Public Meetings - Toledo, Ohio

The Lucas County Investment Advisory Committee (IAC) held its first quarter meeting on May 22, 2026. The meeting included approval of prior minutes, public testimony on Israel bonds, discussion of a recent Ohio Attorney General opinion, and a proposed resolution to align committee guidance with that opinion. A motion to table the resolution failed, and an amendment was introduced but not voted on by the transcript's end. Consent Calendar - The meeting minutes from the fourth quarter 2025 meeting were approved unanimously by voice vote. Public Comments & Testimony Five speakers were randomly selected from applicants addressing the topic of Israel bonds. Each was allotted three minutes. - Patrick E. (NWO DSA) opposed investing in Israeli bonds, citing the bombing of civilians and urging Lucas County to invest locally instead. - Sella Carter called the $5 million investment in Israel bonds a "grave failure" and a "huge mistake," highlighting local needs such as housing, groceries, and gas prices. She urged the committee to let the bond mature in December. - Nora Riggs urged non-reinvestment of the $5 million Israel bond maturing in December, linking the investment to support for genocide and citing credit rating downgrades. She argued the funds could build affordable housing in Lucas County and referenced a prior email exchange with Treasurer Webb. - Michael Stram, a Jewish Toledo resident, stated that reinvesting in Israel bonds supports genocide and ethnic cleansing. He argued that the AG's opinion is non-binding and that fiduciary duty must consider financial risks, including credit volatility. He urged the committee to stand with the community. - Brianna Fangman requested that the $5 million not be reinvested, proposing local alternatives such as collateralized CDs or the state treasury asset reserve. She cited Summit County as an example of allowing Israel bonds to mature without reinvestment. Discussion Items - Attorney General's Opinion (2026-004): County Prosecutor John Burrell summarized the opinion, noting it largely restates long-standing Ohio law requiring investments based on safety, liquidity, and yield. He disagreed with the opinion's suggestion that non-reinvestment could constitute a boycott under ORC 9.76, stating that statute applies only to state agencies. Commissioner Gergen criticized the context of the opinion, citing Attorney General Yost's record and the political origins of related statutes. Commissioner Lopez asked for definitions of safety and whether the treasurer had conducted recent analyses. Treasurer Webb confirmed ongoing evaluations based on statutory factors. - Proposed Resolution 2026-001: The resolution aimed to update IAC guidance to reflect the AG opinion. Commissioner Gergen moved to table, arguing the resolution was unnecessary and redundant and had not been discussed by the full committee. After debate over Robert's Rules of Order, the motion to table failed 2-3 (Gergen and Lopez voted yes; Sebecki, Quilter, and Webb voted no). Commissioner Quilter then introduced amendments to replace "guidance" with "policy and advice," remove mandatory reinvestment language, and clarify case-by-case evaluations. The transcript ends before a vote on the amended resolution. Key Outcomes - Minutes approved from the prior meeting. - Motion to table Resolution 2026-001 denied (2-3). - Resolution debate ongoing with amendments proposed; no final decision reached in the provided transcript.

The Transportation Committee of the Toledo City Council met on May 21, 2026, at 2:00 PM to discuss Ordinance 193-26, which would enact a $5.00 annual license fee on motor vehicle plates to fund road and highway reconstruction, maintenance, and repair. The committee received a presentation from city administration, heard one public comment, and voted to relieve the ordinance from committee for a full council vote on May 26, 2026. Presentation by Administration - Megan Robeson (Chief of Operations), Melanie Campbell (Director of Finance), and Jeremy McLizac (Deputy Director of Public Works) presented the proposed fee. Under Ohio Revised Code, municipalities can add a $5 fee per vehicle registration within their taxing district, with revenue restricted to planning, construction, maintenance, and repair of public roads, highways, streets, and bridges. Revenue would be deposited into the Street Construction, Maintenance, and Repair (SCMR) fund. - Based on Ohio BMV data, approximately 220,000 registered license plates in Toledo's taxing district would generate an estimated $1.1 million annually—equivalent to the city's existing patch and seal program. Examples of past patch and seal work include Airport Highway, Grantley Avenue, and Eastbrook. - The city currently enacts only one of the available permissive tax levies; Toledo cannot enact three levies due to county-level levies. Many surrounding municipalities (e.g., Springfield, Sylvania, Ottawa Hills, Maumee, Waterville, Bowling Green) have already enacted or are in the process of enacting the fee. - Director Campbell provided an overview of the SCMR fund: 2026 budget shows $17.3 million in total revenues (including $12.2 million from gasoline taxes and $4.6 million from existing license taxes) and $19.2 million in total expenditures, resulting in a structural deficit of $1.9 million. The fund supports 52 positions in road and bridge maintenance and 36 in traffic management. Projections show that without the additional $1.1 million, the fund balance would become negative by the end of 2028, requiring cuts to personnel and the patch and seal program. Council Discussion - Councilmember Driscoll asked about the consistency of the patch and seal program; administration confirmed it has existed for three years with modifications this year (focusing on larger patches and crack sealing rather than seal coating). - Councilmember raised concerns about the financial strain on residents, noting that $5 can be a significant burden for some, and asked whether the fee could be shifted to commercial trucks that cause more road damage. Administration responded that current state law only allows the $5 fee for all vehicles but would explore legal options with the law department. - Councilmember Sarantou noted that Columbus, Cincinnati, and Cleveland already have higher fees ($30, $30, and $25 respectively). He clarified that the fee would take effect January 1, 2027, if passed by July 1, 2026. He emphasized that revenue is strictly restricted to street maintenance (not police, fire, or parks) and that misappropriation would be a felony. He also stressed that preventive maintenance (patch and seal, pothole repair) saves much more in future road reconstruction costs. The quarter-percent road tax voters approved is only for residential streets and cannot be used for maintenance. - Chair Driscoll noted that emergency passage is not allowed; a 30-day window after passage means the council must vote by May 26 to enact the fee for 2027. He moved to relieve the ordinance from committee, which was approved without objection. Public Comments & Testimony - Glenn Ryan (33072 Carradden Avenue) asked about the city's contingency plan if the federal gas tax is rescinded, given potential impacts on state and federal revenue for projects like I-475 widening. He expressed concern that Ohio's flat tax could reduce state revenue by $1.2 billion and that federal legislators may not act. The committee acknowledged the question but did not provide a detailed response. Key Outcomes - The committee voted to relieve Ordinance 193-26 from the Transportation Committee without objection. - The ordinance is scheduled for a final vote by full City Council on May 26, 2026. If passed, the $5 fee will take effect January 1, 2027. - No public opposition was voiced during the meeting; no vote tally was recorded on the ordinance itself.

The committee met on May 21, 2026, to review a domestic violence prosecution report, debate the proposed privatization of the police impound lot, and discuss gun violence awareness initiatives. Council members heard presentations, public testimony, and deferred action on the impound lot pending further information. Domestic Violence Prosecution Report - The Toledo Prosecutor's Office presented data showing that domestic violence (DV) cases represent roughly 18% of the city's total criminal caseload, making DV the most charged offense in 2024. With funding from city council for three full-time DV prosecutors and a dedicated clerk, the unit has increased convictions and enhanced convictions (making future offenses felonies), resolved cases faster, and spent more time with victims. The prosecutors emphasized that they do not rely solely on victim testimony and instead use other evidence such as 911 calls and body camera footage. - Council members praised the work and asked about relationships with the Toledo Police Department (TPD) and the Children Services Board. The prosecutor noted good collaboration with TPD but expressed a need for more DV detectives at the misdemeanor level. Impound Lot Privatization Discussion - TPD Deputy Chief Braun, Lieutenant Holmes, and VMS COO Frank Mecklenburg presented a proposal to outsource management of the city's impound lot to VMS. The company would pay the city a flat fee (starting at $2.196M annually, rising to $2.471M in year five) and retain all revenue from auction sales and fees. VMS claimed their online auction platform and national buyer network could increase average sale prices from $725 to $950–$975. - Council members expressed concerns about giving up a revenue‑generating asset, the marginal projected net benefit, union implications, and the impact on local businesses. Public testimony included: - Patrick McKinney (U‑Pull Parts) said his company is a local salvage contractor and would be interested in bidding on the full contract if it were opened up. - Pamela Rose (Pamela Rose Auction Co.) stated her firm has generated $3.4M for the city over five years through in‑person and online auctions, and argued that VMS's revenue projections were unsubstantiated. She emphasized that Ohio law requires auctioneers to be licensed and bonded. - A union representative (Mr. Rides) raised questions about how the contract would affect officers currently assigned to the lot, how fees would be controlled, and how warrants, contraband, and evidence would be handled. He also noted discrepancies in the financial projections. - Shannon Cameron (Toledo Lock and Key) warned that private staff might not be equipped to handle dangerous contraband (e.g., weapons, drugs) and that chain‑of‑evidence issues could arise. - Council members requested referral information on contract termination terms, union labor agreements, fee control, and more detailed revenue projections. No vote was taken. Gun Violence Awareness and Prevention - Councilwoman Kramer introduced Aviance Hill and Janelle Echter, co‑founders of Sisters for Unity and leaders of Northwest Ohio Parents of Murdered Children. They shared personal stories of losing children to gun violence and described their work providing grief support, survivor baskets, biohazard cleaning, a hope line, and wellness retreats. They called for survivor‑informed policy and continued investment in community‑based support. - Lucas Camuso Stahl (Toledo Lucas County Public Library) reported that since the launch of a free gun‑lock distribution program one month earlier, 466 locks had been distributed across all library branches. Locations ranged from urban (Lagrange: 22) to suburban (Sylvania: 82). - Councilwoman Kramer outlined upcoming June events for Gun Violence Awareness Month: a name‑reading on June 5, a council proclamation on June 9, an unwanted firearms disposal event on June 13, and a gun violence prevention panel. She also noted the gun locks are provided free by the VA Ann Arbor healthcare system. Key Outcomes - No formal votes were taken on the impound lot contract; referrals were issued to obtain further details on contract termination, labor agreements, fee control, and welfare‑check data (requested by public commenter Richard Arnold). - Council expressed appreciation for the domestic violence unit’s progress and committed to supporting gun violence prevention events and survivor‑led programs.

The Sustainability & Beautification Committee of the City of Toledo met on Wednesday, May 20, 2026 at 2:00 PM in City Council Chambers to discuss the proposed five-year curbside refuse and recycling contract with Republic Services, including technology enhancements, service level agreements (SLAs), bulk collection policies, and associated fee increases. The meeting also previewed upcoming legislation on bulk set out enforcement. Present were Chair Nick Komives, Vice Chair Brittany Jones, Mac Driscoll, Erin Kramer, and members Morris, Gaddis, and President Williams; Cerssandra McPherson was absent. Public Comments & Testimony - Deanna Schreiner (Bancroft Hills resident) expressed concern over eviction-related bulk set outs, stating that landlords often leave furniture and bags that are then slashed by scrappers, creating messes. She advocated for requiring landlords to use dumpsters for cleanouts to reduce blight. - Fanny Effler (2830 Collingwood Boulevard, Old Town neighborhood) praised Republic's service and attendance at neighborhood meetings, but strongly opposed the proposed refuse fee increase of approximately 60% (from $11.50 to $18.50 per month for non-homestead households). She urged the city to collect delinquent water and tax bills before raising fees. - Janice Flayff (Point Place resident) thanked council for including performance-based renewal provisions but argued the annual increases were too high for average Toledoans, requesting reductions in non-essential budget items. - Mark Schmiehausen criticized lack of enforcement of existing city regulations regarding bulk set outs, particularly against landlords. He called for creation of an ad hoc committee with block watch representatives, city, Republic, and the Teamsters to monitor contract performance. Discussion Items - Technology & Communication Enhancements: Republic Services presented new camera and real-time tracking technology that will allow the city to monitor truck locations and service completion via a shared portal. Residents can use the existing "Track My Truck" feature, but the new system provides live data. Councilmembers asked about data retention (at least one year), compatibility with the city's Ptolemy system, and whether the technology improves the customer experience. The administration noted it would help Engage Toledo respond faster. - Customer Service & Dedicated Agents: Republic committed to two specialized customer service agents dedicated to Toledo, a customer retention supervisor, and a logistics analyst. Councilmembers questioned whether two agents were sufficient and how call volume was estimated (noted that bulk call volumes dropped after the January switch to weekly five-item bulk). - Bulk Collection Policy: Under the proposed contract, bulk collection will continue as weekly on the same day as trash, with a limit of five items. The city aims to encourage rental of small dumpsters for larger cleanouts and to extend landfill life. Councilmembers expressed concerns about evictions, emergencies (tornado, flooding), and residents lacking transportation to disposal sites. Councilmember Meldon suggested a hybrid model with quarterly call-ahead bulk. Councilmember Gaddis stressed the need for an emergency plan. The administration acknowledged these concerns and said unique situations can be addressed separately. - Service Level Agreements (SLAs): The city and Republic have aligned on eight SLA categories (e.g., monthly service completion rate, response time, spill cleanup) but specific targets (percentages, hours) are not yet set. Councilmembers demanded clarity, enforcement mechanisms, and financial penalties for non-compliance. Chief Robson indicated the administration will provide proposed percentages and seek council input. Councilmember Meldon advocated for rebate checks to residents if penalties are collected. - Fuel Surcharge: The contract includes a fuel adjustment based on a lagging national average (U.S. Department of Energy). Councilmembers questioned whether Republic's actual fuel costs match the index and suggested using a local Toledo MSA index. The administration noted the formula is industry standard and involves both upside and downside risk. - Refuse Fee Increase: The municipal solid waste fee, last raised in 2016, is proposed to increase to $18.50/month for non-homestead (up from $11.50) in 2026, rising to $21.50 by 2028. Homestead exempted would go from $6.50 to $10.50. The administration compared fees to cities like Lima ($24.86), Detroit ($21.67), and Fort Wayne ($20.32), stating Toledo would remain competitive. - Councilmember Positions: Council President Williams, initially opposed to Republic, expressed grudging support after negotiations, citing $6 million savings over the priority contract and inclusion of KPIs. Councilmember Jones urged public monthly reporting to her Public Health Committee. Councilmember Morris and Serantu stressed the need for defined penalties and enforcement. Councilmember Kramer requested council input on SLA numbers. Key Outcomes - No vote was taken; the committee scheduled a vote on the contract and refuse fee increase for the upcoming Tuesday (May 26, 2026). - Direction to Administration: Finalize service level agreement targets with council input before the contract is signed. The contract will be for five years with five one-year renewal options, beginning September 1, 2026. - Ad Hoc Committee: Councilmember Komives expressed support for a quarterly ad hoc committee with stakeholders to monitor contract performance, echoing public testimony. - Next Steps: The meeting adjourned at 4:00 PM with plans for a follow-up hearing on bulk set out enforcement legislation.

The City of Toledo Zoning & Planning Committee met on May 20, 2026, at 4:00 PM in City Council Chambers. The committee heard seven active zoning and planning items, deferred four items to a future meeting, and reviewed ongoing studies. A fraud warning was issued regarding phishing emails. Most items were recommended for approval to full city council, while two items were sent without recommendation due to public opposition. Public Comments & Testimony - Case 6 – Water Towers (1910 Northover Rd.): Resident Laura Crawford spoke against the project, citing concerns about location in a residential neighborhood (eyesore, contamination, vandalism, property values, noise), and questioned why construction began before final approval. She presented a petition and asked the council to consider an alternative site. Councilmember Driscoll acknowledged constituent opposition. - Case 7 – Standalone Solar Field (627 Lotus Ave.): Multiple residents testified: - Penny Noyes (neighbor) opposed, arguing panels would block river views, harm migratory birds due to glare and disorientation, and disrupt wildlife. She listed bird species observed. - Sue Terrell (Friends of the Maumee River) requested referral to committee until a community benefit agreement is signed, citing lack of transparency and the 2017 master plan’s designation of the site as future greenspace. - Steve Seaton (Broadway Corridor Coalition) supported the project, calling it a win-win that does not preclude future park development and provides needed revenue for the Old South End. - Tonda Kazicki opposed, questioning environmental review, the lack of a binding revenue contract, and urging preservation of riverfront. She also raised concerns about transparency and the grant’s origin. - Timothy Fields (BSN Community) supported, highlighting long-term sustainability and reinvestment in the community. - Kathleen Brushnahan Durr supported the concept but opposed the location, requesting more dialogue and a pause. Discussion Items - Fraud Warning: Director Catrell alerted applicants about fraudulent emails requesting additional fees; advised not to click links and to call the city. - Case 1 – Gas Station Expansion (4486 Monroe St., SUP25-0048): Applicant requested removal of condition 14 (sign compliance) but councilmember Melden declined, citing the sign code system. He recommended approval as recommended by Plan Commission (19 conditions, 2 waivers). No public comment. Motion passed; item to full council June 9. - Case 2 – Zone Change to RD6 (4927 N. Summit St., Z25-0028): Applicant Calvin Mulligan requested change from CR to RD6 for residential use. No public comment. District member recommended approval. Sent to full council June 9. - Case 3 – School (3300 Glendale Ave., SUP26-0010): Originally deferred, but councilmember Hobbs requested it be heard. Applicant had no objections at Plan Commission. District member recommended approval. Sent to full council June 9. - Case 4 – Scrap & Salvage Facility (5400 N. Detroit Ave., SUP26-0006): Applicant agreed to 27 conditions and 1 waiver. Condition 18 updated regarding curb cuts. No public comment. District member recommended approval, asking the operator to be a good neighbor. Sent to full council June 9. - Case 5 – Community Recreation (617 City Park Ave., SUP26-0014): Joe Fosna described a revitalization project at Savage Park including new splash pad, parking, pathways, shelter, and playground. No public comment. Council President Williams recommended approval. Sent to full council June 9. - Case 6 – Water Towers (1910 Northover Rd., SUP26-0002): Applicant presented for two elevated tanks. Councilmember Martinez highlighted OEPA requirements and improved water pressure. Councilmember Driscoll, citing constituent opposition, sent the item to full council without recommendation. Public testimony was heard. - Case 7 – Standalone Solar Field (627 Lotus Ave., SUP26-0003): Applicant Carl Wagner (Historic South Initiative) described a 15‑acre solar array funded by a $1.5M HUD grant. Revenue (estimated $100,000/year for 25 years) would fund neighborhood improvements. Plan Commission voted 5‑0 for approval. After public testimony, councilmember Gaddis moved to send to full council without recommendation due to neighbor concerns. Motion passed. - Case 12 – Zone Change to CO (2108 Collingwood Blvd., Z26-0005): Christine Palmer (Collingwood Presbyterian Church) requested change to CO to allow an exterior sign for their adaptive‑reuse building. Supported by Old West End Historic Commission. No public comment. Council President Williams recommended approval. Sent to full council June 9. - Items 13 & 14 – Studies and Moratorium: Director Catrell reported selection of a consultant for the zoning code rewrite and noted the historic preservation moratorium (about five months away). Several zoning code text amendments are expected soon. Key Outcomes - Deferred to June 17, 2026: Cases 8 (gasoline sales SUP), 9 (PUD removal), 10 (zone change), and 11 (landscaping study) were deferred per applicant requests or staff need. - Sent to Full City Council (June 9, 2026) with Recommendation: Cases 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 12. - Sent to Full City Council (June 9, 2026) Without Recommendation: Cases 6 and 7. - Fraud Warning: Director Catrell alerted the public; no action needed.

The Toledo City Council held an Agenda Review meeting on May 19, 2026, to prepare for the May 26, 2026 regular meeting. Council reviewed over 20 agenda items, including new legislation, second-reading items, and items likely to be relieved from committees. Key discussions centered on a proposed moratorium on new gas stations, the award of a spent lime removal contract, and a $5.5 million grant for a railroad grade separation project in Point Place. Several items received recommendations for placement on the agenda, while others were held pending additional information. Consent Calendar - Resolutions recognizing the 2025-2026 ACES foreign exchange students (R-205-26) and 58th Annual Debutante Cotillion recipients (R-206-26) were presented for approval. - Ordinance O-180-26 repealing a prior ordinance and authorizing $25,000 for street furnishings in the Warehouse District (District 4) was approved. - Ordinance O-210-26 amending the account code for a $80,000 Friendship Park basketball court renovation (District 6 DIP) was approved. - Ordinance O-211-26 amending the account code for a $175,000 pickleball court installation at Fort Meigs Sertoma Park (District 6 DIP) was approved. - Ordinance O-212-26 amending the account code for $77,440 for speed feedback signage in District 1 DIP was approved. - Street renaming resolutions for Searles Road (Dr. Crystal Ellis), Wilmot Street (Kei’Mani Latigue), and Junction/Indiana (Lee & Vernon Liddell) were recommended for approval after Board of Honor review. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were made during the meeting. Discussion Items Spent Lime Contract (O-185-26) Councilman Martinez expressed concerns about the current vendor (Consol) and proposed amending the contract to award it to the second lowest bidder (approximately 40-55 cents per ton difference) with a one-year term to allow for scaling and improved oversight. He noted that the debarment language is weak and that referrals to the administration are pending. Councilman Sarantou requested a status update on Consol's cleanup and emphasized the need for written responses before voting. Council President Williams urged moving forward but acknowledged the need for referral answers. Martinez plans to share the amendment by Friday, May 22. Gas Station Moratorium (O-213-26) Council members Driscoll, Sarantou, and McPherson proposed a moratorium until November 30, 2026, on permits for new gasoline and fuel sales to allow a Plan Commission study on zoning issues, particularly whether gas stations should be allowed in neighborhood commercial districts. Council President Williams strongly opposed, citing a prior moratorium on convenience stores and arguing that it hinders business and deters investment (e.g., Sheets, Buckys). She noted that a local gas station owner had requested the moratorium, raising concerns about stifling competition. Councilmember Gaddis supported the moratorium, highlighting that large gas stations do not fit existing licensing regulations. Councilmember Martinez and Jones expressed being at a crossroads, suggesting that a study might be needed but questioning the necessity of a moratorium. Councilman Driscoll clarified that the legislation was drafted before the letter from the business owner and suggested a shorter three- to four-month moratorium. The item was referred to the Zoning and Planning Committee for further discussion. Point Place Railroad Grade Separation Grant (O-222-26) Simon Nyi, Commissioner of Government Affairs, presented a $5.5 million grant from the Ohio Rail Development Commission for design and engineering of an overpass at either Manhattan or Summit Street in Point Place. The project aims to address frequent train blockages that impede emergency responders and daily traffic. No city match is required. Council members expressed strong support, noting the long-standing need. The project timeline is approximately 10 years or more due to coordination with CSX and FirstEnergy. SCP was approved. Community Gardens Water Infrastructure (O-218-26) The ordinance authorizes $50,000 from the Water Infrastructure Development Fund to install water infrastructure at up to $5,000 per garden location. Councilwoman Jones and Councilman Martinez discussed the need to distinguish between community gardens and urban agriculture, and requested metrics on water usage, follow-up on existing gardens, and a breakdown by district. The item received SCP approval with referrals for additional information. Family House Merger Funding (O-224-26) The administration requested $145,899 from the General Fund to complete the second half of funding for the merger between Leading Families Home and Family House. The first half was disbursed in 2025. Councilman Driscoll expressed support but questioned why the expenditure was not in the 2026 budget, submitting a referral to the finance department. The item received SCP approval. Tow Lot Management Agreement (O-197-26) Councilman Sarantou noted that referrals on this issue are still pending and requested answers before voting. Councilwoman Morris provided contact information for the current contractor, Patrick McKinney, who will attend the Safety Committee meeting on May 21. Other Items - Clean Toledo Recycling Events (O-214-26): $26,000 authorized for collection, hauling, and processing of e-waste at three events. - Keep Toledo Lucas County Beautiful Contribution (O-215-26): $75,000 annual contribution for neighborhood cleanups and recycling programs. - Maintenance Hole Repair (O-216-26): $99,000 for repair of MH 31234 near Sherwood and South Detroit, damaged during a 2025 overflow. - Ohio Utilities Protection Service Membership (O-217-26): $40,000 annual fee ($20,000 each from sewer and water funds). - Raw Water Main Real Estate Acquisition (O-219-26 and O-220-26): $183,806 reappropriation from bond funds and $873,605 from water replacement fund for easements and property purchases. - Source Water Protective Strategies Grant (O-221-26): $4,841 additional grant funds for educational materials with Ohio State University. - Lake Erie West TIP Applications (R-223-26): Authorizing applications for future roadway projects (80% federal, 20% local). - Customer Assistance Grant Program (O-60-26): $100,000 for utility customer assistance, relieved from Water Quality Committee. - HUD Grants (O-200-26, O-202-26, O-203-26): Acceptance of ESG ($619,354), HOME ($1,971,147 plus $5,759,943 carryover), and CDBG ($7,026,026 plus $985,000 carryover) funds for 2026-2027, relieved from Housing Committee. Key Outcomes - Most items received recommendation for placement on the May 26 agenda (SCP). Notable exceptions: O-185-26 (spent lime) was held pending amendment and referrals; O-197-26 (tow lot) was held pending referral responses; O-213-26 (gas station moratorium) was referred to the Zoning and Planning Committee. - Councilman Martinez will present an amendment to O-185-26 by Friday, May 22. - Referrals were made for: spent lime cleanup status, tow lot referral answers, community gardens metrics, and Family House budget inquiry. - The Railroad Grade Separation grant and other utility items were approved for agenda placement. - The meeting adjourned at approximately 2:30 PM.

The Toledo Board of Zoning Appeals met on May 18, 2026, to hear four variance requests and to approve minutes from the previous meeting. Board members present included Julie Randall, Here, Craig, and Barbara Pasker (Devon and Chris also present from roll call). The hearing covered residential additions, a garage, a fence, and an environmental habitat project. Discussion Items and Key Outcomes - Case 26-0001: 2509 Edgebrook Drive – Addition Variance The homeowner requested a variance to build a bedroom and bathroom addition on the east side of the house due to medical necessity (arthritis, multiple surgeries, no main-floor facilities). The Plan Commission had recommended disapproval but proposed an alternative location on the west side (rear of home). The homeowner stated the alternative would eliminate backyard space and not work. The board discussed increasing non-conformity with setbacks (25-foot required, 5-foot proposed) and a possible contextual setback. After deliberation, the board voted to approve the variance as requested. Votes: Julie Randall – yes, Here – yes, Craig – yes, Barbara Pasker – not recorded (assumed yes based on approval). - Case 26-0002: 1224 Joyce Lane – Garage Variance The applicant purchased a vacant lot from the Land Bank adjacent to his daughter's home and requested a variance to build a second garage on a double frontage lot. The setback issue was due to an angled road. The board asked brief questions and the applicant clarified the need. The case appeared to be approved without a formal recorded vote, as the board moved to the next case after the applicant thanked them. (No objection or denial noted.) - Case 26-0003: 6165 Whiteford Center – Fence Variance The applicant requested to keep an existing 6-foot metal fence installed in 2020 (originally a wooden fence was approved, but a taller metal fence was erected due to break-ins). The zoning official argued cost is not a valid hardship, the fence is deteriorating, and it does not comply with code (front yard fence height/material restrictions). The board voted to disapprove the variance. Votes: Julie Randall – no, Here – no, Craig – yes, Barbara Pasker – no. - Case 26-0013: Ottawa River – Environmental Shoals Variance The City Parks Division (represented by Joe Fosma and a consultant from Verdantis) requested a variance to allow in-water fill to construct shoals in the Ottawa River near Harry Kessler Park and Pinkley Landing. The project aims to improve fish habitat and water quality on a 4-acre area. The structures would be submerged below ordinary high water mark, with Army Corps permit already received and further approvals pending. The board expressed support, noting it was a good project. No formal vote was recorded, but the board proceeded to approve minutes and adjourn, indicating approval. Consent Calendar - The board approved minutes from the April 2026 meeting without corrections or revisions. Motion moved and seconded. Other Business - A brief mention of a previous driveway expansion case (from last month) was noted as not approved because the applicant did not submit plans as requested.

No agenda, minutes, or transcript were provided for the meeting scheduled on 2026-05-18 at 14:30 UTC. Therefore, no summary of proceedings, discussions, or outcomes can be generated. No public comments, decisions, or other content were recorded in the supplied materials.

The Toledo City Plan Commission held a regularly scheduled meeting on May 14, 2026, at 1 Government Center. The commission considered seven agenda items including zone changes, a street vacation, special use permits, and a preliminary plat. Key decisions included approvals, a deferral, and a tied vote sending a contested gas station proposal to City Council without recommendation. Consent Calendar - Unanimously approved the minutes of the special meeting of April 9, 2026. Scam Alert - Staff warned applicants about fraudulent letters soliciting additional fees. Applicants with pending cases should contact the plan commission before paying any fees. Case Z26-0006: Zone Change at 802 and 806 Nebraska Avenue - Applicant: Corey Savage, owner of Savage Residential Care. - Request: Rezone from CR (Regional Commercial) to RM36 (Multifamily Residential) to allow a men's mental health facility near the ZEP Center. - Staff Recommendation: Approval for three reasons: consistency with Forward Toledo plan, zoning compatibility, and physical suitability. - Public Testimony: None. - Outcome: Approved unanimously. Applicant will appear before City Council on June 17, 2026. Case Z26-0007: Sign Overlay at 2740 West Central Avenue - Applicant: Jim Sutton, representing Westgate Village North and The Village on C Corp. - Request: Rezone from CR to CRSO (Shopping Center Sign Overlay) to allow unified multi-tenant signage for up to 20 tenants. - Staff Recommendation: Approval with a condition that future sign approvals can be handled administratively by the Plan Director or brought back to the commission. - Public Testimony: None. - Outcome: Approved unanimously. Final plan will allow administrative sign approvals. Applicant to go to City Council on June 17. Case V75-26: Vacation of Jefferson Avenue - Applicant: Haley Kennedy. - Request: Vacate a portion of Jefferson Avenue between Water Street and the Maumee River to correct an encroachment by the Jefferson Avenue comfort station. - Staff Recommendation: Approval with seven conditions, subject to maintaining vehicular access to the river. Fire and transportation departments approved revised plans. - Public Testimony: None. A representative from ProMedica called with access concerns but was satisfied that the vacation would not affect parking garage access. - Outcome: Approved unanimously. Will go to City Council on June 17 and then to the Board of Revision. Case SUP 260015: Special Use Permit for Cemetery at 722 East Bancroft Street - Applicant: Justice McNew, representing the mosque at the site (oldest mosque in Ohio). - Request: Special use permit to establish a new cemetery on vacant lots adjacent to the mosque. - Staff Recommendation: Approval with 12 conditions, citing consistency with Forward Toledo plan, reuse of vacant lots, and no objection from the Lucas County Health Department. - Public Testimony: Wanda Love (Warren Sherman community representative) expressed strong opposition, citing environmental and health concerns about burial without embalming and potential groundwater contamination. She noted the community may circulate a petition. She stated the mosque has only occupied the building for under 20 years, not the oldest as claimed. No neighborhood meeting had been held. - Outcome: Commissioner moved to defer for 30 days to allow a neighborhood meeting. Motion passed unanimously. Applicant agreed to work with staff and the community representative to schedule the meeting. Case will return in June. Case S26005: Preliminary Plat for Doorhaven Homes at 3801 Door Street - Applicant: Greg Feller, engineer for the developer. - Request: Approval of a preliminary plat for 32 lots with private roads, similar to the Field Brook development in Springfield Township. - Staff Recommendation: Approval with 27 conditions. Zoning already in place. - Public Testimony: One call in opposition (letter forwarded to commissioners). No oral testimony. - Outcome: Approved unanimously. No further hearings required; final plat to be submitted within three years. Case SUP 26008: Special Use Permit for Gas/Fuel Sales at 5303 West Bancroft Street - Applicant: Kevin Brown and Hassan Hamami (owner of 23 stations in Michigan). - Request: Special use permit to reopen a closed gas station (closed 6 years) and convert it to a convenience store with gas. Hours proposed 5:30am to 10pm. - Staff Recommendation: Approval with 40 conditions (later updated to 46 after environmental comments). Conditions include lighting shielding, landscaping, and hours of operation per municipal code. - Public Testimony: John Doty expressed concerns about project stalling and lighting glare. Applicant reassured that the project would be completed quickly (money already invested) and lighting would be downward-directed canopy lights only, no parking lot lights. Applicant wants to start work immediately. - Outcome: Approved unanimously. Will go to City Council on June 17 at 4:00 PM. Case SUP 260012: Special Use Permit for Used Auto Sales at 5057 Lewis Avenue - Applicant: (name not given, but property owner). - Request: Special use permit for used auto sales with indoor showroom and outdoor display. - Staff Recommendation: Approval with 18 conditions (later noted 38 conditions). Issues: insufficient landscaping, pole signs must be removed, outdoor display area must be delineated and meet 50-foot setback from residential. - Discussion: Applicant agreed to address conditions but wanted outdoor sales. Commissioner noted that if approved as is, only indoor sales would be allowed; outdoor sales would require an amended site plan. - Outcome: Deferred to June agenda to allow applicant to submit an updated site plan showing landscaping, sign removal, and outdoor display area. Motion passed unanimously. Case SUP 25036: Special Use Permit for Gas Station (Sheets) at 5305/5321 Monroe Street and 4700 Nantucket Drive - Applicant: Alex Swicki representing Sheets (convenience store/gas station chain). - Request: Special use permit for a new gas station with 24-hour operation, including convenience store and fuel sales. Site plan modifications since previous hearings: no left turn onto Nantucket (right-out only), billboard removal, traffic calming discussions with Sylvania Township. - Staff Recommendation: Approval with 47 conditions. Condition 30 restricts hours to 5:30am–1:00am per code; Sheets requested waiver for 24-hour operation. - Recusal: Commissioner Bell recused due to his firm's business relationship with Sheets. - Public Testimony (extensive): - Opponents: Laura Dreheim cited a new University of Montreal study on childhood cancer risk within 250 meters of gas stations, noting nearby apartment complexes with children. She also submitted a letter from a local gas station owner requesting a moratorium on new stations. Jeff Mason opposed due to LED sign at neighborhood entrance, traffic, and tax depreciation incentives. Amber Corter opposed due to increased traffic and safety concerns, especially during construction detours. Cheryl Bath questioned the legality of prior vote and argued that Nantucket is a residential drive, not a thoroughfare. Ann Cruz opposed, describing her disabled son's vulnerability to traffic. - Proponents: George Simon (property owner) spoke in favor, noting Sheets is a high-quality operator and that all tenant issues were resolved. Henry Giha (landlord's attorney) highlighted site improvements, no alcohol sales, and the buffer green space. He also noted that Sheets operates 24/7 at many nearby locations. - Outcome: Roll call vote on waiver of Condition 30 (24-hour operation): 2-2 (Mominy no, Whittington yes, Rakeoff no, Grossweiler yes) – waiver denied. Then motion to approve the special use permit as submitted: 2-2 (same split) – tie. Chair then moved to send the case to City Council without recommendation; that motion passed 4-0 (all yes). The case will go to City Council on June 17, 2026, with a neutral recommendation. Council may modify or approve. Adjournment - The meeting adjourned. Staff recognized Ms. Rising on her last day with the Plan Commission.