mayor and City Treasurer to issue bonds not to exceed $900,000 to fund the purchase, design, pre-renovation work, and renovations for the resource center. Same sponsors. Assigned to the Budget Review Committee. - Public Hearing Scheduled: A special Board of Aldermen public hearing on both resolutions was scheduled for Wednesday, April 15, 2026, at 7:00 PM in the Aldermanic Chamber. - Commitments: Director Cummings committed to keeping the board updated on tenant relocation progress and to provide a more detailed cost estimate and design update in May. - Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 8:00 PM after a unanimous roll call vote (13-0).

The Budget Review Committee met on Monday, March 23, 2026 at 8:33 PM in the Aldermanic Chamber to consider three items: a supplemental appropriation for overtime, a bond authorization for public works garage design, and a collective bargaining agreement with the police patrolman's association. The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 PM. Consent Calendar - R-26-003 (as amended): Supplemental appropriation of $15,000 from assigned fund balance to Department 161 (Streets) account 5130 (overtime) and $40,000 to Department 177 (Parks) account 5130 (overtime). Motion to recommend final passage carried unanimously by voice vote. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were made. Discussion Items R-26-007: Bond Authorization for Public Works Garage Design - Proposal: Authorize the mayor and city treasurer to issue bonds not to exceed $3 million for the design of a new public works garage. The original amount was $5.5 million; the reduction of $2.5 million was noted as shifting some costs to the construction phase. - Key Details: The new garage would cover 47% of vehicles indoors (up from 20%), with seasonal storage allowing all plow trucks indoors during winter. The design is expected to be completed by spring 2026, with a construction bond resolution anticipated in May 2026. The total construction cost is estimated at approximately $48 million. - Sustainability: The building will be EV-ready with charging infrastructure, and will be equipped for future solar installation (though not initially). Heat captured from methane gas is expected to save approximately $100,000 per year. - Positions: - Alderman Tebow expressed strong support, noting the current facility is "deplorable" and operational efficiency gains (e.g., reducing vehicle retrieval time from 30 minutes) will benefit residents. - Alderman Senate expressed support but questioned the 47% indoor coverage, asking for cost-benefit analysis specific to that configuration. He was assured the numbers were tied to the current plan. - Alderman Greg encouraged tours of the current facility and highlighted the inefficiency of operating from multiple locations. - Alderman Greig (via Zoom) inquired about EV maintenance capabilities and solar plans; Director Foto confirmed the design accommodates both. - Alderman Sullivan (not on committee) noted the payback period from savings was 60-108 years but appreciated the cost-benefit analysis. He asked about the full construction timeline and the $100,000 annual heating savings. - Alderman Klee (not on committee) supported the project, stating the current conditions are substandard and that the city has a fiduciary responsibility to invest in proper facilities. - Alderman O'Large (not on committee) expressed concern about the overall bonding capacity, noting a target of $25 million per year over five years, and asked for a prioritization of major projects (e.g., fire station, DPW garage, renovations). He indicated he would not support the design bond until he had more information. - Outcome: Motion to recommend final passage carried. One alderman abstained (citing counsel's advice) and one opposed. R-26-017: Collective Bargaining Agreement – Police Patrolman's Association - Proposal: Approve cost items from a four-year collective bargaining agreement (July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2030). Raises: 4% in year 1, 4% in year 2, 3.5% in year 3, and 3.5% in year 4. Uniform allowance increased from $650 to $1,100. - Presentation: Chief Kevin Rock detailed recruiting and retention challenges. Over the last five years, 79 officers were hired but 75 left (over half left the profession entirely). The department is currently 15 officers below authorized strength. An IACP workload assessment indicates a need for 18 additional patrol officers. Rock noted that neighboring communities (Hudson, Laconia) have salary levels that are now competitive or surpass Nashua. The contract was negotiated respectfully and focused on raises. - Positions: - Chief Rock, the Police Commission, Mayor, and 11 aldermen endorsed the contract. - Alderman Kelly supported the contract but expressed concern about the level of detail in health care plan language, preferring more flexibility. She also questioned the uniform allowance increase but accepted the chief's explanation. - Alderman Johnson supported the contract, citing the importance of police. - Alderman Tebow supported, noting the need to retain officers. - Alderman Klee (not on committee) supported, praising the police department's training and performance, especially during the Sky Meadow incident. - Outcome: Motion to recommend final passage carried unanimously by voice vote. Key Outcomes - Vote on R-26-003: Recommended final passage (unanimous). - Vote on R-26-007: Recommended final passage (one abstention, one opposed). - Vote on R-26-017: Recommended final passage (unanimous). - Schedule: Budget committee meetings may be pushed to May; the public hearing on the budget may be delayed by one week. Donna will provide updated schedule. - Next Steps: R-26-003 and R-26-007 will appear on the Board of Aldermen agenda for March 24, 2026. R-26-017 will also go to the full board. The design phase for the garage is expected to be completed by spring, with a construction bond resolution in May.

The Board of Aldermen held a special meeting on March 24, 2026, to conduct two public hearings: R26003, a supplemental appropriation for downtown and riverfront cleanup overtime, and R26007, a bond authorization for the design of a new Public Works garage. The meeting began with a pledge of allegiance and roll call, with 11 aldermen present. The budget review committee chair presided over the hearings. Public Hearing on R26003 – Supplemental Appropriation for Cleanup Overtime - Presentation: The resolution proposed appropriating $15,000 for Streets Department overtime and $40,000 for Parks Department overtime from assigned fund balance to cover cleanup and maintenance of Main Street, the riverfront, and the library walk from April 1 through June 30, 2026. The scope and cost were reduced from a previously discussed $200,000 due to the shortened time frame. - Public Testimony: Bill Ferrio (35 Indian Rock Road) questioned the cost reduction, and a city representative explained the scope reduction. Paul Shea, Commissioner of the Board of Public Works, spoke in favor, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the riverwalk for safety and welcoming atmosphere. No testimony in opposition was offered. - Outcome: The public hearing was closed at 7:06 p.m. No vote was taken on the resolution at this meeting. Public Hearing on R26007 – Bond Authorization for DPW Garage Design - Presentation: Tim Cummings, Director of Administrative Services, introduced the request for up to $3 million in bonds to fund the pre-construction phase (design, site prep, soft costs) for a new Public Works garage at the landfill site. A detailed presentation was given by Director of Public Works Lisa Foto, architect Jeff Alberti (Weston & Sampson), contractor Rob Prunier (Harvey Construction), and engineer Scott LeClair (Fitzmeyer & Taciuch). Key points included: - The existing 50-year-old Stadium Drive facility is structurally deteriorating, lacks ventilation, and stores only 67 of 364 vehicles indoors, exposing 80% of a $45 million fleet to weather damage. - The proposed 136,000-square-foot facility would store 170 vehicles, protect $14.7 million in additional assets, and yield $25–45 million in cost savings over 50 years through reduced maintenance, extended vehicle life, and improved efficiency. - Unique energy savings: The garage would be heated using waste heat from the landfill’s methane generator, saving energy equivalent to nearly 100 homes annually and reducing CO2 emissions by over 100 vehicles per year. - A cost-benefit analysis showed that delaying the project would increase construction costs by $12–44 million over 5–15 years, while losing operational savings. - Clarifying Questions: Aldermen asked about the use of the $3 million (design and pre-construction), the future of the Stadium Drive site (undetermined), and the longevity of the methane heat source (consistent for the building’s life). Alderman Johnson expressed concern about past neglect of employee facilities, noting that donated chairs were used in the break room. Director Foto clarified that the city could afford new chairs, but employees had chosen salvaged chairs as a morale-building effort. - Public Testimony: - In favor: Commissioner Paul Shea, Commissioner June Lemon, and Commissioner Manny (from Board of Public Works) spoke in strong support, citing the need to protect city assets, improve employee safety and morale, and show respect for workers who maintain city infrastructure. - In opposition: Laurie Ortolano (41 Berkeley Street) opposed the project, citing lack of transparency and poor project tracking by the board (e.g., the Riverwalk project). She argued that the board does not provide regular financial reports and that she had to file right-to-know requests to obtain spending data. She also noted high turnover in Community Development and questioned the city’s ability to manage large projects. - Outcome: The public hearing was closed at 8:25 p.m. No vote was taken on the resolution at this meeting. Key Outcomes - The Board of Aldermen held two public hearings as required by the city charter. - No resolutions were voted on during the meeting. The hearings were for information gathering and public input. - The meeting adjourned at 8:27 p.m. following a unanimous roll-call vote on a motion to adjourn (all 11 present aldermen voted yes).

The Nashua Planning Board convened on March 20, 2026, to approve two conditional use permits and receive a detailed presentation on the proposed zoning code update (Recode). The board approved a driving school at 14A Broad Street and a Mexican restaurant at 264 Main Dunstable Road. The majority of the meeting was dedicated to a presentation by staff on the Recode initiative, covering form-based standards, redevelopment overlays, parking, landscaping, and other policy questions. The meeting adjourned at 9:46 PM. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes (March 5, 2026): Motion by Mr. Hirsch, second by Mr. Zoller. All members in favor, none opposed. Minutes approved as written. Discussion Items - Case A26-0015: Conditional Use Permit – 14A Broad Street (Driving School): Applicant William Bradford proposed a classroom-only driving school operating 6:30-8:30 PM, with a maximum of 6 hours per week and up to 30 students per class. No exterior changes. Staff recommended a condition requiring a Traffic Impact Report (TIR) worksheet. The board found the application meets criteria in Section 190-133F. Public hearing: no speakers for or against. Approved unanimously. - Case A26-0017: Conditional Use Permit – 264 Main Dunstable Road (Mexican Restaurant): Applicant Victor Chavari proposed a Mexican restaurant (Bajatacos de Ritos) operating 11 AM to 10 PM. Staff noted historical parking in the public right-of-way without recorded easements, but parking requirements are met on-site. Staff conditions include a modified SOAR permit and a traffic letter. Public hearing: no speakers. Approved unanimously. - Recode Presentation and Policy Discussion: Sam, representing planning staff, presented an update on the comprehensive zoning code rewrite. Key topics included: - Introduction of form-based standards (building placement, massing, architectural details) calibrated to existing Nashua patterns. - Redevelopment overlays (voluntary, allowing higher intensity use in exchange for affordable housing and master planning). - Policy questions debated by the board: Commercial/Industrial district on Northeastern Boulevard: Whether to require stronger form standards (e.g., zero front setback, parking in rear) to improve walkability vs. concerns about chilling development. Board members expressed mixed views, with Mr. Hirsch skeptical of pedestrian demand and others favoring gradual change. Manufacturing as a conditional use in overlays: Generally supported with limitations (enclosed operations, noise mitigation). Downtown architectural standards: Discussion on requiring complementary historic character vs. allowing modern styles. Preference emerged for a material/style guide rather than strict mandates. Residential use simplification: Consolidating many residential subcategories into household living, group living, and group living with services. Self-storage facilities: Debate on encouraging multi-story vertical forms vs. traditional single-story; some members favored vertical designs in visible areas. Landscaping payment-in-lieu: Concept supported for cases like car dealerships where on-site landscaping is impractical; funds would be used for tree planting citywide. Technical Review Committee (TRC) delegation: Staff explored expanding TRC approval authority for smaller, conforming site plans. Board expressed interest but concerns about public notification; will consider thresholds. Temporary waiver mechanism for form standards (10-20% flexibility) to allow adjustments before permanent codification. - Future topics: Inclusionary zoning (target AMIs, percentages), approval criteria, and overlay area thresholds. - Target effective date: July 1, 2026 (aligned with upcoming state law changes). Staff plans to submit legislation by May 1. Key Outcomes - Conditional Use Permits Approved: - A26-0015 (14A Broad Street): Approved unanimously with one condition (TIR worksheet). - A26-0017 (264 Main Dunstable Road): Approved unanimously with three conditions as noted in staff report. - Recode Update: Staff will continue to refine policy based on board feedback. No votes taken; further discussions planned at PEDC and future meetings. - No Proposals of Regional Impact: Motion by Mr. Varley, second by Mr. Hirsch, passed unanimously. - Meeting adjourned at 9:46 PM.

This public meeting, hosted by the Mayor and city officials, provided an update on the West Hollis Street corridor improvement project. The project aims to address safety, traffic, and pedestrian concerns along the 2.9-mile stretch from Riverside Street to the Hollis town line. Engineers presented the preferred alternative, a nine-phase phasing plan, and funding challenges. Residents provided extensive input on specific intersections, roundabouts, traffic signals, and shared-use path design. Project Overview and Preferred Alternative - The corridor study began in July 2023, with the first public meeting on February 6, 2024. The preferred alternative, selected after public feedback, is a 10-foot-wide shared-use path on the south side (crossing to the north side near the charter school), one vehicle lane in each direction, left-turn lanes where warranted, and pedestrian crossings with rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFBs). - The project estimate is approximately $16 million in 2026 dollars. Phasing and Funding - The project is divided into nine phases, each costing $1–3 million. Phase 1 focuses on the MicroSociety Charter School intersection, including a new signal at Gendron Street and the charter school driveway, and a mid-block crossing. - Phase 2 extends the shared-use path west; Phase 3 proposes a roundabout at Westgate Crossing; Phase 4 continues the path to Trussell Brook; Phase 5 adds a signal at the landfill entrance; Phases 6–8 extend the path further west; Phase 9 addresses the Riverside Street intersection with dedicated left-turn lanes and signal tie-in. - Funding sources include federal grants, the New Hampshire DOT Local Project Administration program (80% federal/state, 20% local match), and direct city bonding. The city has set aside $200,000 for a local match. A grant application in 2025 was unsuccessful; a new application is planned. Public Comments & Testimony - Ralph Bushar (Westgate Village): Opposed a roundabout at Westgate Crossing, stating it would be a "nightmare" and requested a traffic light instead. - Carl Schadig (10 Cimarron Drive): Expressed concern that a roundabout at Westgate would be too small to be safe; advocated for larger roundabouts based on experience in Europe. - Chris Siebert (Ledgewood Hills): Questioned how a new signal near the charter school would coordinate with the existing Wellesley/Ledgewood Hills light, and asked for details on funding sources. - Ed Nusbaum (Ledgewood Hills): Requested immediate repair of three manhole covers near Westgate Village that are not at grade, causing vehicle damage. - Elaine Nusbaum (Ledgewood): Frustrated with the long merge lane from Riverside and drivers cutting from the left lane; noted the Riverside light stays too long even with no traffic. - Terry Negron (28 Tanglewood Drive): Asked if the city would coordinate with the town of Hollis on the western phases, as traffic builds from Massachusetts and Hollis. - Ernie Jetty (Ledgewood): Expressed support for roundabouts, noting they allow smoother traffic flow; hoped adaptive signal technology would improve off-peak operation. - Dan Kelly (Ledgewood Hills): Asked about short-term paving plans (told pavement from Ledgewood Hills to Riverside is planned for later this year) and whether widening would require eminent domain. - Joan Champagne (Ledgewood Hills): Asked how the city prioritizes projects when competing for grants, and whether the city has internal competition for funding. - Don Boray (11 Trunk Brook, Gate City Bike Co-op): Emphasized the need to accommodate electric bikes (up to 20 mph) and tricycles on the shared-use path; suggested seeking corporate donations from Trek and Park Tool. - Margaret Maloney (Westgate): Could not envision a roundabout working at Westgate Crossing due to cut-through traffic, retirement facility, and rehab center growth. - Kathy Peterson (Westgate Village, 37 years): Opposed the roundabout, wanted a traffic light; noted school buses with few children, property loss concerns for a neighbor whose driveway already has no room. - Matt Tancredi (Settlement Way): Asked for cost comparison of roundabout vs. light at Westgate; questioned the city's paving criteria, citing a street that was repaved that was in good condition. - Andrew Sylvia (Nashua Inklink): Asked whether a tax increment financing (TIF) district had been considered; the Mayor explained it is not a good candidate due to limited development potential. Key Outcomes - No formal votes or decisions were taken. The project remains in the concept and funding stage. - Next steps: The city will continue applying for grants; if a grant is not secured soon, a local bond (requiring a 10-vote majority on the Board of Aldermen after a public hearing) may be considered for Phase 1. - A paving project from Ledgewood Hills to Riverside is planned for the 2026 construction season. - City officials will hold another public meeting in a few months to provide further updates.