Public Meetings - Nashua, New Hampshire

The Nashua Planning Board convened on June 4, 2026, at 6:14 PM to address several subdivision applications, site plan extensions, and a zoning referral. The meeting lasted approximately one hour and concluded with approvals for two subdivisions and three extension requests, alongside a favorable recommendation for a zoning map amendment. Key Outcomes - 24 Simon Street Subdivision (Case 826-0071): Unanimously granted a waiver (190-282B9) to show existing conditions within 1,000 feet, and approved the final subdivision plan for a two-lot division, subject to staff conditions (stricken condition D). - 55A Middle Dunstable Road Subdivision (Case 826-0077): Unanimously granted two waivers (190-282B9 and 190-275 for a lighting plan) and approved the final subdivision, subject to conditions A through M. - 24 East Otterson Street Site Plan Extension (Case 826-0070): Unanimously approved a 12-month extension for a previously approved site plan (originally May 15, 2025), finding the application met NRO 190-146D. - 11-13 Mulberry Street Site Plan Extension (Case 826-0084): Unanimously approved a 12-month extension for a 64-unit, five-story multifamily development (originally approved June 5, 2025), citing NRO 190-146D. - Zoning Map Amendment (O-26-013): Unanimously voted a favorable recommendation to the Board of Aldermen to rezone land along Northeastern Boulevard and Industrial Park Drive to Highway Business. Discussion Items 24 Simon Street Subdivision (Case 826-0071) - Applicant: Mike Dalver (T.F. Moran) presented a plan to subdivide 2.6 acres of surplus land in the park industrial zone into two lots (addressing 24 Simon Street and 36 Simon Street). - Waiver: A waiver to show existing conditions within 1,000 feet was granted, with a finding that strict conformance would cause unnecessary hardship. - Staff Notes: Engineering issued no comments; condition D was stricken and remaining conditions renumbered. 55A Middle Dunstable Road Subdivision (Case 826-0077) - Applicant: Jim Petropolis (IMAG Corp) represented Marathon Building and Development, proposing a one-into-two lot subdivision. - Prior Approvals: The lot had received a variance for lot width (100.2 ft vs. 120 ft required) and a special exception from the Zoning Board of Adjustment, with Conservation Commission support. - Waivers: Two waivers granted: to show existing conditions within 1,000 feet and to provide a photometric lighting plan. - Environmental: 1,290 square feet of wetland buffer impacted (mowed lawn, to be revegetated); no wetlands affected. - Infrastructure: New lot to be served by municipal sewer and water; a 15-foot-wide sewer easement through the existing lot connects to Ridge Road gravity sewer. 24 East Otterson Street Site Plan Extension (Case 826-0070) - Property Sold: Staff noted the property has been sold, indicating a buyer likely to execute the approved development plan. - Extension: 12-month extension granted with no changes to prior approvals. 11-13 Mulberry Street Site Plan Extension (Case 826-0084) - Applicant: Ravia Johnson (Godessman Hollis) representing Mulberry Street Nashua, LLC, requested a 12-month extension due to complexities (demolition, new construction, no staging area). - Alderman Clee's Concerns: Noted parking shortages (trash pickup, fencing); no parking required in the zone. - Public Correspondence: A letter from a resident of 249 Main Street (a development with no parking) complained about parking. - Grandfathering: Staff confirmed extensions do not trigger re-review under any new code updates. Zoning Map Amendment (O-26-013) - Description: Proposed to rezone land along Northeastern Boulevard and Industrial Park Drive from Park Industrial to Highway Business, extending the Highway Business District. - Impetus: A restaurant proposed at 20 Industrial Park Drive; the use would be permitted under upcoming recode. - Public Process: Board members noted the amendment would require a public hearing at the Planning & Economic Development Committee and final approval by the Board of Aldermen, offering the public multiple opportunities to comment. - Strategic Plan: Board member McIntyre asked about alignment with the city's strategic plan; staff said the master plan envisions this area as industrial/commercial, but a restaurant is not incompatible. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were received for any agenda items. Consent Calendar - Minutes: Unanimously approved the minutes of the May 21, 2026 meeting. - Communications: Updated engineering comment letters and revised waiver letters for 55A Middle Dunstable Road; RB Farms case postponed to June 25, 2026. - Tentative Agenda: Board found no projects of regional significance. Adjournment - The meeting was adjourned at 8:03 PM following a motion by Alderman Clee.

The Board of Aldermen held a special meeting on Thursday, June 4, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. in the Aldermanic Chamber (adjourned at 9:08 p.m.). The sole agenda item was a presentation by Harriman on the citywide school facilities master plan. After a motion and roll call vote, a public comment period was added at the end of the meeting. The presentation included data on declining enrollment, building conditions, repair costs, and five long‑term options. No votes were taken on the study itself. Roll Call and Opening - 11 aldermen were present, establishing a quorum. Mayor Jim Donchis and Corporation Counsel Steve Bolton also attended. - The prayer was offered by Alderman Tebow; the pledge was led by Alderman Senate. Consent Calendar - None. Public Comments & Testimony - Jen Bishop (Board of Education President) urged alignment between the Board of Education and Board of Aldermen, stressing that the school board cannot finalize a plan without understanding the aldermen’s budget priorities. - Mather Raymond (Board of Education Clerk) provided enrollment data: Nashua public schools have 9,500 students, down from 13,000 fifteen years ago; 6,000 charter students statewide (1,000 from Nashua); 2,900 private‑school students from Nashua, with 600 receiving vouchers costing $2.2 million annually. He noted that declining birth rates, not charter schools, are the primary driver of enrollment loss. - Rob Johnson (Board of Education member) expressed concern that closing schools would lower property values and leave vacant buildings for extended periods (e.g., Elm Street). He advocated for more options in the study. - Megan Lampier (Board of Education member) emphasized that children’s needs should come first; she cautioned that busing costs could offset savings from school closures. - Sandor Salvi (Board of Education member) stressed the need to invest in public schools to compete with charter schools and to increase enrollment to lower per‑pupil costs. - Chesley Marvin (resident, 10 Mary Lane) opposed school closures, arguing that neighborhood schools and outdoor play are more important than technology. He called for a clear vision of what the city gives back to communities when it takes away a school. - Unnamed resident (22 Mary Lane) advocated for New Searles Elementary, noting that the repair‑cost data did not account for a recent $1.8 million security vestibule investment, which would lower New Searles’ repair cost from $8.3 million to $6.5 million ($114/sq.ft.). He argued this data discrepancy inappropriately placed New Searles on the closure list. Discussion Items A. Motion to Add Public Comment - Alderman Sullivan moved to add a public comment period at the end of the meeting. Some aldermen opposed, arguing the meeting was only a presentation and that public comment should be directed to the Board of Education, which will make the decision. Others noted that not all wards were notified in advance. The motion passed 7–4 (Aldermen Ravan, Sullivan, Senate, Johnson, Morgan, Lopez, Wilshire voted yes; Smith, Tebow, O’Brien, Dowd, Kelly voted no). B. Harriman Facility Study Presentation (Lisa and Jamie Willet, Harriman) - Enrollment & Demographics: Nashua’s school enrollment is declining. The 2025‑26 K‑12 enrollment was 9,526; projected drop of 680 students (10.6%) over the next three years. The highest projected enrollment (8,876) is in 2026‑27, after which continued decline is expected. Elementary schools are 78% utilized (4,224 capacity vs. projected 4,185 high); middle schools 80% utilized; high schools near capacity (99%). - Facility Conditions: A comprehensive assessment of all schools identified $144.8 million in repair costs over 10 years (in today’s dollars). Critical repairs are concentrated at Amherst and Mount Pleasant (highest totals); Bicentennial, Charlotte, Fairgrounds, Ledge Street, and New Searles also showed higher costs. Cost per square foot was used to normalize comparisons. - Energy Use: Most schools have Energy Use Intensity (EUI) above a new‑construction benchmark of 25–30. Charlotte, New Searles, and the administration building have the highest EUI. Data may not yet reflect recent energy‑efficiency upgrades (e.g., solar panels at McCarthy and Pennichuck). - Educational Visioning: Workshops with 40+ stakeholders identified priorities: hands‑on/project‑based learning, flexible classrooms, safety, special‑education spaces, and community use. The educational specification will guide future design. - Capital Improvement Plan (CIP): The current CIP allocates $2 million/year for repairs, yielding only $20.1 million over 10–12 years—far below the $144.8 million total need. - Options Presented (Elementary Schools): - Option A: Keep all 12 schools open; perform repairs and program updates. Estimated cost: $176–257 million (includes $114 million for elementary work plus $62 million for middle/high schools). - Option B: Close Mount Pleasant and New Searles; redistribute students. Cost: $175–218 million. - Option C: Close Amherst and Mount Pleasant; build one new northern school. Cost: $211–284 million. - Option D: Close Amherst, Bicentennial, Mount Pleasant, and New Searles; build one northern and one southern school. Cost: $297–324 million. - Option E: Close Amherst, Charlotte, Fairgrounds, Ledge Street, and Mount Pleasant; build two new schools (northern + central). Cost: $276–313 million. - All options assume $62 million for middle/high school repairs; high‑school programmatic needs not yet fully assessed. - Cost Savings from Closures: Roughly $1.6–1.0 million per year per closed school (operational savings), but new construction and busing costs are not fully accounted for in these figures. C. Aldermanic Questions and Discussion - Alderman O’Brien asked about state bus‑ride duration limits, noting that longer busing could offset savings. Harriman acknowledged this is not yet studied. - Alderman Kelly clarified that the cost estimates for Option A cover 10 years of needed repairs, not ongoing lifecycle costs. - Alderman Morgan requested data on charter/private school enrollment trends and their impact on public school projections; Harriman said that was outside their scope. - Alderman Johnson compared the new study to a past redistricting study (by Mr. Preston) that had similar enrollment projections. He raised concern about preserving neighborhood schools but acknowledged some closures may be necessary. He also asked about “open concept” schools (Sunset still has open classrooms). - Alderman Lopez urged Harriman to consider citywide impacts (transportation costs) in future narrowing of options. He also asked about Harriman’s experience with new vs. renovation projects; they reported a 50‑50 split, noting new buildings “reset the clock” on maintenance. - Alderman Sullivan praised the objective data. He noted that the age‑of‑facilities slide had caused confusion (Birch Hill’s recent renovation should show a dot at zero years; Harriman clarified that dots represent the age of each renovation, not the original building). - Alderman Dowd pointed out that the condition data for Nashua High School South should reset to the same timeline as North because the building was essentially rebuilt. He also noted that New Searles recently received significant upgrades (fire alarm, power distribution, partial renovations) that should be reflected in the cost analysis. He raised the concern that closed schools (like Elm Street) still cost the city until repurposed, which is not included in the savings estimates. - Alderman Smith asked about technology costs and flexibility for future upgrades. Harriman said they plan for adaptable pathways and include current infrastructure costs, but cannot predict future technology. She also emphasized the need for special‑education spaces; Harriman confirmed each remaining school would have flexible special‑ed spaces as outlined in the educational specification. - Alderman Morgan (follow‑up) reiterated the need for an appendix with external data (charter/private schools). - Alderman Senate asked about the square footage of new builds; Harriman answered that new schools are designed for efficiency based on projected student numbers, typically 140–160 sq.ft. per elementary student. - Alderman Marvin asked about feasibility ranking of options and inclusion of transition costs for students (e.g., busing, community disruption). Harriman said these factors have not yet been incorporated but will be considered in next steps. - Alderman Kelly (second round) asked about modeling for state open‑enrollment legislation (tabled for 2026); Harriman said it is too uncertain to model. - Alderman Tebow noted the upcoming decision belongs to the Board of Education, but expressed concern that closing multiple schools would leave vacant buildings for the aldermen to manage (e.g., Elm Street still empty after two years). He supported having public comment on the agenda for all future meetings. - Alderman Dowd (final) corrected that Nashua High School South’s original building age should be reset because only one wall and staircases remain; Harriman agreed to update. - Alderman Smith (final) stressed the need to plan for future renovations from day one and to use closed schools for trade training or other community needs. Key Outcomes - Motion to allow public comment passed 7–4. Public comment was held at the end of the meeting; speakers included Board of Education members and residents. - Harriman Facility Study was presented; no vote was taken. The presentation is informational. Harriman will further narrow the options based on feedback and present a recommended long‑term option to the School Board. The Board of Education will make the final decision on facility changes. - Aldermen requested that Harriman provide: (a) a clearer, more readable copy of the slides; (b) data on transportation impacts, bus ride times, and state standards; (c) an appendix with external enrollment factors (charter/private schools); and (d) updated cost data for New Searles and Nashua High South to reflect recent investments. - Next Steps: The Board of Aldermen and Board of Education will continue joint discussions to align on budget priorities. The school board is expected to decide on a facility plan after considering community input and further analysis from Harriman.

The Nashua Planning Board met on June 5, 2026, to consider a conditional use permit for a tobacco shop relocation and two subdivision applications. All votes were unanimous. Consent Calendar - Approved minutes from the annual business meeting and regular meeting of January 9, 2025, without modification. - Staff provided updates on active cases: 11 Michelle Drive (updated plans and abutters correspondence), 3 Swartz Street (updated staff report), and Daniel Webster Highway (engineering letter received). Public Comments & Testimony - Conditional Use Permit (Daniel Webster Highway): No public testimony was offered. - Subdivision – 11 Michelle Drive: Dan Richardson (70 Berkeley Street) expressed concerns about potential blasting, questioned the adequacy of drawings, and raised issues about lot configuration and historic district compatibility. He asked whether the subdivision plan sufficiently accounted for future building. - Subdivision – 3 Swartz Street: Dan Richardson again spoke, questioning the orientation of the hypothetical future house (facing Swartz Street rather than Concord Street), the prevalence of overhead versus underground utilities, and the buildability of the smaller lot. He also inquired about the lot line placement and the ability to build a garage. Discussion Items - Conditional Use Permit (E25-0005) – 290-294 Daniel Webster Highway: Applicant Brian Garamillo requested approval to relocate an existing tobacco/vape shop from Unit 8 to Unit 6 in the same plaza. The business has operated since 2020 and the owner would remain the same. Two waivers were requested: (1) from the 1,000-foot separation requirement (the nearest similar business is approximately 750 feet away) and (2) from showing existing conditions on adjacent properties. The board noted the relocation is only about 40 feet and the business is pre-existing. Both waivers and the conditional use permit were approved unanimously, with a condition to obtain an updated sewer permit before certificate of occupancy. - Subdivision (A24-026) – 11 Michelle Drive: Attorney Elizabeth Hardigan presented a two-lot subdivision of a large lot. Three waivers were requested: not showing existing conditions within 1,000 feet, no lighting plan (no changes proposed), and no underground utilities (existing overhead utilities). The board discussed abutter concerns about blasting; Mr. Varley noted that any future blasting would require separate permits and compliance with city ordinances. Staff confirmed that engineering comments were resolved. The waivers and subdivision were approved unanimously with 13 conditions. - Subdivision (A24-027) – 3 Swartz Street: Earl Blatchford presented a two-lot subdivision of a 1.365-acre lot at the corner of Concord and Swartz streets. The applicant had obtained a use variance and special exception from the zoning board for an accessory structure (garage and shed) that would become a principal structure on one lot. Three waivers similar to the previous case were requested. The board discussed future driveway access, the historic district, and the potential for hardship. The waivers and subdivision were approved unanimously with 12 conditions. Key Outcomes - Conditional Use Permit (E25-0005): Approved unanimously (8-0) with a condition to obtain a new sewer permit prior to certificate of occupancy. - Subdivision (A24-026): Approved unanimously (8-0) with 13 conditions. - Subdivision (A24-027): Approved unanimously (8-0) with 12 conditions. - Regional Impact Determination: No projects of regional significance were identified; the board unanimously concurred. - Meeting adjourned at 8:11 PM.

The Joint Committee of the Nashua Board of Aldermen and Police Commission met on June 4, 2026, to review the final completion of the Nine Riverside project, approve invoices, and discuss future payment procedures. The meeting included a progress update from the project manager, approval of multiple invoices, and new contracts for fleet bay drain repairs. Discussion Items - Invoice Payment Process: Administrative Services Director Tim Cummings proposed a pathway for paying upcoming invoices without requiring a full meeting each time. He suggested that the chair could authorize payments under $50,000 per invoice, with notification to the board, and then a future meeting to ratify all payments. Alderman Doubt clarified that state law allows such administrative approval only to avoid project delays, and that all payments must eventually be codified by the board. After discussion, the committee agreed to the plan: the chair will sign off on invoices under $50,000, notify members via email, and a future joint meeting will ratify the payments. Alderman Johnson raised a question about cumulative totals exceeding $50,000, and it was confirmed that the limit applies per invoice, not cumulatively. - Progress Update: Tim Lemire from GPI provided a project update. Construction under the GMP contract with Whiting Turner is complete, with the final invoice of $2,425.92 presented for approval. The police department now occupies the new garage and training spaces at Nine Riverside. Ancillary projects are nearly complete: security surveillance, vehicle lifts, IT server, flooring for firearms training, phone system, and HVAC for the server room. The parking lot site civil design is in progress. The project came in under budget, saving approximately $218,000 from the original GMP of $2,351,000. Overall authorized budget is $3.5 million, with $3.4 million budgeted through construction and $2.44 million spent to date. - New Contract Proposals: Tim Lemire presented three interconnected contracts for fleet bay vehicle drain repairs, needed to address clogged drains and prepare for the site civil project. The contracts are with Home Depot ($2,194.68), Merrimack Valley Floor ($902.35), and Raoul Services ($33,280), totaling $36,377.03. The police department will perform some in-house work to save funds. Key Outcomes - Approval of Minutes: The minutes of the February 11, 2026 meeting were approved by voice vote (all in favor). - Approval of Invoices - All Approved Unanimously: - Whiting Turner (February 28, 2026) - $2,425.92 - Room Alert (November 17, 2025) - $2,867.50 - Amazon (February 26, 2026) - $1,080.65; (March 2, 2026) - $1,466.00 - ARI Phoenix (February 17, 2026) - $54,973.36 - Carpet Center Corp (March 3, 2026) - $2,686.00 - Dell Technologies (January 5, 2026) - $26,328.56; (December 4, 2025) - $47,547.36 - Lavallee/Bresend Architects (January 12, 2026) - $5,093.50; (February 13, 2026) - $1,489.25 - TCS Phone System (April 1, 2026) - $139,162.83; (April 1, 2026) - $36,260.37 - VHB Inc. (April 1, 2025) - $8,578.87; (February 24, 2026) - $4,955.00; (January 30, 2026) - $17,723.00; (December 28, 2025) - $3,215.00 - GPI (February 17, 2026) - $1,747.94; (March 16, 2026) - $2,522.35; (April 13, 2026) - $2,189.70; (May 11, 2026) - $234.00 - Approval of New Contracts - All Approved Unanimously: Home Depot ($2,194.68), Merrimack Valley Floor ($902.35), and Raoul Services ($33,280). - Administrative Payment Authority: The committee agreed to allow the chair to authorize payments under $50,000 per invoice, with notification to members, and a future meeting to ratify all payments. - Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 6:25 PM.

The Finance Committee of Nashua, New Hampshire, met on June 4, 2026 (the meeting was called to order on June 3, 2026, per the transcript, but the provided date is June 4, 2026). The committee reviewed and approved a series of purchasing contracts, change orders, and a resolution authorizing transit service agreements. All items were passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 7:53 p.m. Consent Calendar - Purchase of replacement parts for Gillig bus fleet – $70,000 from the Transportation Fund. Matt Sullivan (Community Development Director) explained the aging fleet (average age 6 years, expected life 9–11 years) requires OEM parts. The aggregate authorization exceeds $25,000, necessitating committee approval. Passed. - Purchase of 28 SWAT body armor vests – $98,228.81 from Homeland Security SWAT grant and general fund. Lt. Mike Lang noted the vests (last purchased 2015, 5-year warranty) are overdue for replacement. Passed. - Purchase of 4 night vision binoculars – $29,729 from Homeland Security grant. Lt. Lang explained the need to upgrade from monocular to dual-tube systems for better depth perception during extended missions, using a combination of conversions and new units. Passed. - Purchase and installation of mobile wireless routers for fire department – $39,844.93 from Fire Rescue Fund. Asst. Chief Adam Plea stated the upgrade from 2011-era MDTs to iPads with 300-foot range improves on-scene functionality. Passed. - Roof replacement at Fire Station 3 and repair at Station 2 – $552,795.37 (including $50,000 contingency) from Fire Rescue Fund Bond. Asst. Chief Plea detailed full replacement at 38 Lake Street (asphalt shingles and rubber membrane) and partial repair at Spitbrook Road (asbestos abatement needed). Passed. - Landfill perimeter litter fence construction – $278,250 from Solid Waste Fund Bond. Superintendent Jeff LaFleur stated DES requires the fence for Phase 4 landfill. Passed. - Change order 1 for SCADA telemetry panel on Phase 4 landfill leachate pump house – $58,586.32 from Solid Waste Fund Bond. LaFleur explained this will unify landfill monitoring into a cloud-based system. Passed. - Change order 5 for Phase 4 landfill construction – $98,786.28 from Solid Waste Fund Bond. LaFleur noted 90% of the cost is due to DES approval delays; expects Phase 4 to open by early July/August 2026. Passed. - 2026 Pavement Preservation Program – $894,875 from Admin Engineering Fund Bond. City Engineer Dan Hudson stated the program covers 60 miles of crack sealing and microsurfacing to extend road life. Passed. - Change order 7 for sewer replacement project – $1,000,000 from Admin Engineering Fund Bond. Hudson explained the contract with Crisp Contracting allows quick response to emergency sewer repairs; the fifth amendment brings total to $1M. Passed. - Change order 1 for 2026 paving program – $350,000 from Streets and Wastewater funds. Hudson detailed sidewalk and drainage improvements at Ledge Street School (including rapid-flashing beacons and drainage fixes). Passed. - Purchase of 12 traffic signal controllers – $35,400 from Amherst Street Traffic Mitigation funds. Hudson noted a 40% discount on controllers for the Amherst Street corridor, funded by developer mitigation fees, not city general funds. Passed. - Reconstruction of Greeley Park wading pool – $298,200 from Parks Fund Bond. Superintendent Brian Conant stated the pool (1950s construction) leaks excessively; Weston & Sampson was low bid and has relevant experience. Passed. - Installation of drop ceilings at wastewater treatment facility – $32,812.50 from Wastewater Fund. Superintendent Dave Boucher said the project includes new LED and emergency lights in five areas of the administration building. Passed. Public Comments & Testimony - Michelle Mells (Litchfield resident, 32-year teacher at Ledge Street School, chair of PTO Playground Committee) thanked the city for addressing flooding at Memorial Park, which impacts the school playground. She noted the PTO is fundraising for playground improvements and expressed optimism about the next steps. No vote taken. Discussion Items - Resolution R26033 – Transit Service Contracts – Matt Sullivan presented five contracts: (1) UPass agreements with Rivier University and Nashua Community College (fixed-route bus access for students, no cost increase, but ridership rise increased not-to-exceed amounts by $2,000 and $3,000); (2) Paratransit contracts with Town of Hudson, Town of Merrimack, and Souhegan Valley Transit Collaborative (SVTC). Hourly rates increased by $3 for Hudson and Merrimack; SVTC rate is $8,042 due to longer distances. The contracts generate approximately $300,000 in annual revenue. Passed. - Record of Expenditures – Period May 15–28, 2026. Approved as compliant with charter. Key Outcomes - All 14 purchasing items and the resolution were approved unanimously. - The committee removed R26033 from the table and recommended final passage. - The record of expenditures was approved. - General discussion included Alderwoman Clee urging support for the Ledge Street playground and clarifying that the 8% figure on tax bills refers to late-payment interest, not an overall rate increase.

The Budget Review Committee met on June 3, 2026 (the meeting was called to order on June 2, 2026 at 7:00 p.m. and adjourned at 8:36 p.m.) to consider the proposed FY2027 city budget. The committee reviewed the Economic Development budget, discussed the creation of a new Office of Strategic Communications, and examined corrections to the budget via the goldenrod copy. The committee voted to table the budget (docket 26-028) for further discussion. Discussion Items Economic Development Budget (Director Liz Hanum) - Director Hanum presented the economic development budget, noting that the main change is the addition of a marketing and public relations line item for a business recruitment plan. The budget is proposed to be level-funded from the current year, with corrections to restore a $129,000 line item (originally zeroed out) in the goldenrod copy. - The business recruitment strategy will be informed by a skills gap analysis (nearly complete, three-month study) and will target small industries (25 or fewer employees) due to limited land availability. Downtown will receive specific focus to attract foot traffic. - Other funds support "Activate Nashua" programming, real estate development, and consulting services ($25,000 level funded). The consulting services line will be used for a business recruitment strategy and marketing collateral. - Questions from committee members: Alderman Kelly asked about spending; Director Hanum noted that $30,000 was spent on barriers (now handled by DPW), $2,500 on duck materials (Make It Labs donated labor), and other items. Alderman Senat asked about the timeline for the skills gap analysis; it is expected to be presented to PEDC shortly. Alderman Sullivan asked about citywide recruitment; Director Hanum confirmed it is citywide. Alderman Johnson raised concerns about the Broad Street Parkway area and the need for skilled jobs. The discussion also included the small business revolving loan fund and the financial empowerment center (RFP received no responses). Proposed Office of Strategic Communications (Chief of Staff Megan Carron) - Megan Carron presented a proposal for a new Department of Strategic Communications with a budget of $122,211 (reduced to $87,211 in the goldenrod copy due to a $30,000 salary reduction, funding a half-year position at $50,000). The office would start with one Strategic Communications Manager to develop and implement a master communications plan. - The goal is to centralize communications currently dispersed across departments (DPW, public health, mayor's office, transit) to improve consistency and effectiveness. The position would not replace existing communications specialists but coordinate them. - Committee members debated the proposal. Alderman Sullivan questioned the priority given the school district's budget cuts. Alderman Johnson expressed concern about new positions while unaffiliated employee raises were revoked. Alderman Kelly and Alderman Johnson suggested a communications audit/plan by a consultant before hiring, to avoid creating another isolated position. Alderman Thibault noted the city's communications are poor and a single person is a start, but the timing is uncertain. Director Carron offered to research the cost of an audit and propose an alternative amendment. Goldenrod Copy Amendments (CFO Don Enright) - Don Enright explained the goldenrod copy corrections, which include $111,000 in general fund corrections (keying errors, process oversights, software upload errors) and a $177,500 decrease due to the decision not to purchase 14 Mulberry Street for a resource center. Total general fund decrease of $288,000. Additionally, a missed bond payment in the wastewater fund was adjusted. - The corrections also restore the $129,000 economic development line item and adjust the Strategic Communications salary to half-year funding. - Committee members expressed frustration with the number of errors and the confusion caused by multiple versions. Alderman Senat noted inconsistencies (e.g., salary cuts without corresponding benefit adjustments). Alderman Thibault suggested sending the budget back if such errors occur. Alderman Kelly and Alderman Senat asked for department heads to be present at the wrap-up session to answer questions. Key Outcomes - Motion to table the budget (docket 26-028): Alderman Thibault made a motion to remove the budget from the table, which passed unanimously. After presentations, a motion to table the budget again was made and carried (no opposition noted). The budget is tabled to the next meeting. - No votes on specific items: The committee did not vote on the economic development budget or the Office of Strategic Communications; these will be considered at the wrap-up session. - Future actions: Director Carron will research the cost of a communications audit/plan and propose an alternative amendment. The committee requested a clear explanation of the unaffiliated employee raise (ordinance 25-063) and its fiscal impact, to be distributed to the entire board. - Wrap-up session: Scheduled for later in June, with department heads present to answer questions on the goldenrod copy changes. Note: The meeting was adjourned at 8:36 p.m.

The Board of Aldermen met on June 2, 2026, at approximately 6:30 PM, with Chairwoman Soshana Kelly presiding. The meeting included public comments, an interview for a Board of Health appointment, discussion of several resolutions and ordinances, and final votes on multiple items. The session adjourned at 9:10 PM. Public Comments & Testimony - Laurie Ordlano (Nashua) commented on the single candidate for the Board of Health, supported restricting electronic device use during meetings (but noted concerns about virtual participants voting without attending non‑public sessions), and criticized board attendance, stating that attendance at special meetings should count toward compensation requirements. - Katie (Hooksett, store on 100 Main Street) spoke on behalf of secondhand dealers, stating that the current 30‑day holding period makes it impossible to operate and that the hobbyist community supports revised regulations; she also noted that stores already keep detailed records of purchases and cooperate with police. - Laurie Ordlano (second appearance) questioned the status of the Ethics Committee, specifically the non‑renewal of Chair Tim Bush and the reappointment of another member, and expressed concerns about transparency and gender bias in committee proceedings. Interviews & Appointments - Board of Health – Social Worker Position: Christian Jimenez (licensed social worker, 12 years’ experience) was interviewed. He described his work in forensic social work, case management, and community involvement. Questions addressed his perspective on public health. No other candidates applied. - Motion to Recommend Appointment: A motion to recommend Christian Jimenez (term expiring December 31, 2027) and to reappoint Stephanie Valentine (Greeley Park Advisory Committee, term expiring June 13, 2029) passed on a roll‑call vote of 3 ayes, 1 abstention (Alderman Lopez abstained citing a workplace conflict), and 1 no (Alderman Johnson). The abstention was recorded due to a conflict with the candidate’s employer. - Arts Commission Interview: Scheduled interview was postponed as the candidate was not present; rescheduled for a later date. Discussion Items – Resolutions - R‑26‑036 – CPACER Program (Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy & Resiliency): Energy Manager Doria Brown presented, explaining that the program is funded by private lenders, not the city, and allows commercial property owners to finance energy efficiency and resiliency improvements through a voluntary property assessment lien that transfers with ownership. The city’s role is to opt into the state program and review projects. Alderman Johnson requested success/failure data from other states. The motion to recommend final passage passed 4‑1 (Johnson voting no; Lopez, Thibault, Clemens, Kelly voting yes). Discussion Items – Ordinances - O‑26‑007 – Medical Insurance Opt‑Out Stipend (Unaffiliated Employees): Administrative Services Director Tim Cummings (participating remotely) explained the stipend incentivizes employees to waive city health coverage by offering payments for single, two‑person, and family plans; employees must have three years of prior coverage. He projected 3–5% participation initially. The motion passed 3‑2 (Lopez and Johnson voting no; Thibault, Clemens, Kelly voting yes). - O‑26‑010 – Use of Electronic Devices During Meetings: Sponsored by Alderman Johnson, the ordinance proposed restrictions on phone/texting during meetings. Several aldermen spoke against it, noting that phones and tablets are used for legitimate work (e.g., accessing meeting materials, looking up information, receiving family emergencies) and that enforcement would be impractical. The motion to recommend final passage failed 1‑4 (Johnson yes; Lopez, Thibault, Clemens, Kelly no). A subsequent motion to indefinitely postpone passed 4‑1 (Johnson no). - O‑26‑011 – Virtual Meeting Participation (Camera Requirement): The ordinance would require remote participants to keep cameras on. Opponents cited bandwidth issues, connectivity problems (as demonstrated by Director Cummings), personal privacy during illness or crisis, and a preference for hearing over seeing. The motion to recommend final passage failed 1‑4, and indefinite postponement passed 4‑1. - O‑26‑012 – Amending Definition of Secondhand Dealers: Alderman Senate presented, stating the ordinance exempts coin dealers, trading card shops, and collectibles dealers from the 30‑day holding period and secondhand dealer classification. He noted similar legislation had stalled in 2021. Proponents argued the 30‑day rule is outdated for non‑serialized goods and that shops already keep records and cooperate with police. Alderman Clemens expressed concern about losing documentation requirements and suggested a middle ground, but no amendment was offered. The motion to recommend final passage passed 4‑1 (Clemens no). - O‑26‑014 – Board of Aldermen Compensation (Attendance Requirements): Sponsored by Alderman Johnson, the ordinance would expand absentee triggers to include committee and special meetings (combined three absences per quarter would forfeit the stipend). Opponents argued that the current system (three regular meetings missed) is sufficient, that work outside meetings (newsletters, constituent service) is also valuable, and that extenuating circumstances are better handled case‑by‑case. The motion to recommend final passage failed 1‑4, and indefinite postponement passed 4‑1. - O‑26‑002 (Attempt to Remove from Table): Alderman Johnson attempted to bring this ordinance (related to ADA/Zoom participation) off the table, but after brief discussion she withdrew the motion, agreeing to defer to the next meeting to allow review of new federal documents. Key Outcomes - Appointments: Christian Jimenez (Board of Health) and Stephanie Valentine (Greeley Park Advisory Committee) recommended for approval. - R‑26‑036 (CPACER): Recommended for final passage (4‑1). - O‑26‑007 (Insurance Opt‑Out): Recommended for final passage (3‑2). - O‑26‑010 (Electronic Devices): Indefinitely postponed (4‑1). - O‑26‑011 (Camera Requirement): Indefinitely postponed (4‑1). - O‑26‑012 (Secondhand Dealers): Recommended for final passage (4‑1). - O‑26‑014 (Compensation Attendance): Indefinitely postponed (4‑1). All recommendations will be forwarded to the full Board of Aldermen for final action.

The Nashua Board of Aldermen Committee met on June 1, 2026, at approximately 6:00 PM. Four members were present at roll call, with a fifth arriving later. The meeting addressed tax deed waivers for delinquent properties and a traffic calming measure on Middle Dunstable Road. The committee voted to recommend final passage of the tax deed waiver resolution as amended, and voted to send a negative recommendation on removing traffic calming measures to the full Board. Consent Calendar - No items were listed on a consent calendar; routine approvals were not separately identified. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public spoke during either public comment period. Discussion Items - Tax Deed Waivers (R26-037): The committee considered a resolution authorizing waivers for certain tax-deeded properties. Diane Mulholland, Treasurer/Tax Collector, presented an overview of the tax deed process. She explained that under RSA 80:76, the city may refuse to accept a tax deed when properties pose liability, environmental impairment, or other public interest risks. Since fiscal year 2024, the city has waived 64 properties (FY24), 51 (FY25), and is now requesting waiver of 102 properties from the 2023 tax levy year. The increase is due to many small, unpaid parcels. The city encourages taxpayers in arrears to contact the tax department early for assistance. Alderman Paula Johnson asked for clarification about the difference between the properties being waived and those being taken. CFO Don Enright confirmed that the waivers are for properties the city is not taking. The committee then voted to amend the resolution with an updated waiver exhibit A and subsequently recommended final passage as amended. - Traffic Calming on Middle Dunstable Road (Item 02608): The committee took up a tabled ordinance to remove certain traffic calming measures on a portion of Middle Dunstable Road. The Department of Public Works (DPW) had submitted a letter indicating they would reevaluate speed bump locations using new, smoother standards when the road is repaved. The committee discussed that the recommendation was to keep the status quo and not remove the existing measures. Alderman Downs noted that DPW would bring a new proposal after paving. The committee voted to send the item to the full Board with a negative recommendation (i.e., against removal). Alderman Johnson initially voted in favor but then reversed her vote. Key Outcomes - Motion to Amend R26-037 (Tax Deed Waivers): Passed unanimously (voice vote). - Motion to Recommend Final Passage of R26-037 as Amended: Passed unanimously (voice vote). - Motion to Remove from Table Item 02608 (Traffic Calming): Passed (voice vote). - Motion to Send Item 02608 to Full Board with a Negative Recommendation: Passed (voice vote). The negative recommendation means the committee advises against removing the traffic calming measures, maintaining the current status. - Meeting Adjourned: At approximately 6:44 PM, upon motion by Alderman Smith.

The Nashua Board of Public Works held a regular meeting on May 28, 2026, at 4:00 PM (presumed) to 5:32 PM, addressing a wide range of city infrastructure, parks, and operational matters. The meeting included public comments, discussion of speed humps on Middle Dunstable Road, approval of numerous contracts and change orders, a decision on a sculpture relocation, creation of a Holman Stadium activation committee, and a non-public session for personnel matters. All votes were unanimous unless noted. Public Comments & Testimony - Patrick Como (18 Middle Dunstable Road, 20-year resident) expressed strong support for retaining the speed bumps on his street, citing safety for children, a school zone, and a walkway to Bicentennial. He argued that the $7,000 annual cost (or $700/year) is a small price compared to a child's life, and dismissed DPW truck damage concerns as a matter of driver responsibility. He urged the board not to remove them. - David Tiller (15 Middle Dunstable Road) supported keeping the speed bumps and added that a dangerous blind curve exists between the current bumps, suggesting that one bump be moved strategically to address that issue. Discussion Items - Speed Humps on Middle Dunstable Road (Referral from Board of Aldermen): City Engineer Dan Hudson explained that the aldermen received a resident complaint requesting removal of the speed humps, which were installed over 20 years ago. Public Works generally opposes speed humps due to maintenance complications, but did not take a strong position on removal. The street is scheduled for paving this year, making the discussion timely. The Infrastructure Committee (Alderman, name not specified) reported overwhelming neighborhood support for keeping the humps and recommended leaving the status quo, noting the street is the only one in the city with such treatment. Commissioner Gregg moved to recommend doing nothing now but conducting a full study of alternatives on the street, with stakeholder involvement. The motion passed (voice vote) and the board accepted the recommendation. - Greeley Park Wading Pool Replacement: Parks Superintendent Brian Conant presented a contract award to Weston and Sampson for $298,200 to replace the heavily used waiting pool, which was shut down in 2025 due to leakage. The new pool will be similar in size and depth, including decking, plumbing, and a filtration system. The pool is expected to be operational for the 2027 season. Approved. - Wastewater Contracts: - Three-year biosolids management contract with Waste Management of New Hampshire for up to $3,894,445. The superintendent noted the city is exploring alternative options, potentially shortening the contract. Approved. - Drop ceiling installation at the wastewater treatment facility by Trusted Maintenance Solutions for $32,812.50. Approved. - FY27 polymer purchase from Polydyne for $650,000 (pending budget approval). Approved. - Solid Waste Contracts: - Litter fence construction on Phase 4 landfill by Charter Contracting for $278,250. Approved. - Change order 5 for Phase 4 landfill construction: $98,786.28. Approved. - Change order 1 for SCADA telemetry panel at Phase 4 leachate pump house: $58,586.32. Approved. - Engineering Contracts: - Change order 7 for 2025 Sewer Replacement Project (Contract 1) with CRISP Contracting: $1,000,000 to extend on-call sewer repair services through summer 2026. Approved. - 2026 Pavement Preservation Program contract to Seal Coating Inc. (dba Indice) for $894,875. Approved. - Change order 1 for 2026 Paving Program (Contract 2) with Sunshine Paving: $350,000 for sidewalk and drainage work on Ledge Street, including rapid flashing beacons near the school. Funding from separate sidewalk and drainage funds. Approved. - Purchase of 12 UNEX traffic signal controllers from Ocean State Signal for $35,400 (40% discount), to upgrade Amherst Street corridor. Approved. - Amendment 3 to engineering services agreement for East Hollis and Bridge Street intersection project with McFarland Johnson: $50,000 to finalize design. Approved. - Sculpture Relocation (Lovewell Pond to Mine Falls Park): The Conservation Commission requested moving a sculpture from Lovewell Pond (within the wetland buffer) to Mine Falls Park. After discussion, the board voted to decline the move, citing the sculpture's popularity, prior approval, and concerns about precedent. The motion passed (voice vote). - Sculpture Installation at Udiki Farms: The International Sculpture Symposium proposed installing a large 14-foot granite sculpture (two pieces weighing 8,200 lbs each) at Udiki Farms. The board approved the placement subject to approval from a structural engineer to ensure safety. Approved. - Sound System at Renaissance Park: Economic Development Director Liz Hanum requested approval to install a permanent sound system (six speakers on light poles, plus speakers on the pavilion) for $36,000, to support events such as the farmers market and a new Saturday night music series. The system was tested during the Renaissance on the Riverfront event. Approved. - Holman Stadium Activation Committee: Commissioner Shea and Alderman Morgan proposed forming a committee to explore activating Holman Stadium for more events (e.g., movies, winter festivals, concerts). The board approved the creation of a committee with the following members: Commissioner Shea (chair), Alderman Morgan (vice chair), Commissioner Lemon, Commissioner Speedia, Director Hanum, Brian Conant, Matt LeBlanc, Grant Morris, and Alyssa O'Mara. The committee will meet publicly and report back to the Board of Public Works. Approved. Key Outcomes - Speed humps on Middle Dunstable Road will remain pending a study of alternatives; the street paving will incorporate potential adjustments to hump placement. - Contracts awarded: Greeley Park wading pool ($298,200), biosolids management ($3,894,445), drop ceilings ($32,812.50), polymer ($650,000), litter fence ($278,250), pavement preservation ($894,875), traffic signal controllers ($35,400), and engineering amendment ($50,000). - Change orders approved: Phase 4 landfill ($98,786.28 and $58,586.32), sewer replacement ($1,000,000), paving program ($350,000). - Sculpture relocation from Lovewell Pond declined; sculpture at Udiki Farms approved subject to structural engineer review. - Permanent sound system approved for Renaissance Park. - Holman Stadium committee formed with 9 members to develop event programming. - Personnel: Resignation of Kevin Narrow (Solid Waste Foreman) accepted; non-public minutes from April 21, 2026, unsealed. - Non-public session held at 5:32 PM to discuss hiring of a public employee, with minutes sealed.