The Planning Commission met on September 9, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. to consider a consent agenda, the FY2027 proposed budget, and two land-use plan amendments. Commissioner Bustamonte recused himself from consent items 1, 5, and 7. The meeting concluded at 3:32 p.m. Consent Calendar - Motion to approve the combined hearing agenda (items 1–11, except 12, 13, and 15) carried unanimously (7–0). Commissioner Bustamonte was not present for the vote due to recusal. Discussion Items FY2027 Proposed Budget (Item 15) - Craig Dudek, Interim Assistant Director of Management and Budget, presented a $4.4 billion total budget with a $1.76 billion general fund. The city faced a $158 million shortfall over two years due to revenue growth of 2.3% versus expenditure growth of 6.9%. - Strategies to close the gap included: $90 million in spending reductions (101 civilian positions targeted, 54 filled – no layoffs planned), use of the 3.5% property tax increment authority (adding $28M in FY27 and $64M in FY28), and $30 million in fee increases (notably police/fire EMS fees, towing, and a $20 non-resident library card fee). - Average homeowner impact: $2.95/month increase in property taxes; 47% of homesteads exempt due to existing exemptions or frozen values. - Investments: $38.8M for homeless services (including $9M capital for emergency relocation); $37.7M for housing (targeting 29 units, 50% completion of 14,000 home repairs); animal care services (10 new positions, 5.2% increase in spay/neuter surgeries); 27 new airport police officers; conversion of 22 park police vacancies to police officers; $5.4M police overtime reductions; and 9 new fire uniform positions. - Capital budget (Christy Chapman): $1.4 billion, 61% for airport Terminal C. Public Works will deliver 534 street miles, 22 miles of sidewalks, 36 channel restorations, and 44,000 gutter miles swept. Capital Delivery reported 78% of the 2022 bond program complete or under construction; the 2027 bond program will be presented to council on September 30. - Commission vote: Motion to approve passed 7–0 (Bustamonte abstained). I-10 East Corridor Plan Amendment (Item 12) – 4400 block of Nanto Drive - Staff recommendation: Approve the change from urban living to community commercial. The property is adjacent to I-10 and currently has three zoning stripes; the amendment would align with surrounding commercial designations. - Public opposition (three speakers): Joe Most, Amelia Peacock, and Candice Breland argued the change would harm the residential character, increase traffic, and pose safety risks. They noted the land is physically inside their neighborhood and that a previous proposal for a 24-hour gas station/convenience store was incompatible. - Applicant (Hernan Jaramillo): Stated the property was always planned for commercial in the master plan (2009); they withdrew a special-use request for a car wash and now seek only standard C2 zoning (permits retail, restaurants, medical offices – not heavy commercial). - Commission actions: Motion to continue to September 23 failed (4–4). Motion to deny failed (2–6). Motion to approve passed 5–3 (Orion, Cooper, Miller, Siegel, Peck yes; DeSucci, Wallersted, Bustamonte no). Arena District Eastside Community Plan Amendment (Item 13) – 142 Gembler Road - Staff recommendation: Deny the change from community commercial to light industrial, stating the property currently serves as a buffer between residential and industrial uses; eliminating the buffer would allow industrial encroachment. - Applicant (Ken, rodeo representative): The property is used for overflow parking for the San Antonio Stock Show & Rodeo (about one month/year). They need light industrial to accommodate permanent agricultural structures for year-round rodeo activities. The applicant noted the neighborhood association supports the IDZ (infill development zone) request after earlier opposition to full industrial zoning. - Commission discussion: Some commissioners expressed reluctance without written neighborhood support. A motion to continue to September 23 (to obtain a letter of support from the neighborhood association) passed 4–2 (Siegel, Cooper, DeSucci, Miller yes; Orion, Peck no; Bustamonte not recorded; Wallersted had left the meeting at 3:26). Key Outcomes - Consent agenda approved unanimously (7–0). - FY2027 budget approved (7–0, with one abstention). - Item 12 (I-10 East Corridor) approved (5–3). - Item 13 (Arena District) continued to September 23, 2026, to allow the applicant to provide a letter of support from the neighborhood association.
Public Meetings - San Antonio, Texas
Public Meetings - San Antonio, TexasThe City of San Antonio held a budget work session on Wednesday, September 9, 2026, to review proposed fiscal year 2027 budgets for the Parks and Recreation, Economic Development (EDD), Solid Waste Management, and San Antonio Public Library departments. The meeting included presentations by department directors and discussion by Mayor Ron Nirenberg and City Council members. No formal votes were taken. Parks and Recreation Department - Director Homer Garcia presented a proposed total budget of $120.4 million across all funds, with $71.1 million from the general fund (a slight increase over the current year). Key revenue enhancements include fee updates for gyms, sports fields, and mass pavilions (estimated $445,000) and an increase of $0.25 in the environmental fee on CPS bills, projected to generate $2 million. - Proposed reductions and efficiencies total $3.2 million, including a $200,000 decrease in funding to the San Antonio Botanical Garden (tied to a lease agreement ending in 2039), elimination of three vacant positions (equipment operator, marketing specialist, building maintenance supervisor), and transfers of 17 positions to other funds. - Growth funding of $1.1 million will add eight skilled trades and park sanitation positions to maintain 9 miles of new greenway trails (Bidow Creek and Calibra to Helotus Connector). - The department plans $10.4 million from the Tree Canopy Preservation and Mitigation Fund for planting 13,700 trees (including 9,000 adoptions/giveaways, 2,000 residential plantings, and 600 bond project trees). Survival rate for 2025-planted trees is 81% (industry standard). - Edwards Aquifer Protection Program will add 5,500 acres (eight properties) to reach over 190,000 protected acres. - Greenway trails: 106 miles complete, 17 miles funded for construction, and 17 miles remain unfunded to complete the ring. Councilmember Mungia noted District 4 has the largest gap and urged inclusion in a future bond. - Capital projects include year four of a five-year playground shade program (12 locations in six districts), deferred maintenance ($1.725 million including basketball court rehabilitation at Bean Benavitas Park and pool resurfacing at Woodlawn Lake Park), and collaboration with Capital Delivery on HVAC replacements. - Councilmember Castillo requested continued support for a tree assistance program for seniors (funded in FY25 but expended) and was assured by Assistant City Manager David McCary that the Tree Mitigation Fund might support it. - Councilmember Via Gran requested a citywide list of park lease agreements and their return on investment. Economic Development Department - Director Brenda Hicks Lawrence presented a proposed general fund budget of $16.9 million, a 9.6% reduction from FY26. Restricted funds total $7.5 million. - Two positions are eliminated (an economic development manager and a vacant senior specialist) due to process efficiencies from a prior process improvement review. - The department refreshed the Economic Development Strategic Framework with TIP Strategies, to be presented for discussion on October 14, 2026. The framework includes goals for global competitiveness, place-based redevelopment, and economic mobility. - Highlights include: Blackwave (high-tech tanks) announced $95 million investment and 250 jobs at Port San Antonio; a $200 million, 1 million-square-foot manufacturing facility at Brooks (up to 3,000 jobs by 2030). - The $500,000 zero-interest loan program (with LiftFund) continues; since 2016, over 400 loans totaling nearly $14 million have facilitated an estimated $195 million in economic impact. Councilmember Mungia requested data on loan locations and recipients. - A site readiness assessment of 10 sites (8 in District 4) was completed; two to three sites will be targeted for addressing gaps in FY27. - Wolf Stadium redevelopment master plan will be presented later in fall 2026. - Incentive policy updates will be presented to the Economic and Workforce Development Committee on September 22, 2026. - Councilmember Alarcon asked about TURS (Texas Urban Revitalization Strategy) engagement; Mayor encouraged monitoring the economic impact of an ICE facility on the East Side. Solid Waste Management Department - Director Josephine Valencia reported on storm debris cleanup: over 11 million pounds of brush collected in 11 days, with priority area first sweep completed and second sweep ongoing. Bulky collection delays are being resolved. - Proposed budget includes three initiatives: customer growth (2 drivers, 1 truck, $661,000 for an estimated 3,500 new customers); transfer station facility upgrades ($3.1 million one-time to open to private waste haulers, generating revenue); and rate increases ($0.75 per cart, $0.25 environmental fee) and expansion of waste hauler permit fee to recycling trucks (funds go to street maintenance). - Fleet services fund: a new mechanic apprenticeship program aims to reduce outsourcing (in-house cost $95/hour vs. private $150/hour). - Councilmember Corr asked about owning a landfill (deemed impractical; 15-year permitting timeline). Recycling revenue is down due to tariff uncertainty and processor consolidation. - Councilmember Alarcon requested information on shopping cart collection costs and noted that large retailers have reduced cart loss through wheel-locking mechanisms. San Antonio Public Library - Director Sukrit Goswami presented a proposed total budget of $60.8 million, with $58.1 million from the general fund (4% increase). The increase covers COLAs, mandates, and $2.1 million one-time for furniture, fixtures, and equipment. - $400,000 and 4 new positions are allocated for the expanded Carver Branch Library on the East Side. - Efficiencies: $480,000 from reduced software costs (academic pricing); $950,000 from a new branch staffing model that eliminates 39 positions (27 library aid, 12 circulation attendant positions). Of these, 17 are vacant; the 22 affected employees will be offered positions at other city departments with no reduction in pay or tenure. - The staffing model was justified by a 40% decline in physical check-ins and a 62% decline in staff-assisted checkouts since 2019, while digital circulation grew 161%. Library hours, programs, and staffing for librarians, library assistants, and training officers are maintained. - Proposed revenue: increase lost-item processing fee from $5 to $10 (estimated $10,000); new $20 annual fee for library cards for non–San Antonio residents (estimated $1 million). Joanne Harris, Vice Chair of the Library Board of Trustees, spoke in support of continued investment. - Councilmembers raised concerns: Councilmember Castillo requested the council districts of affected employees; Councilmember Galvan noted unease about cutting positions given libraries' roles as community hubs; Councilmember Corr asked for comparisons to other cities (San Antonio was slightly above median staffing per branch before cuts) and a plan to measure customer satisfaction post-change. Councilmember Mickey Rodriguez expressed interest in amendments to preserve all positions. - Mayor Nirenberg asked about the cost to reopen Central Library on Sundays and to make parking free; staff will follow up. Key Outcomes - No formal votes were taken; all presentations were for discussion. - Staff will provide follow-up memos on: library staffing model details by branch, affected employee home districts, customer satisfaction measurement plan; Economic Development loan program locations; Parks tree assistance program funding; list of park lease agreements; and TURS incentive history. - Councilmembers signaled potential budget amendments to restore some library positions and to adjust tax rate, with several supporting a variable rate increase to generate additional revenue. - The next budget work session is scheduled for Thursday, September 10, 2026, with an updated amendment list expected by Friday. - A public hearing on the budget and property tax increase was scheduled for 5:00 p.m. the same day.
The San Antonio Planning Commission met on September 9, 2026, at 2:00 PM. The meeting included approval of the consent agenda, a presentation and vote on the Fiscal Year 2027 budget, and deliberations on two rezoning cases. Commissioners present: Suzuki, Cooper, Miller, Wallester, Oren, Bustamante, Siegel, and President Peck. Commissioner Bustamante temporarily recused himself during the consent agenda vote. Consent Calendar - The consent agenda (all items except 12, 13, and 15) was approved unanimously with a motion by Commissioner Miller and second by Commissioner Siegel. Vote: 7-0 (Commissioner Bustamante absent). Discussion Items Fiscal Year 2027 Proposed Budget (Item 15) - Arturo, representing the city budget office, presented the FY2027 budget, calling it a "challenging financial year." Key points: - Revenue growth projected at 2.3% (down from 6.9%), while expenditures grow at 6.9%. - A $158 million deficit over two years is addressed through a three-part strategy: 1) $90 million in spending reductions (including 150 position cuts, service reductions, and transfers to other funds); 2) property tax revenue increase of 3.5% (the maximum allowed without voter approval under state law), generating $28 million in FY2027 and $65 million in FY2028; 3) fee and tariff increases totaling $39 million, including $20 million from police and fire department fees (e.g., vehicle towing, ambulance) and a $20 annual non-resident library fee. - The city's total proposed budget is $4.4 billion across all funds, compared to $4.06 billion in FY2026. Projected city property tax rate: $2.95 per $100 valuation, with 47% of residents unaffected due to exemptions or homestead freezes. - Investments include $30.8 million for homelessness services (focus on shelters and housing frameworks), $37.7 million for housing (14,000 units targeted by end of FY2027), opening a new animal hospital on the west side (FY2027 winter) with 10 staff and $9 million, adding 27 new police officers and 8 new uniformed firefighter positions, and $129 million for street maintenance (over 1,000 miles of projects). - Capital budget: $1.4 billion, with the largest share for airport (Terminal C construction). Also: $316.6 million for capital delivery in FY2027, including projects from the 2022 bond program (78% completed or under construction). - Commissioners asked questions about fee structures, the Alamodome's funding (supported by hotel occupancy tax), property tax assessment methods (replacement cost vs. appraised value), and traffic safety investments ($1 million for speed controls, considered insufficient by some). - A motion to approve the proposed budget was made by Commissioner Siegel, seconded, and passed unanimously (8-0). Rezoning Case: I-10 East Corridor Plan Amendment (Item 12) - Request to change land use designation from Urban Residential and Community Commercial to C2 (Community Commercial) on a 0.5-acre parcel, to allow commercial development such as convenience stores, medical offices, or auto service. Sixteen notifications sent; no public support or opposition registered officially outside of the hearing. - Four residents spoke in opposition: Joe Moss, Emilia Peacock, Kent Spillan, and another. Concerns included: incompatible adjacent residential neighborhood (Paloma community), narrow streets, lack of traffic calming, drainage stress, potential for a 24-hour gas station or liquor store, and disruption of the "buffer" between I-10 and homes. Speakers emphasized the need to protect the residential character and mentioned the ongoing "San Antonio Tomorrow" comprehensive plan. - The applicant (representative Hernán Jaramio of Bain Medina Bain?) described the property as part of a planned development (MXD) approved in 2009, with existing commercial zoning on the front and rear strips but a residential strip in the middle. He stated no specific development plan yet; the request is simply to rezone to C2 to facilitate sale. He noted that a prior special-use permit for a car wash was withdrawn after community opposition. - Commissioners questioned whether C2 would allow uses like convenience stores without gas stations, and discussed potential alcohol restrictions. A motion to postpone to the next meeting (September 23, 2026) by Commissioner Bustamante failed (3-5: Bustamante, Oren, Siegel in favor; Suzuki, Cooper, Miller, Wallester, Peck opposed). A motion to deny by Commissioner Siegel also failed (2-6: Siegel, Wallester in favor; Suzuki, Cooper, Miller, Oren, Bustamante, Peck opposed). A motion to approve by Commissioner Cooper succeeded (5-3: Suzuki, Cooper, Wallester, Siegel, Peck in favor; Miller, Oren, Bustamante opposed). The rezoning was approved. Rezoning Case: Eastside Community Plan Amendment (Item 13) - Request to change a 40-50 year old parcel from C2 (Community Commercial) to IDZ (Industrial Development Zone) to allow light industrial uses, primarily for parking and future permanent structures for the San Antonio Rodeo. The property is adjacent to a golf course and industrial uses, with a residential neighborhood to the east. Staff recommended denial, citing the need for a transition buffer. - Applicant Ken Brown (representing property owner and Brown McDonald Association) stated that the neighborhood association was consulted via monthly meetings and that the rodeo needs additional year-round space. He submitted an updated site plan showing the buffer area, but commissioners expressed uncertainty about whether the buffer would be maintained. - No public speakers registered. - Commissioner Siegel requested a letter of support from the community, noting past passionate opposition to similar changes. A motion to postpone to September 23, 2026, by Commissioner Siegel was seconded and passed (5-3: Siegel, Cooper, Suzuki, Miller, Bustamante in favor; Wallester, Oren, Peck opposed). The item is continued to the next meeting. Key Outcomes - Consent Agenda: Approved unanimously. - FY2027 Budget (Item 15): Approved unanimously (8-0). The budget includes $90 million in reductions, property tax increase of 3.5%, and $39 million in fee increases, with a target to close the $158 million deficit and achieve a $48.9 million fund balance by FY2028. - I-10 East Corridor Rezoning (Item 12): Approved (5-3). The property will be rezoned to C2. No specific development plan is associated; future uses will require compliance with C2 regulations. - Eastside Rezoning (Item 13): Postponed to the September 23, 2026 Planning Commission meeting, pending a letter of community support. - Meeting adjourned at 3:32 PM.
The San Antonio City Council Zoning and Land Use Session was called to order at 2:08 PM on Thursday, September 3, 2026. The meeting covered continuation of a case, consent agenda approval, and individual hearings on two major rezoning items. Mayor Pro Tem presided with a quorum present. The meeting adjourned at 2:51 PM. Consent Calendar - Item 8 was continued to the September 17, 2026 meeting by a motion and second, without council discussion. - The remaining consent agenda items (items 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 16) were approved by a single motion without council discussion. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 7 (829 West Harlan Avenue): Two speakers addressed the council before the consent agenda vote. Judas Garcia (resident at 828 West Harlan) requested denial of the proposed zoning change, citing increased density, traffic, parking pressure, noise, and construction activity on a small street. He asked for the property to be removed from the application or for protections including setbacks and parking considerations. Jack Finger supported the previous speaker and urged Councilmember Castillo to deny the rezoning, noting the proposal for three dwelling units would intensify the area. - Items 1 and 2 (Blanco Corridor rezoning): Several residents spoke in opposition. Jeanette Bada (810 Elmwood Drive) requested denial, highlighting the neighborhood's high homeownership rate (63.4% vs. 47.7% in District 1 and 52.2% citywide) and low resident turnover (6.7% moved in the past year vs. 16.6% in District 1). She also noted that notifications were not accessible enough for residents to understand the zoning change. April Maldonado (825 Westwood Drive, a realtor) opposed the RM4 designation for residential blocks, arguing it contradicts the North Central Community Plan which prohibits encroachment. She presented a petition with 95% opposition from homes she visited and requested denial or a continuance for further neighborhood discussion. Esther de Leon (former Edison Neighborhood Association board member) said the initial community meetings only discussed commercial properties, not the change from single-family to quadplex zoning. She noted lots are too small for quadplexes and would not blend with the 1930s-era homes. Kendra Swords (817 Westwood Drive) opposed RM4, stating it would allow up to four units per lot, 35-foot heights, and devalue long-term family investments. She asked to preserve single-family R4 zoning. Jack Finger also opposed, questioning the compatibility of a candy manufacturing use near an auto body shop. Lisa Talley (North Central Neighborhood Association president) stated the association stands with opposed residents, opposing encroachment that changes neighborhood aesthetics and property tax values. Discussion Items - Items 1 and 2 (Blanco Corridor Plan Amendment and Rezoning): Staff presented a large area rezoning from multiple zoning districts to RM4 and other commercial districts, bounded by Fresno Street, Hildebrand Avenue, and extending about 300 feet east and west of Blanco Road. 306 notices were mailed; 10 in favor, 24 opposed. The North Central Neighborhood Association opposed; the Beacon Hill Area Neighborhood Association requested a continuance. An additional 26 notices outside the 200-foot buffer were opposed. Staff, Zoning Commission, and Planning Commission recommended approval with seven specific properties excluded. Councilmember Corr (District 1) explained the process began from a resident's request to rezone her home from industrial to allow a rehab loan. She stated her team block-walked multiple times and 80% of residents spoken to were supportive or neutral. She asked DSD staff to clarify RM4 height restrictions (35 feet, same as single-family districts) and that multiple units must be in a single structure; lots under 4,000 square feet cannot have more than one unit without separate entitlement. She also noted any demolition requires a permit reviewed by the Office of Historic Preservation. She moved to approve as amended. - Items 14 and 15 (Classen Road Fitness Center): Staff presented a plan amendment and rezoning from C3NA to C2 with specific use authorization for a fitness center/health club with outdoor uses at 15234 Classen Road. 12 notices were mailed; 1 in favor, 0 opposed. Outside the 200-foot buffer, 2 in favor, 1 opposed. Staff, Zoning Commission, and Planning Commission recommended approval with downward facing lighting. Douglas Welch (Briarwick Neighborhood Association) spoke, noting he and the applicant agreed on a restrictive covenant addressing outdoor play hours, noise, and lighting. He requested the neighborhood stay involved during the permit and traffic study phases, citing constraints from railroad tracks, floodplain, and bridge guardrails. Councilmember White (District 10) acknowledged the collaborative work and moved to approve with amendments: compliance with city noise ordinance (9 PM to 6 AM), outdoor music/noise ceasing at 9 PM, business operations moving indoors at 10 PM, and downward facing lighting. Key Outcomes - Item 8 continued to September 17, 2026 (motion carried without opposition). - Consent agenda (items 3-7, 9-13, 16) approved unanimously. - Items 1 and 2 (Blanco Corridor rezoning) approved as amended by motion from Councilmember Corr, with a second. No further council discussion. Vote carried. - Items 14 and 15 (Classen Road fitness center) approved with conditions (noise restrictions, lighting) by motion from Councilmember White, with a second. No further council discussion. Vote carried.
The San Antonio City Council met on September 3, 2026, at 9:01 AM. The meeting included an invocation, approval of prior minutes, recognitions, a city manager's report, and a consent agenda. The primary contested item was the designation of the Esperanza Community Land Trust (CLT), which was ultimately approved after a failed motion to postpone. Consent Calendar - Approval of minutes from the City Council meetings of August 13 and 18, 2026. - Items 5–15 on the consent agenda were approved as a group, except Item 15 which was pulled for individual consideration. - Councilmember McKee Rodriguez highlighted Item 12, appointing Joe Bravo to the Midtown TIRZ, noting his advocacy and experience. Public Comments & Testimony - Graciela Sanchez (Esperanza Peace and Justice Center) spoke in favor of the CLT designation, recalling the 2014 displacement of residents from Mission Trails Mobile Home Park and arguing that the CLT model prevents displacement. She stated that the Esperanza CLT focuses on households earning up to 30% of AMI. - Renee Gonzalez (General Manager, Esperanza CLT) presented photos of properties needing rehabilitation, explaining that the CLT's focus on rehabbing existing homes is cost-effective and preserves cultural legacy. He noted that the CLT owns 11 properties, with two currently occupied. - Leticia Sanchez (Historic West Side Residents Association) expressed support, stating that residents feel vulnerable and are eager to participate in the CLT to retain homeownership and avoid code compliance issues. - Jasmine Hereda (beneficiary) shared a personal story of how the CLT helped her pay off her mortgage after losing her job due to COVID-19, keeping her family's home. - Jack Finger opposed the designation, criticizing the Esperanza organization's history and calling the approval a "giveaway" of taxpayer dollars. He was reminded to stay on topic. Discussion Items - City Manager's Report – Eric Walsh reported on the city's response to the August 28–29 storm: 2,000 tons of brush moved, 3,500 storm damage calls, 740 properties assessed, and 24-hour operations at 311. He thanked Deputy City Manager Maria Villa Gomez for her leadership. He also noted that 1,300 residents attended budget town halls, an 11% increase over last year. - Item 15 – Esperanza Community Land Trust Designation – Veronica Garcia, Director of Neighborhood and Housing Services, presented the CLT model. She explained that the Esperanza CLT was founded in 2022, serves the historic West Side, and targets households earning up to 30% AMI (about $25,000/year for a family of three). The CLT was awarded $681,000 in housing bond funds in April 2026, but cannot access them without this designation. The CLT is not requesting a property tax exemption at this time. It currently owns 11 properties (two occupied) and plans to rehab three per year over three years. - Councilmember Viegadon moved to postpone the item to the first available B session in October, citing the need to study state legislation, ensure consensus on TIRZ roles, and understand fiscal impacts if a tax exemption is later sought. She expressed concern that the CLT is more of a rehab project than a land bank, and questioned the pace of progress. - Councilmember Castillo opposed the delay, noting that the funding was already approved in April and that the designation is a routine step. Councilmember Galvan supported immediate approval, praising the due diligence by staff and the CLT's focus on extremely low-income residents. Councilmember McKee Rodriguez argued that consistency matters, as two other CLTs were approved earlier this year without similar scrutiny. Councilmember Mungia echoed trust in staff and noted the long-standing need for CLTs in San Antonio. - Graciela Sanchez responded to the delay motion, stating that the CLT has already acquired 10 properties and that other CLTs with fewer properties were approved without delay, suggesting animus toward the Esperanza organization. Key Outcomes - Storm Response – The city manager's report was received without formal action, but council members expressed gratitude to staff and partners. - Consent Agenda – Approved (except Item 15). - Item 15 – Esperanza Community Land Trust Designation – A motion to postpone to the first B session in October failed (vote not tallied in transcript). The original motion to approve the designation carried (vote not tallied). The designation allows the CLT to use the $681,000 housing bond award and proceed with rehabilitating homes for households earning up to 30% of AMI.
The San Antonio Zoning Board convened on September 3, 2026, at 2:00 PM, with Acting Mayor presiding and a quorum present. The meeting addressed several zoning cases, including a postponement, a consent agenda, and two individually heard items involving rezonings and plan amendments. Public testimony was heard on multiple items, and the board approved the consent agenda and both individual cases with conditions. Postponement - Item 8 was postponed to the September 8, 2026 meeting via a motion that passed without discussion. No public testimony was heard on this item. Consent Calendar - The consent agenda included items 1, 2, 14, and 15 (later pulled for individual hearing) as well as items 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 16. A motion to approve the consent agenda passed unanimously after public comments on item 7. - Item 7 (829 West Harland): Two speakers opposed the rezoning, citing traffic, noise, privacy, and construction impacts. Despite these objections, the item was included in the approved consent calendar. Public Comments & Testimony - Items 1 & 2 (Blanco Road corridor): Six speakers opposed the rezoning and plan amendment. They argued the change would increase density, alter neighborhood character, raise property taxes, and contradict the North Central Community Plan. Speakers included residents, a real estate agent, and the president of the North Central Neighborhood Association. - Items 14 & 15 (1532 Clausen Road): One speaker, Stan Welch (Bowery Neighborhood Association), expressed initial concerns but stated that an agreement had been reached with the applicant regarding hours, noise, and lighting. He requested continued involvement in site planning. Discussion Items - Points 1 & 2: Council Member Corr (District 1) spoke in favor of the rezoning, describing extensive community outreach (walkthroughs, meetings, and office hours since February 2026). He clarified that R4 zoning allows single-family, duplex, triplex, and fourplex units in a single structure up to 35 feet tall, with height limited to adjacent homes. He noted that 80% of contacted residents were neutral or supportive, and that properties whose owners opposed were removed from the rezoning request. A motion to approve was made and seconded. - Points 14 & 15: Council Member White (District 10) acknowledged the work between the developer and neighborhood association to establish conditions. He moved to approve the rezoning with the following conditions: noise restrictions from 9 PM to 6 AM, outdoor music must end by 9 PM, all operations must be indoors by 10 PM, and lighting restrictions. The motion was seconded. Key Outcomes - Postponement: Item 8 postponed to September 8, 2026 (unanimous). - Consent Calendar: Approved unanimously, including item 7 over public opposition. - Points 1 & 2: Motion to approve the plan amendment and rezoning (multiple properties along Blanco Road) passed. The board did not separately vote on each parcel. - Points 14 & 15: Motion to approve the plan amendment and rezoning for 1532 Clausen Road (gym/sports facility) with conditions (noise, hours, lighting) passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 2:51 PM.
The San Antonio Building Standards Board (Junta de Normas de Construcción) convened on September 3, 2026 at 9:00 AM? (start time not specified, quorum established). The board approved the minutes from the August 6, 2026 meeting, received a staff report on emergency demolitions, and then heard and decided on six individual property cases involving code violations, structural hazards, and public safety concerns. All motions passed unanimously with 7-0 votes, except for one case that was reset for further review. Consent Calendar - The board unanimously approved the minutes of the August 6, 2026 meeting as presented. Staff Report: Emergency Demolitions - Staff reported five emergency demolitions conducted between July 28 and August 15, 2026, all involving vacant main structures damaged by fire or structural failure. Properties included: - 1717 Moctezuma Street (District 5) – fire July 28, demolished July 31. - 2435 Christian Drive (District 3) – fire July 21, demolished July 31. - 4902 Lark Avenue (District 7) – fire July 29, demolished August 7. - 427 Armadillo Alley (District 2) – structural failure August 4, demolished August 12. - 129 Jesse Street (District 6) – fire August 11, demolished August 15. - Discussion noted that fencing and foliage damage at 1717 Moctezuma were the owner’s responsibility and were not addressed by the city. Public Comments & Testimony - For 203 Goodleaf Street: No public comments were made. - For 403 Cliff Avenue: Neighbor Roberto Perez (District 3) testified about long-standing blight, safety concerns, and his own property damage. Owner Doris Tapia stated she is 61, disabled, has sold the property, and disputed some allegations, claiming she had applied for city repair assistance and that code enforcement damaged her home. - For 1139 West Mulberry Avenue: Neighbor Cynthia Walker (Beacon Hill, District 1) testified about past illegal activity and concern for current tenants lacking water and electricity. Owner John Cano detailed his purchase in April 2024, $80,000 invested, and ongoing repairs. He requested 60 days to complete work. - For 1404 North Olive Street: Neighbors Lucrecia Cisneros and Gabriel Rodriguez (District 2) testified about frequent vagrant activity, fires, graffiti, and proximity to a juvenile academy within 250 feet. They urged emergency demolition. - For 1847 Macaulay Avenue: Josh Martinez (military residence, grew up in District 4) expressed interest in purchasing the property and restoring it. Francisco Lopez (District 1 and 4, a design professional representing the Martinez family) presented an initial scope of work and requested a case reset to allow time for title resolution and financing. - For 5475 Jose Lane: No public testimony. Discussion Items 203 Goodleaf Street (District 1) - Code officer Ramiro Guerra reported violations including dangerous electrical systems, plumbing hazards, structural issues (porch collapse risk), and excessive use of extension cords. Property owner Jesús Rodriguez is deceased; a relative Rudy Domínguez left the property. Police officer Juan Hernández (Central Station) testified that the property had received 129 service calls for drug activity, weapons, and disturbances; 15 people were arrested during an April 28 joint operation with DPS, including three on narcotics warrants. Cleanup cost $198 was pending. The board amended the initial motion (presented by Fred Andes) to require eviction within 30 days, securing the property, suspension of all utilities, and payment of cleanup fees. The motion passed 7-0. 403 Cliff Avenue (District 2) - Code officer (unnamed in transcript) presented the property as a first-time recommendation for demolition. The declared owner is Doris Tapia (also listed as Doris B. Tapia). The structure (built 1938) showed severe damage: broken windows, roof exposure, mold, structural decay, and interior hazards. Found syringes and live ammunition on August 20, 2026, and location within 1,000 feet of three schools (high school, two elementary schools). Cleanup cost $4,400 had been done once. Police officer (Guillén, 26 years service) reported many calls for drug activity, a fire, and arrest of a person claiming ownership on drug charges. The owner presented no financial plan or work scope but mentioned she had sold the property. The board motion (by Robert Banke) for demolition within 30 days, eviction, utility disconnect, and site cleanup was passed 7-0. 1139 West Mulberry Avenue (District 1) - Code officer Crystal Town presented the case as a second appearance (first in June 2024). The property is owned by John Cano. Violations included structural settling, stucco cracks, exposed subfloor, unsafe electrical extensions, lack of hot water, and an accessory structure used as storage with debris. No engineer’s compliance letter was provided for foundation repairs; some work was done without permits. The board entered a brief executive session (10:15–10:21) for legal consultation and resumed. Owner John Cano testified to his investments ($80,000) and requested 60 days. The board motion (by Fred Andes) required repair within 30 days, with all permits obtained, and the property to remain vacant until work completion. The motion passed 7-0. 1404 North Olive Street (District 2) - Code officer Cynthia Santana presented a first-time demolition recommendation. The property, owned by Central Florida Lending Funding (Florida), has been abandoned since an arson fire in November 2024. No utilities, extensive fire damage, roof collapse, structural decay, and vagrant entry. Four cleanups had been performed; two work orders were pending. Neighbors testified about ongoing vagrancy, graffiti, and a stolen vehicle left on site. The board motion (by Fred Andes) ordered demolition within 30 days, utility disconnect, property vacated and secured, and priority placement on the demolition list. The motion passed unanimously. 1847 Macaulay Avenue (District 4) - Code officer Stephanie Sánchez presented a demolition recommendation. The property, owned by Morales Richard D. (not present), had multiple cleanups (last on August 4, 2026 costing $2,000; total about $3,000 with admin). Extensive damage to roof, walls, and an outbuilding; structure was deemed hazardous and infested with vagrants. Potential buyer Josh Martinez spoke, claiming ongoing purchase negotiations and presenting a verbal plan to repair the main structure and demolish the detached garage. Francisco Lopez provided a letter of intent. The board decided to reset the case to the next available meeting date to allow Martinez time to secure title, provide a detailed work scope, financial proof, and timeline. The motion to reset passed 7-0 with guidance from staff. 5475 Jose Lane (District 6) - Code officer Jaime Jaso presented a first-time demolition recommendation. The property, owned by Genoveva Jiménez (not present), showed structural leaning, roof damage, interior rotting, vagrant activity, and two accessory structures in severe disrepair. No public testimony. The board motion (by Robert Banke) ordered demolition within 30 days, with eviction, securing, and cleanup. An additional amendment (by legal counsel) to evict and secure was accepted. The motion passed unanimously. Key Outcomes - 203 Goodleaf Street: Order to evict within 30 days, secure property, suspend utilities, pay $198 cleanup cost. (Vote: 7-0) - 403 Cliff Avenue: Order to demolish within 30 days, evict, disconnect utilities, clean site. (Vote: 7-0) - 1139 West Mulberry Avenue: Order to repair within 30 days with permits, property to remain vacant until completion. (Vote: 7-0) - 1404 North Olive Street: Order to demolish within 30 days, secure, disconnect utilities, prioritize demolition. (Vote: unanimous) - 1847 Macaulay Avenue: Case reset to next available meeting date for potential buyer to submit required documentation (title, work scope, financial proof, timeline). (Vote: 7-0) - 5475 Jose Lane: Order to demolish structures within 30 days, evict, secure, clean site. (Vote: unanimous) - The board recessed for a brief executive session (10:15-10:21) with legal counsel; no action taken. - Meeting adjourned after administrative items.
The City of San Antonio held a special session at 12:05 p.m. on Thursday, September 3, 2026, called to order by Mayor Jones. The sole purpose was to amend the board composition of the Midtown Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) Number 31, with two related ordinances: increasing the board size to 11 and appointing the District 2 council member as an ex officio member. Public Comments & Testimony - Seema Kyram (member of the Midtown TIRZ Advisory Board, River Road resident): Spoke in support of both agenda items. She noted that the Midtown TIRZ (which includes the Pearl and surrounding developments) is one of San Antonio's greatest TIRZ success stories, but that investment is now driving gentrification and displacement. She emphasized the need for board alignment with city values to prioritize public dollars for neighbors in need over developers. She highlighted that the body is considering extending the TIRZ to 2060, which she stated could divert an additional $500 million from the general fund over the next 40 years. She argued that appointing Councilman McKee Rodriguez would provide additional accountability and alignment. Discussion Items - Item 1: Ordinance to increase the composition of the Midtown TIRZ board to 11 members. - Mayor Jones noted that the change allows the impacted District 2 council member to participate in a formal capacity, given upcoming major decisions. No staff presentation was requested. The motion was moved and seconded; no further council discussion occurred. - Item 2: Ordinance appointing the District 2 council member (Councilman McKee Rodriguez) as an ex officio member of the Midtown TIRZ board. - The motion was moved and seconded; no council discussion occurred beyond a brief joke exchange. Key Outcomes - Item 1 passed (motion carried) – The board size was increased to 11 members, enabling inclusion of the District 2 council member. - Item 2 passed (motion carried) – Councilman McKee Rodriguez was appointed as an ex officio member of the Midtown TIRZ board. - Both votes were unanimous (no opposition noted). The meeting adjourned at 12:10 p.m.
Mayor Jones called a special session on September 3, 2026, to consider changes to the governing board of Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) 31 Midtown. The meeting was brief, with two agenda items: expanding the board from 2 to 11 members and appointing the District 2 council member as an ex-officio member. A single member of the public testified in support of both items. No discussion occurred among council members. Roll call was taken, quorum was established, and both items were approved by voice vote. Public Comments & Testimony - Mia Caram, a member of the TIRZ Advisory Board and a resident of an area impacted by the TIRZ, spoke in favor of both items. She argued that the board expansion and inclusion of an elected official would better align the board with community needs. She noted that extending the TIRZ to 2060 would include $500,000 more in general fund revenue over 40 years and stressed the importance of prioritizing investments for residents facing displacement, not just developers. Discussion Items - Item 1 – Ordinance to Increase TIRZ 31 Midtown Board Membership from 2 to 11: The ordinance proposed expanding the board of the Midtown TIRZ to improve representation. A motion to approve was made, seconded, and passed without discussion. - Item 2 – Ordinance to Appoint the District 2 Council Member as an Ex Officio Board Member: This ordinance appointed Council Member Mequis Rodríguez (District 2) to the TIRZ board. A motion to approve was made, seconded, and passed without discussion. Key Outcomes - Both ordinances were approved unanimously (no dissenting votes recorded). The board of TIRZ 31 Midtown will be expanded to 11 members, and Council Member Mequis Rodríguez will serve as an ex-officio member.
The meeting convened at 1:06 p.m. on Wednesday, September 2, 2026, and adjourned at 4:26 p.m. City staff presented the debt management plan, the proposed 2027 bond program update, capital delivery performance, and the public works budget. Council members discussed options for bond size, tax rate flexibility, infrastructure needs, and equity. Discussion Items - Debt Management Plan (Troy Elliott, CFO): - The city has maintained a fixed debt service tax rate of 21 cents per $100 of assessed value since 2004. This rate generates about 38% of the property tax rate. - For the 2027 bond program, a continued fixed 21 cent rate would provide $450 million in bonding capacity under current forecasts (negative 2.7% growth in 2027, flat in 2028, then gradual recovery). - Two alternative scenarios were presented using a flexible debt service rate: - $1.2 billion bond: Would require an average annual taxable value growth of 4.5% to maintain the 21 cent rate. If growth is slower, the rate could rise to approximately 24 cents, adding about $5.49 per month to the average homestead. - $1 billion bond: Would require 3.75% average growth; the rate could rise to 23 cents, adding about $3.57 per month. - Sensitivity analysis: Every 1% increase in taxable values above projections generates $165 million in additional capacity; every 1 cent increase in the debt service rate generates $300 million in capacity and costs $1.93 per month on the average homestead. - The city's outstanding debt of $2.7 billion in GO/CO/tax notes carries an effective interest rate of 3.11% with an average life of 7.9 years. Total outstanding debt including revenue bonds is $4.4 billion. - Staff noted that current debt ratings are prime (AAA/AA+) and that a flexible rate approach is not expected to negatively impact ratings. - Capital Delivery Department (Mike Shannon): - Created one year ago from Public Works to focus on project delivery. 188 staff members manage 153 active projects. - FY26 performance: 82 projects completed or projected to complete by end of September 2026. 2022 bond program progress moved from 49% to 78% of projects complete or under construction; target 87% by end of 2026 and 96% by end of FY27. - Improvements include: restructuring into vertical and horizontal divisions, cradle-to-grave project management, improved utility coordination (MOU with SAWS, negotiating similar with CPS), subsurface utility engineering, contractor incentives and responsible bidder scorecards. - Capital budget: $317 million ($32M personnel, $285M capital). Proposed 2027 bond timeline: call election February 4, 2027; public vote May 2027. - Highlighted projects: new police station in District 3, pickleball courts at Northeast Senior Center, Marbach drainage project, downtown complete street projects. - Public Works (Art Reinhardt): - Vision to be the premier public works organization. Budget of $326.5 million (12M increase from prior year, mostly for capital). 701 positions. - Street maintenance: $130 million for 534 miles (12% of network). Pavement condition indexing updated with six soil-specific degradation curves, showing citywide PCI decline of about 1.9 points. All districts to remain above PCI 70 under new projections. - Sidewalk program: $12.8 million for 22 miles (50% gap filling, 40% repairs, 10% trip hazard removal). Sidewalk condition assessment completed: 72% in excellent/fair condition; 1,500 miles of gaps identified (estimated $900M need). - Traffic safety: New tactical projects approach using $1 million annual traffic calming program to implement quicker, lower-cost improvements. Updated traffic calming handbook, online application in development. - Other programs: vegetation management ($6M), street sweeping (45,000 gutter miles), 12 new traffic signals, school pedestrian safety ($1M for markings and flasher upgrades). - Proposed reductions: two vacant positions (senior electronic technician and equipment operator) and elimination of $500,000 for radar feedback signs and flashing stop signs. Fee increases for right-of-way permits (15% plus application increases). - New: $400,000 for prima facie speed limit study (CCR from District 7), $300,000 for automated traffic signal performance software (recurring cost) Key Outcomes - No votes taken. The work session was informational for the FY2027 budget and the 2027 bond program. - Direction to staff to provide follow-up information by September 30 B-session: - Analysis of the impact of proposed TIF (TIRZ) extensions on the debt management plan. - A three-year bond option alternative. - Breakdown of project delivery times by district and by type (traffic signals, sidewalks, streets, etc.). - Comparison of peer Texas cities' bond ratings and variable versus fixed debt service tax rates. - Information on how property value growth relates to infrastructure investment. - Council members expressed a range of positions: - Several members (Castillo, Mungia, Rodriguez, Galvan) supported scenario two or three (larger bond with variable rate) to address deferred infrastructure needs in underserved districts. - Councilmember White opposed variable rate, stating the city should maintain fiscal discipline and not raise taxes. - Councilmember Spears concerned about cumulative tax burden from multiple entities (city, SAWS, county, schools) and requested a comprehensive view of all tax and fee impacts under different scenarios. - Councilmember Alcorta-Gavito was not supportive of increasing the debt service tax rate at this time due to economic pressures on families. - Mayor Jones requested a review of TIF extensions' effect on debt capacity and noted the uncertainty of state actions affecting CPS Energy could influence bond timing (potentially a November 2027 election instead of May). - City Manager is to provide an updated amendment list by end of the week and a memo on emergency housing rehabilitation. - Next bond program discussion scheduled for September 30, 2026. - The meeting adjourned at 4:26 p.m.