Public Meetings - Nashua, New Hampshire

The Personnel Administrative Affairs Committee convened on Monday, February 2, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. in the Aldermanic Chamber to conduct elections, review new appointments for various civic committees, and consider ordinance changes. The committee elected a new clerk, voted on multiple new member appointments for the Ethics Review Committee, Mind Falls Park Advisory Committee, Board of Health, and Arts Commission, and approved two new resolutions. The meeting included a public comment regarding flag policies and a general discussion on committee oversight and emergency response. Consent Calendar - Election of Alderman Derek Kevo as the Committee Clerk for the 2026-2027 term: Unanimously approved. - Election of Alderman Tebow as the Personnel Administrative Affairs Committee member for the 2026-2027 term: Unanimously approved. Public Comments & Testimony - Public Speaker: Addressed the committee regarding new business ordinances and flag policies. - Position: Expressed concern that the proposed flag policy change might merely encourage private input to the Mayor rather than altering behavior, questioned if only flags personally owned by the Mayor would be flown (as opposed to loaned flags), and requested updates to include banners on lamp posts. Discussion Items Ethics Review Committee Appointments - Justin Gerstenfeld: Nominated as a former university administrator and educator with experience in Title IX and ethics reviews. He stated his position as an advocate for applying rules neutrally while considering the human element. - Lou Juris: Nominated as a lifelong resident, former state rep, and retired MBTA employee. He expressed a position of impartiality and fairness, stating he would apply the "smell test" and "silly test" while adhering to guidelines. - Adam Thompson: Nominated as a Marine Corps veteran, former educator, and ward clerk. He expressed a position of supporting accessibility and transparency, drawing on his experience with de-escalation in the military and education sectors. He noted he has no prior knowledge of pending cases. - Conflicting Information: Alderman Johnson noted a discrepancy between the NRO (three-year term) and the appointment document (two-year term for Gerstenfeld). The Mayor clarified the appointment is to serve the remainder of a resigned member's term, a fact Johnson requested be explicitly noted for future appointments to avoid confusion. Minds Falls Park Advisory Committee Appointments - Justin Hoprich: Nominated for his volunteer history at the park. He expressed a position of wanting to facilitate communication between diverse groups (e.g., colleges, athletes, neighbors) and acknowledged he had not previously served on a city committee. - Kamal Massand: Nominated for his long-term volunteer cleanup efforts and legal business background. He expressed a position of being willing to contribute expertise to keep trails clean and manage park traffic. - Michael Sliwa: Nominated for his 40-year residency and recent retirement. He expressed a position of wanting to contribute passion and time to preserve the park. - Committee Oversight: Alderman Lopez expressed concern regarding competing interests (dog parks, sports, residents) and development projects. He questioned if nominees understood the committee workflow and how they would advocate for the park amidst development. Nominees expressed positions of willingness to learn and use their professional skills to triage needs and develop action plans. Board of Health Appointment - Stephanie Ballantyne: Nominated as a registered nurse and nurse practitioner. She expressed a position of offering a new perspective on population and individual health, particularly regarding the unhoused population, following her retirement from a full-time faculty role. - Speaker Support: Alderman Lopez and Alderman Johnson expressed full support, citing her 48 years of service and community involvement (mobile clinics, school nursing) as critical assets, emphasizing the need for a nurse's voice on the board. Arts Commission Appointment - Stephanie Mole: Nominated via Zoom. She expressed a position of prioritizing the publicization of existing art assets (sculptures, murals) to increase community engagement and fostering cross-collaboration between different art groups. - Committee Strategy: Alderman Thibault asked what Nashua is missing; Mole responded that the city lacks awareness of existing programs. Alderman Lopez supported this, expressing a position that collaboration between existing groups (e.g., street art, ballet, orchestral) would create new value. Resolution on Naming of Community Center - R 26-008: Renaming the Arlington Street Community Center to the Gloria Timmins Community Center. - Speaker Positions: Alderman Wilshire and Mayor Lopez expressed strong support, citing Timmins' legacy as a community leader, 20+ year Army veteran, and head of the local NAACP/DAV. Alderman Thibault noted that his ward colleague, Alderman Johnson, had previously attempted to name items inside the center, extending the tribute to the building itself. Ordinance O-26-001 (Flag Regulations) - Discussion: The committee discussed a motion to recommend final passage for regulations regarding flag polls on City Hall grounds. - Speaker Concerns: Alderman Thibault expressed a position of concern that the ordinance passed quickly (3-1) without a prior discussion on the board of alderman, fearing the lack of deliberation might hinder future review. He acknowledged the possibility of the ordinance passing easily but noted the lack of committee scrutiny. Key Outcomes - Election of Clerk: Alderman Derek Kevo was elected as the Committee Clerk. - Appointments Approved: - Ethics Review Committee: Justin Gerstenfeld (term to Dec 9, 2028), Lou Juris (term to Feb 10, 2029), and Adam Thompson (term to Feb 10, 2029). Vote: 3 Ayes, 1 Abstention (Mayor recused). - Mind Falls Park Advisory Committee: Reappointment of Paula Lockhead; New appointments of Justin Hoprich, Kamal Massand, and Michael Sliwa. - Board of Health: Stephanie Ballantyne (term to Dec 31, 2027). Vote: Unanimous. - Arts Commission: Stephanie Mole (term to March 10, 2029). - Citizens Advisory Commission: Reappointment of Jason Tilersky and Oscar Velasis (terms to Dec 1, 2028). - Conservation Commission: Reappointment of Richard Whithew (term to Dec 31, 2028). - Resolutions Passed: - R 26-008: Naming the Arlington Street Community Center the Gloria Timmins Community Center (Unanimous). - O 26-001: Flag regulations on City Hall grounds (3 Ayes, 1 Nay). - Next Steps: The committee acknowledged the need for future reappointing members of active committees to appear for interview to maintain institutional knowledge. Public comment was raised regarding community safety following a recent fire on Main Street, with committee members expressing gratitude for the firefighters' response.

The Board of Alderman convened on January 27, 2026, at 7:30 PM to address the aftermath of a severe 36-hour winter storm, acknowledge Alderwoman Lori Wilshire's record tenure, and deliberate on the Riverfront Renaissance Park mural project. The meeting featured strong support for Public Works Department efforts, significant debate regarding the $105,000 cost of the mural and its funding via Tax Increment Financing (TIF), and the awarding of contracts for a postage meter and library trustee positions. Consent Calendar - Approved a five-year lease and maintenance agreement with Pitney Bowes for a new postage meter at the National Public Library, not to exceed $4,571.40, funded by the General Fund. - Accepted reports from the September 30, 2025, September 29, 2025, October 1, 2025, and October 6, 2025 committee meetings (Joint, Planning & Economic Development, Finance, and Personnel Administrative Affairs respectively) to be placed on file. - Accepted Mayoral appointments for the Ethics Review Committee, Board of Health, and the Board of Library Trustees (Patricia Dresner), with the Board of Library Trustees appointment confirmed by joint vote (18-0). Public Comments & Testimony - Lawrence Barra Savett (National Arts Commission): Expressed full support for the mural selection process, noting the robust committee review of 21 submissions and the unanimous selection of artist Jay Graham. Stated the project includes community engagement plans and that the funding source is strictly for capital improvements, not operations or maintenance. Expressed hope for board approval. - Alderman Tebow: Stated she does not fully support the mural at the proposed cost, citing constituent concerns that $105,000 could house 10 people, and expressed hesitation regarding the budget priorities for downtown versus neighborhood needs, though she acknowledged she may be overruled. - Bob Keating: Expressed strong opposition to the current funding allocation relative to the homelessness crisis, stating that the city needs to devote more direct monies to permanent housing. Argued that the mural's cost represents significant housing potential and that years of talk have failed to solve homelessness. - Bill Ferriel: Expressed concern regarding city budget accuracy, specifically questioning the $5 million discrepancy between planned and actual automobile registration fees in previous years. Argued that the budget should reflect clear historical trends rather than "moving targets," and suggested that accurate budgeting could allow for increased police and fire services at lower tax rates. - Alderman Lopez: Expressed concern for homeless residents during the recent storm, highlighting safety risks with snowbanks and plows, and reiterated the need for emergency shelter solutions. - Alderman Johnson: Expressed agreement with the need for regional cooperation on homelessness and thanked the community for their support. - Alderman Senate: Reiterated thanks for DPW but urged citizens to stop illegally dumping snow onto city streets, noting it creates hazards and increases DPW workload. - Alderman Morgan: Expressed gratitude to citizens for checking on neighbors and to DPW for a clean response, noting zero complaints received. - Alderman Smith: Expressed appreciation for the board's challenges regarding budgetary values, emphasizing that while the mural is desired, the community expects the city to prioritize housing, education, and healthcare in its spending decisions. - Alderman Clee: Congratulated Alderwoman Wilshire, thanked DPW, and advised residents not to leave vehicles on the street during snow events to avoid towing. Discussion Items - Recent Winter Storm: Mayor Jim Donchis and multiple Aldermen (Johnson, Tebow, Lopez, Senate, Morgan, Clee, Clemens) expressed full support and deep gratitude for the Department of Public Works (DPW), Police, and Fire/Rescue for managing a historic 36-hour, 18-inch snowstorm and 15 prior snow incidents. Alderman Johnson noted specific observations of crews clearing hydrants and roads. - Renaissance Park Mural & TIF Finances: - Mayor Donchis: Stated full support for the project, explaining the TIF mechanism: borrowed money paid by future property value increases within the district, which cannot be diverted to other uses. Detailed the committee process involving 21 applicants and the selection of Jay Graham. - Alderman Lopez: Expressed support for the mural's artistic value and community engagement (youth workshops) but stated skepticism regarding the high price tag ($105,000) compared to his past experience with murals costing under $5,000. Argued that local artists should be prioritized, though acknowledged the necessity of compensating artists as business people. Expressed concern about potential structural work on the wall the mural is painted on and the risk of wasting funds if the wall requires demolition. - Alderman Clee: Expressed support for the mural, agreeing that a blank wall invites vandalism. Supported the higher cost as necessary for high-quality work and anti-graffiti protections. Stated hope for future local artist inclusion but acknowledged the need to move forward. - Alderman Johnson: Expressed strong opposition to the $105,000 cost, stating he cannot support the expenditure at this time despite acknowledging the beauty of the art. Cited constituent frustration regarding the focus on downtown capital improvements over pressing issues like homelessness outside the downtown area. - Alderman Senate: Expressed opposition based on the same cost concerns and the "outsourcing" nature of the contract, feeling a disconnect between the price tag and the community need. - Alderman Morgan & Alderman Clee: Both expressed general support for arts and the specific project, with Morgan noting the value of the artist's history and Clee emphasizing the structural integrity and anti-graffiti aspects of the contract. - Alderman Smith: Expressed concern that the expenditure reflects the city's values, suggesting the funds might be better spent on housing or education, though she understood the constraints of the TIF fund. - Structural Inquiry: Alderman Johnson and Lopez raised the possibility that the wall supporting the mural may require structural repair or replacement due to ramp issues. Mayor Donchis clarified that the contract is for funding, not immediate construction, and the board would investigate structural issues before painting commencement. - Committee Process: Alderman Lopez clarified he was not present for the final narrowing of candidates due to schedule conflicts, though the committee ultimately voted unanimously (using ranked choice) for the selected artist. Alderman Clee and Mayor Donchis confirmed the committee's robust selection process involving renderings and interviews. Key Outcomes - Mural Contract Awarded: The Board voted 9 Yay to 4 Nays to award a contract to Jay Graham Studios, LLC, for the Riverfront Renaissance Park mural, not to exceed $105,000, funded by the Riverfront TIF Fund. (Nay votes from Aldermen Senate, Johnson, Morgan, and Lopez). - Library Trustee Elected: Patricia Dresner was unanimously elected (18-0) by the joint convention of the Board of Aldermen and Library Board of Trustees to the open seat on the Library Board of Trustees. - Budget & Planning Adjustments: - The Special Budget Review Committee and public hearings previously cancelled due to weather were rescheduled to Thursday, February 12, 2026. - An infrastructure meeting was rescheduled to February 4, 2026. - A Penetheck Special Water Committee meeting was scheduled for Thursday to interview a trustee candidate. - Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 8:50 PM by a vote of 12-1. Recognitions - Alderwoman Lori Wilshire: Proclaimed the longest-serving Alderman in Nashua history for her continuous service since 1998 (with a brief defeat) and her tenure as President of the Board of Alderman since November 13, 2018. - Gloria Timmins: Resolution (R-26-008) introduced for the first reading to rename the Arlington Street Community Center as the Gloria Timmins Community Center. - Holocaust Remembrance Day: Alderman Morgan noted the observance of the day and the importance of remembrance. Note: While the header of the transcript indicates the date as Tuesday, January 27, 2026, the first sentence of the meeting call states the date as January 27, 2026, while the prompt metadata lists the timestamp as 2026-01-28. The summary reflects the spoken date in the transcript.

The Nashua Zoning Board of Adjustments (ZBA) convened with four members present due to the absence of the Chair, establishing that a simple majority (3 votes) is required for approval in the event of a 2-2 tie, which constitutes a denial. The meeting addressed two variance applications, a rehearing request regarding a previous decision, and standard administrative items. The board unanimously approved both variance applications after deliberation, while simultaneously denying a rehearing request submitted by the applicants of 36 Granite Street, citing procedural compliance and a lack of new material evidence. Consent Calendar - Minutes Approval: The board voted 4-0 to accept the minutes from the previous meeting, with a motion made by Mr. Boucher and seconded by Mr. Patrick. Public Comments & Testimony - 45 Nagel Street (Jira and Alfredo Gutierrez): The applicants, first-time homebuyers who purchased the two-unit dwelling seven years ago, explained they had a driveway extended from gravel to asphalt without initially knowing a variance was required (learning of the requirement two weeks post-construction). They stated the 51-foot total width is necessary for five vehicles since one garage bay is unusable for parking. They expressed no opposition to neighbors. - 55 Lake Street (Weberson Arajo): The applicant, a contractor and property owner, requested variances for multiple uses including an event planning office, apparel rental, photography studio, aesthetic spa, and a church. Mr. Arajo explained that while the church is a permitted use, the Fire Marshal previously opposed the church's location due to sprinkler requirements for a place of assembly. He noted the applicant was told by the Fire Marshal to move the church to the upstairs hall (which does not require a sprinkler system under current safety assessments) to facilitate the other business variances. He testified he does not have funds currently for a whole-building sprinkler system. - Fire Marshal's Opposition (Michael DuVarna): Mr. Falk read a letter from the Nashua Fire Marshal opposing the application primarily due to the church's placement. The letter cited non-compliance with NFPA fire and life safety codes, noting that a church was operating without required permits and that the building had not met occupancy safety criteria for the number of occupants. The Fire Marshal stated that approval would present an unacceptable risk to occupants until proper permits and inspections are conducted. - 36 Granite Street (Rehearing Request): Attorney Christopher Swiniarski, representing the applicants, submitted a motion for rehearing. The request alleged procedural errors regarding the timing of the decision letter and minutes (citing RSA 676). The applicant also requested a reversal of the previous denial and compensation for damages exceeding $90,000 plus interest. Discussion Items - 45 Nagel Street Variance: Board member Mr. Lionel noted the driveway width (51 feet) is significantly wider than the 24-foot code limit and expressed general opposition to such widths, stating "holding his nose" to avoid objecting. However, he acknowledged the driveway had existed as gravel for eight years and that similar driveways exist in the neighborhood. Board members Mr. Boucher and Mr. Patrick acknowledged the width was unusual but supported approval, citing the unavailability of the garage for parking, the presence of similar driveways on the street, and the lack of public opposition. They agreed the variance would not diminish surrounding property values. - 55 Lake Street Variance: Board members discussed the Fire Marshal's letter, clarifying that it pertained solely to the church (a permitted use) and not the business uses requiring this variance. Staff confirmed the board's role is to rule on the use variances for the commercial spaces (photography, spa, contractor shop), while life-safety and permitting for the church remain with the Fire Marshal and Building Department. The board noted the commercial uses are consistent with the building's existing mixed-use commercial nature and that no new safety concerns were raised for the specific requested business uses. Mr. Falk clarified that the board does not have jurisdiction to approve monetary damages; such payments must be approved by the Board of Aldermen. - 36 Granite Street Rehearing Request: The board reviewed the applicant's claim that the decision letter was not issued on time. Staff confirmed the minutes were completed within five business days and the decision letter was sent within the statutory 30-day window. Board members noted the applicant's deadline was met. Mr. Patrick clarified the meeting date was December 9th, contradicting the attorney's claim of December 6th in the letter. The board unanimously agreed that no procedural errors occurred, the decision was legal, no new information was presented that necessitated a rehearing, and nothing would cause the board to change its prior finding that the five points of law were not met. Key Outcomes - 45 Nagel Street (Driveway Variance): The motion to approve the variance to exceed the maximum driveway width to 51 feet for Jira and Alfredo Gutierrez passed 4-0. The board found the variance not contrary to public interest, observed the spirit of the ordinance, did substantial justice, would not diminish property values, and addressed unnecessary hardship. - 55 Lake Street (Use Variance): The motion to approve the use variance for event planning, apparel rental, photograph studio, aesthetic spa, and contractor shop at 55 Lake Street passed 4-0. The board found the requested uses consistent with the commercial zone and the spirit of the ordinance. - 36 Granite Street (Rehearing Request): The motion to deny the rehearing request regarding the decision for Sam N. Katz at 36 Granite Street passed 4-0. The board found no procedural errors, no illegal decision, no new information, and no grounds to change the previous decision. The request for monetary damages was noted as outside the ZBA's authority. - Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 7:47 PM.

The Board of Public Works convened on January 22, 2026, with Commissioners Shea, Lemon, and Gregg, President Speedia, and Mayor Donchess in attendance. Aldermen Brian and O'Dowd were also present. The meeting covered standard consent items, public testimony regarding ice rink regulations, multiple contract approvals for public works and environmental testing, internal board elections, and the Director's report. Consent Calendar - Approved the agenda as submitted. - Approved the minutes from the December 18, 2025, Board of Public Works meeting. - Approved user warrants as presented. - Approved Change Order No. 1 to contracts with Eastern Mineral and Granite State Mineral for an amount not to exceed $1,500. - Approved Amendment No. 1 to the contract with Sanford and Associates Incorporated for $14,172. - Approved sewer service permits and fees. - Accepted street opening permits for the record. - Approved and unsealed non-public minutes from the December 18, 2025, personnel session. - Accepted the retirement of Kevin Broder, wastewater operator, effective January 25, 2026. - Approved the nomination and election of Commissioner Matty Gregg as Vice Chair of the Board of Public Works. - Appointed Commissioner Speedia to the Pension Board following a nomination by Commissioner Shea. Public Comments & Testimony - Public Speaker (Five Minutes Road, Ashua): - Position: Expressed strong support for allowing hockey at Robbie Park, arguing it is a vital, healthy activity for local children who have learned to skate and compete at high school levels. - Concerns: Noted that a recent Parks and Recreation rule banning hockey (despite existing skating hours) reduces community engagement, as the area remains empty without hockey. Highlighted that hockey players often shovel the ice for skaters. - Alternative: Stated that while Lean is the alternative, it is not refrigerated and therefore inferior to Robbie Park for the community. Discussion Items - Resolution R 26-007 (Garage Design Bonds): - Commissioner Speedia discussed the resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Treasurer to issue bonds up to $5.5 million for the Public Works division garage. The Board confirmed the resolution requires Board approval before being finalized and returned to the Board of Aldermen. - Outcome: A budget workshop was proposed for February 6th at 1:00 PM to discuss budgeting, which the Board agreed to schedule. - Solid Waste / PFAS Testing Contract (Item B): - Project Description: Superintendent LaFleur presented a proposal to contract with Sanford and Associates of Bedford, New Hampshire, for up to $250,000 to perform engineering, hydrogeological, and laboratory testing to define the extent of firefighting foam (PFAS) impacts at the Nashville Fire Training Center near the Four Hills Landfill. - Context: Elevated PFOS levels were detected in groundwater downstream from the fire training area. Superintendent LaFleur clarified that current firefighting foam does not contain PFAS, and historical usage likely dates to the 70s or 80s. - Positions: Mayor Donchess noted that while the Board should not be blamed for past foam use, the state is requesting testing from communities with this issue. - Infrastructure & Maintenance Reports: - Director's Report: Superintendent LaFleur reported on the Clock Tower Bridge reconstruction (ongoing), hazard tree removal at Four Corners, and successful ice maintenance at Four Corners, Levine, and Robbie Parks. He noted the new "Super Heroes in the Park" branding for DPW Day and the installation of a new berm on Northwood Drive. A false alarm regarding a landfill fire (caused by the flare) was addressed, and a closure notice for President's Day was issued. - Commissioner Greg: Expressed gratitude for the new fence installed at a local playground, noting positive feedback from families. - Commissioner Speedia: Publicly thanked landfill staff members, specifically Tom, for recovering a lost wedding ring from the dumpster. - Commissioner Shea: Noted a need for additional hay bales at Robbie Park for safety. - Alderman Down: Raised a safety concern regarding a large, deep hole in the courthouse parking lot that poses a risk to pedestrians and residents, requesting city assistance in addressing it. Key Outcomes - Contract Approval: The Board unanimously approved the contract with Sanford and Associates for up to $250,000 for PFAS investigation (Vote: Aye, Aye). - Budget Workshop: Scheduled for February 6th at 1:00 PM to discuss the upcoming budget. - Board Leadership: Commissioner Matty Gregg was elected Vice Chair of the Board of Public Works (Vote: Aye, Aye). - Pension Board Appointment: Commissioner Speedia appointed to the Pension Board. - Safety Directive: The Board committed to investigating and addressing the large hole in the courthouse parking lot, noting it may be state responsibility but requiring immediate attention. - Meeting Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 4:34 PM after going into non-public session for personnel hiring.

The Finance Committee of the City of Nashua convened on January 21, 2026, to review communications, approve contracts, and address public matters. The committee successfully nominated and elected Alderman Sullivan as the new Clerk for the committee. Key discussions focused on vehicle purchases, infrastructure design updates, and the funding of public art projects, with several members expressing concerns regarding expenditure efficiency and vandalism prevention. Consent Calendar - Motion to Elect Clerk: Alderman Clee nominated Alderman Sullivan as the new Committee Clerk; the motion passed unanimously. - Vehicle Purchase: Approval granted for the purchase of two 2025 Ford Maverick hybrid pickup trucks from Garponi Ford for a maximum of $74,604 (funded via Professional and Technical Services). The committee noted the vehicles replace a 2007 Chevy Malibu and a 2008 Ford Escape. - Postage Meter Lease: Approval granted for a five-year lease and maintenance agreement with Pitney Bowes for a new postage meter at the National Public Library, max $4,571.40 (funded via Library General Fund). - Fish Passage Change Order: Approval granted for Change Order No. 4 with Vernonatis LLC for an additional $239,300 regarding the upstream fish passage at Jackson Mills. This funding covers the transition from conceptual to 30% final design, construction estimates, and permitting support (funded via Hydroelectric Operations Capital Improvement Fund). It was clarified that this work is required for federal/state license compliance following turbine changes. Public Comments & Testimony - Alderman Clemens: Expressed confusion regarding the vehicle type (confirming they are hybrids) and queried the necessity of replacing a sedan with a pickup, later stating the vehicle's utility for equipment transport. - Alderman Greg: Expressed strong concern regarding the expenditure of $105,000 for the Renaissance Park mural, citing the recent controversy over trash can costs and the high cost of street cleanup. He questioned if funds could be reallocated to other capital needs like cleanup, noting the difficulty of justifying the cost amidst broader financial constraints. - Alderman Johnson: Stated concern that the mural could be vandalized with graffiti, referencing the $103,000 trash can incident. He requested assurance that a protection plan exists to prevent the loss of the investment if the wall is defaced. Discussion Items - Renaissance Park Mural Project: The committee discussed the awarding of a contract to Jay Graham Studios for a 200x20 foot mural (max $105,000) funded by the Riverfront TIF bond (Bond 70). - Project Details: Economic Development Director Liz Hanum and Arts Commission Chair Laurie Spirit detailed the selection process involving 21 proposals and a unanimous vote by a diverse committee. The mural aims to depict the area's French Canadian mill history. - Graffiti Prevention: The committee addressed concerns about graffiti. Ms. Hanum clarified that the contract includes anti-graffiti coating with a 10-year warranty allowing up to 100 graffiti removals. Alderman Clee corrected the initial testimony, confirming the warranty covers 100 removals (not 3), and noted that blank walls attract more tagging. - Funding Constraints: It was clarified that the funds are restricted to capital projects within the TIF district and cannot be used for maintenance or cleanup. Alderman Wilshire noted the TIF funds were contractual obligations to incentivize developer investment and beautification in that specific quadrant. - Cost Justification: Alderman Clemens calculated the cost at approximately 4 cents per square foot, expressing that it was a "very good deal." - Alderman Clee's Position: Expressed full support for the mural, arguing that a blank wall would invite more gang-related graffiti and that the long-term cost of cleaning a blank surface would exceed the cost of the art. - Alderman Greg's Position: Reiterated that the cost is high but acknowledged the funding restrictions (TIF bond) preventing reallocation to other projects like street cleanup. Key Outcomes - Clerk Election: Alderman Sullivan was elected Committee Clerk (Motion Passed). - Vehicle Acquisition: Approved purchase of two 2025 Ford Maverick hybrids ($74,604 max). - Library Equipment: Approved 5-year lease for a postage meter ($4,571.40 max). - Infrastructure Design: Approved Change Order No. 4 for upstream fish passage design ($239,300 max). - Public Art Award: Approved contract with Jay Graham Studios LLC for the Renaissance Park mural ($105,000 max). - Expenditure Record: Committee confirmed compliance with city charter regarding the record of expenditures for Jan 2, 2026, through Jan 15, 2026. - Adjournment: Meeting adjourned at 7:32 p.m. Discrepancy Note: During the discussion on the mural warranty, Ms. Hanum initially stated the plan included "three coats" allowing for three graffiti removals. This was later corrected when Alderman Wilshire read the agenda document, which specified "two coats" of mural guard with a warranty of "up to a hundred graffiti removals." Ms. Hanum subsequently acknowledged the discrepancy and stated she was corrected. The summary reflects the final, documented warranty of 100 removals.

On January 21, 2026, the Nashua Board of Alderman convened to address a significant upcoming increase in electricity rates for the Nashua Community Power program, effective February 1, 2026. Community Power coalition representatives, including Acting General Manager Henry Herndon and Director of Member Services Jackson Caspari, presented data indicating that the new six-month rate will exceed Eversource supply rates due to financial recovery needs following an unplanned draw on reserves during the winter of 2025. The meeting featured extensive dialogue regarding the causes of the rate hike, the mechanics of the community power model, and the benefits of energy efficiency programs, alongside concerns from council members about customer retention and potential financial risks. Consent Calendar - Communications from Laura Wilshire (President, Board of Alderwoman) regarding a special meeting to discuss rate increases were reviewed and accepted without objection to be placed on file. Public Comments & Testimony - Alderman Volcandor (inferred from context): Expressed concern that customers who opted out of Community Power did not receive an email confirmation of their switch to Eversource. The speaker noted they opted out approximately one week prior and received no confirmation, a sentiment reportedly shared by multiple constituents. - Alderman Morgan: Emphasized the positive market impact achieved by the coalition in the past, stating that Community Power successfully drove Eversource to drop their supply rates by half, and expressed congratulations for this achievement despite current rate increases. Discussion Items Rate Increase and Financial Justification - Henry Herndon (Acting General Manager) Explained that the upcoming rate is driven primarily by the need to rebuild reserve funds after a 2025 winter drawdown. He detailed that 75% of the rate is energy costs, with the remainder comprising ancillary fees, ISO charges, RPS costs, operating expenses, and a reserve adder. He stated that the reserve adder is the primary driver of the differential between Community Power and Eversource rates for this period. - Jackson Caspari (Director of Member Services) Highlighted the benefits of the program, including local control, customer choice, and advocacy, and noted that the organization serves approximately 30,000 accounts with a 63% participation rate. Customer Impact and Opt-Out Mechanics - Alderman T. Ball: Asked about the trajectory of the reserve rebuilding if customers opt out. Herndon responded that conservative assumptions regarding customer attrition are built into the financial modeling. - Alderman Morgan: Inquired about the actual dollar savings for customers opting out. Herndon stated the estimated savings would be between $17 and $20 per month for the upcoming rate period. - Alderman Clee: Expressed concern regarding the lack of mandatory third-party verification for opting in (unlike private sector competitors) and inquired about the eligibility criteria for future opt-in customers who may have previously left the program. Herndon confirmed a program where Community Power customers are prioritized, but specific timing requirements for re-joining are still under discussion. Solar and Energy Programs - Doria (Energy Manager) Clarified that City-owned solar arrays (Lake Street Fire Dept, Transit Garage, and some schools) remain under net-metering agreements with Eversource and will not be enrolled in Community Power to preserve net metering credits. - Henry Herndon: Described the upcoming Nashua Home Energy Coaching Program, which will be funded by a portion of the rate adder. He stated the program offers free energy audits and coaching to a pilot group of selected Community Power customers, with potential rebates for efficiency projects. Regulatory and Market Context - Alderman T. Ball: Asked about the status of Manchester joining the coalition. Herndon confirmed Manchester has not yet adopted membership or launched a program, though approximately 10+ communities are awaiting advantageous timing. - Alderman Clay: Questioned the mechanism of Eversource's rate changes and the risk of under-collection from utilities being passed to customers. Herndon explained that regulators changed rules to allow utilities to use a proxy rate that floats on the spot market, exposing them to volatility. He noted that under-collection reconciliation is now limited to every six months, a rule supported by the coalition's advocacy. - Alderman Morgan: Asked about the contingency if Nashua were to withdraw from Community Power. Herndon indicated a managed process would occur to prevent unfair cost shifting to other members, though it would significantly downsize the organization. Key Outcomes - Status of Rate Change: The Council was presented with confirmation that Community Power rates will be higher than Eversource supply rates for the six-month period beginning February 1, 2026, due to reserve rebuilding. - Customer Notification: The Board directed staff to investigate and resolve the issue regarding missing opt-out confirmation emails for customers who switched to Eversource, noting this affects multiple constituents. - Program Details: It was established that the upcoming energy coaching and audit program will be free for selected Community Power customers, funded by the rate adder. - Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned on a motion carried by a 9-0 roll call vote (with Alderman Clemens and Alderman Greg absent).

The Nashua Board of Aldermen convened on January 14, 2026, to begin their work in the 113th city government. The meeting included the swearing-in of Alderman Clemens as Vice President, a statement by Mayor Donchis regarding state-legislative interactions, and a detailed presentation by Energy Manager Doria Brown concerning significant changes to community power electricity rates scheduled to take effect February 1, 2026. The session concluded with routine approvals, the introduction of new legislation, and public commentary. Consent Calendar - 2026-2027 Aldermanic Committees: The revised committee structure for the upcoming term was approved unanimously by voice vote following an apology from the Mayor for sending a draft instead of the final copy. - Communications: Requests for joint conventions received from the Superintendent of Woodlawn Pinewood Cemeteries (Lynn Fournier) and the Board of Library Trustees (Linda Laflame) were accepted, scheduled for January 27, 2026. - Committee Reports: The report from the September 24, 2025, Committee on Infrastructure meeting was accepted. Public Comments & Testimony - Lori Ordolano: Expressed strong opposition and frustration regarding the handling of the Ethics Review Committee. She stated she was misled by a statement made by Chairman Bush at a December 4th meeting regarding recusal requirements, describing the situation as an "ambush" and an unethical act by a prominent lawyer. She accused the city of using the "art of the ambush" and called for immediate scrutiny of current ordinances and their enforcement. She also raised questions regarding the value and definition of ordinances and citizen rights to enforcement. Discussion Items State Legislative Actions & Daniel Webster College Sale - Mayor Donchis: Discussed his testimony before the Senate Finance Committee regarding a bill to appropriate $20 million to purchase Daniel Webster College from Chinese owner Xinghua Education Consulting. He expressed disappointment that the committee voted 4-2 along party lines not to recommend the bill due to lack of funds. He strongly refuted State Senator Birdsell's statement calling the initiative a "taxpayer bailout" and alleging Nashua City Hall allowed foreign adversaries to buy land, stating the sale was a bankruptcy court auction where the city had no influence. - Alderwoman Kelly: Noted that the committee members (specifically Chair Senator Gray) were polite during the hearing, but the adverse decision was made immediately after. - Alderman Tebow: Questioned whether Republican candidate Lily Tang Williams, who previously opposed a sale to Chinese entities, assisted with the testimony for the purchase of the college; the Mayor noted she did not. - Alderman O'Brien: Criticized the state legislature for failing to return the 75% of state tax income generated by the Greater Nashua area back to the city, contrasting this with the treatment of other communities regarding Keno ticket revenue. He urged the board to demand more from the state regarding infrastructure maintenance, specifically noting the lack of state plows on Route 130. - Alderman Johnson: Expressed hope that the board focuses on solving real problems rather than allowing constituents to be distracted by "disingenuous ideas" and rhetoric, specifically referencing the false narrative surrounding the college sale. - Alderwoman Lopez: Supported the Mayor's efforts, calling the housing opportunity lost due to the state's inaction a "real crisis." She criticized Senator Birdsell's subsequent legislation as opportunistic and "hot air" given her role in the initial xenophobic language surrounding foreign ownership. - Alderman Gray: Reiterated the need to stop focusing constituents on false issues, noting the state's historical failure to support Nashua in the absence of an income tax. Community Power Energy Rates - Doria Brown (Energy Manager): Presented rates effective February 1, 2026. She noted that while the program launched in 2023 with savings (15 cents/kWh vs. 22 cents/kWh for Eversource), current rates have flipped due to the utility's ability to compete in the wholesale market. - Nashua Community Power Rate: 14.663 cents/kWh. - Eversource Rate: 11 cents/kWh. - Difference: Approximately 3.3 cents/kWh, resulting in a cost difference of about $21/month for the average bill. - She explained the rate increase is necessary to build joint reserves to manage cash flow, as the program has historically used reserves to lower rates but must now replenish them. - Alderman Johnson: Expressed concern that constituents may not realize they are auto-enrolled or how to opt out of the program if it results in higher bills, and requested better communication strategies. - Alderman Clee: Clarified that administration costs ($58.9 million in total costs cited) refer to the cost of doing business (staffing, overhead, borrowing for cash flow), not the joint reserve amount ($3.2 million). - Alderman Sullivan: Raised concerns that if many constituents opt out to avoid higher rates, the attrition could negatively impact the financial reserves and stability of the program. - Response: Acting General Manager Herndon confirmed that attrition assumptions are built into their financial modeling and historical data is used to adjust forecasts. - Alderman McKelly: Inquired about the discretionary adder (0.2 cents) and whether it applies to opt-up green energy products. Confirmed it is a city decision and currently applies only to the base rate, not opt-up products. She acknowledged the program is "close to her heart" despite current financial challenges. - Alderman Lopez: Thanked Energy Manager Brown for her transparency and honesty regarding the rate increase and the ability for residents to switch providers at any time. - Alderman Smith: Noted that while 50% of residents receive bills electronically (reducing awareness of rate changes), and others use auto-pay, communication efforts must be robust to reach all constituents without resorting to potentially fraudulent third-party providers. - Corporation Counsel Steve Bolton: Concluded that the introduction of community power as a competitor likely drove the utility's rates down from 22 cents to 11 cents, meaning ratepayers are still paying less than they might have otherwise, even if the community power program is currently more expensive. Other Legislative Items Discussed - R-26-001, 002, 003, 005, 006, 007: First readings and committee assignments were granted for resolutions regarding collective bargaining agreements, retiree stipends, Main Street cleanup funding, municipal bonds for debt refunding, charitable grants, and garage design. Key Outcomes - Personnel: Alderman Clemens was sworn in as Vice President. - Agenda Items Approved: - The 2026-2027 Aldermanic committees were approved. - Three communications for joint conventions were placed on file and scheduled. - Legislation Introduced: - Five resolutions (R-26-001 through R-26-007) were given first reading and assigned to various committees (Budget Review, Human Affairs, Personnel/Administrative Affairs). - One resolution (R-26-004) was removed from the agenda. - One ordinance (O-26-001) regarding flag polls on City Hall grounds was given first reading. - Decisions Made: - The Board accepted that Community Power rates are currently higher than Eversource (14.663 vs 11 cents/kWh) but remains committed to the program. The Board agreed to explore further information dissemination and held off on a final decision regarding future rate structures pending further committee meetings in February, March, and April. - Next Steps: A special Board meeting is scheduled for January 26, 2026, to continue deliberation on the Main Street cleanup appropriation (R-26-003). Aggregation committee meetings are scheduled for the subsequent months to review financials and participation.

This special meeting of the Board of Alderman, held on January 13, 2026, convened to initiate a conversation regarding the City of Nashua's capital improvement planning, debt service management, and the Fiscal Year 2027 Capital Improvements Program (CIP). Administrative Services Director Tim Cummings, CFO Don Enright, and Planning Manager Sam Durfee presented on financing mechanisms, project prioritization criteria, and the city's debt strategy. The discussion focused on aligning over $700 million in identified capital needs with a constrained debt service budget of approximately $23.7 million (15% of the general fund), with a goal of maintaining an average annual debt sale authorization of $25 million. Consent Calendar - The Board received and approved communications from Tim Cummings and Don Enright regarding the request for a special meeting and the fiscal year 2027 CIP report. - A motion to approve the communications and recommendations regarding the CIP report was made and carried; Alderman O'Brien recorded a "Nay" (opposed) vote. Public Comments & Testimony - No formal public testimony was recorded during this segment of the transcript; the discussion remained between Board members and administrative staff. Discussion Items - Bonding Mechanics and Advantages (CFO Enright): - CFO Enright explained that bonding allows the city to manage cash flow for large projects by securing loans at favorable rates rather than paying cash upfront, noting the city's stable budget management is reflected in its Triple-A bond rating. She clarified that using surplus funds to pay cash for some projects helps keep the bonded amount lower. - Alderman Tebow asked how bonding benefits a city and expressed concern regarding proposed state legislation that would restrict bonding to only "dire emergency" situations. Enright argued that such legislation would negatively impact the city's ability to plan capital projects and would cause debt service to "ebb and fro," likely lowering the city's credit rating. - Alderman Tebow further asked for an explanation of the benefits of maintaining a bond rating for future borrowing capability. - Fee Structures and Cost Transparency (CFO Enright & Director Cummings): - Alderman Johnson requested a detailed breakdown of additional costs associated with bonding, such as attorney fees and interest, comparable to a mortgage closing statement. He asked staff to provide a future breakdown of these overhead costs for the Board's review. - Alderman Lopez asked for a comparison of the costs when tax collection funds are used versus bonding, specifically to understand the overhead costs incurred by the city's internal staff for managing bonded funds. Enright agreed to provide a full expense breakdown. - Capital Improvements Program (CIP) and Project Scoring (Planner Durfee): - Sam Durfee presented the CIP as a six-year planning effort developed by the Capital Improvements Committee (CIC), which ranks 125 project requests based on seven criteria including urgency, readiness, and economic impact. - Alderman Cleese expressed concern that the Lock Street and Whitney Street project scored only 3.56/5 despite an 80-20 state match potentially being lost. Durfee explained that while the economic impact is high, the project's low "urgency" and "readiness" scores (due to the 10-year timeline and lack of immediacy) lower its overall ranking, even if it has a match deadline. - Alderman Senate questioned why some projects with lower scores are requested for funding sooner (FY27) while higher-ranked projects are scheduled for later years. Durfee noted that department heads identify their top three priorities, and these requests reflect articulated needs that may outweigh raw scores for immediate funding. - Alderman McKelly inquired about the scoring consensus process, confirming that the committee uses individual scoring averaged out to minimize subjectivity. - Debt Service Strategy and Fiscal Constraints: - Director Cummings reiterated the goal of maintaining a debt service budget around $23.7 million (approx. 15% of the general fund) and a five-year average of $25 million in new debt sales. He noted a previous preference to use cash surplus over bonding, highlighted by the Lock Street project, but acknowledged the need to balance strategic cash usage with project pacing. - Cummings outlined a list of previously authorized projects (garage/fleet maintenance, stadium repairs, Mohawk Tannery bridge, hydro improvements, parking garage, transportation signals, police training facility, roofs, school projects) and proposed future spending growth targets for the operational budget. - Procedural and Process Questions: - Alderman O'Brien requested clarification on the inclusion of fire department roof repairs, which Cummings confirmed are included in the authorization. - Alderman Cleese verified that the Board previously chose a $25 million debt limit over a recommended $30 million to maintain a safety buffer and confirmed the policy of using cash for projects under $1.5 million, though noting some exceptions occurred for strategic design authorizations. - Alderman Sullivan questioned the procedural choice to authorize design costs before final bond approval for the DPW garage. Cummings explained this two-step process (design then construction) mitigates the risk of construction cost inflation (approx. 10% annually) and ensures more accurate bond amounts, preventing the need for re-authorizations due to slippage. - Alderman Johnson discussed the school construction process, noting that final costs are determined only after construction drawings are priced, justifying the initial design funding phase. - Alderman Johnson asked if the CIP scoring considers the strategic use of bonds to increase future tax bases. Durfee clarified that while most projects are maintenance-focused, a few economic development projects (e.g., Riverfront) are weighted for potential future tax revenue expansion. - Alderman Lopez asked if this weighting disadvantages essential but non-revenue-generating projects like the DPW truck washing station. Cummings responded that the city balances strategic investments (TIF) with core service funding, often ensuring core services are carved out or funded directly even within TIF districts. - Alderman Kelly raised the issue of construction cost inflation due to planning delays and asked if construction teams are involved in the planning phase. Cummings confirmed that involving construction teams early is standard practice to keep costs within target budgets. - Ad Hoc Committee Reconstitution: - Director Cummings proposed reinstituting the ad hoc committee to finalize the FY27 CIP and prepare bond resolutions for the upcoming budget season. - Alderman Johnson questioned whether an ad hoc committee is the appropriate vehicle compared to a direct budget committee conversation. - Alderman Cleese moved to adjourn the meeting. Key Outcomes - Motion to Adjourn: Made by Alderman Cleese; carried with all voting "Aye" at 7:52 p.m. - Strategic Direction Established: The Board was briefed on the recommendation to maintain a debt service budget at approximately 15% of the general fund and limit annual debt sales to an average of $25 million over five years. - Next Steps: Staff will email the presentation deck to the Board and provide requested fee breakdowns. The Board is asked to consider reconstituting the ad hoc committee to refine the Capital Improvements Program and prepare bond resolutions for the Spring budget season. - Clarification on Priorities: The Board confirmed the inclusion of specific deferred maintenance items (fire department roofs, HVAC) in the FY27 debt service figure.

The Nashua Zoning Board of Adjustment convened on January 14, 2026, with a full complement of members including Chair Jamin Kara, Vice Chair Josh Neely, and members JP Boucher, Robert Shaw, Steve Lynell, and alternate Joseph Potri. The agenda included a request to continue a DPW water line application, three substantive variance requests, and the review of previous meeting minutes. The Board granted all variance requests after deliberations focused on neighborhood compatibility, traffic safety, and property hardship. Consent Calendar - The Board reviewed and approved the minutes from the previous meeting as amended, correcting typographical errors regarding street names (Dearborn vs. Dearbore) and clarifying the existence of public opposition during the prior hearing. - Officer slate for 2026 established: Jamin Kara confirmed as Chair and Josh Neely as Vice Chair. Public Comments & Testimony - Christopher Delucia (Applicant, 12 Waltham Drive): Expressed support for his own request to build an 8x10 shed, stating he needs storage but has a small lot abutting Greenwood Park. He noted that 11 of the 18 houses abutting the park already have sheds within the setback line. - Gage Armand, owner of 106 West Holloway Street LLC: Stated that the proposed basement apartment would not increase traffic or noise beyond existing levels, would be owned and occupied by the business operator, and would treat the property consistently with neighboring mixed-use buildings. - Morgan Hollis, Attorney for Law Realty Co. Inc.: Explained the complex signage needs for a redevelopment involving three lots (338, 340, 350 Amherst Street). The applicant argued that the proposed locations were necessary for traffic flow and safety on a busy road and requested specific variances for sign size, location, and definition. Discussion Items - 25 Teak Drive (City of Nashua/Fire Rescue): The Board discussed a request to continue the wetland special exception application. The applicant noted a desire to update the waterline plan to reduce temporary wetland impacts and visual effects, aligning with suggestions made by Board Member Shaw previously. They sought to coordinate with the Conservation Commission meeting scheduled for February 3, 2026. - 12 Waltham Drive (Christopher Delucia): Board members discussed the applicant's small lot size and the impracticality of building the shed in the center of the yard if the setback were not modified. Board Member Shaw expressed that the proposal was consistent with the neighborhood and that the fence backing the property to a public park further diminished any potential negative impact. Board Member Lynell supported the use of a fence as a mitigating factor. - 106 West Holloway Street LLC (Gage Armand): The Board deliberated on a use variance for a live-work unit in a basement apartment. Board Member Shaw expressed strong support for owner-occupied units in commercial zones, noting it fosters neighborhood investment. Board Member Neely supported the request, stating he is a "big fan of a business owner putting down roots" and that the use fits the character of the RC zoning district. - 350 Amherst Street (Law Realty Co. Inc.): The Board reviewed a complex request involving three variances related to ground signage for a multi-building redevelopment. Board Member Lynell questioned the traffic flow and the necessity of the proposed sign locations. The Board discussed the safety implications of having clear signage on a high-traffic road (Amherst Street/Whittier Highway), concluding that the proposed signs would prevent drivers from slamming brakes or missing turns. Board Member Neely commended the applicant's detailed planning and argued the variances were necessary to maintain traffic flow between the three interconnected properties. Key Outcomes - Continuance: The application for the water line at 25 Teak Drive was tabled and continued to February 10, 2026, upon motion by Mr. Neely and second by Mr. Lynell. All members present voted in favor. - Variance Granted (12 Waltham Drive): Application by Christopher Delucia to encroach 4 feet 8 inches into the rear yard setback for an 8x10 shed was granted. The Board found the variance met all five criteria, including substantial justice and unnecessary hardship due to the small lot size. A motion to approve was made by Mr. Shaw and seconded by Mr. Boucher; the vote was unanimous. The applicant noted a 30-day appeal window. - Variance Granted (106 West Holloway Street): Application by Gage Armand for a single residential unit in the basement of a commercial property was granted as a use variance. The Board found this met the criteria for public interest (housing stock, live-work character), spirit of the ordinance (preserving underused space), and hardship (owner-occupancy and unique building history). A motion to approve was made by Mr. Neely and seconded by Mr. Shaw; the vote was unanimous. - Variances Granted (350 Amherst Street): Three variances for Law Realty Co. Inc. were granted: (1) to exceed the 100 sq ft limit for a ground sign (123.5 sq ft exists), (2) to maintain an existing sign within 75 feet of an intersection, and (3) to place a ground sign on 350 Amherst Avenue for the benefit of the adjacent 340 Amherst Street. The Board found these actions would not be contrary to public interest, would enhance safety, and would not diminish property values. A motion to grant was made by Mr. Shaw (Chair) and seconded by Mr. Potri; the vote was unanimous. A condition was suggested that no ground sign be placed directly on 340 Amherst Street, which the applicant accepted. - Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned following the approval of the new officer slate and the motion to adjourn, with the next meeting scheduled to cover the Orient Street agenda.