Public Meetings - Oakland, California

The Public Ethics Commission (PEC) of Oakland held its regular meeting on January 21, 2026, chaired by Francis Upton. The meeting covered approval of prior minutes, election of officers, appointment of two new commissioners, a detailed presentation on the Democracy Dollars outreach plan, closure of an enforcement case, and updates on enforcement and administrative activities. Commissioners bade farewell to outgoing members Gage and Steele and welcomed a newly appointed mayor-appointed commissioner, Lawrence Brandon, whose term begins the following day. Public Comments & Testimony - Gene Hazard spoke multiple times. He argued that Enforcement Chief Ackerman erroneously dismissed his complaints (2530, 2533, and 2537) concerning a special election ballot measure and the City Council’s suspension of Rule 29. He stated that the dismissals were without legal merit, that the commission was ignoring clear statutory provisions, and that he is preparing additional writs of mandate. He accused the commission of lacking integrity and called it a “kangaroo court.” - Ralph Kanz raised several issues: (1) that PEC ad hoc subcommittees violate the Brown Act when non-commissioners participate, despite the city attorney’s opinion; (2) that the mayor’s charter reform working group is being conducted in secret with private funding, and his public records request for related documents has gone unanswered; and (3) that a complaint regarding the redistricting commission has been pending for two years without action. He expressed concern over the PEC’s history of delayed public records responses. - During the discussion of the Democracy Dollars outreach plan, Mr. Kanz commented that the program is unfunded and unlikely to launch in 2028, citing Seattle’s experience where administrative overhead consumed 46% of funds and voucher usage remained low. He argued the program is a “sham.” Another speaker (likely Mr. Hazard again) questioned why residents (non‑voters) would receive vouchers and asked about the definition of “democracy” used by the presenters. - During the enforcement report, Mr. Hazard again criticized the dismissal of his complaints and stated that the commission’s failure to act on his appeals disrespects the mayor and the rule of law. Discussion Items - Roll Call and Announcements: All seven commissioners were present. Chair Upton welcomed incoming commissioner Lawrence Brandon and thanked outgoing commissioners Gage and Steele for their service. Commissioner Upton also made a personal statement regarding federal ICE actions and community solidarity. - Approval of Minutes: The minutes from the November 19 and December 10, 2025, meetings were approved. November vote: 5 ayes, 1 abstention (Steele, absent). December vote: 4 ayes, 2 abstentions (Bayeva and Steele, both absent). Reason for abstentions noted. - Election of Officers: Commissioner Talak declined the nomination for chair; Commissioner Upton was re‑elected as chair (unanimous). Commissioner Talak was elected vice chair (unanimous). Terms begin January 22, 2026. - Commissioner Selection: The PEC interviewed four finalists (Luke Apfeld, Angela Fisher, David Liu, Andy McCoy) for two appointed vacancies. Each candidate gave a four‑minute presentation and answered questions. After ranking, the commission voted unanimously to appoint Angela Fisher and Luke Apfeld (terms begin Jan. 22, 2026). The commission also voted unanimously to add David Liu and Andy McCoy to an alternate list for future vacancies. - Local Policy Lab Presentation – Democracy Dollars Outreach Plan: Laura Wood, Anna Corning, and Peter Zond presented a comprehensive draft outreach plan for the Democracy Dollars program, anticipated for 2028. Key recommendations included: centering low‑income residents, communities of color, immigrant/LEP communities, and young voters; using a phased approach (2026–2028) with foundation building, pilot development, and full launch; relying on compensated, community‑based organizations and ambassadors; and establishing an internal city working group. The report provides a menu of outreach tactics ranked by impact and cost. Commissioners praised the report and discussed funding constraints ($350K operations + $700K startup per Measure W), the need for performance metrics, and the importance of cross‑departmental coordination. - Case Closure Plan (Item 7A): Enforcement Chief Ackerman presented case PEC‑19‑12, opened in 2019 regarding 2016 allegations. The respondent died in 2024, and staff recommended closure with no action. The commission unanimously approved closure. - Enforcement Program Report (Item 9): Ackerman reported progress: the staff‑to‑complaint ratio improved from 1:76 to 1:33 (compared to 1:9 in SF/LA, 1:14 in SD). In 2025, more cases were closed than opened. An update was provided on the Dabney fine collection (still outstanding; may go to collections) and the Shaft cases (all individual fines collected; committee‑level fines not pursued). Ackerman noted that the focus on clearing the backlog has delayed new investigations, but she plans to split staff in 2026 to handle both. Form 700 enforcement continues for 2023–2024 filings. In response to questions, Ackerman discussed challenges of managing frivolous complaints and the need for new systems. - Executive Director Report (Item 10): Director Doran highlighted: (1) the promotion of Ethics Analyst Killings to Analyst III; (2) improvements in campaign filing timeliness (90% on time; average lateness dropped from 69 to 32 days) and lobbyist filing timeliness (93% on time); (3) resolution of the prior year’s public records request mediations; (4) an overview of upcoming commission actions and mandatory activities through 2026. Commissioners appreciated the new quarterly activity chart and requested continued inclusion. - Subcommittees and Commissioner Assignments (Item 11): Chair Upton announced plans to form two ad hoc subcommittees in March 2026: one on Transparency (to review past transparency reports, engage IT, consider Sunshine Act improvements) and one on Charter Task Force (to provide input on charter reform, salary setting, and build on prior proposals). A discussion on Brown Act compliance ensued, with City Attorney’s representative Mr. Luby confirming that PEC’s ad hoc subcommittee practices are legal (temporary, advisory, commissioner‑only members). Commissioners expressed interest and discussed timing. Key Outcomes - November and December 2025 minutes approved (5‑1 and 4‑2 votes). - Chair and Vice Chair elected: Francis Upton (Chair) and Jean Talak (Vice Chair) for 2026; terms begin Jan. 22. - New commissioners appointed: Angela Fisher and Luke Apfeld appointed to the PEC (unanimous vote); added to alternate list: David Liu and Andy McCoy. - Enforcement case closed: PEC‑19‑12 closed due to respondent’s death (unanimous). - Democracy Dollars outreach plan received with thanks; the commission will review the report and continue discussions. - Enforcement and director reports accepted as informational; further updates expected at future meetings. - Subcommittees announced: Transparency and Charter Task Force ad hoc subcommittees will be formed in March 2026. Commissioners interested in the charter subcommittee identified. - Legal guidance clarified: Ad hoc subcommittee practices comply with the Brown Act; written records (purpose, minutes, termination) are maintained for transparency.

The Oakland Planning Commission held its regular meeting on January 21, 2026, chaired by Jennifer Rank. The meeting included public comments on a proposed senior housing development, an update from the Planning and Building Director, and a vote on amendments to zoning regulations for housing sites and work-live units. The commission also approved minutes from the previous meeting. Public Comments & Testimony - Allison Hightower (Rockridge resident, 30+ years): Expressed support for redevelopment of the Red Cross site (6230-40 Claremont) and the need for senior housing, but requested a traffic study to evaluate impacts on safety and pedestrian congestion, and suggested the building height be reduced. - Kerry Goff (Auburn Avenue resident, 25 years): Supported additional housing but raised concerns about shadow impacts on existing solar panels on nearby streets (Auburn and Florio), citing state solar rights laws. Also noted that the proposed rents ($10,000–$12,000/month) would be affordable to less than 1% of Oakland seniors, making it "wealthy seniors housing" rather than senior housing. - Javier Arizmendi (architect, AIA Fellow): Supported densification but urged review of fire safety (building height measured at 75 feet, limited setbacks, long 300-foot property line), health impacts (reduced open space to a light well, limiting natural light and ventilation), and welfare (lack of equitable access, excess curb cuts along Claremont). Recommended larger setbacks and community amenities like a vegetable garden or bocce court. - Andrew Del Mato (Rockridge resident): Supported more housing but argued the building should comply with the existing 55-foot height code to maintain neighborhood character and ensure emergency services can handle the density. Highlighted traffic dangers at the Claremont/College/62nd intersection (fatality this summer) and requested the developer fund infrastructure improvements. - Robin Mays (Rockridge resident, realtor, 50 years): Supported appropriate housing but expressed concerns about traffic and parking congestion. Recommended moving the building entrance to the south side to minimize additional traffic on Claremont Avenue, and urged consideration of cumulative impacts from Safeway vendor trucks and service vehicles. - Adam Browning (Rockridge resident): Supported building on the site but requested a Paris-style building (4–5 stories) that respects neighborhood character and includes community assets like a bocce court. Director's Report Director Gilchrist presented an overview of the Planning and Building Department's accomplishments over the past two years and plans for 2026. Key points included: - Streamlined residential development: ministerial review for projects with 1–30 units, adopted objective design standards (ODS) for one- to eight-story projects, elimination of single-family zoning in most neighborhoods (up to four units by right), and reduced discretionary reviews for planned unit developments. - Strategic Planning 2026: Phase 2 of General Plan update (draft land use framework in March 2026), ADU updates in Q2 2026, SB 79 implementation (increased density around BART and bus rapid transit), and short-term rental regulations (background report and stakeholder meetings in early 2026). - Zoning Division: managing ongoing cases; an appeal of a determination on a full-service restaurant (Mimosa 2) coming to Planning Commission in February 2026; and a council appeal (March 26th) of the commission's denial of a major variance for storage on October 5, 2025. - Development Planning: active cases include Claremont Blood Bank (203 senior housing units), 16th Street train station (Wood Street), Brooklyn Basin Parcel N amendment, and several post-entitlement projects under construction (West Oakland BART Mandela Station, LM BART Phase 1, Brooklyn Basin Parcel H, Oak Knoll). - Counter services expanded: walk-in hours Monday–Thursday, virtual appointments Monday–Friday, and addition of four planners. Discussion Items S-14 Housing Sites Zone and Work-Live / Live-Work Amendments Laura Kaminsky, Strategic Planning Manager, presented amendments to: - Clarify the definition of "development project" in the S-14 zone to allow limited expansions of existing businesses (those established on or before January 1, 2026) without triggering a conditional use permit (CUP). Expansions for businesses established after that date, or exceeding 50% or 30,000 square feet (whichever is less), would require a CUP. - Add a CUP process for non-housing developments on S-14 sites, subject to findings of substantial community or economic benefit and no net loss of housing capacity at each income level. Staff confirmed state HCD approval of this approach. - Align work-live and live-work unit regulations with updated building codes (maximum 50% non-residential area per unit). Commissioners raised concerns about the subjectivity of the "substantial community or economic benefit" finding and the potential for cumulative housing loss. Deputy Director Ed Manassi suggested creating administrative guidelines to provide objective criteria, and Director Gilchrist emphasized the need for ongoing monitoring of the housing surplus. Staff noted the housing element requires a mid-cycle review in 2027, and the current surplus (RHNA target 26,000 units plus 10–15% buffer) is adequate. The commission voted to recommend the ordinance to the city council with authorization and direction to adopt administrative guidelines. Consent Calendar - No consent calendar items. Key Outcomes - S-14 and Work-Live/Live-Work Amendments: Motion to recommend adoption to city council passed 5-0 (Commissioners Lee, Robb, Ahrens, Sandoval, Rank all yes) with inclusion of direction to create administrative guidelines for evaluating community/economic benefits. The item will go to City Council's Community and Economic Development Committee on February 24, 2026, and first reading on March 3, 2026. - Approval of Minutes: The minutes from the November 19, 2025, meeting were approved 4-0-1 (Chair Rank abstained).

At its regular meeting on Tuesday, January 20, 2026, the Oakland City Council (8 members present) conducted a public hearing on delinquent business tax liens, extensively debated and ultimately rejected the Police Commission selection panel's reappointment slate, and approved a consent calendar with multiple resolutions. The meeting was called to order at 3:30 p.m. Public Hearing - Business Tax Delinquency Liens: Revenue and Tax Administrator Nicole Welch presented a resolution to place liens on 1,800 properties for unpaid business taxes totaling $5,186,449.10, plus $397,075 in administrative fees, for a total of $5,583,524.10. She noted the number of delinquent parcels had decreased from an initial 2,918 due to ongoing education and collection efforts. Property owners may pay through August 10, 2026. The resolution was adopted unanimously (8-0) after public comment. - Public Speakers on Liens: Several property owners spoke about confusion, mistaken assessments, and financial hardship. One speaker reported 89 businesses closed in November 2025, and another asked for data on why delinquencies increased from 869 in 2023 to over 2,000 in 2025. Staff promised to investigate. Discussion Items - Police Commission Selection Panel Slate (Item 5.1): The Council considered two options: accept or reject the slate of Ricardo Garcia Acosta (full commissioner) and Omar Farmer (alternate commissioner). The selection panel had resubmitted the same slate after an initial rejection in October 2025. Council debate centered on the selection process, the low number of applicants, and whether new applicants (13 received) were interviewed. Public comment overwhelmingly supported the candidates, citing their qualifications and dedication, with several speakers calling the process a distraction. Councilmember Fyfe and Gallo supported the slate; others argued for reopening the process. A substitute motion to reject the slate passed 6-2 (Fyfe and Gallo dissenting). Consent Calendar - Items 6.1-6.12: The consent calendar included minutes, emergency declarations (AIDS, medical cannabis, homelessness), library commission appointments, early care and education grant, mayor's police commission appointments (Judge Griot approved; Doug Wong delayed), Montclair parking contract, Caltrans litter removal agreement, OPD-Santa Clara Police MOU, and several other contracts. - Public Comments on Consent: Multiple speakers from East Oakland Community Project (EOCP) described severe impacts of delayed city funding, including unpaid employee payroll, service disruptions, and client housing losses. The city owed EOCP nearly half a million dollars. Councilmembers pledged to address the issue. - Amendments: The mayor's office requested separating the police commission appointment of Doug Wong due to an incomplete background check; the Council agreed. Councilmember Gallo registered no votes on the Caltrans agreement (6.9) and OPD MOU (6.10), arguing Caltrans should maintain its own properties and that Oakland police are needed locally. - Vote: The consent calendar was approved as amended, 5-2 (Fyfe and Gallo dissenting, Ramachandran excused). Key Outcomes - Police Commission Slate Rejected (6-2): The Council rejected the reappointment of Ricardo Garcia Acosta and Omar Farmer. The selection panel is expected to continue recruitment and consider new applicants. - Business Tax Liens Approved (8-0): The resolution authorizing liens and collection for $5.58 million in delinquent taxes was adopted. - Consent Calendar Approved (5-2-1): All consent items passed except for the noted dissents, with the special request to advance Judge Griot's appointment and defer Doug Wong's. - Next Steps on EOCP Funding: Councilmembers committed to contacting the city administrator to expedite payment to East Oakland Community Project, which reported a $500,000 outstanding bill and risk of shutting down.

The Rules and Legislation Committee met on January 15, 2026, to discuss scheduling of agenda items, review pending lists, and hear public testimony. The committee approved amendments to agenda assignments and rescheduled several items. Key decisions included moving a proposed reorganization of the Department of Transportation's parking division to a future meeting, reassigning an ordinance on prostitution offenses to the Public Safety Committee, and adjusting committee meeting dates. Public Comments & Testimony - Douglas Mount (Assistant to the Director, DOT) spoke on item 3.1, reading a statement about parking systems complexity but time expired before finishing. - Artisha Rose (Parking Enforcement Supervisor) spoke on item 3.1, expressing concern that the proposed reorganization was made without consulting parking enforcement staff and asked that affected employees have a seat at the table. - Keith Sherholtz (DOT employee) spoke on items 3.1 and 3.2, praising Michael Ford's leadership and innovation in parking management, and stating that Ford's leadership has improved morale and revenue. - Kirby Olson (Local 21 Union member and resident) spoke on items 3.1 and 3.2, thanking Councilmembers Brown and Unger for bringing the reorganization to light, calling it a secretive and hostile takeover, and noting opposition from multiple advocacy groups and a petition with 83 signatures from parking division staff. - Kevin Daly (Transport Oakland) spoke on items 3.1 and 3.2, supporting keeping parking within the Department of Transportation as it has been since 2016, and highlighting safety and revenue benefits under Michael Ford's leadership. He also spoke on item 4, requesting that the fire code be placed on the pending list every three years, starting in 2028, and noted copyright issues with the current fire code. - Rajni Mondal (District 4 resident) spoke on item 4, requesting a rules-level discussion to clarify the scope of the Public Safety Planning and Oversight Commission (OPSBAC) under Measure NN, and requesting that application packets for Police Commission appointments be posted for the January 20 council meeting. Discussion Items New Scheduling Items (Item 3) The committee considered multiple agenda items for future committee meetings. Key items included: - 3.1: Informational report on proposed reorganization of DOT's parking division. Administration requested moving from January 27 to February 10 Public Works Committee; committee agreed. - 3.2: Resolution honoring Michael Ford for national parking innovation award. Moved to January 27 Public Works Committee. - 3.3: Ordinance amending prostitution-related offenses. After a title change read by District 2 staff and discussion about committee assignment, the committee moved it to the January 27 Public Safety Committee (instead of Life Enrichment) and added Council President Jenkins as a co-sponsor. - 3.4-3.6: Financial reports moved to February 10 Finance Committee. - 3.7: Grant agreements for community organizations. Moved to February 10 Life Enrichment Committee (per request of Councilmember Ramachandran's office). - 3.8-3.10: Various items assigned to Finance, Public Works, and CED committees on February 10. - 3.11: Resolution awarding grants for nutrition services (title change). Assigned to January 27 Public Works Committee. - 3.12-3.16: Recommendations from previous committee meetings. Items 3.12 (Montclair parking facility agreement) and 3.13 (Caltrans maintenance agreement) were approved and forwarded to January 20 City Council. Item 3.13 was placed on the consent calendar at the mayor's office request, contingent on confirmation from Councilmember Gallo; if not confirmed, it would be pulled. Items 3.14 (MOU with Santa Clara Police) and 3.15 (ITPSA with medical consultants) were approved and sent to consent on January 20. Item 3.16 (summer food service program) was approved and sent to consent. Agenda Review and Pending List Changes (Item 4) The administration proposed several changes to draft agendas and pending lists: - CED pending list item 2 (code enforcement tracking) moved to February 10. - Finance pending list item (citywide strategic plan) moved from February 10 back to January 27. - January 27 Finance committee item 5 (fair labor standards investigation) moved to April 21. - CED draft agenda items 3 (anti-displacement plan) and 4 (relocation agreement) moved to February 10, resulting in cancellation of the January 27 CED meeting. - Public Safety committee meeting on January 27 was moved from 6:00 PM to 1:30 PM to fill the vacancy. Councilmember Fife will be excused, but quorum is present with other members. Key Outcomes - The committee voted 3-0 (with Councilmember Ramachandran excused) to approve the amended new scheduling items (Item 3). - The committee voted 3-0 to approve the agenda and pending list changes (Item 4) as amended. - Notable decisions: The proposed DOT parking division reorganization will be discussed at the February 10 Public Works Committee. The prostitution ordinance will be heard in Public Safety on January 27. The CED meeting on January 27 was canceled, and the Public Safety meeting was rescheduled to 1:30 PM on the same day.

The Public Works and Transportation Committee met on Tuesday, January 13, 2026, at 11:32 a.m. with Chair Unger and Councilmembers Gaio (Agayo), Houston, and Wong present. The committee approved minutes, a pending list, a parking garage management agreement, a Caltrans maintenance agreement, and heard public comments. Consent Calendar - Approval of Draft Minutes (December 9, 2025): Motion to approve passed 4–0. - Determination to Schedule Outstanding Committee Items (Pending List): Motion to approve passed 4–0. - Agreement with Montclair Village Association (MVA) for LaSalle Garage and Scout Lot: Adopted a resolution authorizing a five-year agreement with MVA for operation of the LaSalle Garage (305 spaces) and Scout surface lot (28 spaces) at annual compensation of $295,000 (including $275,000 reimbursable operating expenses and $20,000 management fees), total not to exceed $1,476,000. The resolution waives competitive bidding, SLBE/LBE requirements, and adopts CEQA findings. The committee voted 4–0 to forward to the January 20, 2026 City Council on consent. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 3 (Parking Garage Agreement): Speakers included Daniel Swafford (MVA executive director, supporting), Andrew Jones (Uptown Downtown CBD, supporting), Keith Sherholtz (DOT staff, supporting but urging no changes to DOT structure), Tammy Bird (parking meter collection supervisor, opposing moving parking to Finance), George Spies (Traffic Violence Rapid Response, opposing moving parking to Finance), Kevin Daly (Transport Oakland, supporting the agreement but opposing moving parking), and Blair Beekman (concerns about technology and transparency). Many speakers expressed opposition to a rumored transfer of parking enforcement from OakDOT to the Finance Department, calling for public discussion and data before any changes. - Item 5 (Caltrans Maintenance Agreement): Kevin Daly, Ms. Assata, and Blair Beekman spoke. Ms. Assata strongly opposed the agreement, arguing Oakland lacks staff to address its own illegal dumping and should not take on Caltrans’ responsibilities. Councilmember Gaio expressed similar concerns about accountability of state agencies. Supporters noted the agreement allows the city to clean contiguous city and Caltrans property, making the city look cleaner. - Open Forum: Speakers included Charlton Burks (criticizing overtime and tree permitting delays), Charlotte Niles Bergson (parking technician, urging no move to Finance), Blair Beekman (ALPR vendor and surveillance issues), Kevin Daly (fire code copyright issue), and Derrick Hilger (Vehicle Enforcement supervisor, opposing moving parking to Finance). Discussion Items - Item 3 – MVA Parking Agreement: Staff (Michael Ford, DOT) presented the contract, noting that MVA has managed the garage since the 1970s, successfully piloted gateless parking, and consistently earned customer service incentives. Councilmembers asked about staffing (four part-time employees, two Oakland residents), revenue projections (net gain expected over five years based on demand-responsive pricing), and integration of enforcement. Staff confirmed that parking citations in the garage are issued by city enforcement using ALPR technology. - Item 5 – Caltrans Delegated Maintenance Agreement: Staff (Cesar Macias, Mayor's office; Kristen Hathway, Public Works) explained the agreement funds weed abatement, litter, and debris removal at 29 of 57 selected Caltrans ramp locations. The city will receive $375,000 from Caltrans and use overtime for city staff. Councilmember Houston supported it, noting it prevents incomplete cleanups where city property abuts Caltrans property. Councilmember Gaio voted no, citing insufficient city capacity and a need to hold Caltrans accountable. - Open Forum: Several speakers again raised concerns about a rumored transfer of parking operations to the Finance Department. They cited risks to service, public safety, and collaboration, and requested the council investigate before any change. Key Outcomes - Item 3: Approved and forwarded to January 20, 2026 City Council on consent (4–0). - Item 5: Approved and forwarded to January 20, 2026 City Council on non-consent due to one dissenting vote (3–1, Gaio no). - Item 4 (Measure DD Grant Agreement): Withdrawn and rescheduled to the February 10, 2026 committee agenda. - General: The committee took no formal action on the parking department reorganization mentioned in public comments.

The Life Enrichment Committee of the Oakland City Council met on January 13, 2026 at 4:02 p.m. to consider a consent agenda, the summer food service program grant, and open forum items. The meeting was chaired by Councilmember Fife, with Councilmembers Gallo, Wang, and Houston (excused for part of the meeting) present. Consent Calendar - Item 1 – Approval of Draft Minutes (December 9, 2025): Approved as presented by a vote of 3-0 with Councilmember Houston excused. - Item 2 – Determination Schedule of Outstanding Committee Items (Pending List): Approved as amended. The amendment withdrew item 3 under No Date Specific (FY 2024-25 Cultural Funding Grants) because the Council had already approved a resolution on April 14, 2025. The vote was 3-0 with one abstention (Councilmember Houston). Public Comments & Testimony - Mr. Assada (in person) expressed concerns about the quality of life impacted by Oakland’s sanctuary city status, the governor’s budget reducing housing/homelessness funding by 56%, and federal restrictions on certain words in grant applications. He also raised food safety issues, cultural food preferences, and the need for backup plans for food recalls. - Blair Beekman (online) commented on item 2, declining to speak on it, and later thanked the committee for addressing summer food program issues and encouraged local vendor participation. - Nyle Taylor (in person, Chair of the Sugar Sweetened Beverage Tax Advisory Board) spoke in support of reintroducing city funding for the Oakland Summer Food Program, noting its impact on food education and access in food deserts. - Dr. Jason Lester (in person, acknowledged by Councilmember Houston) expressed concerns about equity and diversifying food providers. Discussion Items - Item 3 – Summer Food Service Program Grant (Resolution): Michael O’Connel from the Human Services Department presented the 2026 summer food program. The city received a $426,870 grant from the California Department of Education and USDA to provide free nutritious meals to children at 49 sites (7 libraries, 19 park/rec centers, 23 community/school sites). The program served over 66,000 lunches in 2025; the target for 2026 is 70,000 meals and snacks. Vendors are Uptons Incorporated (Hayward) and Flo’s Friendly School Lunches (Emeryville). The city is renewing contracts with these vendors without a new RFP, citing compliance continuity and avoiding procurement delays. Councilmembers Gallo and Wong raised concerns about late payments to vendors in prior years. O’Connel stated that internal systems were tightened in 2025 and payments are now timely. The committee also discussed the need to attract more Oakland-based small vendors; O’Connel noted plans for a workshop in 2026 to prepare potential bidders for a future RFP in 2027. The committee voted unanimously (4-0) to approve the staff recommendations and forward the item to the January 20, 2026 City Council consent agenda. Key Outcomes - Item 1 (Minutes): Approved 3-0 (Houston excused). - Item 2 (Pending List): Approved as amended 3-0 with one abstention (Houston). - Item 3 (Summer Food Grant): Approved 4-0 (Gallo, Houston, Wong, Fife) to send to City Council on consent. - Public Comments: Noted during open forum; no formal action. - Next Steps: Staff to work with Councilmember Gallo on a future update from Oakland Unified School District; plan workshop for local vendors interested in the 2027 RFP.

The Public Safety Committee of the Oakland City Council met on Tuesday, January 13, 2026, at 1:34 PM. Chair Wong presided with Councilmembers Brown, Fyfe, and Houston present. The committee approved minutes, set the schedule of outstanding items, and discussed two major resolutions: one authorizing OPD to provide tactical support for Super Bowl 60 and FIFA World Cup events, and another authorizing a software agreement for fire and medical dispatch. All items were approved with 4–0 votes. Public Comments & Testimony - Sada Olabala spoke on multiple items: She requested more detail on public safety grant components (training, cognitive behavior theory) and ceasefire evaluation metrics; raised concerns about background checks for police commission appointees and lack of reporting on officer-involved shootings; questioned OPD staffing risks for out-of-town deployments and the ethics of supporting FIFA after its award to Trump; and noted potential conflicts between OPD general orders and off-duty deployments to Santa Clara. - Blair Beekman advocated for minimal surveillance technology, urged open dialogue on ALPR vendor selection, and cautioned about law enforcement aftereffects of large events. - Rajni Mandal (District 4) raised practical concerns: Skelly hearing backlog (46 cases, 64 officers, 18 hearing officers) and urged clear reporting on discipline stages; questioned OPD's ability to maintain patrol coverage when 25 officers are deployed elsewhere given current staffing of 500 sworn vs. 680 authorized; noted the asymmetry of NSA oversight when OPD assists other jurisdictions; and sought transparency on dispatch technology approvals across departments. - Millie Cleveland (District 4) called for a formal evaluation of the MACRO program (operating three years without evaluation) and requested OPD reports on ICE interactions in Oakland. Discussion Items - Item 1: Approval of Draft Minutes (December 9, 2025) – Approved 4–0 after public comment. - Item 2: Determination of Scheduled Outstanding Committee Items – Accepted as presented 4–0. Chair Wong noted leadership changes (Joe DeVries moved to Animal Services) may delay a previously discussed MACRO special session. - Item 3: MOU with Santa Clara for Super Bowl 60 and FIFA World Cup Support (Resolution) – Staff (Captain Perez Angeles and Deputy Chief Johnson) explained that 25 volunteer, off-duty tactical officers would be deployed on their regular days off, reimbursed by Santa Clara, with no impact on on-duty staffing. Emergency Operations Center would be activated, and Alameda County Sheriff would provide mutual aid if needed. Councilmember Brown introduced an amendment stating deployment shall not reduce on-duty staffing below OPD's established operational baseline. Councilmember Wong proposed a further amendment to also cover any additional needs arising during the period, but it was not adopted after Deputy Chief Johnson confirmed priority would remain on Oakland. The resolution was forwarded to City Council with Brown's amendment (4–0). - Item 4: Software Agreement with Priority Dispatch Corp. for Fire/Medical Dispatch (Resolution) – Staff (Dave Eberle) reported that the new Fire Pro QA module would allow similar triage for fire calls, complementing the existing medical dispatch system. The fire dispatch center recently achieved its sixth ACE accreditation. The resolution authorized up to $150,000 for a three-year agreement, plus $233,030 to pay outstanding invoices from FY2022–2025, and waiver of competitive bidding. Public comment questioned the contract start date (October 2025) with no prior contract, and asked about process consistency across departments. The item was forwarded to City Council (4–0). - Open Forum – Sada Olabala criticized the Rules Committee's rejection of a police commission nominee due to lack of constitutional policing knowledge and disputed claims about commission infighting. Rajni Mandal raised concerns about CIPRA case volumes not meeting NSA Task 2 (85% within 180 days) and urged regular public reporting. Blair Beekman called for better procedural review of ALPR decisions and slowing down rushed agenda items. Councilmember Fyfe expressed concerns about legal compliance in the police commission appointment process. Key Outcomes - Item 1: Approved minutes 4–0. - Item 2: Accepted schedule of outstanding items 4–0. - Item 3: Resolution forwarded to City Council as amended (adding clause: deployment shall not reduce on-duty staffing below OPD's established operational baseline). Vote 4–0. Amendment by Wong (covering any additional needs) not adopted. - Item 4: Resolution forwarded to City Council 4–0. - All items will appear on the January 20, 2026 City Council consent agenda (except Item 1 which was approved directly). - Meeting adjourned after open forum.

The Oakland City Council Rules and Legislation Committee met on Thursday, January 8, 2026, starting at 10:39 AM, with all four members present. The committee considered a series of scheduling items, reviewed draft committee agendas, received a report on the proposed 2026 state and federal legislative agenda, and acted on mayoral appointments to the Oakland Police Commission. Several items required urgency findings and date changes due to impacted calendars. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: The committee unanimously approved the draft minutes from the meetings of December 4, 2025, and December 11, 2025, on a 4-0 vote. Public Comments & Testimony - Blair Beekman (public comment on item 3.2 and 3.5) expressed support for accepting the Police Commission Selection Panel's slate of nominees, noting a more integrated community process in Oakland over the past year. He also commended the citywide strategic plan update and emphasized that declining crime rates are the result of multiple programs working together. - Rajni Mondal (District 4, on item 3.2) urged the committee to focus on process integrity rather than personalities regarding the police commission nominations, stating the same names were resubmitted without a materially different recruitment or vetting process. On item 3.11 (Skelly hearings), she provided facts from an OPD report: 46 discipline cases awaiting Skelly hearings involving 64 officers, with 18 trained hearing officers available, and noted that the backlog has been declining due to process improvements in late 2024. She asked that future reports separate investigation delays from Skelly delays. - Sequoia Hall (Chief of Staff, Roots Community Health, on item 5) thanked the committee for prioritizing youth, specifically the Young People's Wellness Center in East Oakland, which raised $2.3 million for construction. She requested a $5 million investment to fully staff and open the center to serve over 500 youth annually. - Rajni Mondal (on item 6) commended the mayor's selections for the police commission and urged the city attorney to provide a parliamentarian for police commission meetings to restore procedural discipline. - Blair Beekman (on item 6 and open forum) spoke about the need for inclusive community voice in public process, transparency in urgency findings, and a balanced approach to public safety. Discussion Items - Item 3 – Scheduling Items: The committee reviewed 16 scheduling items (3.0 through 3.15). Key actions included: - 3.0: Adopted a resolution for a maintenance agreement with Caltrans (up to $375,000) and granted an urgency finding to expedite consideration. Council President Jenkins added as co-sponsor. - 3.2: Two alternative resolutions regarding the police commission selection panel slate (accept or reject). Moved to January 20 City Council on non-consent. Councilmember Ramachandran noted she would submit questions. - 3.3: Reappointments to the Library Commission advanced under rule 24. - 3.4: Early care and education emergency grant (up to $500,000) advanced due to January 23 application deadline. - 3.5: Citywide strategic plan six-month update rescheduled from January 27 to February 10 Finance and Management Committee. - 3.7: Department of Race and Equity report moved from Finance to Life Enrichment Committee, scheduled for February 24. - 3.8: Title change for Fire Station 4 project (total contract increased from $1.5M to $4.2M). Moved to January 27 Public Works. - 3.11: OPD Skelly hearings report moved to February 24 Public Safety Committee. - 3.12: Newspaper of record report to be presented as an oral report on February 10 Life Enrichment. - 3.15: Salary survey report rescheduled to March 24 Finance and Management Committee. - Item 4 – Review of Draft Agendas & Pending List: The committee adjusted several committee meeting dates. January 13 Community and Economic Development (CED) committee was cancelled; its item 1 (anti-displacement strategic action plan) moved to January 27. January 13 Public Works item 4 (Measure DD grant) moved to February 10. January 13 Public Safety committee meeting was rescheduled from 6:00 PM to 1:30 PM as a special meeting. - Item 5 – 2026 State and Federal Legislative Agenda: Nicolo De Luca, representing the city’s legislative team, presented the 13-page report outlining top priorities: addressing homelessness, illegal dumping/blight, public safety, and economic inclusion. Councilmembers discussed partnering with OUSD on school safety, the state budget timeline (governor’s budget due January 9, May revise, final adoption by June 15), and the role of the Sacramento delegation. The report was received and filed unanimously. - Item 6 – Police Commission Appointments: The committee considered the mayor's appointment of Evalio Griot and Douglas Wong to the Oakland Police Commission. An urgency finding was presented to ensure continuity of operations. Background checks were confirmed to be completed before City Council consideration. Douglas Wong spoke, emphasizing constitutional policing and collaboration. Councilmember Ramachandran asked about his views on council-commission relations; Mr. Wong stressed working with facts and compromise. A technical amendment corrected term dates (October 12 to October 17) and a name (Regina Jackson to Brenda Harbin-Forte). The amended resolution was approved unanimously to go to the January 20 City Council on consent. Key Outcomes - Vote 4-0: Approved minutes of December 4 and 11. - Vote 4-0: Approved all scheduling items as amended (including urgency findings for 3.0, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, and date changes for 3.5, 3.7, 3.11, 3.12, 3.15, and title changes for 3.8, 3.15). - Vote 4-0: Approved item 4 (agenda and pending list revisions) as amended. - Vote 4-0: Received and filed the 2026 legislative agenda report (item 5). - Vote 4-0: Approved urgency finding and resolution confirming police commission appointments (item 6), with technical amendment, to be forwarded to January 20 City Council on consent. - Directive: Mayor's staff to provide corrected legislation to the clerk's office by 4:00 PM on January 8. - Referral: Public Safety Committee meeting on January 13 rescheduled to 1:30 PM; CED committee cancelled.

The Oakland City Council met on Tuesday, January 6, 2026, at 3:34 PM to consider a special municipal election measure for the Police and Fire Retirement System (PFERS), approve a consent calendar including a disputed construction contract, and hear public comment on various issues. The meeting was adjourned in honor of Assistant Chief John Speakman. Key Discussion Item: PFERS Ballot Measure (Item 5.1) - Councilmember Unger presented a resolution to place a charter amendment on the June 2, 2026 special election ballot. The amendment would expand eligibility for the PFERS board (currently limited to PFERS members, many over age 80) to include any retired police/fire personnel, and reduce meeting frequency from monthly to no less than quarterly. The fund is nearly 99% funded with fewer than 600 members; the change is driven by difficulty in obtaining in-person participation from elderly members. The measure has no fiscal impact and is expected to reduce property taxes over time (approximately $750 per million-dollar home already rolled off, with another $750 coming). - Public speakers opposed: Ms. Asada argued that 80-year-olds remain functional and questioned vague eligibility requirements and the cost of placing the measure on the ballot. Mr. Hazard alleged hidden agendas and noted that 90% of police officers live outside Oakland, questioning the need for the change. - Councilmember Houston expressed concern about officer residency but noted the city cannot stipulate residency. Celia Warren (City Attorney's office) confirmed the PFERS board itself requested the changes. - Vote: Motion by Unger, second by Houston. Councilmember Brown excused. Passed 7-0-1 (all present in favor). Consent Calendar (Item 6) The consent calendar included 12 items (6.1–6.12), covering approval of December 16 minutes, declarations of local emergencies (AIDS, cannabis, homelessness), salary ordinance amendments, Campaign Reform Act amendments, the 27th Street Complete Streets construction contract (6.7), a settlement (Twombly v. City), and several commission appointments. Public Comments & Testimony on Consent Calendar - Item 6.7 (27th Street Complete Streets Contract): Extensive debate. Two local contractors competed: Regwick Construction (low bid by $1 million) and McGuire & Hester (second low). Public testimony split: - Supporting Regwick: Bob Rahibi (Regwick president) stated his company is a local Oakland business (14 years), was not responsible for the Hayward gas explosion (subcontractor error), and has mentored local subs. Sam Rahibi noted Regwick is the low bidder by $1 million, saving taxpayer money. Subcontractor Eric Castellan (CEO Construction) said he depends on this contract. Kevin Daly (Transport Oakland) urged passing the project for safety. - Supporting McGuire & Hester: Kevin Hester (employee-owner) highlighted the company's 100-year Oakland history, 100% ESOP ownership, and a mentor-protégé program (successfully grew Jerron Construction from 10 to 50 employees). Isaiah Daniels and Stanley Cooper (Cooper Construction) testified they are local Oakland firms that have worked with McGuire & Hester and would benefit from the contract. Bruce Schoran (NAMCO) urged rewarding good behavior with equity. - Opposing Regwick: Jennifer Benford Seibert argued Regwick’s bid has less diverse subcontractors and lower local economic return; also raised concerns about the Hayward incident (though Regwick was not at fault). - Other items: Ms. Asada raised concerns about tree cutting enforcement, homelessness emergency declarations, cannabis vs. fentanyl priorities, and commission meeting frequency. Mr. Hazard alleged the council’s suspension of Rule 29 (tie-breaking) was unlawful and threatened litigation. Blair Beekman praised the Flock ALPR compromise and urged continued transparency. Derek Barnes (EBRHA) spoke on housing, vacancy, and first-responder affordability. Council Discussion on Item 6.7 - Councilmember Fyfe initially pulled 6.7 due to the Hayward gas explosion investigation; after learning Regwick was not at fault and insurance covers liability, he supported moving forward but echoed equity concerns for minority contractors. Councilmember Houston questioned both contractors’ subcontractors about their workforce and Oakland residency. Director Rowan (DOT) confirmed Regwick was the lowest responsible bidder by $900,000; awarding to McGuire & Hester would require finding additional funding (not available from Measure KK) and likely delay the project a year. He noted both contractors are qualified but the city’s policy is to award to the lowest bid. - Councilmembers Fyfe, Wong, and Houston expressed commitment to reforming the SLBE program to prioritize local and minority contractors, but acknowledged the project’s safety importance (near two senior centers and an elementary school) and the risk of further delay. Councilmember Fyfe moved the consent calendar; second by Unger. - Votes on 6.7: No votes from councilmembers Guyo and Wong. Councilmember Gallo also voted no on 6.7 via electronic participation. Other Consent Items - Item 6.12 (JPA appointment): Councilmember Houston praised appointee David Newton, a lifelong Oaklander. Newton expressed gratitude. - No other items were pulled or discussed in detail. Key Outcomes - Approved: Resolution for PFERS ballot measure (pass 7-0-1). - Approved: Consent calendar as a whole (7-0-1), with no votes on item 6.7 from Guyo, Wong, and Gallo. Item 6.7 (27th Street contract awarded to Regwick Construction) moves forward with a spring 2026 start. - Directives: Councilmembers called for a comprehensive review of the city’s SLBE/LBE contracting program and equity in procurement; Councilmember Wong announced this as a 2026 priority. The city administrator was asked to provide updates from the Department of Workforce and Employment. - Appointments: David Newton to Oakland Alameda County JPA; Rudy Gonzalez and another appointee to the Civil Service Board; and other commission appointments as listed on the consent calendar. - Adjournment: In memory of Assistant Chief John Speakman (firefighter, 42 years, PFERS board member who passed last week). Open Forum Speakers addressed topics including ALPR vendor procurement transparency (Blair Beekman), lead remediation at McClymonds and lack of projects in West Oakland (Ms. Olabala), the legality of suspending Rule 29 (Mr. Hazard), and the unhoused crisis at Wood Street (Mavis Carter-Griffin).