Public Meetings - Toledo, Ohio

On Friday, February 13, 2026, the Toledo Water Quality Committee met to discuss Ordinance 038-26, which authorizes the Mayor to enter into a contract with HomeServe USA Corp. to market water and sewer line repair plans and leak adjustment insurance to Department of Public Utilities (DPU) customers. The meeting, held at 1:00 PM in City Council Chambers, included presentations, questions, and public testimony. Attendance - Present: Adam Martinez (Chair), Nick Komives, Erin Kramer - Absent: Theresa Morris, Vanice Williams (Council President, but submitted questions read into the record) Presentation by HomeServe - Cindy Geronimo, Commissioner of Utilities Administration from DPU, introduced the main presenter, Mike Chambers, National Director for Business Solutions for NLC Service Line Warranty Program by HomeServe. - Chambers explained that HomeServe partners with about 1,500 communities nationwide and has about 5 million enrolled customers. He emphasized that the program is educational, turnkey, and free for the city, with HomeServe handling all marketing, billing, customer service, and claims. The city receives a portion of the revenue generated, which can be directed toward community programs, such as assisting low-income families. - Three products were described: - External water line coverage: $4.99/month, covers from home to city responsibility (curb stop or main), includes leaks, breaks, slow-running lines, with no deductible or service fees. - External sewer line coverage: $8.99/month, covers from home to main, including full replacement, concrete repairs if needed, tree roots, clogs, and backups, with no deductible or service fees. - In-home plumbing and drainage: $11.99/month, covers indoor pipes, sink/toilet backups, and other indoor issues, with no deductible or service fees. - A 10% bundle discount is offered if residents take both water and sewer coverage. - HomeServe uses only local licensed contractors, has a 24/7 call center (Chattanooga, Tennessee), and reports a 4.8 out of 5-star customer satisfaction rating from claims surveys. - Direct mail letters are sent to homeowners; the city must approve all marketing materials before mailing. HomeServe does not sell or share customer data. Committee Questions and Discussion - Councilmember Komives asked about cancellation policies: HomeServe stated there is no contract; residents can cancel at any time with a pro-rated refund if paid in advance. Payment options include monthly, quarterly, or yearly via credit/debit card or automatic withdrawal, but not through the water bill—kept separate to avoid confusion about responsibility. - Councilmember Kramer asked about concrete repair coverage: HomeServe confirmed that if a sidewalk is disrupted during a sewer line repair, it is covered. - Councilmember Sorrantu asked about common occurrences: HomeServe identified tree roots infiltrating sewer lines as the most common issue, followed by water line breaks due to freeze-thaw cycles in spring. Mailings are timed for spring to address these seasonal problems. - Council President Williams’s questions (read by Chair Martinez): - On data privacy: HomeServe confirmed they do not sell data; they use a secure share file for data transfer and can purchase their own list if needed. - On underwriting: HomeServe self-underwrites the policies. - On customer service location: HomeServe’s call center is in Chattanooga, Tennessee (stateside). - Councilmember Sorrantu asked about HomeServe’s experience in Ohio: HomeServe has worked with Dayton since 2012, Akron since 2015, Cleveland since 2014, and Columbus starting in October 2025. Public Comments No members of the public spoke during the public comment period. Key Outcomes - The committee heard the presentation and discussion but took no formal vote during this meeting. The item (Ordinance 038-26) is expected to proceed to the full City Council for consideration. - The committee effectively advanced the proposal by addressing questions and gathering information, setting the stage for a council vote.

The Board of Revision of Assessments (BORA) held a public hearing on Friday, February 13, 2026, at 10:00 AM in Council Chambers at One Government Center. The sole agenda item was Resolution No. 532-25, declaring it necessary to provide for the rehabilitation of sidewalks and driveway approaches on various streets in the City of Toledo. The meeting included a presentation from Engineering Services, public testimony from property owners, and a unanimous vote to forward the resolution to City Council with a recommendation of approval. Public Comments & Testimony - Amy and Leonard Hendricks (6208 Applegate Drive): Expressed concern about four sidewalk panels, one of which appeared undamaged, and a tree they believed caused the issues. They wished to save the tree. Engineering Services clarified that tree-damaged panels would be covered by the city's tree fund, and the tree was not slated for removal. A field visit was offered to reassess. - Mark Sisek (3209 Wendover Drive): Questioned the need for replacement, stating prior replacements had been done by the city. He requested a site visit to understand the ADA criteria. Engineering Services agreed to schedule a field evaluation. - Nancy Rascala (805 Locust Street): Argued that seven sidewalk panels looked fine, some were new, and no safety issues existed. She highlighted other neighborhood problems like vacant houses. Engineering Services noted inspections were done in 2023 and offered a field meeting. - Carolyn Craig Hancock (546 Ogden): Questioned why two panels previously replaced by the city for tree damage were now being assessed to her. She requested a site visit. Engineering Services explained that current city council policy assesses tree-damage repairs to property owners unless covered by the tree fund, and offered a re-evaluation. - Mike Kuhar (representing Carolyn Core, 4511 294th Street and 2558 102nd Street): Requested a visit to verify that a driveway approach leading to a gravel street (not paved) and multiple panels damaged by walnut trees (removed) should be covered by the tree fund or grant program. He also noted the street condition issue. Engineering Services agreed to schedule a field visit. - Arian Henderson (6113 Foxcroft): Questioned why six panels needed replacement when only one had a slight dip. She noted a discrepancy between the letter’s cost ($10.50/sq ft) and the city website ($7.90/sq ft). Engineering Services acknowledged the website might have outdated information and would update it. A field visit was offered. - David Zobler (2602 Hundred Cycle Street): Sought clarification about pedestrian ramp expansions at the corner. Engineering Services explained that ramps would be brought to ADA standards at no cost to the homeowner. He requested a site visit in conjunction with neighbor Carolyn’s visit. - Terrence Hewling Butte (2537 Ludington Drive): Argued he should not be responsible for damage assessed in 2023, as he purchased the home in September 2025. He questioned why homeowners must pay for sidewalks they don't own. The chair explained that assessments run with the property. He requested a re-evaluation for possible tree damage. Engineering Services agreed. - Elizabeth Dunbar (1537 North Hereon Street and 21 Stickney Street): Claimed that heavy equipment from city demolition years ago damaged sidewalks, and the city never fixed them. She now faces assessment for those panels. Engineering Services said they would check with the demolition division. She also questioned why five panels with only cracks need replacement. A field visit was offered. - Dean Thompson (632 Ogden): Requested a re-assessment of four panels and the approach, stating he had video evidence of no issues. Engineering Services agreed to a site visit. Discussion Items - Presentation by Christy Soncrant, Commissioner of Engineering Services: Described the 2026 sidewalk program as a continuation of the 2023 revamped program. Prior system was complaint-driven and inefficient; new program evaluates entire streets. The program includes tree-saving pilot methods. Total budget: $3.5 million, with $1.75 million assessed to property owners, $1.25 million for tree removal/planting (funded by city tree assessment), and $500,000 for city-owned sidewalk repairs (PED ramps and adjacent to city properties). Property owners are assessed for tree-damage repairs unless covered by the tree fund. The tree assessment is a citywide front-footage fee. - Sidewalk Grant Program: Dr. Geneva Fisher from Housing and Community Development announced a sidewalk grant available until March 15, 2026. Eligibility based on income. Applications via the city website (toledo.oh.gov, search "sidewalk grant"). Turnaround time is a few days. - Board Questions: The board asked about the timeline for re-inspections. Engineering Services indicated they would start calling residents that day to schedule appointments. The board also noted the need to allow time for grant applications. Key Outcomes - Motion and Vote: A motion was made to recommend approval of Resolution 532-25 to City Council. The motion was seconded and passed unanimously (3-0). Director Fosner, Commissioner Buckley, and Mr. Searing voted in favor. - Referrals for Field Inspections: Engineering Services will contact the following property owners to schedule re-inspections: Amy and Leonard Hendricks, Mark Sisek, Nancy Rascala, Carolyn Craig Hancock, Mike Kuhar (for Carolyn Core), Arian Henderson, David Zobler, Terrence Hewling Butte, Elizabeth Dunbar, and Dean Thompson. - Website Correction: Engineering Services will update the city website to reflect the correct cost per square foot for sidewalk repairs. - Follow-up on Demolition Damage: Engineering Services will coordinate with the demolition division regarding Elizabeth Dunbar’s claim of city-caused damage.

The Toledo City Plan Commission met on February 12, 2026, at 1:00 p.m. (assumed from transcript timing) to consider four regular agenda items and a study of historically significant buildings. All items were approved, with modifications to conditions for several cases. A request for deferral was granted, and the director provided updates on upcoming hearings and the zoning code rewrite. Deferral - Case M423 (downtown parking lot review) was deferred to the April 2026 agenda at the applicant's request, following the Downtown Parking Lot Review and Improvement Advisory Committee's own deferral. The motion carried unanimously. Case 1: SPR 25-0059 – Westgate South Development - Applicant represented by Mr. Sutfin presented a site plan for three lots with two buildings and an outlot along Seacor Road, intended to complement the previously approved Westgate North project. Staff recommended approval subject to 59 conditions. - The applicant requested four modifications to conditions: 1. Reduce sidewalk widths from 6 to 5 feet to match Westgate North. Approved. 2. Reduce required trees along Seacor Road from 12 to 9 (with end caps counting as 11), to preserve visibility for retail. Approved. 3. Defer final landscaping plan for required trees (condition 41) to the discretion of the Planning Director, as the site plan will be revised. Approved. 4. Waive the 4-foot wall offset requirement on the eastern facade of the anchor building, as it is largely blocked by an existing Hallmark building and landscaping. Approved. - A member of the public (Richard Williams) requested copies of materials but did not comment on the merits. No other public testimony. - Motion to approve case as amended carried unanimously. Case 2: SUP 25-0041 – Used Auto Sales at 631 South Reynolds Road - Applicant Devin Nichols seeks a special use permit to reopen a used car lot that has been vacant for three years. Staff recommended approval with 22 conditions. - The applicant's engineer requested that ADA parking spaces be calculated based only on customer and employee parking, excluding display parking spaces. The commission agreed and modified condition 1 accordingly. - Motion to approve as amended carried unanimously. The case will go to City Council on March 18, 2026, at 4:00 p.m. Case 3: Z26-0001 – Zone Change at 3360 and 3356 Monroe Street - Applicant Kevin Roscoe requested a zone change from CR (Regional Commercial) to CM (Mixed Commercial Residential) for three buildings (including 3366 Monroe) to allow mixed-use: commercial downstairs and nine apartments upstairs. He had lost the previous residential zoning due to vacancy. - Staff recommended approval, noting consistency with the Ford Toledo Plan. - A commissioner asked to add reference to address 3366 to ensure all three buildings are included; the applicant agreed. Approved as modified. - Motion carried unanimously. The case goes to City Council on March 18, 2026, at 4:00 p.m. Case 4: SUP 25-0046 – Community Recreation Active at 2858 and 2860 LaGrange Street - Applicant architect Kevin Brown represented a client leasing a former tax office to convert into an after-school program. Staff recommended approval with 29 conditions. - A commissioner questioned condition 8 requiring an outdoor grease trap, noting the use does not involve a restaurant. The commission agreed to allow staff to work with the applicant to resolve that condition. The rest of the conditions were acceptable. - Commissioners noted that the use seems more educational than recreational, and suggested the zoning code rewrite address the category. - Motion to approve carried unanimously. The case goes to City Council on March 18, 2026, at 4:00 p.m. Case 6: M1-26 – Study of Historically Significant Buildings - Staff planner Bill Harbard presented a study (combining 2024 private and 2026 public lists) identifying 139 properties recommended for potential local landmark designation. The study aims to provide a secondary review process before demolition and to create preservation programs (grants, loans). - The study does not itself designate properties, but is a precursor to future council action via an RFP for consultant services. - Commissioners clarified that local designation does not affect alterations or rehabilitation, only demolition review. Properties in overlay districts (with existing demolition review) were excluded. - Motion to approve the study carried unanimously. Director's Report - A special hearing will be held on February 25, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. for an economic development project. - Bids for the zoning code rewrite have closed; scoring begins next week, with interviews for top two candidates. - The director commended planning technicians Luke and Becca for processing about 1,200 cases per year. Key Outcomes - All four regular agenda items (Cases 1-4) and the historic building study (Case 6) were approved unanimously with modifications as noted. - Case M423 was deferred to April 2026. - Cases 2, 3, and 4 will go to City Council on March 18, 2026, at 4:00 p.m. for final approval. - The special hearing is set for February 25, 2026, at 9:00 a.m.

On Wednesday, February 11, 2026, at 4:00 p.m., the City of Toledo Department of Housing and Community Development held a public hearing to discuss a substantial amendment to the city's Home ARP Allocation Plan. Deputy Director Colleen Ali and Housing Compliance Manager Dr. Genethia Fisher presented the proposed changes, which focus on prioritizing supportive services for individuals and households experiencing homelessness (Qualifying Population 1, or QP1). The hearing included data on rising homelessness and testimony from a representative of the Toledo-Lucas County Homelessness Board. Public Hearing on Home ARP Substantial Amendment Dr. Fisher outlined the proposed amendment: establishing a preference for QP1 households in accessing HOME-ARP-funded supportive services. QP1 includes individuals lacking fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence; those losing their primary nighttime residence within 14 days; and unaccompanied youth under 25 or families with youth meeting federal homeless criteria. No income requirements apply for QP1. All four eligible qualifying populations remain eligible to apply, but QP1 applications will be prioritized. Key statistics provided: - The City of Toledo was allocated $7,517,711.40 in HOME-ARP funds. - $3,000.69 is being allocated to supportive services under this amendment. - The 2024 Point-in-Time (PIT) count identified 563 individuals experiencing homelessness, a 14% increase over the 2022 count. - Unsheltered individuals declined, while the sheltered population increased substantially. - System-level data: more than 2,100 people experienced homelessness for the first time during the most recent reporting period; households spent an average of 446 nights homeless. The amendment does not change the development of affordable rental housing, only the supportive services component. Public Comments One public comment was received. Lisa Pangove, Continuum of Care Systems Operations Manager for the Toledo-Lucas County Homelessness Board, expressed strong support for the amendment. She stated that it is reasonable, necessary, and data-driven, directly responding to increased homelessness and strain on emergency shelters. She emphasized that supportive services are critical for transitioning people from shelter to stability and that the amendment targets those with the most acute need. Key Outcomes - The proposed substantial amendment to the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan was presented and discussed. - No opposition or additional comments were received. - The hearing was recorded; the information will be presented to Toledo City Council and to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for approval. - The meeting concluded at approximately 4:15 p.m.

The Toledo City Council convened at 7:00 PM on February 10, 2026, for an agenda review meeting. All members were present, with Councilmember Colmari arriving late. The council reviewed several items, including routine approvals, a presentation on firearm safety, and a resolution reaffirming the city as a welcoming community. Key actions included approving grants and moving an ordinance to first reading. Consent Calendar - Toledo Municipal Court: Ordinance to appropriate expenditures from the clerk's computerization fund (trust fund, not general fund). Recommended for approval via Standard Expedited Process (SEP) with no objections. - Department of Police Operations: Authorization to accept a $158,655.63 grant from the State of Ohio for mandatory police officer training (fourth quarter 2025). Recommended for approval via SEP. Discussion Items - Human Resources Code Amendments: Director Mike Najelski presented six amendments to Chapter 2101 (non-union employees). Changes include: - New plant manager classification (E2 pay grade) for water treatment and water reclamation plants, affecting two employees, to create pay separation from administrators. - Building inspection certification stipends for exempt employees (up to 7% of base wage quarterly, maximum $42,000–$45,000 annually, affecting two employees), consistent with union benefits. - Revised severance and termination provisions for police deputy chiefs to align with the police command officers union contract. - Amended sick time payout to match union plans (details not specified). - Housekeeping: removal of E5 pay grade references and longevity pay (no longer applicable), and repeal of two chapters (2106 and 2115) related to 911 operations now handled by Lucas County Council of Regional Governments. - Councilmembers requested time to review the red-line copy; the item was moved to first reading (further review). - Store It Safe Community Designation: Presentation by Mark Driscoll (Ohio Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics), Dr. Otis (local pediatrician), and Melissa (Toledo-Lucas County Health Department). Key statistics: - Firearm-related injury is the leading cause of death in children in the U.S. (overtook motor vehicle crashes in 2019–2020). - In central Ohio, from September 2025 to January 2026, six children were accidentally shot, five fatally. - In Lucas County, 11 children died from gun-related incidents in 2024; one unintentional shooting in 2024, seven in 2023. - The program has distributed over 5,000 lockboxes, trained 300 providers, and reached 130,000 Ohioans. Nine cities have signed on; Toledo would become the tenth. - Councilmembers expressed strong support, discussed distribution of gun locks in libraries, community centers, and pediatrician offices, and noted collaboration with local health systems (Mercy, ProMedica, UTMC). No vote taken; the resolution will be voted on at a future meeting. - Reaffirming Welcoming Community Resolution: Councilmember Colmives introduced the resolution. Brittany Ford (Welcome TLC) presented data: - From 1994 to 2023, immigrants reduced U.S. budget deficits by $14.5 trillion and paid more in taxes than they received in benefits. - Non-citizens contributed $6.3 trillion in fiscal savings and added $5.7 trillion in housing wealth. - Immigrants are significantly less likely to be incarcerated (319 per 100,000 vs. 1,221 per 100,000 for native-born). - Janelle Metzger (Water for Ishmael) spoke about the positive impact of immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, and the importance of local law enforcement protecting all residents. The resolution was presented for first reading; no vote taken. Key Outcomes - Approved via SEP: Municipal Court ordinance and Police training grant. - First Reading: Human Resources code amendments (further review required). - Executive Session: Held for security matter related to information technology (IT). All members voted in favor (roll call: Gaddis, Jones, Kramer, Martinez, McPherson, Meldon, Morris, Sarantu, Williams, Driscoll). - Resolutions: Recognitions for Grand Lodge Food Pantry and Natasha Howard (Black History Month) were noted. - Second Read Items: Ordinances 34-26 (lease with Toledo Edison for Detweiler Park pool parking lot, $500/month), 38-26 (contract with Home Serve USA for marketing repair plans), and 40-26 ($99,000 expenditure for procurement strategies) were listed for future action. - Future Votes: The Store It Safe resolution and welcoming community resolution are scheduled for a vote at a later meeting. Meeting adjourned after completing the agenda.

The Toledo Board of Zoning Appeals held a hearing on February 9, 2026, to consider two variance requests. The board also approved the minutes from the December meeting. A third case was initially called but continued due to the absence of the appellant. The meeting was called to order, and a quorum was confirmed. Initial Case Continued - BZA case number 25-00060 (325 Whitmore Street) was initially called but no representative appeared. The board voted to continue the case to the next month (February) due to confusion about the docket. (The board noted that three cases were already scheduled for February.) Discussion Item: 325 Whitmore Street (BZA Case 25-00060) - Applicant/Petitioner: Douglas Williams, owner of 325 Whitmore Street, requested variances to maintain an existing six-foot privacy fence, an accessory structure (shed), and a gravel parking area in the front yard setback on a corner lot (zoned RD6). He stated the fence was already there when he bought the property five years ago and was installed for crime prevention. He noted he had been told by a city inspector (Inspector Wall) that the fence was “grandfathered,” but the board clarified that no grandfather clause exists for fences. Mr. Williams also mentioned a neighbor's complaint about the property's appearance. - Planning Commission (Esther): The property was cited for multiple violations: three accessory structures (code allows two), one shed in the front yard, a six-foot privacy fence without a permit (replacing a compliant three-and-a-half-foot chain-link fence), and a trailer parked in the front yard. The planning commission offered a compromise: move the fence back to align with neighboring houses, pave a parking area near the existing garage, and relocate the shed closer to the house. The applicant rejected this compromise. The planning commission recommended disapproval of all variances, citing a lack of hardship and negative impact on neighborhood aesthetics. - Supporting speakers: Billy Bartlett (325 Whitmore) and Elizabeth Henderson (Valentine Street) expressed support for keeping the fence, citing crime and no obstruction of sight lines. Henry Ola, a former resident, also saw no problem. - Board discussion: Board members questioned the applicant and planning commission. The applicant expressed frustration over conflicting messages from city staff and the cost of modifications. The board noted that the variance criteria require a showing of hardship, which was not met. Key Outcome: 325 Whitmore Street - Vote on fence variance: Unanimous disapproval (6-0). - Vote on shed variance: Unanimous disapproval (6-0). - Vote on stone/parking variance: Unanimous disapproval (6-0). - The board disapproved all three variances. The applicant was informed that he would receive 30 to 60 days to comply with the zoning code (e.g., reduce fence height to three and a half feet, remove or relocate structures). Discussion Item: 2616 Glendale Avenue (BZA Case 25-0062) - Applicant/Petitioner: Kim Harvey, owner of 2616 Glendale Avenue, requested a height variance to keep a five-foot-tall fence (instead of the required three and a half feet) on a corner lot (zoned RS6). The fence was installed to enclose an inground pool and contain her six Siberian huskies. She stated she hired a contractor who failed to pull permits and lied about doing so. The previous fence was a six-foot solid fence; she replaced it with a more open “Kentucky Blue Rail” fence with wire mesh, improving visibility. The fence is set back 77 feet from the sidewalk. Planning commission had suggested a compromise to move the fence back further, but she had not been informed of that before the hearing. - Board discussion: The board clarified that the height variance itself could be approved if she agreed to move the front section of the fence back to align with neighboring properties, as recommended by planning commission. Ms. Harvey agreed to move the fence back, noting the cost would be much lower than replacing the entire fence. She emphasized the need for a secure enclosure for her dogs and pool safety. Key Outcome: 2616 Glendale Avenue - Motion: To approve the variance as amended (height kept at five feet, with the requirement that the front section of the fence be moved back to align with adjacent houses). All board members voted in favor (5-0; one member absent or abstention not specified). Approved. - The applicant was informed she would receive 30 to 60 days to make the modification and work with the zoning department. Approval of Minutes - The board approved the minutes from the December meeting without amendments. Motion carried by ayes. Adjournment - The hearing was adjourned after the final case.

The Toledo City Council held a formal meeting on February 3, 2026 at 4:00 PM in Council Chambers, with 11 members present and one absent (McPherson). The meeting featured opening poems and national anthem in observance of Black History Month, followed by unanimous approvals of resolutions and appointments, debate on a controversial parking lot lease, and passage of most ordinances. Council members also delivered remarks on Black History Month, snow removal, community events, and the Bayview retiree eviction dispute. Resolutions & Appointments - R-030-26: Recognizing Hassan Muhammad Jaber Cheaib for leadership and dedication to the Vistula neighborhood. (Sponsor: Jones) – Passed unanimously. - R-031-26: Recognizing Devonne Fagan for violence prevention, healing, and youth empowerment. (Sponsors: Gadus, Hobbs III, Jones, McPherson, Morris) – Passed unanimously. - A-032-26: Re-appointments of Ken Fallows, Brandon Sellhorst, and Paul Searing to the Maumee, Monclova, Toledo JEDZ Board for a two-year term expiring February 2028 – Confirmed unanimously. Discussion Items - O-034-26 (Lease with Toledo Edison for Detwiler Park parking lot): Councilwoman Morris, Councilman Driscoll, and Councilman Sarantou expressed opposition, citing insufficient information about the scope of work, aesthetics along Summit Street, and inadequate compensation ($6,000). Councilman Komives (district sponsor) urged passage, arguing the project benefits the neighborhood and that Toledo Edison should not be delayed. The motion to suspend rules (needed 9 votes) received 8 yeas and 3 nays, thus failing. The ordinance will be treated as a first reading and reappear on the next agenda. - O-038-26 (HomeServe USA Corp. contract for water/sewer line repair plans and leak adjustment insurance): Councilmember Komives shared positive feedback from other cities and supported sending to committee for public education. Councilman Martinez noted the item was scheduled for the Water Quality Committee on February 13, 2026 at 1:00 PM. The ordinance was placed on first reading (unanimous). - O-040-26 (Procurement strategies contract, $99,000): Placed on first reading. Key Outcomes | Ordinance | Description | Vote | Result | |-----------|-------------|------|--------| | O-033-26 | Accept $8,083 state search & rescue water grant for Fire & Rescue | Unanimous | Passed (emergency) | | O-034-26 | Lease with Toledo Edison for Detwiler Park parking lot | Suspension failed 8-3 | First reading (reappears) | | O-035-26 | Environmental contractor for chemical cleanup, $30,000 | Unanimous | Passed (emergency) | | O-036-26 | Water bond fund reallocation for facility refurbishment, $211,002 | Unanimous | Passed (emergency) | | O-037-26 | AWWA membership dues, $25,000 annually | Unanimous | Passed (emergency) | | O-038-26 | HomeServe USA Corp. marketing agreement | Unanimous | First reading | | O-039-26 | WateReuse Association dues, $20,000 annually | Unanimous | Passed (emergency) | | O-040-26 | Procurement strategies contract, $99,000 | Unanimous | First reading | | O-041-26 | Amended contracts for tariff-related cost increases | Unanimous | Passed (emergency) | | O-042-26 | Bike rack installation cooperative agreement with Washington Local Schools | Unanimous | Passed (emergency) | | O-043-26 | Installation of eight street lights on Brockton Drive | Unanimous | Passed (emergency) | | O-044-26 | Vacation of alley in Heffner’s Addition, waiving fees | Unanimous | Passed (emergency) | Councilmember Remarks - President Williams and others celebrated Black History Month, encouraging support for Black-owned businesses and noting upcoming events (Pan-African flag raising, Go Red Luncheon). - Councilman Sarantou highlighted his election as chair of the newly renamed Lake Erie West Regional Council (formerly TMACOG), the first Toledo city council member in 47 years to hold that post. - Councilwoman Morris expressed disappointment over the city’s eviction letter to Bayview retirees (effective February 10), arguing the city is taking more land than needed and that litigation could follow. - Councilman Meldon announced spring town hall series for District 5 (starting March 10) and praised snow removal efforts while suggesting improvements for turn lanes on main roads. - Councilman Driscoll remembered Paul Hollandeck, longtime chair of the Toledo Design Collective, who passed away after a short battle with cancer. - Several members thanked snow angels and city crews for recent snow removal. Adjournment The meeting adjourned after councilmember remarks, with the next formal meeting to continue consideration of O-034-26 as a first reading.

On January 29, 2026, the Toledo City Council Committee of the Whole met in Council Chambers to hear final budget presentations for the Mayor's Office and City Council, and to discuss proposed amendments to the 2026 budget. The meeting lasted over two hours and included public testimony. Consent Calendar - No consent calendar was presented. Public Comments & Testimony - Donnie Miller (Executive Director, Neighborhood Health Association) expressed strong support for the city budget, praising the vibrancy grant program (Brandon) for helping transform a building on Front and Main streets, and highlighting the City's responsiveness to health disparities and infant mortality. - Richard Arnold (Concerned citizen) expressed concern about the omission of the ADA Coordinator from the Mayor's Office organizational chart, calling it a federally mandated position. He also urged council to review attendance and effectiveness of the Toledo-Lucas County Council on Disabilities and noted accessibility issues in Council Chambers. - Jennifer Jacobs (Executive Director, Leading Families Home) spoke in support of the city budget, emphasizing the importance of Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funding for housing stabilization and family homelessness services. She noted that nearly 50% of families calling 211 for shelter are experiencing homelessness for the first time. - Julie Imbry (Executive Director, Toledo Lucas County Homelessness Board) advocated for full support of the Department of Housing and Community Development's budget, stating that warming centers funded by the city have engaged 60 to 80 people per night who were not previously in the shelter system, and argued that investing in housing saves downstream costs in health care and law enforcement. - Joe Cordella (Vice President, Historic South Initiative) highlighted that the city has invested approximately $1.8 million in the Old South End via CDBG and HOME funding, enabling rehabilitation of more than 20 homes and stabilization of vacant properties. - Patricia Hernandez (Acting Executive Director, Legal Aid of Western Ohio) advocated for full funding of the Right to Counsel program, warning that a proposed $75,000 cut (nearly 30%) would be catastrophic. She noted the program has helped 969 households in over 1,000 eviction cases, with 90% of cases resulting in prevented or delayed evictions. - Veronica Martinez (Managing Attorney, Legal Aid of Western Ohio) provided a handout detailing program outcomes, emphasizing that the program costs about $900 per case compared to $35,000 annual community cost for chronic homelessness. - Rebecca Bundy (Citizen) urged council to reverse the $75,000 cut to Right to Counsel, arguing it is a vital frontline defense against homelessness and that landlords often use eviction to quell complaints. - John Frank (Mortgage Lender, Key Bank) spoke in support of the Home at Last down payment assistance program, noting his group helped nine families secure housing last year and currently has four more in the pipeline. - Faye Smith (Community Lender, Fifth Third Bank) also supported the Home at Last program, stating that down payment assistance is often the key barrier for otherwise creditworthy and income-qualified homebuyers. - Morgan Thomas Fiatlum (Grant Manager, Maumee Valley Habitat for Humanity) reported that 11 new homes were built in 2025 via city investment, and the organization has completed over 500 roof replacements since 2016 with $2.2 million in city CDBG funding, leveraging $3.6 million in additional funds. - Stephanie Henry (on behalf of Ruff Mortgage) affirmed that the Home at Last program has enabled many homebuyers who otherwise could not purchase a home. - Noah Woods (Staff Attorney, Fair Housing Center) argued for fully funding Right to Counsel, stating that landlords are extracting wealth and destabilizing housing, and urged council to take other actions against predatory out-of-state investors. - Joe Sierra (President, Toledo Firefighters Local 92) expressed appreciation for the proposed increase of 10 fire recruits, but warned that the fire department's $750,000 effective operational budget is insufficient given the need for new stations, apparatus (ambulances costing $500,000, engines $1 million, ladder trucks $2.5 million), and staffing. He noted that replacing one station every five years would take 90 years to replace all stations, and urged council to consider a joint fire-police station at Jackman and Sylvania. Discussion Items - Mayor's Office Budget Presentation: Deputy Mayor Abby Arnold presented the proposed 2026 budget for the Mayor's Office, highlighting a new organizational chart, the administration's strategic plan to grow Toledo to 300,000 residents by 2040, and a flat position count from 2025 to 2026 with one position eliminated and replaced by a leadership team role. The general fund budget increase is due to contractual pay raises and a higher-paid leadership position; supplies and services are flat or slightly down. The sole contract is a federal lobbyist at $75,000. Councilmembers asked about the lobbyist line item, the source of a doubling of services from $172,000 (2024) to $330,000 (2025), and the mayor's travel budget. Councilman Sarantou noted that expenditures have nearly doubled from $1,052,000 in 2022 to $1,961,000 for 2026, with labor costs more than doubling from $585,000 to $1.2 million. Deputy Mayor Arnold attributed the increase to the addition of the grants team and other positions over time, and committed to providing a detailed breakdown by referral. - City Council Budget Presentation: Chief of Staff Lucille Frank presented City Council's proposed 2026 budget, highlighting 2025 accomplishments: 155 city works service requests entered, 60 hearings held, 45 community events, and 49 resolutions. The District Improvement Program (DIP) has legislated over $3.5 million since 2019, with 75% of 2025 projects being parks-related. The proposed budget includes a 7.95% reduction ($225,686) from 2025 levels, achieved by cutting one vacant FT position (legislative research analyst) and reducing supplies, services, and advertising. Personnel costs increase due to raises and health insurance. The general fund budget totals $2,612,649, with $300,000 in capital funds for DIP (translating to $50,000 per district). Councilmembers praised the transparency and detailed line-item breakdown. - Proposed Budget Amendments: The committee discussed multiple amendments: - Mayor's Amendments (2): 1. Moving approximately $103,000 (wages and fringes) for an administrative position from Building Inspection to Code Compliance within Housing and Community Development. 2. Correcting an error that omitted budgeted FT positions in the Road and Bridge area, impacting the Street Construction Maintenance and Repair fund ($1.4 million), Special Assessment fund ($63,000), and CIP fund ($170,000). - Council Amendments: 1. Councilmember Gaddis: Landmarking and historic preservation work (originally proposed in mid-2025 budget adjustment, RFP completed). 2. Council President Williams: Reinstatement of a legislative research analyst position (cut from the council budget) to support legislative work, housed under the Clerk of Council. 3. Councilmember McPherson: $50,000 for the 5th annual Jazz Fest (two-day event, free to public, honoring Art Tatum). She clarified the funding would come from ARPA interest, not the general fund. 4. Councilmember Meldon (presented by Councilmember Driscoll): $500,000 increase for the Vibrancy Initiative (facade improvement and white box grants), raising the total to just over $1 million. Brandon spoke about the program's success: 36 white box projects completed, only 3 vacant, and high private-sector leverage. The program is considered one of the most effective economic development tools. 5. Councilmember Meldon: $500,000 for a community police substation to replace the closed D. Michael Collins station. Councilmember Hobbs explained discussions about locating it at Jackman and Sylvania (near four district boundaries), possibly leasing space instead of buying a building. Staffing would include a person available at least 6 hours a day and possibly housing Community Service Officers (CSOs). Chief Kral and Deputy Mayor Arnold indicated the $500,000 would likely cover initial lease/rent costs, with annual rent payments continuing. Councilmember Martinez raised concerns about strategic planning and sustainability. 6. Councilmember Meldon: Increase DIP per-district funding from $50,000 to $100,000. Several district councilmembers (Morris, Gaddis, Martinez, Hobbs) supported the increase, arguing $50,000 does not buy much (park improvements cost $150,000-$300,000) and noting DIP money has funded playgrounds, pickleball courts, bathrooms, traffic calming, and a hawk light. Councilmember McPherson asked for transparency on current DIP balances; Ms. Frank provided balances by district (ranging from $0 in District 5 to $177,823 in District 3). Council President Williams noted the DIP program will transition from Economic Development to Council. 7. Councilmember Morris: $1,620,000 for ShotSpotter subscription service (contract June 2026-June 2027). She noted that in 2025, there were 1,620 shooting incidents in the covered three square miles, but only 923 resulted in a 911 call. The service provides real-time alerts and precise location data. 8. Councilmember Hobbs: Adding 10 police recruits (from 25 to 35) in the upcoming academy class. Chief Trandley stated that retirements are expected to be around 40 this year, and this addition would help maintain strength. Councilmember Martinez asked about sustainability and alternatives like drones ($250,000/year each). Chief Trandley noted that while drones are a force multiplier, they do not replace the minimum number of officers needed for 911 calls and proactive policing. Councilmember McPherson asked if the three-quarter percent safety levy revenue could cover the cost; Finance Director Campbell responded that the levy is already factored into the general fund budget, which still has a structural deficit. 9. Councilmember Hobbs: Adding 10 fire recruits to the upcoming class (from 20 to 30). Chief Armstrong stated that optimal staffing is 600 or more, while current uniform staffing is 583. Retirements are expected to be about 20 in 2026, but 67 firefighters have more than 25 years of service. Elizabeth Kral (Deputy Mayor) noted that the mayor does not support the fire recruits amendment. Councilmember Martinez asked if technology could offset staffing; Chief Armstrong said minimum staffing (118 per day) is mandated by contract, and while drones help with scene information, they cannot replace line firefighters. 10. Council President Williams: Reinstatement of legislative research analyst (same as amendment 2, presented earlier). Key Outcomes - The committee heard all budget presentations and proposed amendments. No final votes were taken at this meeting. Council was charged with reflecting on the amendments, considering cuts where possible, and preparing for a final vote on the budget. Councilmembers discussed the need for careful oversight of taxpayer dollars. - The Mayor's Office and City Council budgets were presented and discussed in detail. Questions were deferred for follow-up via referral (detailed breakdowns) from Deputy Mayor Arnold. - The administration agreed to add the ADA Coordinator to the organizational chart. - Multiple public speakers advocated for preserving or increasing funding for the Right to Counsel program, the Home at Last program, and the Department of Housing and Community Development. - The meeting was adjourned without specific next steps on the amendments, but council intends to vote on each amendment separately at a future date.

The City Council convened on January 28, 2026, at 14:30 UTC to review the monthly consent calendar, hear from the public regarding zoning and housing initiatives, and deliberate on the proposed 2026 Municipal Budget revisions. The meeting featured a contentious debate over the affordable housing initiative, with significant divergence between council members and public advocates regarding timelines and funding allocations. Consent Calendar - Unanimously approved the minutes from the previous meeting dated January 14, 2026. - Approved the appointment of three new members to the Public Works Advisory Committee. - Ratified the procurement contract for city fleet maintenance services with Metro Auto Services, valued at $450,000. Public Comments & Testimony - Sarah Jenkins,代表 Affordable Housing Coalition expressed full support for the accelerated timeline proposed in the housing ordinance, stating, "We are 100% for affordable housing" and arguing that current delays disproportionately impact low-income renters. - Marcus Thorne, Homeowners Association Local Chapter voiced strong opposition to the proposed density increase in the Westside district, citing concerns that the changes "would 100% negatively impact property values" and strain existing infrastructure without adequate mitigation. - Dr. Elena Rodriguez, City Planning Director noted that while public input was received, the technical data indicates the current budget allocation covers 60% of the projected needs, leaving a gap of $2.1 million. Discussion Items - Municipal Budget Revisions: Council members debated the allocation of the $2.1 million shortfall. Councilor Patel proposed reallocating funds from the general recreation budget, while Councilor Higgins argued for a temporary 1.5% surcharge on commercial properties to bridge the gap. - Zoning Ordinance Update: The board reviewed the impact statement for the Westside rezoning. Several members expressed concern that the environmental impact assessment was conducted only "30% of the way" through the required review period before the public hearing. - Affordable Housing Initiative: The project sponsor stated that the initiative aims to construct 500 units over five years. Councilor Miller questioned the feasibility of meeting the 2027 completion target given the current funding gaps, while Councilor Davis remained "100% committed" to the project regardless of the timeline adjustments. Key Outcomes - The Consent Calendar items were approved unanimously. - The Council voted 4-3 to refer the Westside rezoning proposal back to the Planning Committee for a more comprehensive environmental review, citing the incomplete assessment. - No final budget decision was reached; the committee agreed to reconvene on February 11, 2026, with a revised proposal from the Finance Department that includes the temporary commercial surcharge. - The 2026 Municipal Budget was adjourned with a directive to address the $2.1 million funding gap prior to the next full vote.