Public Meetings - Shoreline, Washington

The Shoreline Planning Commission met on Thursday, June 18, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at City Hall. The meeting focused on a study item regarding the Affordable Housing Feasibility Study, presented by Community Services Manager Bethany Wolbrecht-Dunn. No votes were taken; the item was for discussion and input. Consent Calendar - The agenda was approved as presented. - The draft minutes of the June 4, 2026, regular meeting were approved as presented. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public signed up for oral comment, but four written communications were received and posted to the online agenda. The written comments were from Rebecca Chan, Buddy Smith, Kevin Atkinson, and Allison Luzader. The content of these comments was not read aloud during the meeting. Discussion Items - Affordable Housing Feasibility Study – Community Services Manager Bethany Wolbrecht-Dunn provided background on the city’s housing programs and the need for affordable housing, particularly for households earning 0–50% of Area Median Income (AMI). The study, conducted with consultant Berk, aims to identify and evaluate policy tools to produce new income-restricted affordable housing at 50% AMI and support permanent affordable homeownership for households below 80% AMI. Nine policy tools were presented: (1) modify Inclusionary Zoning (IZ) for deeper affordability, (2) Multifamily Tax Exemption (MFTE) for affordable ownership, (3) fee reductions/waivers for affordable housing, (4) new revenue for an Affordable Housing Trust Fund, (5) fee on new single-family homes, (6) Affordable Homeownership Program, (7) manufactured/modular construction techniques, (8) allowing tiny homes on wheels, and (9) a housing incentive marketing program. Evaluation criteria include city investment, beneficiaries, production, time to implementation, and cost effectiveness. Stakeholder engagement will include staff workshops, Council presentations, developer roundtables, and targeted interviews. - Commissioner Souza asked how the two goals were chosen; Ms. Wolbrecht-Dunn explained they were based on the Comprehensive Plan’s biggest gaps. - Commissioner Hadley voiced support for inclusionary housing and stressed the need for single-level, accessible housing, noting public comment on that topic. She also emphasized preserving existing affordable housing. - Commissioner Povick raised concerns about seniors being evicted because MFTE rents exceed Social Security, questioned how AMI is calculated (staff explained it uses King County AMI per state law), and asked why the city doesn’t lower the MFTE income threshold. Ms. Wolbrecht-Dunn noted that lower thresholds could affect feasibility and discourage development, and that current contracts are fixed. - Chair Brinson asked about Shoreline’s competitiveness for funding without a local housing levy; Ms. Wolbrecht-Dunn stated the city is not usually the applicant but collaborates with developers. - Commissioner Lorah appreciated the “menu” approach and asked about examples of success at the 50% AMI level, how the list was developed, and why A Regional Coalition for Housing (ARCH) was not included. Ms. Wolbrecht-Dunn explained challenges with ARCH membership (cost, council interest, and different funding dynamics) and noted that the nine tools were selected for their likelihood of meeting the two goals. Commissioner Lorah also urged studying the downstream effect of market-rate housing on naturally occurring affordable housing. - Commissioner Souza asked about rent subsidies for the 0–50% AMI group; Ms. Wolbrecht-Dunn agreed that ongoing rental assistance would be helpful but would require new revenue (e.g., a housing levy). She noted Council added $100,000 for emergency rent assistance this year. - Vice Chair Mosier suggested analyzing the city’s existing levies for potential reallocation when they expire; Ms. Wolbrecht-Dunn said she would look into it. - Commissioner Povick questioned who determines AMI for each MFTE building; Ms. Wolbrecht-Dunn clarified it is set by contract with the developer. She acknowledged that lowering the threshold could reduce developer interest and that multifamily development only pencils out in MFTE areas. - Commissioner Souza asked about direct engagement with renters or prospective homebuyers; Ms. Wolbrecht-Dunn said Berk will work with affordable housing groups, especially on homeownership, but no open house is planned. Key Outcomes - No formal decisions or votes were taken. The study is ongoing; preliminary findings are expected to be shared with the City Council in fall 2026, with final recommendations by the end of 2026. - The next Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for July 2, 2026, and will include light rail sub-area updates. - The meeting was adjourned at 8:07 p.m.

The Shoreline City Council held a regular meeting on Monday, June 8, 2026, from 7:00 PM to 7:47 PM in Council Chambers. All seven council members were present. The meeting included a proclamation of Juneteenth, public comments, approval of the consent calendar, adoption of an ordinance amending the surface water utility code, and a discussion on authorizing eminent domain for a stormwater facility property. Proclamation of Juneteenth - Mayor Robertson proclaimed June 19, 2026 as Juneteenth in Shoreline, encouraging celebration and action toward racial justice, equity, and inclusion. Consent Calendar - Approved unanimously (7-0) the following items: - Approval of Workshop Dinner Meeting Minutes (May 11, 2026) and Regular Meeting Minutes (May 4, 2026). - Approval of Expenses and Payroll as of April 24, 2026, in the amount of $13,658,521.80. - Waiving Council Rule of Procedure 3.6 and adoption of Ordinance No. 1061, making transportation impact fee exemptions for qualifying businesses retroactive to March 31, 2026. - Authorizing the City Manager to execute a Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment 3.2 with FORMA Construction for Hillwood Park improvements: $7,371,391.24 plus $1,315,228.72 in remaining associated sales taxes. - Authorizing the City Manager to execute a Local Agency Agreement with WSDOT to obligate $2,350,000 in grant funds for the NE 175th Street Safety Improvement Project (5th Ave NE to 15th Ave NE). Public Comments & Testimony - Mark Scott (Shoreline resident) expressed concern about multiple unrelated people living in a single home and home businesses in residential neighborhoods. He stated a prior letter to the city received a dismissive response and requested a more thoughtful reconsideration. - Norbert Steele (Shoreline) strongly opposed the use of surveillance cameras from companies like Flock or Axon, arguing the public does not want them, that they disproportionately impact lower-income residents, and threatened political consequences if implemented without a better approach. - Bob Danson (Olympic View Water & Sewer District) thanked staff for adding protections to proposed Ordinance No. 1058 but reiterated concerns about infiltration affecting public drinking water sources due to PFAS and other contaminants. He requested the city continue working toward a durable protection framework and give weight to the district's hydrogeological study. - Laethan Wene (Shoreline) thanked the council for their service. Discussion Items Action on Ordinance No. 1058 – Surface Water Utility Code Amendment - Staff (Tricia Juhnke and Zachary Richardson) presented proposed amendments to Shoreline Municipal Code Chapter 13.10 for a special drainage area near Olympic View Water & Sewer District. The amendments respond to earlier concerns about PFAS and groundwater protection. - Key recommendations: retain prohibition on deep injection wells, require project notification to Olympic View, add site activity restrictions (e.g., on crumb rubber), add AKART-style language (similar to Edmonds), and maintain non-UIC infiltration in all zones while allowing UICs in residential areas with special pretreatment for commercial sites. - Staff explained that Edmonds' stricter approach (banning all infiltration in wellhead protection areas) is not appropriate for Shoreline due to different soils and the absence of exposed aquifer capture zones. They noted that Edmonds is conducting a PFAS study and Shoreline will review it. - Councilmember Ademasu expressed concern about water quality reaching the aquifer. She asked about staff expertise (confirmed no in-house hydrogeologist) and the need for emerging contaminant filters similar to Lake Forest Park's pilot. She stated she was "51%" supportive of the ordinance due to remaining concerns. - Councilmember Mork asked whether King County was consulted; staff said they build off state and county manuals but had no direct consultation. - Councilmember Scully supported the ordinance as striking the right balance, noting the area is small and mostly single-family zoned. - Vote: Motion by Councilmember Scully, seconded by Deputy Mayor Pobee. Passed 7-0. Study Item – Ordinance No. 1060 (Eminent Domain for Stormwater Facility) - Staff (Sarah Anderson, Surface Water Manager) presented the need to acquire property at 10 NE 176th St (King County parcel no. 616390-1364) for a stormwater facility to address severe flooding that smaller measures have not resolved. - The property was for sale in 2023 but title insurance issues prevented purchase. The city now proposes condemnation as a last resort after negotiations. A quiet title action will determine ownership and compensation. - Councilmember Roberts confirmed the facility is in the Surface Water Master Plan. - Councilmember Ademasu noted coordination with the NE 175th Street safety improvement project on the consent calendar; staff confirmed the projects are complementary. - Councilmember Snyder asked about unresolved property ownership. City Attorney Margaret King explained the eminent domain process includes quiet title, with the court deciding the recipient of compensation. The purchase price is based on highest and best use and unaffected by title uncertainty. - Mayor Robertson stated the item will return on the June 22 consent calendar for final action unless directed otherwise. Key Outcomes - Ordinance No. 1058 adopted unanimously (7-0). - Consent calendar approved unanimously (7-0). - No action taken on Ordinance No. 1060; discussion held, final action scheduled for June 22, 2026 on the consent calendar.

The Shoreline Planning Commission met on Thursday, June 4, 2026 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at Shoreline City Hall. The meeting included a public hearing on the Public Benefit Rating System (PBRS) for Ching Community Gardens, followed by a study session on the 2026 Development Code Amendments. The commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the PBRS application and discussed several code amendment topics. Consent Calendar - The agenda was approved as presented. - The draft minutes of the May 21, 2026 regular meeting were approved as presented. Public Hearing – Public Benefit Rating System – Ching Community Gardens Staff Presentation: Intergovernmental Programs Manager Jim Hammond presented the application by GROW, a nonprofit, for a 27,000-square-foot property at 6160 Greenwood Avenue North. King County recommended a 10-point PBRS credit, equal to a 50% reduction in property taxes (reducing assessed value by nearly $450,000 and cutting taxes to about $4,500), with the remaining tax burden spread across other Shoreline properties. The hearing examiner held a county public hearing on May 20; the commission was asked to transmit a recommendation to the Shoreline City Council, who could adopt it as early as June 22. Public Testimony: Eric Todderud, President of GROW's Board of Directors, thanked staff and noted a disagreement with the county regarding conservation easement points. GROW had a restrictive covenant in place (executed 2023), but the county determined it did not meet the stricter criteria for a conservation easement in perpetuity. He expressed hope to work with the county to execute a satisfactory covenant. King County Response: Bill Bernstein (King County) explained that the conservation easement component is still being resolved. If the hearing examiner finds the current covenant insufficient, GROW has until the end of the year to rework it. No further hearings would be required; the adjustment would be handled administratively. Commission Discussion: Commissioners confirmed that the recommendation would not need to be revisited if the easement issue were resolved later. Commissioner Povick moved to recommend approval of the PBRS as in Exhibits A and B of the staff report; Commissioner Souza seconded. The motion, after brief discussion, passed unanimously on a roll call vote. Discussion Items 2026 Development Code Amendments Senior Planner Steve Szafran reviewed about 20 staff-initiated amendments grouped into five categories: - Daycares: Aligning definitions and site design requirements with recent state legislation (e.g., family daycare client increases, bicycle parking requirements, exemption from public space requirements). - Subdivisions: Clarifying permit expiration timelines, prohibiting mid-process changes of subdivision type, and allowing extensions for preliminary subdivision approval when active permits exist. - Building and Site Design: Reducing fenestration requirements in Neighborhood Residential and Townhome design standards; clarifying that overlapping standards (e.g., counting pedestrian access as open space) are not allowed (flexibility retained via administrative design review); clarifying parking in front-yard setbacks within driveways or drive aisles. - Traffic Impacts: Requiring traffic calming measures in commercial/mixed-use zones adjacent to lower-density residential areas; requiring a Traffic Impact Analysis for developments generating more than 27 people trips (converted from previous 27 vehicle trips to align with adopted multimodal level of service). Commission Questions: - Vice Chair Mosier supported reduced fenestration requirements. He asked for confirmation that parking in front-yard setbacks is allowed even without a garage; staff confirmed. - Commissioner Lorah questioned the rationale for disallowing overlapping site design standards, expressing concern about flexibility on small sites. Staff explained that the change eliminated confusing language while preserving administrative design review flexibility. - Commissioner Lorah asked about the switch to 27 people trips and whether that includes transit trips. Director Bauer noted the conversion aligns with multimodal level of service and likely results in no net change to the threshold, though mitigation may differ. He offered to bring back detailed information from the traffic engineer. - Vice Chair Mosier requested a clearer picture of what 27 people trips looks like to ensure it does not overburden desired pedestrian- and bicycle-oriented development. A public hearing on the 2026 Development Code Amendments is scheduled for July 16, 2026. Key Outcomes - Public Benefit Rating System – Ching Community Gardens: Unanimous motion (6-0) to recommend approval to the Shoreline City Council. Code amendment discussion will continue; a public hearing is set for July 16. The next regular meeting is June 18, 2026, which will include a briefing on the affordable housing program and feasibility study.

The Shoreline City Council met on Monday, June 1, 2026 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber, Shoreline City Hall, to conduct a regular meeting. The meeting included two proclamations, city manager and council reports, public comment, approval of the consent calendar, and action on two resolutions. The council approved the consent calendar unanimously, adopted the 2027-2032 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) with an amendment to reinstate the Meridian Ave N bike lane project, and voted 7-0 to place a ballot measure on the November 2026 general election to establish a Metropolitan Park District (MPD) for constructing and operating a recreational pool facility. Proclamations - Pride Month: Deputy Mayor Pobee proclaimed June 2026 as LGBTQ Pride Month. Roberto Lopez, speaking on behalf of No Hate in Washington State, requested the council consider a resolution opposing anti-trans ballot initiatives. - National Gun Violence Awareness Day: Deputy Mayor Pobee proclaimed June 5, 2026 as National Gun Violence Awareness Day. Juliet Scarpa, volunteer with Moms Demand Action, highlighted statistics: over 130 Americans killed daily by gun violence (47,000 annually), firearms as leading cause of death for children, and 68% of Washington gun deaths by suicide. Consent Calendar - Approved regular meeting minutes from April 13 and April 27, 2026. - Authorized the City Manager to execute a law enforcement training exercise agreement with the King County Sheriff’s Office. - Authorized a professional services contract with Fehr & Peers for $149,908 for the Eastside Off-Corridor Bike Network Pre-Design Study. - Motion by Councilmember Scully, seconded by Councilmember Ademasu, passed 7-0. Public Comments & Testimony - Ken Pitts (Shoreline resident, Vice President of Local 206 Carpenters) urged the council to support union labor and area standard wages on public projects. - Brian Kelly advocated for strong labor standards to combat the underground economy, emphasizing fair pay and benefits. - Charlotte Aborah (Everett resident) expressed strong support for the proposed pool, citing public health, safety, youth development, and quality of life. - Mary Carrow (Shoreline) raised concerns about unmaintained grass and fire hazards at James Keough Park, as well as a broken fence, and requested the city address these liabilities. - Dan Adams (Shoreline) requested a hot tub be included in the pool facility, arguing its omission lacks vision and that the community cannot add it later. He noted the previous bond measure failed partly due to scope, not the hot tub. - Dia Dreyer (Shoreline) opposed the Metropolitan Park District, stating it circumvents public oversight and will increase property taxes. She estimated a $500 annual cost for a median home and noted only 439 people (about 0.5% of population) responded to the online survey. - Norbert Steele (Shoreline) reported repeated vandalism of anti-racist signs in his yard and expressed frustration about city understaffing across departments. - Scott Menzies (Shoreline) supported a model resolution against anti-LGBTQ+ ballot initiatives, calling them homophobic and transphobic. Discussion Items - Resolution No. 561 – 2027-2032 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP): Senior Transportation Planner Alan Budde and Transportation Manager Kendra Dedinsky presented. Changes from the public hearing on May 4, 2026 included: reinstating the Meridian Ave N bike lane project (N 175th Street to N 200th Street) as an unfunded project, splitting the North City Connector Light Rail project into two phases, and correcting a calculation error in the summary spreadsheet. Staff recommended adoption. Councilmember Roberts moved to adopt the resolution as recommended. Councilmember Snider moved an amendment to include the Meridian project as unfunded. Debate centered on prioritization: Councilmember Scully opposed the amendment, stating the project originally appeared only due to a grant opportunity and inclusion would skew priorities. Councilmember Snider, Mayor Robertson, and Councilmember Ademasu supported it for public safety and interest. The amendment passed 4-3 (Ayes: Snider, Mork, Robertson, Ademasu; Nays: Pobee, Roberts, Scully). The main resolution with the amendment then passed 7-0. - Resolution No. 562 – Placing a Ballot Measure to Establish a Metropolitan Park District for a Pool Facility: Senior Management Analyst Hillary De La Cruz presented. The resolution would place a proposition on the November 3, 2026 general election ballot asking voters to create the Shoreline Metropolitan Park District to fund acquisition, construction, operation, maintenance, and expansion of a recreational pool facility. Key details: anticipated initial levy rate of 55 cents per $1,000 assessed value (maximum 75 cents), generating $8.8 million annually to cover debt service and operations. For a median home valued at $831,000, the estimated annual property tax increase would be $421 (about $35/month). The election cost is $150,000, included in the 2025-2026 budget. If passed, user fees would help cover costs. Next steps include recruiting pro and con committees for voter pamphlet statements. Councilmember Roberts moved to adopt, seconded by Ademasu. Discussion included tax impacts on seniors (state law prohibits exemption for MPD; seniors with frozen values pay on lower basis) and Multifamily Tax Exemption (MFTE) properties (exempt during their period). Councilmember Ademasu supported, citing drowning prevention statistics: from 2018-2024, 190 preventable drownings in King County, double previous years. The resolution passed 7-0. Key Outcomes - Consent Calendar: Approved 7-0. - Resolution No. 561 (TIP): Adopted 7-0 with an amendment to include the Meridian Ave N project as unfunded; amendment passed 4-3. - Resolution No. 562 (Pool Ballot Measure): Adopted 7-0. Staff will advertise for pro/con committees; council to appoint members on July 13, 2026. - Meeting adjourned at 8:29 p.m.

The Shoreline Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Thursday, May 21, 2026, beginning at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at City Hall. Chair Leslie Brinson presided. Commissioners present: Bradley Cabe, Julie Povick, Katie Lorah, Matthew Souza. Vice Chair Christopher Mosier and Commissioner Hadley were absent with notice. Staff in attendance: Andrew Bauer, Hayley Barnett, and Sierra Carson. The meeting focused on a briefing of the ongoing Tree Code Update, including discussions from the Community Advisory Group (CAG), and included public comments on the topic. The meeting was adjourned at 8:33 p.m. Consent Calendar - The agenda was accepted as presented. - The regular meeting draft minutes of April 2, 2026, were accepted as presented. Public Comments & Testimony Four members of the public delivered oral comments; five additional written comments were submitted (by Claudia Turner, Kathleen Russell, Jonelle Kemmerling, Boni Biery, and Lance Young). - Kathleen Russell, Shoreline resident, expressed concern that the proposed tree density credit program may be insufficient to maintain the existing 37.1% tree canopy and achieve the goal of 40% by 2050. She suggested increasing the multipliers to at least 1.0 in MUR-35’, MUR-45’, and MUR-70’ zones and other areas that have lost the greatest percentage of canopy. - Lance Young, Shoreline resident, emphasized the importance of trees for a livable city, citing research on crime reduction near trees. He distributed and described Kenmore’s exceptional tree removal notice process (including a 21-day public comment period, mailed notices to neighbors, and plot plans) as a model for Shoreline. - Jonelle Kemmerling, Shoreline resident, expressed strong concern about whether Shoreline can meet its goals to preserve and increase tree canopy while providing a livable city. She noted that the staff report indicates the city is still evaluating whether to require tree retention in MUR-35 and MUR-45 zones, which she called a grievous error that would disproportionately impact disadvantaged neighborhoods. She urged the city to balance housing and tree preservation without placing the burden solely on homeowners. - Boni Biery, Shoreline resident, recommended that shrubs not be counted as trees for tree density credits, that the city provide a list of banned noxious trees (including birch and Bradford pear), and that existing noxious trees not be counted. She also urged the city to offer guidance on tree species most likely to succeed in a changing climate. Discussion Items Tree Code Update Briefing 2 Senior Planner Sierra Carson presented a detailed briefing on the ongoing Tree Code Update, summarizing the work of the Community Advisory Group (CAG) over its first five meetings. Key topics covered: - Community Advisory Group feedback: The CAG supported giving more credit to high-value trees (large, native, groves), scaling requirements by zone, prioritizing retention, and requiring planting. - Tree regulation landscape: Carson outlined how trees are regulated across city departments: Planning & Community Development (tree code, landscaping, critical areas), Public Works (street trees, right-of-way), Parks (urban forest management), and Stormwater (native vegetation programs). The Tree Code Update focuses on private property tree removal and development. - Tree density approach: The group chose a tree density method (based on diameter at breast height) because it is objective, scaleable by zone, administratively efficient, and gives more credit to larger, mature trees. The goal is to create a minimum tree density per zone, not a percentage of existing trees. - Retention-first approach: For Neighborhood Residential (NR) zones (80% of the city), the proposal is to require retention of as many trees as possible, up to a point where development potential is limited. The rule: no retention requirement shall reduce development potential below 90% of the maximum allowed hardscape. Properties with high tree density must retain above the minimum; properties with low density must plant to meet the minimum. Trees are credited based on DBH, with a maximum credit at 24” DBH. Larger trees and groves are prioritized. - Mixed-use and commercial zones (MUR, station areas): The CAG was split on whether to require retention in these zones. Trade-offs include loss of open/public space, added complexity, and potential reduction in housing units and affordable housing, especially on small infill sites. The CAG will continue discussion at its next meeting. - Private property tree maintenance: Staff proposes moving from a three-year removal allowance to an annual allowance (number of trees per calendar year) with a permit, but not allowing speculative clearing. Minor development (e.g., decks, small additions) may not trigger the full tree density requirement. - Next steps: CAG final meeting on June 16, 2026; open house part of City Learn series; draft code presented to Planning Commission on July 16, 2026; summer engagement; public hearing August-October. Commissioner Discussion/Questions - Chair Brinson asked about the intersection between Planning and Public Works regulations regarding right-of-way trees and noted that setbacks flexibility was discussed but not currently in the code. She also clarified open space vs. public space definitions. - Commissioner Povick raised concerns about wildlife impacts from upcoming Public Works projects on Meridian and urged coordination between departments. - Commissioner Souza asked how the 90% hardscape number was determined (staff cited benchmarks from Bothell (85%) and Kirkland (max FAR)). He inquired about the requirement for an arborist (for any development triggering minimum tree density, before permitting). He also asked about the justification for a 24” DBH credit cap (to encourage planting by not allowing one very large tree to satisfy all credits). - Commissioner Lorah asked about the negotiation process between applicant and staff for tree retention (e.g., relocating utilities, shifting building footprint), and whose call it is ultimately. She expressed concern that retention requirements could disproportionately impact small infill sites, which are critical for middle housing, and potentially price out small developers. She asked whether analysis has been done on interaction with the state Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) bill (staff stated tree regulations are allowed but more guidance is expected summer 2026). She requested more rigorous cost-benefit analysis (units lost, project viability) when the draft code returns. - Commissioner Cabe asked if property owners are required to replace trees that naturally die (currently not required; may be discussed at next CAG meeting). - General stance: Commissioners were generally supportive of the retention-first approach and the move away from percentage-based requirements. Key Outcomes - No votes or formal decisions were taken. The meeting was purely informational, providing an update on tree code development. - The next Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for Thursday, June 4, 2026, at 7:00 p.m., featuring a public hearing on the Ching Gardens public benefit rating system and the first study session on 2026 development code amendments.

The Shoreline City Council met on Monday, May 18, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber. The meeting included presentations from Einstein Middle School students on a proposed city flag redesign, an overview of the CityWise civic education program, and a discussion of the Affordable Housing Feasibility Study. The Council also held a 30-minute executive session on litigation. The consent calendar was approved unanimously, and the meeting adjourned at 9:12 p.m. Consent Calendar - Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes of April 6, 2026, and Workshop Dinner Meeting Minutes of April 13, 2026. Motion by Deputy Mayor Eben Pobee, seconded by Councilmember Keith Scully, carried 7-0. Public Comments & Testimony - Christopher Potter (Shoreline resident) questioned whether the housing problem is a lack of inventory or high costs, and advocated for a public ownership (social housing) model, citing Seattle’s recent initiative. - Frank Cable (Shoreline) asked about construction delays at Brugger’s Bog Park, an abandoned vehicle, and suggested establishing a Veterans Pride Month. - Sarah Kennedy (Shoreline, CityWise alum) expressed strong support for the CityWise program, praising its role in fostering community and civic literacy. - Scott Menzies (Shoreline, CityWise alum) thanked the Council for supporting CityWise and emphasized the importance of hyperlocal engagement for democracy. - Anthony Portugal (Shoreline, CityWise alum) described how the program changed his understanding of city government and praised staff coordination. - Trish Woolcott (Shoreline, CityWise alum) complimented the program and suggested including content on how written goals become actual policies. - Written comments were received from Oliver J Moffat, Irvin Hwang (on CityWise), and Logan Schmidt (on Affordable Housing). Discussion Items Einstein Middle School Shoreline Flag Proposal Brent Holland, art teacher at Einstein Middle School, and four students (Amilia Galuska, Alex Petek, Cooper Rogers, Simon Barrett) presented proposed flag designs. Each design incorporated symbols such as 14-point stars for neighborhoods, waves for waterways and Native tribes, and mountains. Councilmembers praised the initiative, the representation of Native heritage, and the thoughtful design. Councilmember Roberts asked about the absence of trees and supported a community-wide process. Councilmember Ademasu supported a student-led effort with staff. Mayor Robertson thanked the students and noted the Council will consider next steps toward a community-designed flag. (Councilmember Roberts left at 7:38 p.m.) CityWise Civic Education and Engagement Course Overview Bethany Wolbrecht-Dunn, Community Services Manager, and Mallory Van Abbema presented a recap of the program, which started in 2016 and has completed 10 cohorts. They highlighted curriculum, attendance trends (largest cohort 28, potential capacity 40), and participant feedback requesting meals, childcare, and alumni networking. Future directions include hybrid or bite-sized formats, reconnecting with Shoreline School District, reviving multilingual Community Bridge content, and a formal closing exercise. Councilmembers praised the program and offered suggestions: Councilmember Scully supported expanding without formal KPIs and suggested a hybrid option; Deputy Mayor Pobee asked about alumni tracking; Mayor Robertson suggested partnerships with community organizations and hosting off-site. Affordable Housing Feasibility Study Discussion Kevin Ramsey of BERK Consulting presented the study, funded by Council, to provide a strategic, data-driven analysis of affordable housing tools. Two goals were proposed: producing new income-restricted housing at or below 50% AMI, and supporting permanent affordable homeownership for households below 80% AMI. Nine policy tools were outlined: 1) Modify inclusionary zoning for deeper affordability; 2) Expand MFTE to ownership projects; 3) Fee reductions/waivers; 4) New revenue for Housing Trust Fund; 5) Fee on large single-family homes; 6) Affordable homeownership programs; 7) Manufactured/modular construction incentives; 8) Tiny homes on wheels as ADUs; 9) Housing incentive marketing program. Councilmember Scully emphasized social housing concepts, partnering with King County, caution on single-family home fees, and focus on 50% AMI. Councilmember Ademasu recommended lowering AMI targets for homeownership, prioritizing modular construction, pre-approved architectural plans, a Section 8-style subsidy, term-limited staff positions, partial fee waivers, developer roundtables, and addressing lack of 2- and 3-bedroom units. Councilmember Snider asked about unhoused residents; Councilmember Mork requested inclusion of financing and insurance costs and supported pre-approved plans. Deputy Mayor Pobee asked about timeline for the homeownership program—preliminary findings expected in fall. Next Council touchpoints planned for September and December 2026. Key Outcomes - Consent Calendar: Approved 7-0. - Flag Proposal: Council expressed support for initiating a community-driven flag redesign process, with student input. - CityWise: Council provided general support for expansion, hybrid options, childcare feasibility, and alumni engagement. Staff will explore partnerships and alternative formats. - Affordable Housing Study: Council provided direction to prioritize tools that serve households at or below 50% AMI, consider social housing partnerships, evaluate modular construction and pre-approved plans, and assess financial impacts of fee waivers. Staff will return with preliminary findings in fall 2026 and final recommendations by December 2026. - Executive Session: Held from 8:42 p.m. to 9:05 p.m. for litigation discussion (RCW 42.30.110(1)(i)); no action taken. - Adjournment: 9:12 p.m.

The Shoreline City Council held a regular meeting on Monday, May 11, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. in Council Chambers at City Hall. The meeting included a proclamation of Jewish American Heritage Month, reports from the City Manager and Councilmembers, public comment, unanimous approval of the consent calendar, and a detailed discussion of Resolution No. 562 to place a ballot measure for a Metropolitan Park District (MPD) to fund a new indoor pool facility. No action was taken on the resolution; it is scheduled to return for a vote on June 1, 2026. Consent Calendar - Approved the regular meeting minutes of March 23, 2026 (note: the attached draft minutes are dated March 30, 2026, a discrepancy), and the workshop dinner meeting minutes of March 23, 2026. - Approved expenses and payroll as of April 24, 2026, totaling $2,117,895.35. - Authorized the City Manager to execute Amendment 4 to Contract 10091 with Northwest Hydraulics Consultants, Inc., in the amount of $133,509 for the Lower Storm Creek Erosion Management Project. - The motion to approve the consent calendar was made by Deputy Mayor Pobee, seconded by Councilmember Ademasu, and passed 7-0. Public Comments & Testimony - Steve Yoder (Kenmore) spoke about noise pollution from illegally modified exhaust systems, requesting enforcement and budget allocation for noise detection devices. He noted the cost of retrofitting his condo windows at approximately $21,800. - Selena Glemaher (Everett), representing Oxford House Incorporated, described the peer-supported recovery housing model and invited Council to the premiere of a documentary on June 20 at the Rialto Theater in Tacoma. - Dan Adams (Shoreline) expressed concern that the draft pool plan lacks a hot tub, arguing it is a key amenity for working-age adults and could affect voter support. He criticized the focus on changing rooms and urged inclusion of a hot tub to avoid repeating the 2019 bond measure failure. - Joseph Smith (Shoreline) raised safety concerns about traffic speed, lack of sidewalks, speed bumps, and signage in the Parkwood neighborhood, especially after a pet was killed. He requested traffic calming measures. - Laethen Wene (Shoreline) called for more specialized recreation programs in the city, disagreeing with the Recreation Director’s assessment that current offerings are sufficient. Discussion Items - Study Item 8A: Resolution No. 562 – Pool Ballot Measure - Hillary De La Cruz, Senior Management Analyst, presented the staff recommendation to place a Metropolitan Park District (MPD) measure on the November 2026 general election ballot to fund construction, operation, and maintenance of a 48,000 sq. ft. indoor pool facility at 17828 Midvale Avenue N. The facility would include a leisure pool with lazy river, an eight-lane lap pool with starting platforms and two one-meter diving boards, and a hydrotherapy pool (warm water, 90-94°F) instead of a hot tub. - The proposed ballot language includes a maximum levy rate of $0.75 per $1,000 assessed value, with an anticipated initial rate of $0.55 per $1,000 to generate approximately $8.8 million annually. Construction is estimated at $95 million, financed through 20-year bonds with $7.25 million annual debt service. An operating subsidy of $1.55 million (from MPD revenue, not the General Fund) would keep user fees affordable. For a median-valued home ($831,000), the annual tax impact is estimated at $421 ($35/month). Election costs are estimated at $150,000. - Councilmember Roberts asked about the hot tub vs. hydrotherapy pool decision. Mary Reidy, Recreation Director, explained that hydrotherapy pools are more heavily used for therapy and classes, and hot tubs have higher maintenance costs. The facility is at 10% design. - Councilmember Snider raised concerns about the regressivity of the tax, noting that multifamily tax exemption (MFTE) units exempt some properties, placing a heavier burden on single-family homeowners. She requested clarification on MFTE calculations. Councilmember Scully countered that the tax is uniform across all properties and that everyone can use the pool regardless of residence; he cautioned against complicating the funding structure. He expressed support for the staff recommendation, noting the importance of keeping the project under $100 million. - Deputy Mayor Pobee requested alternatives to the planned part-time labor hours given competitive hiring, and asked about schedule risks and communication plans for future recreational facilities. He also confirmed that the $1.55 million operating subsidy comes from MPD revenue, not the General Fund. - Councilmember Ademasu strongly supported the measure, citing the value of swim lessons in preventing drownings (drowning deaths in King County doubled from 15/year before 2018 to 30/year from 2018-2024) and the importance of water safety for all ages. - Councilmember Mork thanked staff and noted the hunger for a pool in the community. - Mayor Robertson expressed support and noted she would be traveling but planned to attend the June 1 meeting remotely. Key Outcomes - The consent calendar was approved unanimously (7-0). - No action was taken on Resolution No. 562; the council provided feedback and staff will return with a revised resolution for a vote on June 1, 2026. - The council expressed general support for placing the MPD pool measure on the November 2026 ballot, with a majority of members indicating they would vote in favor.

The Shoreline City Council held a regular meeting on Monday, May 4, 2026, at 7:00 PM in Council Chambers. The meeting included proclamations recognizing Asian/Pacific American Heritage Month, National Bike Month, and Mental Health Awareness Month, as well as a public hearing and discussion on the 2027-2032 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). Key topics included staffing shortages affecting project delivery, a returned grant for Meridian Avenue bike lanes, and the city's reliance on grant funding for capital projects. Consent Calendar - Approved by unanimous 7-0 vote: - Approval of March 6-7, 2026 Strategic Planning Workshop Meeting Minutes - Approval of March 9, 2026 Workshop Dinner Meeting Minutes - Authorization for City Manager to execute a construction contract with Laser Underground and Earthworks, Inc. in the amount of $3,477,833 for the 2026 Sewer Pipe Repair and Replacement Project Public Comments & Testimony - General Public Comment (before public hearing): - Gordon Black, North Sound Bicycle Advocates Boardmember, expressed gratitude for the city's biking progress and urged council not to remove the Meridian Ave N bike lane project (N 175th to N 200th) from the TIP. - Norbert Steele, Shoreline resident, questioned why the bike lane project was removed due to staffing shortages. He noted Shoreline is 41% below the average full-time employee per 1,000 residents compared to comparable cities and suggested hiring more staff. He also asked staff to study the cost of establishing a city police department instead of contracting with the King County Sheriff’s Office, noting a 20% cost increase this billing cycle. - Public Hearing on Resolution No. 561 – Transportation Improvement Plan: - Lee Lambert, Shoreline resident and Executive Director of Cascade Bicycle Club, expressed concern about the removal of the Meridian Avenue bike lane project. He cited USDOT studies showing bike lanes reduce crashes for all users and asked questions about the amount of grant funding returned, why other projects were prioritized, and whether the loss was solely due to staffing. - Oliver Moffat, Shoreline resident, raised concerns about cyclist safety and questioned the high costs and staffing issues. He noted that the Meridian bike lanes were simply paint on pavement yet cost nearly a million dollars, and questioned why the city cannot complete such projects despite returning grant funding. Discussion Items - Public Hearing and Discussion of Resolution No. 561 - 2027-2032 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) - Staff Presentation: Senior Transportation Planner Alan Budde explained the TIP is a six-year plan required by state law, setting priorities and informing the Capital Improvement Plan. Adoption is required by end of June 2026; formal adoption is scheduled for June 1. - Funding Summary (presented by Kendra Dedinsky, Transportation Planning Manager): - Total six-year annual programs: $18.9 million - Fully or partially funded projects: $124.4 million - Projects beyond 2033: over $148 million - Approximately 45% of 2027-2032 funding is non-local (primarily grants) - Preservation programs (pavement, sidewalk, signal rehab) are underfunded; only $1.2 million annually ($11 million over six years) - Grant market is unpredictable due to federal climate initiatives and economic fluctuations. - Council Discussion: - Councilmember Scully expressed frustration that staff did not alert council earlier about the Meridian bike lane project cancellation due to staffing. He requested future heads-up before projects with dedicated grant funding are abandoned. - Councilmember Snider asked for clearer budget detail on REET and VLF allocations. She suggested pursuing smaller, more feasible projects (MVPs) rather than large, unfunded corridors. - Councilmember Roberts supported breaking large projects into smaller phases, noting the city has done great work but should consider available resources. - Councilmember Ademasu requested staff separate Segment E (180th Street) from the North City Light Rail Connector and prioritize it as a standalone phase due to public safety concerns. She also asked about sidewalk rehabilitation program costs ($460,000 annually) and explored tree preservation techniques like permatrack. - Deputy Mayor Pobee discussed the challenge of hiring for limited-term grant-funded positions and suggested internally funding projects if external grants are too restrictive. - Mayor Robertson asked why the Meridian bike lanes were removed entirely rather than moved to the unfunded category. She expressed support for grouping projects for efficiency and for future staffing discussions. - Councilmember Scully opposed artificially elevating the Meridian project in the prioritization matrix due to the grant mishap, noting other network gaps exist. - Councilmember Ademasu and Deputy Mayor Pobee supported adding the Meridian bike lanes back as an unfunded project. Key Outcomes - The public hearing was held; formal adoption of the TIP is scheduled for June 1, 2026. - Council directed staff to consider adding the Meridian Avenue bike lane project back to the TIP as an unfunded project for future funding opportunities. A final decision will be made at the June 1 adoption meeting. - Staff will evaluate breaking the North City Light Rail Connector project into phases, particularly Segment E (180th Street), as requested by Councilmember Ademasu. - Council requested improved communication from staff when projects with dedicated grant funding are at risk of cancellation. - Staff will include a budget request to convert a limited-term position to full-time in the engineering capital delivery group to address staffing shortages. - No formal vote was taken on Resolution No. 561; final action is scheduled for June 1, 2026. The meeting was adjourned at 8:10 PM.

The Shoreline City Council met on Monday, April 27, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at City Hall. The meeting included a proclamation for Earth Day, approval of the consent calendar, a unanimous vote on Ordinance No. 1059 prohibiting civil immigration enforcement on city property, and a study session on the 2025 Climate Action Plan year-in-review. The meeting adjourned at 8:16 p.m. Consent Calendar - Approved draft minutes from the Regular Meetings of March 9, 2026, and March 23, 2026. - Approved Expenses and Payroll as of April 17, 2026, in the amount of $19,901,962.21. - Adopted Ordinance No. 1054, amending the 2025–2026 Final Biennial Budget. - All items were approved unanimously (7–0). Public Comments & Testimony - Jonelle Kemmerling (Shoreline) expressed concern about vandalism at Saltwater Park due to gates not being locked during police staffing shortages. She noted that residents offered to help lock/unlock gates but were declined, and asked the City to consider alternatives (e.g., hiring a security guard, installing remote locks, or reinstating a caretaker). She described recent damage including graffiti and a fire set in the restroom. - Norbert Steele (Shoreline) spoke about lack of public trust in government institutions. He expressed support for Ordinance No. 1059 (prohibiting civil immigration enforcement on city property) but questioned how it will be enforced given statements from the King County Sheriff’s union. He also asked when the City will hold KCSO accountable for staffing shortages and criticized the retail theft program, suggesting it may lead to felony charges for minor offenses. - Lance Young (Shoreline) urged adoption of a practice similar to Kenmore’s, which provides neighborhood-specific notice of exceptional tree removals. He also noted that trees enhance natural red light exposure, which he linked to health benefits. - Laethan Wene (Shoreline) stated he serves on the Banchero Disabilities Partners advisory council and invited Councilmembers to attend an upcoming meeting. Discussion Items Action on Ordinance No. 1059 – Prohibiting Civil Immigration Enforcement on City Property Deputy City Manager John Norris presented the staff report. Ordinance No. 1059 adds Chapter 9.40 to the Shoreline Municipal Code, prohibiting the use of city-owned or city-controlled property for civil immigration enforcement activities (staging, processing, detention) unless authorized by a court order or judicial warrant. The prohibition does not apply to the public right-of-way. Staff identified 46 locations for signage to communicate the prohibition. Council discussed the ordinance on April 6 and expressed general support. Councilmember Annette Ademasu spoke in favor, emphasizing constitutional protections and humane treatment. The motion to adopt the ordinance (moved by Councilmember Keith Scully, seconded by Councilmember Christopher Roberts) passed unanimously (7–0). Discussion of the Climate Action Plan 2025 Year in Review Paige Scheid, Environmental Sustainability Program Manager, and Sarah Bruemmer, Environmental Sustainability Coordinator, presented the annual report. Key highlights: - The Climate Action Plan (adopted December 2022) aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 60% by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050. - Transportation is the largest emissions source (61% of community-wide emissions), followed by natural gas in buildings (22%). - Overall, emissions have declined 6% since 2019, with significant work remaining to reach the 60% goal. - In 2025, the Pedal Forward Shoreline program provided 125 e-bikes to low-income residents; 80% of recipients reduced car trips by at least one day per week. - The Energize Shoreline program helped 61 households install heat pumps (up from 13 in 2024), with average discounts of $3,800; 16 income-qualified households received fully subsidized installations. - In zero waste, pilot events reused 4,500 single-use items; free compost service was brought to 10 multifamily properties (nearly 1,000 units). - The City has started or completed 66 of 90 actions (73% of the plan). Council discussion covered e-bike usage follow-up, fleet electrification, natural gas trends, tree planting (115 community trees in 2025), the “Soak It Up” program, the need for additional resources for solar incentives, and challenges with waste diversion rates. Councilmember Mork noted the diversion rate has not improved, and staff cited public confusion about recycling. Councilmember Snider raised concerns about managing 240 acres of park and open space by 2030 (only 42 acres, 18%, completed). Staff confirmed they continue monitoring all targets even after initial goals are met. Key Outcomes - Consent Calendar approved unanimously (7–0). - Ordinance No. 1059 adopted unanimously (7–0). Staff will proceed with fabricating and installing signage at 46 city properties. - The Climate Action Plan 2025 Year in Review was discussed; no vote was taken. Council directed staff to provide follow-up information on the e-bike program, fleet electrification plans, tree code updates, and expanding the “Soak It Up” program. The City will relaunch the e-bike rebate program citywide in June 2026 with $125,000 in grant funding.