Public Meetings - Nashua, New Hampshire

The Budget Review Committee convened on Monday, July 27, 2026 at 8:40 PM in the Aldermanic Chamber, with the meeting continuing past midnight and thus recorded as July 28, 2026. The meeting was called to order by the Chair. Roll call showed all members present. The primary agenda item was Resolution R260-04, a supplemental appropriation of $1,607,694.55 from various revenue sources, including casino gaming revenue, field rental fees, and fund balance. Also considered were Resolution R260-50 transferring $35,000 for the senior center and Ordinance O-26-17 to discontinue a solid waste equipment reserve fund. Public Comments & Testimony - Myra Nikitas, Nashua resident, thanked the committee for the positive vote on the dental program (traveling tooth ferry), emphasizing the program’s importance and asked for continued support at the full board meeting. Discussion Items - Resolution R260-04 – Supplemental Appropriations: The bulk of the evening focused on R260-04. Alderman Thibault asked multiple questions about the $300,000+ casino revenue, whether Ledge Street School was at risk of closure (Director Sean Smith confirmed it was not on any closure list), and concerns about vandalism and camera coverage at the playground. Alderman Thibault also raised concerns about fairness to other schools and the need for a formal process to allocate gaming revenue. Director Tim Cummings agreed to develop a program for allocating gaming funds and promised to return in the fall with a proposal. - Motion to Split the Question: Alderman Johnson initially moved to remove the Ledge Street playground and dental program from the resolution, but after discussion, she amended to split the vote on each line item. The motion to split passed 7-0. - Line-by-Line Votes: The committee then voted on each of the seven line items: 1. Ledge Street playground equipment (miscellaneous revenue): 7-0 in favor. 2. Dental program / traveling tooth ferry ($100,000): 7-0 in favor. 3. City retirements ($500,000): 6-1 in favor (Alderman Johnson opposed). 4. Lead grant activities ($40,000): 5-2 in favor (Aldermen Senate and Johnson opposed). 5. Park rehabilitation from facility rental fees ($5,250): 7-0 in favor. 6. Park rehabilitation from field rental fees ($42,758.50): 7-0 in favor. 7. FEMA public assistance grant for COVID-19 salary expenses ($672,299.87): 6-1 in favor (Alderman Johnson opposed). Alderman Thibault and others expressed concern about lack of detail; CFO Don Enright said the detailed ledger is available and denied items will be presented at the full board meeting. - Resolution R260-50 – Transfer for Senior Center: Alderman Dowd introduced David Ferdette, treasurer of the senior center, who explained the $35,000 is used for building repairs and a rainy-day fund. The committee voted 7-0 to recommend final passage. - Ordinance O-26-17 – Discontinuance of Solid Waste Equipment Reserve Fund: The committee voted 7-0 to recommend final passage. Key Outcomes - All seven line items in R260-04 received favorable recommendations; the unamended resolution then passed 6-1 (Alderman Johnson opposed). - Resolution R260-50 passed 7-0. - Ordinance O-26-17 passed 7-0. - The committee adjourned at 9:43 PM. - Next steps: The full Board of Aldermen will vote on these items at its meeting on the second Tuesday in August. CFO Enright committed to providing detailed breakdowns of the FEMA grant expenses before that meeting.

The Board of Aldermen convened a special meeting on July 28, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. in the Aldermanic Chamber. The primary focus was a public hearing on two budget-related items: discontinuance of the solid waste equipment reserve fund (O26017) and a supplemental appropriation of $1,607,000 (R26048) covering multiple projects and fund true-ups. The meeting also included a second reading and final passage of a resolution extending the performance period for three Homeland Security grants (R26052). Aldermen expressed concerns about bundling multiple items in one resolution and raised questions about funding sources, equity, and accountability. Consent Calendar – Public Hearing on O26017 - O26017 – Discontinuance of Solid Waste Equipment Reserve Fund: Director of Administrative Services Tim Cummings explained the fund is no longer needed as solid waste vehicle funding was moved to the SURF. No testimony was offered in favor or opposition. The public hearing closed at 7:04 p.m. No vote was taken at this hearing. Public Hearing on R26048 – Supplemental Appropriation of $1,607,000 - Director Cummings provided an overview: the resolution trues up various accounts at year-end and includes specific projects funded by gaming revenue and other sources. Projects include the Ledge Street Playground ($247,386.18 from charitable gaming), Traveling Tooth Fairies dental program, city retirement trust fund ($500,000), lead grant backfill ($40,000), parks and recreation field fee revenue transfer, and a FEMA COVID grant shortfall ($672,299). Ledge Street Playground Project - Presentation: Michelle Mills, a teacher at Ledge Street School for 32 years, and Rosie Ogagney, assistant principal, presented the project. The current playground is outdated, lacks handicap accessibility, and is dangerously close to the road. The plan relocates the playground to the backfield, with an estimated total cost of $254,406. The school has raised $25,000. The requested $247,386.18 (from charitable gaming) plus the $25,000 raised covers the entire estimate. 78% of students are economically disadvantaged, making PTO fundraising difficult. Several aldermen expressed support, including Alderman Morgan (alumnus) and Alderman Johnson, who asked about separating the playground from the larger resolution. Alderman O'Brien advised consulting the fire department about access for emergency vehicles due to past brush fires. - Clarifying Questions: Alderman Johnson noted the discrepancy between the requested amount ($247,386.18) and the slide estimate ($254,406); Ms. Mills confirmed the balance comes from the school’s fundraising. Chairman Cummings and Alderman Thibault confirmed that the charitable gaming funds are derived from SB 472 (2024). Alderman Clee noted the school’s PTO just became eligible for charitable gaming and urged coordination with local casinos. Traveling Tooth Fairies Dental Program - Presentation: Co-founder Myra Nikitas described the program, a Nashua-based 501(c)(3) providing preventative dental care to children in schools. In the past school year, they served over 1,500 students, placed over 7,500 sealants, and provided over 1,500 fluoride treatments. They also connect children to dental homes and cover urgent care for uninsured children. The program is funded through grants and does not cost the city or school district. They are requesting continued support via the supplemental appropriation. They are on a waiting list for charitable gaming dates (12–24 months). - Discussion: Alderman Morgan questioned why this request wasn't addressed through the Community Assistance Fund (CAC) process, expressing concern about equity for other nonprofits. Alderman Thibault clarified the CAC gave $2,500 to Traveling Tooth Fairies, which was a small amount. Director Cummings acknowledged the point about equitable treatment and suggested future consideration. Alderman Clee noted the program’s positive impact on school attendance. Alderman Greg confirmed the funds would be used only in Nashua. Other Line Items in R26048 - City Retirement Trust Fund ($500,000): Director Cummings requested additional funding to shore up the fund, which currently holds $175,000, as any single retirement could cost over $100,000. The FY27 budget included $250,000; an extra $500,000 is needed. - Lead Grant Backfill ($40,000): Director Matt Sullivan explained that two employees were on paid administrative leave and that HUD determined their time was not reimbursable under the lead/ CDBG grants. The city must cover those payroll costs. Alderman Johnson and Sullivan clarified the funds are an appropriation to cover a liability, not a reimbursement. CFO Enright stated that without approval, it remains an outstanding liability that could become an audit finding. - Parks and Recreation Fee Revenue Transfer: Carolyn O'Connor (DPW) requested moving increased field fee revenue into the expendable trust fund for park improvements. No opposition. - FEMA COVID Grant Shortfall ($672,299): CFO Don Enright reported that total expenses incurred from March 2020 to March 2023 were $1,350,534, but FEMA reimbursement received was only $678,234, leaving a shortfall of $672,299. A major denied item was firefighter quarantine overtime ($373,916). The city has appealed multiple times but final determinations indicate no further reimbursement. Alderman Johnson and Thibault expressed concerns about the lack of detail on other denied expenses. Alderman Clee noted that unresolved liabilities could affect the city’s triple-A bond rating. The item has been on the books since 2023. New Business – Resolution R26052 - R26052 – Extension of Homeland Security Grant Performance Period: The resolution approves extending the grant period to August 31, 2028, at no additional cost, to complete procurement of a hazardous device robotic platform, SWAT ballistic vests/ helmets, and night vision equipment. The original grant expired September 30, 2026. Alderman Lopez confirmed there is no cost to the city. - Vote: Motion to suspend rules for second reading passed unanimously (14–0). Final passage also passed unanimously (14–0). Resolution declared duly adopted. Key Outcomes - The public hearing on O26017 was held without opposition; no further action recorded. - The public hearing on R26048 will be further deliberated at the Budget Review Committee. Aldermen indicated intentions to propose amendments to separate certain line items, particularly the Ledge Street Playground and the FEMA shortfall. No vote was taken at this hearing. - Resolution R26052 was unanimously approved, extending the grant performance period. - The meeting adjourned at 8:36 p.m., followed immediately by the Budget Review Committee meeting.

The Infrastructure Committee met on July 23, 2026 (the meeting began at 7:00 p.m. on July 22 and concluded at 8:50 p.m.) to consider three main items: authorization for the sale of surplus property near Veterans Memorial Parkway, authorization for the auction of tax-deeded properties, and an ordinance to allow overnight on-street parking in Ward 5 during summer months. The committee also accepted several communications and heard departmental presentations. Consent Calendar - Accepted communications from the Board of Aldermen (referrals) and from Planning Manager Sam Durfee regarding R26-046 (sale of surplus property). - Suspended rules to accept two late communications: from Thornton Tomasetti regarding proposed ward 5 overnight parking legislation, and from City Clerk Dan Healy regarding overnight on-street parking in Ward 5 from May 1 to October 31, except on certain main roads. Both were placed on file without objection. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were offered. Discussion Items R26-046: Sale of Surplus Property (Veterans Memorial Parkway Parcel) Matt Sullivan, Community Development Director, presented the proposal to authorize the disposal of an approximately 4-acre right-of-way parcel adjacent to the Mohawk Tannery redevelopment site. The sale would be conducted via a request for proposals (RFP) to unlock development potential, provide for a multimodal pathway, and enable land conservation. Key discussion points included: - Access: No curb cuts onto Veterans Memorial Parkway are preferred, but a curb cut could be considered if a traffic study demonstrates safety. The Mohawk Tannery access will use a blinking signalized intersection. - Alderman Dowd expressed concerns about traffic safety and requested aerial photos of the tannery site for board review. - Alderman Johnson opposed the sale, citing concerns about overbuilding and the housing crisis. She stated that the parcels to the south have already received zoning board approval for development and that the land should be protected. - Alderman O'Brien asked about future capacity of the parkway; Sullivan noted the parkway is underperforming relative to design volumes and has ample capacity. - The city is still working with federal agencies to determine how proceeds from the sale would be split. The committee voted to recommend final passage. R26-051: Auction of Tax-Deeded Properties Diane Mulholland, Treasurer, requested authorization to proceed with a public auction of tax-deeded properties in fall 2026. These properties were acquired after statutory requirements were met. Former owners have a 90-day repurchase period ending September 10, 2026. The auction would return properties to private ownership, place them on tax rolls, and reduce city maintenance responsibilities. Alderman Johnson noted that a mobile home would be auctioned if not repurchased, and that the mobile home park must approve the buyer. The committee voted to recommend final passage. O26-020: Overnight On-Street Parking in Ward 5 (May 1 - October 31) Alderman Johnson introduced the ordinance to allow overnight parking in Ward 5 during summer months, exempting main roads. She argued that residents should not need to call for exceptions and that the current process is insufficient. Presentations and discussion included: - Jill Stanfield, Parking Manager, presented the existing overnight exception program and outlined potential operational impacts such as increased enforcement, staffing, and costs. She noted that the city has about 300 miles of road and 80,000 registered cars. - Jeff LaFleur, Solid Waste Superintendent, explained that street sweeping begins at 3:45 a.m. and that overnight parking would hinder trash collection, requiring a switch from automated trucks (one person, $400,000 each) to rear-load packers (two additional trucks per route, $350,000 each, with three-person crews). - Fire Marshal Mike DeVarney cited fire code requirements for a 20-foot unobstructed width and noted difficulty with cul-de-sacs and tight streets. - Andy Hill, Parking Consultant, stated that the city is working on a structured pilot program in a specific zone, with a draft expected by September. He argued that the current ordinance lacks sufficient structure and registration mechanisms. - Alderman Dowd moved to indefinitely postpone, stating that the eventual proposal would be significantly different. Alderman Johnson preferred to table it. The motion to indefinitely postpone carried. Key Outcomes - R26-046: Recommended final passage unanimously (voice vote). - R26-051: Recommended final passage unanimously (voice vote). - O26-020: Indefinitely postponed (voice vote). The committee expects a new overnight parking pilot proposal to be presented in September. - The committee agreed to provide aerial photos of the Mohawk Tannery site to the full Board of Aldermen.

The Planning and Economic Development Committee met on July 22, 2026 at 7 p.m. in the Aldermanic Chamber. Roll call established a quorum with Aldermen Morgan, Sullivan (via Zoom), Greg, and Tebow present. The meeting included a public hearing on Ordinance O-26-019 and a presentation on parking management as part of the ongoing code rewrite. Public Hearing and Ordinance O-26-019 - Sam Durfee, planning manager, introduced the ordinance to increase the environmental health department subdivision review fee from $40 to $50. Alderman Morgan noted the fee had not been raised in at least 20 years. - No public testimony was given. The committee voted unanimously to recommend approval and passage: Aldermen Sullivan, Greg, Morgan, and Tebow all voted yes. Presentation: Parking Availability Management - Sam Durfee presented proposed changes to parking regulations in the new zoning code. Key points include: - Moving from traditional parking minimums/maximums to a system of earned relief through a Mobility Management Manual. - Two pathways for parking relief: a mobility management plan with menu options (e.g., car share, bike parking, unbundled parking, bus passes) and payment in lieu. - Proposed to empower the administrative officer (planning staff) to grant smaller relief administratively for change-of-use cases, avoiding planning board review. - The manual would be maintained by the planning board, allowing updates without ordinance changes. - Examples of menu items: transportation coordinator, preferential carpool parking, commuter tax benefits, guaranteed ride home, shuttle service, etc. - Annual reporting required to ensure compliance. - For residential: unbundling parking from rent, offering bus passes where applicable. - Case study comparison: standard build (163 units, 1:1 parking, 53,000 sq ft lot) vs. sustainable development (178 units, 0.8 ratio, 50 spaces in garage) showing reduced parking footprint. - Zero parking minimums proposed in Urban Core, Urban Mill, and Urban Core Station Area districts, but only through redevelopment overlays. - Future steps: finalize mobility management manual by September, open houses, legal review, submission as legislation in late fall, effective 2027. Committee Discussion - Aldermen expressed support for the flexibility of the manual and planning board authority. - Alderman Sullivan asked about the fee cost coverage; later noted the health department budget ($530,000.44) and questioned if fees cover costs. - Alderman Morgan asked about capacity to update the manual; Durfee said staff would draft. - Alderman Tebow questioned the burden on applicants to reduce SOV use; clarified it's voluntary for those seeking relief. - Alderman Greg suggested sharing feedback from developers and the public. - The committee discussed presenting the case study to the full board and other committees. Key Outcomes - Ordinance O-26-019 was recommended for approval and passage by unanimous vote (4-0). - The committee received the parking presentation with positive feedback and will continue discussions at future meetings. - Staff will finalize the mobility management manual and return with updates. Remarks by Aldermen - Alderman Sullivan thanked Alderman Greg for attending to make quorum. - Alderman Morgan and others expressed gratitude to the Nashua Fire Department for their response to a fire on Orange Street, noting professionalism and calmness. Alderman Morgan highlighted the city's four firefighters per truck, a state best. Adjournment - The meeting adjourned at 8:04 PM after a unanimous roll call vote (Aldermen Morgan, Greg, Sullivan, Tebow all yes).

The Human Affairs Committee met on July 20, 2026, at 7:00 PM in the Aldermanic Chamber to receive an update on the proposed Resource Center, Warming Station, and Transitional Housing project. The meeting was chaired by Alderman Lopez and included Aldermen Morgan, Sonnet, Rivan, Kelly, and Johnson, along with staff from Administrative Services, Community Development, and Public Health. The presentation led to extensive discussion about project scope, funding, timeline, and alternative approaches. The meeting adjourned at 9:10 PM. Presentation on Resource Center Project - Director Tim Cummings (Administrative Services) presented a high-level overview of the project, which includes three components: a warming station for 30–50 individuals, a seven-day-a-week resource center connecting individuals to services, and transitional housing (temporary housing bridging emergency shelter to permanent housing). - Estimated budget: land acquisition ($1 million), hard construction costs at $800/sq ft for 5,000 sq ft ($4 million), soft costs and contingency ($800,000), totaling between $5 and $6 million. - Funding sources: $1.2 million secured from congressional directed spending (HUD) pending acceptance, a $2 million state grant application to New Hampshire Housing Finance Authority (due January 2027), and a city contribution of approximately $3 million (not currently included in the ad hoc capital plan). - Timeline: If site selection is completed by spring 2027, design would take about a year, construction 6–12 months, with occupancy possible by spring 2029. The state grant requires the project to be substantially defined, with zoning approval and other conditions met before application. Discussion Items - Alderman Morgan asked why the project is not in the ad hoc capital plan; Director Cummings noted it has not been prioritized but the plan is dynamic and can be updated. - Alderman Kelly inquired about the $1.2 million HUD funding: Director Bagley explained that the original request was for $3.6 million for a three-story facility with shelter beds, but the reduced award led to removing the shelter bed component to focus on the resource center and transitional housing. She also noted the HUD funds can be used within eight years. - Alderman Sonnet asked about the feasibility of phasing the project; Director Sullivan and Cummings agreed that phasing is possible but may not be cost-effective and could complicate funding alignment. - Alderman Kelly expressed concerns about a reactionary approach and advocated for a comprehensive gap analysis (legislation 2649) before committing to a specific project. Director Bagley countered that the city has been studying this for years and that the resource center model is based on best practices. - Alderman Lopez highlighted the need for a coordinated plan, noting that the city's camping ban creates a moral obligation to provide shelter. He also discussed the challenges of using Elm Street Middle School for shelter due to code requirements and high renovation costs. - Alderman Johnson questioned the $6 million cost estimate, recalling that the Mulberry Street property was listed for $730,000 and renovation estimates were $4.5 million. She suggested exploring city-owned properties or existing buildings (e.g., the library) to reduce costs and accelerate the timeline. - Alderman Morgan proposed a hypothetical mixed-use development on a city-owned site (e.g., near public health) with parking and the resource center, but Director Cummings noted that would be a $15–20 million project, materially different from the current proposal. - Director Cummings suggested a phased approach: identify a property, put it under agreement (cost $1 million), then conduct a 90-day limited design study to provide more confidence on costs and feasibility before committing to full construction. This would not preclude applying for the $1.2 million HUD funds. - Director Bagley announced that a community partner has offered space for a temporary resource center (showers, bathrooms) as a proof of concept, potentially starting in September 2026, using existing trust funds. This would address daytime needs while the permanent project is developed. Key Outcomes - No formal votes were taken. The committee directed staff to continue site evaluation and to explore the phased approach (option agreement plus limited design) as a way to advance the project with more certainty. - The committee expressed interest in a special meeting before the full Board of Aldermen to share updates, particularly regarding the temporary resource center offer from a community partner. - The gap analysis (legislation 2649) will proceed through the Personnel/Administrative Affairs Committee and is expected to inform the broader strategy within 90 days. - Staff will work to refine the project scope and cost estimates, with an emphasis on speed, cost-effectiveness, and alignment with community needs.

Note: The transcript indicates the meeting was called to order at 9:00 AM on Thursday, July 16, 2026, but the provided timestamp for this summary is 2026-07-17T10:19:49+00:00. The summary below uses the July 17 date as instructed. The Nashua Board of Assessors met on July 17, 2026, with members Robert Early, Jay McCara, and Charles Dobbins present. The board reviewed and acted on several abatement requests, denials, and a current use application, and heard public comment. The meeting also included a discussion on an administrative abatement for a manufactured home that was ultimately tabled. Consent Calendar - Minutes Approval: The board unanimously approved the minutes from the May 7, 2026 meeting. Public Comments & Testimony - Peter Jacobson (3 Bartamus Trail, Apt. 206, Nashua) addressed the board regarding his late-filed tax abatement request under the disabled veterans exemption. He is a 100% permanently and totally disabled veteran. He acknowledged the late submission but requested leniency under RSA 72:35 (accident, mistake, or misfortune) due to life events: traveling to Colorado to support his father during a bone marrow transplant and his own hospitalization in early April. He stated he owned the property since July 2025 and was unfamiliar with the filing deadline. The board did not deliberate on his request during the public session. Discussion Items - Abatement Approvals (Data Corrections): - 64 Coburn Woods: Inspector Jessica and Kevin conducted an inspection, correcting floor, bedroom, bathroom, kitchen, attic, and other details. Value reduced from $540,000 to $515,000. Approved unanimously. - 60 Timber Lanes: Inspection revealed deferred maintenance, correcting flooring, bathroom count/condition, kitchen condition, basement square footage, garage, and pool. Value reduced from $663,800 to $628,100. Approved unanimously. - Abatement Approvals (Market-Based): - 3 Teresa Way and 5 Teresa Way (part of a five-unit condominium development): Assessor Bob Gagne explained that four newer units were over-assessed compared to recent sales ($695,000–$720,000). The two units that filed for abatement were recommended for reduction. 3 Teresa Way: from $840,100 to $699,800 (refund $2,361.25 plus interest). 5 Teresa Way: from $875,500 to $729,200 (refund $2,462.23 plus interest). The two non-filing units had values adjusted for 2026. Approved unanimously. - Denial of Abatements: The board considered a list of denial recommendations. Addresses included 188 Bartemas Trail, 35 Walden Pond Drive, 84 Walden Pond Drive, 22 New Dunstable Road, 20 Lake Street, 15 Raymond Street, 23 Raymond Street, 10 Blanchard Street, 73 Avon Drive, 77 Avon Drive, 78 Avon Drive, 9 Warner Street, 20 Academy Drive, 7 Sorel Court Unit 6, 2 Lancaster Drive, 4 Lancaster Drive, 7 Fountain Lane, 41 Berkeley Street, and others. - Discussion on 41 Berkeley Street: The abatement request argued against paying the school portion of taxes based on alleged unconstitutionality. Board members explained that RSA 76:16 abatement is for overassessment, not tax rate challenges, and that such arguments have historically failed in court. The denial was recommended. - Votes: Board member Jay McCara abstained on 15 Raymond Street and 23 Raymond Street. The denial motions passed for all listed addresses. - Current Use Application: - 6 Southgate Drive: The applicant submitted a current use application for a trust. The initial map was non-compliant, but a corrected map was received. The board approved the application, which will be recorded at the registry of deeds. - Administrative Abatement for Manufactured Housing (22 Leanne Street): The board discussed a request from the park owner (Rogers) to abate uncollected taxes on a 1994 double-wide manufactured home that was poorly maintained and slated for demolition. The park intends to remove the unit and replace it with a higher-value unit. The abatement request covered 2024 and 2025 taxes. Board member Celia questioned whether the city could pursue personal collection against the former owner, Laurie Gibbons, rather than abating. Other members noted the park could pay the $4,687.70 in taxes to avoid delay. The board decided to table the item to the August 6, 2026 meeting to allow staff to explore the possibility of preserving personal liability while allowing the demolition to proceed. The motion to table passed unanimously. Key Outcomes - Approved Abatements: 64 Coburn Woods, 60 Timber Lanes, 3 Teresa Way, and 5 Teresa Way (all unanimous). - Denied Abatements: All addresses read into the record (with abstentions on 15 and 23 Raymond Street) were denied. - Approved Current Use Application: 6 Southgate Drive (unanimous). - Tabled Item: 22 Leanne Street (manufactured home abatement) tabled to August 6, 2026 meeting. - Public Comment: Noted; no immediate action taken.

The Board of Aldermen met on July 14, 2026, with 14 members present and one absent, constituting a quorum. The meeting included approval of several routine communications, second readings of resolutions and ordinances, public comment on homelessness and the camping ban, and board member remarks. Consent Calendar - Accepted and placed on file: communications from the Senior Traffic Engineer regarding no parking on sections of Selena Avenue; from the Director of Public Works regarding referrals from resolutions R-26-43 and R-26-46; from the Planning Manager regarding the NIMCO site development agreement; and from the Community Development Director regarding the Business and Industrial Development Authority recommendation. - Approved renewal of a contract with Vector Solutions for Fire Rescue online training software (not to exceed $79,546.29). - Approved a three-year contract with ADS Environmental Services for collection system flow monitoring (not to exceed $329,500). Public Comments & Testimony - Andy Prollman (attorney for Lansing Melbourne Group) described the amended development plan for the NIMCO site, noting that the acquisition of the adjacent Bagshaw property allows splitting one building into two with a public road, creating a grid neighborhood. He stated the change provides flexibility for the developer and has received positive recommendations from the finance committee, planning board, and BIDA. - Eric Bozanin (speaker name unclear) expressed opposition to the cellular antenna lease in Mine Falls Park, arguing it is ironic to allow antennas while the city recently passed a camping ban; he stated that human lives are more valuable than antennas and that the ban has forced people deeper into the woods. - Patrice Noel (Nashua resident, age 71) stated she is on the verge of homelessness, called the camping ban a band-aid, and requested the city increase shelter beds, provide more social services, and address the three-to-five-year wait for affordable housing. She noted New Hampshire’s homeless rate is 15 per 10,000 people. - Tim Berger (Nashua resident) urged the board to consider that homelessness can happen to anyone and asked for real solutions, noting that some unhoused people decline services because they do not want to give up pets. - Ben Heaney (Ward 5 resident) demanded repeal of the “survival bans,” citing reports of people being woken up at night, having property destroyed, and being driven to Manchester. He stated that repeal would cost nothing and asked the board to engage with affected individuals. - Eve Arnold (Ward 4 resident) called the camping ban and $1,000 fine cruel, and stated that housing is a resource with inelastic demand; she urged the board to work for repeal. - Matt Goyet (DSA member, Nashua resident) stated the DSA will continue to demand repeal of the camping ban, criticized the proposed homelessness committee as a delay tactic, and called for using vacant buildings like the mill building next to Clock Tower for housing. He thanked Aldermen Lopez, Kelly, and Bagley for caring about the issue. - Kevin Boardman (Ward 4 resident, DSA member) called out several aldermen by name, accusing them of criminalizing survival, and stated that people are dying and freezing. He said the American dream is dead because of those who voted for the ban. - Billy Del Molin (Nashua resident) asked board members to raise their hands if they believe housing is a human right, and criticized the ban for sending people to prison for fines they cannot pay. - Rolf Van Fiber (former unhoused Nashua resident) stated he is qualified to speak on homelessness, argued that the camping ban actively harms people, and that the DSA is launching a platform for housing for all. - Patience Corbett (DSA member, Nashua resident) urged repeal of the camping ban, and criticized the board for only requiring 20% affordable housing in new developments, noting that HUD’s minimum is 20% but the city could require more, such as 80% or 100%. - Samson Rachopi (Nashua resident, U.S. Army veteran, newly licensed attorney) raised concerns about transparency: he filed a right-to-know request for a log of public records requests and found that an Inklink news request from mid-May was missing from the log. He also referenced the camping ban as a city’s character issue and offered to help residents who feel stonewalled. - Christopher Smith (Nashua resident) stated he is not camping but just trying to sleep, and criticized an alderman for bullying behavior on a YouTube video. He said he is not a nobody. - Laurie Ordolano (Nashua resident) criticized the board for setting affordable housing at 80% AMI instead of 60% AMI, questioned why the resource center plan was abandoned after an April fire, and accused the administration of lacking transparency. She also criticized Alderman Gregg for laughing and clapping during the mayor’s remarks at a budget hearing, and stated she has made many suggestions that were not taken. - Stephen Scare (Nashua resident) responded to Alderman Thibault’s past comments, accusing him of supporting an ideology that forces girls to compete against boys and chemically castrates children. He stated that calling them “hateful” does not change the fact that trans women are men. - Beth Scare (Nashua resident) expressed sadness over the loss of a transgender niece, and argued that medical transition does not address root causes of trauma. She called for protecting female-only spaces and criticized the support of former Representative Stacy Lawton. Discussion Items - Second Reading of R-26-047 (NIMCO Site Development Agreement): The resolution authorized an amended and restated master development agreement with Lansing Melbourne Group. Director of Economic Development Liz Hanneman explained that the original plan for one 254-unit building is being split into two buildings (107 and 135 units) on the NIMCO property, totaling 242 units (12 fewer). The developer also purchased the adjacent Bagshaw property and agreed to include 20% affordable units there as well (estimated 20–30 additional affordable units). Affordable units will be spread throughout both buildings. Alderman Lopez expressed concern that the project was moving from 254 units to 242 units and that the affordable housing count dropped by one unit, but later noted the additional affordable units on the Bagshaw property. Alderman Johnson asked for data on where future tenants are from; Director Hanneman stated that the city does not track that data. Alderman Morgan clarified that the buildings are not yet built and the developer agreed to add affordable units on the Bagshaw property. The resolution passed unanimously. - Second Reading of O-26-015 (No Parking on Selena Avenue): Alderman Johnson moved final passage, explaining that the restriction is only a small section needed for USPS tractor-trailers to back in. The ordinance passed unanimously. - New Business – First Readings: R-26-049 (establishing a homeless services gap analysis committee) was assigned to the Personnel and Administrative Affairs Committee. R-26-050 (transfer of $35,000 to the Nashua Association for the Elderly) was assigned to the Budget Review Committee. R-26-051 (auctioning tax-deeded property) introduced. O-26-020 (allowing overnight on-street parking in Ward 5 from May 1 to October 31) was assigned to Personnel and Administrative Affairs. O-26-022 (establishing a video display sign overlay district) was assigned to Planning and Economic Development, with a public hearing set for August 18, 2026. Key Outcomes - R-26-038 (conveyance of discontinued portions of Major Drive and Spaulding Street) – Final passage approved. - R-26-043 (fourth amendment to site lease with New Singular Wireless PCS LLC for cellular antenna at Mine Falls Park) – Final passage approved. - R-26-047 (amended master development agreement with Lansing Melbourne Group for NIMCO site) – Final passage approved unanimously. - O-26-015 (no parking on sections of Selena Avenue) – Final passage approved. - New resolutions and ordinances (R-26-049, R-26-050, R-26-051, O-26-020, O-26-022) introduced and assigned to committees for further review. - Board members expressed support for a decorum training session (Alderman Morgan) and echoed calls for respectful dialogue. Alderman Clemens shared a personal note about his wife’s passing, thanking colleagues for their support. - Public comment focused heavily on the camping ban, with multiple speakers urging its repeal; several board members indicated they are open to amending the ordinance, such as reducing the fine, but no immediate action was taken.

The meeting, held on July 15, 2026, addressed a series of special exception and variance requests for residential and commercial properties across Nashua, New Hampshire. The board heard 10 cases, approving 9 and denying 1. Key decisions included approvals for a deck replacement in a wetland buffer, a new shed/garage exceeding accessory use limits, a larger deck in a prime wetland buffer, sign variances for the Humane Society, a carriage house addition, driveway widening on two properties, and a carport for a disabled veteran. A use variance for a convenience store/smoke shop was also approved. The only denial was a request to subdivide a lot and build a new home, due to inconsistency with the R18 zoning district character and neighbor opposition. Public Comments & Testimony - Putney Deck (Special Exception): No public comments; no opposition. - Stewart Shed/Garage (Variance): Two letters of support from neighbors (Mr. & Mrs. Hardy at 11 Hio Avenue and Mary Levine at 27 Indiana Drive) expressing no concerns. - Zellers Deck (Special Exception): Two letters of support from neighbors (Janet Veluouk at 41 Royce Street and the Percivelis at 36 Roy Street). - Humane Society Signs (Variance): One letter of opposition from Julie Blackwell at 9 Heidi Way, objecting to the sign size as not conforming to the residential neighborhood and arguing that shelter visits are not spontaneous. The applicant responded that the sign is necessary for visibility and many people discover the facility by driving by. - Coustas Carriage House (Variance): Two letters of support from neighbors (Ruthie Lyons at 6 Catherine Street and Cynthia Gale at 4 Catherine Street), both stating 100% favor. - Bertrand Driveway (Variance): No public comments or letters. - Speziferi Driveway (Variance): One letter of support from Stephen and Elaine Tardiff at 1 Candia Street, stating no issues. - Feehan Subdivision (Variances): Several letters of support and opposition. Supporters: Bill Dopkus (former resident), Amy and Mark Dupree (122 Lily Road), and the Sheputz (116 Lily Road). Opponents: Mary Joe Tetter (118 Lily Road) expressed concern about property values; Kevin Morrissey (119 Lily Road) argued the variances would create non-conforming lots and harm neighborhood character; Fred Goforth (123 Lily Road) stated the proposal does not meet legal variance standards; Attorney William Barry (representing the Morrisseys) argued no special conditions exist and the request is purely economic. An additional opposition letter from Richard Jackson (3 Shakespeare Road) was read, citing overcrowding and precedent. - Duvall Carport (Variances): One letter of support from Dan and Julie at 55 Baldwin Street. - Zacharopoulos Smoke Shop (Use Variance): The building owner (Vasilius Jaroblos) spoke in favor, noting the space had been vacant for a long time and he wanted a reliable tenant. Discussion Items - Putney Deck (Special Exception): Board members noted the project is straightforward, same footprint, and the Conservation Commission gave a favorable recommendation with no additional requests. The applicant signed a wetland buffer encroachment affidavit. - Stewart Shed/Garage (Variance): Board members observed the lot is small, the shed will replace a smaller plastic shed, and the design fits the neighborhood. The accessory use limit is meant to prevent clutter, but attaching the shed to the house would avoid the issue. The lot's small size and large house create special conditions. - Zellers Deck (Special Exception): The board found the 20-square-foot increase reasonable, and the Conservation Commission had approved with five stipulations. The deck is not visible from the street. - Humane Society Signs (Variance): The board noted the building is doubling in size (from 9,500 to about 20,000 sq ft), the signs are not internally lit (except a lit logo), and the ground sign on Ferry Road is small and easy to miss. The sign will help wayfinding, especially for the new clinic entrance. The large ask is reasonable given the building scale. - Coustas Carriage House (Variance): The lot is the largest in the neighborhood and the carriage house is barely visible from the road. The addition is minor (993 sq ft), and the architecture is consistent with the existing structure. - Bertrand Driveway (Variance): The property fronts on two streets (Kinsley and New Dunstable). Speeds on Kinsley Street are high, so a second driveway on the safer side enhances safety. The additional width is on a different street. - Speziferi Driveway (Variance): The house is situated at a kitty-corner angle, making it impossible to meet the 20-foot setback from the front property line. The applicant will landscape the widened area. The existing curb cut is maintained. - Feehan Subdivision (Variances): Board members expressed sympathy for the applicants' desire to stay in the neighborhood but could not find special conditions unique to the property. The lot is not oversized; it is the same size as surrounding R18 lots. The proposal would create a non-conforming lot in a zone intended for larger lots. Neighbor opposition was strong. The board noted the applicants could expand their existing house horizontally instead. - Duvall Carport (Variances): The applicant's wife explained her husband is a disabled veteran who needs a special vehicle with a gull-wing door. The carport is the only feasible location due to the lot configuration (curved street, short driveway). The direct neighbor supports it. The board found no other location on the property would work. - Zacharopoulos Smoke Shop (Use Variance): The board clarified that the term "smoke shop" here means a convenience store that sells tobacco/vape products, not a lounge where smoking occurs. The building owner had difficulty keeping tenants. The convenience store is allowed in the LB zone; the variance is for the smoke shop component (vape products). The board noted that many convenience stores sell these items anyway. Key Outcomes - Putney Deck (Special Exception): Approved unanimously. Motion by Mr. Boucher, second by Mr. Lionel. The decision is subject to a 30-day appeal window. - Stewart Shed/Garage (Variance): Approved unanimously. Motion by Mr. Lanel, second by Mr. Petrie. - Zellers Deck (Special Exception): Approved unanimously. Motion by Mr. Boucher, second by Mr. Petrie. Included stipulation from Conservation Commission's five conditions. - Humane Society Signs (Variance): Approved unanimously. Motion by Mr. Nealing, second by Mr. Petrie. - Coustas Carriage House (Variance): Approved unanimously. Motion by Mr. Petrie, second by Mr. Lynnell. - Bertrand Driveway (Variance): Approved unanimously. Motion by Mr. Neely (implied; the motion was made by a board member who said "I'll take this one"), second by Mr. Boucher. - Speziferi Driveway (Variance): Approved unanimously. Motion by Mr. Boucher, second by Mr. Lanel. - Feehan Subdivision (Variances): Denied. Motion by Mr. Lanel to deny, second by Mr. Neely. All board members voted in favor of denial. The application requested five variances. The board cited lack of special conditions, inconsistency with R18 zoning, and substantial neighbor opposition. The applicants were informed of the 30-day appeal window. - Duvall Carport (Variances): Approved unanimously. Motion by Mr. Neely, second by Mr. Boucher. - Zacharopoulos Smoke Shop (Use Variance): Approved unanimously. Motion by Mr. Neely (or another member; the transcript says "I'll take it" and then motion by Mr. Neely), second by Mr. Petrie. The board noted that no consumption of products on premises is expected. Additionally, the board approved the minutes from the June 23 meeting with minor corrections (Mr. Petrie's changes). The board also noted that the July 31 meeting will be the last for a retiring board member (Carter), who was thanked for 28 years of service. The meeting was adjourned after the business.

The Nashua Planning Board met on July 10, 2026, at 7:00 PM (the meeting was called to order on July 9, 2026, but the recording timestamp indicates July 10). The board approved a subdivision, granted a site plan extension and amendment for a large redevelopment, and gave favorable recommendations on three board of alderman referrals. The meeting concluded at 8:20 PM. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: The board unanimously approved the minutes from the June 4, 2026 meeting. - Communications: An updated engineering comment letter for 63 Arlington Street subdivision was received and noted in the staff report. Discussion Items Board Member Questions on Site Visits and Work Sessions - Joseph McIntyre raised two procedural questions. First, he inquired about the ability of individual board members to conduct site visits and whether the board can schedule formal site walks. Staff clarified that individual visits are permissible as long as there is no trespassing (applicants sign a right of entry), and formal site walks must be publicly noticed and can include staff experts. Second, McIntyre asked about the possibility of annual or semi-annual work sessions to discuss topics like the recode, population trends, and master plan updates. The chair and staff noted that informational sessions can be scheduled on lighter agenda nights, and the board can use the discussion item section of the agenda to raise issues. McIntyre expressed a desire for more interactive board discussions. 63 Arlington Street Subdivision (A26-0104) - Applicant: Alex Trafrida (IMEG) on behalf of Arlington Street Methodist Church. - Description: Subdivision of 0.52-acre church property to create a separate 0.144-acre lot (Lot 53) containing the existing parsonage, which the church wishes to sell. The remaining lot (Lot 67-1) is 0.378 acres. No new site improvements are proposed. A waiver was requested for Section 190-281 D10 (existing conditions of adjacent parcels) due to unnecessary hardship. - Public Testimony: Reverend Sharon Sargent, representing the Granite District of the New England Conference of the United Methodist Church, spoke in favor of the subdivision. - Outcome: The board granted the waiver and unanimously approved the final subdivision plan with conditions. 103 Temple Street Site Plan Extension and Amendment (A26-0132) - Applicant: Ethan Beals (IMEG) and Matt Lavery (Property Possible Inc.) for a 385-unit redevelopment of the former J.F. McElwain Shoe Manufacturing site. - Description: The project seeks a 12-month extension of a previously approved site plan (originally approved July 2023) and an amendment to introduce a phasing plan. Phase One includes Building A (205 units) and associated site improvements, including the Spruce Street connector. Phase Two includes Buildings B and C (180 units total) and remaining improvements. The buildings are independent for utilities and parking. The applicant noted that environmental remediation and financing (NH Housing) are in progress, with construction on Phase One expected to start in August 2026. - Discussion: The board extensively discussed the implications of phasing, particularly whether building permits for Phase One would vest the approval for Phase Two indefinitely. Staff clarified that under the ordinance, "active and substantial development" requires footings for all buildings, so Building B and C would need separate extensions unless the board specifies otherwise. The board decided not to impose additional conditions on the fly and approved the extension and amendment as presented. - Outcome: The board unanimously approved the 12-month site plan extension and the site plan amendment to include the phasing plan. Board of Alderman Referrals - O-26-019: Codifies a $50 fee for environmental health department review of subdivision applications. The board made a favorable recommendation. - R-26-047: Authorizes an amended master development agreement for the NIMCO site (Lansing Melbourne Group). The plan changes from a single 250-unit building to a two-phase project with 242 units total. The revision increases the city's revenue by approximately $1.8 million through non-refundable option payments. The board made a favorable recommendation. - R-26-046: Authorizes the sale of surplus right-of-way (Parcel A) along Veterans Memorial Parkway, which will facilitate development of adjacent parcels. Proceeds must be returned to NHDOT or federal highways. The board made a favorable recommendation. Key Outcomes - 63 Arlington Street Subdivision: Approved with waiver. - 103 Temple Street Site Plan: Extension and amendment approved. - Referrals: All three received favorable recommendations from the board. - Next Meeting: The next regular meeting is scheduled for August 6, 2026 (with cases continued from this meeting). The meeting was adjourned at 8:20 PM.