Public Meetings - Nashua, New Hampshire

The meeting convened at 6:00 p.m. in the aldermanic chamber to discuss two ordinances proposing to repeal the city's camping ban on public property. After extensive public comment, both ordinances were tabled by a voice vote. A planned presentation on the downtown employee permit discount program was postponed to a future meeting. Public Comments & Testimony - Mary Lou Blazedale (32 Webster St, Nashua; chair, Downtown Improvement Committee; business owner): Opposed repealing the camping ban. Stated her committee unanimously opposes repeal, citing improved downtown conditions since the ban and concerns about safety, sanitation, and business viability. Read a statement from Fuad Mafus (owner of PRG Rug) who also opposed repeal, noting progress made and risks to downtown perception. - Steve Kenny (9 Sagamore Rd, Nashua; chair, Mine Falls Advisory Committee): Opposed repeal. Described a recent trail day where 70 volunteers removed 3,500 pounds of trash and approximately 100 syringes from an encampment area. Stated the park has seen improvements and that repealing the ban would be “insanity.” - David Silva (400 Sherburne Rd, Pelham, NH; co-chair, Mine Falls Park Advisory Committee): Opposed repeal. Recounting personal experience cleaning encampments, including finding human waste and a dead dog. Urged the committee not to rescind the ordinance. - Stephen Scarrow (11 East Hobart St, Nashua): Opposed repeal. Described encampments with trailers, decks, and grills. Argued that allowing camping encourages people to stay outdoors and enables addiction, and compared the situation to Seattle or Portland. - Morgan Hollis (11 Bartlett Ave, Nashua): Opposed repeal from a land-use perspective, urging that any camping be designated, regulated, and planned. - David Godisman (18 Indian Rock Rd, Nashua): Opposed repeal. Cited personal experiences cleaning needles and human waste from his downtown office, and warned that repealing the ban would attract more homeless individuals. - Skylar Wheeler (Alley Street area, Nashua; member of Housing Revolving Fund Committee and GSOP): Supported repealing the camping ban. Called the ban “cruel, heartless, and inhumane” and urged building more shelter beds. - Paula Lockhead (Westbrook Dr, Nashua; Mine Falls Advisory Committee): Opposed repeal, emphasizing environmental harm to Mine Falls Park, including pollution in Oxbow Lake and harm to wildlife. - Bob Keating (5 Coburn Woods Dr, Nashua; GSOP member): Supported repeal. Argued the city had an implicit promise to keep the warming station open when the ban was enacted, and noted state legislation (House bill passed unanimously) requiring alternatives to camping bans. - Tori Marquitz (Manchester, NH; works in Nashua): Supported repeal. Stated shelters are full and the ban increases instability for homeless individuals. - Travis Morgan (no address given): Supported repeal in a lengthy speech, urging the committee to address root causes rather than displace people. Discussion Items - Ordinance 026004 (repealing prohibition on camping on public property) and Ordinance 026005 (repealing prohibition on campers and recreational vehicles on public property): Both were introduced but their sponsors were absent. Alderman Johnson moved to table both ordinances after public comment, which was seconded and passed by voice vote (non-debatable motions). - Alderman comments: Alderman Johnson thanked public speakers and emphasized the need for a plan. Alderman Smith expressed concern for homeless individuals now that the warming station is closed and urged temporary solutions. Alderman Dow noted that many questions from a prior meeting remained unanswered and that police support keeping the bans. The Chair (Alderman O'Brien) expressed disappointment at the ordinances, stating they lacked details on fire safety, sanitation, and distance between tents, and questioned the lack of alternative solutions. - Alderman Johnson agreed with the Chair, noting concerns about downtown safety (e.g., drug activity near the library) and the need for a balanced approach. Key Outcomes - Motion to table Ordinance 026004 passed by voice vote. - Motion to table Ordinance 026005 passed by voice vote. - The downtown employee permit discount program discussion was deferred. - The meeting adjourned at 9:23 p.m.

The Board of Aldermen held a special meeting on Wednesday, April 22, 2026 at 7 p.m. in the Aldermanic Chamber to consider two resolutions related to a proposed resource center for unhoused residents at 14 Mulberry Street: R-26-019 authorizing the purchase of the property for $900,000, and R-26-020 authorizing bonds up to $900,000 for purchase and renovations. After extensive public comment, the board voted 12-1 to table both resolutions. The meeting adjourned at 8:27 p.m. Public Comments & Testimony - Unhoused speaker (no name given): Expressed full support for a resource center but urged the board to reopen or extend the warming station until the center opens, accelerate emergency shelter and transitional housing, and commit to outreach that builds trust. Described the camping ban as "manufacturing despair." - Representative Will Darby (Ward 8, Hillsboro District 11): Stated that homelessness is a serious concern caused by federal and state policies beyond city control, with average home costs of $550,000 and over $2,000 for a one-bedroom apartment. Urged moving forward with the resource center, calling it a "calculated risk." - Christy AI (member of Granite State Organizing Project and Main Street United Methodist Church): Spoke in support of the resource center from a long-term perspective, emphasizing safety, security, and respect for unhoused individuals. Said a centralized location makes sense. - Karen Bill (homeowner of 15 years, 364 days): Opposed the purchase, citing lack of inspection on a 168-year-old building, paying $150,000 over asking price, and new information about lead paint remediation funds that warrants a new public hearing. Asked her alderman to vote no. - Beth Scare (11 East Hobart Street): Noted that Tim Cummings said the purchase and renovation could cost up to $4.5 million, and that the mayor's proposed budget is up 6%. Argued that spending on "boondoggles" drives up property taxes and rents. Said vote no. - Stephen Scarer (11 East Hobart Street): Opposed the purchase, saying the city should first define what the resource center will do and then find the most appropriate and least expensive property, not the reverse. Concerned about expansion of city services and enabling outdoor sleeping. Urged slowing down. - Laurie Ortolano (41 Berkeley Street): Continued opposition, citing the lack of inspection, a comparison to the Performing Arts Center cost overruns (from $10 million to $34 million), and lack of transparency. Noted that the planning board's vote was not revealed and that new information (HUD funding, lead program) warrants another public hearing. Asked for records and said the process is rushed. - Brooke Pearley (wife of business owner at Three Bud Way): Expressed support for the resource center, stating that how the city treats all community members says much about who it is. Said "perfection cannot be the enemy of progress" and that waiving inspections and paying over asking are common in today's housing market. Thanked the board. - Joan Donahue (Ward 9): Asked to slow the project. Supported the need for a resource center but said 14 Mulberry Street is the wrong location, wrong price. Cited past city project failures (Performing Arts Center, other bonds). Said she saw a floor plan from Director Bagley but wants a full plan and more transparency. - Matthew Guthrie (104 Fawn Lane): Expressed concern about the accelerated purchase, noting the historic residential property would need rezoning, is not ADA compliant, not fire sprinkler ready, and won't accommodate commercial kitchen or required beds. Cited the planning board's unfavorable recommendation due to lack of due diligence. Asked why not use vacant commercial or school properties, and why the city is in a hurry when other cities used grants and private funds. Asked to vote no. - Laura Cohomer: Found it concerning to spend $900,000 on a 3,000-square-foot building. Noted that the city acquired 11-13 Mulberry Street (33,000 square feet) in February 2025 but returned it to the former owner without requiring repayment of back taxes or bringing the matter to the Board of Aldermen. Raised concerns about process, transparency, and oversight. - Tori Markowitz (Manchester resident, volunteered at warming station): Supported the resource center, saying she trusts public health experts who have been looking for property for two years. Said the temporary parking lot option would have cost $1–2 million for mobile classrooms. Encouraged a yes vote. - Fred T. Boom (24 Cheyenne Drive): Opposed the purchase, calling it "negligent." Said a 3,000-square-foot residential building is too small for 50+ clients daily, and $4.5 million for renovation would be $1,500 per square foot. Also noted that Director Solomon mentioned forfeiting $1.2 million in federal grants. Alleged corruption and requested a roll call vote. - Bob Keating (5 Coburn Woods Drive): Spoke against the purchase, stating a resource center without significant housing is low priority. Noted the director of public health said shelter is more important. Argued that $4.5 million could be better spent on housing units, reopening the warming station ($350,000), or vouchers. - Judith McDonald (Dan Fourth Road, Apt 23): Opposed 14 Mulberry Street. Suggested using Elm Street Middle School as a resource center since it is not likely to be sold for a couple of years. Noted the expense of maintaining a 150-year-old building. Key Outcomes - Motion to table R-26-019 (authorizing purchase of 14 Mulberry Street) by Alderman Tebow passed by roll call vote: 12 in favor (Aldermen Clee, Smith, Tebow, O'Brien, Gregg, Dowd, Sullivan, Senate, Johnson, Morgan, Lopez, Wilshire), 1 opposed (Alderman Clemens). - Motion to table R-26-020 (authorizing bonds up to $900,000 for the resource center) by Alderman Dowd passed by roll call vote: 12 in favor (same as above), 1 opposed (Alderman Clemens). - Motion to adjourn passed by roll call vote: 11 in favor, 2 opposed (Aldermen Tebow and Lopez voted no). The meeting adjourned at 8:27 p.m.

The Planning and Economic Development Committee met on April 22, 2026 (the transcript indicates the meeting began on April 21, 2026 at 7:00 PM local time, but the metadata records the date as April 22, 2026). The committee reviewed a presentation by Planning Manager Sam Durfee on the ongoing code update, focusing on a mock development comparing base zoning and redevelopment overlay, with extensive discussion on inclusionary zoning (IZ), density factors, and development incentives. No votes were taken; the discussion was informational. Discussion Items - Mock Development Comparison: Durfee presented a scenario using a large site (Building 19 lot) on Amherst Street, comparing development under the existing commercial-industrial base zoning and under the proposed mid-rise neighborhood district group overlay. The overlay allows greater density, mixed-use, and requires a master plan when over 2 acres. - Block Standards and Thoroughfares: The overlay introduces block standards, pedestrian sheds, and thoroughfare design speeds to create a more connected, pedestrian-friendly street network. The base zoning has no block standards to allow flexibility for industrial uses. - District Transitions: Higher-intensity districts (e.g., MR6) are clustered around civic spaces, transitioning to lower-intensity districts toward property lines. The committee discussed the importance of smooth transitions between districts and between overlay and adjacent base zoning. - Building Types: The overlay permits additional building types (apartment, shop house, townhouse, lab building) with form-based standards. The base zoning permits only shop, general, block, and fabrication buildings. Design standards for commercial-industrial buildings were debated; Alderman Sullivan and Alderman Clee expressed concern about the lack of aesthetic standards in industrial areas, while Durfee noted the need to balance flexibility with community character. - Inclusionary Zoning (IZ): Durfee explained that the overlay triggers IZ requirements because the state does not allow mandatory IZ; instead, density bonuses are offered. The IZ tiers: 10% affordable for 10–49 units, 15% for 50–99 units, 20% for 100+ units. AMI tiers average to 75%–100% AMI depending on project size. A 99-year covenant for rental units was discussed; for ownership, a shorter term (e.g., 10 years) was proposed to avoid disincentivizing investment. - Density Factor Example: Using a 150,000 sq ft general building, base density factor of 1,125 sq ft yields 133 units. With IZ (27 affordable units at 75% AMI), the density factor drops to 850 sq ft, yielding 176 units—a net gain of 43 units for the developer. - Buyout Analysis: Two approaches were presented: construction cost basis (higher fees) and value gap analysis (based on difference between market and affordable rent). The committee leaned toward the value gap approach to make buyouts feasible but not overly attractive. Current buyout amounts ($37,500 rental, $100,000 ownership) are considered too low, and the current IZ ordinance has not been successful—only two projects have used it outside of master developments. - Green Score and Sustainable Development: Durfee introduced a green score system for landscaping that can also grant a density bonus. The sustainable development path is an alternative to IZ for achieving the 850 sq ft density factor. HB 428 prevents using building code standards, so the focus is on site design (e.g., solar, EV readiness, green roofs). - Next Steps: The committee will review a policy point document refined from the presentation. Additional meetings are planned to finalize the code update. Key Outcomes - No formal votes or decisions were made. The committee will continue discussions at a future meeting, with Durfee to provide further analysis on green score cost-benefit and other policy points. The public was not heard due to the informational nature of the meeting.

The Board of Public Works met on April 21, 2026, and approved a corrected agenda, routine consent items, several wastewater and solid waste contracts, a drain layers license, and personnel actions. A detailed presentation on the city's sidewalk inventory and a discussion on the proposed Drop Mobility bike share program highlighted the meeting. The board also entered a non-public session for personnel matters. Consent Calendar - Approved the agenda with a correction to move up the Administration Department item on Drop Mobility. - Approved the minutes of the Board of Public Works meeting of March 26, 2026. - Approved wastewater user warrants as presented. - Approved sewer service permits and fees as submitted. - Approved the pool license petition as listed in the staff report. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public addressed the board. Discussion Items - Drop Mobility Bike Share Program: Sustainability planner Levettna Kinchief presented a proposed hub-based bike share system starting with 50 pedal-assist bikes. The service area is downtown, bounded by the Nashua River, the Turnpike, Greeley Park, and Rivier University. Initial pricing: $1.50 to unlock and $0.25 per minute, with a $1.50 tether fee to park temporarily outside a hub. Discounted memberships are available for SNAP recipients. The bikes have GPS and a maximum speed of about 20 mph; the app will prohibit sidewalk use. Bikes will be available from early morning to near midnight (not 24/7). Commissioners raised concerns about hub coverage for areas like South Nashua and Amherst Street, credit card requirements, maximum charges, and potential expansion. No formal vote was taken; the discussion was informational. - Wastewater Contracts: - Approved FY27 purchase of sodium hypochlorite ($300,000) from Borden and Remington of Fall River, MA, pending budget approval. - Approved FY27 purchase of sodium bisulfite ($88,000) from PVS Chemical Solutions of Detroit, MI, pending budget approval. - Approved contract with Northeast Earth Mechanics LLC for replacement of wastewater treatment facility thickening room drains ($151,918.62). - Approved contract with Hazen and Sawyer of Boston, MA for ammonia sampling and identification within the collection system ($107,992). Superintendent Boucher explained that increased ammonia levels are causing compliance challenges with a new EPA permit; the study will help identify sources and inform treatment options. - Solid Waste: Approved contract with Greg Balcom Landscaping of Milford, NH for brush grinding at the Four Hills Landfill ($35,000). - Engineering: Approved a drain layers license for BMB Excavation LLC of Chichester, NH, including a six-month probationary period for license suspension if work is unsatisfactory. - Sidewalk Inventory Presentation: City Engineer Dan Hudson presented a comprehensive sidewalk inventory. Data from a citywide survey: 185 miles of sidewalk, 2,700+ ramps, and 559 crosswalks. Condition breakdown: 48.2 miles good, 100.3 miles fair, 36.2 miles poor (20%). Estimated cost to replace all poor sidewalks is $30 million (about $800,000 per mile). The city has no dedicated sidewalk program but has replaced 850 ramps through the paving program, uses LPA projects (80% federal funding) and sidewalk quadrant funds for repairs. Discussion included prioritization near schools, tree root damage, and dangerous conditions. Alderman Down requested the presentation be sent to aldermen and asked about a long-term plan. Commissioner Gregg expressed interest in a yearly plan. No formal vote was taken. - Administration: Discussion of Holman Stadium events was postponed to the next meeting due to the absence of Alderwoman Amber Morgan and Commissioners Shea and Speedia. Key Outcomes - Approved: All wastewater and solid waste contracts as listed above. - Approved: Drain layers license for BMB Excavation LLC. - Approved: Unsealing of non-public minutes from the March 26, 2026 personnel meeting. - Approved: Acceptance of resignation of Patrick Carr from the wastewater department, effective April 24, 2026. - Motion passed: By roll call (Commissioner Gregg, Mayor Donchus, and one other), the board entered non-public session pursuant to RSA 91-A:3 II(b) for the hiring of a public employee. - Motion passed: To seal the minutes of the non-public session until a future vote deems confidentiality no longer necessary. - Adjourned: The meeting adjourned at 5:00 PM.

The Human Affairs Committee met on April 21, 2026, at 7 p.m. in the Aldermanic Chamber to consider the Fiscal Year 2027 CDBG/HUD Annual Action Plan, including recommended awards for public service and public facility grant requests. The committee also accepted three federal grants for transit and fire services. Key discussions centered on the transparency of the CDBG process, project delays at the Mary Sweeney Home, and the ineligibility of the Ledge Street Playground project for CDBG funds. Public Comments & Testimony - Kristen Wilson (Mary Sweeney Home, 50 East Pearl Street) presented the agency’s FY2027 CDBG request for $100,000 to replace 40+ year-old windows. She noted that funding for previously approved projects (ADA doors, kitchen refurbishment, Wi-Fi, re-keying, HVAC) from FY2024/2025 has not yet been disbursed due to radon testing delays. Committee members expressed concern and asked Community Development for a timeline on the outstanding ADA door installation. - Laurie Ortolano (41 Berkeley Street) raised several questions about the CDBG process: whether the city has a formal written scoring methodology, what internal controls exist to prevent subjective selection, how contractor conflicts of interest are identified, and whether environmental reviews are completed before contracts are executed. She noted that the Mary Sweeney Home application was missing from the online portal and urged the committee to require full documentation before voting. Discussion Items - CDBG Update and Ledge Street Playground Ineligibility – Director Matt Sullivan reported that the Ledge Street Playground project ($50,000 in CDBG funds) is ineligible because the school district’s restriction on public access during school hours conflicts with HUD requirements for public use. The project will be removed from the contemplated list. Mr. Sullivan took responsibility for not communicating this earlier. The committee requested future communications be more timely. - Mary Sweeney Home Delays – Mike Jungers, Urban Programs Manager, explained that delays in disbursing prior awards stemmed from federal radon testing requirements, late HUD allocations, and staffing changes. He stated that four previously awarded projects (National Children’s Home, Nashua Soup Kitchen, Mary Sweeney Home, Police Athletic League) are now moving forward. The soup kitchen contract is signed with work starting May 4; children’s home bids are due this Friday; PAL is awaiting radon mitigation bids; and Mary Sweeney Home needs an updated ADA scope for its kitchen. Director Sullivan noted the department is understaffed due to diminishing HUD allocations and cannot currently fill a vacant project administrator position. - Resolution R26018 – Transit Grant (Senior Free Fare Program) – Acceptance of $377,874 from NH DHHS for senior free fare transit passes for FY2026-2028. Approved unanimously. - Resolution R26024 – Fire Grant (Hazmat Planning & Training) – Acceptance of $41,600 from NH Department of Safety for hazardous materials team long-term planning and conference attendance. Approved unanimously. - Resolution R26025 – Transit Capital Grant – Acceptance of $678,300 (SFY2025) and $425,000 (SFY2026) from NH DOT to replace five paratransit buses. The funding repurposes an anticipated grant that did not materialize. Approved unanimously. - FY2027 CDBG Public Service Allocations – The committee considered requests totaling $120,000 against a cap of $96,692.85. After debate, they recommended: - Overnight Winter Warming Station: $50,000 (full funding) - Family Promise of Southern NH: $34,305.07 (partial) - Financial Empowerment Center: $0 Motion passed 2 yes (Sullivan, Lopez) and 1 abstention (Kelly). - FY2027 CDBG Public Facility Allocations – The committee considered requests totaling $771,000 against available funds of $319,000 (after administrative and other deductions). After discussion, they recommended: - Nashua Children’s Home (boiler replacement): $83,923.50 - Nashua Center (roof replacement): $57,214 - Gateways Community Services (deck at Atherton site): $57,214 - Police Athletic League (water intrusion): $30,000 - Front Door Agency (elevator): $46,069.85 - Gloria Timmins Community Center (HVAC): $9,500 - All other projects funded at $0 (including Boys & Girls Club, Mary Sweeney Home windows, soup kitchen generator, Nashua Children’s Home entry door, etc.) Motion passed 2 yes (Sullivan, Lopez) and 1 abstention (Kelly). Chair noted that the recommendations would return as formal legislation for final action. Key Outcomes - Unanimous acceptance of three federal grants (R26018, R26024, R26025) for transit and fire services. - The Ledge Street Playground CDBG request was withdrawn due to ineligibility. - Committee recommended public service allocations totaling $84,305.07 and public facility allocations totaling $283,921.35 for FY2027 CDBG. - Community Development committed to improving transparency via the online project portal and to providing quarterly updates to the committee. - Director Sullivan and Manager Jungers accepted responsibility for communication and project delays, while noting staffing constraints due to reduced federal allocations. - Public commenter Ortolano’s requests for documentation (CAPER reports, instand records) were partially addressed; the 2024 CAPER is complete and the 2025 CAPER is in process with HUD. - The meeting adjourned at 9 p.m. Note: This meeting occurred on April 21, 2026, though the transcript indicates the session began on April 20, 2026, and continued past midnight. The agenda and minutes were not available.

On April 20, 2026, Christy Knalt, coordinator of wellness resources for the city of Nashua, introduced Mike Tomlin from Empower as the new representative for the city's 457B plan. The presentation, held during Financial Literacy Month, covered fundamental investing concepts, the power of compound interest, pre-tax vs. Roth contributions, 457B plan features, and retirement planning strategies. Presentation Overview - Mike Tomlin used a time-value-of-money calculator (investor.gov) to illustrate compound growth: a hypothetical new hire saving $500/month for 35 years at a 7% annual return would accumulate approximately $1,033,000. He emphasized the "race to $100,000" as the point where compounding becomes noticeable. - The Rule of 72 was explained: at a 6% return, money doubles in 12 years; at 7%, in about 10 years. - Pre-tax contributions reduce current taxable income and grow tax-deferred, taxed as ordinary income upon withdrawal. Roth contributions are made after tax, but qualified withdrawals (including earnings) are tax-free. - The 457B plan offers flexibility: participants control contribution amounts, investments, and timing of withdrawals. Required minimum distributions begin at age 73 or 75. Discussion Items - Contribution Limits for 2026: Standard limit is $24,500. Age 50+ catch-up: additional $8,000 (total $32,500). For ages 60–63, a special catch-up of $11,250 (total $35,750). A pre-retirement catch-up allows up to $49,000 annually for three years before retirement, based on unused prior contributions. - Secure Act 2.0 Change: Participants earning over $150,000 in FICA wages must make post-50 catch-up contributions as Roth dollars. This does not apply to those without FICA wages (e.g., certain public safety employees not in Social Security). - Plan Loans: One loan at a time. General purpose loans: 12–60 months. Principal residence loans: up to 10 years (documentation required). Current interest rate: 6.75%. Fees: $50 origination + $25 quarterly. Interest is credited to the borrower's account. - Investment Options: Three investor types: (1) "Do it for me" – managed through My Total Retirement (additional fee), (2) "Help me do it" – target date funds or online advice, (3) "Do it myself" – self-directed with a full fund lineup. Target date funds use a glide path that shifts from stocks to fixed income as retirement approaches. - Rollovers: Old 401(k)s, 403(b)s, and IRAs (except Roth IRAs) can be rolled into the 457B plan. Empower provides rollover specialists. - Q&A Highlights: - Retirees can take systematic withdrawals or ad hoc amounts; minimum 20% tax withholding is typical, but participants should consult a tax advisor. - Participants can change their investment portfolio at any time via the Empower website, adjusting both current holdings and future allocations. Some funds may have trading restrictions (e.g., 90-day limits). - Enrollment is available at empower.com by entering Social Security number and other information. - The relationship between the 457B plan (provided by the city) and Empower (selected vendor) is record-keeping and participant education. Key Outcomes - Mike Tomlin encouraged attendees to: (1) enroll in the 457B plan if not already enrolled, (2) register for online access, (3) consider increasing contribution rates, especially with raises or promotions, (4) schedule a retirement readiness review (available in June, or at upcoming benefits fairs in May), (5) update beneficiary designations, and (6) download the Empower mobile app. - No formal votes or decisions were made; the session was educational. Attendees were directed to contact Mike Tomlin directly (914-355-6624) or the Empower call center (available until 10 p.m. ET weekdays and Saturdays 9 a.m.–5:30 p.m.) for further assistance.

The Budget Review Committee of Nashua, New Hampshire, met on April 17, 2026 (the meeting began on April 16 at 7:00 PM and concluded at 8:50 PM local time) to review the proposed fiscal year 2027 budget for the city. The meeting included presentations from the City Clerk, Mayor’s Office, Parking Department, Public Library, and the Division of Public Health and Community Services (Community Services, Community Health, and Environmental Health). The committee accepted several communications, introduced the budget resolution (ORD 26-028), and ultimately voted to table the resolution to the next meeting on May 5, 2026. Communications - The committee accepted and placed on file communications from the Superintendent of Englewood Suburban Cemetery, National Office of Emergency Management, the Welfare Officer, and the Legislative Affairs Manager, all regarding fiscal year 2027 operating budgets. Discussion Items - City Clerk (Dan Healy): Presented a budget increase exceeding the mayor’s three percent guideline, primarily due to two elections (1 election in FY26 vs. 2 in FY27) costing approximately $60,000–$70,000, and $63,000 for remaining poll pads to equip all wards. He also requested a $10,083 reduction in contracted services (line 55699) for digitizing records, now to be done in-house. He expressed confidence in revenue projections, noting increases in dog licenses, UCC fees, and marriage licenses. - Mayor’s Office (Megan Carron, Chief of Staff): Explained that the differences between department proposed and mayor proposed budgets reflect the removal of step increases for unaffiliated employees (saving $420,000 in the general fund and $115,000 in enterprise funds). She noted a clerical error in the wages/interns line (51403) that should be shifted to wages/elected officials (51500). New positions proposed: communications manager, facilities manager, park foreman (2), parking staff, recreation superintendent, and resource center specialists (2). She also noted that the budget book lacks actuals columns; actuals are available on the city website. - Parking Department (Jill Stansfield, Manager): The department is within the mayor’s three percent guideline. Revenue is projected flat compared to FY26, but actuals through March 31, 2026 show $1.338 million in total revenue (parking meter fees: $379,929 vs. $319,000 year-to-date last year). The increase is attributed to fee/fine increases implemented in January 2025. The department is under renovation and hopes to be self-sufficient via an enterprise fund in the future. - Public Library (Jennifer McCormick, Director): The library budget came in below the mayor’s three percent guideline, with no new positions. Three positions moved to the new facilities maintenance department. The library includes $53,000 for contract negotiations and contingency for 50 Sunday overtime hours. The board of trustees and Friends of the Library fund additional programs (e.g., $128,000 in trust fund expenditures in 2026, $37,000 from Friends for calendar 2026). - Public Health and Community Services (Bobby Bagley, Director): The community services budget increased 17% due to costs for the warming station (starting November instead of December, running through April 15) and the new resource center. The resource center is expected to be funded in part by a $300,000 fund set aside. The community health budget (Kim Bernard, Chief Public Health Nurse) includes a new electronic medical records system, a hepatitis C program, and the VaxCare program (which increased vaccine administration rates by 89%). Environmental health (Heidi Peake via Zoom) noted a need for new software to replace paper inspections and a small increase for mosquito trapping. The department licenses about 525 food service facilities and over 100 pools/spas. - Transparency and Budget Format: Several aldermen (Johnson, Kelly, Senate, Tiabo) requested actuals (spending through March 31) and individual salary information for new positions. Karen Carron clarified that the budget book lacks actuals due to timing, but they can be provided. The committee requested that salaries for all positions be added to the final approved budget book, and that new position salaries be provided separately. Key Outcomes - Motion to Table ORD 26-028: Alderman O’Brien moved to table the budget resolution (ORD 26-028) to the next meeting. The motion carried unanimously. The next meeting is scheduled for May 5, 2026, focusing on the school budget. - Requests for Information: The committee requested that the CFO provide actuals (line-item spending as of March 31) and a list of all proposed salaries (especially for new positions) before the final budget decision. The city clerk will also reduce his contracted services line by $10,083 at the budget wrap-up. - No Public Comments: No members of the public spoke during the comment period.

Note on date: The meeting minutes/transcript indicate the meeting occurred on April 15, 2026, but the provided metadata states April 16, 2026. This summary uses the metadata date as instructed. This joint meeting of the Budget Review Committee (BRC) and the Planning and Economic Development Committee (PEDC) was held to consider two resolutions concerning the purchase of 14 Mulberry Street for a resource center, warming station, and transitional housing. The meeting included public comments, extensive discussion on funding and due diligence, and votes on both resolutions. Public Comments & Testimony - Bob Keating (5 Coven Woods Drive) expressed support for the approximately $4 million project, stating he was "stunned" that the city had reached this point and trusted the process to maximize help for the most vulnerable. - Matt Sullivan (Community Development Director) clarified that the $1.2 million in congressionally directed spending (CDS) through HUD is likely unavailable for this project because signing a purchase and sale agreement constitutes a "choice-limiting action" before the required environmental review, disqualifying the project from those funds. He noted that HUD's environmental review process is specific and time-consuming, and the CDS process has a 6–9 month runway. Discussion Items - Support for the purchase (R26-019): PEDC members (Alderman Clee, Tebow, Morgan, and fill-in Gregg) spoke in favor, emphasizing that the project was long-planned (on the Capital Plan since at least 2024) and necessary due to dangerous conditions at homeless encampments. They acknowledged the property is not perfect but argued that waiting for perfection has delayed action. They expressed trust in Director Bagley and staff that the property can meet immediate needs and serve as a first step. - Concerns about bonding (R26-020): Several committee members questioned the use of bonds for $900,000, noting it is a relatively small amount. CFO Don Enright and Director Tim Cummings explained that using cash reserves late in the fiscal year would be imprudent, and bonding preserves capacity for larger projects. Cummings added that the city's current debt sales are well under the $25 million limit, but this project may push other capital projects (e.g., DPW garage, fire station, library) to later years. - Potential loss of federal funds: Director Sullivan stated that the $1.2 million CDS cannot be used for this project even if split into phases, as HUD views the entire project as one. A hypothetical restart (e.g., walking away and reacquiring later) might allow use of those funds, but that is not feasible now. - Planning Board input: Director Sullivan reported that the Planning Board gave an unfavorable recommendation (2-3 vote) on the property due to accelerated timeline and lack of due diligence (e.g., no environmental studies). However, the board understood the city's need and acknowledged the recommendation is advisory. Members of the committee (Alderman Morgan, Clee) clarified that the Planning Board typically reviews fully developed plans and that their concerns were technical, not substantive opposition to the project. - Alderman Johnson's position: He expressed concerns about lack of inspection for an old building (asbestos, foundation cracks) and opposed bonding for a small amount, preferring cash or waiting for a larger bond. He indicated he would not vote for the bond but might support the project later once design and costs are clearer. Key Outcomes - R26-019 (Purchase authorization): Approved by PEDC on a roll call vote of 4-0 (Alderman Clee, Tebow, Morgan, Gregg all yes). The resolution authorizes the purchase of 14 Mulberry Street and recommends final passage to the Board of Aldermen. - R26-020 (Bond authorization up to $900,000): Approved by BRC on a voice vote (with audible opposition). The motion to recommend final passage carried. The bond will fund purchase, design, pre-renovation work, and renovations of the resource center. At least one member (Alderman Johnson) voted against the motion. - Adjournment: The meeting adjourned at 9:08 PM by roll call vote of 9-1 (Alderman Senate opposed? The roll call shows all yes except one? Actually the transcript says "Alderman Tim Senate Vice Chair No C" – likely a transcription error. The final tally was 9-1 in favor of adjournment).

The Nashua Board of Aldermen held a special meeting on April 16, 2026 (starting at 7:00 PM on April 15, 2026), to conduct a public hearing on Resolution R26020, which authorizes a bond of up to $900,000 to fund the purchase, design, and renovation of 14 Mulberry Street for a permanent resource center and transitional housing for unhoused residents. The meeting included roll call attendance, an announcement regarding a vacant Ward 1 alderman seat, presentations from city staff, and public testimony. No vote was taken on the resolution; the hearing concluded at 8:01 PM, followed by a joint PEDC budget meeting. Announcements - Alderman President Wilshire announced the resignation of a Ward 1 alderman and that letters of interest for the seat would be accepted through the end of April. Public Hearing on R26020 Presentations by City Staff - Bobby Bagley, Director of the Division of Public Health and Community Services, explained that the resource center would provide housing navigation, emergency shelter referrals, substance use and mental health treatment referrals, help with obtaining vital documents and benefits, showers, laundry, computer access, and warming/cooling stations. Transitional housing units would also be included. - Latonia Mussioli, Housing Services Officer, noted that a pilot tenant-based rental assistance program (using HUD HOME-ARP funds) would complement the center. - Tim Cummings, Director of Administrative Services, provided details: total project cost is estimated between $4 and $4.5 million, funded by the city initially. The current proposals are for acquisition and pre-construction ($900,000 bond), with a future bond for construction. An architect (Icon Architecture) has been identified but not yet contracted. Design would run through summer 2026, construction starting fall 2026 at the earliest, with completion projected for summer/fall 2027. He clarified that the Elm Street Middle School warming station would continue to be used for the foreseeable future. Alderman Questions and Discussion - Alderman Gregg asked about the timeline for a temporary warming station component; Cummings stated Elm Street would remain in use. - Alderman Johnson questioned the procurement process for the architect, noting the city's ordinance may require an RFP. Cummings said professional services can be procured without a bid, and they had issued an earlier RFP for architectural services. He offered to pursue a separate RFP if desired. - Alderman Johnson also questioned the building's capacity for transitional housing and warming station. Cummings could not provide specific numbers until design is done but stated the building (roughly 3,500 square feet) is expected to meet programmatic needs. - Alderman Sennett asked about using the $300,000 expendable trust fund (established last year) to offset costs. Cummings confirmed it could be used for pre-construction or construction to reduce bond amounts. - Alderman Sennett also noted that the $10,000 earnest money deposit came from a budget, not the trust fund. - Alderman Morgan inquired about ADA compliance and who would operate transitional housing. Cummings said the building must be 100% ADA compliant, potentially requiring an elevator. Mussioli stated that a third party would likely operate the transitional housing. - Alderman Clee asked about the temporary trailer proposal (a previous option) vs. the permanent solution. Cummings explained the trailers were a temporary, less expensive option (1.5–2 million) with no transitional housing, while 14 Mulberry Street is a permanent solution for about 4–4.5 million. He cautioned that $1.2 million in alternative funding may not be available for this project. Public Testimony In Favor: - Eric (9 Johnson St., member of Granite State Organizing Project) supported the center as a central resource for documentation and substance abuse services. - Tori Markowitz (759 Grove St., Manchester, Granite State Organizer) supported the center but urged that it not be the last action on homelessness; an emergency low-barrier shelter is still needed. - Gail Wisington (65A Amherst Rd., Merrimack) supported the center but stressed the need for a shelter due to limited effectiveness without a place to stay. - Sam Howarth Vargas (Knowell St., Nashua) supported the center as a good start but acknowledged more housing is needed. - Audrey Holston (Five Shore Dr., Nashua) echoed support and noted the center is not a complete solution. - Mark Siler (168 Harris Rd., Nashua) supported the center but asked what will happen to people when the warming station closes and called for long-term housing solutions. - Kenneth (user of the Chestnut Street warming station) expressed support, noting his own pending housing situation and appreciation for staff, but said more long-term help is needed. - Brooke Pearley (wife owns business at Three Bud Way, Nashua) supported the center as an imperfect but necessary step that could open additional grant opportunities. - Lou Jarrus (56 Hain St., Nashua) advocated adding more overnight units during design to address capacity. - Tony Isley (Maynard Homes resident) supported the center, noted the need for permanent supportive housing and low-barrier overnight shelter, and hoped displaced tenants would get better housing. In Opposition: - Bob Keating (5 Coburn Woods Dr.) expressed concern about return on investment given the small size (under 3,000 sq. ft., 5 bedrooms, 4 bathrooms) and $4.5 million cost; suggested using the money for more housing units elsewhere (e.g., $360,000 for year-round warming station) or a temporary solution using portable classrooms. - Annabelle Bonner (2 New Haven Dr., Apt. 203, founder of Bellows Home for Hope) supported the center but was concerned about the gap after the warming station closes; urged a guaranteed plan for current users. - Laurie Ordolano (address not given) supported a resource center but opposed this specific proposal due to poor ROI: the 160-year-old building (1,475 sq. ft. per floor) has high maintenance and ADA costs, and suggested using a single-floor commercial property or the temporary trailer option (1.5 million) to buy time. She asked about data from other resource centers and noted downtown concentration. She cited past city building purchases (e.g., Burke Street) that were sold at a loss. Other Testimony (no final call for additional in favor/opposition was made after Ordolano; the hearing was closed.) Key Outcomes - The public hearing on Resolution R26020 was closed at 8:01 PM. No vote was taken on the resolution. - The meeting adjourned at 8:02 PM via roll call vote (11-0 in favor) to allow a five-minute break before the joint PEDC budget meeting. - No decisions were made on the bond, purchase, or project scope; further discussion and a vote are expected at a future meeting.