Public Meetings - San Antonio, Texas

The San Antonio City Council met on Thursday, October 2, 2025, at 9:04 a.m. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Gina Ortiz Jones, with a quorum present. The agenda included proclamations for Indigenous Peoples Day, Manufacturing Month (October 2025), and Domestic Violence Awareness Month, followed by the consent agenda, two items pulled for individual consideration, a city manager's report, and an executive session. The council recessed into executive session at 10:07 a.m. and reconvened at 10:34 a.m., adjourning without further action. Proclamations - Indigenous Peoples Day – Mayor Jones proclaimed October 12, 2025, as Indigenous Peoples Day in San Antonio. Antonio Diaz of the Texas Indigenous Council spoke, noting a seven-direction ceremonial prayer. - Manufacturing Month – The mayor proclaimed October 2025 as Manufacturing Month, recognizing the Texas Federation for Advanced Manufacturing Education (Texas FAM) Alamo Chapter. Carla Wright (VP of Manufacturing, Toyota Texas) highlighted the $2.9 trillion contribution of manufacturing to the U.S. economy in Q1 2025 and the skills gap. Multiple council members expressed support for the industry's role in providing quality jobs and upward mobility. - Domestic Violence Awareness Month – The mayor proclaimed October as National Domestic Violence Awareness and Prevention Month, citing that one in three women and one in four men experience intimate partner violence. Maria Viego Mess (co-chair, Bexar County Collaborative on Domestic Violence) reported seven calls per hour to 911 related to domestic violence. Dr. Jacob (Metro Health) encouraged participation in the Purple Porch campaign. Council members shared personal experiences and pledged ongoing work on healthy relationships. Consent Calendar - Items 4 through 30 were approved as a group, except for items 22 and 28 which were pulled for individual consideration. Councilmembers highlighted several appointments: District 5 appointments (items 15–17), Roger Andrade to Stormwater Management Advisory Board (item 18), Dr. Gwendolyn Godlock to Mayor's Commission on the Status of Women (item 19), Anita Joe Medina to Streets, Bridges, and Sidewalks Advisory Board (item 20), Yvonne Addison to Building Standards Board (item 21), and Joanne Tobias Molina to Elderly Affairs Commission (item 13). The motion passed by voice vote. Public Comments & Testimony - Andrew Janoski (Vice President, Highland Hills Neighborhood Association) – Opposed reducing Goliad Road from four lanes to three lanes due to heavy traffic congestion; urged maintaining four lanes. - Dr. George Hinajosa (President, Highland Hills Neighborhood Association) – Supported the revitalization plan overall but opposed lane reduction; expressed appreciation for the amendment addressing the concern. - Anna Alicia Romero (Director of Legislative and External Affairs, San Antonio ISD) – Speaking for Superintendent Dr. Jaime Aquino, she supported maintaining the current four-lane configuration (Alternative 2) to ensure student safety, noting that adding bike lanes would worsen congestion near Kate Schenk Elementary. Discussion Items - Item 22: Bexar Appraisal District Board Nomination – Originally nominated Councilmember Terrific Castillo. A motion to postpone to October 9 failed on a roll call vote (ayes: Councilmembers Core, Mickey Rodriguez, Via Gran, Meso Gonzalez, Mayor Jones; nays: Councilmembers Mungia, Castillo, Galvan, Alderete Gavito, Spears, White). Councilmember Castillo then moved to amend by replacing her nomination with Councilmember Ivanis Mesa Gonzalez. After brief debate (Councilmember White supported; Mayor Jones opposed citing a prior suspension), the amendment passed. The main motion as amended then passed, appointing Councilmember Mesa Gonzalez for a term from January 1, 2026, to December 31, 2029. - Item 28: Goliad Road Revitalization Plan – Ordinance adopting the plan for an area near Goliad Road. Councilmember Via Gran moved to amend the plan by removing the designation of a preferred street design and renaming design options (e.g., “preferred street design” becomes “Option 3,” etc.). After public comments, the amendment passed. The main motion as amended then passed. Key Outcomes - Consent agenda (items 4–30, minus 22 and 28) approved. - Item 22: Councilmember Ivanis Mesa Gonzalez appointed to the Bexar Appraisal District Board of Directors (term Jan 1, 2026 – Dec 31, 2029). - Item 28: Goliad Road Revitalization Plan adopted with amendment removing preferred street design and renaming options; the plan maintains existing lane configuration per public input. - No report from City Manager Eric. - Executive session held on economic development, real property, and legal matters; no action taken. - Meeting adjourned at 10:34 a.m.

The San Antonio City Council held a zoning session on October 2, 2025, to consider several zoning and plan amendment requests. The meeting began with postponements of multiple items to later dates. The main agenda item was a request to rezone a 69-acre property for a funeral home and cemetery in District 3, which drew significant public opposition. The council also approved zoning changes for two other properties. Consent Calendar - Items 2, 3, 5 were postponed to October 16, 2025. - Item 11 was postponed to November 6, 2025. - The consent agenda initially included items 13, 14, 15, and 16. After item 6 was pulled for individual consideration, the remaining consent items (13, 14, 15, 16) were approved en bloc. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 6 (Cemetery/Funeral Home): Multiple residents from the Mission del Lago community and surrounding areas spoke in opposition, citing: loss of tax revenue (cemeteries are tax-exempt), oversaturation of cemeteries in Bexar County and District 3 (21 existing cemeteries within three miles), environmental concerns (chemicals, drainage, odors), traffic congestion on FM 281, negative impact on property values, and the applicant's history of legal settlements and fines. Speakers also argued the land could be used for affordable housing or commercial development. Petitions showed 467 opposed vs. 4 in favor among property owners outside 200 feet. The Southside Independent School District requested denial. - Item 6 (Applicant): James McKnight, Jane McMahon, Darren Summer, and Brady Alexander (representing SCI) spoke in favor. They emphasized community benefits: a 5-acre donation for a library or community center, $100,000 in scholarships, internship opportunities, and a park-like design. They argued the cemetery is needed due to population growth (over 800 new homes in the area) and that tax exemption is a state policy, not a zoning issue. - Items 15-16 (Raymond Street): Lucy Orozco and Conrad Jarvis spoke in favor of the rezoning to allow a single-family home on their property, stating they purchased the lot with that intention. Discussion Items - Item 6 – Zoning Change for Funeral Home and Cemetery (13,279 FM 1937): The council debated the scope of considerations in zoning decisions. Council Members Villagrán and Maki Rodríguez argued that factors beyond land use (corporate practices, environmental risks) could be considered, while Council Members White and Corr urged focus on land use criteria. The applicant stated compliance with all regulations. Council Member Villagrán, representing District 3, made a motion to approve, noting the property's location between a highway and a railroad, making it unsuitable for residential development, and the community benefits offered. The motion passed by voice vote. - Items 13-14 – Plan Amendment and Zoning Change (1301 Fest Street): Staff recommended approval for a change from mixed-use to medium-density residential allowing four units. Council Member Castillo made a motion to approve with amendments to add parking and buffers. Approved by voice vote. - Items 15-16 – Plan Amendment and Zoning Change (1.17 Raymond Street): Staff recommended approval for a change from low-density residential to mixed-use low-density. Council Member Castillo moved to approve, noting the property will be used for a single-family home, not short-term rental, and is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Approved by voice vote. Key Outcomes - Items 2, 3, and 5 postponed to October 16, 2025. - Item 11 postponed to November 6, 2025. - Item 6 (Cemetery): Approved. The council approved the rezoning of approximately 69 acres (amended from 73.35) for a funeral home and cemetery, with conditions including the 5-acre community space donation and scholarship fund. - Items 13-14 (Fest Street): Approved as amended (additional parking and buffers). - Items 15-16 (Raymond Street): Approved. - All votes were voice votes and passed without recorded dissents.

The City of San Antonio held a B session on Wednesday, October 1, 2025, at 2:02 p.m. The meeting focused on two major agenda items: a comprehensive briefing from the San Antonio Water System (SAWS) on water loss, infrastructure needs, and budget planning; and an update on the Riverwalk Capital Improvements Strategic Plan. Council members engaged in extensive discussion on both topics, emphasizing equity, affordability, conservation, and coordination. Consent Calendar No consent calendar items were presented. Public Comments & Testimony No public testimony was heard during this session. The meeting was dedicated to briefings and council discussion. Discussion Items SAWS Briefing: Water Loss, Infrastructure, and Budget Robert Puente (SAWS President/CEO), Doug Evanson (CFO), and Andrea Beamer (COO) presented a detailed overview of SAWS operations. Key points included: - Non-Revenue Water (Water Loss): In 2023, water loss peaked due to drought and staffing challenges. SAWS established the Office of Non-Revenue Water and has increased leak detection staffing from 6 to 16. Response time for non-emergency repairs dropped from 14 days (2022-2023) to 2 days (2025). Goals: reduce water loss to 61 gallons per connection per day by 2028, and an aspirational target of 43 gallons by 2035 (50% reduction from 2023 peak). - Infrastructure Age: 23% of water mains are 50+ years old; 62% are 10-50 years old. SAWS plans to spend over $500 million on water main replacement over the next five years. An AI failure prediction model is used to prioritize replacements. - AMI Meters: 91% of customer meters have been replaced with electronic smart meters (AMI), improving leak detection and billing accuracy. Full installation expected by end of 2025. - Capital Needs: SAWS projects $3.2 billion in capital improvements for 2026-2030, primarily for wastewater treatment plant rehabilitation ($1.7 billion) and water delivery ($1.2 billion). Two largest water recycling centers (Stephen M. Claus and Leon Creek) require over $340 million in upgrades. - Rate Adjustment: No rate increase has been implemented since 2020. Due to inflation, deferred capital projects, and declining credit metrics, SAWS is planning to request a rate adjustment in early 2026. For 2026, an interim budget without a rate increase is proposed, deferring $350 million in CIP to maintain credit ratings. - Rate Comparisons: SAWS residential rates for 6,000 gallons of water and sewer are the lowest among the 10 largest Texas cities. Current combined bill is $63.27/month, down 9% from 2020. Other cities have increased by 26% on average. - Data Centers: SAWS has sufficient water supply for potential data centers, but these are not a primary economic development target due to high water and energy use. No specific capital planning for data center demand. Council members raised concerns about equity, affordability, and the impact of rate increases on low-income families. Several asked for data on program usage and eligibility criteria for the Uplift assistance program (home value cap of $300,000). Others requested mapping of aging infrastructure and pressure zones. The mayor noted that a tabletop exercise on federal budget cuts could inform future decisions, including a potential increase in the city's utility contribution from 4% to 5%. Riverwalk Capital Improvements Strategic Plan Update Shannon Miller (Director of Office of Historic Preservation) presented the scope for a new Riverwalk strategic plan, the first since 2008. The Riverwalk Capital Improvements Advisory Board (composed of business owners, residents, and lessees) oversees a special fund derived from patio leases. The 2008 plan resulted in $18.7 million in improvements (six phases), including ADA ramps and elevators. - RFP Scope: The new strategic plan will take a holistic approach, covering capital improvements, business growth, traffic/circulation, public art, ecology, and code updates (e.g., signage, noise). Public input campaign is a major component. - Timeline: RFP closes October 9, 2025; selection by November; plan completion by end of fiscal year 2026. - Funding: Approximately $800,000/year from lease revenue funds the studies. Additional sources may include hotel tax. - Task Five (optional) — extending the plan to areas beyond the traditional horseshoe—will be made mandatory per mayor's request. - Council Input: Members emphasized the need for ADA accessibility, worker safety, shade/misters, improved wayfinding, sustainability, and balancing commercial interests with resident experience. Councilwoman McKee Rodriguez raised concerns about disproportionate downtown investment compared to other districts. Key Outcomes - No formal votes were taken during this briefing session. - Directives: - SAWS will provide additional data: water loss figures by district, aging infrastructure maps, and breakdown of affordability program usage. - SAWS will consider a third-party operational audit (requested by Councilman White). - The Riverwalk RFP will be adjusted: Task Five (extended area) will be mandatory; scope will include public input from employees, residents, and disability advocates; focus on safety, accessibility, sustainability, and emissions reduction. - City staff to provide a follow-up memo on the history of Riverwalk fund revenue and investments since 2008. - Next Steps: - SAWS interim budget will be presented to its board in November, with a rate adjustment request expected in early 2026. - Riverwalk plan consultant selection in November; comprehensive public input campaign to begin shortly after. - The meeting concluded at 5:37 p.m. with a note that the council would enter executive session to discuss litigation (TDS v. City) in which the city received a favorable jury verdict.

The San Antonio City Council met on October 1, 2025, at 2:02 PM. The meeting featured two major presentations: a comprehensive update from the San Antonio Water System (SAWS) on water loss, infrastructure, and the proposed 2026 budget, and a presentation on the new River Walk strategic plan. Council members engaged in extensive discussion on both topics, raising concerns about equity, affordability, aging infrastructure, data center water use, and accessibility. No formal votes were taken, but several directives for future action were given. SAWS Presentation – Water System Overview and 2026 Budget - Water Loss and Infrastructure: SAWS officials (Andrea Beamer, Chief Administrative Officer; David Kevin, CFO) presented data showing that SAWS is one of the largest water systems in the country (934 sq mi, 797 mi of water mains, 13 water sources). They reported a significant water loss challenge, with a goal of reducing gallons lost per connection per day from 61 to 43. The system includes 59 pressure zones. SAWS plans to invest $500 million over five years to replace water mains. They have installed 106 new flow meters (to be completed by end of 2026) and are replacing 605,000 meters (91% complete, expected by end of 2025). The 2026-2030 capital improvement plan is $3.1 billion, with $608 million in additional projects. SAWS requested a temporary deferral of $350 million in capital improvements to allow for a rate study, with no rate increase expected until at least 2026. - Rates and Affordability: SAWS reported that San Antonio has the lowest combined water and sewer rates among the ten largest Texas cities. For 6,000 gallons, the average bill is $69.63, a 9% reduction from 2020. They highlighted the Uplift program (14 assistance programs) for low-income customers, including free first 2,000 gallons for qualified households. Council members urged expanding eligibility and communication about these programs. - Data Centers and Growth: Council members expressed concern about water demand from data centers. SAWS stated that data centers must pay for all needed infrastructure and that the utility has sufficient water supply for projected growth, though they have no incentive programs for such users. Council members requested a timeline for the water recycling expansion and more information on pressure zones and infrastructure age. - Operational Audit: Council member White requested an independent operational audit of SAWS, similar to one done for CPS Energy. The request was acknowledged, but no commitment was made. - Council Requests: Several council members requested district-level data on infrastructure age, water loss, assistance program usage, and pressure zones. They also asked for improved communication on construction projects and better coordination with Public Works. River Walk Strategic Plan Update - Presentation: Shannon Miller, Director of the Office of Historic Preservation, presented a plan to update the 2008 River Walk Master Plan. The new strategic plan will cover the main channel from Houston Street to Nueva Street, focusing on accessibility, safety, business attraction, public art, shade, and signage. Funding comes from the River Walk Fund (rents from concessionaires). The RFP closes on October 9, 2025, with a consultant selected in November. The plan will include public outreach to both tourists and residents, particularly those who rarely visit the River Walk. - Council Discussion: Council members emphasized the need for ADA accessibility, shade structures, better wayfinding (digital maps), and improved lighting. They requested that the plan include sustainability goals (water conservation, energy efficiency) and that the scope be expanded to consider the entire River Walk extension (not just the main channel). Concerns were raised about the exclusion of Task 5 (plan for extended reaches) due to funding. Several members called for a balance between tourism and local resident needs, and for more representation of all council districts in the planning process. The RFP preferences for local and veteran-owned businesses were discussed, with a suggestion to increase local preference from 5 to 10 points. Key Outcomes - Directives to SAWS: Provide district-level data on infrastructure age, pressure zones, and assistance program usage. Improve construction communication with residents. Report back on the feasibility of expanding the Uplift program eligibility. Continue efforts to reduce water loss and consider an independent operational audit. - Directives for River Walk Plan: Incorporate ADA accessibility, shade, digital wayfinding, and sustainability goals into the RFP. Ensure public outreach includes all areas of the city. Explore funding for Task 5 (extended reaches of the River Walk). The council will receive updates as the strategic plan progresses. - Litigation Note: At the close of the meeting, the city noted a major legal victory: the solid waste department won a case where TDS had sought $20 million in damages, receiving nothing. Timing and Adjournment The meeting concluded at 5:37 PM.

The Historic and Design Review Commission (HDRC) met on October 1, 2025, at 2:00 PM (presumed) under Acting Chair Jeffrey Fetzer. The commission considered multiple applications for certificates of appropriateness, including street name changes, digital media art displays, a park playscape, and residential additions. Key discussions centered on historic preservation, tree protection, riverwalk visibility, and design integration. Votes were recorded on each item, with several split decisions. Consent Calendar - Approved the meeting minutes from September 17, 2025 (unanimous). - Approved consent agenda items 3, 4, 5, and 6 as a block (items 1,2,8,9,10,11 were pulled; item 7 postponed). Public Comments & Testimony - Kathleen Trentard (general public comment): Opposed digital billboards in historic downtown, citing negative feedback from 75% of survey respondents and potential grandfathering. - Brackenridge Park playscape (Item 2) — Several speakers: - Alicia Garlock: Opposed the splash pad, citing high maintenance costs ($30,000+ per year), safety concerns (Naegleria fowleri), and neglect of existing historic features. - Ellen Patterson (attorney): Opposed the playscape, warning of heritage tree root damage, loss of shade, and displacement of waterfowl; advocated for tree preservation and cheaper alternatives. - Carol Patterson: Opposed due to disruption of migratory bird flyways (central flyway used by 400 species, including whooping cranes). - Ida Ayala (District 2 resident): Expressed conditional support but criticized lack of public input before contracting; demanded no cutting of large heritage trees. Discussion Items - Item 1: Street Name Change – 123 Fur, 107 Magnolia, etc. (Matagorda Street to Southtown Aldea). Applicant Omar Gonzalez proposed renaming a closed segment. Commissioners debated retaining historic continuity vs. wayfinding clarity. Initial motion failed 4‑4. Second motion to approve with stipulation to commemorate historic name passed 5‑3. - Item 2: Brackenridge Park Nature Playscape & Splash Pad (2‑acre site). Applicant Chris Matri (Conservancy) described relocation of 20 trees, addition of 94 new trees, and a water feature. Commissioners questioned tree protection (tier 1 & 2), bridge access, maintenance, and community engagement (3 meetings + online survey). Public speakers voiced strong opposition. Motion to approve with staff stipulations passed on a split vote (reported as carried). - Item 8: Digital Display – 106 South St. Mary's (southwest corner). Sign reduced to 300 sq ft, 25 ft tall, flush mounted. Applicant incorporated DRC feedback (vertical orientation, concealment of brackets). Motion for conceptual approval carried 8‑1 (Commissioner Savino dissenting). - Item 9: Digital Displays – 451 Soledad (north and south faces). Applicant Blake Custer presented two signs: one integrated into parking garage columns (south face), another rectangular on north face. Commission debated riverwalk visibility and design consistency. Motion to approve south face as presented and conceptually approve north face with stipulation (not visible from riverwalk) passed on split vote (Commissioners Savino and Cervantes dissenting on part). - Item 10: Digital Displays – 421 West Market (east and west faces). Applicant Jason Prophet (Outfront Media) detailed two signs; the east-facing sign aligned with building lines, west-facing sign required further work. Motion to approve east sign as presented and send west sign to DRC carried 7‑2 (Commissioners Savino and Cervantes dissenting). - Item 11: Digital Displays – 412 East Commerce (northeast and southwest corners). Staff recommended denial of northeast sign (visible from riverwalk). Commission agreed. Southwest sign was redesigned to fit between columns with reduced protrusion. Motion to deny northeast sign and approve southwest sign passed 7‑2 (Commissioners Savino and Velasquez dissenting on both). - Item 13: Residential Addition – 850 East Magnolia Avenue (River Road Historic District). Applicant sought side addition, screened porch, and carport. Neighborhood committee supported the plan due to floodplain constraints and tree preservation. Motion to approve with stipulations (including vine screening on carport) carried unanimously. - Item 14: Commercial Conversion – 901 North Alamo Street (proposed bar “Yaya’s House”). Applicant requested window modifications, vinyl windows, fiber cement siding, and chain‑link fence. Staff recommended wood or aluminum‑clad windows and historic opening sizes. Applicant cited cost and durability concerns. Motion to approve all items with staff stipulations carried 8‑1 (Commissioner Velasquez dissenting on window material). Key Outcomes - Item 1 – Approved with stipulation to honor historic name (5‑3). Certificate of appropriateness to be emailed within 10 days. - Item 2 – Approved with staff stipulations (split vote). Conservancy to add 94 trees, ensure tree protection, and return if bridge location changes. - Item 8 – Conceptual approval granted (8‑1). Applicant must return with detailed architectural drawings. - Item 9 – South sign approved; north sign conceptually approved with riverwalk visibility stipulation (split vote). Applicant encouraged to seek DRC for north sign. - Item 10 – East sign approved as presented; west sign sent back to DRC for further design development. - Item 11 – Northeast sign denied; southwest sign approved (7‑2). No appeal noted. - Item 13 – Approved unanimously with stipulations (standing seam metal roof, vine screening on carport). - Item 14 – Approved with staff stipulations (8‑1); applicant to consult with staff on code compliance for modified openings. Note: Item numbers follow the agenda order from the HDRC packet. All decisions are advisory to the City Manager and city departments. Work cannot commence until appropriate city permits and certificates of appropriateness are issued.

The San Antonio Historic Review and Design Commission (HRDC) met on Wednesday, October 1, 2025, to consider several certificates of appropriateness for projects in historic districts, including signage, a playground, and property modifications. The meeting began with the nomination of Commissioner Sabino as vice president and approval of the September 17, 2025 minutes. Consent Calendar - The consent calendar (items 3, 4, 5, and 6) was approved unanimously, with Commissioner Sabino pulling items 1, 2, 8, 9, 10, and 11 for separate discussion. Public Comments & Testimony - Catherine Charchard spoke in opposition to digital signage in the downtown historic district, stating that 75% of survey respondents provided negative feedback and that such signs diminish property values and the character of the city. She urged property owners to sacrifice their facades for the public good. - Alicia Garlock (representing Brackenridge Park Conservancy) expressed concerns about the proposed playground project, citing lack of maintenance, tree removal, and the cost ($36,000 per year) and health risks of water play features. She opposed the project as currently designed. - Ellen Patterson, an attorney and long-time park user, opposed the Breckenridge Park project, citing harm to heritage trees (root cutting, weakening), loss of bird habitat, and the need for an arborist. She also suggested using funds for sidewalk cleaning instead of fireworks. - Carl Patterson opposed the project, emphasizing the importance of the park as a migratory bird habitat along the Central Flyway and noting that the park has lost habitat due to widening of Highway 410. - Ada Ayala (District 2 resident) stated she supports the concept of a playground but criticized the community engagement process, saying promises were made to preserve large heritage trees but that tree removal has already begun. She asked the commission to hold the developer to their promises. Discussion Items - Agenda Item 1 – Street Name Change (Matagorda to Aldea): Oxford Development proposed renaming a short segment of Matagorda Street (from César Chávez to La Vaca) to Aldea. Commissioner Velázquez argued for preserving the Matagorda name for historical continuity. A motion to approve with a stipulation to honor the Matagorda name through design elements failed (4-5). A second motion to approve with the stipulation that the continuation of Matagorda be honored in the design passed (6-3). - Agenda Item 2 – Breckenridge Park Playground: The applicant (Chris Matre, executive director of Brackenridge Park Playground) presented a proposal for a two-acre natural playground with water features, 42 new trees, and relocation of 20 existing trees. Concerns were raised about tree protection, water safety, and community engagement. The commission heard public opposition and asked about arborist plans and maintenance. A motion to approve with staff stipulations passed (6-3). - Agenda Item 8 – Sign at West Market & South Flores (Fairman): The applicant reduced the proposed sign from 800 sq ft to 340 sq ft after HDRC feedback. The sign would be 25 ft high and 12 ft wide, mounted on the southwest corner of the building. Commissioners requested design details on the profile and attachment. The commission granted conceptual approval (9-0). - Agenda Item 9 – Sign at 451 Soledad (Custer): Two signs proposed – Sign A (south elevation) and Sign B (north elevation). Sign A was praised for integration with the building; Sign B was criticized as not fitting the architectural rhythm. The motion approved Sign A and granted conceptual approval for Sign B, requiring further design development and a return to HDRC (7-2). - Agenda Item 10 – Two Signs at 421 West Market (Profit/Outfront): Sign A (facing Commerce) was considered appropriate; Sign B (facing Market) was debated for being too large and intrusive. The motion approved Sign A and referred Sign B back to the DRC for further refinement (7-2). - Agenda Item 12 – Signs at 42 E Commerce: The northeast sign was deemed visible from the Riverwalk, contrary to ordinance. The southeast sign was improved but still raised concerns. A motion to deny the northeast sign and approve the southeast sign with architectural details passed (7-2). - Agenda Item 13 – 105 Magnolia (Sigue): Proposed addition of a bedroom, porch, and garage. The neighborhood association supported staff recommendations to remove the porch and place the garage to the east. The applicant agreed to landscaping to screen the garage. Motion to approve with stipulations passed unanimously. - Agenda Item 14 – 901 N Alam (Hernandez): Applicant sought to modify window openings and replace windows and siding. Staff recommended approval of siding but required window openings to match historic patterns. After discussion about code compliance and cost, motion to approve all points with staff stipulations passed unanimously. Key Outcomes - Vice President Nomination: Commissioner Sabino was elected vice president. - Minutes: Approved unanimously. - Votes: - Agenda 1 (street name): Motion 1 failed 4-5; Motion 2 passed 6-3. - Agenda 2 (Breckenridge Park): Passed 6-3. - Agenda 8 (West Market sign): Conceptual approval passed 9-0. - Agenda 9 (451 Soledad): Sign A approved, Sign B conceptual – passed 7-2. - Agenda 10 (421 West Market): Sign A approved, Sign B to DRC – passed 7-2. - Agenda 12 (42 E Commerce): Northeast sign denied, southeast approved – passed 7-2. - Agenda 13 (105 Magnolia): Approved unanimously. - Agenda 14 (901 N Alam): Approved unanimously. - Directives: Applicants for conceptual approvals (items 8, 9) were directed to return to the HDRC with final design details. The Breckenridge Park project must comply with staff stipulations on tree protection and maintenance.

The San Antonio Board of Adjustment convened on September 30, 2025, at 1:06 PM to hear eleven cases involving requests for variances and special exceptions. The board deliberated on lot dimensions, building height, setbacks, landscape buffers, impermeable cover, and fence heights. Quorum was established with nine members, eventually reaching eleven commissioners for final votes. Postponements Case BOA-25103106 (3805 Southwest Military): A mobile food court variance requested by Vanira Córdoba was postponed to October 6, 2025. Staff had recommended denial. Case BOA-251030176 (703 West Rosewood Avenue): A variance for auxiliary structures and setbacks requested by Alfredo Enrique de la Riva was postponed to October 20, 2025, to allow the applicant to meet with the neighborhood association. Case BOA-251030175 (8338 Broadway Street): A setback variance requested by KFM Engineering Design was postponed to October 20, 2025. Approved Cases Case BOA-251030165 (116 Roseline, District 3): Approved unanimously (10-0). Variances for minimum lot size (4,809 sq ft vs. required 6,000 sq ft) and lot width (41 ft vs. required 50 ft) were granted for a single-family home. Staff recommended approval. Case BOA-251030168 (118 Parkway Drive, District 3): Approved unanimously (10-0). Variances for lot size (4,750 sq ft vs. required 5,000 sq ft) and lot width (38 ft vs. required 45 ft) were granted for a single-family home in a historic district. The neighborhood association expressed support, though one voicemail in opposition was received. Case BOA-251030170 (7802 Farley Park Drive, District 7): Approved unanimously (10-0). A special exception was granted for a privacy fence of 7 feet (posts at 7 ft 6 in) on the east side and rear of the property. Case BOA-251030171 (1323 West Avenue, District 7): Approved unanimously (11-0). A variance for a carport setback was granted to allow two vehicles to park. The applicant agreed to amend the plan to include gutters for drainage. Staff had recommended denial. Case BOA-251030177 (126 West Carolina Street, District 1): Approved unanimously (10-0). A one-inch variance from the minimum side and rear setbacks was granted for a 12-unit residential condominium building. Case BOA-251030152 (143, 145, 147 Forrest Avenue, District 5): Approved 11-0. A height variance was granted to permit three stories instead of the maximum 2.5 for three single-family homes. Staff had recommended denial. Applicant Anthony Almaraz argued he relied on city staff communications that assured him his plans complied before UDC amendments took effect. The board found the variance would not alter the essential character of the area, noting similar three-story structures nearby. Case BOA-251030167 (376 Hawthorne Street, District 5): Approved 9-2. A variance to eliminate the required 15-foot landscape buffer for a vehicle sales business was modified. The board approved a 4-foot buffer with a 6-foot privacy fence and retention of native trees. Commissioners Cruz and Mena voted in opposition. Case BOA-251030172 (409 Eleanor Avenue, District 2): Approved 9-2. A variance was granted to allow 60% impermeable ground cover (a 10% increase over the 50% maximum) for a driveway and parking pad. The applicant cited safety concerns after two shooting incidents. The neighborhood association opposed the original scope. Commissioners Cruz and Mena voted against. Case BOA-251030174 (1155 Arrowhead Trail, District 4): Approved unanimously (11-0). A variance was granted for a 1-inch front setback to construct a carport. The contractor agreed to set the posts back further from the sidewalk. Procedural Matters The board approved its meeting schedule for the calendar year 2026. The board approved the minutes from the previous meeting.

The San Antonio Board of Adjustment convened on September 30, 2025, at 1:06 PM with a quorum of nine commissioners (later rising to eleven). The meeting addressed multiple variance and special exemption requests, including three continuances, and concluded with approval of the 2026 meeting schedule and minutes from September 22, 2025. Key decisions included granting variances for residential developments, a carport, and a commercial landscape buffer reduction, often citing neighborhood character, safety, and unique property constraints. Continuances - Item 2 (3803 Southwest Military): Continued to October 6, 2025, per applicant request. No public comment. - Item 10 (8338 Broadway Street): Continued to October 20, 2025, per applicant request. No public comment. - Item 11 (703 West Rosewood Avenue): Continued to October 20, 2025, after hearing public comments. Cynthia Walker (Beacon Hill Neighborhood Association) requested continuance for neighborhood review; Robin Rogers (702 West Rosewood Ave) opposed, stating the construction violated code and would harm the neighborhood. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 11 (continuance): Two voicemails played. Ms. Walker requested continuance; Ms. Rogers strongly opposed, citing illegal construction started by prior owner and excessive density. - Item 1 (143-147 Forest Ave): No live public comment, but applicant Anthony Almaraz presented extensive email evidence alleging city staff miscommunication about the need for a permit before the 2023 UDC amendment. - Item 5 (118 Park View Dr): A voicemail from a neighbor expressed opposition, claiming the variance would negatively affect surrounding properties and lot boundaries. - Item 8 (409 Eleanor Ave): Scott Day (vice president of Mahanky Park Neighborhood Association) spoke in opposition, citing NCD driveway standards, drainage, and inconsistent neighborhood character. - Other items: No live public comment; applicant presentations and staff reports constituted the testimony. Discussion Items - Item 1 – 143-147 Forest Avenue (Applicant: Anthony Almaraz): Request for a half-story variance to allow three 3-story single-family homes in IDZ1. Staff recommended denial due to height exceeding 2.5 stories. Applicant argued that prior to the 2023 UDC amendment, the design was compliant and that he was misled by city emails. Commissioners noted the small footprint, neighbor support (including adjacent property owner), and that denial could result in a more massive development. Motion to grant passed 11-0 with restrictions per plans submitted on September 30, 2025. - Item 3 – 116 Rose Lane (Applicant: Alexei Contreras for Jose Eduardo Flores Garrido): Variances for lot size (1,101 sq ft) and lot width (9 ft) to build a single-family home on a substandard lot in R6 zoning. Staff recommended approval, citing similar lots nearby and no opposition. Motion to grant passed 10-0. - Item 4 – 376 Hawthorne Street (Applicant: Jessica Ramirez for Yes Vic Investments): Request to eliminate 15-ft landscape buffers on three sides for a used car dealership (C1 zone). Staff recommended denial but offered an alternate: eliminate buffer along I-35 (west), reduce south buffer to 4 ft, and keep two large native trees and two understory trees on the east side. Applicant agreed. Councilmember District 5 opposed. Motion to grant per alternate passed 9-2 (Commissioners Cruz and Manna dissenting). - Item 5 – 118 Park View Drive (Applicant: Annalisa Alvarado): Lot size (250 sq ft) and lot width (7 ft) variances for a new two-story home in R5/Historic Mission District. Staff recommended approval; Roosevelt Park Neighborhood Association supported; one neighbor opposed via voicemail. Motion to grant passed 10-0. - Item 6 – 7802 Farland Park Drive (Applicant: Israel Garcia / Staria Black): Special exemption for a 7-ft 6-in privacy fence (1-ft 6-in variance) along east side and rear, adjacent to roadway and vacant lot. Staff recommended approval, citing privacy and security. Motion to grant (limited to 7-ft fence with 7-ft 6-in posts) passed 10-0. - Item 7 – 1323 West Theo Avenue (Applicant: Roberto Aguilar): Four-foot variance to allow carport to be 1 ft from side property line (minimum 5 ft). Staff recommended denial because applicant deviated from permitted plans. Applicant explained he acted on contractor advice to fit two cars and agreed to add gutters. Motion to grant passed 11-0. - Item 8 – 409 Eleanor Avenue (Applicant: Taylor Fording): Variance to allow 60% impervious cover (10% over the 50% limit) in front yard. Staff recommended denial. Applicant cited two recent shootings at his home and need to park a vehicle in front of his son's window for safety. Commissioner Barrington moved to grant a 10% variance (60% total); motion passed 9-2 (Chair Orion and Commissioner Cruz dissenting). - Item 9 – 1155 Arrowhead Trail (Applicant: Martin Lamas for Sherry Betty): Variance for 9-ft 11-in reduction in front setback to allow carport 1 inch from property line. Staff recommended denial, citing existing garage and potential character change. Applicant argued shallow front yard (20 ft) and need to protect vehicles. Motion to grant with conditions per submitted plan passed 11-0. - Item 12 – 126 West Carolina Street (Applicant: Ron Alvarado for AG Associates Architects): Variance for 4-ft 11-in reduction in side/rear setback to allow a 10-unit condominium building 1 inch from property lines (IDZ2 zoning). Staff recommended approval; LaValka Neighborhood Association supported; two oppositions noted. Motion to grant passed 10-0. Key Outcomes - Votes: All items received the required supermajority. The only votes with dissent were Item 4 (9-2) and Item 8 (9-2). - Conditional Approvals: Item 1 tied to plans dated September 30, 2025; Item 6 limited to east/rear fence with 7-ft height and 7-ft 6-in posts; Item 7 included addition of gutters; Item 9 incorporated post setback per submitted plan. - Administrative: Approved meeting calendar for 2026 (second and fourth Mondays, with adjustments for holidays) and minutes from September 22, 2025. - Next Steps: Applicants were reminded to apply for building permits within one year (or decision becomes void) and to consult staff for compliance details.

[The San Antonio Planning Commission met on September 24, 2025, at 2:00 PM. The meeting featured a consent calendar, a postponed item (Item 8), and consideration of a rezoning request (Item 9). An announcement was made that quorum would be lost before reaching Item 10, forcing its automatic postponement. The meeting adjourned at 2:33 PM due to lack of quorum.] Consent Calendar - The consent calendar included all agenda items except 8, 9, and 10, and covered Item 12 and the minutes from the previous meeting. The motion to approve passed unanimously (Commissioners Milam, Orion, Desuki, López, Delec, and Sigo voting yes; Commissioner Bustamante recused at that time). Public Comments & Testimony - Item 9 – Rezoning request at 63 Cross Montreal (Cross Mountain Trail): Staff reported that seven letters of support and three letters of opposition were received. Seven members of the public registered to speak, all expressing opposition to the rezoning. - George Richmond, a 37-year resident, raised concerns about water consumption, dangerous curves with two recent crashes, high traffic volume, zoning restrictions, and an apparent discrepancy in the property address used for the application. - Rafael Goico, a 25-year resident, stated that the property has been used as an event venue and does not comply with requirements. He argued the rezoning would increase traffic, light pollution, and threaten wildlife, and could lead to more intensive commercial uses such as a tire shop or liquor store. - Natalie Mason highlighted safety risks for children crossing near school zones, wildlife (deer) crossings, lack of street lighting, and concerns about private water wells depleting. She also worried about property devaluation and precedent for other commercial uses. - Joaquín Mira emphasized the unique beauty and tranquility of the neighborhood, stating that commercial development would destroy property values and the character of the area. Discussion Items - Item 9 – Rezoning amendment to the Military Protection Area Plan: The applicant (Kellen Griffin of Fairmont) requested a two-week postponement to October 8, 2025, to allow more time to communicate with the community. Staff recommended denial of the rezoning. JBSA had no objection. Commissioner López asked about the property’s exclusion from Cross Mountain Ranch restrictive covenants, noting a 2013 removal of restrictions after 25 years. The applicant argued the lot (T8) was never properly platted within the subdivision and the inclusion was an error. After discussion, the commission voted unanimously to postpone the case to October 8. - Vote on postponement: Commissioners Bustamante, Milam, Desuki, López, Delec (Ublet), Orion, and Sigo voted yes. Motion passed. - Item 10 – Not considered: Quorum was lost during Item 9 deliberation. The chair announced that Item 10 could not be heard and would be automatically postponed to the next meeting on October 8, 2025. Public speakers were encouraged to return. Key Outcomes - Consent calendar approved unanimously. - Item 8 (previously postponed) remained postponed. - Item 9 postponed to October 8, 2025, to allow further community engagement. - Item 10 not considered due to loss of quorum; automatically postponed to October 8, 2025. - Meeting adjourned at 2:33 PM. Note: The meeting date provided by the instruction (2025-09-24) differs from the transcription's original mention of "dos de la tarde" in September 2004. The instruction date has been used.