Public Meetings - Middletown, Connecticut

The Middletown Planning and Zoning Commission convened its regular meeting on Wednesday, October 14, 2026, at 7:00 PM in the City Hall Council Chambers and virtually via WebEx. Acting Chair Thom Pattavina presided. The meeting covered a deferred public hearing, a new special exception, a zoning map amendment, regional planning reports, and updates on litigation. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 6.1 - 672 East Main Street (Two-Family Dwelling): Applicant Gurpreet Oberoi (appearing online during this portion) argued the sign posting lapse was due to late notification from the town and requested a conditional approval. The Chair and Director stated compliance is the applicant's sole responsibility. - Item 6.2 - 388 Main Street (Physical Fitness Facility): Applicant Kiara Narro Vela described the proposed Pilates, Yoga, and Barre studio. - Item 6.4 - 660 & 668 South Main Street (Zoning Map Amendment): Tom Clayton (195 Farm Hill Road) and Ed Geek raised flooding and stormwater concerns related to Long Hill Brook. Geek also asked about wildlife and tree clearing impacts. Discussion Items - Item 6.2 - 388 Main Street: Director Kozikowski confirmed the 552 sq ft use requires a special exception in B-1. Commissioners Nathaniel Spencer and Tyler Eckstrom expressed strong support for the proposal as a health-oriented addition to Main Street. - Item 6.4 - 660 & 668 South Main Street: The commission deliberated on the zone change application by Luke Morrow representing J&J Middletown, LLC. - The applicant argued the B-2 to MXI change would allow multifamily residential units (10–25) on the rear of the 7.4-acre Chevy dealership property while enabling dealership renovation, consistent with the POCD and precedent set by other smaller MXI parcels. - Commissioners extensively questioned floodplain issues, soil conditions, ecological impacts, and traffic. The applicant committed to a comprehensive flood study. - Commissioners Spencer, Eckstrom, and Emily McEvoy expressed general support, noting the zone change itself does not authorize development and all future proposals must return to the commission. - Item 8.1 - Bysiewicz Drive Industrial Building (Deferred): A site plan application for a new 15,000 SF industrial building was postponed by the applicant. - RiverCOG Report: Commissioner Emery reported on regional concerns over protecting industrial land from new housing zoning costs. Commissioner Vinny Szynkowicz agreed, stating the city is ahead of its housing percentage goals. Key Outcomes - Item 6.1 (672 East Main Street): Hearing closed due to public notice deficiency (8 days vs 10). Decision deferred to December 2026. Applicant to work with staff for proper re-noticing. - Item 6.2 (388 Main Street): Motion passed unanimously. Special exception approved for physical fitness facility. - Item 6.4 (660 & 668 South Main Street): Motion passed. Zoning map amendment from B-2 to MXI approved. Future site plans require separate applications. - Minutes: Minutes of September 23, 2026 regular meeting approved. - Appeals: Director Kozikowski reported two appeals received (797 Washington Street and Sand Hill/East Main Street subdivision), with two more expected. He thanked staff for preparing records and noted the financial strain on the land use budget for producing transcripts required for the appeals. Adjournment - The meeting was adjourned.

The Middletown Common Council held a hybrid special community meeting on Thursday, October 8, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. in the Municipal Building Common Council Chamber and remotely via WebEx. The purpose was to give members of the public an opportunity to raise or express issues of concern within the council's jurisdiction. The council heard from five in-person speakers and acknowledged two submitted letters; no remote speakers raised hands. The meeting adjourned after public comment. Call to Order and Procedures - The pledge of allegiance was led, and the Council Clerk read the call of the meeting; the chair declared the call legal and the meeting a legal special meeting. - The chair explained that, at a community meeting, each speaker has 10 minutes (unlike 5 minutes at a regular meeting) and will receive a one-minute warning; speakers were asked to state their name and address for the record. Public Comments & Testimony - Annie Melendez, a New Britain resident and full-time state employee working at One Court Street, spoke about concerns she and people in her office and building have experienced with the traffic and parking pilot program near the courthouse. She said it took her 17 minutes to leave Port Street two days earlier, with the light cycling several times without turning green, and that courthouse business trips were delayed by almost 20 minutes. She raised safety concerns about emergency vehicles, buses, parking on both sides of the street in front of the courthouse, and people congregating outside after the change, including a couple's argument that began in front of the building and continued behind it, which she said could have turned deadly. She asked the council not to include the spaces in front of the courthouse in the pilot program and to restore two-way traffic from there downward so courthouse, transportation, and inmate vehicles can maneuver. - Rogers Pilant, of 80 Round Hill Road, Middletown, publicly commended the Planning and Zoning Commission for its unanimous decision to uphold the Plan of Development and protect the historic downtown by denying a map amendment that would have removed properties' downtown village designation to expand Wesleyan's institutional development zone. Pilant said holding the zoning line does not mean ignoring Wesleyan's need for additional student housing, and suggested restoring historic homes on the block or building smaller multifamily housing that matches the surrounding street. - Paul Manini, of 215 SIS Street, Middletown, discussed Connecticut General Statute 12-81g, which he said requires the city to give a tax break to veterans who are permanently totally disabled and permanently 100% disabled. He said the city has not adopted the optional exemption of up to two acres of land, and that 92 100-percent-disabled veterans in town would be affected. He also said the city can be reimbursed for lost tax revenue under paragraph E, but tax officials told him they have never requested that reimbursement. - Gerald E. Augustine, of 1764 Bartholomew Road, Middletown, a Vietnam War combat infantryman, expressed support for extending the disabled-veteran property tax exemption to unused land and land over two acres. He described his service in War Zone C with the 196th Light Infantry Brigade and the 4th Infantry Division, his return home on August 4, 1967, his PTSD and effects of Agent Orange, the loss of a son to suicide in 2014 at age 38, and his own cancer survivorship. He said he was awarded a tax exemption on his home after negotiations with the tax assessor, but with a stipulation, and asked, 'Why not Middletown? Let's be fair to our disabled veterans.' - Henry Fernandes, of 671 Laurel Grove Road, Middletown, a resident for about 25 years, raised concerns about escalating property taxes, saying he paid close to $14,000 in one year and that neighbors were seeking a forensic audit. He said some homes smaller than his received the same tax increase and residents cannot understand how the figures were calculated. He also said his neighborhood receives few services other than water, a recent street paving would not survive winter plowing, and police presence in the neighborhood only began about six months ago. He questioned the return on tax investment in education, citing Capital Prep's 98% graduation and college-going rate, the statement that children start at 50, an instructor remark that a child was not their priority, and a past Board of Education money-disappearance issue. He noted his water bill rose close to 25% and said he was over 67 and worried about selling a home with $14,000 in taxes when people cannot afford groceries. - Two letters were submitted and acknowledged by the chair: one from John Millardo about health-care insurance costs, and one from Edward Um Dinsey about Wesleyan and taxes. The chair stated that the writers had asked for the letters to be read into the record, but the council announced their names and acknowledged the letters rather than reading them aloud. Key Outcomes - The council took no formal action on the comments and made no referrals during the meeting. - The chair indicated the comments would be noted, and the two submitted letters were acknowledged in the council packet. - With no further speakers, public comment closed; a motion to adjourn was made, seconded, and carried, ending the special meeting.

Note: The user specified the meeting date as October 7, 2026, but the transcript indicates the meeting was called to order on October 1st at 6:31 p.m. This summary uses the user-provided date while noting the discrepancy. The Water Pollution Control Authority (WPCA) convened to address a range of operational, financial, and policy matters. Key agenda items included a public comment on water bill adjustment, approval of prior meeting minutes, financial reports, delinquent accounts, litigation updates, contract payments, a vehicle purchase, creation of a new collection position, and staff operational updates. Public Comments & Testimony - Amy Parlberg (resident, 141 Julia Terrace) requested a recalculation of the sewer portion adjustment on two water bills following a hose malfunction that resulted in bills of $1,300 and $2,500. She argued that because the water did not enter the sewer system, the sewer charges should be prorated. She noted she lacked a prior bill for comparison but has since received a normal bill of $79. The board agreed to re-evaluate the adjustment and indicated they would follow up. Consent Calendar - Minutes of Regular Meeting (August 6, 2026): Approved unanimously after correcting a typographical error ("closed" to "closed"). Discussion Items - Transfer of Funds Update & Monthly Fund Balance Report (August/September): Acting Director Teresa Spiletta reported water cash balance of $3,558,000 (year-over-year increase of $1,347,000) and sewer cash balance of $129,000 after expenditures (year-over-year increase of $1,047,000). A board member requested information on the pension and OPEB liability for the sewer department, acknowledging it affects ratepayers. Ms. Spiletta agreed to obtain details from finance. - Income/Consumption Report: Reported as average for the season; no further action. - Collection Reports: $50,000 collected in July and $57,000 in August. Delinquent reports included commercial/industrial accounts and accounts from the City of Middletown and the Park Department (totaling over $1 million). Chief Engineer Brian Robillard reported progress addressing city water services leaks at the school on Country Club Road and the former Nike facility on Mile Lane, acknowledging past underfunding and deferred maintenance. - Old Business - Metro Square Litigation: No update received from the city attorney's office in over three months. The board requested Acting Director Spiletta seek a written update from the attorney (Briggs office and possibly Nancy) for the next meeting. - New Business - Clean Harbors Contract: The contract for soil removal at 116 West Street originally approved at $185,000 (not to exceed $200,000) incurred additional costs due to higher actual weight of tarry soil, resulting in a total of approximately $224,000. The board previously approved the additional funding in January, but the Finance Department has not released payment. The work is complete, and funds are encumbered. The board expressed frustration and agreed to escalate with the Finance Director. - Vehicle Purchase Resolution: Original bond referendum for a Ford 5550 service utility truck (22-year-old vehicle) was blocked by Finance. A new resolution was presented to transfer funds from FY2024, 2025, and 2026 vehicle replacement lines and combine them with FY2027 funds to purchase the truck without bonding. The board amended the resolution to specify the dollar amounts and vehicle description, then approved it unanimously. - Creation of Billing and Collection Specialist Position: A new position under the collective bargaining unit (Grade 7) proposed to focus on collections and prevent escalation to legal action. Estimated salary $50,000–$70,000, with total cost $100,000 including benefits. The board approved a motion to move the recommendation forward through city processes (HR, GCC, council, union). A request was made for a progress update at the next meeting. - Staff Reports - Department Operational Updates: Ms. Spiletta reported replacement of 40 meters plus radios, three high-usage meters requiring repair or replacement, ongoing underbilling reviews, and that delinquency letters were not sent in August or September due to limited staffing but are planned for October. She noted internal city accounts owe $109,000. Chief Engineer Robillard reported: water complaints were down (only 10 in two months); the filter media RFP for Charles B. Bacon received only one over-budget response; well 5 redevelopment is underway; lead and copper services inspections completed with 120 homes requiring service line replacement (RFP planned for November); two minor water main breaks in September; hydrant painting continues (1,000 painted since 2019); and several pump station and infrastructure projects in design or nearing completion (Mill Street, Russell Street pipe bridges, Abner Roe pump station, Main Street pump station, Johnson Street pump station, Laurel Brook main abandonment). He noted that 14 customers on the old Laurel Brook main may currently receive free water from historic easements; legal review is ongoing. - Mattabasset District Report: A board member reported their appointment to the Mattabasset District board. Highlights included a fish tank displaying clean effluent, an online odor reporting system (only two complaints in past month, both negligible), and encouraged members to review the district's budget and projects. Key Outcomes - Minutes approved unanimously. - Vehicle purchase resolution approved unanimously with amendment to specify funding sources ($60,000 from FY2027 vehicle replacement line) and vehicle type (Ford 5550 service utility truck). - Motion to advance the Billing and Collection Specialist position approved unanimously; staff to provide an update at the next meeting. - Directive to obtain a written update from the city attorney on the Metro Square litigation for the next meeting. - Clean Harbors contract payment to be escalated with the Finance Director. - Public commenter (Amy Parlberg) water bill adjustment to be re-evaluated; department will follow up directly.

Date discrepancy note: The agenda and transcript indicate the meeting was held on Monday, October 5, 2026, at 7:00 PM. However, the summary is instructed to use the date October 6, 2026. This discrepancy is noted. Introductory paragraph: The Common Council conducted a regular meeting that began with a special presentation honoring outgoing Councilman Grady L. Faulkner Jr. for his 20 years of service. The council then approved minutes, held public hearings, passed an appropriation for the LGBTQIA+ Pride parade contract, and approved a series of resolutions including a fiscal agency agreement with Triangle Community Center, a building permit fee cap for the YMCA renovation, naming of open space, lease agreements, and grant distributions. All votes were unanimous except one abstention on the CDBG resolution. Consent Calendar - Appropriation (Item 7A): $13,110 from the General Fund for a five-year contract with Triangle Community Center (TCC) as fiscal agent for the LGBTQIA+ Commission's Pride parade. (Approved 11-0-1, one absent) - Department Reports (Items 8A-8O): Approved en bloc: City Clerk's Certificate, Finance transfer reports for FY25-26 and FY26-27, appropriation reports for both fiscal years, LoCIP (no report), HR Vacancy (no report), and six grant acceptances for Youth Services, Health, and Board of Education totaling over $6.8 million. (Approved by voice vote) - Payment of Bills (Item 10): Approved by voice vote. Public Comments & Testimony - YMCA Building Permit Fee (Item 11I): Multiple speakers (Jay Kaiser, Patty Ann Bassia, Michelle Rolnick, and others) urged the council to waive or cap the building permit fee for the Northern Middlesex YMCA's $22 million renovation project. Speakers noted the YMCA's long service to the community, its programs for youth, seniors, and child care, and the need to close a $1 million funding gap. Councilman Faulkner's motto "Is it good for our community?" was invoked. - Middletown Pride / Triangle Community Center Contract (Item 11J): Nearly 20 speakers voiced strong support for approving a five-year fiscal agency agreement between Middletown Pride and Triangle Community Center (TCC). Speakers included LGBTQIA+ commission members, business owners, residents, and TCC representatives. They emphasized that Middletown Pride is Connecticut's largest Pride event, drives economic impact (e.g., a local business reported 97.54% sales increase on Pride Saturday), attracts residents and visitors, and provides life-saving community programming. Several speakers shared personal stories of feeling unsafe elsewhere and finding acceptance in Middletown. Rachel Simon, TCC executive director, and Amanda Redfern, TCC director of programs, also spoke in favor. - No public comment on other agenda items: The public hearings for the open space naming and lease agreements (Razor to Rosary and Project Big Sky) had no speakers. Discussion Items - Honoring Councilman Grady Faulkner: The mayor read a proclamation declaring October 6, 2026 as "Grady L. Faulkner Jr. Day." State citations from the Connecticut Senate and House, and a certificate from Senator Christopher Murphy were presented. Council members and community leaders (including clergy and former colleagues) delivered tributes highlighting Faulkner's two decades of service, his mentorship of youth, his work on Black History Month resolutions, and his objective, community-first approach. Faulkner was gifted a custom windbreaker and a resolution of appreciation. - Infrastructure and Public Works Update: Mayor Nocera reported that the city has paved over 15 miles of roads this year (goal was 10 miles); City Hall renovations continue (steps, blinds, bathrooms); Green Street School HVAC design is complete; Melilli Plaza bidding is imminent; and the Public Works Director position has 16 applicants (6 qualified) with interviews expected the week of October 19. Councilman Kovach also provided an update on 142 South Main Street: storm water infiltration occurred two weekends prior, the health department issued orders, roof repairs are ongoing and expected to complete in October. Councilwoman Blackwell requested follow-up to ensure landlord accountability. - Route 9 Public Forum: Announced for November 18, 2026, at 6:00 PM. - Mayor's Appointments: Approved three appointments: James Allabus to the Housing Authority (partial term to May 31, 2029); Michelle White to the Fair Rent Commission (three-year term); Aaron Jones to the McDonough School Building Committee (member of the public). All approved unanimously. Key Outcomes - Resolution 11J (Pride Fiscal Agent) – Approved 11-0-1: The council awarded a five-year, $345,091 contract to Triangle Community Center (TCC) as fiscal agent for Middletown Pride, effective immediately. The mayor is authorized to execute the agreement. - Resolution 11I (YMCA Building Permit Fee Cap) – Approved by voice vote (unanimous): The mayor is authorized to cap building permit fees at $100,000 for the YMCA's $13.38 million in construction costs (part of a $22 million renovation/expansion), excluding state education fees. This action supports the YMCA's efforts to close a $1 million funding gap. - Resolution 11A (Open Space Naming) – Approved by voice vote: 19 acres of Boston Road open space (three parcels) named "Robert D. Cyranowicz Open Space." - Resolution 11B (Splash Pad Repairs) – Approved: Authorizes application for a $36,750 LoCIP grant and creates a new capital line item. - Resolution 11C (Opioid Settlement Funds) – Approved: Distributes $175,000 to eight organizations: All-In Recovery ($30,000), Community Health Center Inc. ($30,000), Community Renewal Team ($20,000), Gilead ($19,000), Governor's Prevention Partnership ($20,000), Rushford Center ($25,000), St. Vincent DePaul ($25,000), and The Connection ($6,000), subject to matching fund requirements. - Resolution 11D (Educational Incentive Grant) – Approved: Distributes $30,000 to four organizations: Oddfellows Playhouse ($7,500), Cross Street Training & Academic Center ($7,500), YMCA Kid's Korner ($7,500), and Ekklesia Contemporary Ballet ($7,500), subject to matching fund requirements. - Resolutions 11E, 11F, 11G, 11H (Leases and Map) – Approved: Five-year leases with option for one additional five-year term for Razor to Rosary LLC (900 sq. ft.) and Project Big Sky LLC (6,600 sq. ft.) at Keating Park; map attachment to Memorandum of Agreement; rescission of Resolution 146-2025 to allow new lease consideration. - Resolution 11K (CDBG) – Approved with one abstention (Councilwoman Fulton): Authorizes the mayor to submit a 2026 Annual Action Plan to access $513,605 in CDBG entitlement funding and reprogram prior years' unspent dollars and program income. Note on votes: Unless otherwise stated, votes were unanimous with no recorded opposition.

This special meeting of the Middletown Common Council was held on October 5, 2026 at 5:30 p.m. in hybrid format. The meeting focused on a Questions to Directors workshop, allowing council members to ask department heads and officials about agenda items ahead of the regular council meeting. Technical difficulties with microphones and remote participation were addressed early in the session. Key topics included the Court Street one-way pilot, ethics concerns regarding city officials serving on the YMCA board, the LGBTQ+ Commission’s programming and funding, and the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) allocation. Court Street Pilot Program - Councilwoman Spotola raised concerns from a courthouse employee about emergency vehicle access and traffic congestion on Court Street following the October 1 launch of the one-way pilot. Chief Costa reported that the pilot is in its fourth or fifth day and that feedback is being collected. He acknowledged significant congestion between 4:00 and 5:30 p.m., with backups taking 10–15 minutes to clear. Remedies under consideration include lengthening the green light duration, removing parking spaces near the intersection with Main Street to extend turning lanes, and designating parking spots in front of the courthouse for emergency vehicles only. The pilot is scheduled to run until November 2, after which results will be reported to the council in collaboration with UConn for data analysis. Chief Costa also noted positive feedback from business owners and that snow removal is not expected to pose a problem. - Councilman Lefrito questioned whether the congestion was anticipated, noting that the prior report had identified 4–5 p.m. as peak hours but that the one-way configuration now makes congestion more visible. Chief Costa confirmed that the peak hours were known and that the pilot aims to address them. - Councilwoman Sweeney asked about snow removal coordination with public works; Chief Costa stated that coordination is ongoing and that the issue has not yet been discussed but will be incorporated. Ethics and YMCA Building Fee Waiver - Councilwoman Blackwell asked General Counsel Briggs Smith about potential ethics implications because two city employees (Police Chief Costa and Budget Analyst Rowan Manning) serve on the board of the Middlesex YMCA, which is seeking a building permit fee waiver. Attorney Smith opined that neither employee has the ability to influence official action on the fee waiver in their city roles, and he saw no ethics issue under the city ordinance. He noted that only the Ethics Board can make a final determination. LGBTQ+ Commission Programming and Funding - Councilwoman Spotola questioned Brianna Squevera, chair of the LGBTQI+ Commission, about the commission’s activities and the use of taxpayer money. Squevera clarified that the commission runs nine programs per month (including support groups, social events, and annual events like a community dinner and Stargazing at Wesleyan) in addition to Pride Fest. She stated that no taxpayer money directly funds any program; the city allocates funds to a financial agent (currently the Middlesex Chamber of Commerce) for administrative and fundraising services, which raised approximately $120,000 last year through donations, sponsorships, vendor slots, and merchandise sales. That revenue pays for all programming. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Allocation - Councilman Lafredo asked Director Marks about the CDBG item added to the agenda. Director Marks explained that the application process is public, with a public notice. This year’s allocation is approximately $513,000, similar to previous years. Most awardees are recurring social service organizations (e.g., Gilead, Coon Center, Futures). She confirmed a quorum was present at the August committee meeting and that the number of applications was lower than in prior years (under $600,000 in requests versus $1 million last year). Several items are listed as “program support,” with each organization required to detail how funds will be used. Key Outcomes - No votes were taken during the Questions to Directors workshop; it was purely informational. - Council members received clarification on multiple agenda items, including the Court Street pilot, ethics review, LGBTQ+ funding, and CDBG details. - The meeting was adjourned by motion without further discussion.

Michael Joyce of CDM Smith, along with project team members and city representatives, presented the prioritized safety recommendations for four major corridors in Middletown: Newfield Street (Route 3), Washington Street (Route 66), Route 17/South Main Street, and Saybrook Road. The meeting, part of the Safe Streets and Roads for All program, focused on gathering public feedback on proposed improvements aimed at reducing crashes, improving pedestrian and bicycle safety, and enhancing multimodal connectivity. The presentation covered the analysis methodology, crash data, and a range of potential interventions including roundabouts, lane narrowing, raised crosswalks, signal optimization, and dedicated bike facilities. No formal votes were taken; the meeting served as a community input session. Public Comments & Testimony - Ed McKe (Edmund): Complimented the presentation but found it hard to follow at the pace. Asked if a written description of recommendations for each site would be available; confirmed it will be posted next week. - Susan Making: Raised concerns about the proposed removal of the traffic signal at Park Street and Washington Terrace, stating that the current light provides a safe crossing for pedestrians and prevents road rage. She argued for slower speeds, narrower lanes, and enforcement over signal removal. - Laura (Mount Vernon Street resident): Expressed worry that eliminating the left turn from Washington Terrace onto High Street would trap residents in the neighborhood, as alternative routes are blocked or congested. - Beth Emory: Asked for clarification on the Park Street and Washington Terrace proposal, noting she had previously been told a light would remain. She also advocated for dedicated bike paths on Main Street rather than allowing bikes on sidewalks, and suggested a 20 mph village speed limit. - Unnamed speaker (bicycle safety advocate): Emphasized the need for bicycle safety education programs, citing New York City's free classes and Discover Traffic Gardens. Offered to connect the project team with Fanula Quinn to discuss implementing traffic gardens in Middletown. Discussion Items - Presentation by Michael Joyce: Reviewed the four corridors (12 miles total), crash clusters, and prioritization. Key locations discussed include the Newfield Street gas station area (vertical geometry improvements), Mile Lane intersection (potential roundabout), Liberty Street and Newfield Street (roundabout or continuous green T), Washington Street and High Street (signal removal at Park, left-turn lane additions, raised crosswalks), and Saybrook Road (signal upgrades, intersection improvements at Randolph and Bartholomew). Emphasized that recommendations are not final and will be refined based on public input. - Q&A: Joyce responded to public concerns about traffic signal removal, pedestrian visibility, and connectivity. He explained that the Park Street signal was originally installed for pedestrians despite not meeting warrants, and that a raised crosswalk with rapid flashing beacons could be a safer alternative. He noted that any changes would be part of a corridor-wide strategy to change driver behavior before reaching downtown. Key Outcomes - No formal decisions or votes were made during the meeting. - The draft corridor plan, including existing conditions, future analysis, and prioritized recommendations, will be posted on the project website next week (week of October 8, 2026). - A one-month public comment period will follow the release of the documents. - Feedback from this meeting and the upcoming second meeting (October 3, 2026, for Route 17 and Saybrook Road) will be used to refine concepts and develop a final recommendation package for city council endorsement and potential funding applications.

This meeting was a continuation of the Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) program to improve safety on four Middletown corridors. The October 1 session focused on the southern corridors: South Main Street (Route 17) and Main Street Extension/Saybrook Road. Presenters included project lead Mike, Rima Abisad (CDM Smith), Dan Amstutz and Joe Boscas (VHB), and other team members. Mayor Karvaskowski and representatives from the city, CT DOT, River COG, and transit agencies were in attendance. Public Comments & Testimony - Melissa Shilke (Loveland Street resident): Thanked the team for safety-focused work. Asked whether the intersection of Loveland and High Street (outside the formal corridor) would be addressed, noting student crossings and observed crashes. - Kristen Columbo (Derwin Street resident): Expressed concerns about the proposed realignment of Highland Avenue adjacent to Derwin Street. She feared that a new left-turn pocket from South Main to Highland would block Derwin Street exits and that a roundabout at Randolph would eliminate natural traffic breaks from the existing Big Y traffic light. Requested sidewalks connecting Derwin Street and Pinewood Terrace to the existing crosswalk at Big Y, and safer bicycle access on Highland Avenue. - Brian Barber (Highland Avenue resident): Opposed any changes that would make Highland Avenue more attractive as a cut-through for traffic avoiding the Randolph Road congestion. Specifically opposed allowing left turns from Route 17 southbound onto Highland Avenue; suggested prohibiting that left turn to reduce cut-through traffic and high speeds on Highland. Supported efforts to keep traffic on South Main Street. - Transit representative (likely Brandon from River Valley Transit): Explained that transit uses Highland Avenue to access stops at Big Y and nearby apartments because there is no safe drop-off on South Main. Stated openness to relocating stops to South Main if safe pick-up/drop-off areas are provided as part of the project. - Additional public comment (Loveland Street resident): Expressed appreciation for the proposed sidewalk on the east side of Route 17 near Loveland, noting it would improve connectivity between Main Street Extension and South Main for pedestrians and bicyclists. Discussion Items - Project overview (Mike): Recap of goals to improve safety for all users, especially vulnerable ones (pedestrians, cyclists, wheelchair users). Identified key issues: difficult crossings, poor lighting, missing sidewalks/bike lanes, high speeds, and inadequate lane delineation. The study considered expanded areas beyond the original corridor boundaries based on public input. - South Main Street / Route 17 priority intersections (Dan Amstutz, VHB): - Loveland Street & Route 17: Proposed single-lane roundabout to shorten long crosswalks, reduce crashes (30 crashes, 2 serious injuries), and improve pedestrian safety. Also suggested closing the Mill Street slip lane and leveraging existing right-of-way. A historical rotary existed in 1990. - Highland Avenue: Proposed realignment creating two T-intersections (at Derwin Street and a separate tee) to reduce the high skew and crashes (45 crashes). A left-turn lane from South Main to Highland is being considered. Discussion focused on potential conflicts with Derwin Street traffic and the possibility of prohibiting left turns onto Highland altogether. - Randolph Road: Proposed “peanut” roundabout to address congestion and crashes (42 crashes, many rear-ends) and provide pedestrian/bicycle accommodations. Efforts aim to make it a single-lane roundabout to minimize right-of-way impacts. - Main Street Extension / Saybrook Road priority intersections (Dan Amstutz): - Cooley Avenue & Ridge Road: For Cooley Avenue, a raised intersection and one-way pairing with West Silver Street to slow traffic and improve pedestrian safety (third-highest crashes, 2 pedestrian crashes). For Ridge Road, a roundabout to slow approaching traffic and improve turning movements. Both include bike lanes, street trees, and sidewalks. - Saybrook Road at Randolph Road & Bartholomew Road: Highest crashes on this corridor (12 angle crashes, 1 serious injury). Proposal to separate the two signalized intersections, convert Bartholomew to stop-controlled, add turn lanes, and install sidewalks and crosswalks. - Corridor-wide improvements: Presenters emphasized that bike lanes, buffered shoulders, and streetscaping are standard recommendations for the entire length of both corridors, not just at these priority intersections. - Next steps (Mike): - 30-day public comment period opening the following week; materials (graphics, documentation) will be posted on the project website with 508-compliant formats. Comments can be submitted via email or a project-specific form. - Final report will be reviewed by CT DOT and presented to the project advisory committee, then go to the City Council for endorsement. - After endorsement, the city will pursue implementation funding through programs such as SS4A implementation grants, RAISE grants, or quick-build demonstration projects (e.g., striping improvements). - Discussion about past studies that ended up on shelves; team stated this project includes an explicit implementation strategy to avoid that. Key Outcomes - No formal votes were taken; the meeting was an informational and input session. - A 30-day public comment period will open (exact start date not stated, but “next week”). Community members are encouraged to submit specific location-based feedback to support funding applications. - The project team will refine draft concepts based on comments and complete a final report with implementation recommendations. - The city council will consider endorsing the final safety action plan for the four corridors. - Once endorsed, the city can apply for federal and state implementation grants; quick-build options (e.g., tactical urbanism, restriping) may be pursued sooner. - Materials will be made fully accessible under new federal 508 compliance rules, which may delay their online posting.

The Middletown Planning and Zoning Commission met on Wednesday, September 23, 2026, at 7:00 PM in Council Chambers and via WebEx. The meeting lasted until approximately 11:30 PM after two 15-minute extensions. The commission considered multiple applications including a commercial lease, a two-family dwelling, a Chick-fil-A restaurant and a credit union with drive-thrus, a 29-lot subdivision, and a 76-unit multifamily development with a mobile home park. Several items were continued or voted down due to unresolved concerns about drainage, traffic, and historic preservation. Consent Calendar - Item 8.1 – GS 8-24 Report for Razor to the Rosary, LLC lease at 180 Johnson Street (900 sq ft, 5-year term, hair salon): Approved unanimously by voice vote after brief discussion. The item was moved before the public hearings. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 6.1 – 672 East Main Street Lot B (two-family dwelling): Multiple neighbors expressed concerns about existing flooding on East Main Street and Millbrook Road, questioned drainage plans, and noted that water/sewer department comments from September 22, 2026, still did not recommend approval. Commissioner Ekstrom cited outstanding water/sewer issues as a reason to not support as presented. The public hearing was continued to October 14, 2026. - Items 6.2 & 6.3 – 797 Washington Street (Chick-fil-A) & 809 Washington Street (Dutch Point Credit Union): Public testimony included opposition from nearby residents and historical society representatives who urged preservation of the 1739 Partridge-Southmayd Homestead. Concerns about traffic stacking, cumulative impact with the approved Seven Brew drive-thru, safety of employees in dual-lane drive-thru, and adequacy of the traffic study were raised. Letters of support from the Middlesex Chamber of Commerce and opposition from Ed McEwen were noted. The applicant argued that the historic house would be deconstructed and relocated, and that the project would improve the intersection by closing the Liberty Bank exit and adding a left-turn lane. - Item 6.4 – 29-lot re-subdivision at East Main Street and Sand Hill Road: Extensive public testimony from approximately 20 residents citing dangerous roadway geometry, inadequate stormwater detention (noted in the city engineer’s September 8, 2026, memo), groundwater issues, traffic safety, and potential flooding. The applicant responded that drainage is designed for a 100-year storm and that the plan meets regulations, but acknowledged no groundwater testing was done. Commissioner Cunningham apologized for a procedural error at the September 9 meeting that necessitated a re-vote. - Items 6.5 & 6.6 – 500 Washington Street: 76-unit multifamily & 23-unit mobile home park: A resident testified that left turns out of the site are dangerous and that stormwater flows to Palmer Field. Another mobile home tenant questioned lot sizes and parking. The applicant stated that the project meets all regulations, that stormwater basins are oversized, and that the traffic study projects level of service B at the driveway with average delay of 11 seconds. Discussion Items - Items 6.2 & 6.3 – Chick-fil-A and Credit Union: Commissioners discussed combining the Liberty Bank property (owned by the same applicant) into a unified access plan. The applicant noted that Liberty Bank’s lease ends in 2028 and future use is unknown, so they could not propose that tonight but would accept a condition for future connection. Commissioner Sinkowitz urged incorporating the Liberty Bank site to improve traffic flow. Commissioner Reagan expressed concern about preserving the historic house, noting the POCD emphasizes adaptive reuse. Director Kozikowski reminded the commission that special exception criteria allow off-site impact mitigation but that denial is warranted only if concerns cannot be reasonably mitigated. The motion to approve 6.2 (Chick-fil-A) with conditions (lot line revision and historic building deconstruction) failed 4-3 (needed 5 votes). Motion to approve 6.3 (credit union) with conditions (lot line revision and future driveway submission) passed 7-0. - Item 6.4 – 29-lot subdivision: Commissioner Emory questioned groundwater versus stormwater calculations; the applicant’s engineer confirmed only rainfall was considered. Commissioner McAvoy reiterated a proposed condition for post-construction adjustment of detention basins if unforeseen issues arise. Commissioner Emory said she could not support without the city fixing existing infrastructure. The motion to approve failed 3-4. - Item 6.5 & 6.6 – Multifamily and mobile home park: Commissioner Emory asked about a resident’s mobile home that has not been relocated; the applicant stated they have agreed to pay up to $10,000 but it may cost more. Director Kozikowski noted outstanding conditions including flood venting for garages and drainage easements. Commissioner Regan expressed skepticism about traffic estimates based on personal experience. The motion to approve 6.5 failed (3-4). The motion to approve 6.6 also failed (3-4). Key Outcomes - Item 8.1 (GS 8-24) – Approved unanimously. - Item 6.1 (672 East Main Street two-family) – Public hearing continued to October 14, 2026, to allow water/sewer department review of revised plans submitted September 21, 2026. - Item 6.2 (797 Washington Street, Chick-fil-A) – Motion to approve with conditions (lot line revision, historic building deconstruction) failed 4-3. The application is denied. - Item 6.3 (809 Washington Street, credit union) – Approved 7-0 with conditions (lot line revision and future driveway plan for 827 Washington Street). - Item 6.4 (29-lot re-subdivision, S2026-5) – Motion to approve failed 3-4. Application denied. - Item 6.5 (76-unit multifamily, SE2026-12) – Motion to approve with conditions (flood proofing, drainage easements) failed 3-4. Application denied. - Item 6.6 (23-unit mobile home park, SE2026-13) – Motion to approve with conditions (same as 6.5) failed 3-4. Application denied. - Minutes of September 9, 2026 – Approved. - Next Regular Meeting – November 18, 2026 (rescheduled from November 11 due to Veterans Day).

The Middletown Fair Rent Commission met on Tuesday, September 22, 2026, beginning at 7:07 PM. The meeting included public comment, approval of minutes, withdrawal of one complaint, a lengthy hearing on a retaliation complaint in the Tillman matter, an underlying fair rent hearing for the Tillman tenant, and a full fair rent hearing for the Jacobs tenant. Commission action included a 4–2 finding of retaliation, a rent reduction order, and a separate rent abatement order. Public Comments & Testimony - Mr. McPherson (tenant): Requested an extension on a stipulated order due to a medical issue with his roommate. He indicated he had not communicated with his landlord or attorney beforehand. The commission determined it could not act that evening due to lack of notice and absence of the other party, and advised him to contact the landlord and his counsel. No motion was made. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes (August 12, 2026 Regular Meeting): Approved unanimously after discussion of one commissioner’s vote record. No changes were made. Old Business – Withdrawn Complaint - Sear Matter: Attorney Carlson confirmed that rent certifications were completed, the tenant had reached a balance, and wished to withdraw her complaint (which included no retaliation claims). The tenant confirmed via email. The complaint was withdrawn without objection. Old Business – Tillman Matter (Retaliation & Underlying Hearing) - Background: The tenant, Roberta Tillman, filed a fair rent complaint alleging retaliation and excessive rent. The landlord, Charles Harris, had initiated eviction proceedings based on non-payment after the Middletown Housing Authority (MHA) terminated the HAP contract. - Testimony from Vanessa Delesandro (MHA): She explained that the HAP contract was abated in April 2026 and terminated around June 1, 2026 due to the landlord’s failure to complete repairs. The tenant’s voucher was not terminated; a relocation voucher was issued. The termination notice to the tenant (May 11, 2026) was sent in error – the MHA later decided not to terminate her and offered a voucher. - Landlord’s Position: Mr. Harris testified that the May 11 letter was the only communication from MHA, stating the tenant was responsible for full rent. He initiated eviction when she failed to pay. He claimed he completed all landlord‑responsible repairs but was never informed of the abatement or that MHA reversed the termination. - Tenant’s Testimony: Ms. Tillman described ongoing harassment, lack of heat, hot water issues, and retaliatory actions by the landlord. She stated she paid her portion of rent consistently. - Commission Deliberation: Arguments focused on whether the landlord knew about the abatement and whether the eviction constituted retaliation. Commissioner Fennell moved that the eviction was retaliation because the tenant was not on the hook for full rent during the abatement, regardless of the landlord’s knowledge. Commissioner Calvo opposed. The motion passed 4–2. An amendment to include a cease‑and‑desist order was also adopted 4–2. - Underlying Fair Rent Hearing: After the retaliation finding, the underlying hearing began. Mr. Harris stated he would withdraw the eviction and not renew the lease when it expired in November. The commission then determined the rent was excessive due to uninhabitable conditions. A motion to set rent at $5/month for September through November (deemed prepaid from September) passed. The landlord was ordered to cease eviction efforts. Key Outcomes – Tillman Matter - Retaliation Finding (4–2): Commission found the landlord retaliated by filing an eviction based on non‑payment when the tenant was only responsible for her portion during abatement. A cease‑and‑desist order was issued. - Rent Reduction (4–2): Rent was set at $5/month for September, October, and November. Since the tenant prepaid September, the commission deemed that payment as covering the entire period. No further rent is owed. - Compliance: The written order will be issued by Friday, September 26, 2026. Old Business – Jacobs Matter (Fair Rent Hearing) - Tenant’s Testimony (Jamika Jacobs): Ms. Jacobs, a tenant since April 2016 at 220 Rose Circle, reported mold and moisture problems since July 2025, a broken front door (nailed shut), rodent issues (squirrels for six months), and a disturbing incident with a maintenance worker under the influence. She provided extensive documentation, including videos, photos, work order histories, and medical records for her daughter (asthma). She stated she has not received a new lease due to income changes (worker’s compensation). - Landlord’s Position (Attorney for Carabetta): The landlord maintained that all repairs were completed as per work orders, the health department found no mold issues (report June 16, 2026), the rodent issue was resolved, and the employee involved in the incident was terminated. They offered to conduct an air quality test and an overall inspection. - Commission Deliberation: Commissioners noted the extensive mold evidence, safety concerns, and the tenant’s credible testimony. They found the rent excessive under 14‑78 factors (sanitary conditions, repairs needed) and moved to reduce rent. - Motion: Commissioner Fennell moved to reduce the rent to $100/month from June 2026 (complaint filing date) until the mold is remediated and the front door is replaced. The order also requires the landlord to credit the tenant for overpayments (difference between $373 and $100 for June through September). The motion passed 6–0. Key Outcomes – Jacobs Matter - Rent Reduction (6–0): Rent reduced to $100 per month effective June 2026 until the entire unit is free of mold (including professional remediation) and the front door is replaced. The landlord must provide a full credit for excess rent paid since June. - Compliance Order: The landlord may request a compliance hearing once work is completed. If the tenant’s recertification results in a lower monthly amount than $100, that lower amount will apply. Other Business - Alpha Capital Matter (Curran): Request for continuance due to a death in the family was granted over the landlord’s opposition. Matter continued to next meeting. - Extension for Attorney Mastriani: A 30‑day extension to file an answer on a separate complaint (693 Washington Street) was granted. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 11:30 PM. New commissioners were welcomed.