Public Meetings - Newport, Rhode Island

The Historic District Commission (HDC) held its regular meeting on Tuesday, March 10, 2026, at 11:30 AM. The commission addressed several applications for historic properties, including approvals, continuations, and split decisions. Key actions included approving a redesigned carriage house on Green Isle Place, a front door replacement on Franklin Street, window replacements on Bellevue Avenue, and a new garage on Cottage Street, while continuing discussion on dormers, window relocations, and a pool. Consent Calendar - Approved the minutes of the February 10, 2026 HDC meeting as presented. - Accepted all staff findings of fact as the commission’s findings. - Granted summary approval for 18 Barney Court (3 & 4 Barney Court) – permission to alter as presented, citing Newport Standard 17 TAC 80 060 A1-5,7. - Granted abbreviated summary for 27 K Street – permission to infill a bathroom window with a ghost profile, conditional on the rear window being infilled with a ghost profile, citing the same standards. - Redirected application C2 (97 Harrison Av unit PL) to the preservation planner. Discussion Items 6 Green Isle Place (Carriage House) – Applicant Kiko Sanchez presented a revised plan to demolish a shed roof addition and construct a one-and-a-half-story addition, rotate the carriage house, install carriage-style doors, and replace the roof. The commission unanimously approved the application as presented, citing Newport Standard 17 TAC 80 060 A1-7. 27½ Franklin Street – Applicant Shane Cooper and Brian Shoel proposed a rear shed dormer, front door replacement, window changes, and had withdrawn HVAC and sign requests. The commission split the application: - Approved the front door replacement (unanimous). - Approved restoration of existing windows as detailed in the window inventory. - Continued the dormer and any window relocations to the April 14, 2026 HDC meeting, as the dormer lacked support (5-2 against as presented) and window relocation remained unresolved. 364 Bellevue Avenue (Unit 301S) – Applicant Ronald Polito sought to replace 12 windows and one round window. The commission approved the application with a condition that the two original round windows be restored (vote: 6 in favor, 1 opposed – Commissioner Bala dissented citing standards A1 and A4). 6 Sunshine Court – Applicant Brian Shoel proposed replacing front entry stairs, vinyl windows with Pella SDL wood windows, and skylights. Approved with a condition that the new post caps be updated to a spherical design matching historic photos (unanimous). 38 Pelham Street (Rear Addition) – Applicant Jay Russell Jackson and Chris Fagan requested permission to demolish and rebuild structurally unsound rear additions. The commission split the application: - Approved the east elevation reconstruction as presented (unanimous). - Continued the west elevation (L-shaped addition) to April 14, 2026, with a potential site visit to assess salvageable portions. 1 Cottage Street – Applicant Jay Russell Jackson and Chris Fagan proposed a garage, pool, and chimney removal. The commission split the application: - Approved the garage and chimney removal/reconstruction, conditional on using a carriage-style garage door (unanimous). - Continued the in-ground pool to April 14, 2026, with a request for 3D renderings to assess visibility from Cottage Street. Key Outcomes - Approved applications: 6 Green Isle Place, front door at 27½ Franklin Street, 364 Bellevue Avenue (with condition), 6 Sunshine Court (with condition), east elevation at 38 Pelham Street, and garage/chimney at 1 Cottage Street (with condition). - Continued applications (to April 14, 2026): 5 Sunshine Court (N1), 719 Bellevue Avenue (N8), C330 Poplar Street, dormer and window relocations at 27½ Franklin Street, west elevation at 38 Pelham Street, and pool at 1 Cottage Street. - Recommendations for design review: The 27½ Franklin Street dormer and window issues were noted as suitable for a design review committee to refine the proposal. - Site visit planned: Preservation planner and possibly the commission will visit 38 Pelham Street to evaluate the L-shaped addition before the next hearing.

The Newport City Council met on March 5, 2026, beginning with a Black History Month proclamation and citations to community leaders. The bulk of the meeting was a public hearing on proposed zoning ordinance changes affecting short-term rentals (guest houses) in commercial zones, followed by votes on first-reading amendments, licensing, grant awards, and other city business. Ceremonial Opening: Black History Month Proclamation & Citations - Mayor Charles Holder and Councilor Pinnock presented a proclamation declaring February 2026 as Black History Month, marking 100 years of national commemorations. - Citations were awarded to: Gianna Michelle (youth leader), Letitia Michelle (perinatal doula), former Councilor Angela Lima, Barbara Jenkins (Pyramid Club steward), Sierra Jones (entrepreneur), Marlon DeCruz (Boys & Girls Club mentor), Cheryl Robinson (community volunteer, accepted by Hakeem Cogan), Barbara Winters (housing advocate), Officer Mary Scott (police officer), Fern Lima (civil rights advocate), Veronica Borges (human services), and Pauline Moye Perkins (human services leader). Ms. Perkins received a Key to the City in recognition of her decades of service. Consent Calendar - The council approved the consent calendar in its entirety, including routine items and prior votes, after the public hearing and zoning ordinance discussions. Public Comments & Testimony - Mitchell Edwards (attorney for RI Short-Term Rental Association) argued the proposed parking requirements and on-site manager rule constitute a “constructive ban” on new short-term rentals, harming tourism and property rights. He urged prospective language to protect existing operators. - Nicholas DeRosa (Ames Street, operator) requested clear language that the changes apply only to new developments, warning of legal challenges if not transparent. - Marielle Claire (George Street, 6th generation Newporter) opposed restricting STRs in commercial zones, stating it would not create affordable housing but would push properties to second homes. She asked the council to consider local small businesses. - Aaron Turan (Salve Regina student) argued STRs keep rental prices lower during off-peak months (Sept–May) and provide affordable housing for students; she opposed the parking changes. - Lynn Sanzo (Spring Street) supported the changes, citing noise and parking spillover from STRs into residential areas. - Shane Cooper (Woodhaven Road) opposed the ban, emphasizing property rights and suggesting a parking garage at the Mary Street lot instead of restricting STRs. - Tina Brownell (lifelong resident, teacher, STR operator) urged data-driven decisions, noting the city lacks enforcement on parking violations and that STRs help locals afford to stay in Newport. - Breta McBride (Airbnb policy manager) noted the state’s new occupancy tax (effective Jan 2026) earmarks 50% for housing funds—changes could reduce projected $500K+ in annual revenue for Newport. - Several other residents (Linda Pereira, Barbara Winters, others) expressed concern that the rules would harm local families who rely on STR income. Discussion Items Zoning Ordinance Amendments – First Reading (Item 1) The council considered four sub-items recommended by the Planning Board: - A. Planning Board Recommendation – Approved unanimously (voice vote). - B. Parking Changes (Ch. 17.04 & 17.104) – Zoning Officer Nick Armor explained that new guest house conversions must provide all parking on-site (no credit for prior use) and clarified that on-site manager parking would not be double-counted. After debate, the council voted 4–3 to approve the changes in Ch. 17.04. The corresponding amendment in Ch. 17.104 also passed. - C. Definitional Changes (Ch. 17.08) – Proposed to require on-site managers to live in a long-term residential unit and prohibit converting ground-floor commercial space into STRs. Amendment by Mayor Charles Holder (supported 5–2) removed the phrase “within a long-term residential dwelling unit” from the on-site manager requirement. A second amendment to separate the ground-floor commercial ban failed. The definitional section as amended passed. - D. Special Use Permit Changes (Ch. 17.14, 17.56, 17.60) – Would require special use permits for guest houses in Waterfront Business (WB) and General Business (GB) zones, effectively imposing on-site manager and full parking requirements. Defeated on a show of hands (no count recorded, but chair stated “All is opposed”). Residential Parking Classification (Item 6566) – Councilor Segley moved to continue the item due to late hour and lack of review. Motion passed, with direction to schedule a special meeting before March 25 to allow time for implementation before peak season. Other Discussion Items: - Civic Support/Services Grant Awards (Items 6563) – Council split the vote: items funded by Sears Trust (1–18 except recused items) passed unanimously. Items 19–30 (taxpayer-funded) were continued pending review of the FY27 budget (motion passed). - Capital Improvement Program (Item 6565) – Adopted in concept for FY27–31, 5–2 (Councilors Carlin and O’Connell opposed, citing tax increase concerns). - Extension of Strategic Plan Agreement (Item 6561) – Approved (not to exceed $6,500). - Amendment to Holiday Selling Ordinance (Item 6562) – Approved (state law repealed). - Mooring Permit Classification (second reading) – Approved. - Resolutions: Speed camera revenue fund continued; resolution opposing Governor McKee’s cruise ship fee increase passed unanimously. Key Outcomes - Zoning Changes (first reading): Parking and definitional changes passed 4–3 and 5–2 respectively; special use permit changes failed. Second reading scheduled for March 11, 2026. - Prospective Language: Council approved that changes apply only to new STRs, not existing ones. - Civic Grant Awards: Continued for taxpayer-funded portion; Sears-funded items approved. - Residential Parking Ordinance: Continued to a special meeting before March 25. - Cruise Ship Fee Resolution: Passed unanimously. - Capital Improvement Program: Adopted 5–2. - Licenses: Multiple food truck and vittling licenses approved, including Ocean & Fifth and others.

A public meeting hosted by the City of Newport and engineering firm Fuss & O'Neill was held on March 5, 2026, to present the proposed dam improvements for Easton's Pond (North and South Pond), which are critical to the city's drinking water supply. The meeting included a presentation on the engineering design, climate resilience, and potential public access enhancements, followed by breakout stations for detailed questions and feedback. No formal votes were taken. Presentation Overview - Drinking Water Supply Importance: Easton's Pond provides on average 2.2 million gallons per day, serving 22,000–28,000 people. The dams were originally constructed in 1891 and are aging. - Climate Risks: Increased coastal storm surge, inland flooding, and saltwater intrusion pose risks. A 2007 storm required emergency sandbagging by the Navy to prevent dam overtopping. - Proposed Engineering Improvements: - Raising and armoring embankments (completing a 2014 phase one project). - Reconstructing the spillway with a variable gate to allow water level manipulation (lowering before inland storms, closing during coastal storms). - Installing a tidal gate near Braga Park to prevent saltwater intrusion into North Pond. - Cost Estimate: $45 million all-in (with a range for inflation/unforeseen factors). The city is pursuing a diversified funding strategy. - Public Access Opportunities: Potential improvements include a boardwalk along the moat, streetscape upgrades on Old Beach Road, safer pedestrian crossing at Memorial Boulevard, and connections to Dunlap Wheeler Park and Middletown. Public Comments & Testimony - Question about springs: A resident asked whether a study had been done on the amount of spring water entering the pond. The city responded that no such study exists, but past pipe abandonment reduced water loss. - Question about storm preparation: A resident asked about existing structures to lower the pond level before storms. The city explained that the new gate design will provide much more flexibility than the current system. - Question about floodplain capacity: A resident expressed concern that filling an old sedimentation pond may have reduced floodwater capacity, worsening inland flooding. The city stated that the modeling is very detailed (2D, sensitive to hundredths of a foot) and that they must demonstrate no detrimental impact on flood elevations. - Question about ecological studies: A resident asked if an environmental scientist or biologist was on the team. The city confirmed they hired specialists for ecological studies (fish, waterfowl, reptiles, amphibians) but the results are not yet available at this meeting; they will be included in permit applications. Discussion Items - City staff emphasized that the core engineering for the dam (raising embankments, spillway reconstruction) is largely fixed and will not change based on public access design. The goal is to layer recreational benefits without compromising water supply protection. - The team clarified that the tidal gate location (near Braga Park) will be a passive/controlled gate, and the elevation differences between North and South Pond will be managed hydraulically. - The operations plan for the new spillway gate is not yet developed, but the intent is to improve upon current capabilities. Key Outcomes - No votes or decisions were made. The meeting was intended for information sharing and public input. - The public was invited to visit breakout stations to provide feedback on design preferences (embankment materials, pedestrian improvements). - The city will continue to refine the design and pursue permits, incorporating ecological studies and flood modeling results.

The Newport City Council held a workshop on February 18, 2026, to discuss the Sister City Commission's role, activities, and future direction. The commission presented a comprehensive vision for the program, dubbed "Sister City 2.0," emphasizing education, economic development, community partnerships, and arts and culture as four key pillars. Council members expressed strong support for the commission's work and discussed funding, delegation formation, and the status of existing sister city relationships. Presentation by Sister City Commission - Brenda, the commission chair, introduced the new commission members and thanked previous members for their contributions. She outlined the mission to promote global cultural exchange for the entire community, with tagline "Bringing the world to Newport and Newport to the world." - The commission spent two years researching best practices from other cities (e.g., Charleston, SC; Monterey, CA) and developed four pillars: - Education: Promoting cultural understanding and global awareness through student exchanges, lectures, and cross-cultural events. Brenda reported on upcoming visitors: 25 students from Shimoda, Japan, in March with two teachers, and six Italian students for the first time in April. She has met with Superintendent Germain, parents, and Rogers High School principal to develop a sustained exchange program, and is seeking external funding (e.g., legislative grants). - Economic Development: Presented by Joe, who highlighted workforce exchanges, trade, and benefits to local independent businesses from international tourism. Imperia, Italy, is noted for its regatta connection to Newport. - Community Partnerships: Presented by Michelle, focusing on messaging, inclusivity, and sharing events through free local media to engage businesses and nonprofits. - Arts and Culture: Presented by Mary, an artist who hosted a Shimoda delegation in her studio. Proposed international art exhibits, artist-in-residence programs (e.g., with Kinsale, Ireland), and school art exchanges through Sister Cities International's young artists and authors program. - Michael presented a standard operating procedure (13 articles) with Appendix B: an annual report template covering travel, incoming delegations, initiatives, cultural/educational exchanges, business collaboratives, and community outreach. - Key discussion points raised by the commission included the need for transparent delegation formation and funding processes, post-trip reports, and alignment with council vision. Council Discussion and Questions - Council member Smite praised the commission's work, noting it checks boxes for community engagement, accountability, and long-term benefits to taxpayers. He emphasized the importance of reporting and transparency. - Council member Chip (likely the mayor or another councilor) highlighted the historical importance of the program, especially the Japan (Shimoda) student exchange, which has changed lives. He suggested exploring non-taxpayer funding sources, such as revenue from the Gateway Visitor Center's aquarium lease, and noted that delegations should include sector-relevant members (e.g., sailing community for Imperia). - Council member Charlie expressed enthusiasm for the educational component, recalling transformative visits to Shimoda and Kinsale schools. He asked about rekindling ties with Skiathos (Greece), La Laguna (Portugal), and St. John's (Canada). Brenda responded: a Greek businessman is helping revive Skiathos (30th anniversary in 2026); La Laguna is complicated due to its twinning with Fall River; St. John's may not be aware of the sister city relationship, and the commission may consider ending that inactive tie to pursue a French sister city given Newport's historical Rochambeau connection. - Charlie also asked about domestic sister cities. Brenda noted the program's international focus from President Eisenhower's people-to-people diplomacy, but the commission is open to exploring connections with similar U.S. cities like Annapolis or Savannah through Sister Cities International. - Regarding student travel, Brenda confirmed they are developing a program for all sister cities, not just Japan, including Zoom pen pals and art exchanges. She noted that Japan is the most aggressive in planning but Italian students are coming for the first time. The commission is working on scholarships to send Newport students abroad. - Council member Lynn recalled past funding from Discover Newport's rent and suggested using that source again. Public Comments & Testimony - Jerry Dakota (address: Green Lane) attended the last seven commission meetings and commended the commission on its transformation from a "iffy former operation" to a fantastic, well-organized program. He noted that four council members were absent but appreciated the workshop. Key Outcomes - No formal votes or motions were made. The council expressed strong, unanimous support for the commission's vision and work. - The commission will take council feedback (e.g., delegation formation, funding, domestic city possibilities) to refine priorities and circle back. - Brenda requested help finding home stays for visiting Italian students and teachers arriving in late April. - The workshop reinforced the importance of the Sister City Commission as a valued advisory body to the city.

The Newport City Council met on February 11, 2026, to discuss and vote on several key items, including the 2027-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP), a reallocation of bond funding for a wastewater treatment project, and resolutions on snow removal, Black History Month, and support for the Newport Hospital birthing center. The meeting highlighted tensions between council members and the administration over project execution and funding priorities. Consent Calendar - The council approved the consent calendar with the exception of items B7 and D. - Approved a fireworks permit for Preston Young d/b/a Young Myack Wedding, for a five-minute display off Bel Mayer on June 5, 2026, at 9 p.m., the second of eight permitted per calendar year. Discussion Items - 2027-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Follow-up: The council discussed a memorandum from Finance Director Jim Nolan. Councilor Carlin expressed frustration that sidewalk improvements funded in the FY26 budget have not yet begun, warning he would not support the FY27 budget if construction is not underway by summer. Councilor Smythe echoed concerns about approving projects that do not come to fruition. Councilor Comravong stated he would vote against any budget without sidewalk work starting well before the next budget cycle. - Public Safety Complex Study: Councilor Pinock questioned a $7.25 million line item labeled a "feasibility study." Director Nolan clarified that the figure includes land acquisition (approximately $5.5 million), architectural work, and site work. Councilor Pinock expressed opposition to a $7.2 million study, insisting the money should be used for construction. - Impound Lot: Police Chief Duffy explained that a proposed impound lot in the CIP is for seized evidence vehicles, not storm-towed cars. The secure facility is needed to maintain chain of custody and protect operations at the police station. - Cliff Walk Repairs: Councilor Carlin asked about the timeline for Cliff Walk repairs. Director Nolan stated that permits were filed with CRMC, Army Corps, and DEM on December 23, 2025, and if approved by June/July 2026, bidding could occur, with construction possible by next year, depending on material and contractor availability. - Playground Improvements: Councilor Pinock raised accessibility concerns for children with mobility devices. Director Nolan noted that parks officials prioritize both accessibility and inclusivity (e.g., sensory elements). Councilor Pinock pointed out that 74% of school-age children live in Ward 1, suggesting Miantonomi Playground may be more equitable than the currently planned Quidnik Park. - Tree and Open Space Master Plan Update: Councilor Smith thanked the Tree and Open Space Commission for their work on the 2026 update. Commission Chair Maureen Cronin highlighted extensive community engagement, with workshops, emails, and coffee meetings. She thanked the VMBR and Charitable Foundation for funding two master plans. - Reallocation of Bond Funding for Primary Clarifier Project: The administration requested approval to reallocate $12.5 million from general obligation bond funds, originally designated for stormwater and beach erosion projects (Easton Pond, Elizabeth Brook), to advance the primary clarifier rehabilitation at the Water Pollution Control Facility. Director of Utilities Rob Schultz explained that the clarifier is at risk of imminent failure, with potential fines and emergency costs four to six times higher. Councilor Carlin and Councilor Smythe opposed reallocation, arguing it betrays voter trust, as voters approved the bond for specific projects. Councilor Carlin suggested using the $34 million fund balance instead. Director Nolan warned that using fund balance could impact bond ratings. The motion failed 6-1, with only one councilor voting in favor. - Mooring Permit Ordinance Amendment: The council approved first reading of an amendment to Section 12.28.071, removing liability insurance requirements for commercial mooring permit holders. City Solicitor Bean explained that the change allows a comprehensive review of commercial mooring ordinances, including future insurance requirements. - Speed Camera Revenue: The council voted to continue a resolution on speed camera revenue to a future meeting. - Snow Removal Resolution: Councilor Holder introduced a resolution directing the administration to revisit ordinances for snow removal, including operational priorities, sidewalk responsibilities, and parking bans. Councilors thanked city workers, noting the January 25 storm was the largest in a decade. Councilor Carlin noted that the council previously voted against hiring more personnel for enforcement. Councilor Bennett suggested less punitive consequences for elderly residents. City Manager reported over 200 fines for sidewalk violations. The resolution passed unanimously. - Black History Month Recognition: Councilor Pinock introduced a resolution formally recognizing February as Black History Month and establishing an annual flag-raising ceremony. An amendment to hold ceremonies at City Hall "and" other locations was adopted. Councilor Pinock shared personal reflections on being the third woman of color on the council. The amended resolution passed unanimously. - Birthing Center Support Resolution: Councilor Comravong introduced a resolution supporting legislation to maintain operations at the Birthing Center at Newport Hospital. Councilor Comravong stated the resolution is stronger than the first, drawing a line on essential healthcare, noting the potential impact on public safety and the local economy. Councilor Carlin emphasized his commitment to advocating for increased state funding for uncompensated hospital care. The council passed the resolution unanimously. Key Outcomes - The council declined to approve the reallocation of $12.5 million in GO bond funds for the clarifier project, with a 6-1 vote against. - The council passed resolutions on snow removal, Black History Month recognition, and support for the birthing center. - The council continued consideration of the speed camera revenue resolution. - The council received and filed the Tree and Open Space Master Plan update.

The Newport Historic District Commission (HDC) met on Tuesday, February 10, 2026, at 11:45 AM to review several applications for certificates of appropriateness, provide design recommendations, and elect officers for the 2026 calendar year. The meeting was chaired by Diana Amarillo, with a quorum present. Consent Calendar - Minutes of the January 13, 2026 meeting were approved unanimously. - Staff findings of fact were accepted for applications C3 (6 Greeno Place), C4 (97 Harrison Ave), UN PL, C5 (30 Poplar Street), and C6 (73 Catherine Street). These applications were not heard this evening. - Summary approvals (no public opposition): - 32 Clark Street (24/085): Approved for repairs/certificate of appropriateness, citing Newport Standards 17 TAC 80 060 a1,4,5,7. - 146 Brenton Road (43/064): Approved for new construction with a condition to maintain a curved garage opening as shown in a secondary plan, citing Newport Standards 17 TAC 80 060 B1,2. Discussion Items - A1: 61-63 K Street (22/003) – Extension of certificate of appropriateness for a two-story rear addition (staircase). The applicant (Russell Jackson, Miller Scott Holbrook & Jackson) explained the original approval had expired. No changes to the design. Motion to extend approved unanimously. - A2: 105 Broadway (21/196) – Architectural review and recommendation for a mixed-use building with ground-floor retail and an 11-unit vacation guest facility (20 bedrooms) in a general business zone (non-historic district). The commission provided comments on compatibility with the Broadway Historic Area. Commissioners noted the building appeared institutional, boxy, and too glassy, with no obvious entry. They recommended softening the design with architectural details (e.g., arched windows, corbels, recessed entrance, stepbacks). The preservation planner noted a prior TRC recommendation for a stepback on the fourth floor. The commission’s feedback will be forwarded to the Director of Planning for final plan approval. - C2: 11 Brenton Road (41/416) – New construction of a single-family home on the former Underwood School site (non-contributing). The applicant presented a revised Dutch Colonial design after a design review committee session. Commissioners praised the collaborative process and the design's compatibility with the neighborhood. Approved unanimously. - 27-31 Franklin Street (27/72) – Contributing structure; extensive alterations including a rear shed dormer, bulkhead replacement, chimney reconstruction, door/window changes, signage, and HVAC. The commission had concerns about the large dormer size and changes to rear fenestration. The application was split: Part 1 (bulkhead, faux chimney, HVAC with screening review) approved; Part 2 (dormer, front door, rear windows, signage, HVAC placement details) continued to March 10, 2026, pending an updated window report including the front door and transom. - 160 Webster Street (36/003) – Replacement of a 16-foot aluminum garage door with a carriage-style door. The applicant (Spencer McComb) amended the design to remove divided lights, leaving four full lights, to better match the house’s 1970s style. Approved as amended. - 16 Clark Street (24/049) – Contributing structure; replacement of deck railings, balusters, decking, and lattice with raised panels. The commission encouraged pursuing a variance for the railing height (currently 30 inches, code requires 42 inches) to preserve historic character. They recommended repairing original balusters where possible, using mahogany decking, and adding tongue-and-groove paneling with preserved brick piers. Approved with conditions. - 11 Gurney Court (12/020) – Contributing structure; comprehensive restoration replacing vinyl windows/doors with wood, new chimney, garage door changes, etc. Commissioners supported the project but requested the front door be a single half-light door with sidelights rather than double doors, and that the new chimney be differentiated from the original. Approved with these conditions. Key Outcomes - Approved applications (with conditions where noted): - 32 Clark Street, 146 Brenton Road, 61-63 K Street, 11 Brenton Road, 160 Webster Street (as amended), 16 Clark Street (conditions), 11 Gurney Court (conditions). - Continued application: Part 2 of 27-31 Franklin Street continued to March 10, 2026. - Officers elected for 2026: Diana Amarillo (Chair), James Madsen (Vice Chair), Kelly Moran (Secretary). - Brooke Richter recognized as a full-time commission member. - All certificates of appropriateness issued this evening are valid for one year from the date of approval. Recusals: Commissioner Goddard recused from 160 Webster Street and 11 Gurney Court; Commissioner Bala recused from 16 Clark Street.

The Newport City Council held a workshop on February 9, 2026, to discuss a proposed Resiliency and Sustainability Fund funded by a conveyance tax on certain property sales. The meeting was informational only, with no votes taken. The proposal, presented by Fire Chief Harp Donnelly, aims to create a dedicated revenue source for resiliency and sustainability projects without increasing property taxes on year-round residents. Public Comments & Testimony - Tyler Bernardine, President of the Newport County Board of Realtors, expressed strong opposition to the conveyance tax, arguing it would penalize property owners, discourage investment, and harm the housing market. He noted that similar taxes in Block Island and Little Compton work only because 75-90% of homes are second homes, unlike Newport. He offered to provide data and requested a collaborative role for the Board of Realtors. - Casey Tremper, a year-round renter, expressed support for the exemption for full-time residents, saying it gave her hope of eventually owning property in Newport. She emphasized the importance of resiliency. Discussion Items - Presentation of the Resiliency Trust Fund: Chief Donnelly outlined the proposal for a one-time conveyance tax on property sales, paid by the buyer, applied only to properties not qualifying for Newport's lower residential tax rate (i.e., second homes, investment properties, commercial). Exemptions apply to year-round homeowners and long-term rentals (with an affidavit to maintain that status for a set period, e.g., five years). The tax would be set annually by the council (enabling legislation allows up to 5%, but the council can choose any rate). Revenue estimate: 1% would generate approximately $5.6 million annually based on last year's sales. - Council Questions: Council members asked about enforcement, impact on first-time homebuyers, fraud prevention, and the need for additional staff. The chief answered that fraud would be tracked through property transactions and penalties, and that the tax is not applied to year-round residents or long-term rentals. Concerns were raised about the burden on those who must move unexpectedly, but the chief noted that options exist (e.g., renting out the property to meet the term). - Alternative Revenue Sources: Council members asked about other options for funding resiliency. The chief noted that the fund could also accept grants and donations, but the conveyance tax provides a predictable, dedicated source. - State Involvement: Discussion included the risk of the state taking a portion of the funds, but the chief noted that similar taxes have been in place for 40 years in other Rhode Island communities without such interference. Senator Oyer and Representative Lauren Carson have indicated willingness to sponsor legislation if the council approves. Key Outcomes - No votes or formal decisions were made. The workshop was solely for education and discussion. - The council considered but did not commit to forwarding a resolution to the General Assembly this year. A deadline of February 14 (the following Friday) was mentioned but not acted upon. - Requests were made for additional data, including the number of single-family homes, multi-family homes, and registered short-term rentals in Newport. - Council members suggested re-engaging an ad hoc tax commission to strategize implementation and work with the real estate industry. - The next steps include further deliberation, potential public hearings, and possible submission of enabling legislation at a later date.

This joint workshop of the Newport City Council and Beach Commission was held to review the status of the Easton's Beach resilience project, which began over a year ago. The project aims to address beach vulnerability following storms in December 2023 and January 2024, and to determine how to spend the $11 million general obligation bond approved in 2024. Consultants from Fuss & O'Neill, Woods Hole Group, and DBVW Architects presented three dune nourishment concepts, a building conditions assessment, and a potential funding timeline. Public Comments & Testimony - Mike Ryan (59 Hunter Avenue) expressed support for prioritizing recreation and family-oriented amenities at the beach, including a possible carousel relocation, splash pad, and snack bar. He defended the private bathhouses and argued that parking lot and road flooding are not major concerns, but protecting the drinking water supply is critical. He urged splitting the project into phases to address deteriorating facilities sooner. - Emily Conklin (7 Gwyn Court), Vice Chair of the Energy and Environment Commission and a marine biologist, expressed strong support for nature-based solutions and emphasized that a resilient beach is necessary for recreation. She agreed with Commissioner Allie Oakley that parking should not be the primary focus and that adding hard structures would be a mistake. - Lola Herrera, an oceanographer, supported the second (partial dune) and third (full dune) options, arguing that recreation must be balanced with resilience. She cautioned against wasting money on buildings that will be destroyed by future storms and recommended permeable parking solutions to reduce flooding. - Michael Wilson (5 Annadale, Newport) advocated for studying offshore wave attenuation (e.g., concrete jacks) to reduce wave energy, and for raising Memorial Boulevard with state cooperation. He argued that without addressing the root cause of erosion, sand nourishment alone will be insufficient. Presentation on Dune Nourishment Concepts - Brittany Hoffnagel (Woods Hole Group) presented the data collection and modeling approach. Field investigations in fall 2024 informed existing conditions modeling in spring 2025. Three concepts were developed: - Phased Dune Concept: 100-foot beach berm with a 40-foot dune; maintains all existing infrastructure. Estimated cost $6.3–$6.5 million; service life 2.5 years before nourishment needed. Provides protection against a 2-year storm but not against larger or sequential storms. - Partial Dune Concept: Maintains 500 parking spaces (out of 850). Wider dune on west side, narrower on east to preserve parking. Estimated cost $9–$10.2 million; service life 6 years. Protects against 2- and 10-year storms, but not larger. - Full Dune Concept: Reduces parking to 300 spaces; consistent 80-foot dune along the entire beach. Estimated cost $9.9–$11.7 million; service life 6–8 years. Protects against 2- and 10-year storms and sequential storms; still vulnerable to 20-year+ storms. - Sea level rise scenario (1.5 feet by 2060) shows that even the 2-year storm would overwhelm the phased concept; only partial and full dunes offer some protection. - Beth (Fuss & O'Neill) noted that the phased approach is risk‑based and could be wiped out by a single storm, while the partial and full dunes provide more robust, longer‑lasting resilience. The $11 million bond could serve as matching funds for a federal grant (e.g., NIFWIF). Presentation on Building Assessments and Amenity Recommendations - Martha Warenfelds (DBVW Architects) presented findings from a 200‑page conditions assessment of the bathhouses, restrooms, picnic pavilion, and rotunda. Key issues: concrete deck not properly pitched, steel connections rusted, rotunda basement floods regularly, and buildings are not resilient to storms. Survey results (229 responses) indicated that private bathhouses and private event spaces scored lowest in importance; public restrooms and lifeguard facilities were top priorities. - Recommendations: demolish existing bathhouses and concrete platform (cost $800,000), build new elevated restroom and lifeguard pavilions (cost estimate TBD), consider temporary trailers for food/retail, and either renovate the rotunda (cost $3.2 million for like‑for‑like rebuild), convert it to an open‑air folly, or remove it. The rotunda is not historically designated. Discussion on Trade-offs and Next Steps - Beach Commission members and City Council discussed the balance between parking, resilience, and recreation. Commissioner Allie Oakley noted that the parking lot does not fill every summer day and that losing some spaces is acceptable for saving the beach. Chair Mark Fitzgerald stressed the need for an economic impact study to understand the beach's value to the city; Salve Regina University has been proposed to conduct such a study. - Mayor and Councilor Gina Politano raised concerns about construction duration (estimated 1–1.5 years) and the impact on parking revenue and event parking. Commissioner Nick (last name not given) noted that the phased concept is considered ineffective and urged focusing on partial or full options. - The team clarified that no hard structures (seawalls, breakwaters) are permitted; nature‑based sand solutions are the only viable option. Parking garages were deemed too expensive and not cost‑effective. - The $11 million bond has $10 million remaining after initial expenditures for design and permitting. The NIFWIF grant requires permits and construction documents to be ready by the time funding arrives (estimated May 2027 if awarded in December 2026). A letter of interest is due by April/May 2026, with a full proposal due by July 2026. Waiting a year would delay construction further and risk bond fund expiration. Key Outcomes - No formal votes were taken; this was a workshop to inform decision‑making. - The Beach Commission indicated they will provide a formal recommendation at a future meeting, likely favoring either the partial or full dune concept, with a preference for the medium (partial) option due to its balance of parking and protection. - The City Council acknowledged the timeline pressure and the need to decide soon to meet grant deadlines. - Further steps include: - Engaging Salve Regina University for an economic impact study of the beach. - Coordinating with Rhode Island DOT on Memorial Boulevard resilience (the road is a top state priority). - Developing a maintenance and nourishment funding plan, as done in neighboring Narragansett. - Continuing to explore sediment sources and permitting with the Army Corps and CRMC.

The Newport Planning Board met at 6:30 PM on February 2, 2026, with a quorum of eight members present (Marvin Polski, Richard Connelly, Teresa Stows, Paul Green, Patricia Antonelli, Frederick Huntsbury, Kevin Mechan; John Christian absent). The meeting covered approval of prior minutes, a staff refresher on training requirements, proposed zoning amendments for guest houses (short‑term rentals), the first annual Green and Complete Streets report, administrative actions, and liaison updates. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes (December 1, 2025): Unanimously approved after an amendment was added to list Paul Green as an attendee. Discussion Items - Planning Board Training Requirements: Staff presented a brief refresher on board composition (nine full members, quorum of five), 75% annual attendance requirement, liaison roles, and continuing education obligations. The two required one‑hour workshops for February were noted; dates for the three‑hour introductory course are pending from the state. Staff offered to forward completed training certificates to the city clerk. No vote taken. - Guest House Zoning Amendments (Resolution 2025‑88): Staff walked the board through proposed changes to multiple zoning chapters (definitions, parking, permitted uses in general business and waterfront business districts). Key amendments include: requiring an on‑site manager who resides in a long‑term dwelling unit (with the board later recommending a 12‑month lease), eliminating the parking credit for guest house conversions, and requiring a special use permit for new guest houses and vacation guest facilities (previously allowed by right). A board member (Trish) clarified that “guest house” is synonymous with short‑term rentals like Airbnb, and “transient guest facilities” refers to hotels with kitchens. Board members discussed whether houseboats used as guest facilities should be addressed; staff noted the city lacks zoning jurisdiction on the water. The board decided to refer the houseboat question to the Waterfront Commission and the Comprehensive Plan update rather than delay the current amendments. The board unanimously voted to find the proposed amendments consistent with the purposes of zoning and the Comprehensive Plan, and to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council, amended to require a 12‑month lease for the manager’s unit (changed from “long‑term rental”). Both motions passed without dissent. - Green and Complete Streets Annual Report: Staff presented the first annual report since the policy’s adoption in 2022. The report described a newly developed public input process and an exception process for roadway design standards. Using a scoring rubric (max 35 points, with higher scores indicating greater need), staff evaluated 70 streets candidates for the 2026 roadway improvement program. The Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) reviewed the evaluations and voted to recommend: advanced redesign for nine streets (e.g., Narragansett, Oak Point, Hillside, Washington), simple improvements for 28 streets, and exceptions (no design improvements) for 33 streets. Staff noted a $4 million “Safe Streets for All” grant for Newport and the city’s renewal as a Bronze Bicycle Friendly Community. Board members asked about state‑controlled roads like America’s Cup Avenue; staff explained coordination through the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). - Administrative Actions: Five items were presented for information only. One project (1731–75 Cog Shell) – a previously approved subdivision – had received demolition approval for a carriage house from the Technical Review Committee (TRC). A board member expressed strong concern that the city lacks demolition policies for historic buildings outside the historic district, stating “we strongly need demolition policies … photographing it isn’t enough.” Staff agreed and noted they are exploring mechanisms such as historic overlay zoning. Key Outcomes - Minutes of December 1, 2025: Approved unanimously. - Guest House Zoning Amendments: Unanimous votes to (1) find the amendments consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and zoning purposes, and (2) forward a positive recommendation to the City Council with the 12‑month lease requirement included. Houseboat regulation was referred to the Waterfront Commission and the Comp Plan update. - Green and Complete Streets: The board accepted the annual report as presented; staff will continue funding applications and coordination with utilities. No formal vote taken. - Demolition Policy: Staff to continue developing tools to protect historic and vernacular buildings outside the historic district. - Liaison Reports: Tree and Open Space Commission met later that evening; Waterfront Commission is developing a harbor management improvement program to present to the City Council in March; Energy and Environment Commission held leadership elections; Comprehensive Plan update remains on schedule with a focus group “marathon” planned for mid‑March. Meeting adjourned at 7:42 PM.