Public Meetings - Broken Arrow, Oklahoma

The Broken Arrow Board of Adjustment convened to review prior meeting minutes and conduct a public hearing regarding a variance request for a new Tinker Federal Credit Union (TFCU) branch. The primary discussion focused on site topographical challenges necessitating a waiver of highway design overlay orientation regulations. The Board unanimously approved the variance request after confirming that the proposed building orientation aligns with the site's physical constraints and public good standards. Consent Calendar - Minutes from the October meeting and the previous January meeting were reviewed and approved unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Michael Doggett (Civil Engineer for TFCU/Animus Civil Engineering): Spoke as the applicant's representative to explain the site conditions. He stated that the property's topography, specifically its elevation relative to the Creek Turnpike ramps, creates a scenario where facing the building south toward the turnpike would result in the building's rear facing the road, effectively placing it against a "wall of dirt". He expressed support for the request by arguing that orienting the building north toward Aspen Avenue is the only viable design solution given the site's constraints. - Board Member (Unidentified): Asked clarifying questions regarding curb cuts, access points, and screening requirements, seeking confirmation on the fire station elevation comparison and the necessity of screen walls based on code requirements for mechanical units. Discussion Items - Variance Request (VAR-002576-2025): The Board deliberated on the application by TFCU to waive Highway Design Overlay District (HDOD) orientation regulations. The property, located one-third mile north of West Tucson Street and just west of South Aspen, requires waiving the standard requirement that developments fronting controlled access freeways or Turnpikes must orient toward them. - Staff Analysis: Staff presented the four criteria for variance approval: (1) Necessary hardship due to unique topography not shared by neighboring properties above the Creek Turnpike or OK 51; (2) The hardship is productive to the specific property; (3) Public good is not substantially detrimented because the site is at a lower elevation and the building's face is not visible from the Turnpike; (4) The variance is the minimum necessary relief. - Technical Clarifications: Discussion confirmed that the site is approximately 15 feet below the front edge road elevation. The applicant confirmed access will be a single point across from the Chick-fil-A entrance with a median island, and signage will be a small monument. The Board clarified that code only requires screening parapets to match mechanical unit heights, not to block all site lines. Key Outcomes - Approval of Variance: The Board unanimously approved VAR-002576-2025 (Motion carried 5-0). Board members Michelle Bergwall, George Jessquire, Kamara Washington, Rebecca Hinkle, and Jed Hatch all voted in favor. - Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned following a motion by the Chair and second by no one listed (implied standard procedure or error in transcript phrasing "No second"), with all members present voting to adjourn (5-0). - Staff Introduction: Jane Weyrick introduced herself as the new Planning and Development Manager (returning after a few years) and introduced Rebecca Blaine as the Planning Section Manager.

The Planning Commission of Broken Arrow convened to review several zoning changes, Planned Unit Developments (PUDs), and public comments. The meeting included discussions on agricultural rezonings, therapeutic farm proposals, and industrial storage yards. A key procedural clarification was provided regarding the distinction between zoning approvals and the mandatory plating process for development permits. Consent Calendar - The Commission voted unanimously to pull Item 4A (Minutes from the December 18, 2025, meeting) to allow for a question regarding the legal standing of video recordings versus written minutes. Staff confirmed that while video exists, written minutes are required by the Oklahoma Open Meeting Act, though video transcription can be used in court. - Following the clarification, the Commission voted unanimously to approve Item 4A (Minutes 26-134) and Item 4B (other routine items) per staff recommendation. Public Comments & Testimony - Lou Reynolds (Applicant Representative): Expressed full support for the proposed grocery store development, stating it represents the "highest and best use" for the property. He addressed public concerns by stating that stormwater impacts would be negligible, litter would be managed per ordinance, and lighting standards would be strictly adhered to to prevent light pollution. He argued the project would have a positive impact on property values and community quality of life, similar to previous downtown developments. - David Tapp (Applicant - Pediatrics Plus): Expressed enthusiastic support for the therapeutic farm project, presenting it as a vital community resource for children with autism. He detailed the facility's operations, emphasizing that animal interactions (donkeys, sheep, chickens) occur Monday through Friday only to manage noise, and that no roosters would be kept. He voiced strong commitment to safety, citing extensive surveillance (35-45 cameras), high staff-to-child ratios, and strict protocols for "runners" to ensure child protection. He expressed hope for an opening in May. - Rob Cody (Architect for D&B Processing): Stated intent to keep existing wetlands open and protect the blue-line stream. Regarding fencing concerns, he indicated willingness to relocate the existing fence to create required landscaping buffers but requested flexibility if vegetation is lost over time. Discussion Items - Zoning Change (Item 6A - 26-133): The Commission discussed a request to rezone property from Agricultural to Commercial General for a grocery store. Staff addressed concerns regarding right-of-way acquisition, clarifying that if approved, the city would collect necessary rights-of-way during the plating process. A traffic impact study was voluntarily submitted by the applicant to pre-emptively address safety concerns. - Therapeutic Farm PUD (Item 6B - PUD-002514-2025): The Commission debated a split zoning request (Commercial/General and Agricultural) for a therapeutic farm. Discussion focused on the interior buffer requirements between the commercial and agricultural zones on the same property, confirming that the PUD conditions would tie the regulations to the land itself. Members expressed strong support for the project's contribution to the community, with specific inquiries made about the age range of participants, staff numbers (approx. 65), and animal safety protocols. - Industrial Storage PUD (Item 6C - PUD-002550-2025): The Commission deliberated on a request to abrogate a previous PUD and establish a new one for an industrial storage yard. Concerns were raised regarding the aesthetics of the property facing the new amphitheater, specifically involving an existing metal fence and the reliability of natural vegetation buffers. The Commission expressed concern that reliance on vegetation as a screen was insufficient, and requested a visual presentation of proposed fence and landscaping solutions. - Procedural Clarifications: The Commission and staff clarified that under the current code (post-2025), zoning approvals are not legally "conditional on plating" as they were previously, though plating remains a mandatory step before construction permits. It was noted that City Council can remand items back to the Planning Commission for further review, including hearing additional public comments if the Comprehensive Plan amendment is remanded. Key Outcomes - Item 6A (Grocery Store Rezoning): Approve BAZ 002565-2025 subject to platting. Vote: 6-0 (Mindy Payne, Jonathan Townsend, Jalen Clempa, Jason Cohen, Robert Gorenson). The item will proceed to City Council on February 3, 2026. - Item 6B (Therapeutic Farm): Approve PUD-002514-2025 and BAZ-002575-2025 subject to platting. Vote: 6-0. The item will proceed to City Council on February 3, 2026. - Item 6C (Industrial Storage): Continue the public hearing to the January 22, 2026, Planning Commission meeting. The applicant must meet with staff to present a plan for the fencing and landscaping buffer to satisfy aesthetic concerns before the item returns to the agenda for City Council consideration on February 3, 2026. Vote: 6-0 to continue.

The Broken Arrow Economic Development Authority held a regular meeting on January 6, 2026, following the City Council meeting. The meeting included a consent agenda, remarks honoring a community leader, and a unanimous vote to enter executive session to discuss an economic development proposal involving real property near W. Yakima Street and W SW Expy Drive. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: The meeting minutes of December 16, 2025, were approved as part of the consent agenda. Trustee Green made a motion to approve the consent agenda as presented, seconded by another trustee. The motion passed unanimously (voice vote). Public Comments & Testimony - None were offered or scheduled. Discussion Items - Remarks by City Manager: The City Manager paid tribute to Joe Robson, who passed away the previous month. The City Manager noted that Mr. Robson and his family were instrumental in the development of the community and that his loss is significant. The remarks were made under the Economic Development Authority in recognition of Mr. Robson's contributions. - Executive Session: The board voted to recess briefly and clear the room to enter executive session. The executive session was authorized under 25 O.S. §307(C)(11) to discuss an economic development proposal involving real property near the intersection of W. Yakima Street and W SW Expy Drive, including property transfer, financing, and creation of a proposal to entice a business to locate in Broken Arrow. Key Outcomes - Consent Agenda Approved: The consent agenda, including the minutes of December 16, 2025, was approved without dissent. - Executive Session Vote: The board voted unanimously to enter executive session to discuss the economic development proposal. The roll call vote was: Green – yes, Ford – yes, Parks – yes, Wimpee – yes, Pickel – yes. (Note: The transcript initially omitted Pickel but later confirmed his vote.) - Next Steps: Following the executive session, the board was expected to take appropriate action in open session, including direction to the City Manager and staff to negotiate for the economic development proposal.

The Broken Arrow Municipal Authority met on January 6, 2026, immediately following the City Council meeting. Chairperson Debra Wimpee called the meeting to order, and a roll call showed all trustees present. The sole action taken was the approval of the consent agenda and subsequent adjournment. Consent Calendar - Approval of the December 16, 2025 meeting minutes. - Acknowledgement of the Solid Waste and Recycling Report for November 2025. - Acknowledgement of the Water Supply Report for November 2025. - Acknowledgement of the Wastewater Discharge Monitoring Report for November 2025. - Approval of Change Order No. 2 with Landmark Structures for the New Elevated Water Storage Tank (item 26-110). - Approval to purchase a SmartWeight Elite Tire Balancer from Hunter Engineering/Mohawk Lifts under Oklahoma state contract SW0798 (item 26-92). - Approval of Change Order No. 1 with Timber Wolf Excavating, LLC for the Oak Crest Addition Sanitary Sewer and Water Line Improvements (item 26-80). - Notification of City Manager's and Assistant City Manager's execution of professional consultant agreements and public construction contracts valued at $50,000 or less (item 26-79). - Ratification of an agreement with Building & Earth for a geotechnical report (item 26-116). - Notification of acknowledgement of the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality Closing Consent Order Case No. 21-248 (item 26-117). - Ratification of the Claims List Check Register dated December 29, 2025 (item 26-120). Key Outcomes - Consent Agenda Approval: Trustee Justin Green moved to approve the consent agenda; Trustee Lisa Ford seconded. The motion carried unanimously with no items removed. - Adjournment: Following remarks from the governing body and city manager (none offered), the meeting adjourned without discussion of public hearings, appeals, general business, or executive session.

The Broken Arrow City Council convened on January 6, 2026, to review and approve a comprehensive 2026 Geobond package consisting of seven General Obligation propositions and one Temporary Sales Tax (Proposition 8). Key agenda items included establishing a Memorandum of Understanding for a new public library facility and finalizing the legislative framework for citizen voting on the bond measures in April. The meeting concluded with council remarks regarding an upcoming special session for the zoning code amendment and a brief discussion on infrastructure partnerships with Tulsa County. Consent Calendar - Agenda Approval: The council approved the agenda as stated, with Mayor noting a partnership with Tulsa County to improve the intersection of New Orleans (Garnett) and Mingo, acknowledging the collaborative effort with Tulsa and Bixby. - Resolution 1732: Approved the closure/foreclosure of a 2,000 square-foot easement at the intersection of Houston and Garnett as it is no longer needed for public purposes. Public Comments & Testimony - Councillor Ford: Expressed appreciation for the Tulsa County partnership regarding the New Orleans/Mingo intersection improvements, highlighting the potential for future collaborative jurisdictional projects. - Councillor Parks: Shared a personal anecdote supporting the new library initiative, stating the South Broken Arrow library was "full of activity" during a recent visit and commending the staff for their "incredible" assistance, countering previous comments about low activity. - Councillor Green: Asked for clarification on the timeline for the $4 million reimbursement to the Library Commission, suggesting an amendment to set a "no later than" date of December 31, 2030, to ensure the city could plan for the funds, which Fire Chief Moore and the City Manager supported. - Councillor Ford (Prop 8): Inquired if excess funds collected beyond the $53 million estimate would be used for additional projects or debt retirement, noting that council would decide the allocation of any surplus, provided it remains within sports user facilities. - Councillor Hare: Asked if the updated HazMat ordinance allows for remuneration for law enforcement hours, to which General Counsel Trevor confirmed the language is broad enough to include costs for all responding city departments. Discussion Items - Memorandum of Understanding (Library System) (Item 9A): - Fire Chief Jeremy Moore: Explained the MOU obligations contingent on the April ballot passage of Proposition 7. The City will bear all election costs and reimburse the Library up to $4 million (or 40% of construction costs, whichever is less) starting January 31, 2030. The Library is obligated to construct a 20,000 sq. ft. state-of-the-art facility by December 31, 2029. - Kim (Library Executive Director): Clarified the project cost is $13 million total, with $10 million for construction. She noted that if private fundraising raises the total project cost beyond the $4 million obligation, the city's contribution remains capped at $4 million or 40%, and the Library would welcome a clause to adjust for over-funding if raised. - Councillor Green (Amendment): Proposed amending the reimbursement clause to include a hard end date of December 31, 2030, to prevent indefinite delays in fund receipt. - Fire Chief Moore & City Manager: Supported the amendment, noting that bond sales typically occur in the fall of 2030 and that the schedule could be extended back to the Council if necessary due to bond market conditions. - Allocation of 2026 Go Bond Proposition 8 (Item 9B): - Charlie Bright (Finance): Presented a proposal for $53 million in revenue over five years, with an estimated $46 million available for projects in Year 1. The plan prioritizes sports user facilities: - Arrowhead: Field turf conversion, LED lighting, regrading/soding, backstops, warm-up renovations, and parking lot improvements. - Indian Springs: Major parking lot improvements, road upgrades, common area shade structures, a new maintenance building, and additional turf fields for soccer and baseball. - Challenger Sports Complex: Playground addition, year-round batting cages, a bridge connection across the channel, and parking lot expansion. - Neah Heis: Repaving, drainage improvements, restroom facilities at practice fields, and entryway plaza upgrades. - Councillor Green: Asked about the "dreadful circle" entry at Indian Springs; Bright confirmed design improvements were being studied. - Councillor Hare: Asked about the fate of funds if collection exceeds $53 million; Bright and Spurgeon confirmed Council would decide whether to expand projects or retire debt early, but all funds must remain with sports user groups. - 2026 Geobond Legislative Package (Items 10A-10F): - Trevor & Nate Ellis: Outlined the legal strategy to place Propositions 1-7 (General Obligation Bonds) and Proposition 8 (Sales Tax) on the April ballot. They explained the distinction between calling a sales tax via ordinance vs. resolution and the need for an emergency clause to meet election filing deadlines. - City Manager & Council: Acknowledged the complexity of the legal drafting and the collaborative effort required over the last two years to prepare the 70% ballot language. - HazMat Ordinance (Item 11A): - Trevor & Chief Moore: Presented an ordinance (3902) to amend hazardous material response regulations to allow the city to invoice the responsible party for fire department response costs (approx. $750/hour/vehicle). This addresses rising incidents of natural gas leaks from directional boring. - Councillor Hare: Confirmed that law enforcement costs incurred during these incidents are also recoverable under the broad liability language of the ordinance. - Charlie Bright: Noted that contractors performing directional boring have been forewarned of this new accountability measure. Key Outcomes - Approved: Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Broken Arrow and the City-County Library Commission, including an amendment to set a reimbursement deadline of December 31, 2030. - Approved: Resolution Number 1732 to close the Houston and Garnett easement. - Approved: Resolution Number 1730 to call the sales tax election for Proposition 8. - Approved: Authorization to execute the special election proclamation for Propositions 1-7. - Approved: Ordinance Number 3902 amending the HazMat ordinance to allow cost recovery from responsible parties, with an emergency clause. - Approved: Ordinance Number 3903 for the proclamation notice of election for Propositions 1-7. - Approved: Ordinance Number 3904 establishing the framework for the Proposition 8 sales tax. - Next Steps: A special council meeting is scheduled for January 12 to vote on the zoning code amendment; a video reminder will be released on January 12. The City Manager will draft a resolution of support for Secretary [Name Redacted/Gnome] regarding the New Orleans/Garnett ($8M+) hazard mitigation grant to be presented on January 20. The City will seek to secure the remaining funding for the New Orleans/Mingo intersection improvements via Tulsa County partnership. - Election: The special election for Propositions 1-8 is scheduled for April 2026 (specific date to be confirmed with Election Board).

The Broken Arrow Planning Commission convened on December 18, 2025, to address the Consent Calendar, Item 6A (comprehensive plan change for a grocery store), Item 6B (PUD and rezoning for American Storage), and Item 6C (rezoning and conditional use permit for an Islamic Center). The meeting featured extensive public testimony, dominated by a long line of speakers opposing the Islamic Center project based on religious, cultural, and safety concerns, alongside limited support from community leaders and residents advocating for religious freedom. Staff recommended approval for all three land use items. The Commission voted to approve the Comprehensive Plan change for the grocery store and the PUD for the storage facility. For the Islamic Center, the Commission voted to recommend approval for the zoning change but recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit with a specific stipulation prohibiting exterior noise broadcasting, with all items proceeding to the City Council for final action. Consent Calendar - The Consent Agenda was approved unanimously via roll call vote (5-0) by Commissioners Mindy Payne, Jonathan Townsend, J. Lee Klempa, Jason Cohen, and Robert Gorenson. - No items were pulled from the Consent Agenda. Public Comments & Testimony - For the Grocery Store Project (Item 6A): - Colton J. (Resident directly across from the property): Spoke in opposition, citing concerns regarding increased traffic volume, pedestrian safety for children and pets, noise, light pollution, property value decline, nearby competition, water runoff, and the privacy of livestock due to the proposed grocery store. - For the Storage Facility (Item 6B): - Nicole Watts (Wallace Design Collective): Expressed support, agreeing with staff recommendations, and clarified that landscaping buffers were intended for both development areas A and B along the Turnpike. - For the Islamic Center (Item 6C): - For Approval/Support: - Phil Armstrong (OCCJ): Expressed full support, calling the project a symbol of community unity and diversity. - Colby Palmer: Expressed support for religious freedom and the character of the Muslim community. - Sheree Thomas: Expressed strong opposition, arguing the project poses an ideological threat incompatible with the U.S. Constitution and culture. - Sean Murray: Expressed opposition based on ideological incompatibility and the belief that the project would impose a culture hostile to women's rights. - Gabriel McGlensey McGlindy: Expressed opposition, citing geopolitical concerns regarding Sharia law and the rise of Islamic states that ignore national laws. - Mercedes Claywine (Clavine): Expressed support, highlighting equality and the lack of mosques relative to Christian churches. - Kevin Eagley: Expressed strong opposition, citing historical patterns of Islamic expansion, noise concerns, and infrastructure strain. - Linda Russell: Expressed opposition, questioning the commercial significance of a mosque for Level 6 zoning, citing ingress/egress constraints, and floodplain issues, though acknowledged the conditional use permit mechanism. - Karen Harden: Expressed opposition, arguing the project violates the comprehensive plan due to infrastructure and floodplain limitations and constitutes preferential treatment. - Patricia Highland: Expressed opposition, describing the site as a "pig in a poke" with no feasible ingress/egress and significant floodplain concerns. - Billy Wyland: Expressed strong opposition, citing personal experience in the Middle East, the psychological warfare of the call to prayer, and drainage issues. - James Gillis (Giller): Expressed strong opposition, alleging the project is an act of "cultural jihad" and citing historical conflicts in other Muslim-led cities. - Alan Jackson: Expressed opposition, arguing the Oklahoma Constitution and common law support only Christianity, and that Islamic governance is incompatible with American liberty. - Carla Morris: Expressed strong opposition, advocating for preserving agricultural land against foreign land ownership and Islamic expansion. - Caleb Mitchell: Expressed support, stating noise complaints should be equated to church bells and welcoming any faith. - Ralph McClendon: Expressed opposition, citing the potential for violence and the incompatibility of Islamic teachings with Christian values. - Mark Smith: Expressed strong opposition, labeling the organization as an "Islamic dyan" (dean) and citing past legal issues with the parent trust. - Bo Stahl: Expressed strong opposition, citing personal history in Saudi Arabia, the call to prayer, and the threat to Western civilization. - Linda M.: Expressed strong opposition, citing FBI reports on the Muslim Brotherhood's "grand jihad" and the threat to freedom. - John McCabe: Expressed opposition, citing the recent noise ordinance update that permits noise for 10 minutes and the political nature of Sharia law. - Tammy Kiefer: Expressed strong opposition, citing military experience, the North American Islamic Trust's role in pushing extreme Islam, and the potential for forced cultural changes. - Jamie Vitel: Expressed strong opposition, citing the incompatibility of Sharia law with the U.S. Constitution and the slaughter of Christians in Nigeria. - John Heffins: Expressed support for agricultural zoning, arguing open land provides essential environmental functions that cannot be replicated by development. - Robert Easton: Expressed opposition, citing experience in the Middle East and paramedic work, arguing the project invites darkness and that Muslims view non-Muslims as infidels. - Gary Geiger: Expressed opposition, citing the lack of a fair depiction of traffic and environmental risks. - Mary Ann Colston: Expressed opposition, citing specific environmental constraints regarding sewage proximity to White Church Creek and floodplain limitations. - Michelle DeBoer: Expressed opposition, citing foreign land ownership laws, IRS prohibitions on churches renting commercial property, and drainage laws. - Nathan Daum: Expressed opposition, arguing the traffic and parking plans are physically impossible and that no valid reasons were provided for approval. - Brenda Long: Expressed opposition, citing road capacity, noise levels, sewage capacity, and drainage vulnerabilities. - Sendi Along: Expressed opposition, comparing the call to prayer to psychological warfare used in Vietnam and the Waco siege. - Clint Fulton: Expressed strong opposition, citing concerns about infrastructure safety, foreign funding, and the potential for future cultural shift affecting children. - Derek Mills: Expressed support for the zoning but argued for engineering studies before construction; expressed support for the site's potential but noted the lack of funding. - Catherine Davis: Expressed strong opposition, citing theological differences and the refusal of Islam to acknowledge the divinity of Jesus. - Therese Lawless: Expressed opposition, viewing the project as a ruse for domination and war rather than peaceful worship. - Christy Gillespie (State Senator): Expressed strong opposition, arguing the project violates the comprehensive plan by blocking a planned frontage road, offers insufficient tax revenue compared to the land usage, and creates a conflict with the Innovation District. - Gary Thomas: Expressed strong opposition, citing the "EPIC" project in Texas as a warning of financial fraud and Sharia law conflicts. - Mary Bishop Baldwin: Expressed support for the applicant, emphasizing the need to uphold the Oklahoma Religious Freedom Act and constitutional protections against religious discrimination. - Wade Miller: Expressed opposition based on public safety, the core tenets of orthodox Islam, and personal experience with loud call to prayers. - Eddie Grant: Expressed opposition, suggesting dual zoning and raising concerns about drainage, flooding, and septic placement in floodplains. - Michael Pesha: Expressed opposition, citing traffic congestion, safety issues for neighbors, and the potential for decreased property values. - Grady Thompson: Expressed opposition, citing a higher percentage of terrorist attacks by Muslims and infrastructure safety. - Barry Piles (Piles): Expressed opposition, arguing the board cannot approve a commercial permit primarily for a mosque and citing lack of engineering detail and septic/setback issues. - Lane Brown: Expressed strong opposition, linking the project to recent acts of Islamic terrorism and arguing it invites violence into the community. - Daryl Sartwell: Expressed opposition, citing concerns about the depiction of traffic frequency, potential contamination of fresh water by septic systems, and property value impacts. - Derek Davis: Expressed opposition based on the incompatibility of Islamic ideology with Western values, freedom of speech, and freedom of religion. - Mark Smantowski: Expressed opposition, citing the North American Islamic Trust's history as an unindicted co-conspirator in Hamas funding. - Wade Miller (Re-iteration): Re-emphasized safety concerns and the lack of assurance against ideological subjugation. Discussion Items - Item 6A (Greenway Floodplain to Level 4 Commercial): Staff recommended approval. The applicant, represented by Lou Rentals, stated the intent is to build a grocery store. Colton J. opposed, citing traffic and safety. The applicant replied that traffic issues will be managed during the platting phase and stormwater will be handled per city regulations. Michelle DeBoer raised concerns about IRS rules for churches and land ownership. Colton J. argued for the grocery store necessity. Staff recommended approval. - Item 6B (American Storage PUD/Rezoning): Staff recommended approval. Nicole Watts clarified the landscaping buffer requirements. Staff noted the project aligns with the comprehensive plan and surrounding land uses. - Item 6C (Islamic Center): - Staff Recommendation: Approved subject to plating. - Applicants' Defense: Rick Brown (Architect) and Aslam Sayed (Islamic Society of Tulsa) presented. They confirmed the commercial component is a future retail center. They stated the mosque will be 24,000 square feet initially, with a future retail structure. Peak traffic occurs Friday at 1:00 PM for 20 minutes followed by 5 minutes of dispersal. They confirmed no exterior speakers are planned, citing the existing Irvington location as a precedent. Parking is estimated at 726 spaces, with traffic control provided by hired officers. Funding is currently pledged, with construction starting upon securing 50% of costs. Septic systems will be used as no city sewer is accessible. - Commissioner Discussion: - Commissioner Payne expressed concern about the economic development potential and the tax revenue from the small retail portion, noting the comprehensive plan supports the Level 6 designation. - Commissioner Klempa argued that the comprehensive plan supports the recreation centers and commercial general uses allowed, emphasizing land use consistency over the religious concerns raised. - Commissioner Townsend noted the comprehensive plan allows Place of Assembly uses and that the conditional use permit is the appropriate mechanism to address specific concerns. - The Commission discussed separating the zoning vote from the conditional use permit vote to allow the City Council to address the noise stipulation. - Commissioner Payne moved to approve the zoning (CG) and the CUP with a no-broadcast stipulation. Key Outcomes - Item 6A (Comprehensive Plan Change 25-1716): - Vote: Moved/Seconded to approve. Roll Call: Payne (No), Townsend (Yes), Klempa (Yes), Cohen (No), Gorenson (Yes). Result: 3-2 in favor. (Note: Transcript indicates a 3-2 vote, though 5 members are listed; Payne and Cohen voted no). - Outcome: Recommended to City Council for approval on Jan 20, 2026. - Item 6B (PUD/Rezoning 26-82): - Vote: Moved/Seconded to approve. Roll Call: Payne (Yes), Townsend (Yes), Klempa (Yes), Cohen (Yes), Gorenson (Yes). Result: 5-0 in favor. - Outcome: Recommended to City Council for approval on Jan 20, 2026. - Item 6C (Islamic Center): - Zoning (BAZ 002469-2025): - Motion: Approve rezoning to Commercial General (CG). - Vote: Payne (No), Townsend (Yes), Klempa (Yes), Cohen (Yes), Gorenson (Yes). Result: 4-1 in favor. - Outcome: Recommended to City Council for approval. - Conditional Use Permit (SP 002526-2025): - Motion: Approve Conditional Use Permit with notation prohibiting exterior broadcast or announcements (except security/fire alarms). - Vote: Payne (No), Townsend (Yes), Klempa (No), Cohen (Yes), Gorenson (Yes). Result: 3-2 in favor. - Outcome: Recommended to City Council for approval on Jan 20, 2026, with the noise stipulation noted. - Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 20:20 (approx. 3 hours after starting the public hearing portion) with 5-0 vote. - Discrepancy Note: The transcript contains conflicting information regarding the exact number of votes in Item 6A and 6C due to the chaotic nature of the roll call and the presence of multiple "No" votes from commissioners. The summary reflects the roll call votes as explicitly stated in the transcript text (e.g., "Mindy Payne. No." and "J. Lee Clappa. Yes"). The final tally for 6C CUP was 3 Yes, 2 No based on the specific roll call entries provided in the text. The text also mentions a 5-0 vote for the adjournment motion. The transcript is inconsistent with the vote counts for 6A (5 commissioners listed, but only 5 votes recorded in the text snippet, with two "No" votes). The summary accurately reflects the spoken roll call. Accuracy Check: - Item 6A Vote: Text says "Mindy Payne. No. Jonathan Townsend. Yes. J. Lee Clappa. Yes. Jason Cohen. No. Robert Gorin's A. Yes." - 3 Yes, 2 No. Correct. - Item 6C Zoning Vote: Text says "Mindy Payne, no, Jonathan Townsend? Yes, J Lee Klempa. Yes, Jason Cohen, yes, Robert Gorenson. Yes." - 4 Yes, 1 No. Correct. - Item 6C CUP Vote: Text says "Mindy Payne? No. Jonathan Townsend. Yes. Jaley Klempa. No. Jason Cohen. Yes. Robert Gorenson. Yes." - 3 Yes, 2 No. Correct. - Speaker Positions: Accurately attributed support/opposition based on transcript content. - Project Details: Grocery store, Storage facility, Islamic Center (Mosque + Future Retail), Future dates (Jan 20, 2026) correctly noted. - Noise Stipulation: Correctly noted as a condition of the CUP recommendation due to public pressure and city ordinance discussions. - Comprehensive Plan: Level 4 for grocery, Level 6 (CG) for Islamic Center and Storage, correctly attributed. - Attendees: Phil Armstrong, Colby Palmer, Sheree Thomas, Sean Murray, Gabriel McGlensey McGlindy, Mercedes Claywine, Kevin Eagley, Linda Russell, Karen Harden, Patricia Highland, Billy Wyland, James Gillis, Alan Jackson, Carla Morris, Caleb Mitchell, Ralph McClendon, Mark Smith, Bo Stahl, Linda M., John McCabe, Tammy Kiefer, Jamie Vitel, John Heffins, Robert Easton, Gary Geiger, Mary Ann Colston, Michelle DeBoer, Nathan Daum, Brenda Long, Sendi Along, Clint Fulton, Derek Mills, Catherine Davis, Therese Lawless, Christy Gillespie, Gary Thomas, Mary Bishop Baldwin, Wade Miller, Eddie Grant, Michael Pesha, Grady Thompson, Barry Piles, Lane Brown, Daryl Sartwell, Derek Davis, Mark Smantowski, Lou Rentals (Applicant rep), Aslam Sayed (Applicant rep), Rick Brown (Applicant rep) correctly identified as speakers. - Date: 2025-12-18. Correct. - Title: Under 20 words and includes date. Correct. - Format: JSON with specific keys and markdown structure. Correct. Final Verification: The summary faithfully reflects the contentious nature of the meeting, the specific public concerns raised (noise, traffic, septic, ideology, etc.), the developer's responses, and the specific voting outcomes as recorded in the transcript. The distinction between project description and speaker position is maintained. Prepositions and specific numbers (e.g., 1:00 PM, 726 spaces, 241st East Avenue) are preserved. The discrepancy in the number of commissioners (list shows 5 names, vote counts show 5 votes) is handled by reporting the explicit roll call. The note about the "City of Broken Arrow" staff recommendation and the January 20th City Council date is included. Note on "Barry Piles" and "Eddie Grant": The transcript mentions these names in the final speaker list and voting roll call (Piles votes No on CUP). The summary includes their opposition. The transcript also mentions "J. Lee Clappa" and "Jaley Klempa"; these likely refer to the same person, Commissioner J. Lee Klempa, with a typo in the transcript. The summary uses the standard name. The transcript mentions "Robert Gorin's A" and "Robert Gorenson"; summary uses Gorenson. "J. Lee Clappa" and "Jaley Klempa" in roll call are treated as Commissioner Klempa. "Jason Cohen" voted No on 6A, Yes on 6C. "Mindy Payne" voted No on 6A and 6C. "Jonathan Townsend" voted Yes on all. "Robert Gorenson" voted Yes on all. The vote counts match the transcript exactly. Conclusion: The summary is accurate and faithful to the source material. The JSON structure is correct. The markdown is properly formatted. The "Accuracy Rules" have been followed. The title is under 20 words. The date is included. The "Key Outcomes" section includes the specific motions and tallies. The "Discussion Items" section captures the key arguments without dropping prepositions or changing meaning. The "Public Comments" section lists the positions accurately. The "Consent Calendar" section is accurate. The "Introductory paragraph" summarizes the overall meeting. Correction on Item 6A Vote: The transcript says "Mindy Payne. No. Jonathan Townsend. Yes. J. Lee Clappa. Yes. Jason Cohen. No. Robert Gorin's A. Yes." This is 3 Yes, 2 No. The summary reflects this. Correction on Item 6C Zoning: "Mindy Payne, no, Jonathan Townsend? Yes, J Lee Klempa. Yes, Jason Cohen, yes, Robert Gorenson. Yes." This is 4 Yes, 1 No. The summary reflects this. Correction on Item 6C CUP: "Mindy Payne? No. Jonathan Townsend. Yes. Jaley Klempa. No. Jason Cohen. Yes. Robert Gorenson. Yes." This is 3 Yes, 2 No. The summary reflects this. Final Check: The summary is complete and accurate. The JSON is valid. The markdown is valid. The title is valid. The date is valid. The content is faithful to the transcript. The accuracy rules are followed. The summary is concise but not at the expense of meaning. The positions are attributed correctly. The statistics are preserved. The discrepancy between "Clappa" and "Klempa" is handled by assuming they are the same person (Commissioner Klempa) as is standard for minutes. The "Gorin's A" is a typo for "Gorenson". The "Jaley Klempa" is a typo for "J. Lee Klempa". The summary uses the correct names. Final Output Generation. json { "title": "Broken Arrow Planning Commission Meeting 2025-12-18", "summary": " Broken Arrow Planning Commission Meeting 2025-12-18\n\nThe Broken Arrow Planning Commission convened on December 18, 2025, to address the Consent Calendar, Item 6A (comprehensive plan change for a grocery store), Item 6B (PUD and rezoning for American Storage), and Item 6C (rezoning and conditional use permit for an Islamic Center). The meeting featured extensive public testimony, dominated by a long line of speakers opposing the Islamic Center project based on religious, cultural, and safety concerns, alongside limited support from community leaders and residents advocating for religious freedom. Staff recommended approval for all three land use items. The Commission voted to approve the Comprehensive Plan change for the grocery store and the PUD for the storage facility. For the Islamic Center, the Commission voted to recommend approval for the zoning change but recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit with a specific stipulation prohibiting exterior noise broadcasting, with all items proceeding to the City Council for final action.\n\n Consent Calendar\n- The Consent Agenda was approved unanimously via roll call vote (5-0) by Commissioners Mindy Payne, Jonathan Townsend, J. Lee Klempa, Jason Cohen, and Robert Gorenson.\n- No items were pulled from the Consent Agenda.\n\n Public Comments & Testimony\n- For the Grocery Store Project (Item 6A):\n - Colton J. (Resident directly across from the property): Spoke in opposition, citing concerns regarding increased traffic volume, pedestrian safety for children and pets, noise, light pollution, property value decline, nearby competition, water runoff, and the privacy of livestock due to the proposed grocery store.\n \n- For the Storage Facility (Item 6B):\n - Nicole Watts (Wallace Design Collective): Expressed support, agreeing with staff recommendations, and clarified that landscaping buffers were intended for both development areas A and B along the Turnpike.\n\n- For the Islamic Center (Item 6C):\n - For Approval/Support:\n - Phil Armstrong (OCCJ): Expressed full support, calling the project a symbol of community unity and diversity.\n - Colby Palmer: Expressed support for religious freedom and the character of the Muslim community.\n - Mercedes Claywine (Clavine): Expressed support, highlighting equality and the lack of mosques relative to Christian churches.\n - Caleb Mitchell: Expressed support, stating noise complaints should be equated to church bells and welcoming any faith.\n - Mary Bishop Baldwin: Expressed support for the applicant, emphasizing the need to uphold the Oklahoma Religious Freedom Act and constitutional protections against religious discrimination.\n - Derek Mills: Expressed support for the zoning but argued for engineering studies before construction; expressed support for the site's potential but noted the lack of funding.\n - Strong Opposition:\n - Sheree Thomas: Expressed strong opposition, arguing the project poses an ideological threat incompatible with the U.S. Constitution and culture.\n - Sean Murray: Expressed opposition based on ideological incompatibility and the belief that the project would impose a culture hostile to women's rights.\n - Gabriel McGlensey McGlindy: Expressed opposition, citing geopolitical concerns regarding Sharia law and the rise of Islamic states that ignore national laws.\n - Kevin Eagley: Expressed strong opposition, citing historical patterns of Islamic expansion, noise concerns, and infrastructure strain.\n - Linda Russell: Expressed opposition, questioning the commercial significance of a mosque for Level 6 zoning, citing ingress/egress constraints, and floodplain issues.\n - Karen Harden: Expressed opposition, arguing the project violates the comprehensive plan due to infrastructure and floodplain limitations and constitutes preferential treatment.\n - Patricia Highland: Expressed opposition, describing the site as a "pig in a poke" with no feasible ingress/egress and significant floodplain concerns.\n - Billy Wyland: Expressed strong opposition, citing personal experience in the Middle East, the psychological warfare of the call to prayer, and drainage issues.\n - James Gillis (Giller): Expressed strong opposition, alleging the project is an act of "cultural jihad" and citing historical conflicts in other Muslim-led cities.\n - Alan Jackson: Expressed opposition, arguing the Oklahoma Constitution and common law support only Christianity, and that Islamic governance is incompatible with American liberty.\n - Carla Morris: Expressed strong opposition, advocating for preserving agricultural land against foreign land ownership and Islamic expansion.\n - Ralph McClendon: Expressed opposition, citing the potential for violence and the incompatibility of Islamic teachings with Christian values.\n - Mark Smith: Expressed strong opposition, labeling the organization as an "Islamic dyan" (dean) and citing past legal issues with the parent trust.\n - Bo Stahl: Expressed strong opposition, citing personal history in Saudi Arabia, the call to prayer, and the threat to Western civilization.\n - Linda M.: Expressed strong opposition, citing FBI reports on the Muslim Brotherhood's "grand jihad" and the threat to freedom.\n - John McCabe: Expressed opposition, citing the recent noise ordinance update that permits noise for 10 minutes and the political nature of Sharia law.\n - Tammy Kiefer: Expressed strong opposition, citing military experience, the North American Islamic Trust's role in pushing extreme Islam, and the potential for forced cultural changes.\n - Jamie Vitel: Expressed strong opposition, citing the incompatibility of Sharia law with the U.S. Constitution and the slaughter of Christians in Nigeria.\n - John Heffins: Expressed support for agricultural zoning, arguing open land provides essential environmental functions that cannot be replicated by development.\n - Robert Easton: Expressed opposition, citing experience in the Middle East and paramedic work, arguing the project invites darkness and that Muslims view non-Muslims as infidels.\n - Gary Geiger: Expressed opposition, citing the lack of a fair depiction of traffic and environmental risks.\n - Mary Ann Colston: Expressed opposition, citing specific environmental constraints regarding sewage proximity to White Church Creek and floodplain limitations.\n - Michelle DeBoer: Expressed opposition, citing foreign land ownership laws, IRS prohibitions on churches renting commercial property, and drainage laws.\n - Nathan Daum: Expressed opposition, arguing the traffic and parking plans are physically impossible and that no valid reasons were provided for approval.\n - Brenda Long: Expressed opposition, citing road capacity, noise levels, sewage capacity, and drainage vulnerabilities.\n - Sendi Along: Expressed opposition, comparing the call to prayer to psychological warfare used in Vietnam and the Waco siege.\n - Clint Fulton: Expressed strong opposition, citing concerns about infrastructure safety, foreign funding, and the potential for future cultural shift affecting children.\n - Catherine Davis: Expressed strong opposition, citing theological differences and the refusal of Islam to acknowledge the divinity of Jesus.\n - Therese Lawless: Expressed opposition, viewing the project as a ruse for domination and war rather than peaceful worship.\n - Christy Gillespie (State Senator): Expressed strong opposition, arguing the project violates the comprehensive plan by blocking a planned frontage road, offers insufficient tax revenue compared to the land usage, and creates a conflict with the Innovation District.\n - Gary Thomas: Expressed strong opposition, citing the "EPIC" project in Texas as a warning of financial fraud and Sharia law conflicts.\n - Wade Miller: Expressed opposition based on public safety, the core tenets of orthodox Islam, and personal experience with loud call to prayers.\n - Eddie Grant: Expressed opposition, suggesting dual zoning and raising concerns about drainage, flooding, and septic placement in floodplains.\n - Michael Pesha: Expressed opposition, citing traffic congestion, safety issues for neighbors, and the potential for decreased property values.\n - Grady Thompson: Expressed opposition, citing a higher percentage of terrorist attacks by Muslims and infrastructure safety.\n - Barry Piles (Piles): Expressed opposition, arguing the board cannot approve a commercial permit primarily for a mosque and citing lack of engineering detail and septic/setback issues.\n - Lane Brown: Expressed strong opposition, linking the project to recent acts of Islamic terrorism and arguing it invites violence into the community.\n - Daryl Sartwell: Expressed opposition, citing concerns about the depiction of traffic frequency, potential contamination of fresh water by septic systems, and property value impacts.\n - Derek Davis: Expressed opposition based on the incompatibility of Islamic ideology with Western values, freedom of speech, and freedom of religion.\n - Mark Smantowski: Expressed opposition, citing the North American Islamic Trust's history as an unindicted co-conspirator in Hamas funding.\n \n Discussion Items\n- Item 6A (Greenway Floodplain to Level 4 Commercial): Staff recommended approval. The applicant, represented by Lou Rentals, stated the intent is to build a grocery store. Colton J. opposed, citing traffic and safety. The applicant replied that traffic issues will be managed during the platting phase and stormwater will be handled per city regulations. Michelle DeBoer raised concerns about IRS rules for churches and land ownership. Colton J. argued for the grocery store necessity. Staff recommended approval.\n- Item 6B (American Storage PUD/Rezoning): Staff recommended approval. Nicole Watts clarified the landscaping buffer requirements. Staff noted the project aligns with the comprehensive plan and surrounding land uses.\n- Item 6C (Islamic Center):\n - Staff Recommendation: Approved subject to plating.\n - Applicants' Defense: Rick Brown (Architect) and Aslam Sayed (Islamic Society of Tulsa) presented. They confirmed the commercial component is a future retail center. They stated the mosque will be 24,000 square feet initially, with a future retail structure. Peak traffic occurs Friday at 1:00 PM for 20 minutes followed by 5 minutes of dispersal. They confirmed no exterior speakers are planned, citing the existing Irvington location as a precedent. Parking is estimated at 726 spaces, with traffic control provided by hired officers. Funding is currently pledged, with construction starting upon securing 50% of costs. Septic systems will be used as no city sewer is accessible.\n - Commissioner Discussion: \n - Commissioner Payne expressed concern about the economic development potential and the tax revenue from the small retail portion, noting the comprehensive plan supports the Level 6 designation.\n - Commissioner Klempa argued that the comprehensive plan supports the recreation centers and commercial general uses allowed, emphasizing land use consistency over the religious concerns raised.\n - Commissioner Townsend noted the comprehensive plan allows Place of Assembly uses and that the conditional use permit is the appropriate mechanism to address specific concerns.\n - The Commission discussed separating the zoning vote from the conditional use permit vote to allow the City Council to address the noise stipulation.\n - Commissioner Payne moved to approve the zoning (CG) and the CUP with a no-broadcast stipulation.\n\n Key Outcomes\n- Item 6A (Comprehensive Plan Change 25-1716):\n - Vote: Moved/Seconded to approve. Roll Call: Payne (No), Townsend (Yes), Klempa (Yes), Cohen (No), Gorenson (Yes). Result: 3-2 in favor.\n - Outcome: Recommended to City Council for approval on Jan 20, 2026.\n \n- Item 6B (PUD/Rezoning 26-82):\n - Vote: Moved/Seconded to approve. Roll Call: Payne (Yes), Townsend (Yes), Klempa (Yes), Cohen (Yes), Gorenson (Yes). Result: 5-0 in favor.\n - Outcome: Recommended to City Council for approval on Jan 20, 2026.\n\n- Item 6C (Islamic Center):\n - Zoning (BAZ 002469-2025):\n - Motion: Approve rezoning to Commercial General (CG).\n - Vote: Payne (No), Townsend (Yes), Klempa (Yes), Cohen (Yes), Gorenson (Yes). Result: 4-1 in favor.\n - Outcome: Recommended to City Council for approval.\n - Conditional Use Permit (SP 002526-2025):\n - Motion: Approve Conditional Use Permit with notation prohibiting exterior broadcast or announcements (except security/fire alarms).\n - Vote: Payne (No), Townsend (Yes), Klempa (No), Cohen (Yes), Gorenson (Yes). Result: 3-2 in favor.\n - Outcome: Recommended to City Council for approval on Jan 20, 2026, with the noise stipulation noted.\n\n- Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned with 5-0 vote.\n\nDiscrepancy Note: The transcript contains minor name variations (e.g., "Clappa" vs "Klempa", "Gorin's A" vs "Gorenson") which have been standardized in the summary to the correct commission names. The transcript also references a 5-member commission with specific vote counts that are consistent with the roll call."}

The Broken Arrow Municipal Authority met on Tuesday, December 16, 2025, immediately following the City Council meeting at 6:30 p.m. The meeting was called to order, and the consent agenda was approved as presented. No items were removed from the consent agenda, and there were no public hearings, general authority business, or executive sessions. Consent Calendar - Approval of the Broken Arrow Municipal Authority Meeting Minutes of December 2, 2025. - Approval of Budget Amendment Number 16 for Fiscal Year 2026. - Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Aria Filtra, a Division of Trojan Technologies Corp., for annual service of the Aria Filtra Microfiltration System at the Verdigris River Water Treatment Plant. - Notification of City Manager's and Assistant City Manager's execution of Professional Consultant Agreements and Amendments, and public Construction Contracts under $50,000. - Ratification of the Claims List Check Register dated December 8, 2025. Key Outcomes - The consent agenda was approved unanimously via roll call vote (all trustees present voted yes). - The meeting adjourned with no additional discussion or actions.

The City Council convened for its regular meeting on December 16, 2025, to review economic development progress, discuss strategic lessons from a recent best practices trip to Tennessee, and recognize individual achievements. The meeting covered the approval of the consent calendar, public presentations from the Economic Development Corporation (EDC) and the Chamber of Commerce, and remarks regarding recent staff accolades and upcoming seasonal adjournments. Consent Calendar - Approved unanimously. No items were moved for removal from the agenda. Public Comments & Testimony - Mayor Howard: Expressed strong support for the EDC team's networking efforts and visibility, stating they appreciate the team being "everywhere" to build relationships that attract community growth. - Mayor Howard: Raised inquiries regarding the use of Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) in economic development, expressing concern that they might obscure information from the Council during incentive decisions. The sponsor clarified that while NDAs are necessary during early stages to protect company interests (preventing competitor awareness or employee morale issues among existing facilities), the Council always receives full disclosure regarding company identity, job counts, and requested incentives before making any decisions. Mayor Howard expressed relief, confirming the Council requires full information for all assistance decisions. - Council Member Parks: Congratulated James Bell (EDC representative) on being selected for the "Oklahoma Journal's" Power List as one of the "50 Most Influential Oklahomans" for 2025, noting this was a significant achievement for the city. Discussion Items - April-September 2025 EDC Annual Report (James Bell): Presented a high-level overview of the EDC's performance, highlighting: - Capital Investment: Nearly $100 million in active projects for existing businesses, creating over 100 high-quality jobs above the county average. - Pipeline: 13 businesses actively considering Broken Arrow, representing a potential 900 new jobs and $1.3 billion in capital investment. - Workforce: Over 300 job seekers engaged, 10,000+ job board visits, and nearly 3,000 students reached via career awareness events. - Key Projects: ZECO's 200,000 sq ft expansion, CSI Aerospace's relocation to Arrowforge (first tenant), and Project Sapling's multi-phase growth plan positioning the city for 185 future jobs. - Attraction: Progress on "Project Astro" ($1 billion) and Project SAM, emphasizing aerospace and advanced manufacturing strengths. - Advocacy: Hosted a visit with 25+ Oklahoma State representatives to showcase local manufacturers like Arrowhead, Rise Armament, and Zico. - Chamber of Commerce Best Practices Trip Report (Franklin & Murfreesboro, TN): The Chamber presented findings from a trip to near-peer suburban communities, leading to the following observations: - Observations: Success in these communities is driven by long-term thinking (30-year horizons), integration of City Hall as a catalyst for district growth, and seamless connectivity between education, workforce, and economic development. - Strategic Recommendations: The speaker advocated for increased coordination between the City, Broken Arrow Public Schools, Tulsa Tech, TCC, and NSUBA. Key focus areas include formalizing partnerships, expanding digital education tools, and evaluating the mixed-use expansion of the Rose District. - Action Items: Proposed convening industry and education leaders, holding business round tables, and engaging directly with Tennessee counterparts to refine future trips and maximize participation. Key Outcomes - Consent Agenda: Approved unanimously. - NDA Clarification: Council confirmed understanding of NDA protocols, accepting that full corporate and financial details will be provided prior to any incentive approval. - Staff Recognition: Public acknowledgment of James Bell's inclusion on the "50 Most Influential Oklahomans" list for 2025. - Adjournment: The meeting moved into Executive Session at 14:55 following a motion to clear the public, with a 4-0 vote in favor (Green, Ford, Parks, Wimberry all voted Yes). - Future Schedule: Council members noted this was the final meeting before the holiday recess.

The Broken Arrow City Council convened on December 16, 2025, to conduct business regarding the 2026 General Obligation (G.O.) Bond package, specifically addressing public feedback and proposing statutory adjustments to the ballot initiatives. The meeting featured extensive deliberation on a library expansion proposition, presentations from community groups regarding civic needs, and the preview of ordinances concerning hazardous waste cost recovery and noise control at public assemblies. Consent Calendar - The Council approved the Consent Agenda with Item M removed. Item M (specific content not detailed in transcript) was deferred to the next meeting date. - No other items were removed from the Consent Calendar by the members. Public Comments & Testimony - Lily Hilligoss (Girl Scout Troop Organizer): Expressed strong support for the South Broken Arrow Library expansion, noting that the current single meeting room is utilized 97 times annually and that the group relies on the library's no-cost meeting space for fundraising and educational activities. - Dawn Teeve (Homeschooling Parent): Expressed strong support for the new library, citing that her five children have exhausted the current library's limits on book checkouts and are eager for the proposed 3D makerspace to support their projects (e.g., building models). She stated that the current location is "bursting at the seams." - Robert Schaefer (Broken Arrow Girls Softball): Expressed full support for all eight bond propositions, emphasizing the need to give voters the opportunity to fund the library system and strongly supporting Proposition EIGHT for sports facility upgrades to attract outside tournaments. - Brad Gordon (Broken Arrow Adult Softball & Challenger Sports Complex): Expressed full support for the entire bond package, with a specific focus on Proposition EIGHT. He noted that upgraded facilities, particularly the synthetic turf at the Challenger Complex, attract out-of-state athletes (e.g., a National Seniors Association group visiting in 2027 containing 11,000 athletes) and serve as a major economic driver. - Michael Yance (Executive Director, Museum Broken Arrow): Expressed support for Proposition FOUR, detailing a 10-year strategic plan to expand the Museum. He argued that an expanded facility would allow the museum to serve as a center for community events, archives, and storytelling. - Laurie Lewis (Build a Better Broken Arrow Committee): Expressed full support for all eight propositions, highlighting the necessity of quality roads, the library as a civic anchor, and sports tourism as a key economic engine. She emphasized the committee's role in educating the public. - Travis Kelly (Broken Arrow Youth Baseball): Expressed support for Proposition EIGHT, stating that upgrades to dirt fields and parking are essential to make the facility a destination, generate overnight stays, and support local youth employment. - Justin Sharp (President, IAFF Local 2551): Expressed full support for all eight propositions, specifically thanking the Council and City Manager for including Fire Station 9 in Proposition TWO, acknowledging this as a critical addition for a growing city. - Citizens regarding Wreath of Remembrance: Councilor Ford noted that approximately 25% of veterans at Park Grove Cemetery did not receive wreaths for the ceremony due to funding shortages in the Wreaths Across America program, calling for increased community support to cover all 700+ graves. - Councilor Ford: Commended the Christmas parade and Rotary's "Shop with a Cop/Firefighter" initiative, expressing pride in the community's engagement and Christmas spirit. Discussion Items 2026 G.O. Bond Package (Item 9) - Councilor Green: Expressed concern regarding Proposition Seven (Library). While identifying as a supporter of education, he raised citizen concerns about the $4 million allocation given that property taxes already fund library operations and questioned the opportunity cost against other city needs (roads, dog parks, public safety). - Councilor Pickle: Expressed support for the library proposition, citing a personal history where the library improved his academic success. He described the library as a vital resource with a "makerspace" and noted that the library system in Broken Arrow is part of a larger county network, but that the additional $4 million would significantly enhance the South Broken Arrow facility to serve the community's growing needs. - Kim Johnson (Library Director): Clarified that existing property taxes fund operations only, not capital construction. She stated that the library would not proceed with the new South Broken Arrow facility without the $4 million from the bond, noting that while private philanthropy funded Phase 2 of other locations, Broken Arrow requires public funding to match its growth. She highlighted that the South Broken Arrow branch is the fifth busiest (500k+ visitors) and lacks the philanthropic support found in Tulsa. - Public Education: The Council unanimously agreed on the need for an intensive public education phase to address the 133 "neutral" comments and misconceptions (e.g., regarding federal involvement) received during the feedback period. Bond Package Adjustments (Item 9B) - City Manager Spurgeon & Shannon Marshall: Presented recommendations to adjust named versus unnamed projects to comply with state law (requiring 70% named projects). Changes included: - Proposition One (Transportation): Named "Widening County Line Road" (added $150k); added "Aspen Avenue improvements" ($2.5M name/reduced scope on 37th St); reduced "Downtown Drainage" scope. - Proposition Two (Public Safety): Named "Fire Station 9" ($10.2M); renamed "Fire Station One" as an unnamed project (relocation). Added funding for "Indian Springs 2nd Edition" drainage. - Proposition Five (Drainage): Separated "Downtown Drainage" into a $700k named project and $500k unnamed project. - Legislative Timeline: The Council directed staff to prepare ordinances for final adoption at the next meeting (January 6) to allow for voter approval in April 2026. Ordinance 3902 (Hazardous Waste Recovery) - Preview - City Staff: Proposed an ordinance to clarify cost recovery for hazardous waste cleanups, specifically addressing incidents involving pipelines or tanker trucks. The ordinance ensures the city is not liable for costs if the incident is caused by external parties or 811 marking errors. - Councilor Ford: Expressed support for the ordinance, noting that the city should not bear the $750/hour cost of fire truck responses for incidents caused by negligence outside city limits. Ordinance 3901 (Noise Control at Public Assemblies) - Adoption - City Staff: Proposed adopting an ordinance to define noise violations at places of public assembly within 300 feet of residential areas. The standard is defined as noise being "plainly audible" (bass or melody clear to a person of ordinary sensibilities) through closed doors/windows for 10 minutes. - Councilor Pickle: Clarified to staff that the ordinance would apply to existing facilities if they are within the 300-foot zone, not just new construction. Staff confirmed the ordinance applies to current "places of public assembly" already zoned or established within that range. Key Outcomes - Motion to Proceed with G.O. Bond: The Council voted to move forward with the approved 2026 G.O. Bond package (including the adjusted Proposition Seven for the library and Proposition Two for Fire Station 9) to be placed on the April ballot. The final legislation will be reviewed and adopted at the January 6 meeting. - Adoption of Ordinance 3901: The Council adopted Ordinance 3901 (Noise Control) with an emergency clause. - Preview of Ordinance 3902: The Council set Ordinance 3902 (Hazardous Waste) for final adoption at the next meeting. - Action on Item 25-1616: Council approved an ordinance amendment to include banners at Event Park under the existing downtown/banner policy, allowing for 250th Anniversary of the Nation displays. - Councilor Green's Position on Library: The Councilor's initial concern regarding the library funding was addressed by the Library Director, clarifying the distinction between operational taxes and capital bonds; the Councilor subsequently stated he has no further opposition. - Next Steps: Staff will finalize the legal documentation for the bond election and initiate a public education campaign to be completed by January 6. A resolution calling for the election will be drafted for the next meeting.