Public Meetings - Clark County, Nevada

The meeting was called to order at 10:00 AM. The board opened the floor for public comments on any agenda item; none were offered. The board then considered a motion to accept an unspecified item. The motion was made and seconded, and no further discussion or public comment was recorded, indicating routine approval. Key Outcomes - Motion to accept (agenda item): Moved by Mr. Lefowitz, seconded by Mr. Smith (after initially correcting from "Mr. Leftovich"). The motion passed without recorded opposition. No further details on the item's content were provided in the transcript.

This public fact-finding review, held at 9:00 AM on March 25, 2026, at 500 S. Grand Central Parkway, Las Vegas, NV, was conducted pursuant to Clark County Ordinance Chapter 2.12 following the Clark County District Attorney's Office preliminary determination that no criminal prosecution of the officers involved in the death of Edward Brooks is appropriate. The review was presided over by Mandy McKeller. Chief Deputy District Attorney Mr. Pesci presented the essential facts, calling Detective Paul Cherrier as the sole witness. Gwen Girling served as the ombudsman representing the public and Mr. Brooks' family, and was given the opportunity to question the witness. No formal determination regarding the manner or cause of death was rendered at the conclusion. Presentation of Evidence - Incident Summary: On March 12, 2024, at approximately 15:16 hours, North Las Vegas Police responded to a 911 call reporting gunshots from apartment 4 at 2215 East Nelson Avenue. The call taker also heard gunshots in the background. - Officers Involved: Officer Kenneth Townsley (badge 2642, 4 years of service) and Officer Kevin Calderon (badge 2840, 2 years of service). Both were in marked patrol vehicles, wearing full uniforms with body worn cameras, and both agreed to be interviewed. - Decedent: Edward Jamar Brooks, 43, Black male, 6'2", 300 lbs, resident of the apartment. He had a criminal history including multiple felony convictions and prior arrests. - Timeline: Officers arrived at 15:18 (Calderon) and 15:21 (Townsley). At 15:27, Brooks exited apartment 4 with a gun in his right hand. Officers gave verbal commands to drop the gun; Brooks ignored them and continued advancing. At 15:27:45, both officers discharged their weapons, striking Brooks seven times. Brooks died at the scene. - Weapons: Officer Townsley fired 6 rounds from a department-issued Glock M4 LE .223 caliber rifle (did not fire his handgun). Officer Calderon fired 2 rounds from a Glock 17 9mm pistol. Brooks was armed with a Bersa Thunder .380 caliber semi-automatic handgun; the magazine was empty but one round was in the chamber. Ballistic testing confirmed that cartridge cases found at the scenes of three deceased females matched Brooks' firearm. - Autopsy & Toxicology: Cause of death: multiple gunshot wounds (six to center torso, one to right side of neck). Toxicology revealed the presence of PCP (phencyclidine) and THC derivatives (marijuana). PCP in low doses can cause agitation, hallucinations, aggressiveness, and increased pulse rate. - Preceding Violence: Prior to the officer-involved shooting, Brooks shot and injured a dog, and shot and killed three females (two in apartment 2 and one in apartment 4). Had he survived, charges would have included three counts of murder with a deadly weapon, assault with a deadly weapon on a protected person, ex-felon in possession of a firearm, burglary, animal abuse, and resisting an officer. - 911 Call and Body Camera Footage: The 911 call and body worn camera videos from both officers were played. The footage shows Brooks walking calmly toward officers with a gun in his right hand, not raising it to a 90-degree angle. Officers can be heard giving commands to drop the gun. Officer Calderon stated he feared Brooks might raise the gun. Officer Townsley described Brooks' demeanor as "calm, plain demeanor" and "weird." Both officers stated they did not watch their body camera footage before giving statements. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public submitted questions or comments during the review. Key Outcomes - No formal determination regarding the manner or cause of death was issued. The review served solely to present the public with essential facts. - The Clark County District Attorney's Office preliminary determination that no criminal prosecution of the officers is appropriate was not challenged or altered during the review. - The ombudsman, Gwen Girling, questioned the detective on several points: the limited information officers had upon arrival (only that shots were fired and a dog possibly shot), the lack of identifying descriptors of the suspect, the officers' ability to take cover, the potential confusion of multiple simultaneous commands, and training regarding individuals who may be hearing-impaired or non-responsive. The detective acknowledged that the officers did not know if Brooks was a victim or suspect, and that his failure to respond to commands was noted. - The record of the proceeding, including a video, is available on the Clark County website.

The Clark County District Attorney’s Office conducted a public fact-finding review on March 19, 2026, in accordance with Clark County Ordinance 2.12, following a preliminary determination that no criminal prosecution of the officers involved in the death of Lazaro Enriquez was appropriate. The hearing was presided over by Ozzy Fumo and featured a detailed presentation by Chief Deputy District Attorney John Giordani, with testimony from Detective Kerry Skinner of the Henderson Police Department. Monique McNeil served as ombudsman, representing the public and the Enriquez family. No formal determination regarding the manner or cause of death was rendered. Presentation of Investigation - Detective Skinner presented findings from the Henderson Police Department’s investigation into the officer-involved shooting that occurred on October 27, 2023, at 2312 North Green Valley Parkway, Henderson, Nevada. The incident was documented under report number 23-21323. - The initial call for service at 2117 hours reported a disturbance involving a male (Lazaro Enriquez, age 26) who had been trespassed from apartment 922, was vandalizing the apartment, cutting himself, and had a history of suicide attempts. Two juveniles, ages 5 and 6, were inside the apartment. - The first responding officer, Danielle Bellinger, encountered Enriquez outside the apartment holding a blade. He immediately advanced aggressively, stating “just shoot me.” Bellinger retreated while giving commands to drop the knife. Additional officers arrived, and Enriquez continued advancing despite commands and the deployment of two tasers by Officers Norton and Tady, which proved ineffective. - Officers James Schulke (5 rounds fired) and Nicole Ciotti (4 rounds fired) discharged their weapons, striking Enriquez. He was pronounced deceased at Sunrise Hospital at 2157 hours. - The investigation reviewed body-worn camera footage, 911 calls, witness interviews, crime scene analysis, and an autopsy. The autopsy revealed 9 entrance wounds and 2 exit wounds, with all projectiles entering from the back or side. The cause of death was gunshot wounds to the head and chest; the manner was homicide. Enriquez had self-inflicted cuts on his forearm but no neck wounds. - Witnesses included Rodney Glenn (the reporting party) and Gabriela Martinez (mother of Enriquez’s children). Glenn reported that Enriquez had previously been suicidal and had expressed a desire for police to shoot him. Martinez confirmed Enriquez’s history of suicide threats and self-harm. - Detective Skinner noted that Enriquez had no prior criminal history but had previous mental health crisis holds, including one in September 2023 where he threatened “suicide by cop.” Ombudsman Questions and Discussion - Ombudsman Monique McNeil questioned Detective Skinner about the officers’ training in crisis intervention, the use of commands and de-escalation, and the availability of less-lethal options. Skinner confirmed that Officer Bellinger was CIT-certified, but noted that multiple officers issued commands simultaneously, which may not align with best practices for mental health crises. Skinner also acknowledged that tasers are not always effective on individuals in crisis or under the influence. - McNeil asked why officers did not aim for non-lethal areas (e.g., legs). Skinner responded that due to the dynamic, rapidly evolving situation, the officers focused on stopping the lethal threat posed by a knife-wielding subject advancing after two failed taser deployments, and that precision shots to limbs are highly difficult under stress. Key Outcomes - The Clark County District Attorney’s Office had preliminarily determined that no criminal prosecution of the involved officers was appropriate. The public fact-finding review served to present the essential facts of the investigation. - No vote or formal determination was made; the hearing concluded with the presentation of evidence and ombudsman questions. The video and transcript of the proceedings are available on the Clark County website.

The Clark County Board of County Commissioners held a zoning meeting on March 18, 2026, at 9:00 AM in the Commission Chambers. The meeting addressed routine consent items, multiple public hearings for development proposals, an appeal, and ordinance introductions. Several items were held to future dates. The meeting included public comments from residents and community advocates. Consent Calendar - Items 4-14 were approved together in a single motion, including zoning, use permits, waivers, design reviews, plan amendments, and development agreements. Item 7 (WS-25-0872) was approved with an added public works condition: no fencing within the site visibility zone. Item 10 (ZC-25-0904) was withdrawn by the applicant. Public Comments & Testimony - Lauren DePrete (spelled D-I-P-R-E-T-E) spoke during the first public comment period, opposing waiver requests to eliminate street landscaping, reduce setbacks, and increase fill heights in the Rural Preservation (RNP) overlay. She argued that the proposed changes would compromise safety for equestrians, reduce climate resilience, and undermine the character of rural neighborhoods. She requested that new construction be limited to single-story to match existing homes. - Al Rojas commented on a planned rally on March 28, expressing concern about potential vandalism, and noted that the county’s camping ordinance has led to some arrests but repeat offenders are released quickly. He urged coordination with the DA and judges. - Margaret Coleman spoke during the second public comment period about personal financial matters, requesting assistance with a trust and career change. No board action was taken. Discussion Items - Item 16 (UC-26-0015 – Pettus Family): Holdover use permits for a vehicle paint/body shop and outdoor storage with multiple waivers. The applicant (Brett Flory of Cross Architects) described plans to update the existing site while retaining fencing and an attached sidewalk. Al Rojas spoke in support due to needed fencing to deter homeless encampments. Approved subject to updated plans. - Items 18-20 (VS-26-0021, UC-26-0020, TM-26-500002 – Galkos, LLC): Related items for vacating right-of-way, outdoor storage/truck parking, and a tentative map. Applicant Lucy Stewart withdrew one use permit and one waiver, revised driveway location to meet public works requirements, and agreed to remove chains and bollards from an existing driveway. Approved as amended. - Item 21 (WS-25-0895 – Reineck): Waivers for a light manufacturing facility. Ken Small (SSA Architecture) noted a support letter from an adjacent property owner. A landscape peninsula was added to address parking lot requirements. Approved. - Item 22 (WS-26-0003 – TCB Enterprises): Waivers for increased parking and reduced departure distance for a Christian Brothers Automotive facility. Applicant agreed to designate east-side parking as employee-only and install no-parking signs on Ullom Drive. Approved with additional conditions. - Item 25 (WS-26-0055 – Daniel Perla Associates): Waivers for a two-lot single-family residential development in RNP overlay. Applicant noted consistency with area development. Approved. - Items 23-24 (WS-26-0033, TM-26-500005 – County of Clark/Aviation): A seven-lot single-family subdivision. Applicant Tony Sless (Pulte Homes) agreed to provide full off-site improvements along Arville Street, minimum 16,000 sq ft lots, single-story homes adjacent to existing single-story, and a 5-foot asphalt walking path along Mardon. Waivers were withdrawn except for a building setback allowed on no more than 50% of lots. Approved with conditions. - Item 26 (WS-26-0060 – County of Clark/Aviation): A four-lot cul-de-sac subdivision. Similar conditions as items 23-24: full off-sites on Arville, rural standards on Eldorado, single-story adjacent, and 16,000 sq ft minimum lots. Approved. - Items 27-28 (WS-26-0061, TM-26-500012 – County of Clark/Aviation): An eight-lot subdivision with waivers for fill height and retaining wall. Applicant agreed to full off-sites on Arville, rural standards on Mardon and Eldorado, and a 5-foot asphalt path. Retaining wall and fill waivers retained for utility and drainage reasons. Approved. - Items 29-32 (PA-25-700057, ZC-25-0883, VS-25-0884, WS-25-0885 – Cactus Bermuda Investments): Plan amendment, zone change, vacation, and design review for a retail center (including an Auto Zone). The zone change was reduced from CG to CN (Neighborhood Commercial) as the proposed uses fit CN. Additional conditions: daytime hours (6 AM – 10 PM), structural engineer review to increase wall heights to 8 feet, and signage limited to monument and building signs. Approved. - Items 33-37 (PA-25-700058, ZC-25-0887, VS-25-0886, WS-25-0888, TM-25-500216 – County of Clark/Aviation): Lennar’s 57-lot subdivision on 9.39 acres. Plan amendment from RN to MN, zone change to RS-3.3, and removal of RNP overlay. Neighbors Bob Glau, Dina Young, Michael Carr, and Brian Barron opposed, citing loss of rural character and insufficient buffer. Applicant agreed to rural standards on Mistral (no street lights, reduced right-of-way width), single-story lots along west and south, and disclosures about rural life. Approved with conditions. - Items 46-47 (ZC-26-0035, WS-26-0036 – Gipsy, LLC): Zone change to CG and waivers for parking lot expansion at an existing restaurant in the “fruit loop.” Applicant noted the expansion will add 24 parking spaces (50 to 74). Commissioner Gibson commended the applicant’s work. Approved. - Item 48 (AC-26-900085): Appeal of denial of reasonable zoning accommodation for 16 chickens (hens) at 5614 Stingaree Circle. Applicants Steven and Nadine Joyner cited therapeutic benefits and large backyard. Property owner Jorge Alarcon supported. Commissioner Segerblom requested a private meeting to learn more about the disability and accommodation. Item held to April 8, 2026. The owner was granted an extension on related code violations pending outcome. - Item 49 (AG-26-900139): Discussion to initiate a master plan amendment for APN 162-36-601-004, where the zoning was permanently changed to residential but the master plan still shows commercial. Direction given to staff to initiate the amendment. Key Outcomes - Consent Items (4-14): Approved unanimously with one added condition for item 7. - Item 16: Approved subject to updated plans. - Items 18-20: Approved as amended (withdrawals and revised driveway). - Item 21: Approved. - Item 22: Approved with extra conditions (employee-only parking, no-parking signs). - Item 25: Approved. - Items 23-24: Approved with conditions (minimum lot size 16,000 sq ft, single-story adjacent, full off-sites, detached sidewalk requirements). - Item 26: Approved with similar conditions. - Items 27-28: Approved with conditions, including retaining wall and fill waivers. - Items 29-32: Approved with zone change reduced to CN, daytime hours, wall height study, and signage limits. - Items 33-37: Approved with conditions (rural standards on Mistral, no street lights, single-story buffer, disclosures). - Items 46-47: Approved. - Item 48: Held to April 8, 2026, for further discussion. - Item 49: Direction given to initiate master plan amendment. - Items 50-55: Ordinances introduced; public hearings set for April 8, 2026. - The board also agreed to add a discussion item for the April 8 meeting on Title 30 updates and to consider requiring rural lifestyle signs in RNP areas to inform prospective buyers, as requested by Commissioner Kirkpatrick. - Commissioner Kirkpatrick also requested a discussion on enhanced enforcement of truck parking regulations in residential neighborhoods.

The Clark County Board of Commissioners held a special meeting on March 17, 2026, at 11:00 AM to receive a report on the Fiscal Year 2027 General Fund budget and direct staff accordingly. Finance Director Jessica Colvin presented a detailed overview of revenue trends, expenditure pressures, and proposed cost containment measures. The board discussed the structural deficit, property tax abatements, unfunded liabilities, and next steps for budget adoption. Consent Calendar - The board unanimously approved the agenda as presented. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were offered during either public comment period. Discussion Items - FY2027 General Fund Budget Presentation: - Jessica Colvin outlined the general fund’s role in supporting regional services for 2.4 million residents and municipal services for over 1 million residents in unincorporated Clark County. Key revenue sources include consolidated tax (C-tax), property taxes, and licenses/permits. - Economic Indicators: - Visitor volume declined 7% year-to-date through January 2026. - Deeds recorded declined 7.1% in FY2026, building permits down 17%, and business license applications down 21.6%. - The building department’s enterprise fund may need to defer capital projects if trends continue. - Property Tax: Assessed valuation growth slowed to 4.3% in FY2026 and a projected 2.2% in FY2027, with one-third of the $3 billion increase from new construction. Depreciation is outpacing appreciation. 85% of parcels are in abatement, costing the county an estimated $260 million annually (and Metro $70 million). - Consolidated Tax: Base distribution shortfalls have totaled over $67 million over four years. FY2026 C-tax came in higher than expected due to a timing issue, but FY2027 projections are flat with Department of Taxation estimates. - Structural Deficit: Operating revenues are projected to be $53 million less than operating expenditures (status quo). To balance, the county will use FY26 estimated savings, reduce fund balances in town funds and the detention fund, and defer capital projects. - Cost Containment Recommendations (no vote taken): 1. Limit new supplemental positions (to be brought back in May). 2. Require justification for filling vacancies in departments with less than 10% vacancy rate (instead of a blanket hiring freeze). 3. Limit discretionary spending (training, travel, community engagement, printing/postage). 4. Defer capital replacements that do not pose health/safety risks. 5. Defer new general fund capital projects; restricted revenue projects can continue. - Unfunded Future Obligations: - $60 million for operations of new capital projects (FY2028-31). - $87 million unfunded workers’ compensation liability. - $56 million unfunded insurance liability (primarily Metro/detention litigation). - $30 million child welfare permanency deficit. - $13 million structural imbalance in sales tax funds (more cops/crime prevention). - Commissioner Discussion: - Commissioner Kirkpatrick emphasized the need for a property tax floor to prevent a repeat of the Great Recession and suggested a broader presentation on property tax reform, possibly inviting Marvin Levitt. She noted the legislature has been unwilling to act for 10 years. - Commissioner Jones highlighted that Henderson may benefit less from abatement changes due to older housing stock. He also requested data on public works fees that have not been adjusted in 10 years. - Commissioner Kirkpatrick asked about litigation costs separate from Metro, noting that the county’s own litigation (e.g., coroner, child welfare) may be understated. The county’s self-funded insurance liability is $56 million, but this is actuarially determined. - Manager Schiller noted the need to align budget updates with legislative session preparation. Key Outcomes - Direction to Staff: - Staff will follow up with individual commissioners on cost containment measures before April 15, 2026. - The tentative budget will be filed by April 15, 2026. - Staff will provide a six-month budget update in November 2026 (or possibly both November and January) rather than waiting until December. - Staff will research a property tax floor, property tax reset at resale, and the impact of abatements. They will also coordinate with government affairs to invite stakeholders for a focused property tax discussion. - Staff will provide a complete analysis of all fees that have not been adjusted, including those in public works. - Staff will investigate the 21.6% decline in business license applications. - Staff will provide data on the cost per officer funded by the sales tax funds (more cops) and work with Metro and the city on a five-year plan for those funds. - Staff will meet with the actuary to confirm assumptions on the unfunded insurance liability. - Final budget hearing is scheduled for May 18, 2026, with final budget filing by June 1, 2026. - No formal votes were taken on the budget or cost containment measures; the board directed staff accordingly.

The March 17, 2026 joint meeting of the Clark County Board of Commissioners, Water Reclamation District Board of Trustees, University Medical Center Board of Hospital Trustees, and Liquor and Gaming Licensing Board considered a broad range of routine and significant matters. Key actions included approving the consent agenda (with one deletion and one item taken separately), authorizing an amendment to the Environmental Impact Statement contract for the Southern Nevada Supplemental Airport, adopting an ordinance to regulate retail hemp sales, and approving a special events parade for Insomniac Holdings. The board also received presentations on habitat conservation measures, conducted several public hearings, and recognized community members and employees. Recognition - The board presented a proclamation honoring Irish American Heritage Month and recognized Beth Mulleny and Killian's Angels for their cultural contributions. - A proclamation was presented to the Grassroot Girls organization for their work empowering young women in civic engagement. - Three Clark County employees were recognized as Value Champions: Carla Benjamin (onboarding), Jennifer Brustel (social services), and Vincent Kelly (excellence). Consent Calendar - The consent agenda (Items 7–49) was approved as amended: Item 7 was deleted, and Item 19 was taken separately. Routine approvals included contracts for marketing, mental health restoration, foster youth transportation, plumbing supplies, and various public works and transportation interlocal agreements. The board also approved the donation of a 0.27-acre parcel to Habitat for Humanity (Item 38), a telecommunications franchise amendment (Item 54), and a resolution to augment the FY 2026 General Fund (Item 53). Public Comments & Testimony - First public comment period: A resident (Rashana) urged the elimination of invocations at meetings, citing separation of church and state. She stated that 70% of Nevada cities and counties do not have invocations. - Item 19 (Airport EIS): Multiple workers from airport subcontractors (Adrian Cosby, Jacob Ramos) testified that they cannot afford basic necessities due to low wages and urged that DBE companies provide livable wages. Brian Ayala, representing nine DBE companies, reported that a negotiation is scheduled for March 25, 2026, and submitted letters to Manager Schiller. - Item 62 (Habitat Conservation Plan): Andrew Powell, planning manager for the City of Henderson, expressed support for the final Avoidance and Minimization Measures (AMMs) and retention of the burrowing owl as a covered species, noting the work group's collaborative effort. - Item 55 (Hemp regulations): Over 20 speakers testified. Supporters included State Senator Lori Rogisch, Nevada Cannabis Association representatives, the Las Vegas Police Protective Association, firefighters union, Nevada Resort Association, and several licensed cannabis businesses. They argued the ordinance protects consumers, levels the playing field, and closes a loophole for intoxicating hemp products. Opponents, including hemp manufacturers and retailers (Patrick Conlaug, Edwin Frymov, Caitlin Caturrier, and others), argued that the ordinance would eliminate non-intoxicating hemp products, cost jobs, and that existing state and federal regulations are sufficient. They requested a delay until federal rules are released in November 2026. A resident (Greg Gollens) shared an anecdote of a friend harmed by untested products. Another resident (Al Rojas) expressed support for strict regulation of intoxicating hemp but noted CBD's potential to reduce opioid use. - Second public comment period: A resident (Rashana) again raised concerns about religious indoctrination and recommended the organization Recovering from Religion. Edwin Frymov argued that the hemp ordinance unfairly targets a federally legal industry to benefit the marijuana industry. Al Rojas praised the board's new encampment ordinance and requested a town hall. Discussion Items - Item 19 – Southern Nevada Supplemental Airport EIS: Staff presented the second amendment to the contract with Landrum & Brown for the Environmental Impact Statement. The board discussed the importance of the project and coordination with RTC and NDOT for transit access. Commissioner Jones emphasized transit as a priority for access to the supplemental airport. The director confirmed that planning for LAS modernization is proceeding with a meeting with airline partners in April and a board update in June. The motion to authorize the director to sign the amendment passed unanimously. - Item 57 – Ordinance to Modify Structural Barrier Requirement (Introduced): The ordinance would allow a written security plan in lieu of a structural barrier separating minors from bar/lounge areas. Introduced with a public hearing set for April 7, 2026. - Item 62 – Habitat Conservation Plan: Avoidance and Minimization Measures (AMMs): Principal Environmental Specialist Kimberly Goodwin presented the work group's consensus on all but one AMM—the burrowing owl clearance surveys. Staff recommended retaining the burrowing owl as a covered species to provide regulatory certainty, avoid potential development halts if the species is federally listed, and because the cost-benefit ratio is favorable. A work group member had proposed removal due to the owl's prevalence and potential delays. After discussion, Commissioner Gibson moved to approve staff's three recommendations, including retaining the burrowing owl. Commissioner Becker initially deferred to hear from industry, but after noting that no additional public comment was offered, the motion passed unanimously. - Public Hearing – Item 50: Latino Liquor Waiver: The applicant sought a waiver of the 1,500-foot distance requirement from a church; the distance was approximately 1,193 feet. A resident (Al Rojas) opposed, citing high homelessness and crime in the area. The applicant responded that the store would provide jobs and that existing stores are far apart. The board approved the waiver, with Commissioner Kirkpatrick moving for approval. - Public Hearing – Item 51: Air Quality Regulations: The board adopted amendments to Section 12.0 and created new Section 131 regulating VOC emissions from emulsified asphalt as a contingency measure for 2015 ozone standards. No public comment. - Public Hearing – Item 52: CDBG Reprogramming: Approved the reprogramming of $900,000 in Community Development Block Grant funds to the Southern Nevada Children’s Advocacy Center for tenant improvements. Unanimous. - Public Hearing – Item 53: General Fund Augmentation: Approved a resolution to augment the FY 2026 General Fund with FY 2025 budgetary savings for capital pay-go funding. Unanimous. - Public Hearing – Item 54: Metronet Franchise Expansion: Approved the first amendment to the telecommunications franchise to expand Metronet's service area into Sunrise Manor. No objections. Commissioner Kirkpatrick requested a meeting to focus on serving far east areas. Unanimous. - Public Hearing – Item 56: Insomniac Special Event Preliminary Approval: Approved the “World Party Parade” on May 14, 2026, from 6 p.m. on Las Vegas Boulevard, with an estimated attendance of 30,000. The parade is free and family-friendly, with floats and a culminating celebration at the Las Vegas Festival Grounds. Metro and Fire departments confirmed safety plans. Commissioner Kirkpatrick highlighted the parade's community benefit and requested continued safety planning. Unanimous. - Public Hearing – Item 55: Hemp Regulations: After extensive public testimony, the board adopted an ordinance adding Chapter 7.220 to Title 7 of the Clark County Code. Amended by staff: deleted subsection F (section 7.220.310) and extended the effective date from 90 to 120 days. Commissioner Kirkpatrick moved approval with an additional amendment to tie the THC limit in subsection B to federal law (0.3% or 0.4 mg per package, as in original) so that future federal changes would automatically apply. Commissioner Segerblom expressed concern about bypassing the 0.4 mg cap but supported moving forward. The motion passed (vote count not specified, but appears unanimous). The ordinance prohibits the sale of hemp-derived food products (like gummies) and intoxicating hemp products outside of licensed cannabis dispensaries, requires testing, age 21+ sales, and work cards. Key Outcomes - Consent Agenda approved (Items 8–49, with Item 7 deleted and Item 19 heard separately). - Item 19 approved unanimously authorizing the second amendment to the SNSA EIS contract. - Item 50 (Latino Liquor waiver) approved unanimously. - Item 51 (Air Quality Regulations) approved unanimously. - Item 52 (CDBG reprogramming) approved unanimously. - Item 53 (General Fund augmentation) approved unanimously. - Item 54 (Metronet franchise expansion) approved unanimously. - Item 56 (Insomniac parade preliminary approval) approved unanimously. - Item 55 (Hemp regulations) approved with amendments: deleted original subsection F, extended implementation to 120 days, and referred to federal THC limits. Provides a 120-day period for stakeholders to propose modifications before effective date. - Item 57 introduced, public hearing set for April 7, 2026. - Item 59 – Daniel Bartlett appointed to Air Pollution Control Hearing Board for a three-year term. - Item 60 – Nancy Dieckmann Matheny appointed to the Community Development Advisory Committee (CDAC) for a two-year term. - Item 61 – Resolution 26-002 approved by the Water Reclamation District Board of Trustees, authorizing up to $196,525,000 in refunding bonds, expecting $10 million in savings. - Item 62 – Final AMMs approved, including retention of the burrowing owl as a covered species. Directs staff to continue developing implementation documents with stakeholders.

The Clark County Planning Commission met on Tuesday, March 17, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. in the Commission Chambers, Clark County Government Center, Las Vegas. The meeting was chaired by Edward Frasier III. The commission approved routine consent items, held one item, and approved the majority of non-routine items, with several forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) for final action on April 22, 2026. Items 30–34 were held to April 21, 2026 per the applicant's request. Consent Calendar - Items 4–7: Approved unanimously (7-0). Included: use permit extension for rock crushing (WERDCO BC), tentative map for commercial lot (Diamante Canyon), use permit and design review for vehicle maintenance (2475 Nellis LV), and vacation of a portion of Paradise Road (Atrium Holdings). Public Comments & Testimony - Items 20–25 (Regional Maryland LLC): Two speakers opposed the proposed 46-unit townhome development. Jani expressed concerns about school enrollment and lack of community resources, noting the Clark County School District's facility master plan. Albert White, a neighboring property owner, argued the density would devalue adjacent properties and that the development lacked adequate recreational space. Discussion Items - Item 8 – Outdoor Storage (Fremont Holdings): Applicant requested outdoor storage with waivers. Commissioner Kilarski requested a revised landscape plan and held the item to April 7, 2026 (7-0). - Items 9–10 – Vehicle Wash and Vacate (Maverik Inc.): Heard together. Approved (7-0) with conditions including additional trees and a decorative block wall to mitigate noise for adjacent residences. - Items 11–15 – Residential Waivers (Various): All approved with conditions. - Item 11 (Gallagher): Approved (7-0) with revised plans and paint condition. - Item 12 (Donatien): Approved (6-1, Mujica dissenting) with one-year completion deadline. - Item 13 (Zeledon): Approved (7-0). - Item 14 (Stanfill): Approved (7-0) with requirement to remove shed B within six months. - Item 15 (Lindquist): Approved (7-0) for chicken coop and shed. - Items 16–19 – Zheng Da LLC (Commercial): Heard together. Plan amendment (16) and zone change (17) approved; zone change reduced to CN (Commercial Neighborhood) (6-1, Kirk dissenting). Vacation (18) approved (7-0). Use permit (19) approved (6-1, Kirk dissenting) with conditions: applicant must work with Public Works and waivers 2 and 3 (landscape reduction) were denied. All forwarded to BCC. - Items 20–25 – Regional Maryland LLC (Residential): Heard together. Plan amendment (20) and zone change (21) approved (7-0). Vacation (22) approved (7-0). Waiver of development standards (23) approved (6-1, Brady dissenting) with condition of no on-street parking. Planned unit development (24) and tentative map (25) approved (5-2, Brady and Kilarski dissenting). All forwarded to BCC. - Items 26–29 – Buffalo Las Vegas Land (Tesla Dealership): Heard together. Plan amendment (26) approved (7-0). Zone change, vacation, and waiver/design review (27–29) approved together (7-0) with staff conditions. All forwarded to BCC. - Items 30–34 – Buffalo Amigos (Residential): Held to April 21, 2026 per applicant's request (7-0). Key Outcomes - Total applications approved: 26 (including consent items). 1 held (item 8). 5 held to April 21 (items 30–34). - Votes: Most items passed 7-0. Notable dissents: Commissioner Kirk on items 17 and 19; Commissioner Brady on items 23, 24, 25; Commissioner Kilarski on items 24 and 25; Commissioner Mujica on item 12. - Next steps: Items 8 will be heard on April 7, 2026. Items 30–34 will be heard on April 21, 2026. Items 16–29 will be forwarded to the BCC meeting on April 22, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. Appeals must be filed by March 25, 2026.

A briefing meeting of the Clark County Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, March 17, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. in the Commission Chambers. Chair Edward Frasier III called the meeting to order. Commissioners present: Edward Frasier III, Leslie Mujica, Tyler Brady, Steve Kirk, Vivian Kilarski, Michael Roitman (joined at 6:06 p.m.), and Nelson Stone. Staff presented an overview of items on the upcoming March 17, 2026 Planning Commission agenda, including holds, routine action items, and non-routine action items. No new ordinances or administrative items were discussed. Public comments were invited but none were made. Discussion Items - Hold Requests: The applicant’s representative requested to hold Items 30–34 (PA 26-7004, ZC 26056, VS 260057, WS 260058, and TM 26-5011) until the April 21, 2026 Planning Commission meeting. The corresponding Board of County Commissioners meeting date will change from April 22, 2026 to May 20, 2026. - Routine Action Items (Items 4–7): - Item 4 (ET26404/UC230862): First extension of time for a rock crushing facility in the Whitney planning area. The Whitney Town Advisory Board recommended denial due to concerns about outdated traffic study and parking/traffic issues. Two neighbors opposed. Staff noted that first extensions typically receive staff recommendation of approval. Commissioner Kilarski asked about land use changes; staff replied there were no significant changes. - Item 5 (TM265020): Tentative map for one commercial lot on 2.12 acres in H2 zoning. Enterprise Town Advisory Board recommended approval. - Item 6 (UC26007): Use permit for vehicle maintenance and repair with design review in an existing shopping center, Sunrise Manor. Town Advisory Board and staff recommend approval; two cards in support received. - Item 7 (VS260031): Vacation of a portion of right-of-way on Paradise Road between Flamingo Road and Harmon Avenue, Paradise. Paradise Town Advisory Board and staff recommend approval; one card in protest received. - Non-Routine Action Items (Items 8–34): - Item 8 (UC26049): Use permit for outdoor storage with waivers (reduced buffering/screening, eliminate street landscaping) east of Fremont Street, Sunrise Manor. Sunrise Manor Town Advisory Board recommended denial, citing incompatibility and concerns about trash enclosure and vagrancy. Staff concerned about proximity to residential and manufactured home park. - Items 9–10 (ES260066/UC260065): Companion items: vacation of easements and use permit for a vehicle wash facility south of Blue Diamond Road, Enterprise. Enterprise Town Advisory Board recommended denial. Staff received 3 cards and 1 letter in support, 21 cards and 2 letters in protest. Two neighbors opposed citing existing vehicle washes and noise concerns. Staff concerned about impact on existing single-family residential to the south. - Item 11 (WS260029): Holdover waiver for accessory structures (reduced buffering/separation) in Winchester. Winchester Town Advisory Board recommended approval. Staff received 4 cards in support, 3 in protest. Active code enforcement violation for building without permit. - Item 12 (WS260030): Holdover waiver to reduce rear setback for an accessory dwelling unit in Paradise. Paradise Town Advisory Board recommended approval. Staff received 1 card and 3 letters in support. Active code enforcement violation. - Item 13 (WS260034): Waiver for carport setbacks in Winchester. Winchester Town Advisory Board recommended approval. Staff received 8 cards in support, 5 in protest. Permit not issued for detached patio cover. - Item 14 (WS2640): Waiver for sheds in Spring Valley. Spring Valley Town Advisory Board recommended approval. Staff received 6 cards in support, 8 cards and 1 letter in protest. Neighbor opposed due to shed size/height; one board member cited self-imposed hardship. No permit submitted. - Item 15 (WS260064): Waiver for accessory structures in Enterprise. Enterprise Town Advisory Board recommended approval. Staff received 2 cards and 1 letter in support, 2 cards and 1 letter in protest. - Items 16–19 (PA26701, etc.): Companion items: plan amendment, vacation, and use permit for outdoor dining/drinking/cooking with waivers on Decatur Boulevard, Enterprise. Enterprise Town Advisory Board recommended denial. Staff concerned about landscaping and safety issues with driveway geometry. - Items 20–25 (PA26702, ZC26003, etc.): Companion items: plan amendment, zone change (RS20 to RM18), vacation, waivers, PUD, and tentative map for 46 single-family attached residential lots on Cactus Avenue, Enterprise. Enterprise Town Advisory Board recommended approval on plan amendment but expressed concerns about density and single access point. Staff received significant protest cards. Public works staff raised safety concerns about driveway geometry and number of units on private stub street. - Items 26–29 (PA26703, etc.): Companion items: plan amendment, zone change, vacation, and waivers for a vehicle sales facility on Tioga Way, Spring Valley. Spring Valley Town Advisory Board recommended approval but concerned about retaining wall height. Staff recommends approval of waiver standards 1, 2, and 4, and denial of waiver 3. Three cards in protest received. Key Outcomes - The briefing concluded at 6:21 p.m. No votes or decisions were taken. The commission received the staff presentation in preparation for the regular Planning Commission meeting later that evening. The next regular meeting will include the items discussed, with Items 30–34 held to April 21, 2026.

On March 16, 2026, the Clark County Police Fatality Public Fact-Finding Review was held to examine the circumstances surrounding the death of Julian McCoy, who died on June 15, 2024, during an incident with North Las Vegas Police Department (NLVPD) officers. The review was conducted in the Commission Chambers at the Clark County Government Center in downtown Las Vegas, starting at 2:00 p.m.. Hearing Officer Mandy McKellar presided, with Willard Ewing as Ombudsman representing the public and McCoy's family. Chief Deputy District Attorney Tyler Smith presented the facts, and Detective Shane Forsberg (NLVPD) served as the primary witness. The review followed the District Attorney's preliminary determination that no criminal prosecution of the officers was appropriate, as required by Clark County Ordinance Chapter 2.12. The purpose was to present essential facts to the public; no formal determination of the cause or manner of death was rendered. Presentation of Facts Detective Forsberg presented a detailed timeline and evidence: - 6/15/2024, 9:04 p.m.: NLVPD Officer Rios attempted a traffic stop of McCoy's silver Chevrolet Malibu; McCoy failed to yield and drove recklessly, running a red light. - 9:07 p.m.: 911 calls reported a vehicle collision and an armed subject. Multiple callers stated the driver had a rifle and had pointed it at people. - 9:15 p.m.: Officers arrived at the intersection of Craig Road and North Fifth Street. They visually confirmed McCoy was armed with a rifle and waving it inside the vehicle. Verbal commands to drop the weapon were ignored. - 9:24 p.m.: McCoy pointed the rifle out of the passenger window directly at a patrol vehicle where Officer Dolan was using the PA system. Seven NLVPD officers discharged their weapons, striking McCoy multiple times. McCoy was declared deceased at the scene. Key evidence presented: - McCoy's weapon: A loaded .22 caliber lever-action rifle (Browning) containing 15 cartridges. The rifle was functional and had been struck by gunfire, damaging the stock. A live .22 cartridge was found on the passenger seat, indicating a round was chambered. - Officers' weapons: Seven officers fired a total of 92 rounds (67 9mm and 27 .223 caliber). The breakdown: Officer Barnes (12 rifle rounds), Chevalier (7), DeLorco (15), Garcia (25–26, with one discrepancy), Guerin (13), Rigsby (3), Ryan (17). - Autopsy results: Cause of death: multiple gunshot wounds; manner: homicide. 13 intact projectiles were recovered from McCoy's body, plus one additional bullet found during autopsy preparation. Toxicology showed methamphetamine at 3,000 ng/mL (30 times the legal per se limit of 100 ng/mL for driving) and cocaine at 32 ng/mL. - Traffic collision: McCoy was the accident-causing driver, entering the intersection against a red light and striking multiple vehicles. - Witness statements: A civilian witness and a NLV Fire Department paramedic reported that McCoy pointed the rifle at them. Body-worn camera footage from multiple officers was shown, including the moment the rifle barrel extended out the passenger window toward officers. Discussion Items The Ombudsman, Willard Ewing, questioned Detective Forsberg on several points: - Family outreach: A female family member had contacted NLVPD early on but did not leave contact information; no further family involvement occurred. - Officer positioning: Officers closest to the suspect vehicle (south side: Garcia, Rigsby; north side: Ryan, Chevalier, DeLorco) had the best view and fired; officers farther away (Abshire, Lamb, Gutierrez Gonzalez, Pavlenko) did not fire due to lack of clear visual or unfavorable backdrop. - Use of force justification: Officers were trained to fire only when they perceived an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury. The unanimous trigger was McCoy aiming the rifle directly at officers. Several officers reported hearing commands to