Public Meetings - Lehi, Utah

The Lehigh City Council convened on November 18, 2025, with Council Members Chris Paige, Heather, Michelle, Paul Hancock (virtual), and the Mayor in attendance, pending the arrival of Chris who joined later. The meeting began with a prayer led by Paige and a Pledge of Allegiance led by Heather. The session included a closed executive session regarding property litigation, professional competence, and character issues. The Council unanimously approved a series of routine agenda items, including a consent agenda, a water conservation plan amendment, two construction agreements, property acquisition, and zoning changes. The primary deliberation centered on a major resolution to finance a new Science and Technology building at Thanksgiving Point via sales tax revenue bonds, involving extensive debate on financing mechanics, public access guarantees, and risk mitigation. Consent Calendar - Item 3.1: Approved the ordinance for the Clark Meadows annexation. - Item 3.2: Approved the meeting minutes from the prior session. - Item 3.3: Approved the purchase orders. Public Comments & Testimony - Rachel Freeman: Expressed full support for the budget amendment creating a code enforcement position, stating it is a great initiative for the community. - Unnamed Council Member (referencing pedestrian safety): Raised concerns regarding pedestrian traffic on the east side of Center Street near the Sky Area Plan amendment, specifically noting the need for safe access for minors walking to Skyridge High School and potential conflicts with driveway placements. Discussion Items - Resolution 2025-83 (Water Conservation Plan): Greg presented the amendment updating staff, water sources, and rights; the Council noted the requirement for five-year updates. Position: Support expressed for all members to proceed with the update. - Resolution 2025-81 (Jordan Willows Lift Station): Core Construction agreed to refurbish pipes, fittings, valves, and pumps for a 20-year-old lift station handling six million gallons daily. Council members discussed the complexity of the job, with one member expressing they were glad not to work for the contractor due to the difficulty. - Resolution 2025-79 (Foreclosure Purchase): Staff recommended purchasing a vacant reservoir property to address liability from a leak, with plans to resell the property immediately after repairs. Position: Council supported the acquisition to mitigate liability risks. - Resolution 2025-82 (Engineering Services): RB and G Engineering was selected to design the widening of 2300 West. Position: Council expressed confidence in the firm due to their previous excellent work and selection committee recommendation. - Budget Amendment 2025-78 (Code Enforcement): The amendment creates a code enforcement position under the Planning Department working with Police to track violations. A public hearing was held with Rachel Freeman testifying in support. Positions: Council members expressed approval of the position's safety and compliance benefits. - Ordinance 65-2025 (Smith Zone Change): Approved changing 0.4 acres at 235 West State Street from R2 residential to Neighborhood Commercial. The applicant noted the change aligns with the General Plan and follows a unanimous Planning Commission recommendation. Position: Council supported the designation change. - Ordinance 66-2025 (Sky Area Plan): Gardner Company presented design changes for mixed-use development, including drive-throughs set behind buildings with retaining walls and landscaping buffers, and a linear park to enhance pedestrian access. Positions: Council discussed the buffer between the drive-throughs and the sidewalk; staff confirmed the safety design includes a park strip, sidewalk, and retaining walls. Council supported the design amendments. - Resolution 2025-84 (Thanksgiving Point Bond): McKay Christensen (CEO) and Jason Burningham presented a proposal for a $60 million Science and Technology building, with $30 million to be financed by Lehigh City sales tax revenue bonds. Positions: - Support: Council members Chris, Heather, Paul, and Paige supported the motion, citing the significant economic return (over 8% ROI), the reinvestment of interest savings ($6.9 million NPV) into the project rather than banks, the lack of immediate cash outlay, and the public benefit for STEM access for low-income children. - Opposition/Concern: Council Member Michelle expressed strong concern about pledging public tax revenue (sales tax) to a private entity, citing Utah Constitution restrictions. She preferred a conduit bond structure to avoid public risk, arguing the $6.9 million savings would otherwise go to bond investors in that model. She also requested explicit guarantees that low-income access (WIC/SNAP) and public programming would remain identical to current Thanksgiving Point operations. - Amendments: Following Michelle's concerns, the Council agreed to amend the motion to replace specific ticket revenue pledges with a "net revenue pledge" from all Thanksgiving Point facilities as a backstop and to include language ensuring the facility operates under substantially similar public access terms as current Thanksgiving Point venues. - Resolution 2025-80 (Election Certification): Council reviewed and prepared to certify the official results of the November 4, 2025, General Municipal Election. Position: Unanimous approval of the certification process. Key Outcomes - Approved Resolution 2025-83: Amending the Lehigh City Water Conservation Plan (Vote: 5-0). - Approved Resolution 2025-81: Agreements for Jordan Willows Lift Station Upgrade with Core Construction (Vote: 5-0). - Approved Resolution 2025-79: Ratifying the purchase of a foreclosure property for liability mitigation (Vote: 5-0). - Approved Resolution 2025-82: Agreement with RB and G Engineering for 2300 West widening (Vote: 5-0). - Approved Resolution 2025-78: Budget amendment for Fiscal Year 2026 to fund a Code Enforcement Officer (Vote: 5-0). - Approved Ordinance 65-2025: Smith Zone Change at 235 West State Street (Vote: 5-0). - Approved Ordinance 66-2025: Sky Area Plan Amendment for design changes and drive-throughs (Vote: 5-0). - Approved Resolution 2025-84 (with Amendments): Authorizing the issuance of sales tax revenue bonds for the Thanksgiving Point Science and Technology building. The resolution was approved with amendments directing the lease to be modified to replace specific ticket revenue pledges with a net revenue pledge from all facilities and ensuring public programming operates under the same scope as existing venues. (Vote: 4-1). Council Member Michelle voted no due to concerns over pledging taxpayer credit, while the majority viewed the structure as low-risk with high community returns. - Approved Resolution 2025-80: Certification of the November 4, 2025, election results (Vote: 5-0). - Adjournment: Council adjourned to a closed executive session for discussion of personnel, character, and professional competence issues.

The Lehigh City Planning Commission convened on November 13, 2025, to review twelve agenda items, including the Downtown Vitalization Plan, multiple rezoning requests, development agreements, and site plan exceptions. The meeting began with the approval of meeting minutes from October 2 and October 9, with a specific correction to replace the word "swindled" with "misled" regarding a previous discussion. The Commission engaged in detailed deliberations regarding traffic impacts, zoning consistency, pedestrian connectivity, and tree canopy requirements, ultimately approving nearly all items with specific conditions or motions to the City Council. Consent Calendar - Approved the meeting minutes from October 2nd and October 9th, 2025, with the stipulation that the record be amended to reflect that the word "misled" was intended instead of "swindled" as noted by Commissioner Ayer. Public Comments & Testimony - Lyndon Dangerfield (Applicant, Item 3.3): Stated that the proposed flag lot would remain single-family residential; expressed willingness to orient the future home westward to align with neighbors and existing development patterns. - Mike Bailey (Neighbor, Item 3.3): Expressed strong opposition to the subdivision, objecting to any new housing being built in the back of the property. Position included a specific request that any future structure must face west and not north or south to avoid staring into adjacent yards. - Porsche Pro Neighbor (Item 3.3): Requested an impermeable fence (in contrast to the current field fence) to securely contain their horses and protect their property from disturbance. - Keith Hall (Neighbor, Item 3.3): Expressed a desire for the applicant to assist with the cost of a new fence (estimated $15,000–$20,000) due to the presence of his horses, acknowledging the legal limitations on city-imposed fencing. - Mr. Hall (Item 3.6): Stated that while there is precedent for pedestrian crossings off the trail, the current development's lack of connection was a missed opportunity for connectivity. - Mr. Robertson (Item 3.6): Argued against the pylon sign height exception, stating that drivers are already aware of the location and that larger signs do not necessarily improve public safety at 55 mph. - Abram Nielsen (Online Comment, Item 3.6 & 3.7): Stated strong opposition to oversized signs and tree reductions. Position: The city code is well thought out and must be stuck to; justified requests for bigger signs and less parking are not valid arguments. - Lauren Henry (Online Comment, Item 3.6): Expressed support for the 53-foot height justification specifically for drivers traveling east on the commuter lane, noting the need to see available businesses. - Evan Howell (Item 3.10): Expressed concern regarding increased traffic congestion at the 1350 East Main Street intersection. Position: The area is already a traffic cluster, and adding more development will exacerbate safety issues without adequate infrastructure solutions. Discussion Items - Downtown Vitalization Plan (Item 3.1): Staff and the public discussed the plan as a non-regulatory framework. The DRC raised concerns that the initial unit counts were interpreted as targets rather than ideal build scenarios for analysis; language was updated to reflect this and address utility constraints. Public feedback highlighted a conflict between desires for increased housing/density and concerns regarding traffic impacts and Main Street walkability. The plan proposes concentrating housing in specific districts to support retail and mixed-use needs. - Jordan Lee Zone Change (Item 3.2): Staff clarified that while the General Plan designation for the parcel (1035 West Main) was previously updated to commercial, the zoning map on the website had not yet synchronized. The applicant, Robert Lee, confirmed the intent was to facilitate commercial development to match the General Plan and current zoning of the adjacent parcels. - Platinum Peak Flag Lot (Item 3.3): Discussion focused on the applicant's right to develop versus neighbor concerns regarding orientation and fencing. Planning staff noted that while the applicant has the legal right to the flag lot configuration, the commission can impose conditions for orientation as a reasonable mitigation. Staff clarified that mandatory fence requirements for agricultural neighbors (RA1) do not apply to the R18 neighbor to the north due to different grandfathered rights. - Symphony Developments (Items 3.4 & 3.5): The applicant, Russ Wilson, explained the business model focuses on "move-up" housing with large (22,000 sq ft) lots, differing from high-density townhome models. The applicant stated they do not intend to form a HOA for park strip maintenance and acknowledged the lack of a pedestrian bridge connection to the trail system. - Skyview Development Pylon Signs (Item 3.6): Applicant Austin Cope argued that a 53-foot height was necessary for visibility and safe transition from the 55 mph overpass. Commissioner Lockhart and a member of the public argued against the height, citing safety and visual obstruction. The Commission negotiated a compromise to reduce the height to 40 feet while maintaining the square footage. - The Collective Site Plan (Item 3.7): Discussion addressed the request to reduce trees from 580 to 381 due to grade constraints and retaining walls. Staff and the applicant explained that the site's 90-foot elevation drop and utility easements made the code requirement unfeasible without sacrificing significant usable development area or increasing parking to an extent that would not satisfy market demands for specific tenants like Whole Foods. - Hammond Development Agreement (Item 3.8): The applicant, Justin Hammond, explained the move to a Development Agreement rather than a Heavy Commercial rezoning to address neighbor concerns. The plan involves a light office/warehouse project with a 6-foot rock wall buffer. Neighbor Dennis Schoonover noted the offset of the wall to preserve established Chinese elm trees, though expressed concern that if the trees cannot be saved, the applicant might revert to a mixed-use drive-thru concept. - JDH Property Development Agreement (Item 3.9): Review of adding 30 residential units to the West Project to increase development viability. Staff and the applicant confirmed no pedestrian railroad crossing would be included in this phase. - Water's Edge Development Agreement (Item 3.10): Applicant Bob Purdue detailed the agreement for a 330-unit residential development and a 3-to-4-star hotel. Discussion included the feasibility of a 4-star hotel (deemed difficult by the applicant compared to a 3-star) and ongoing coordination with American Fork and Walmart regarding access road connections. Commissioner Lockhart expressed frustration that the Development Agreement circumvents the General Plan's Planned Unit Development (TOD) intent, though others noted it provides necessary control over specific uses. - December 2025 Scheduling: The Commission discussed rescheduling the December 11th meeting and converting the December 4th work session into a regular meeting to accommodate year-end development agreements. A joint dinner with the City Council was proposed for December 16th at the new City Hall. Key Outcomes - Item 3.1 (Downtown Plan): Motion carried to provide a positive recommendation to City Council, finding the plan meets state code requirements and supports moderate income housing goals, with all DRC comments included. - Item 3.2 (Jordan Lee): Motion carried to recommend approval with findings that the change brings consistency with the General Plan and compatibility with surrounding properties, contingent on including DRC comments. - Item 3.3 (Platinum Peak Flag Lot): Motion carried to approve the conditional use with the specific condition that the future home must face westward to align with neighborhood patterns, acknowledging that the applicant and neighbors agreed to this orientation. The commission declined to impose a fence condition, citing legal limitations regarding the neighbor's rights. - Item 3.4 (Symphony Zone Change): Motion carried to recommend approval with findings that the zone change fits the General Plan designation and is compatible with the character of the surrounding area. - Item 3.5 (Symphony Concept Plan): Motion carried to approve the concept plan with findings of conformance to the Development Code and General Plan, contingent upon the City Council's approval of the associated zone change (Item 3.4). - Item 3.6 (Skyview Pylon Signs): Motion carried with a 3-2 vote to approve the exception for sign height with a maximum limit of 40 feet (reduced from the requested 53 feet), finding the height justified for traffic safety and terrain visibility. The square footage exception was also granted. - Item 3.7 (The Collective): Motion carried 4-1 to approve the site plan with an exception to the tree requirement (reducing from 580 to 381 trees), finding the applicant met all other landscaping requirements. The vote included a directive to the city to reconsider the 30 trees per acre code requirement for large-scale developments with significant grade constraints. - Item 3.8 (Hammond): Motion carried to provide a positive recommendation to City Council, finding the development agreement conforms to the General Plan and is consistent with neighboring mixed-use uses. - Item 3.9 (JDH): Motion carried (3-2) to provide a positive recommendation to City Council, finding the addition of 30 units provides access to trails and roads and conforms to the General Plan. - Item 3.10 (Water's Edge): Motion carried to provide a positive recommendation to City Council, finding the development agreement allows for necessary residential and commercial development within utility constraints and includes required trail and road connections. The commission noted the compromise on hotel rating (3 to 4-star) and the complex approval status of access connections with American Fork and Walmart. - Scheduling: Commission authorized the rescheduling of December meetings: December 4th will be a regular meeting (replacing the work session), December 11th will be cancelled, and December 16th will feature a joint dinner with the City Council followed by a council meeting.

The Lehigh City Council convened for a pre-council session and regular meeting on October 28, 2025, to address routine administrative matters, approve several significant resolutions, and hear public testimony. Following a closed-door session regarding imminent litigation and real estate, the council held a public comment period featuring resident feedback and proceeded to approve a telecommunications franchise, budget amendments, power system impact fees, and a solar energy project agreement. Consent Calendar - The council unanimously approved the consent agenda as presented. Public Comments & Testimony - Vern Keysler (Resident): Expressed full gratitude and support for Mayor Johnson's 25+ years of service to the community. He voiced strong support for the city's professional staff, specifically praising recent sidewalk "gap projects" near Sky Ridge High School, 2600 North, the completion of the Sixth East corridor, and the construction of new parks. - Lily Leighton (Resident): Expressed safety concerns regarding a narrowed "hourglass" section on 900 North between 1700 East and 1200 East, noting the risk for new and experienced drivers. She requested the council explore widening the road. - Response: Staff noted that while part of the road is county jurisdiction, the issue is on their radar, though property acquisition and irrigation ditches present challenges. - Rachel Anderson (Resident): Expressed worry about the increased risk of head-on collisions due to the implementation of flex lanes on Pioneer Crossing without movable barriers. She requested influence on implementing additional safety measures. - Response: Staff acknowledged the concern, noted that national safety standards must be adhered to, and stated they will observe the implementation over time. - Union Representative: Expressed support for including Union Carpenters on future projects to provide trade opportunities for young people, noting that subcontractors are currently making it difficult for locals to enter the trade. - Maxwell Yingling (Resident/Student): Expressed strong support for extending sidewalk infrastructure on major streets like State Street to ensure safe pedestrian access to public transportation stops, noting current gaps force unsafe travel conditions. Discussion Items - Resolution 2025-75 (Telecommunications Franchise): Council considered granting Summit IG Utah a non-exclusive franchise. The item was presented as standard terms. - Resolution 2025-76 (Budget Amendment): The amendment was presented to roll forward previously budgeted capital projects, pay for insurance claims from reserves, authorize a fire department grant expenditure, budget for the purchase of property next to the power department, and allocate Coomer Trust funds for library books. The presenter clarified the library funding adds $50k to the existing $225k book budget. - Power Systems Impact Fee Amendments: Susie Becker from Science Public Finance presented the Impact Fee Facilities Plan (IFFP) and Analysis (IFA). She highlighted a 79 MW growth over the next 10 years necessitating new facilities and excess capacity buy-ins. The proposal indicates a 28% rate increase to align with inflation, raising the maximum fee from $1,200 to $1,575. Council members confirmed the calculation methods and questioned the 79 MW figure, which was defined as total growth, not an average. - UAMPS Fremont Solar Project (Resolution 2025-77): The council reviewed a 25-year Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) for 18.38 megawatts at $35-$45/MWh. The presentation explained that the price is advantageous due to included transmission interconnection and eligibility for tax credits. A battery storage component (49.5 MW, 4-hour duration) allows for load shifting, stabilizing rates against future price escalation. Staff emphasized this adds diversity to the current portfolio, which lacks solar-plus-battery and geothermal resources. Key Outcomes - Closed Session: The council voted unanimously (all Aye) to enter a closed executive session for imminent litigation, real estate, and potential litigation. - Epilepsy Awareness: The Mayor signed Proclamation 2025-75 designating November 2025 as Epilepsy Awareness Month, noting it is the 12th annual proclamation. - Telecommunications Franchise: Resolution 2025-75 was approved unanimously. Roll call vote: Yes (Paul, Heather, Chris, Michelle, Mayor). - Budget Amendment: Resolution 2025-76 was approved unanimously following a public hearing. Roll call vote: Yes (Heather, Chris, Michelle, Paul, Mayor). - Impact Fees: Ordinance 64-2025 was approved unanimously, adopting the Impact Fee Facilities Plan and Analysis and amending power fees. Roll call vote: Yes (Mayor, Chris, Michelle, Paul, Heather). - Solar Project: Resolution 2025-77 was approved unanimously to approve the UAMPS Fremont Solar Project Agreement. Roll call vote: Yes (Chris, Michelle, Paul, Heather, Mayor). - Adjournment: The regular meeting was adjourned.

On October 23, 2025, the Lehigh City Planning Commission convened to review zoning changes, subdivision proposals, and area plan amendments. Due to a temporary lack of a full quorum, the Commission authorized three members to conduct business, electing Emily as Acting Chair for the evening. The meeting proceeded with the approval of several routine items and the tabling of a major revitalization plan to allow for further engineering review and public engagement. Consent Calendar - Approved agenda items 2.1 and 2.2 (routine agenda items) unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Scott Pettett: Expressed concerns regarding traffic safety and potential speeding on Utah Highlands Drive resulting from the proposed three-lot subdivision. Inquired about the need for a frontage road or turn lanes to mitigate intersection safety issues, noting the proximity to newly opened soccer fields. Stated that the road currently experiences significant speeding. - Scott Cutler (Online Comment): Initially expressed concern that the project might involve high-density development (townhomes) near environmentally sensitive areas. In a follow-up comment, stated that upon clarification that the project consists of only three single-family homes, he views it as an acceptable addition to the neighborhood. - Applicant Feedback: John Hadfield's representative (via staff summary) agreed to place a note on the plat indicating that Lot 1's driveway will be positioned as far away from the intersection as possible. Discussion Items - Item 3.1 (Smith Zone Change): Discussed Eric Smith's request to rezone 0.4 acres at 235 West State Street from R2 (medium density residential) to neighborhood commercial to match the general plan. The applicant, Bob Smith, appeared but requested no comment, stating the request was straightforward. Staff confirmed the change aligns with the general plan. - Item 3.2 (Hadfield Subdivision): Deliberated on John Hadfield's request for preliminary subdivision approval for a three-lot subdivision at 600 East Utah Highlands Drive (re-appropriating a 2006 expired approval). Staff confirmed the lots meet R115 standards. Public discussion focused on lot orientation, ADU eligibility, and traffic impacts. The applicant agreed to document driveway placement on the plat. - Item 3.3 (Sky Area Plan Amendment): Deliberated on Gardener Companies' request for exceptions to design requirements for the Sky area plan due to steep grades. Two exceptions were proposed: allowing drive-throughs adjacent to major arterials (removing the exception requirement) and shifting 20% glass facade requirements to front or side elevations when facing steep grades rather than public streets. The applicant, Mark Murdoch, clarified that the intent is to preserve pedestrian-friendly linear parks and that glass placement is purely aesthetic due to topography. Staff and Commission agreed the requests made sense given the site constraints. - Item 3.4 (Downtown Revitalization Plan): Discussed the downtown revitalization and State Street station area plan. Consultant Sam Taylor presented the 160-page vision document. Key discussion points included: - Public Engagement: Staff noted low response rates (22 responses) on the recent online survey, with only 18 residents responding, despite broader past engagement. - Key Concerns: Residents expressed anxiety over traffic volume, parking loss, and the potential for the transit station to require Union Pacific to move a railroad turnaround. - Plan Status: The Commission noted the plan is a visionary guide (20+ year horizon) and that specific details are illustrative. A specific recommendation for a "100 East commercial overlay" was removed based on prior feedback. - Engineering Review: The Engineering Department requested additional time to review the plan, particularly regarding infrastructure and the railroad turnaround constraints. Key Outcomes - Acting Chair: Motion passed to appoint Emily as Acting Chair for the evening. - Item 3.1 (Smith Zone Change): Motion carried approving the zone change from R2 to neighborhood commercial with a positive recommendation. Findings include consistency with the general plan, compatibility with surrounding uses, and suitability for identified uses. - Item 3.2 (Hadfield Subdivision): Motion carried approving the preliminary subdivision approval for the three-lot subdivision. Findings confirm compliance with Lehigh City Development Code and inclusion of DRC comments. - Item 3.3 (Sky Area Plan): Motion carried recommending approval of the area plan amendment. Findings state the amendment provides necessary design flexibility while preserving the intent of the design requirements and contributing to a quality community. - Item 3.4 (Downtown Plan): Motion carried to table the Downtown Revitalization Plan and State Street Station Area Plan until the next meeting (November 13, 2025). The tabling allows time for Engineering to finalize reviews and for the Commission to solicit additional public feedback. The Public Hearing is noted as being kept open for the subsequent meeting. - Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned on motion by the Chair. A work session originally scheduled for November 6th may be canceled or combined into regular meetings depending on the agenda load for November 13th and 20th.

The Lehi City Council met on October 14, 2025, for a pre-council session at 5:30 PM and a regular session at 7:00 PM. The pre-council included the Youth Council oath of office, a presentation on the Transit Fresh Look Study, discussion of a shift differential pay policy for police, and the quarterly financial report. The regular session featured public comments, consent agenda approvals, and consideration of several ordinances, including general plan amendments and a new affordable housing overlay. Key decisions included approval of connectivity standards, annexation, and a general plan amendment, while a high-density housing amendment and a starter home ordinance were denied. Consent Calendar - Approved purchase orders (PO Index, PO 8162 Power, PO 8172 Truvac, PO 8173 Premier Truck). - Approved city council meeting minutes from August 26, 2025, and September 9, 2025. - Re-approved Ordinance 54-2025 (dissolving Thanksgiving Park Economic Development Project) and Ordinance 55-2025 (dissolving SR-92 Digital Drive Community Reinvestment Project Area). Public Comments & Testimony - Pedestrian Safety at Ascent Academy: Multiple residents, including Jessica Willardson and Michael Ray (whose child was struck by a car), urged the city to install a crosswalk, sidewalk, and crossing guard on 900 North. Luke, the city traffic engineer, presented options and committed to installing a school crosswalk, a 20 mph school zone, and a crossing guard. He also noted that a sidewalk gap would be filled in spring 2025. - Bull River Road General Plan Amendment: Several residents (Shannon Totham, Jonathan Madsen, Alan Hawley, Casey Barrett, and others) spoke in opposition to changing the land use from Low Density Residential (LDR) to High Density Residential (HDR), citing incompatibility with the surrounding neighborhood, traffic, and safety concerns. No residents spoke in favor. - SHAR Ordinance: Multiple residents (Laura Stevens, Kaylin Osborne, James Harrison, Rachel Freeman, Shannon Totham, Emily Stembridge, and others) opposed the Starter Home Attainable Residential (SHAR) ordinance, raising concerns about deed restriction enforcement, lack of transparency, parking, and infrastructure strain. No residents spoke in favor. - Other Public Comments: Spencer Fife asked about congressional redistricting; the council deferred to state legislators. A question about cell phone policies in schools was directed to the state. Discussion Items - Transit Fresh Look Study (Pre-Council): Kendall Willardson (Mountainland Association of Governments) presented a regional transit vision for northwest Utah County, focusing on bus rapid transit and light rail corridors. Councilmembers expressed concerns about the proposed Pony Express/Bull River alignment, advocating for a route using 2300 West and Pioneer Crossing to capture more ridership in Lehi. The study is expected to finalize in November 2025. - Shift Differential Pay Policy (Pre-Council): Police Chief Paul proposed a 5% pay differential for graveyard shifts and 2.5% for evening shifts to improve officer retention and wellness. The council gave informal support to develop a draft for a future vote. - Quarterly Financial Report (Pre-Council): Finance Director Dean Lundell reported sales tax revenue of $25.2 million (budget $23.7M), property tax of $16 million (budget $16.1M), and total general fund revenue of $65.7 million. The ending fund balance was $24.5 million (just over 30% of one year's revenue), with allocations for reserves, rainy day fund, and risk management. Enterprise fund reserves were also reviewed. - Development Code Amendment - Connectivity Standards (Item 5): Councilmember Kim Struthers explained the amendment to Chapter 37, adding flexibility for vehicular connectivity when traffic volumes are high. Approved 4-0. - JDH Olson Annexation (Item 6): Public hearing held; no comments. Approved: Resolution 2025-74 (annexation agreement) and Ordinance 63-2025 (R-1-22 zoning). Both passed 4-0. - Lee General Plan Amendment (Item 7): Robert Lee requested changing 0.5 acres at 1035 West Main from MDR to Commercial for a real estate office. Approved 3-1 (Councilmember Newell voted no). - Bull River Road General Plan Amendment (Item 8): Perry Homes requested changing 1.48 acres from LDR to HDR for a townhome development. After extensive public opposition and council discussion citing incompatibility with the neighborhood and lack of justification, the motion to deny passed 4-0. The applicant can develop under existing R-1-22 zoning. - SHAR Ordinance (Item 9): A lengthy discussion centered on deed restriction enforcement, infrastructure needs, and potential state mandates. Council voted 4-0 to deny the ordinance without prejudice, directing staff to research similar ordinances in other cities (e.g., Heber, Ephraim) and address enforcement concerns. Key Outcomes - Consent agenda approved (all items). - Ordinance 59-2025 (Chapter 37 Connectivity Standards) approved 4-0. - Resolution 2025-74 and Ordinance 63-2025 (JDH Olson Annexation) approved 4-0. - Ordinance 62-2025 (Lee General Plan Amendment) approved 3-1. - Ordinance 60-2025 (Bull River Road General Plan Amendment) denied 4-0. - Ordinance 61-2025 (SHAR Ordinance) denied 4-0 without prejudice. - Ascent Academy Safety: Luke (Traffic Engineer) committed to installing a school crosswalk, a 20 mph school zone, and a crossing guard; a sidewalk gap will be completed in spring 2025.

The Lehi Planning Commission met on October 9, 2025, at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers. The meeting included approval of minutes, a request to swap an amenity from an amphitheater to a dog park, a conditional use for a 70-foot flagpole, and a discussion on a development code amendment. The commission voted 3-2 to approve the amenity swap, unanimously approved the flagpole, and voted 4-1 to table the code amendment for further refinement. Consent Calendar - Approved the minutes from the September 4, 2025, work session unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Candice Clark (resident near Pioneer Crossing and 300 East) expressed concerns about high-density development being placed near existing low-density neighborhoods, urging the commission to be mindful of the city's growth and character. She noted that while she understood the code amendment was different, she wanted to voice general concerns. - Chase Clark (husband of Candice) thanked the commission for their service, stating he is pleased with Lehi City's management of growth, utilities, and zoning, and expressed gratitude for the commission's work. Discussion Items 3.1 – Clyde Capital Group’s request to swap the amphitheater for a dog park at Vistas at the Point - Staff provided background: the amphitheater was moved to its current location after a voluntary wind study with Flight Park. The applicant now proposes substituting the amphitheater with a dog park, arguing it will be more used by residents. The applicant (Clayton Rackham) presented a cost comparison showing both amenities around $250,000. Commissioners expressed frustration over inconsistent information and lack of full wind study data but acknowledged the dog park could be a better amenity. After debate, Commissioner Roberts moved to approve the swap with findings that the dog park is of equivalent value and including DRC comments. The motion passed 3-2. 3.2 – Thanksgiving Park’s request for a 70-foot flagpole at 3401 North Thanksgiving Way - Staff noted that flagpoles over 30 feet require conditional use approval. The applicant (Mark Ostabo) stated the flagpole will be at the height of the adjacent buildings (about 70 feet) and will be lit per flag code. The commission supported the request, noting precedent in the city (e.g., Tag and Go car wash). A motion to approve with standard findings carried unanimously 5-0. 3.3 – Lehi City’s Development Code Amendment to Chapter 4 (adding exhibit for General Plan, Zoning, and Development Code Amendments) - Staff explained the amendment would allow applicants to submit an illustrative exhibit concurrent with a general plan or zone change application, providing clarity without the full review of a concept plan. Commissioners debated the need for codification, concerns about potential bait-and-switch, equity issues, and whether exhibits could unduly sway decisions. Commissioner Ayer moved to table the item to allow staff to refine language that maximizes transparency and avoids vesting rights. The motion passed 4-1. Key Outcomes - Consent Agenda: Approved. - Item 3.1: Approved (3-2) to allow swapping the amphitheater for a dog park, with findings of equivalent value and DRC comments. - Item 3.2: Approved (5-0) for conditional use of a 70-foot flagpole at Thanksgiving Park, with standard findings. - Item 3.3: Tabled (4-1) for further refinement of language to increase transparency and streamline the process. - City Business: Noted upcoming public input on the Downtown Revitalization/Station Area Plan and a joint work session on updating design standards.

The Lehi City Planning Commission met on September 25, 2025, at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers. The commission considered six regular agenda items, including zoning requests, a concept plan exception, a conditional use, general plan amendments, and a proposed affordable housing ordinance. The commission approved consent items, recommended approval for three items, recommended denial for two items, and voted to negatively recommend the SHAR ordinance. Consent Calendar - Approval of the minutes from the August 28, 2025, meeting was moved and seconded, passed unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 3.4 (Warner Transport): Lorraine Abell (adjacent property owner) submitted an online comment expressing cautious optimism about the applicant's willingness to comply with buffering, dust mitigation, and groundwater concerns. A public commenter (Casey Glade) criticized the city for inconsistent enforcement of dust mitigation but urged approval of the applicant. - Item 3.5 (Bull River GPA): Multiple residents spoke in opposition. Alan Hawley argued the project is inconsistent with the development code, incompatible with the neighborhood character, and would create safety and parking issues. Others echoed concerns about traffic, parking overflow, and distrust of Perry Homes. Some residents requested that pedestrian access be blocked to prevent parking in the cul-de-sac. Online comments from Mark Stillings, Scott MT, Lane and Leanne Simmons, and Jared Peterson opposed the rezoning. - Item 3.6 (SHAR Ordinance): Kenneth Glade spoke against the ordinance, arguing it transfers value from existing residents to developers and lacks transparency. Laura Stevens raised concerns about enforceability and loopholes. Larry Hadfield criticized the small lot sizes and lack of open space. Marshall Gary suggested learning from incremental development models and questioned specific provisions (e.g., detached-only, price cap, public hearing requirements). Two online comments (Megalyn Sayer and Bud Lamb) supported the ordinance. Discussion Items - 3.1 JDH Olson Annexation (R-1-22 Zoning): Staff recommended approval as the zoning conforms to the general plan. No public comments. The commission voted unanimously to recommend positively to the city council, including DRC comments. - 3.2 Lee General Plan Amendment (MDR to Commercial): Staff explained that similar changes have occurred nearby. The applicant, Robert Lee, stated the intent is to build an office warehouse for his real estate business. Discussion clarified differences between commercial and neighborhood commercial zones. The commission voted to recommend positively, with a finding that it does not conform to the existing general plan but no negative comments were received. - 3.3 Life Time Fitness Concept Plan (Parking Exception): The applicant presented the building orientation to engage with a planned trail rather than the street. Parking was noted as over the minimum. The commission approved the concept plan, finding that the exception still allows pedestrian access and is consistent with the code and general plan. All DRC comments included. - 3.4 Warner Transport Conditional Use (Rock, Sand, Gravel, Topsoil Storage): Applicant Johnny Warner described past compliance issues and promised dust mitigation, speed control, and buffering. Staff noted 13 DRC comments. The commission discussed whether concrete recycling falls under the use and decided to include it but not concrete manufacturing. The motion passed unanimously. - 3.5 Bull River Road General Plan Amendment (LDR to HDR): Applicant Lindsay Neve (Perry Homes) proposed 14 townhomes (down to 12 if needed) on 1.48 acres. Neighbors strongly opposed, citing traffic, safety, parking, and incompatibility. The commission noted the island of high density in a low-density area and voted to negatively recommend to city council, finding it inconsistent with the general plan and adjacent land uses. - 3.6 SHAR Ordinance (Starter Home Attainable Residential): Staff presented the ordinance as a voluntary overlay allowing 150% density bonus for small single-family homes (under 1,200 sq ft) on lots under 6,000 sq ft, with owner occupancy and a $400,000 price cap. The commission discussed concerns about enforceability of deed restrictions, the fixed price cap, limited applicability, and potential for developer abuse. The commission voted unanimously to negatively recommend to city council, finding it not in conformance with the general plan. Key Outcomes - Items 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4: Approved/positively recommended unanimously. - Item 3.5: Negatively recommended to city council (unanimous). The council will consider it on October 14, 2025. Residents were encouraged to contact council members. - Item 3.6: Negatively recommended to city council (unanimous) with findings of non-conformance with the general plan. The commission expressed openness to alternative approaches. - City Business: Staff reminded of the APA Utah Chapter fall conference (October 9-10) and the next work session for training. - Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at approximately 9:12 PM.

The Lehi City Council met on September 23, 2025, for a pre-council session at 6:00 PM and a regular session at 7:00 PM. The meeting covered parking solutions at Lehi High School, participation in a solar and battery storage project, approval of several resolutions, and a public hearing on a general plan amendment. Key outcomes included tabling the Water's Edge development with a directive to negotiate a development agreement, and approval of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Consent Calendar - Purchase Orders and Meeting Minutes: The council approved the consent agenda, including purchase orders (e.g., Olympus Precast, Mountainland Supply, Skye Substation Engineering) and the meeting minutes from September 2, 2025. (Unanimous approval) Public Comments & Testimony - 20‑Minute Citizen Input: Multiple residents spoke on various topics: - David Speed (419 S. 1430 W.) expressed concern about drainage and elevation from a new subdivision behind his home. - Paige (Skyridge student) asked about Alpine School District elementary boundary changes and the new Cold Springs Elementary. - Corgan Reeves requested traffic enforcement on Traverse Mountain due to speeding. - Lily Leighton inquired about the completion date of the Lehi Public Library (expected December 2025). - Macy Meyer asked about congestion relief on I-15 and Main Street. - Jose Zuriga (carpenters union rep) urged the city to consider certified union apprentices for the Alpine High School project. - A Skyridge student asked whether the Parks Master Plan addresses walkability and social infrastructure. - Anna Van Orman asked about water preparedness for growth; staff noted proactive water procurement. - James Harrison asked about access to Ozure Park and later spoke about the 2300 West project. - Another student asked about construction on 2600 N.; staff explained it was a gas line replacement project. - Public Hearing on Parks Master Plan (Item 10): Several residents spoke in favor of amending the plan to prioritize a park at the “Bermuda Triangle” (land near Belmont Elementary). Speakers included Laura A., Amy Welsh, Judith, Dan Fix, Jenna Cauver, Rachel Freeman, Casey Thomas, Kevin and Sheila Upchurch, and Monica Davis. They requested a neighborhood park with playground, shade, trails, and restrooms, citing a park gap in the Traverse Mountain/Belmont area. Some asked for a quiet, natural park to preserve neighbor peace. Rachel Freeman also raised concerns about inadequate baseball fields on the east side and a potential recreation center partnership with the YMCA. - Public Hearing on Water’s Edge (Item 14): Rachel Freeman also commented on this item, expressing concerns about traffic, fire access, and high density in the area. Discussion Items - Parking at Lehi High School (Pre‑Council): Staff presented options to add student parking: (1) changing municipal code to allow parking on 500 E., 300 N., and along the post office, totaling about 46 potential stalls; (2) accepting a UDOT‑deeded grassy area north of 300 N. on 500 E. for a 66‑stall parking lot to be leased to the school district. The council noted that the school district had lost 178 church parking stalls and that the city had previously tried to solve the school’s parking problem. The council preferred to pursue the UDOT property option before modifying the code. They directed staff to pursue the land transfer and lease with the school district. - UAMPS Fremont Solar and Battery Storage Project (Pre‑Council): Staff presented a power purchase agreement for 49.5 MW of solar with 4‑hour battery storage (198 MWh). The projected energy cost is $35/MWh (solar) plus $13.50/kW‑month (battery), blending to about $73/MWh. Staff noted that the project would not add upward pressure on rates and would help stabilize energy supply. The council asked about transmission constraints and the need to start construction by July 2026 to capture federal tax incentives. Staff will provide an executive summary before a formal vote in late October. - Water Revenue Bonds (Items 5 & 6): A public hearing was held for the issuance of water revenue bonds to fund a storage building at the public works yard and expansion of a pressurized irrigation reservoir. No public comments were made. The council then approved Resolution 2025‑67 authorizing the bond issuance (1% loan from the state). (Vote: 4‑0) - Hydro Vac Excavation Contract (Item 7): The council approved Resolution 2025‑73, a three‑year contract with Hydro Vac Excavation for installation of pressurized irrigation meters. The contract is the lowest of six bids; about 10,000 meters have been installed, with 4,500 remaining. (Vote: 4‑0) - Real Estate Purchase (Item 9): The council approved Resolution 2025‑68 authorizing the purchase of 2.57 acres at 530 W. 300 N. The city plans to potentially lease the existing building on the property to Strata for one to two years until their Main Street project is complete. (Vote: 4‑0) - Parks and Recreation Master Plan (Item 10): After extensive public comment, the council approved Resolution 2025‑69 adopting the 2025 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Staff noted that the plan is a guide and that the city is already internally designing a park at the “Bermuda Triangle” site, with funding to be requested in the February budget. (Vote: 4‑0) - Bicycle Skills Park (Item 11): The council approved Resolution 2025‑70, an agreement with Avid Trails for design and construction of a bicycle skills park at Shadow Ridge (Phase 2). (Vote: 4‑0) - Power Engineers Agreement (Item 12): The council approved Resolution 2025‑72, a three‑year general services agreement with Power Engineers for technical engineering services, including work on the Skye substation. (Vote: 4‑0) - 2300 West Roadway Widening (Item 13): The council approved Resolution 2025‑71, a second amended interlocal agreement with Utah County to extend the contract for striping work to be completed in spring 2026. (Vote: 4‑0) - Water’s Edge General Plan Amendment (Item 14): The applicant, Bob Perdue, requested changing the land use designation from Transit Oriented Development (TOD) to Mixed‑Use on 13.02 acres near 1300 E. 175 S. The proposal included up to 330 residential units, a hotel, for‑sale townhomes, and a pedestrian bridge. Concerns were raised about traffic, infrastructure capacity, loss of commercial land, and nuisance issues. After discussion, the council voted to table the ordinance and direct staff to negotiate a development agreement that would require: a high‑end hotel, at least 30% owner‑occupied for‑sale housing, necessary infrastructure studies (traffic, sewer, water, power), a public pedestrian bridge, road connectivity to Woodbury and Walmart, and measures to address transient nuisance. The ultimate zoning change (to Mixed‑Use or staying Commercial) will be determined when the development agreement returns. (Vote to table: 4‑0) Key Outcomes - Approved: Consent agenda, water bond resolution (4‑0), Hydro Vac contract (4‑0), real estate purchase (4‑0), Parks Master Plan (4‑0), bicycle skills park agreement (4‑0), Power Engineers agreement (4‑0), 2300 West interlocal amendment (4‑0). - Tabled: Water’s Edge General Plan Amendment; staff directed to craft a development agreement with specific parameters. - Directed: Staff to pursue UDOT land transfer for Lehi High School parking and to negotiate a lease with the school district. - Upcoming: Formal vote on UAMPS solar project expected in late October 2025; budget request for the Belmont area park in February 2026.

The Lehi Planning Commission met on September 11, 2025, at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers. The meeting included approval of consent agenda items, discussion of a proposed amenity change for a large development, a fence request, a subdivision approval, and a development code amendment. Consent Calendar - Approval of the minutes from the August 14, 2025 meeting was approved unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 3.4 (Development Code Amendment): Peter Ovard spoke in favor of the proposed changes to Chapter 37 Connectivity Standards, stating they align with UDOT terminology and support modal filters and traffic calming. Discussion Items - Item 3.1 – Vistas at the Point Amenities Revision (Clyde Capital Group): The applicant requested to remove the amphitheater from required amenities and replace it with a dog park and enhanced overlook park. The item was tabled from the May 8, 2025 meeting. Commissioners discussed the value of the dog park versus the amphitheater, concerns about the TOD designation, and the need for a wind study and justification. A motion to table the item again passed. - Item 3.2 – Moto United Fence (Colby Anderson): Request to approve an 8-foot CMU security fence along the north property line at 405 South Millpond Drive for security and loading purposes. The commission approved the request unanimously. - Item 3.3 – Garden Park Subdivision (Adam Albrecht): Request for preliminary subdivision approval of a 4-lot residential development at 500 South Center Street, meeting R1-Flex zone requirements. The commission approved the request unanimously. - Item 3.4 – Development Code Amendment to Chapter 37 (Lehi City): Proposed updates to connectivity standards, including updating definitions, changing "trail" to "shared use path," and adding provisions for modal filters, street closures, and access management improvements. The commission recommended approval to the City Council unanimously. Key Outcomes - Item 3.1: Motion to table the Clyde Capital Group request passed (with a second and majority vote). The applicant is to provide additional information including the wind study and justification for the dog park location. - Item 3.2: Approved (motion and second, unanimous). - Item 3.3: Approved (motion and second, unanimous). - Item 3.4: Positive recommendation to City Council (motion and second, unanimous). - City business reminders: Upcoming work session on September 25, 2025, will include several general plan amendments and the SHAR ordinance.