Public Meetings - Sandy, Utah

The Board of Adjustment convened to review a variance application from the Thompsons regarding setback deviations on a corner lot in the R18 zone, while also addressing administrative updates to Board procedures and officer elections. Throughout the meeting, Board members and staff analyzed whether the applicant's lot possessed unique conditions sufficient to meet the five statutory criteria for granting a variance, ultimately concluding that the hardships were not unreasonable or unique enough under state code. The Board also voted on procedural rule changes to align with recent state legislation and moved to maintain the current leadership structure. Consent Calendar - No specific consent items were listed; the meeting proceeded directly to hearing the variance application and subsequent agenda items. Public Comments & Testimony - Applicant (Mr. Thompson): Expressed full support for his own application, arguing that the lot possesses unique attributes (narrowing south side, angled boundary, and a 30x30 foot drainage easement) that create an unreasonable hardship not faced by other properties. He admitted to relying heavily on a contractor during a period of personal medical hardship (brain tumor surgery) and taking the contractor at face value regarding permit status, but emphasized his 20-year construction background and family's awareness of city codes. - Wendy Jensen (8291 Drive A Circle): Asked for clarification on funding, specifically requesting to know if tax dollars would cover utility moves if the variance were granted. - Richard and Mrs. Steele (1330 Anything South): Clarified that the city purchased the land for a retaining wall directly from the property owners ten years ago, asserting that this transaction means the wall should not be an issue for the current variance request. They noted that the city has owned the land where the wall sits. Discussion Items - Variance Application (Thompson): - Applicant's Position: The applicant argued that the lot's unique shape (a 5-foot jog on the east side resulting in 25-foot vs. 30-foot setbacks) and the presence of a city drainage easement created a hardship that forced him to deviate from standard setbacks. He stated that without the variance, he would have to tear out walls to meet the 20-foot setback requirement on the south side. - Staff Position (Ms. Anderson): Staff maintained that the applicant did not meet all five criteria for a variance. They stated that the hardship appears self-imposed (due to the contractor's failure to follow code) and economic in nature. Staff noted that while a drainage easement exists, the appropriate remedy is a plat amendment to vacate the easement, not a variance to override setbacks. - Board Discussion: - Jim Everts: Questioned the uniqueness of the lot shape compared to other corner lots in the R18 zone, noting similar configurations exist elsewhere. He raised the issue of the sound barrier wall across the street and whether an easement existed there, discussing how the city may have acquired the land for the wall. - Tyler Brown: Argued that the narrowing geometry of the lot on the south side and the easement could constitute a "unique condition," potentially meeting the special circumstances criteria if combined with the shape. He questioned whether failing to grant the variance robbed the owner of a substantial property right. - Bruce Bjorner: Acknowledged the applicant's difficult personal history but emphasized that the Board must strictly follow the five criteria, noting that the Board has seen hundreds of variances in the neighborhood. He argued that the lot is not unique enough and that the variance is not essential to property enjoyment. - Consensus: The Board generally agreed that while the lot has some irregularities, the self-imposed nature of the hardship (due to the contractor's actions) and the availability of alternative solutions (moving walls) meant the criteria for "unreasonable hardship" and "special circumstances" were not fully met. - Amendment to Board of Adjustment Rules of Procedure: - Staff proposed changes to align with Utah House Bill 368, replacing references to "public hearing" with "public meeting" for variances and appeals. The Board discussed and confirmed that public input could still be allowed at public meetings, distinguishing them from legislative hearings. The Board also clarified the effective date of decisions based on the approval of minutes. - Election of Chair and Vice Chair: - Staff noted that alternates cannot hold the Chair or Vice Chair positions. The proposal to swap roles was deferred, and the Board moved to maintain the status quo for another year. Key Outcomes - Variance Denial: The Board unanimously voted to deny the variance request for the Thompson property. The motion carried with 4 votes in favor (Brian Jones, Brett Breiner, Matt Hill, Ryan Johnson) and 1 vote against (Jim Everts). The Board cited that the applicant failed to prove unreasonable hardship and that special circumstances were not unique enough to override the zoning code. - Rule Approval: The Board approved the proposed amendments to the Board of Adjustment Rules of Procedure by a voice vote (all in favor), making the changes effective upon the approval of minutes via email. - Leadership Status: The Board voted to maintain the current Chair and Vice Chair for the coming year to avoid procedural delays, with a plan to revisit elections next year. - Next Steps: Staff notified the applicant that they must modify their construction plans to conform to existing setbacks unless they choose to appeal the decision. Staff will also explore options with the property owner and utility departments regarding the potential vacatur of the drainage easement via a plat amendment.

The Sandy City Council convened on the evening of December 9, 2025, to conduct its regular business with a focus on honoring long-serving community members, establishing legislative priorities for the 2026 session, and addressing various operational updates. The meeting featured significant time dedicated to recognizing Wayne Niederhauser, Chief Gregory Severson, and Dan Medina for their retirements, followed by deliberations on the city's 2026 legislative agenda and the sale of surplus city properties. Consent Calendar - Approved the reappointment of members to various special committees. - Approved the adjournment of the November 11 draft meeting minutes (with the 2026 annual meeting schedule resolution temporarily removed and amended later). - Adopted resolution 25-53C setting the 2026 City Council annual meeting schedule, amended to cancel the September 29th meeting and reinstate the September 8th meeting. Public Comments & Testimony - Henry Butters: Expressed strong frustration regarding the city's watch program, stating he felt unfairly denied participation despite military clearance, and raised concerns about homeless encampments impacting his safety and property. He specifically criticized Police Captain Amy Bryant for yelling at him on the phone, stating, "No one should be yelled at," and threatened legal action if such treatment continued. - Darren Butler: Provided positive testimony regarding the Sandy Library (a county facility within Sandy), encouraging residents to utilize its free resources, including LinkedIn Learning, technology checkouts, and community programs. Discussion Items - Special Recognitions: The Council honored Wayne Niederhauser (State Homeless Services Coordinator), Chief Gregory Severson (30-year Police Chief), and Dan Medina (37-year Parks & Recreation Director). Council members expressed positions of deep gratitude, praising Niederhauser's advocacy for homeless services, Severson's steady leadership during difficult transitions, and Medina's community-focused spirit and stewardship of city parks. - 2026 Legislative Priorities: The Council reviewed a preliminary list of legislative priorities. - Mayor Zoltanski presented priorities focusing on local land use authority, affordable housing, Little Cottonwood Canyon transportation (supporting immediate bus services), public safety funding, and water utility resilience. - City Attorney Lynn Pace provided context on the upcoming legislative session, noting the need for a unified municipal voice. - Council Member Robinson expressed support for the list and advocated for the addition of a priority protecting municipal property taxing authority against state caps, which he described as a necessary

The Sandy City Planning Commission convened on December 4, 2025, to review four agenda items concerning land development code amendments, architectural facade redesigns, and site plans for the Silver Sage Business Park. The meeting featured presentations from city staff and developers regarding a zoning matrix refinement for the Automall District, a facade modification for the Smith Entertainment Group's redevelopment of the former Macy's building, and a combined site plan and infrastructure project for financial services and fiber optic utility operations. Public comments addressed noise mitigation concerns from adjacent residents and opposition to the utility station's classification. The commission approved all four motions with specific conditions regarding landscaping and noise buffers, and finalized the election of the new Chair and Vice-Chair. Consent Calendar - Approval of the minutes from the November 20, 2025, meeting. Public Comments & Testimony - Steve Van Marin (10407 Banber Parkway, Suite 207): Expressed conditional support for the Smith Entertainment Group project but suggested adding a peaked roof articulation over the entrance to better frame the shopping center hallway. - Ryan Fowler (10908 Savannah Drive): Expressed support for developing the "weedy lot" but voiced strong concern regarding the lack of sound buffering for his residence, noting the property faces heavy traffic noise from 700 East. He requested the developers consider addressing the noise issue. - Travis Ackerman (828 East Savannah Drive): Expressed gratitude for the trail but echoed the noise concerns, requesting a variance to require a 15-foot landscape buffer with tall evergreen trees at the back of the property to protect residents and trail users. - Mark Scott (1080 Savannah Drive): Expressed adamant opposition to the Middle Mile Infrastructure Utility Station. He argued the facility does not meet the intent of the professional office zone (SD), is not a legitimate public utility, lacks data on electromagnetic field safety, and poses a hazard to the community. He requested the denial of the conditional use permit. - Todd Bobang (via Zoom, South Carolina): Clarified technical details regarding noise mitigation, confirming the CMU walls are designed to mitigate both site and road noise, and stated that the facility's electromagnetic levels are within World Health Organization guidelines. Discussion Items - Automall Zone Land Use Matrix Amendment: Planning Director Mike Wilcox explained the staff-initiated amendment to Title 21 to align land uses with the district's purpose, specifically restricting non-dealership uses in the Automall dealership subdistrict. The Automall Dealers Association provided a letter of support. The commission discussed ensuring only dealership-related uses remain in the subdistrict. - Smith Entertainment Group (SEG) Redevelopment (Phase Three): Architect Rob Cottle presented the request to replace the west facade of the former Macy's building with a Class A office elevation, including aluminum screens for solar gain reduction and architectural treatments. Commissioners praised the design, with Lenise Davenport noting it was an improvement over the previous block wall. Steve Van Marin offered a suggestion on the roofline. Cameron Duncan expressed that while he found the design awesome, he wished the project included a "pop-up" on the roof to align with the nearby mountain basketball and Jazz themes, though he affirmed he would not vote against it based on that alone. - Silver Sage Business Park 2 (Navigate Private Wealth & Middle Mile): - Office Building Site Plan: Applicants Scott Bunnell and Kyle Spencer proposed consolidating two lots to build a financial services office. Public commenters Ryan Fowler and Travis Ackerman raised concerns about noise from 700 East and requested evergreen tree buffers. Staff and applicants discussed balancing crime prevention (via wrought iron viewing fences) with noise screening, ultimately agreeing to revise the landscape plan to include evergreen trees on the east side of the parking lots. - Middle Mile Utility Station: AECOM representative Christina Lewis presented the proposal for a fiber optic booster station and emergency generator. Mark Scott opposed the use, arguing it violates the zone's intent and lacks safety data. Staff Director James Sornson clarified that the definition of "public utility station" in the code includes telecommunications and quasi-public utilities, affirming the facility's eligibility for a conditional use. The utility was confirmed to use natural gas generators tested monthly, with noise projections well below street noise levels. Craig Kitterman abstained from the vote due to a conflict of interest or lack of sufficient understanding, though staff advised that abstentions are generally reserved for members not present for the presentation. Cameron Duncan noted he had not voted "no" even though he felt the objections hadn't been fully addressed, prompting a discussion on the importance of deliberating concerns before voting. Key Outcomes - Automall Zone Amendment: Motion carried (Unanimous 8-0). The Planning Commission recommended a positive vote to the City Council to amend Title 21 of the Sandy Municipal Code regarding land uses within the Automall zone district. - Smith Entertainment Group Facade: Motion carried (Unanimous 7-0). The Planning Commission approved the modified site plan, building architectural design, colors, and materials for Phase Three of the redevelopment at 1045 South State Street. - Silver Sage Business Park 2 - Site Plan: Motion carried (Unanimous 8-0). The Planning Commission approved the preliminary site plan for the Navigate Private Wealth Office Building, adding a condition that trees on the east side of both parking lots be revised to evergreen species (within the 60/40 split requirement) to mitigate street noise. - Silver Sage Business Park 2 - Subdivision: Motion carried (Unanimous 7-1, Craig Kitterman Abstained). The Planning Commission terminated the preliminary subdivision review for the consolidation of the two commercial lots. - Middle Mile Infrastructure - Site Plan: Motion carried (7-0, Craig Kitterman Abstained). The Planning Commission approved the preliminary site design for the public utility station at 10935 South 700 East. - Middle Mile Infrastructure - Conditional Use: Motion carried (7-0, Craig Kitterman Abstained). The Planning Commission approved the conditional use permit for the fiber optic booster station. - Leadership Election: Danny Schoenfeld was elected Chair and Lenise Davenport was elected Vice-Chair for the next six months. - Meeting Cancellation: The December 18, 2025, meeting was officially canceled due to a lack of sufficient agenda items. - Procedural Clarification: Staff clarified that under City Code Article 11, a member present for the presentation cannot formally abstain from voting; they must vote "Yes" or "No" or recuse themselves by withdrawing from the meeting entirely. - Vote Irrelevance: The commission noted that Craig Kitterman's abstention did not affect the outcome of the Middle Mile votes as a majority of "Yes" votes was achieved regardless.

The Sandy City Planning Commission convened on November 20, 2025, to deliberate on four new development proposals, including a subdivision, an EV charging station conversion, and a townhome community, alongside receiving a detailed legal update regarding a recent federal court decision involving a local developer's appeal. Consent Calendar - The Commission approved the minutes from the November 6, 2025, meeting. - Community development staff reminded the Commission of the December 1st holiday social and the distribution of set point items from the Mayor. Public Comments & Testimony - Benson Lewis, Reed Evans, and Todd Eaves (neighbors of Falls Creek Estate): Expressed significant concerns regarding potential flooding, stormwater runoff from Wasatch Boulevard, and geotechnical hazards on the steep slopes. They argued that the development of additional impervious surfaces could cause water damage to their downhill properties and requested independent peer-reviewed geotechnical reports prior to approval. - David Chapman (neighbor): Stated full concern about soil stability, view obstruction, and the lack of public notice regarding building permits. He opposed the project, citing historical landslides in Draper and urging strict adherence to height and setback standards to prevent catastrophic drainage issues. - Steve Van Merrin (via Zoom): Voiced concern regarding the adequacy of street width on Lost Edge Boulevard (Wasatch Boulevard) for future traffic and driveway access. - Alton White (neighbor): Expressed full support for the IONA EV charging station, noting the scarcity of charging infrastructure in the area. - James Swanson (Community Development Director): Emphasized support for the Sandy Station townhome project, describing the current site as an "eyesore" and stating that the project offers a necessary opportunity to beautify the corridor and provide attainable housing for diverse populations. Discussion Items - Falls Creek Estate Subdivision: Staff presented a request to reconfigure two parcels in the Cedar Ridge subdivision (now Falls Creek) to create two buildable lots, including a special exception to bypass sidewalk and park strip installation due to the lack of curb and gutter on Wasatch Boulevard. The public and staff discussed drainage mitigation, the use of sensitive overlay zones (slopes 30%), and the distinction between subdivision review and building permit requirements for geotechnical data. Staff clarified that the city will eventually install street improvements via a cash-in-lieu agreement. - IONA EV Charging Station: Staff presented a proposal to convert a vacant former gas station at 151 West 1060 South into a private, 12-station Electric Vehicle charging hub. The applicant described the project as a private, fully funded facility offering Level 3 fast charging and a customer waiting area. No public opposition was noted. - Sandy Station Townhomes: Staff presented a development of 63 townhomes by DR Horton/Interim Capital on a complex, irregularly shaped site. The applicant requested multiple exceptions to the Cairns district standards, including reduced articulation, alternative exterior materials (fiber cement instead of brick/stone), modified setback lines, and reduced pedestrian mews width. In exchange, the developer offered enhancements such as elevated landscaping, architectural lighting on buildings, and improved landscaping along the UDOT frontage. David Kelly and a representative for the seller discussed the project's goal of creating "attainable" (non-subsidized) housing for first-time buyers without government subsidies. Key Outcomes - Falls Creek Estate: Approved two motions. First, to grant the special exception for the partial waiver of street improvements (no sidewalks/park strips) subject to three findings. Second, to determine the preliminary subdivision review is substantially complete subject to eight conditions. - IONA EV Charging Station: Granted preliminary modified site plan review approval based on two findings and eight conditions. - Sandy Station Townhomes: Granted preliminary site plan review approval (5 findings, 9 conditions including enhanced landscaping) and preliminary subdivision review approval (2 findings, 7 conditions). The motions were adopted by a vote of 7-0. - Falls Creek Estate: Adjournment motion carried. Next meeting scheduled for December 4, 2025.

This meeting of the Sandy City Council and Mayor, convened on November 18, 2025, to address fiscal year-end carryovers, a contentious public hearing regarding a property rezoning application following the 2025 general election, and canvassing of election results. The session included extensive public testimony reflecting deep community division over campaign conduct, with citizens offering strong positions of support and opposition regarding the behavior of candidates and the integrity of the recent election. The meeting concluded with a closed session regarding real property discussions after a Zoom technical interruption prevented the recording of subsequent remarks. Consent Calendar - Adopted Resolution 25-49-C (Governmental Funds Carryover) unanimously (6-0). - Adopted Resolution 25-50-C (Governmental Funds Carryover) unanimously (6-0). - Adopted Resolution 25-51-C (Governmental Funds Carryover) unanimously (6-0). - Convened as the Sandy City Redevelopment Agency and adopted Resolution RD 25-04 (RDA Budget Carryover) unanimously (6-0). - Adopted minutes for the July 29, 2025, RDA meeting by voice vote. Public Comments & Testimony - Patty O'Goot (Applicant): Expressed gratitude for the opportunity to discuss her property's compliance and requested support for the rezoning to resolve long-standing zoning violations. She stated a firm position that the property is intended as a family compound and not a speculative development, and she expressed willingness to spend money to attach structures to achieve compliance if necessary. She positioned herself as a responsible community member committed to resolving issues collaboratively. - Chad Westover: Expressed strong support for Councilmember Cindy Sharkey and a position of opposition against claims labeling her a "liar" or "criminal." He cited her strict adherence to fair campaign pledges as evidence of her character. - Carl Luan: Expressed a position that Councilmember Cindy Sharkey should be removed from office due to alleged lies and a cover-up of a lie. He stated that her actions were self-centered and demanded she pay the consequences of her bad acts. - Nick Milovich: Expressed concern regarding the high monetary cost and partisan nature of the recent election. He expressed a position urging the council to discard past political grievances and work together for the community's best interest. - Henry Butters: Expressed support for the Police Chief. He voiced concerns regarding homeless encampments and the illegal parking of school buses on residential streets. He expressed a position of offense regarding the Mayor's lack of personal outreach compared to other council members. - Steve Proctor: Expressed deep appreciation and support for Councilmember Cindy Sharkey. He recounted how she personally assisted him during a fence dispute, contrasting her approach with others. - Craig Ulrich: Expressed a position that the public comment period following the election was a disgrace. He stated a belief that Mayor Zoltansky's campaign signs violated the Fair Campaign Practices Pledge timeline and advocated for the pledge to be made mandatory. - Jean Corey and Robin Lee: Both expressed a position of support for Councilmember Cindy Sharkey, describing the recent campaign behavior as bullying. They expressed a desire for civility, unity, and for the council to forgive past grievances. - Jude and Gracia: Expressed a position that Councilmember Cindy Sharkey was complicit in the actions of a Political Action Committee (PAC) that ran negative ads. They argued that despite signing a pledge, she did not repudiate the attacks and stated that she should resign. - Telinda Larson: Expressed support for Jude's presentation and a position that the city council must ensure such a smear campaign is not repeated in the future. - Mary Barton and Phyllis Ackerman: Both expressed unwavering support for Councilmember Cindy Sharkey, citing her integrity, hard work, and history of helping constituents resolve local issues like flooding and street lights. They stated a position that she deserves to continue serving. - Lance Sof: Expressed full support for Mayor Zoltansky and strong appreciation for Councilmember Cindy Sharkey, stating she is a great asset who votes based on what is best for all of Sandy, not political lines. - Ken Barton: Expressed support for Cindy Sharkey, highlighting her role in successful annexation efforts and her problem-solving skills without forcing agendas on others. - Mayor Steve Newton: Expressed a position of disturbance regarding the post-election conduct. He stated that the tradition of generosity in victory was breached and urged the Mayor to lead a move toward civility. - Heather DuPat: Expressed disappointment regarding the election tactics. She stated a position that the campaign was dominated by smears and paid social media rage-baiting, which failed residents and set a poor example for future generations. - Tim Shumway: Expressed support for Mayor Zoltansky in a position that urges the council to "lead and squash this" negativity. He stated a belief that the council has an opportunity to move on from the division. - Rita Lee: Expressed strong support for Councilmember Cindy Sharkey, stating a position that the council should not deny the citizens' right to have their voted-for representative serve. She argued against censure or removal. - John Lee: Expressed a position that the recent behavior of the council resembled "immature high school students bullying someone." He urged the council to stop the behavior and act like adults. - Jeff Koch: Expressed support for the election results and a position that the contentious campaign wake up politically "asleep" citizens. He stated a preference for Cindy Sharkey's direction for the city. - Don Cann: Expressed a position that Councilmember Cindy Sharkey should not resign or step down. He called for the council to support her and work together. - Susan Updike: Expressed a position that the campaign rhetoric was ridiculous and urged the council to calm down, get along, and treat the situation with civility regardless of political affiliation. - Patricia Jones: Expressed strong support for Councilmember Cindy Sharkey, citing her personal assistance in resolving jurisdictional and service issues for their neighborhood. - Andrei Terasov: Expressed appreciation for Sandy City's non-partisan nature compared to county government. He stated a position of support for unity and asked the council to stay together. - Terry Harakasi: Expressed disappointment regarding the campaign conduct, stating it was unlike the Cindy Sharkey she knew. She argued that if the attacks were not her doing, she should have stepped in to stop them. - Mike Marker (Online): Expressed a position of concern that the campaign shifted to partisan attacks involving a PAC. He stated that while Ms. Sharkey may not have broken the law, she violated her own pledge regarding ethical campaign behavior and should have stopped the negativity. - Sandra Hawk (Online): Expressed concern that Ms. Sharkey's behavior was beyond the pale and misrepresented votes. She stated a position that the council should place campaign conduct on the agenda for future regulation. - Scott Drysdale (Online): Expressed a positive position regarding the new naming of the recreation center as the "Sandy Community Recreation Center," questioning the utility of changing the name to avoid taxpayers' money for naming rights. - Sid Lannham (Written): Expressed support for Cindy Sharkey, stating a position that it is American for the winner to let the loser serve and that the focus should shift back to serving citizens. - Curtis Patterson (Written): Expressed support for Cindy Sharkey, citing her honesty, reliability, and ability to solve problems calmly. - Kathleen King (Written): Expressed a request for the council to address holistic farming for community health. Discussion Items - Fiscal Year End Carryovers: Staff presented the year-end process for carrying over uncompleted projects and reallocating savings in the governmental funds (Resolutions 25-49-C, 50-C, 51-C) and the RDA (Resolution RD 25-04). No significant dissent was recorded; the items were procedural. - Creek Road Rezoning (Item 3): Council members debated the rezoning application for the Goot property from R140 to R115A. Councilmember Sharkey and DeKaiser inquired about the history of the zoning and the specific non-compliance issues. Councilmember Robinson noted the uniqueness and complexity of the case, expressing comfort in letting the process work out future compliance issues. Councilmember Sharkey and DeKaiser expressed concern regarding future animal rights (specifically large farm animals) allowed under the new zone and the precedent of zoning for non-compliance. The applicant clarified the intent for the property as a family compound. - 2025 General Election Results: City Recorder Wendy Downs presented the certified results. Vote totals were read for Mayor (Zoltansky 15,220; Sharkey 9,599), Council at large (D'Souza 15,665), District 1 (Christensen 2,378; Davis 2,033), and District 3 (Nickel 4,385; Williams 3,333). Turnout was noted at 45.2%. - Public Comment Period (Post-6 PM): The discussion shifted to the contentious nature of the recent election. Multiple speakers addressed the alleged use of smear campaigns, the role of the "Residents for Sandy's Future" PAC, and the violation of the Fair Campaign Practices Pledge. Councilmember Stroud and others expressed a position that the council must address the financial reporting of PACs and campaign conduct before the new year. Mayor Zoltansky reflected on the divisiveness of the campaign, stating that while she did not sign the pledge, her actions were guided by integrity, and she called for the council to regulate PACs and heal the community. - Admin Reports: The Council received updates on the Public Utilities Management Study interviews, the Historic Committee meeting, Youth Council tour of the fleet building, and the River Oaks coat/food drive. Retirements were announced for Police Chief Severson, Deputy Mayor Bell, and Parks Director Medina. - Technical Issues: The meeting experienced a Zoom crash during the Mayor's remarks, preventing the recording of her full address and the subsequent public comment. Staff and Council agreed to proceed with a written submission of the Mayor's comments and a closed session to be recorded separately. Key Outcomes - Passed: Ordinance 25-26 (Creek Road Rezoning to R115A) with a vote of 4-2 (Mayor Zoltansky, District 3, Robinson, and District 1 supported; District 2 Sharkey and District 5 DeKaiser opposed; Councilmember Stroud abstained). Note: Transcript lists vote count as 4-2 with one abstention, but implies District 5 DeKaiser voted No, Sharkey voted No, Stroud Abstained, and Robinson, Meekham, D'Souza, Houseman voted Yes. Correction based on transcript: "Mr. Robinson, yes, Mr. Meekham. Yes, Ms. T'Susa. Yes, Mr. DeKaiser. No, Miss Stroud. I will be abstaining... Ms. Houseman. Yes. Ms. Sharkey. No." Final tally: 4 Yes, 2 No, 1 Abstention. - Passed: Adoption of 2025 General Election results (8-0). - Passed: Motion to adopt resolutions 25-49-C, 25-50-C, 25-51-C, and RD 25-04 (All 6-0). - Deferred: Discussion on campaign conduct, PAC financial reporting, and the workshop schedule. Council agreed to defer the workshop to a future meeting in December due to meeting length and closed session constraints. - Agreed: To move into a closed session to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property following the technical difficulties. The Mayor's written comments will be added to the record. Standing Reports and Administrative Updates - Upcoming Interviews: Public Utilities Management Study interviews scheduled for the following Thursday; council members requested to submit scoring sheets by Wednesday night. - Retirements: Chief Severson (Dec 26), Deputy Mayor Bell (Dec 1), and Parks Director Medina (Dec 29). Captain John Arnold named Interim Chief of Police; Captain Corey Hess extended service to Dec 2026. - Events: Coffee with a Cop held (Nov 15); Neighborhood Watch meeting scheduled for December; Oath of Office ceremony for Mayor set for January 5. - Legislative Concerns: Potential state legislation regarding property tax limitations and cost of living adjustments noted as a concern for the next session. - Expo Center: AI software for safety (facial recognition, weapon detection) to be implemented; study on convention facility needs commissioned by the county.

The Sandy City Council convened on November 11, 2025, a Veterans Day observance, beginning with a prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance. The agenda featured a special recognition for the retirement of Pam Roberts of the Wasatch Front Waste and Recycling District, an informational presentation by the Utah Office of Homeowners Association Ombudsman, public hearings and discussions on zoning, budget carryovers, and the Alta Canyon Recreation Center, followed by extensive public comments regarding recent campaign conduct and ethics. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: The Council unanimously approved the draft meeting minutes for the October 21st and October 28th meetings. Public Comments & Testimony - Campaign Ethics & Conduct: Multiple speakers, including Sandra Hawk, Drew Howells, Don Sigwell, Wendy Davis, Holly DeVries, Jude and Gracia, and Laurie Wilson, expressed deep concern regarding the recent municipal elections. Positions included claims that Councilmember Cindy Sharkey failed to stop a "corrosive" and "dishonest" campaign by PACs affiliated with her, citing "dark money," "disinformation," and the "theft" of political signs as unlawful and unethical. Several speakers called for Sharkey's resignation, demanded campaign contribution limits, and urged the implementation of an ethical code of conduct. - Sign Ordinance: Sandra Hawk suggested amending sign ordinances to allow signs on fences rather than stakes, reducing clutter and wind risk, while Kathy Spuck proposed banning signs 45 days before primaries to reduce voter fatigue. - HOA & Financial Concerns: A speaker expressed concerns about the long-term financial stability of HOAs and the lack of transparency in their governance. - Recreation Center: Pat Jones suggested opening a public naming process for the new Alta Canyon facility and urged the Board to ensure membership fees remain affordable to avoid over-reliance on taxpayer subsidies. Discussion Items - Recognition of Pam Roberts: Councilmember Marcy Houseman and other members praised Pam Roberts for her 28 years of service as the founding director of the Wasatch Front Waste and Recycling District. Roberts expressed gratitude for her tenure and announced her retirement, though she noted she would remain active in non-executive capacities. - Utah Office of HOA Ombudsman: Aaron Ryder presented on the new state office's registry, advisory opinion process, and educational role. He highlighted that nearly all new housing in Sandy is within HOAs and warned of the financial instability risks for homeowners if HOAs fail to maintain reserves. Councilmember Zach Robinson noted that HOAs function as a "shadow government" and requested resources to help cities navigate these entities, expressing a position that cities should have better tools to manage HOA impacts. - Creek Road Rezone (Item 3): The Council reviewed an application to rezone a 1.5-acre property from R140 to R115A to allow for farm animal rights and increased accessory structures to bring existing non-compliant structures into compliance. Councilmember Aaron DeKaiser expressed skepticism about using a rezone merely to fix compliance issues when the applicant has no intention of raising animals. The applicant, Joe Goot, clarified the property is a "family compound" and he is willing to modify structures to achieve compliance. The item was tabled for further deliberation on November 18th. - South Salt Lake Valley Mosquito Abatement District: Florence Reynolds and Dan McBride presented a proposal to increase the property tax rate by approximately $77 cents for a $600,000 home to address inflation and operational costs. Councilmember Ryan Meekham expressed full support, stating he would "take the dollar" to "kill those little buggers," citing public health concerns regarding West Nile virus. The item is scheduled for a public hearing on December 8th. - Annual Budget Carryover (Item 4): Brian Kelly presented the carryover process, noting $1.37 million in general fund savings were being re-appropriated for projects including fleet vehicles, the Alta Canyon Recreation Center, and street reconstruction. Councilmember Ryan Meekham raised concerns about the lack of detail in the equipment list and the complexity of the financial tracking format. Councilmember Cindy Sharkey questioned the negative balance in the Public Works Phase Two budget, which was clarified as a result of delays in the sale of a specific property parcel needed for funding. - Boundary Adjustments (Item 8): The Council voted unanimously (7-0) to adopt Ordinance 25-25, amending Title 21 to align state law regarding property line adjustments. - Alta Canyon Recreation Center Update: Staff presented a construction update and proposed a name change from "Alta Canyon Sports Center" to "Sandy Community and Recreation Center" to better reflect the facility's citywide scope. Councilmember Zach Robinson expressed disappointment at the omission of the historical "Alta Canyon" name. Councilmember Houseman and Councilmember Sharkey supported bringing the community into the naming process. The Board of Trustees voted unanimously to authorize the boundary line adjustment (moving the lot line 10 feet east) to accommodate the new building footprint. Key Outcomes - Resolution on Code Amendment: Ordinance 25-25 (Boundary Adjustments) was adopted by a 7-0 vote. - Boundary Line Adjustment Authorization: The Board of Trustees for the Alta Canyon Recreation Special Service District voted 7-0 to authorize the Chair to sign the boundary line adjustment agreement. - Meeting Adjournment: The Council recessed to convene the Alta Canyon Recreation Special Service District Board of Trustees meeting and subsequently reconvened to proceed to a closed session. - Closed Session Motion: The motion to enter closed session to discuss the purchase/exchange/lease of real property and the deployment of security personnel devices passed by a 7-0 vote.

The Sandy Planning Commission convened on November 6, 2025, to address three specific development applications involving signage, accessory structures, and sensitive area restoration. The meeting also included administrative updates regarding the city's upcoming development code rewrite and an open forum discussion on strategies for managing community opposition (NIMBYism) in planning processes. Consent Calendar (No specific items were placed on the Consent Calendar; all agenda items were presented with individual deliberation and voting.) Public Comments & Testimony - Speaker 1 (Identity Unrecorded): Expressed concern that the public engagement process for planning items is moving too slowly, potentially causing frustration among taxpayers. - Speaker 2 (Self-identified as a mother from a neighboring city): Raised the position that there is an "undeniable connection between housing and zone policy and racism," characterizing modern anti-development sentiment as a form of systemic racism. - General Commentary: Multiple panelists (Paul Alred, Chris Hupp, Nick) noted that opposition to development often includes misinformation regarding property values, traffic capacity, and safety, though no specific public testimony supported these claims directly during the specific item discussions where public comment was opened and closed without speakers. Discussion Items - Strategies for Managing NIMBYism: - Data and Education: Panelists emphasized the necessity of using data-driven responses to counter myths, such as the misconception that low-income housing lowers property values (citing a Gardner Institute study showing a 10% increase). Speakers expressed that educating the public on zoning limitations and facts is critical to reducing unfounded opposition. - Visualization and Technology: The panel discussed the importance of using visual aids (e.g., view corridor simulations, scale models) to help residents understand the actual impact of proposed density and building heights, contrasting this with the "dark side" imagination residents often resort to when lacking information. - Engagement and Process: Strategies recommended included meeting with vocal opponents privately before public hearings ("meeting trouble in the parking lot"), slowing down the process to allow for additional public education, and securing third-party experts to add credibility to technical findings like traffic studies. - Planning Commission Conduct: Paul Alred stressed that planning commissioners must "speak the truth" and refuse to cave to public clamor or misinformation. He expressed strong support for city staff having a formal role in selecting planning commissioners to ensure the commission remains moderate and knowledgeable. He also noted the irony of recruiting NIMBYs who are "bright" to serve on the commission, provided they can be trained to follow the process. - Systemic Issues and Classism: In response to a question about racism, panelists acknowledged that opposition often reflects classism, as the demographic most capable of attending meetings (affluent, time-rich individuals) often disproportionately opposes housing for service workers. They discussed using moderate-income housing reports to highlight where workforce housing is actually located versus perceived. - Hill Center Theater Sign Amendment: Discussion focused on the applicant's request for four signs. The applicant clarified that the lettering on the rehearsal hall sign would be "routed and backed with acrylic" and illuminated, rather than simple vinyl lettering, to maintain consistency with the Hale Center Theatre theme. - Russian's Accessory Structure: The commission discussed a request for a 2,618-square-foot garage with a 24-foot height increase. Staff confirmed setbacks were met, with the structure set back 15 feet on the rear property line, exceeding the 11-foot requirement. - Restoration in Sensitive Area (400 East Tonya Drive): A contentious discussion occurred regarding grading standards. The applicant proposed restoring slopes to a maximum 2:1 grade, but Commissioner Duncan noted the terrain appeared steeper. Staff and the Chair deliberated on whether to strictly enforce the 2:1 code standard or modify the condition to require "restoration to existing conditions" as feasible, acknowledging a potential conflict between the ordinance and geological reality. The final decision maintained the requirement but ensured staff review would verify the slope matched neighbor lots as closely as possible. Key Outcomes - Approval Granted: Unanimous vote (7-0) to approve a sign theme amendment for the Hill Center Theater (MacU Center) at 9886 S Monroe St. - Approval Granted: Unanimous vote (7-0) to approve a conditional use permit for an accessory structure (garage) for John Russian at 135 E 110th S, including increased height and size. - Approval Granted: Unanimous vote (7-0) to grant a special exception for restoration in a sensitive area overlay zone at 400 E Tonya Dr, subject to seven conditions. - Minutes Approved: Unanimous vote to approve the meeting minutes from October 16, 2025. - Future Agenda Items: - Development Code Rewrite: Staff announced a 18-month process to rewrite the development code, with a consultant selection expected within a couple of weeks. - Housing Workshops: City Council is scheduled to review final housing workshop concepts on November 18, potentially leading to faster code drafting for specific housing types separate from the main code rewrite. - Future Meetings: Upcoming meetings are scheduled for November 20, December 4, and January 15 (the only January meeting, as December 18 falls on New Year's Day). - Administrative: The meeting adjourned following the discussion of the city's social event at the Mortimer residence.

The Sandy City Council convened on October 28, 2025, to review land development code amendments regarding state-mandated boundary adjustments, discuss a comprehensive traffic solutions study for SR 209, address public safety concerns following a recent homicide in Historic Sandy, and review standing reports on legislative updates and tourism funding. The meeting concluded with a unanimous vote to enter a closed session to discuss pending litigation before adjourning. Consent Calendar - The Council unanimously approved the consent calendar, which included a proclamation recognizing November 1st as "Extra Mile Day" and the approval of the October 14, 2025 draft meeting minutes. Public Comments & Testimony - Sharon Jensen (resident of Historic Sandy) expressed concern over a recent murder at Main Street Park and the area's reputation as a "black eye" for the city. She advocated for increased police patrols and deterrence strategies in the Historic Sandy corridor, specifically near the liquor store and the park, to improve resident safety. - Henry Butters (commercial trucking industry representative) expressed strong opposition to the proposed roundabouts on the SR 209 corridor, particularly near Little Cottonwood Canyon. He argued that roundabouts are dangerous and impractical for wide-load trucks and long-haul vehicles, citing specific incidents where brake failures on the canyon roads would result in catastrophic disasters if a roundabout were present. - Don Sidwell (resident of Historic Sandy) voiced deep concern regarding safety, alleging recurring suspicious activity and homelessness issues at Main Street Park that he felt were ignored by authorities. He expressed frustration with the city's perceived lack of support for the Historic Sandy community compared to other districts, specifically calling out at-large council members for not participating in or funding improvements in the area. Discussion Items Title One Amendments: Boundary Adjustments - Melissa Anderson (Zoning Administrator) presented amendments to the Land Development Code to align with Senate Bill 140, simplifying the process for boundary adjustments. The proposal distinguishes between "simple boundary adjustments" (no public meeting required) and "full boundary adjustments" (requiring subdivision procedures). The Planning Commission unanimously approved this recommendation. - Councilmember Sharkey questioned the authority of the City Director, seeking clarification that the Director would indeed approve both simple and full boundary adjustments after a public meeting for the latter. - Councilmember Robinson asked about the frequency of these adjustments. Anderson noted that while usage varies (e.g., four in one month previously), they generally occur between neighboring landowners seeking minor property line changes for mutual accommodation. SR 209 Solutions Development Study - Brittany Ward (Assistant Director/City Engineer) presented a study by UDOT and the city identifying long-term traffic solutions for the SR 209 corridor (9400 South) from 1300 East to Wasatch Boulevard. The study highlighted high crash rates (76% concentrated between 1300 East and Highland Drive) and proposed solutions including roundabouts, raised medians, signal timing adjustments, and bike lane expansions. - Councilmember Sharkey questioned the logic of proposed solutions, specifically the installation of roundabouts at high-volume intersections and the potential displacement of traffic into residential areas if left turns are restricted. She requested further analysis on traffic cut-through routes. - Councilmember Stroud expressed concern that the proposed changes, particularly roundabouts with average speeds of 15-25 mph, would create bottlenecks on a freeway-capable arterial road and noted the lack of a phased implementation plan for the entire three-mile stretch. - Councilmember De Kaiser advocated for a safety-first philosophy, suggesting speed limit reductions as a primary strategy and expressing skepticism about adding roadway access to commercial centers that currently protect parking lots. - Councilmember Robinson questioned the study's methodology, specifically the lack of new traffic counts and whether city development codes were a limiting factor in proposing alternatives like code changes instead of infrastructure hardening. Ward clarified that existing data was used to avoid redundant costs and that development codes serve as a framework for managing access points. - Mayor Zoltanski (via report) and Councilmembers expressed apprehension about the volume of change proposed along the corridor, noting potential issues with roundabouts at high-traffic intersections like Wasatch and Cottonwood. Councilmember Turkey emphasized enthusiasm for the proposed interim projects (signal timing improvements) while remaining skeptical of the long-term roundabout implementation without deeper study. - Staff and Council Consensus: The team agreed that the current study serves as a guide for future developments and that specific solutions require further detailed analysis, traffic modeling, and funding justification before implementation. UDOT and the City will collaborate on grant applications for specific projects. Historic Sandy Safety & Community Outreach - Mayor Zoltanski and Chief Sieberson addressed the recent homicide in Main Street Park. They reported an immediate increase in patrols, the installation of a new surveillance camera at the park, and the scheduling of "Coffee with a Cop" and "Pastry with a PUP" events for community engagement. The police department is actively seeking a Neighborhood Watch coordinator for the area. - Mayor Zoltanski also reported receiving a $460,000 reimbursement from the State Homeless Mitigation Fund to support the Mayor's Village and other services, including funding for new police and paramedic positions. Standing Reports & Good News - Councilmember Sharkey reported on legislative updates, including potential motor fuel tax reductions and discussions on property tax caps. - Councilmember Houseman thanked the parks and recreation team for their responsiveness regarding trail connectivity and shared positive feedback from a recent housing workshop. - Mayor Zoltanski shared significant news: the Salt Lake County Recreation, Tourism, and Arts Council (TRACK) board recommended a record $3 million grant for the Alta Canyon Recreation Center reconstruction, subject to final County Council approval. This award is contingent on a one-year project window and a potential expansion of the county's free rec program. Key Outcomes - Consent Calendar: Adopted unanimously (Motion carried). - Boundary Adjustments: Council accepted the information item regarding amendments to Title 21, Chapter 3 and Chapter 37; a formal decision on adoption is scheduled for November 11, 2025. - SR 209 Study: The study was received as an informational item. The Council directed staff to perform further detailed analysis on specific intersections (particularly roundabouts and left-turn restrictions) and traffic volumes before initiating construction, with implementation dependent on future funding and UDOT partnership. - Historic Sandy: Police department committed to increased patrols, camera installation, and community events "Coffee with a Cop" (Nov 15) to address safety concerns. - TRACK Funding: Mayor Zoltanski announced a recommended $3 million grant for the Alta Canyon Recreation Center, which requires Council deliberation and County Council final approval. - Closed Session: The Council voted 7-0 to close the meeting to discuss pending litigation (Vote carried: Yes=7, No=0). Attendees: Mayor Zoltanski, Lynn Pace, Martin Jensen, and James Sorensen.

A collaborative meeting was held on October 22, 2025, bringing together the Sandy City Council and leadership from the Metropolitan Water District (Metro Water) to discuss the historical relationship, water rights, infrastructure challenges, and financial commitments between the two entities. The gathering emphasized the concept of a "Metro water family," highlighting the long-standing partnership since Sandy's annexation in 1990, while addressing critical upcoming projects, including the rebuild of the Little Cottonwood Water Treatment Plant and various aqueduct replacements. Consent Calendar - No formal consent calendar items were recorded in the transcript; the meeting proceeded directly into an informational presentation and discussion. Public Comments & Testimony - Sandy City Council Member: Expressed deep appreciation for the historical context provided, noting the tangible connection between the district's 1930s formation and the 1850s/1930s era, citing personal ownership of a 1937 Chevy once driven by a nurse named Mabel as a tangible link to that history. The council member affirmed the importance of the partnership and the need for transparency to ensure trust is maintained between the cities and the water district. - Tom Godfrey (Chair, Metro Water Board): Expressed full support for maintaining open lines of communication, encouraging council members to directly call staff with questions, and affirmed that the current relationship ensures accountability to city councils regarding taxing authority. - Anne Lyne (Metro Water General Manager): Emphasized the "Metro water family" concept, stating that staff meet at least once a month and are available for direct consultation. Expressed a desire to ensure the Sandy City Council understands the complexities of water treatment and distribution to foster informed decision-making on tax and rate issues. Discussion Items - Historical Context and Annexation: - Speaker details the formation of the Metropolitan Water District in 1935 during the Great Depression and drought, noting Salt Lake City's lack of bonding capacity necessitated the creation of an independent entity. - Speaker explains Sandy City's petition for annexation (denied in 1980, approved in 1990) was driven by water demand projections, the high cost of acquiring independent supplies, and the desire to utilize the Little Cottonwood Water Treatment Plant. - Speaker notes the unique status of Metro as the only Utah district representing more than one city (Salt Lake and Sandy), governed by specific interlocal agreements regarding board composition and boundary annexation. - Infrastructure and Capital Projects: - Speaker outlines the current reliance on aging infrastructure, specifically the Little Cottonwood Water Treatment Plant, where original flocculation and sedimentation basins from 1960 pose reliability concerns. - Speaker discusses the "flipped" timeline for construction: The Little Cottonwood Water Treatment Plant rebuild is being prioritized to finish before the 2034 Olympics, while Salt Lake City's Big Cottonwood plant has been delayed due to revenue constraints. The goal is to avoid having two major plants under construction simultaneously. - Speaker mentions upcoming projects including the Salt Lake Aqueduct hardening (slip-lining), the Cottonwoods Connection (Pipeline Reach One), and the Raw Water Little Cottonwood Conduit Replacement to ensure resilience. - Water Sources and Financials: - Speaker details Sandy's access to Provo River Project water, Little Cottonwood Creek rights, and the Ontario Drain Tunnel water (2,766 acre-feet), which Metro manages to allow flexibility in divesting water rights if no longer needed. - Speaker compares Metro rates ($645/acre-foot) to Jordan Valley rates, asserting Metro's rates are competitive for Sandy. - Speaker notes upcoming property tax increases projected for fiscal years 2028-2031 and water rate increases of 6% in FY27-28 and 7% in FY29 to fund capital improvements. - Speaker clarifies the difference between Metropolitan Water Districts and Water Conservancy Districts, noting Metro does not have retail customers and has different statutory powers regarding tax rates and conservation focus. Key Outcomes - Project Timeline Adjustment: It was confirmed that the Little Cottonwood Water Treatment Plant rebuild will proceed immediately, with a target completion date prior to the 2034 Winter Olympics, effectively accelerating the project relative to Salt Lake City's delayed timeline. - Financial Commitments Identified: - Sandy City is currently paying approximately $1.1 million annually for the Ontario Drain Tunnel assessment, with the final payment due in 2031. - The Metro Water Project (associated with the tunnel) requires current payments of $4.2 million, dropping to $2.1 million by the final payment in 2036. - Rate and Tax Projections: The meeting highlighted projected water rate increases of 6% (FY27-28) and 7% (FY29), alongside property tax rate adjustments, to fund necessary infrastructure resilience and replacement. - Strategic Partnership: A mutual agreement was reaffirmed to maintain open communication channels, with Metro Water staff pledging accessibility for direct consultation to ensure Sandy City Councils understand the value and necessity of district investments.