Public Meetings - San Antonio, Texas

The San Antonio City Council convened at 9:15 AM on September 17, 2026, to adopt the Fiscal Year 2027 budget, culminating months of deliberations. The meeting included a celebration of the U.S. Air Force's 79th birthday, recognition of POW/MIA Day, and extensive public testimony and council debate over a proposed property tax increase—the first in 33 years—and various fee adjustments. The final budget, totaling $4.4 billion, was approved by a 7-4 vote, along with a property tax rate increase and fee ordinances. Consent Calendar - Items 11 through 24 on the consent agenda were approved unanimously without individual discussion. One public speaker, Teresa Gutierrez, addressed item 11. Public Comments & Testimony - Zachary Carrasco (Taft High School student, Mayor's Fitness Council) urged the council to restore funding for the Mayor's Fitness Council, citing its impact on youth leadership and community. - Ed Bannis (District 4 resident, former Coast Guard) urged support for all increases, arguing the city is not broke but has a distribution problem. - Ana Acevedo and Dr. Rocha Garcia (San Antonio Education Partnership) requested full restoration of $2.2 million in scholarship funding for 2,900 students, emphasizing the return on investment. - Paul Rodriguez (UP Partnership) asked for continued investment in youth programs and a transparent framework for future cuts. - Father Dennis Schaefer (COPS/Metro Alliance) supported a modest tax increase, arguing it would not harm the most vulnerable (47% of taxpayers unaffected) and that investment in people is key to future prosperity. - Jeanette McCart (Brown Station West community president) opposed the tax increase, citing fixed-income retirees and rising costs, urging the council to cut spending instead. - Judith Gerwitz (District 8 resident) opposed raising taxes when basic services like police staffing are lacking, arguing tax increases hurt renters and the poor. - Christopher Longoria (Americans for Prosperity) urged the council to find a different path, proposing cuts to the Ready to Work program and across-the-board departmental reductions. - Jack M. Finger (Americans for Prosperity) denounced the tax increase and fee hikes (garage sale permits, parking, garbage) as kicking taxpayers when down, questioning the reproductive justice fund. - Hope Garza (Americans for Prosperity) appealed to the council's conscience, emphasizing the burden on seniors, veterans, and families, and asked for no new revenue. - Mae Ellsbury (Americans for Prosperity) requested rejection of the property tax increase, arguing the city's spending growth (4.1%) outpaces the tax base. - Manny Garcia urged voting against the tax increase to keep San Antonio affordable for young families and retirees. - John Melendez (Americans for Prosperity) opposed the tax increase, noting it affects homeowners, renters, and businesses, and called for a no-new-revenue rate. - Rodney Kidd urged protecting arts and culture as economic infrastructure, improving traffic safety, and expanding business incubators. - Kathleen Vail (District 1 homeowner) argued for equity in cuts, warning against cutting services while funding a downtown sports stadium. - Debbie Benke (automotive recycling industry) opposed a 400% increase in license fees for auto recyclers, stating it would hurt businesses and lead to more abandoned vehicles. - Dan Snyder (auto recycler) requested a balanced approach to fee increases and promised to submit additional comments. - Clemente Sanchez (San Antonio Apartment Association) criticized the lack of transparency in the proposed increase in apartment inspection fees from $100 to $200 per unit, requesting the same engagement given to other industries. Discussion Items - City Manager's Budget Presentation: Deputy Manager Justina Tate presented final amendments, including $4.5 million in additional revenue over two years from increased fees (booting, parking fines, river barge tickets, hazmat, library cards) and restoration of programs such as part-time nutrition sites, tuition reimbursement, San Antonio Education Partnership scholarships (restored $1.5 million of $2.1 million), a cultural initiatives position, the gastronomy program (absorbed by Visit San Antonio in FY28), DSE SAS ($40,000 from council carryforwards), a climate adaptation manager, five health department positions, and after-school challenge funding for Southwest ISD. Also included: $1 million for women's health programs (reproductive justice) from Medicaid waiver reserves, and an increase in capital improvement projects per council district from $200,000 to $1 million (total $8 million) funded through debt capacity. - Council Debate on the Budget and Amendments: - Councilmember McKee Rodriguez (District 2) urged supporting the budget as presented, stressing that cuts would disproportionately harm districts 1-5, and called for continued conversation on long-term revenue. - Councilmember Via Gran (District 4) noted the 3.5% cap on property tax increases and stated the budget protects core services. He opposed amendments. - Councilmember Alderete Gavito (District 7) stated she would vote no on the tax increase, preferring a 1.6% across-the-board cut, but respected colleagues' intentions. - Councilmember Galvan (District 6) supported the budget, arguing that cuts beyond what staff proposed would directly harm services like libraries, parks, and public safety. He noted the state's $27 billion rainy day fund. - Councilmember Mesa Gonzalez (District 8) supported the budget, stressing that rejecting the tax increase would abdicate council responsibility to the city manager. She called for more transparent budget formats. - Councilmember Mungia (District 4) supported the budget, noting that the most humble residents were willing to pay more to maintain services, and criticized the state for sitting on surplus funds. - Councilmember White (District 10) opposed the tax increase, arguing the city's spending is out of control (general fund grew $600 million in 10 years, non-public safety personnel spending grew 18.5% vs. 5.5% population growth). He proposed an amendment to fund 10 safe officers ($1.6 million) via cuts to the Northeast Corridor Revitalization program and SA Tomorrow planning, but the amendment failed (7-4? not specified, but motion failed). He later moved to delay the vote for a week to study across-the-board cuts, but that motion also failed. - Councilmember Spears (District 9) opposed the tax increase, arguing for cuts to core services first. She proposed an amendment for 10 additional patrol officers funded by cuts to adult programming ($750,000) and the SAWS Plumbers to People program ($407,618), but it failed. She then attempted an amendment to fund two safe officers from her and Councilmember White's district budgets, but withdrew it after the police chief could not guarantee they would stay in the north substation. - Councilmember Corr (District 1) supported the budget, highlighting that homestead exemptions have reduced taxes for many, and the increase for a median home ($235,000) would be $36/year. - Councilmember Castillo (District 5) supported the budget, praising the $6 million increase in affordable housing, restoration of CIP, reproductive justice fund, and fee increases for auto recyclers to address environmental concerns. - Mayor Jones (who cast a 'No' vote) opposed the budget, arguing that the council did not exhaust all options (e.g., transferring eligible expenses to Ready to Work) and that a 1.6% cut could have avoided the tax increase. She noted the budget still funds Fiesta, UT public health, botanical gardens, and the World Heritage Office. Key Outcomes - Item 5 (FY 2027 Budget Adoption): Approved by voice vote (7-4; Councilmembers Alderete Gavito, Spears, White, and Mayor Jones voted 'Nay'). The motion included approval of the budget as presented except for funding for Guardian House, which was then separately approved. - Item 6 (Tax Revenue Ratification): Approved (same vote). - Item 7 (Property Tax Rate - M&O): Approved 7-4. The rate is set at 35.138 cents per $100 valuation, a 2.20% increase over the previous rate. - Item 8 (Debt Service Tax Rate): Approved by voice vote (21.150 cents per $100, an increase). - Item 9 (Fee Ordinance): Approved by voice vote. - Item 10 (Closing Ordinance): Approved by voice vote. - All amendments (White's safe officers, Spears' patrol officers, and the delay motion) failed.

The San Antonio City Council met on September 17, 2026, to adopt the Fiscal Year 2027 budget, which included the first property tax rate increase in 33 years. The meeting began with an invocation, the Pledge of Allegiance, and a celebration of the U.S. Air Force's 79th anniversary. The council considered multiple budget-related ordinances (Items 5-10) after receiving public testimony. After extensive debate and two failed amendments, the council approved the budget package and the tax rate increase by a 7-4 vote. Consent Calendar - Items 11 through 24 were approved as a consent agenda without objection. A member of the public (Teresa Gutiérrez) was registered to speak on Item 11 but no individual removal occurred; the full consent calendar passed unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Support for budget and tax increase: - Zachary Carrasco (student, Taft High School) urged support for the wellness council cycling program, stating it provided opportunities for youth. - Ed Vanestro (District 4 resident) thanked the council and urged approval of all increases, arguing for better distribution of wealth. - Ana Acevedo (on behalf of scholarship recipients) requested full restoration of scholarship funds to $2.2 million and supported the tax increase to maintain services. - Paul Rodriguez (Bexar County partnership) emphasized that budget cuts hurt families and students depending on scholarships and nonprofit programs. - Father Shane Drennan (COPS/Metro Alliance) argued that the tax increase is modest and necessary to avoid cutting services for the most vulnerable, noting 47% of property owners would see no increase. - Rodney Kidd urged protecting arts, culture, and tourism as economic infrastructure. - Linda Thomas called for equity and opposed cuts that would disproportionately harm low-income residents. - Opposition to budget and tax increase: - Jonathan McCart (West Community president, representing 4,000 residents) opposed the tax increase, arguing residents on fixed incomes cannot afford higher costs. - Judith Growitz (District 8 resident) pleaded against the tax increase, saying it hurts homeowners and renters alike. - Christopher Longoria (Americans for Prosperity, District 10) requested a different path: reject the tax increase, cut 1.6% from each department in FY2028, and reduce council consulting and travel. - Jack Finger (Americans for Prosperity) condemned the tax increase as kicking taxpayers while they are down, also opposing fee increases for garage sales, parking, and fireworks. - Hope Garza (Americans for Prosperity) argued the tax increase would devastate family budgets and future generations. - Maya Alsbury (Americans for Prosperity) requested rejection of the property tax increase, calling it a result of poor fiscal management. - Manny García (lifelong resident) asked for a vote against the tax increase to keep San Antonio affordable. - John Melendez (Americans for Prosperity director) urged not raising the tax rate and instead cutting wasteful spending. - Debbie Banke (recycling industry) opposed a 400% fee increase for recycler licenses, warning it would lead to more abandoned vehicles and hurt families. - Carl Schneider (recycling facility owner) opposed the 400% increase, asking for proportional fee increases over time. - Clemente Sánchez (apartment association) requested transparency and a fair process for proposed fee increases affecting housing providers. Discussion Items - Budget presentation and amendments: The city manager presented last-minute amendments to the FY2027 budget, increasing revenue by $4.6 million over two years through fee adjustments (e.g., vehicle fees, river boat tickets from $15 to $20, library card fees from $20 to $30, etc.). These revenues restored several proposed cuts: nutrition centers, tuition reimbursement, Tamara scholarship funding, historical preservation positions, a culinary program, climate adaptation manager, and five health department positions. Capital improvement projects per district were also increased by $200,000 to $1 million total. - Councilmember positions: - Councilmember Maki Rodríguez (District 2) supported the budget and tax increase, arguing it is necessary and that the city must lead. - Councilmember Alderete Gavito (District 3) opposed the tax increase, stating she would vote no but respected the process. - Councilmember Galván (District 6) supported the budget, citing the need to maintain services. - Councilmember Mesa González (District 8) supported the budget, emphasizing the importance of public safety and infrastructure. - Councilmember Corr (District 1) supported the tax increase, arguing that the wealthiest homeowners can afford the modest increase to protect critical programs. - Councilmember Castillo (District 5) supported the budget, thanking staff and noting the need for code enforcement and recycling regulations. - Councilmember Spears (District 9) opposed, arguing for 1.6% across-the-board cuts instead of a tax increase. - Councilmember White (District 10) opposed, proposing a delay to examine across-the-board cuts. - Amendments considered: - Amendment by Councilmembers White and Spears: Add 10 patrol officers ($1.6 million) by cutting $750,000 from senior programs and $470,000 from planning (Tomorrow 2/21 code). After discussion, the amendment failed on vote. - Amendment by Councilmember Spears: Add 2 patrol officers paid from District 9 and 10 office budgets ($320,000/year). This was withdrawn after the police chief noted deployment decisions are his responsibility and that officers could not be guaranteed to remain in the northern substation. - Motion to postpone the vote on Items 5-10 until the following Friday after a B-session to study 1.6% cuts failed. Key Outcomes - Item 5 (Budget adoption): The council approved the FY2027 consolidated operating and capital budget ($4.4 billion) with a motion that excluded funding for Casa Guardian. A separate motion to fund Casa Guardian then passed. The budget includes the tax rate increase and fee adjustments as proposed. - Item 6 (Ratification of higher property tax revenue): Passed. - Item 7 (Property tax rate – maintenance and operations): Set at 35.138 cents per $100 valuation, a 2.20% increase from the previous year. Vote: 7-4 (Yes: Corps, Maki Rodríguez, Villagrán, Munguía, Castillo, Galván, Mesa González; No: Alderete Gavito, Spears, White, Mayor Jones). - Item 8 (Debt service tax rate): Set at 21.150 cents per $100 valuation. Passed. - Item 9 (Fee schedule amendments): Approved, increasing various fees including recycler licenses, library cards, river boat tickets, and garage sale permits. - Item 10 (Fund transfers): Approved, allowing reallocation of funds for city needs, projects, and initiatives. - All other items on the consent calendar were approved.

The Historic and Design Review Commission (HDRC) of San Antonio met on Wednesday, September 16, 2026, at 3:00 PM. The meeting was chaired by Jay Maurice Gibbs, with Vice-Chair Jeffrey Fetzer. The commission considered a consent agenda and several individual items involving certificates of appropriateness for properties in historic districts. Consent Calendar - Items 1 through 10 and 13 were approved as part of the consent agenda, including addresses: 808 North Pine, 875 Ashby Place, 1115 Broadway, 1114 Allen, 509 Olive, 105 South St. Mary's, 1505 Houston, 119 Craig Place, and 10750 [full address not specified]. Public Comments & Testimony - Project 14 (523 Adam Street): Cristina Chapa spoke in opposition, raising concerns about the scale (70% increase of existing house size), impact on historic character, visibility from the street, and drainage issues. - Project 15 (509 King William): Eight letters of support were submitted. The applicant, Daniel Cruz, presented the proposal and argued for modifications to the east façade of the conservatory (natatorio) to open it with large glass doors, citing historic precedent and desire for usability. Discussion Items - Project 11 (808 North Pine): The applicant requested a 16-foot-wide garage door for two parking spaces. Commissioner Sabino expressed concern about proportion and suggested two 8-foot doors. After discussion, a motion was made to approve with stipulations including two separate doors and a site plan showing driveway approaches. The motion passed unanimously. - Project 12 (125 West Ashby Place): The item was pulled due to a discrepancy in the agenda listing (address confusion). The applicant was not present. A motion to continue to October 1, 2026, was approved unanimously. - Project 14 (523 Adam Street): The applicant requested approval for a rear addition (825 sq ft) and roof replacement. The public raised concerns about scale and drainage. Commissioners questioned the number of windows in the closet and terrace permeability. The project was approved with staff recommendations and stipulations, including working with staff on window sizes and standards. - Project 15 (509 King William): The proposal included a 400 sq ft addition to a historic cottage and modifications to the east façade of an existing indoor swimming pool building (natatorio). Commissioner Mazuka praised the interior restoration but expressed concern about altering the historic façade. Commissioner Group proposed an alternate motion to approve the cottage addition and refer the façade modifications to the Design Review Committee (DRC) for further study. The motion passed unanimously. Key Outcomes - Consent Calendar: Approved unanimously. - Project 11 (808 North Pine): Approved with stipulations by unanimous vote. - Project 12 (125 West Ashby Place): Continued to October 1, 2026, by unanimous vote. - Project 14 (523 Adam Street): Approved with staff recommendations by unanimous vote. - Project 15 (509 King William): Part 1 (cottage addition) approved; Part 2 (façade modifications) referred to DRC for October 7, 2026. The alternate motion passed unanimously.

The Historic and Design Review Commission met on Wednesday, September 16, 2026, at an unspecified time, with Chair Jay Maurice Gibbs presiding. The commission reviewed several applications for certificates of appropriateness in historic districts, addressing routine approvals, public testimony, and detailed discussion on four contested items. Consent Calendar - The commission approved 11 of 13 consent agenda items (items 1 through 10 and item 13) with staff stipulations via a unanimous roll-call vote. Items 11 and 12 were pulled by Commissioner Savino for discussion. Approved addresses included 808 North Pine, 125 West Ashby, 1115 Broadway, 1411 Auling, 509 North Olive, 105 South St. Mary’s (signage request), 607 East Nueva, 1505 East Houston, 105 South St. Mary’s (lighting request), 119 East Craig, and 1075 Pleasanton. Public Comments & Testimony - Christine Choppa, a neighbor on Adams Street, spoke in opposition to the proposed addition at 523 Adams Street (Item 14). She expressed concerns that the 912‑square-foot addition would be 70% of the existing house size, alter the historic character and visibility from the street, and exacerbate drainage issues given the already high impervious coverage on the property. Discussion Items - Item 11 – Garage Door at an Unspecified Address (Applicant: Jerry Wolf): The applicant requested approval for a 16-foot-wide garage door. Commissioner Savino expressed concern that a single wide door was inconsistent with historic proportions and suggested two single-bay doors. After discussion, the commission approved the project with an added stipulation requiring two single-bay garage doors and a detailed site plan showing the driveway approach. - Item 12 – Address Mix‑Up (125 West Ashby Place): The screen displayed item numbers that were flipped (item 2 vs. item 12). The commission clarified that item 2 (875 East Ashby) had already been approved through consent and formally recorded its approval. For item 12 (125 West Ashby), the applicant was not present due to the confusion; the commission continued the case to the next hearing to allow the applicant to address window-related concerns. - Item 14 – 523 Adams Street (Applicant: Nate Manfred): The applicant sought approval for a single-story addition and a standing seam metal roof. Following public testimony and commissioner questions about lot coverage (40% total), drainage, and window proportions, the commission approved the project with staff stipulations, including a directive to work with staff on window configurations. - Item 15 – King William Property (Cottage Addition and Natatorium Modification): The applicant proposed a 400‑square-foot addition to an existing cottage and heavy modification of the east facade of a historic natatorium (installing operable steel doors and removing brick walls). Staff recommended approval for the cottage but not the natatorium changes. Commissioners debated preserving the unique historic structure while allowing modern use. A substitute motion passed: approval of the cottage addition with staff stipulations, and referral of the natatorium facade modification to a Design Review Committee (DRC) for further study and potential compromise. Key Outcomes - Consent Agenda (Items 1–10, 13): Approved unanimously. - Item 11: Approved unanimously with added stipulations for two single-bay doors and a detailed site plan. - Item 12 (125 West Ashby): Continued to the next hearing via unanimous vote. - Item 14 (523 Adams Street): Approved unanimously with staff stipulations and additional window-related stipulation. - Item 15 (King William): The substitute motion (approve cottage addition with staff stipulations; refer natatorium to DRC) passed unanimously. - All votes were conducted by roll call and recorded as unanimous. No dissents or abstentions were noted.

The San Antonio City Council held a budget work session on Wednesday, September 16, 2026, beginning at 1:39 PM, to finalize amendments to the proposed FY2027-2028 budget. The session centered on whether to adopt a property tax rate increase, implement across-the-board spending cuts, or a combination of fee increases and targeted reductions. The city manager presented a list of potential amendments totaling $6.1 million over two years, along with revenue adjustments and expense reductions to maintain a balanced budget. No final vote was taken; the city manager committed to preparing a memo reflecting the council's guidance for the following day's budget vote. Discussion Items - Proposed Budget Amendments (Justina Tate, Assistant City Manager): Eight amendments were presented, including restoring funding for a part-time nutrition site, after-school programs, tuition reimbursement, 10 SAFE police officers (one per district), San Antonio Education Partnership scholarships, a cultural initiatives position, the gastronomy program, and DSE SACE through council carry-forwards. Total cost: $6.1 million over two years. - Revenue Increases: To offset amendments, proposed fee increases included booting fees ($60 to $120), vacant lot abatement fees ($250 to $400), parking fines, river barge tickets for non-residents ($15 to $20), hazmat fees for gas stations, and library card fees for non-residents ($20 to $30). Estimated additional revenue: approximately $4.5 million over two years. - Expense Reductions: To balance the budget, $1.6 million in reductions were proposed, including eliminating funding for the Local Initiative Support Corporation, childcare for board members, customer analytics software at the library, BioMed SA, and reducing the Ambassador Program and Dream Week. - Restricted Funds and Capital Budget: Proposed amendments included $500,000 per year for women's health programs (funded via Medicaid waiver reserves) and $8 million to increase capital improvement projects per council district from $200,000 to $1 million (funded via debt capacity). - Mayor's Proposal to Avoid Tax Increase: Mayor Jones proposed reducing expenses across the board by 1.6% in FY2027 and 2% in FY2028, combined with adjustments to reserves, to avoid a property tax increase in both years. This would achieve $75 million in savings over two years. - Councilmember Positions on Tax Increase: - Councilmember McKee Rodriguez supported a tax rate increase, arguing across-the-board cuts would harm vulnerable communities, and proposed emergency funding for the Boys & Girls Club. - Councilmember Viagran supported a tax increase, calling it an investment, and opposed adding SAFE officers, instead advocating for filling civilian positions and conducting an overtime audit before adding police personnel. - Councilmember Aldarete Gavito opposed a tax increase and supported across-the-board cuts, noting she had previously advocated for 2% reductions. - Councilmember Corr expressed caution about across-the-board cuts without knowing specific impacts, and proposed reducing SAFE officers to 2-3 for districts needing additional patrol. - Councilmember Castillo opposed adding SAFE officers, preferring to redirect those funds to restore the climate adaptation position in the Office of Sustainability and fully fund the Ambassador Program. - Councilmember Galvan supported a tax increase, warning that continued cuts would degrade services, and opposed the across-the-board reduction without details. - Councilmember Mesa Gonzalez noted that many homesteads in her district are frozen and would not be affected by a rate increase; she was open to a tax increase but wanted to see the impact of a 1% across-the-board cut. - Councilmember Spears supported the mayor's proposal for across-the-board cuts and emphasized the need for patrol officers rather than SAFE officers. - Councilmember White strongly opposed a tax increase, advocated for across-the-board spending cuts, and argued that cutting spending is the responsible path to avoid burdening residents. - Councilmember Munguia opposed across-the-board cuts without knowing specific program impacts, stating it would cede authority to staff and lack transparency for residents. - City Manager's Context: Eric (City Manager) noted that the general fund budget is increasing by $69 million net, with $65 million of that for public safety. He explained that the proposed budget uses a balanced approach: a small tax rate adjustment ($28 million), fee increases, and over $90 million in spending reductions over two years. - Councilmember McKee Rodriguez's Fiscal Illustration: He presented a hand-drawn forecast showing that without revenue increases and with continued spending on police and fire, the city would face increasingly severe cuts, eventually eliminating all non-core departments by 2041 and threatening police and fire funding by 2049. Key Outcomes - No final decisions were made; the city manager will prepare a memo for the September 17 budget vote reflecting the afternoon's discussion. - The memo will include adjustments to the amendment list: removal of the gastronomy program (absorbed by Visit SA), restoration of funding for BioMed SA and other agencies, and prioritization of restoring filled positions in sustainability, library, and Metro Health over SAFE officers. - The city manager also agreed to draft a version of the budget incorporating the mayor's proposed 1.6%/2% across-the-board cuts for council consideration the next day. - Councilmember Aldarete Gavito requested exploring council carry-forwards to fund the full $2 million for San Antonio Education Partnership scholarships; staff will include that option in the memo. - The meeting adjourned at 3:54 PM, with public comment scheduled to follow.

The San Antonio City Council held a budget session on Wednesday, September 16, 2026 (noted in the transcript as September 17 but corrected per provided date) to discuss proposed amendments to the fiscal year 2027-2028 budget and consider a potential property tax increase. The meeting focused on balancing the budget through a mix of fee increases, spending cuts, and a debated property tax rate adjustment. City Manager Assistant Justina Tay presented a package of amendments including revenue generators (fee hikes) and expenditure reductions. Mayor Jones proposed an alternative plan of 1.6% across-the-board cuts in FY2027 and 2% in FY2028 to avoid a property tax increase, sparking extensive debate among council members about priorities, transparency, and long-term fiscal sustainability. Consent Calendar - No consent calendar was presented or discussed in the meeting. Public Comments & Testimony - The transcript notes that three to four members of the public were waiting to speak at the close of the meeting, but their comments were not recorded in the provided material. Discussion Items - Proposed Budget Amendments (Justina Tay): Presented eight items in Proposal A, totaling $3.6 million over three years, including funding for a part-time nutrition program in Darner, after-school programs for the Southeast Independent School District, employee tuition, 10 additional SAFE police officers, restoration of scholarships for San Antonio Education Partnership, restoration of a cultural initiatives position in the Historic Preservation Office, restoration of a gastronomy program for world heritage, and other additions. Revenue increases were proposed via: increasing permit fees, increasing fines for vacant lots and dangerous premises from $250 to $400, increasing parking fines (generating $500,000 over two years), increasing River Barge non-resident ticket fees from $15 to $20, increasing HAZMAT gas station fees (generating $60 million over two years), and increasing lost library card fees from $20 to $30 (generating $1 million over two years). Expenditure reductions included eliminating local support programs, board member childcare, library funding, and funds for Dream Week San Antonio and San Antonio Green. Additional amendments included $1 million for women's health/reproductive justice programs funded via Medicaid reserve and capital fund, and $8 million for capital improvement projects for council districts. - Mayor's Alternative Proposal: Mayor Jones proposed to avoid property tax increases in FY2022 and 2028 (note: referencing 2026 and 2028 per context) by reducing costs 1.6% in FY2027 and 2% in FY2028 across all departments, generating approximately $28 million and $35.3 million in savings respectively. She emphasized this would allow the city to cover the budget gap without raising taxes and provide residents relief. - Council Member Maki Rodríguez: Supported the Boys and Girls Club, requesting emergency funds for a transition plan, and expressed concerns about adding 10 SAFE officers, suggesting priority should be given to filling vacancies in libraries and Metro Health. She opposed the mayor's across-the-board cuts without knowing the specific impact on vulnerable districts. - Council Member Villagran: Supported a property tax increase as an investment in the city, citing growth from Toyota and other developments, and argued the city cannot cut its way out of the deficit. - Council Member White: Advocated for the 2% across-the-board cuts (proposed by him the previous day) and argued the city must control spending rather than raise taxes. He stated families prioritize essentials and the city should do the same, with public safety as the top priority. - Council Member Curl: Noted the difficulty of last-minute proposals and requested time to review impacts. She expressed concern about eliminating 10 SAFE officers and suggested redirecting those funds to libraries and Metro Health positions. - Council Member Castillo: Supported restoring positions for Metro Health, libraries, and the sustainability department. She opposed creating new police positions when the city faces a structural deficit and lacks a comprehensive audit. - Council Member Galván: Voiced anxiety about the 1.6% cuts, noting the lack of detail on specific service reductions (e.g., sidewalks, parks, libraries). He asked for clarity on how cuts would affect public works and small departments. - Council Member Mesa González: Stated she was ready to make a difficult vote on a tax increase but needed more information on the 1.6% scenario. She asked for a calculation of a 1% cut across departments, which would generate $17.8 million and reduce the property tax impact by about $0.02 per $100 valuation (monthly savings of roughly $2.31 from $2.90 to $1.50 for an average home). - Council Member Munguía: Raised concerns about the across-the-board cuts being inequitable, as 60% of prior cuts fell on districts 1-5. He worried about giving the city manager authority to decide cuts without council input and highlighted the discomfort of employees listening without job security. - Council Member Spears: Supported the mayor's 1.6% and 2% cuts, backed the Boys and Girls Club funding, and wanted to restore Biomed and Great Hearts. She argued the city needs more patrol officers for her district. - Council Member Gavito: Opposed both the 1.6% and 2% cuts and also opposed a tax increase. She specifically questioned removing scholarship funds already committed to students and asked for a memorandum to consider alternative funding. - Council Member González: Emphasized the need for transparency with residents and noted that the city must grow its revenue base, not just cut. He presented a projection showing that if the city continues flat cuts without revenue growth, by 2041 only police and public works would be left, and by 2049 not even those. - Council Member Core: Supported restoring the gastronomy program and suggested reducing the World Heritage Office allocation by $3 million (12%) to free up funds, but was cautioned by staff that this could cost $11.2 million in lost economic impact. - City Manager Eric: Clarified the practical implications of the mayor's proposal: if adopted, the city would have to manage the 1.6% cut within each department, potentially through vacancy management and not filling positions. He noted the 1.6% ($28 million) and 2% ($35.3 million) would require adjusting the property tax rate downward. He also explained that the long-term forecast shows structural deficits and that a small tax increase combined with cuts is a balanced approach. Key Outcomes - No final vote was taken at this session. The mayor committed to providing a memorandum by the evening summarizing conclusions and potential revised amendments for the council to consider at the next meeting (scheduled for the following day, September 17, 2026, per the agenda). - Council members expressed a range of positions: some supported the mayor's across-the-board cuts to avoid a tax increase, others advocated for a modest property tax increase to preserve services, and a few proposed specific reallocations (e.g., redirecting funds from SAFE officers to libraries, restoring Biomed, funding the Boys and Girls Club). - The city manager noted that a 1% general fund reduction would generate $17.8 million and lower the tax rate impact by about 2 cents per $100 valuation (monthly savings of approximately $2.31 for the average homeowner). t- Several council members requested that items from the amendment list (e.g., SAFE officers) be reprioritized to restore funding for libraries, Metro Health, and the Boys and Girls Club. - The meeting adjourned at 3:54 PM, with three to four public speakers still waiting to be heard.

The San Antonio Zoning Commission met on September 15, 2026, at 1:00 PM, chaired by Commissioner John Bustamante. The meeting included a consent agenda of ten zoning items, two continuance hearings, public testimony on a contested rezoning, and approval of prior meeting minutes. The meeting adjourned at 1:22 PM. Consent Calendar - Items 5–14 were approved unanimously by roll call vote (11–0). These included: - Item 5: Rezone 2903 Commercial Ave from C3NA to C2. - Item 6: Rezone 311 Castillo Ave from R4CD to RM5. - Item 7: Rezone 11 Ogden St from O2 to TODMX6. - Item 8: Rezone 14989 Judson Rd from C3/C3NA to C2NACD with conditional use for parking/storage. - Item 9: Rezone 8677 IH 10 East from C3R/I1 to C3CD with conditional use for metal fabrication. - Item 10: Rezone 406 Blue Bonnet St from R3 to R3CD with conditional use for two dwelling units. - Item 11: Rezone 4022 Blanco Rd from C2 to C2CD with conditional use for motor vehicle sales. - Item 12: Amendment to MXD zoning at an unspecified location (density of 50 du/ac) and major site plan amendment. - Item 13: Rezone 800 S Alamo St from C3 to TOD MX6. - Item 14: Rezone 11902 Warfield St from I1 to L. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 2 (4400 block of Nieto Drive – proposed C2 zoning): - Joe Most (10762 Giaconi Dr) spoke in opposition, citing safety concerns for nearby homes and a future charter school. He argued that C2 uses (e.g., oil change stations) would endanger children walking to school and that commercial uses adjacent to residential create conflicts. - Amelia Peacock (2807 Millican Dr, president of Paloma community) opposed the request, emphasizing the cumulative impact of incremental commercial development near established homes and a future school. She questioned why unrestricted C2 zoning was requested instead of a more tailored, buffered approach, and noted infrastructure strains (narrow roads, drainage, traffic). She respectfully asked for denial or a more limited zoning. Discussion Items - Continuance to October 6, 2026 – Item 4 (5612 Monterey St): The commission voted unanimously (11–0) to grant a three‑week continuance as requested by the applicant. No public comment. - Continuance to October 20, 2026 – Items 2 and 3: Commissioner Pana moved, seconded by Commissioner Huey, to continue both items. Public testimony was heard (see above). Commissioner Sipes encouraged residents to contact staff and the applicant to work toward a resolution before the new date. The motion passed unanimously (11–0). Key Outcomes - The consent agenda (Items 5–14) was approved by a vote of 11–0, sending those cases to City Council with a recommendation of approval. - Item 4 was continued to October 6, 2026, by a vote of 11–0. - Items 2 and 3 were continued to October 20, 2026, by a vote of 11–0. - The minutes of the September 1, 2026, Zoning Commission meeting were approved by acclamation. No director’s report was given. The meeting adjourned at 1:22 PM.

The San Antonio City Budget Board convened on Tuesday, September 15, 2026, at 1:03 PM to review the proposed fiscal year 2027 budget, focusing on employee compensation, benefits, departmental budgets, and proposed amendments. The meeting addressed a projected structural deficit of $158 million for FY 2028 and explored strategies including property tax rate increases, fee adjustments, and spending reductions. Councilmembers debated the merits of a 2% property tax increase, with some advocating for a smaller 1% increase or no increase at all, while emphasizing the need to protect essential services and vulnerable residents. Discussion Items - Employee Compensation & Benefits: René Frieda, HR Director, presented a proposal for FY 2027 including a 3% cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) for civilian employees, 5% for police and firefighters, and 4% for police (revised). The budget includes $45 million in additional compensation. Health insurance premiums are projected to rise due to increased medical claims (from $180M in FY25 to $190M in FY27) and a surge in Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) costs (from $17M to $40M). Mitigation strategies include employee education, plan design changes, and negotiating with providers (e.g., Prestige ERs). The city currently pays 89% of premiums; a combination of premium adjustments and design changes is recommended. - Departmental Budgets: Ferry Martínez, Budget Director, presented the remaining 22 departments representing $173.4 million in general fund support. Highlights included: 311 customer service, downtown operations, historical preservation, planning, transportation, sustainability (reducing 3 positions), and technology services. Proposed fee increases include parking rates (up to $30 per lot) generating $670,000. The city manager’s office and council offices face 25% travel reductions. - Budget Amendments & Deficit Strategies: City Administrator Justina Tate outlined three main strategies: spending reductions without impacting priority services, using available property tax capacity (3.3% unused from prior years), and fee increases. The proposed budget assumes a 2% tax rate increase. However, amendments suggested by councilmembers total $65.2 million over two years, including a 1% tax rate reduction ($26.6 million). Potential cuts include 171 positions if the tax increase fails. The city manager clarified that if the rate increase does not receive 7 votes (60% supermajority required), he would be forced to make $75 million in additional cuts unilaterally before September 27. - Councilmember Proposals: - Councilmember Maquí Rodríguez proposed a package of amendments including using TIRZ funds, reducing the original tax increase to 1%, and restoring certain programs. He emphasized protecting vulnerable residents and avoiding across-the-board cuts. - Councilmember White opposed any property tax increase, proposing $108 million in cuts through strategic program reductions and a 2% across-the-board department cut, plus hiring 10 additional security officers. - Councilmember Mungía supported the tax increase, warning that failure would disproportionately harm districts 1-5 and lead to severe cuts. - Councilmember Spears presented two options totaling $29 million in cuts over two years, prioritizing public safety (10 security officers) and avoiding disproportionate district impacts. - Councilmember Mesa González supported fee increases (library cards, traffic fines) and opposed reducing Ready to Work funds, noting it was approved by voters. - Councilmember Castillo supported the 3% COLA and tuition reimbursement restoration, and advocated for preserving the resilience officer and cultural historian positions. - Councilmember Alderete Gabito suggested increasing the library card fee for non-residents from $20 to $25 and maximizing cost recovery for vacant lots. - Councilmember Villagrán supported the tax increase, arguing the cost to homeowners is modest ($18/month for a $1M home) and that failure would lead to 171 lost positions and reduced COLA. - Councilmember Galván supported fee increases and expressed concern about cutting Medicaid waiver funds for reproductive health, urging careful prioritization. - Health Insurance & IDR Costs: Mayor Jones asked about cost mitigation assumptions. Staff projected that engaging Prestige ERs to reduce IDR claims could save $40 million annually, but there is a five-month lag in claims reporting. Updates will be provided in December. Key Outcomes - No final vote taken: The board will reconvene on September 16, 2026, to continue deliberations and consider a revised list of amendments compiled from councilmember suggestions. - Clarification on tax rate vote: A 60% supermajority (7 votes) is required to change the tax rate. If the increase fails, the city manager must implement $75 million in additional cuts unilaterally, potentially eliminating 171 positions and reducing COLAs. - TSERS/TIRZ discussion: Councilmembers proposed using Inner City TIRZ funds for general fund relief, but staff noted this would require a change in participation rates rather than cherry-picking projects. A two-year adjustment was discussed. - Next steps: The city manager will provide a revised amendment package reflecting council feedback for the September 16 meeting. The final budget adoption is scheduled for September 17, 2026. - Adjournment: The meeting adjourned at 4:24 PM.

The City of San Antonio held a budget work session on Tuesday, September 15, 2026, at 1:03 PM. The meeting focused on employee benefits and compensation, presentations on all other departments, and initial discussions on budget amendments. City staff presented significant increases in health care costs, particularly due to out-of-network IDR claims, and proposed a combination of premium adjustments and plan design changes. Councilmembers debated potential budget amendments totaling $65.2 million over two years, including proposals to use TERS funds, adjust the property tax rate, and restore certain programs. The city manager clarified that a property tax increase requires seven votes and that failure to pass it would necessitate an additional $75 million in cuts. Discussion Items - Employee Compensation and Benefits (Renee Frieda): The city employs 13,746 authorized positions (4,800 uniformed, 8,900 civilian). Average civilian base compensation is $65,000; uniformed firefighters average $81,000; police average $85,000. Total compensation including benefits averages $95,000 for civilians and $176,000 for uniformed personnel. The proposed FY27 budget adds nearly $49 million in employee compensation, including 3% increases for civilian and LGC employees, 4% for police, and 5% for firefighters per collective bargaining agreements. Salary compression adjustments are proposed for Pay Plans A and B. - Health Care Costs and Mitigation: Medical claims are projected to increase from $138 million in FY25 to $185 million in FY26 (34% increase), and to $190 million in FY27. Out-of-network IDR claims, driven by the No Surprises Act, rose from $17 million to over $40 million. Prestige ER, operating four freestanding ERs in San Antonio, accounted for about 90% of IDR claims. Effective September 1, Prestige committed to stop challenging city claims through IDR, but savings are not yet reflected in the proposed budget. The city pursues additional strategies including legislative solutions and plan design changes. Proposed benefit reductions include tuition reimbursement ($450,000 savings), student loan repayment assistance ($525,000), and benefit value advisor ($280,000). - All Other Departments (Freddie Martinez): Presented 22 departments and offices with a combined budget of $173.4 million, covering community services, operating support, and internal services. Key proposals include: $5.5 million for 311 customer service (20 positions), $37 million for downtown operations (159 positions) including a proposed revenue adjustment for event parking rates (max $30) generating $763,000, reductions in historic preservation including reorganization of positions, $1.6 million for integrated community safety office (9 positions), $4 million for planning (23 positions, elimination of one position), $5.2 million for resilience and sustainability (reduction of three positions, elimination of $2.1 million transfer from general fund), $10.7 million for transportation (14 positions), $3.1 million for World Heritage Office (14 positions, reductions in gastronomy program and festival scope). Other departments: city auditor ($3.5M), city clerk ($9.9M including $1.6M for bond election), city manager ($4.5M, 15 positions), city attorney ($24.6M, 95 positions), communications ($9.2M, planned consolidation in FY28 saving $3.1M), government affairs ($1.9M), military/veteran affairs (elimination of Hiring Our Heroes program), mayor and council support ($18.3M, includes 4% salary adjustment for mayor/council, $40,000 reduction in support staff food, 25% reduction in travel), building and equipment services ($156.8M), finance ($34.6M, elimination of three vacant positions, fee adjustments including conduit debt issuance fee minimum of $10,000 or 0.1% and 3% credit card administrative fee), information technology ($143.5M, 356 positions), innovation ($1.6M, 8 positions), budget office ($3.4M, 20 positions), risk management ($33.3M, 29 positions, elimination of one software), non-departmental (includes 2% sales tax collection fee, $6.2M for facility maintenance, reductions in professional contracts and Travis March funding), and transfers ($4.7 million from general fund to other funds). - Budget Amendments Overview (Justina Tate): The proposed budget was presented August 13, followed by eight work sessions, 11 town halls, and two public hearings. The FY27 budget faced a $158 million shortfall, addressed through $90 million in expense reductions, property tax capacity, and fee increases. Councilmembers have proposed amendments totaling $65.2 million over two years, including a reduction to the property tax increase by 1%. Attachment 4 from the memo lists revenue adjustments suggested by councilmembers (booting fees, vacant lot abatement fees, parking fine increases, river barge ticket fee, hazmat fee) totaling $1.4 million annually. City Manager Eric Walsh emphasized that the proposed budget maintains a 5.1% revenue increase and 4.1% expense growth, shifting toward sustainability. He clarified that changing the tax rate requires 60% (7 votes) of council; if not approved, an additional $75 million in cuts over two years would be needed, bringing total cuts to $165 million. - Councilmember Proposals and Positions: - Councilmember McKee Rodriguez proposed using inner city TERS funds to cover budget items, but later clarified that since no filled positions are being eliminated (all 49 employees are being reassigned), his proposal is withdrawn. He supported attachment 4 revenue items and emphasized that a property tax increase protects vulnerable residents. - Councilmember White opposed any property tax increase, citing a $400 million general fund growth from 2022 to 2027 ($1.36B to $1.76B). He proposed closing the budget gap without a tax hike through strategic cuts, fee increases, and a 2% non-personnel reduction across departments. He also requested funding for ten additional SAFE officers (one per district) at $1.6 million, with options including reducing council office budgets by $50,000 each. - Councilmember Spears requested cost-of-service analysis for TERS and code enforcement. She supported revenue items and emphasized the need for SAFE officers, offering multiple reduction options to fund them. - Councilmember Castillo supported attachment 4 and the library fee increase. He advocated for restoring tuition reimbursement and student loan assistance, cultural historian position, resiliency position, and CIP funding. - Councilmember Galvan supported larger parts of McKee Rodriguez's proposal but expressed concerns about using Medicaid 1115 waiver reserves for reproductive justice, as it would reduce funding for oral health and other programs in future years. He opposed cutting UT San Antonio School of Public Health funding. - Councilmember Mesa Gonzalez supported revenue increases and many reductions in McKee Rodriguez's memo. She opposed using Ready to Work funds for budget balancing, noting voters approved it for workforce development. She supported library fee increase and asked about impact of proposed HOT tax changes. - Councilmember Alderete Gavito opposed all amendments adding spending, stating the need to reduce, not add. She supported attachment 4 and proposed increasing speeding ticket base fine from $100 to $200, maximizing cost recovery on vacant property fines, and extending IT equipment lifecycles. She opposed property tax increase. - Councilmember Mungia supported attachment 4, restorations in McKee Rodriguez's proposal, and reductions in public safety overtime. He warned that failing to pass the tax increase would disproportionately impact districts 1-5. - Councilmember Corr supported revenue items, Medicaid waiver for reproductive justice, CIP funding, and restoring SAEP scholarships (with city residency requirement) and the resiliency position. She did not support moving arts organizations' HOT funding. - Councilmember Via Gran encouraged unity and supported revenue items. He supported library fee increase and proposed using attachment 4 revenue for SAEP scholarships in FY27. Key Outcomes - Councilmembers generally supported the five revenue adjustments in attachment 4 (booting fees, vacant lot/dangerous premise abatement fees, parking fine increases, river barge ticket fee for non-residents, hazmat fee). These would generate $1.4 million annually ($2.8 million over two years). - The city manager will provide an updated memo tonight reflecting today's discussion, setting the framework for continued amendment discussions on September 16. - City staff will calculate the impact of reducing participation rates in TERS (inner city and midtown) to free up general fund dollars. The analysis will account for the council's previous direction on early termination of TERS. - If the property tax increase fails to receive seven votes on September 17, the city manager will be authorized to make $75 million in additional cuts to balance the budget by September 27. He indicated he will share tomorrow a list of reductions he would not recommend (e.g., traffic markings, non-service alley maintenance, Park Steward program, VITA program). - The 49 filled positions originally slated for elimination will all be placed in other positions within the city, with 24 remaining in the same job title and department, and 19 in lateral positions. No layoffs are occurring. - Council will meet again on September 16 to narrow the amendment list, with budget adoption scheduled for September 17. - City staff will provide a detailed breakdown of general fund growth from $1.36 billion (FY22) to $1.76 billion (FY27), indicating that 72% of the $400 million increase is attributable to public safety (police and fire).