Public Meetings - Norman, Oklahoma

The meeting was called to order at 4:00 PM on August 6, 2026. The committee received a detailed presentation on visitation, special events, and tourism metrics, followed by a discussion on economic development program strategies, and a discussion on potential residential outdoor lighting regulations. No formal votes were taken, but direction was given on next steps for both the economic development advisory board and a lighting ordinance amendment. Discussion Items Report on Special Events and Visitors - Visitation Data: Jason Olson, Director of Parks and Recreation, and Dan Shim from Visit Norman presented visitation data from the past five and a half months. A chart showed a consistent blue line representing residents and an orange line of out-of-town visitors with spikes corresponding to festivals and football games. A notable low in January 2021 was attributed to a snowstorm. Park usage data: Griffin Park saw over 400,000 visitors in the past 12 months with steady growth. Reeves Park showed a large spike for the Medieval Fair. Westwood Aquatic Center had around 5,000 pass holders last year due to cool June weather, rebounding this year. Young Family Athletic Center hosts weekend tournaments year-round. - Festival Attendance: Medieval Fair 94,000; Norman Music Festival 62,000; Pride Festival at Andrews Park 2,900; Norman Arts Festival 6,500; Jazz in June 6,800; Juneteenth at Reeves Park 3,600. Fourth Fest: 13,000 on July 4 before cancellation due to storm; makeup day 9,200. - Concessions Revenue: The city took over concessions nearly a year ago, generating approximately $400,000 in revenue, with a profit margin around 30%. - Shopping District Visits: University Town Center remains one of the most visited shopping centers in the state. Downtown Norman saw an increase of approximately 400,000 visitors over four years. Campus Corner and other districts showed growth. - Guest Tax Revenue: FY25 ended with a 15% increase; FY26 up another 12%, attributed to SEC impact. Voters recently increased guest tax to 10% effective July 1, 2026. - Hotel Data (from Dan Shim): Occupancy for all Norman hotels (12-month avg) is 41.3%, but without the Postal Training Center (NCD) it rises to 54.2%. Key data hotels (top branded properties) show 58.3% occupancy with Average Daily Rate (ADR) $150 and RevPar $87. A new downtown hotel, The Graduate (Hilton flag), is planned with 120 rooms and a five-story parking garage. - Marketing: Normans new visitor guides distributed to 70,000 locations. A USA Today contest recognizes Norman as one of the best college game-day towns (currently 5th). Digital ads target specific events and markets. - Council Questions: Councilmembers inquired about out-of-town visitor tracking (cell phone data), concessions performance, drivers of downtown growth (e.g., new businesses, Winterfest, Fall Fest), spending data availability, hotel occupancy comparisons with Oklahoma City, leakage to other cities during football season, and the impact of the planned downtown hotel. Discussion Regarding Economic Development Program - Overview: The city manager and staff outlined components of an economic development program: strengthening fiscal capacity, creating quality jobs, and addressing disparities. Current investment includes one employee and a $208,000 budget for community and business relations (retail recruitment, special events). Additional staffing for employer recruitment/expansion could be funded using the $125,000 normally contributed to the Norman Economic Development Coalition (NEDC). - Quality Jobs Definition: Jobs paying $17.50/hour plus benefits are considered quality jobs. - Incentives: The existing Economic Development Incentives Policy (2013) targets specific industries but has no dedicated funding. Past deals like Immuno-Mycologics (Emmy) used TIF funds. There is no retail incentive policy; a recent request from Sooner Mall highlighted the need. - EDAB (Economic Development Advisory Board): Currently seven members, at least four with relevant expertise. Proposed expansion to nine members, with at least five having specialized knowledge and representation from each ward (or eight wards plus at-large). The board would work on policy development. - Other Tools: Center City TIF for infrastructure, parking authority, transportation bonds, transit sales tax, federal affordable housing funds. Consideration of a Cleveland County Economic Development Coalition membership (hybrid model), urban renewal authority, film-friendly city designation, sports tourism tied to 2028 Olympics in OKC, and micro-business incubators. - Council Positions: Multiple councilmembers expressed support for expanding EDAB to nine members with ward representation and not removing current members. Support for requiring quality job thresholds in incentives. Interest in incentivizing redevelopment of vacant buildings (e.g., using county property tax abatement or mini-TIFs). A cap on tax incentives (e.g., 70% city share, 30% immediate benefit) was suggested. The mayor emphasized public infrastructure improvements (like TIF) as a primary incentive and the need for measurable outcomes from any county coalition membership. Councilmember Barry (Ward 6) supported exploring arts and culture, film-friendly policies, and SEC city collaboration. - Next Steps: Staff will bring forward an ordinance to update the EDAB structure (increase to nine members, adjust qualifications). EDAB will be tasked with developing specific economic development policies for council consideration. Discussion Regarding Potential Regulations Related to a Residential Outdoor Lighting Ordinance - Background: City Attorney presented history: attempts in 2006 and 2019 failed. A current complaint at 3500 Grand Canyon Drive involves extremely bright lights (photos shown). A 2011 commercial lighting ordinance exists. - Proposed Approach: Two options: a freestanding code enforcement ordinance (burden on code compliance with four inspectors, nighttime enforcement) or an amendment to the existing disturbing the peace ordinance (Article 24) to include light trespass. The city attorney recommended the latter, using a definition: "light trespass" means artificial lighting extending beyond property boundaries that substantially interferes with reasonable use and enjoyment of neighboring property. Enforcement would be by police via citizen complaints, with mediation encouraged. - Mediation Benefits: Examples cited: barking dog case resolved by neighbor communication; commercial lighting case at a car dealership mediated successfully. This approach avoids criminalizing neighbor disputes and fosters amicable solutions. - Council Positions: Councilmember Kirby provided the photos and noted the lights also affect public safety on roadways. Councilmember Ward (Ward 3) supported the Article 24 approach, emphasizing reasonableness and cut-off lighting. Councilmember Bruce (Ward 4) agreed, noting the lights appeared intentional and egregious. Councilmember Renn (Ward 6) asked about applicability to HOAs, mixed-use PUDs, and public safety; requested language addressing lights that impede driving. Councilmember Stadt (Ward 5) supported public safety language. Multiple councilmembers favored the reasonableness standard to avoid over-enforcement. - Next Steps: City attorney will draft an ordinance amending Article 24 (disturbing the peace) to include light trespass, with potential public safety provisions, and bring it to the full council for consideration.

The Norman City Council held a study session on August 4, 2026, to discuss two major items: a partnership with the University of Oklahoma School of Architecture to build a shelter at Reeves Park using student labor, and a comprehensive fire station study outlining future facilities, relocation, and staffing needs over the next decade. Discussion Items Partnership with OU School of Architecture - Presenter: Brian Bloom, professor in the Construction Science Division, along with Parks Director Jason Olsen. - Program: The American School of Design program (10th year) pairs fifth-year architecture and fourth-year construction science students to design and build real projects for community partners. Student labor is donated 100%; the client provides materials and heavy equipment. - Project Scope: A shelter at Reeves Park, part of the TSEC KidSpace Playground rebuild (funded by a $600,000 T-SET grant). The shelter will match the new playground architecture. The city will provide a $75,000 material budget plus a 10% admin fee. Typical cost for a similar shelter is $250,000–$300,000; this partnership saves an estimated 50–75%. - Timeline: Academic calendar: start in August 2026, design concept by September/October, foundation work by December, finish by April 2027, with an open house in May. - Positions: Councilmembers expressed strong support. Councilmember Dixon noted that he participated in the program decades ago and praised the quality. Councilmember Gansbury highlighted that a previous OU-built structure (MSTAP building on Robinson) served the city well. Councilmember Grant suggested a brass plaque to recognize the students. The project fits within the Reeves Park Master Plan and Norman Forward surplus funds. Fire Station Study - Presenters: Fire Chief King, Deputy Chief Chesser, Assistant Chiefs Smith, Roaning, and Training Chief Mitchell, plus architect Justin Myers from Martinez Architecture. - Context: The last fire station (Station 9) was built in 2013. Since then, call volume has increased 61% (from 13,000 in 2013 to over 21,000 in 2025). The 2025 Matrix public safety study identified a high-priority need for 78 additional suppression personnel. Current stations are understaffed; for example, Ladder 2 runs with a single driver. - Key Projects and Costs (escalated): - Station 5 Relocation: From 168th & Hwy 9 (near city border) to Clear Bay & Hwy 9 (federal land under Dept. of Interior). Voter-approved under PSST2. Estimated cost $12M (excluding apparatus and land). Timeline: potential movement by summer 2027 (FY27-28). - Station 10 (New): Preferred location at Saxon Park (city-owned) on Cedar Lane. Recommended in 2025 study as immediate need due to 60% projected growth east on Hwy 9. Estimated cost $13.5M. No staffing identified. - Station 1 Relocation: Four options considered. Preferred by staff is Santa Fe & Main (requires land acquisition from AT&T and First Baptist Church). Integrated three-story design with admin on third floor. Cost $26M. Alternative: keep current location (415 E Main) and rebuild, or move admin to Station 7 campus (north base area) – that would reduce Station 1 cost but increase campus cost ($12.8M for prevention/training at north base). - Station 11 (New): Recommended at Tecumseh & 24th (preferred) or Franklin & 24th. Cost $13.5M. Serves northeast and would reduce gaps. - Station 12 (Future): At 108th & Franklin area. Cost $11M. Not urgent. - North Base Training Campus: Includes new burn tower, fleet storage, dirty classroom, and prevention/training facility. Cost $12.8M including a potential third story for admin. - Positions and Debate: - Councilmember Still questioned prioritizing Station 1 over Station 11, noting Station 1’s calls often head east (Ward 6) and that $26M for a relocation could instead fund Station 11 plus staffing. - Councilmember Dixon advocated for Stations 11 and 12 over Station 1, emphasizing the 78-personnel shortage and the need for better coverage in northeast. - Councilmember Kirby asked about satellite stations (smaller, cheaper) for rural areas; Chief King said full companies of four are needed for effective response. - Councilmember Bruce and others discussed ISO rating (currently Class 1 citywide, Class 3 in rural areas due to water distribution) and the importance of maintaining it. - Turnpike (OTA) Discussion: Chiefs explained that the proposed turnpike extension lacks adequate interchanges for emergency access. Council consensus (heads nodded) to invite OTA representatives to the August 11 pre-council conference. - Staffing and Funding: City Manager Pyle noted that an eighth-cent sales tax (if transit tax sunsets) could fund about 45 firefighters per year. A go-bond could cover capital costs (buildings, apparatus, land). A combined bond of $150M over 20 years would cost the average homeowner about $14/month. - Next Steps: Chief King will contact the Dept. of Interior about Station 5 land. Staff will bring a similar presentation on police facilities. Council will explore billing third parties for accident responses and possible bond packages. Key Outcomes - Consensus on OTTA Invitation: Council agreed to invite OTA to the August 11 pre-council conference to discuss turnpike interchanges and public safety. - Consensus on Accident Billing: Council directed staff to explore a third-party billing program for fire/EMS responses to accidents, especially those involving out-of-state drivers. - Priority for Fire Station 5: Council emphasized that Station 5 relocation (voter-approved, PSST2) should proceed as quickly as possible, with land discussions beginning immediately. - Police Facilities Presentation: Staff will bring a similar study on police station needs to council in the coming months. - No Formal Votes: As a study session, no resolutions or ordinances were adopted. All decisions are directional.

The City Council of Norman, Oklahoma, held a joint meeting on July 28, 2026, to discuss and act on several agenda items, including a proclamation, a consent docket, zoning for a proposed homeless shelter, and ordinances related to camping on public property. The meeting included public comments on each major item and concluded with miscellaneous citizen remarks. Proclamations - Purple Heart Day (August 7, 2026): Mayor Holman read a proclamation declaring August 7, 2026 as Purple Heart Day in Norman. Commander Joe Gill of American Legion Post 88 accepted the proclamation and spoke about the sacrifices of Purple Heart recipients, urging citizens to welcome home Vietnam veterans. The motion to acknowledge the proclamation passed unanimously. Consent Calendar - Items 2–17: The consent docket, comprising routine approvals and acknowledgments, was approved unanimously. These items were placed on consent by a prior motion and adopted without debate. Public Comments & Testimony - On Item 18 (Shelter SPUD): Multiple speakers expressed positions: - Megan Strong (Ward not specified): Criticized repeated delays and urged approval, stating that leaving people unsheltered leads to encampments and that the same arguments recur. - Heidi Smith (Ward 5, Cleveland County Continuum of Care): Supported the rezoning as the “next right thing,” noting the permanent shelter is the top priority of the community’s home base plan and that the site was the 13th considered. - Evan Taylor (Ward 4, Original Townsite neighborhood): Stated he does not oppose the SPUD but asked for a permanent community-city dialogue, a named contact for the neighborhood, and a commitment to be “neighbors, not just a zoning decision.” He supported approval with ongoing relationship. - Lisa Schmidt (Ward 2, faith community representative): Voiced strong support, saying the shelter is a critical piece for serving vulnerable citizens, and thanked the council for taking the next step. - Alex Landfear (Ward 2): Supported rezoning, citing the ongoing homelessness crisis. - Marguerite Larson (Ward 6): Expressed excitement, stating the shelter is imperative for the community. - Mayumi Windler (Ward 2): Supported approval and provided statistics: 416 unique homeless individuals in 2025 with 28 housed; so far in 2026, 234 unique individuals with 36 housed. Believed a permanent shelter will increase housing connections. - Dan Strawn (Ward 6, Interim Chair of Home Together Norman): Urged approval, framing the SPUD as civic infrastructure that benefits the entire community by addressing homelessness and its impacts on all residents. - James Cromer (Ward 3?): Opposed, stating the land is a “swamp” and that the city makes engineering mistakes. He called for core samples. - Unnamed speaker (floodplain concerns): Raised issues about 2008 FEMA mapping excluding Griffin campus, floodway, chain-link fence in floodplain, and lack of plat. Noted the site plan could be changed without public hearing. - Russell Rice (Ward 2): Noted 33% of land is floodplain but building on non-floodplain area. - Rodney Johnson (Ward 2): Questioned why rezoning must happen now rather than after neighborhood agreements are finalized. Raised concerns about property values and lack of written guarantees for the neighborhood. - On Item 19 (Postponement of Camping Ordinance): Speakers supported postponement: - Russell Rice supported indefinite postponement. - Electron Shaw (Ward 6) supported postponement, citing lack of public awareness and no alternative for unhoused people. - Marguerite Larson supported postponement, saying no substantial alternative existed. - Alex Landfear supported postponement, calling the ordinance antithetical to solving homelessness. - Evan Taylor argued against indefinite postponement, noting the issue will not go away and the ordinance needs work but should have a timeline. - Russell Rice (again) and others spoke to the postponement, generally favoring delay. - Miscellaneous Comments: Several citizens raised concerns about storm debris, a water tower sponsorship (Dr. Pepper), and drainage issues from nearby construction. Lisa Schmidt praised utilities department for fast response to a water meter issue. Discussion Items - Item 18 – SPUD for Norman Housing Hub (Homeless Shelter Zoning): - Assistant City Attorney Anthony Purinton presented the SPUD narrative, emphasizing it addresses only zoning, not operational details. Uses permitted: respite and unhoused overnight sheltering, with ancillary laundry, storage, dog kennel, staff areas, community garden/open space. Design criteria include 1-story buildings, max 40-foot roof pitch, 15-foot setbacks, high-quality exterior materials (masonry, stone, metal panels), one 75 sq ft sign facing away from Reed Avenue, lighting meeting commercial standards, two access points, and landscape screening. The property is triangular, bounded by Bishop Creek (natural barrier), and is currently unzoned state-owned land. Fencing: black vinyl coated on rear, solid stockade on front side. Protests received from 5.6% of area. Architect Sean Lorg (FSB) presented conceptual designs showing building orientation with lower slope toward street to reduce industrial appearance; intake and parking on east side; fire lane; dog run; separate fenced family play area; and community garden area not yet finalized. He noted no civil engineering yet. - Council discussion: - Councilmember Grant asked about children’s play area (confirmed separated family area) and community garden (possible in detention area). Also questioned low-impact development ideas; not in SPUD but possible. Fencing and floodplain concerns addressed. - Councilmember Gandisbury asked about detention pond fencing (confirmed not fenced). - Councilmember Bruce raised concerns about a promised “strategic plan” or “good neighbor agreement” with the neighborhood. Purinton stated discussions are ongoing, a trip to Dallas’ Bridge facility is planned, but no draft exists. Bruce expressed disappointment that no living document has been started. - Councilmember Grant noted that at the retreat, Reed improvement policy was discussed. She also noted that a citizen oversight committee for the shelter’s construction, similar to the animal welfare committee, had been discussed but not yet formalized. - Councilmember Kirby asked about storm shelter and backup generator. Architect confirmed a hardened area in the dormitories; generator not yet designed but advisable. Purinton clarified these are not in the SPUD. - Councilmember Grant pointed out that a neighborhood impact study and infrastructure schedule were recommended by the Planning Commission but are not part of the SPUD; those will require future council action. - Purinton repeatedly stressed that promises made tonight must be in the SPUD narrative; operational promises will come later via operator contract. - Item 19 – Ordinance Prohibiting Camping on Public Property: Councilmember Gandisbury made a motion to postpone indefinitely, citing the Oklahoma Safe Neighborhoods Act (HB 3985) which would take effect in November 2026 and could make the city liable for enforcement actions. She wanted to see how other municipalities handle the law before committing. Councilmember Dixon moved to amend the postponement to a specific date: October 27, 2026 (regular council meeting). The amendment passed, and the motion to postpone to October 27 passed unanimously. - Item 20 – Companion Ordinance (Park Camping Prohibition): Councilmember Gandisbury moved to postpone to October 27, 2026, noting it is a companion to Item 19. City Attorney Knighton explained that if Item 20 were passed without Item 19, it would strike the current prohibition on camping at Sutton Wilderness (since the anti-camping language from the Sutton ordinance was to be moved to the new ordinance), effectively allowing camping there. Therefore postponing together preserves current rules. The motion passed 8–1, with Councilmember Kirby voting against. Key Outcomes - Purple Heart Day Proclamation: Acknowledged unanimously. - Consent Docket (Items 2–17): Approved unanimously. - Item 18 – SPUD for Norman Housing Hub: Motion to adopt on second reading passed 8–1 (Councilmember Kirby voting no). Motion to adopt on final reading passed 8–1 (Kirby no). The SPUD ordinance is approved, zoning the site for shelter use. - Item 19 – Camping on Public Property Ordinance: Postponed to the October 27, 2026 regular council meeting. No further action taken. - Item 20 – Parks Camping Prohibition Ordinance: Postponed to the October 27, 2026 regular council meeting. Motion passed 8–1 (Kirby no). - Next Steps: Council will discuss the camping and parks ordinances in a future study session or committee. The shelter zoning is final; future steps include civil engineering, geotechnical testing, and developing an operator contract and good neighbor agreements.

The Norman City Council held a conference on Tuesday, July 28, 2026, at 5:30 PM to discuss a proposed 10-year contract with Dr. Pepper/7Up to paint and brand the historic Lindsay Street Water Tower as a tourism attraction. The meeting was led by the Mayor, with presentations from the Parks Director and legal staff. Discussion Items - Contract Overview: The Parks Director presented a 10-year, $500,000 contract ($50,000 per year plus a $25,000 upfront payment for painting and a final $25,000 payment). Dr. Pepper/7Up can extend the contract with 100 days' notice. If the agreement ends early, the company will pay up to $25,000 to paint over the logo. The tower is approximately 2,500 feet from the football stadium and will feature the Dr. Pepper logo on two sides. All work must be completed by October 15, 2026, with a kickoff event planned for October 17, 2026 (the first SEC game against Kentucky). - City Responsibilities: The city must maintain the site (structural integrity, electrical, mowing, weed eating, lighting). Lighting is under bid and not required by the contract. The city will replace the existing barbed-wire fence. Any vandalism must be remedied within 15 days, subject to bid limits. The tower will be designated a special use park, allowing unique rules. - Tourism and Marketing: The city and Dr. Pepper/7Up will partner to promote the tower through visitor guides and digital tourism. Dr. Pepper/7Up may install temporary attractions, sample products, and hold up to five special events per year. The tower will be referred to as the "Fansville Water Tower" during the marketing campaign, though Dr. Pepper controls branding. - History and Context: Councilmember Steele noted that the tower, nearly 100 years old and unused for 15 years, had been discussed since a March 2024 council committee meeting regarding demolition or repainting. Previous attempts to partner with OU or local organizations did not gain traction. The idea for a Dr. Pepper partnership arose from Fansville commercials and connections made by Councilmember Dixon. The contract avoids the estimated $500,000 demolition cost and provides a tourism benefit. - Questions and Clarifications: Councilmember Kirby asked about lighting requirements; staff confirmed the contract does not require lighting, and options could be scaled back. Councilmember Cansbury inquired about using the tower in city marketing; staff confirmed the city can use images in digital tourism. The painting bid is based on a two-coat system with a third coat for the logo, and Dr. Pepper will specify exact colors (e.g., a specific shade of red). Key Outcomes - No formal vote was taken during this discussion meeting; the council heard the presentation, asked questions, and expressed support. The meeting adjourned after the discussion. Staff will proceed with coordination and implementation pending final council approval at a future meeting. The next steps include painting the tower, landscaping, lighting installation, and planning the October kickoff event.

The Norman City Council held a special meeting on July 21, 2026, to consider three agenda items: awarding a bid for the Lindsay Tower resurfacing, accepting temporary construction easements for the Summit Hollow drainage improvement project, and convening into executive session for litigation discussion. Discussion Items Item 1: Award of Bid and Contract for Lindsay Tower Resurfacing - Chris, from the Norman Utilities Authority, presented the bid from TMI Coatings LLC for $532,200 for resurfacing the Lindsay water tower with two logos. The bid was originally thought to be lost but was found the next morning, coming in under the engineer's estimate. Staff recommended awarding the bid and adjusting if a third-party logo sponsorship contract materializes. Council discussed paint options: white only ($477,700), City of Norman logos ($512,000), and third-party logos ($532,200). They also discussed paint longevity (10-15 years), structural integrity, and the possibility of cathodic protection. Council expressed support for moving forward with the bid and considering the sponsorship agreement. Item 2: Temporary Construction Easements for Summit Hollow Drainage Improvement - Scott Sturtz, Director of Public Works, explained that four temporary construction easements are needed to permanently repair a collapsed concrete drainage channel that had previously been temporarily fixed with a pipe that floated. The project will install a concrete box structure and restore backyards. All four property owners have signed and notarized the easements. Council noted the effort by Councilmember Gibbonsbury in securing the last easement and expressed support. Item 3: Motion to Adjourn into Executive Session - A motion was made and seconded to adjourn into executive session to discuss possible litigation regarding the acquisition of right-of-way for the Lindsay Street Special Corridor Project from Pickard Avenue to Elm Avenue, as authorized under Oklahoma Statutes Title 25. Key Outcomes - Item 1: Motion to accept bid 2627-04 and approve contract K-2627-10 with TMI Coatings LLC in the amount of $532,200, along with performance, statutory, and maintenance bonds, passed unanimously by voice vote. - Item 2: Motion to accept temporary construction easements E-2627-1 through E-2627-4 for the Summit Hollow drainage improvement project passed 9-0. Staff indicated the project will go out to bid immediately. - Item 3: The council agreed to adjourn into executive session; no vote tally was recorded in the transcript.

The City Council, Norman Utilities Authority, Norman Municipal Authority, Norman Tax Increment Finance Authority, and Norman Parking and Transit Authority met jointly on July 14, 2026, to address several items including proclamations, a rezoning for a homeless shelter, updates to the urban reserve land use minimum, a preliminary plat for a residential development, and a grant application for a sobering center. Council members present were Deck, Grant, Kirby, Steele, Dixon, and Mayor Holman; Blodgett was absent. Consent Calendar - Proclamations: The council unanimously acknowledged receipt of two proclamations: July 2026 as Water's Worth It Month and July 2026 as Disability Pride Month. Representatives from the Environmental Control Advisory Board and the Roughneck Little Cis Spirit Group spoke in support. - Consent Docket (Items 3-27, except 23 and 4): The council voted unanimously to approve the consent docket, which included routine approvals and contracts. Key items discussed before approval included: - Item 20: Service agreement extension with Thunderbird Clubhouse as collaborative applicant for the Cleveland County Continuum of Care. Staff confirmed activities listed are mandated by HUD; councilmember Bruce questioned performance metrics and noted the shift from Housing First to a balanced continuum model. Staff stated the shift is not yet official. - Item 27: Grant application for a street program (sobering center) through SAMHSA (by no match $3 million/year for 4 years). Partners include Red Rock Behavioral Health. Police Chief stated the sobering center would reduce officer time at jail (from 1 hour to 10 minutes) and provide resources. - Item 4 (Shelter Rezoning): Removed from consent and voted separately. Passed on first reading 7-1 (Kirby opposed). The vote initiated the process for a full public hearing in two weeks. Councilmember Kirby expressed concerns about proximity to a school and lack of answers on registered offender checks; staff noted security measures (fenced property, no camping inside). The shelter is planned for the southeast corner of Reed Avenue and Ufala Street. Public Comments & Testimony - On Item 29 (Preliminary Plat for Bellatona): Multiple residents of Ward 5 and Ward 2 expressed concerns about increased stormwater runoff onto adjacent farms, erosion, and lack of enforcement of silt fencing. Marguerite Larson (unclear ward) questioned the cumulative impact of development on green space. Cindy Rogers (Ward 4) emphasized that current regulations control only rate of flow, not volume, leading to flooding. Others noted water quality and habitat protection. - On Item 31 (Urban Reserve Land Use Change): Billy Harless (Ward 5) supported the change back to 10 acres, stating the 30-acre rule unfairly restricted long-time landowners from splitting property for family. Brandon Novar (Ward 5) stated the 30-acre rule was intended to prevent fragmented development and sprawl but harmed rural character and the Thunderbird watershed. Cindy Rogers noted the process prior to AIM had insufficient notification to property owners. - Miscellaneous Comments: Gary King (Ward 5) complained about stormwater runoff and construction dust from a Western Farmers/OEC project, stating plans submitted to council were not followed. Sue Sanders (Ward 4) detailed negative experiences near the current Food and Shelter facility and opposed the new shelter location. Another resident urged stronger franchise negotiations with OGE to bury power lines and improve tree maintenance. Rodney Johnson (Ward 2) urged better enforcement, support for rural businesses, and progress on sales tax incentives. Discussion Items - Item 28 (Parkland Rezoning): Presented by Sean Reger. A rezoning to correct a 2013 mapping error where parkland zoning was not moved when a park was built in Bellatona. The parcel (yellow area) was rezoned from Parkland to R-1. Staff and Parks Director confirmed the existing Bentley Park satisfies parkland dedication requirements. - Item 29 (Preliminary Plat for Bellatona): 104 acres, 403 single-family lots, no variances requested. Drainage analysis showed a minimal increase (0.15 CFS) in runoff to adjacent properties after development. Councilmember Kirby expressed concerns about promised mitigation; city manager and utilities director noted enforcement mechanisms including fines and stop-work orders. Public comments highlighted skepticism about developer follow-through. - Items 31 and 30 (Urban Reserve Minimum Lot Size): Councilmember Steele noted the change from 30 acres back to 10 acres restores the previous standard. Supporters argued it preserves rural character, allows families to split land, and protects the Thunderbird watershed. Councilmember Dixon voted against both items. Passed 7-1. Key Outcomes - Proclamations acknowledged unanimously. - Consent docket approved unanimously (Items 3-27, except 23 and 4). - Item 4 (Shelter rezoning) passed on first reading 7-1; second reading and public hearing scheduled for July 28, 2026. - Item 28 (Parkland rezoning) adopted on second and final reading unanimously. - Item 29 (Preliminary plat) approved 7-1 (Kirby opposed). - Item 31 (Resolution to change urban reserve minimum to 10 acres) adopted 7-1 (Dixon opposed). - Item 30 (Ordinance to amend subdivision code) adopted on second and final reading 7-1 (Dixon opposed). - Staff directed to inspect the Western Farmers/OEC site for compliance with approved plans.

The Norman City Council held a conference on Tuesday, July 14, 2026, to continue discussion on the Lindsay Street water tower. The only agenda item was a status update on bids for painting or demolishing the tower, and a path forward after receiving no bids. The utilities director and staff presented options and council members provided direction. Discussion Items - No Bids Received: The utilities director reported that no bids were received for the previously issued request for painting the Lindsay Street water tower. He explained that potential bidders cited the complexity of eight scenarios, summer workload, and preference for private-sector contracts as reasons for not bidding. - Options Presented: Three paths were discussed: - Rebid with simplified scope: Remove all scenarios and specify a simple two-coat white paint system (no logos or lighting) on the entire structure, including legs. Estimated cost by the engineer: approximately $500,000, with a 10-15 year lifespan (versus a 20-year system that would require full sandblasting and containment, estimated at a higher cost). - Demolition: Estimated at $400,000, with the contractor allowed to keep scrap metal to offset costs. Councilmembers noted that if the city kept the metal, the price would likely be higher. - Preserve for future non-potable reuse: The tower could be kept as a storage tank for irrigation water, potentially serving OU golf course or other areas, but pipe infrastructure costs were prohibitive at this time. - Lighting Projection: Councilmember Grant inquired about adding LED lighting to project colors or logos. The utilities director suggested separating that work into a future bid by a lighting specialist, possibly funded by visitor tax or other non-NUA sources, to keep the paint bid simple. - Gray Water Rate: Councilmember Graham asked about developing a rate for non-potable gray water to incentivize reuse and expand the system long-term. Staff indicated this would require a consultant study and potential future grants from state or federal water resources boards. - State Bidding Contract: Staff planned to explore using the state bidding contract (e.g., BuyBoard) to avoid the 21-day rebid cycle, and would report back to council with pricing. Key Outcomes - The council expressed consensus and directed staff to pursue the two-coat white paint system (outside only) as a protective measure to preserve the asset for potential future use, while keeping the option of demolition alive for cost comparison. - Staff will check state bidding contracts tomorrow morning and bring back current pricing and a recommendation to execute the project or abort. - The lighting projection component will be considered separately in the future, using non-NUA funds if possible. - Consultant services (agenda item 22) will be retained to assist with bid preparation and inspection; item 23 (likely related to the previous bid) was withdrawn. - Councilmember Dixon reiterated support for the two-coat system. No formal vote was taken; direction was given by consensus. - The gray water rate study was noted as a future project, to be explored via an RFP for a consultant.

The Norman Planning Commission met on July 9, 2026, to consider several zoning changes, special use permits, a preliminary plat, and an ordinance to correct sign code language. All votes were unanimous (5-0) on items that were not withdrawn. The meeting lasted approximately two and a half hours and included detailed public testimony from applicants and neighbors. Consent Calendar - Item 1: Approval of the Planning Commission meeting minutes from June 11, 2026, was moved as part of the consent docket. No items were removed. Motion passed 5-0. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 3 (Jeffrey R. C. – Rezoning from PUD to A2): Jeffrey R. C., the applicant, detailed a five-year struggle to develop his property at 3766 East Robinson Street. He described issues with the PUD site plan, denied permits, and safety concerns about proposed driveways. He expressed that the PUD had devalued the property and that he wanted it revoked to sell or start anew. Two audience members spoke in support: Paula Wolf (positive character reference) and Trey Kirby (Ward 5, asked clarifying questions about future use). Greg Orcy (father) asked about alternative paths forward. - Item 9 (Shannon King / Linmark Billboards – Rezoning from C1 to SPUD): Multiple Fiddler’s Green residents spoke against the proposed billboard and manufacturing use. M. Ellen Fever (905 Heather Glenn Terrace) objected to moving a manufacturing company into a residential neighborhood and questioned the billboard’s safety. Jim Jenkins (3328 Heather Glenn Drive) asked for transparency on light, noise, and chemical emissions, specifically requesting a visibility analysis, relocation of the trash compactor, and restrictions on hours. Julie Reyes (928 Heather Glen Drive) opposed the billboard and requested more information on environmental hazards. AC Rains (3320 Heather Glenn) expressed concerns about light pollution from the billboard affecting multiple homes, not just one as the applicant suggested. Richard Squirrel (921 Heather Glenn Terrace) compared the proposed billboard to large structures on I-35 and argued it would be an eyesore and source of light pollution. - Item 10 (Ordinance O-2526-72 – Off-Premises Sign Code Cleanup): AC Rains questioned why the code cleanup appeared after the Linmark billboard discussion, and expressed relief that off-premises signs should be restricted to I-35. Stephen Long (3313 Heather Glenn Terrace) urged the commission to keep digital signs limited to I-35 and not allow them near residential areas. Discussion Items - Item 3 – Rezoning from PUD to A2 at 3766 East Robinson Street: The applicant requested a repeal of the current PUD and reinstatement of A2 zoning, citing years of frustration with the PUD process and inability to expand his powersports business. Staff recommended a repeal of ordinance O-212210 and reinstatement of A2. The commission clarified that the PUD was approved but deviations caused permitting issues. The applicant confirmed he wanted the PUD revoked. Motion to adopt the repeal and reinstatement passed 5-0. - Items 4 & 5 – Special Use for Mini Warehouse and Preliminary Plat at 1 Van Buren Street (Van Buren Self-Storage): Brian McDonald (Barefoot Lanco) presented plans for a climate-controlled self-storage facility (80,002 square feet, 610 units) on 3.5 acres. The facility would be masonry-clad with no drive-up doors, hours 6 a.m. to 10 p.m., staffed 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Commission questioned market demand and pricing. No audience comments. Motion to approve both items passed 5-0. - Item 6 – Rezoning from I-1 to SPUD at 3201 Desk and Drive (Multipurpose Event Center): Shannon King presented a request to rezone to allow an event center in an industrial park, citing that operations occur evenings and weekends when surrounding businesses are closed. She emphasized the community need for safe event spaces. Her husband, John Proctor, added that the building was 5,000 sq ft (1,500 office, 3,500 event area) and that no structural changes were planned. No audience comments. Motion to approve passed 5-0. - Item 7 – Rezoning from R3 to SPUD at 314 East Hayes Street (Salvation Army Dining Facility): Kelly Abel (staff) noted the site is in the Silk Stocking Neighborhood Plan and the Porter O corridor overlay district. The applicant, Shannon King, proposed a new dining facility for the Salvation Army to serve the homeless. One letter of support was received; one protest letter could not be verified. Commissioner Byrd noted that the commercial creep should be limited and that the project respects the overlay boundary. No audience comments. Motion to approve passed 5-0. - Item 8 – Rezoning from RM6, R1, A1 to A2 at 36th Avenue SW near Lindsey Street (Bob Moore Farms): Armando Rosel (landowner’s attorney) explained the rezoning to A2 to allow agricultural use and barbed wire fencing, citing floodplain constraints that prevent development. He noted that livestock (initially cattle) would help manage vegetation. They are still negotiating fence placement along Lindsey Street with the city. No audience comments. Motion to approve passed 5-0. - Item 9 – Rezoning from C1 to SPUD at 801 Canadian Trails Drive (Linmark Billboards Corporate Headquarters): Sean Rieger (applicant’s representative) presented plans to retrofit the vacant former Foodline/AT&T building into a corporate headquarters for Linmark Billboards, including a two-story office addition, light manufacturing (large-format printing), and a 400-square-foot digital billboard (maximum 35 feet tall). He detailed site improvements: removing 43–46% of parking, adding a 55-foot building setback from the adjacent neighborhood, relocating dumpsters, and creating a truck turnaround away from residences. A pre-development meeting with neighbors was positive, but a last-minute protest letter raised concerns about the billboard’s visibility, trash compactor noise, and manufacturing emissions. In response, the applicant offered to restrict compactor use to 8 a.m.–6 p.m., plant mature evergreens on the northwest corner to block billboard light, and limit west-facing windows in the office addition to clerestory windows only. Several neighbors (Fiddler’s Green residents) spoke in opposition, arguing the billboard would be visible from more than one home, the trash compactor should be moved, and the manufacturing process needed full environmental disclosure. Commissioner Byrd and others noted that the PUD locks the site plan, and that the proposed use is less intense than other C1 uses (e.g., hotel, grocery store, marijuana processing). The commission discussed the applicant’s offered compromises. Motion to approve with conditions: (1) west-facing windows on the office addition shall be clerestory only; (2) landscaping (evergreens) shall be planted on the northwest corner to screen the billboard from neighborhood view; (3) trash compactor use shall be restricted to 8 a.m.–6 p.m. Motion passed 5-0. - Item 10 – Ordinance O-2526-72 (Correction of Off-Premises Sign Code): Beth Makala (Assistant City Attorney) explained that the sign code inadvertently retained language from before 2002 that allowed off-premises signs in certain corridors, when the council had actually restricted them to I-35 in 2002. A full repeal and replacement in 2023 codified the incorrect language. The ordinance corrects that error. Audience speakers expressed concern that the timing seemed connected to the Linmark project, but staff clarified the ordinance was a long-planned cleanup. No discussion or opposition on the merits. Motion to approve passed 5-0. - Items 11 & 12 – Withdrawn: Item 11 (rezoning at 36th Avenue NE and Alameda) and Item 12 (preliminary plat for Alameda Trails) were withdrawn by the applicant before the meeting. Key Outcomes - All items that came to a vote passed unanimously (5-0). - Item 3: Rezoned from PUD to A2 via repeal of O-212210 and reinstatement of previous A2 zoning. - Items 4 & 5: Approved special use permit for a mini warehouse (Van Buren Self-Storage) and associated preliminary plat. - Item 6: Rezoned from I-1 to SPUD for a multipurpose event center. - Item 7: Rezoned from R3 to SPUD for a Salvation Army dining facility. - Item 8: Rezoned from RM6, R1, A1 to A2 for agricultural use (Bob Moore Farms). - Item 9: Rezoned from C1 to SPUD with three conditions: clerestory-only west-facing windows, evergreen screening on the northwest corner, and trash compactor hours 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. - Item 10: Approved ordinance correction restoring off-premises sign restrictions to parcels abutting I-35. - Items 11 and 12 were withdrawn by the applicant. - Staff announced an upcoming comprehensive zoning code rewrite with opportunities for Planning Commission input before adoption.

The City Council of Norman, Oklahoma, held a special meeting and ceremony on July 7, 2026, to administer oaths of office to four newly elected council members, elect council leadership positions, and appoint representatives to external boards. The meeting also included council comments addressing recent storm recovery efforts and community engagement. All votes were unanimous. Oaths of Office and Seating of New Council Members - Judge Nichols administered the oaths of office to Councilmember-elect JC Deck (Ward 2), Councilmember-elect Helen Grant (Ward 4), Councilmember-elect Kyle Still (Ward 6), and Councilmember-elect Scott Dixon (Ward 8). All four were sworn in and seated. Elections and Appointments - Mayor Pro Tem: Councilmember Helen Grant was elected Mayor Pro Tem. The Mayor noted that the Mayor Pro Tem is traditionally the most senior council member, and Councilmember Grant is the most senior member besides the Mayor, followed by Councilmember Dixon. - Oklahoma Municipal League (OML) Board of Directors: Mayor Holman was elected as representative, and Councilmember Grant as alternate representative. - Association of Central Oklahoma Governments (ACOG) Board of Directors: Mayor Holman was elected as representative, and Councilmember Dixon as alternate representative. - City of Norman Retirement System Board of Trustees: Councilmember Gannisbury (phonetic) was elected to serve on the board. Council Comments - Councilmembers expressed gratitude to city staff, utility workers (including OGE and EC), and residents for their efforts in storm cleanup following a recent severe weather event. Several members noted that debris pickup guidelines have been updated: limbs up to 8 feet in length and 12 inches in diameter are now accepted. Residents were advised to leave polycarts out if trash had not been picked up. - Councilmember Still (Ward 6) announced two upcoming community meetings: Saturday, July 11, from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. at Beanstock Coffee (867 12th Avenue NE) and that evening from 8 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. at Hollywood Corners. He also encouraged support for Hollywood Corners during its leadership transition. - Councilmember Deck (Ward 2) thanked his family and the community for their support during his campaign. - Councilmember Blood (Ward 4) thanked state and county officials for emergency management assessments and noted that power restoration in Ward 4 was targeted for 10 p.m. that evening. - Councilmember Holman (Ward 1) praised the community's response to the storm and highlighted the Norman High School football team, which helped older residents clear debris on Sunday and Monday. - Mayor Holman welcomed the new members, noted that this was the 42nd and 43rd council members he had served with and that six of the nine current council members were new within the past year. He encouraged residents to check the city's website and social media for storm updates and announced an Art Walk on Friday, July 10, followed by a rescheduled fireworks show at 9:45 p.m. at Reeves Park. Key Outcomes - Four new council members were sworn in: JC Deck (Ward 2), Helen Grant (Ward 4), Kyle Still (Ward 6), and Scott Dixon (Ward 8). - Councilmember Helen Grant was elected Mayor Pro Tem (unanimous). - Mayor Holman was elected as OML representative, Councilmember Grant as alternate (unanimous). - Mayor Holman was elected as ACOG representative, Councilmember Dixon as alternate (unanimous). - Councilmember Gannisbury was elected to the Retirement System Board of Trustees (unanimous). - The next regular council meeting was scheduled for Tuesday, July 14, 2026.