Public Meetings - San Antonio, Texas

The San Antonio Public Safety Committee met on January 20, 2026, to discuss crime statistics, a proposed diversion center for mental health and substance use, and the SA Core crisis response program. The committee approved the consent calendar and voted to fund a feasibility study for a diversion center, referring the matter to the full City Council. Consent Calendar - Minutes Approval: The committee approved the minutes from the previous meeting. - Citizen Advisory Committee Appointments: The committee approved appointments to fill vacancies on various citizen advisory committees. The appointments were originally presented in November, approved by the council in January, and now forwarded to the full council for final approval in February. The vote was taken twice; the first attempt was recalled because Councilor Spears had not yet taken her seat. On the revote, there was one abstention, and the motion passed. Public Comments & Testimony - Susan Jorge (President, Harm Reduction Coalition) expressed strong support for the proposed diversion center, emphasizing that the focus should be on well-being rather than incarceration. She urged that the program include voluntary options and that individuals have the right to choose treatment over jail. She also stressed the need for post-treatment support, such as housing and counselors, to prevent people from returning to the streets. - Jorge Esteves (Local organizer, living with HIV and in recovery from substance use) spoke in support of a compassionate, voluntary approach to mental health and addiction treatment. He cautioned against coercive models ("treatment or jail") which he said are less effective than voluntary care and can increase overdose risks. He advocated for harm reduction services, medication-assisted treatment, and peer support, and urged the committee to work with agencies like Corazon and the Harm Reduction Coalition. Discussion Items - Crime Statistics (January–December 2025 Update): Maria Vargas (Office of Integrated Community Safety) presented an update showing that overall crime in San Antonio decreased by 12.5% compared to 2024, including a 7.7% drop in violent crime. Motor vehicle theft dropped 17% , attributed to public education campaigns, anti-theft devices (especially by Kia and Hyundai), and targeted police enforcement. Drug and narcotic offenses increased by 21.9% ; a council member requested a geographic map of the increases to guide enforcement. The committee discussed the use of Flock license plate recognition cameras; the police chief confirmed they help identify stolen vehicles but noted pursuit policy only allows for violent crimes. The committee agreed to schedule a future discussion specifically on drug and narcotic trends. - Council Consideration Request (CCR) – Diversion and Recovery Center: Councilor Castillo introduced a CCR for a mental health diversion center. Staff from the Center for Health Care Services (CHCS) and the Office of Integrated Community Safety presented the proposal. The center would provide an alternative to incarceration for individuals with mental health conditions, substance use disorders, or intellectual/developmental disabilities. Two models were described: a diversion center (short-term stabilization, up to 14 days) and a recovery center (long-term care, housing, and support). The presentation referenced the Harris County model, which reported saving $5.54 for every $1 spent and diverting 8,835 individuals from jail between 2018 and 2023. Bevar County currently sees an average of 550 inmates monthly with mental health needs, and many are housed in other counties due to overcrowding. The committee recommended funding a feasibility study at a cost of $30,000 from the police department, with an additional $70,000–$90,000 from other sources (total $100,000–$120,000). The study will examine location, required capacity, patient flow, and post-discharge services. Councilor Castillo noted the need for robust aftercare, including case management and housing, and suggested forming an ad hoc committee. Several council members expressed support, emphasizing that the center would improve public safety, reduce recidivism, and lower costs compared to incarceration (jail costs $1,750 per day vs. $550 per day for treatment). - SA Core (San Antonio Crisis Outreach Response) Program: Officer Justin Higgins and Chief of Mental Health Operations presented an update on the SA Core co-responder model, which teams a mental health officer, a paramedic, and a clinician. In 2025, the program received 28,800 mental health-related 911 calls. Of these, 53% were handled by patrol, 34% by SA Core or the mental health unit, and 12% were canceled or duplicated. SA Core has expanded from a 6-month pilot in 2022 (832 responses) to three 24/7 teams in 2025 (over 5,000 responses). Nearly all contacts resulted in linkage to clinical care: 2,757 individuals received follow-up services (24 hours to 90 days later), and 104 received intensive case management or psychiatric care. The committee also discussed a potential mental health triage option at 911 dispatch, using technology to route lower-acuity calls to specialized clinicians, reducing the burden on officers. Councilor Spears requested data on repeat calls and cost projections for further expansion. The committee also addressed mental health resources for older adults, noting that loneliness and isolation are treatable and that Medicare offers access to care. Key Outcomes - Approved: The consent calendar (minutes and advisory committee appointments) was approved after a revote, with one abstention. - Approved (Motion): The committee approved the recommendation to fund a feasibility study for a mental health diversion center, allocating $30,000 from the police department budget. The study will be conducted by the Center for Health Care Services. The committee also agreed to present the CCR in a Session B (full City Council meeting) in February 2026 and to create an ad hoc committee to coordinate with stakeholders, including University Health, the district attorney's office, and community providers. - Next Steps: The SA Core program will provide additional data on repeat calls, geographic distribution, and cost estimates for expanding the team or implementing a mental health dispatch option. The committee will also receive a geographic breakdown of drug-related offenses. A future meeting will focus specifically on drug and narcotic trends.

This meeting of the Public Safety Committee was called to order at 2:06 p.m. and adjourned at 3:59 p.m. on January 20, 2026. The committee considered routine approvals, received crime statistics for 2025, discussed a proposed diversion and recovery center, and received an update on the SA CORE program. Consent Calendar - Minutes Approval: The committee approved minutes from a previous meeting by unanimous voice vote. - Consent Agenda – CAR Appointments: The committee approved appointments to the Citizen Advisory Board for the Police Chief. The motion passed 3 – 1 (with one abstention) after a revote. Public Comments & Testimony - Susan Yerkes (Chair, Bear Area Harm Reduction Coalition) expressed support for the diversion and recovery center, stressing the importance of voluntary, non-coercive treatment and robust follow-up services. - Jorge Esteves (Organizer, Harm Reduction Movement) urged the committee to adopt a harm reduction, non-coercive approach. He shared his personal experience with HIV and substance use recovery and called for peer navigators and real treatment options instead of threats of incarceration. Discussion Items 1. Crime Statistics – January through December 2025 - Overall crime in San Antonio fell 12.5% compared to 2024. Violent crime decreased 7.7%, and property crime decreased 17.5%. Motor vehicle theft dropped 25.6%, attributed to awareness campaigns, enforcement, and anti-theft devices by Kia. Drug/narcotics arrests increased 21.9% (indicating more individuals being caught). Staff will provide a heat map of drug enforcement by district. A future committee meeting will include a deep dive on drugs and narcotics. 2. Council Consideration Request (CCR) – Diversion and Recovery Center - Maria Vargas (Integrated Community Safety Office) and Jelynn Jamison (CEO, Center for Healthcare Services) presented a proposal for a centralized diversion and recovery center modeled after Harris County’s Judge Ed Emmett Center. Key features: pre-arrest/pre-booking diversion, up to 14-day residential stays, on‑site assessments, and linkage to aftercare. Cost analysis shows jail costs $1,750/day vs. $510/day for treatment. Staff recommended a $30,000 contribution from the police department budget for a feasibility study and creation of a joint city‑county ad hoc committee. Council members expressed strong support, emphasizing the need for coordination with the District Attorney’s office, law enforcement, and housing providers. The motion passed. 3. SA CORE Program Update - Chief Mental Health Officer Jesse Higgins reported on fiscal year 2025 outcomes: 5,567 responses, only 1 arrest, 3,156 individuals referred to follow-up, and 804 who received CHCS appointments. The team aims to reduce unnecessary arrests and increase access to care. Discussion focused on adding a mental health option to 911 calls, possibly using centralized clinician triage via StRAC’s Medcom. Council requested tracking of SA CORE availability and comparative data on call responses by patrol vs. specialized teams. An update on older adult mental health was also provided. Key Outcomes - Approved minutes and consent agenda (CAR appointments: 3‑1). - Accepted the crime statistics report; directed staff to provide a drug enforcement heat map and schedule a future deep-dive on drugs/narcotics. - Approved the motion to fund $30,000 for the diversion center feasibility study and to move the CCR to the February 11, 2026 B session for full council briefing. - Received the SA CORE update; staff will produce follow-up data on call response comparisons and SA CORE availability tracking. - Recognized Chief McMahonis for his years of service upon his retirement announcement. The meeting adjourned at 3:59 p.m.

The San Antonio Zoning Commission met on January 20, 2026, at 1:00 PM, chaired by President John Bustamante. The commission reviewed 29 zoning cases, including a consent calendar of 14 items, and held individual hearings on 11 items. Key decisions included approval of several controversial rezoning requests, with public testimony highlighting concerns about traffic, crime, code violations, and compatibility with existing neighborhoods. The commission also postponed five cases to February 17, 2026. Consent Calendar The following items were approved unanimously without discussion: Agenda items 4, 5, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 20, 23, 25, 28, and 29. Item 20 was amended to allow 12 dwelling units instead of 4. Public Comments & Testimony - Luis Morales (opposed Agenda 25 – 1523 N. Alamo St.): Strongly opposed the rezoning, citing increased traffic, crime, and noise from existing businesses, particularly the Bamboo restaurant. - Emily Knaff (San Antonio Museum of Art, supported Agenda 12 – 326 Guenther Ave.): Supported the project as it would complete the museum campus and enhance the urban walkability of the area; raised concerns about tower height and materials. - Christopher Lopez (opposed Agenda 293 – 322 Sheryl Rd.): Expressed concerns about property tax increases and pest control mitigation for the proposed rezoning. - Rose (Hickorify Neighborhood Association, opposed Agenda 318): Requested postponement to allow the representative to present to the neighborhood association, as the proposal was first seen that day. - First Tip (voicemail, opposed Agenda 25 – 1523 N. Alamo St.): Asserted that notification was insufficient because only land owners, not all property owners in condominiums, were notified, and requested a postponement. - Roberto Rabón (opposed Agenda 4 – 343 street): Objected to the rezoning for a bar/tavern, citing trash, dumpster issues, and public urination from the existing business. - Filipe Pereiro (supported Agenda 7 – San Antonio): Supported rezoning for new housing, stating the area suffers from vacant lots, abandoned houses, drug activity, and a recent fire destroyed four homes. - Wills (supported Agenda 11 – Surf Flores): Neighbor spoke in favor, no concerns. - Lucía Oyervides (opposed postponement for Agenda 16 – 5102 Hemhill Dr.): Opposed the rezoning due to lack of sidewalks, poor visibility, parking issues, and fear of Section 8 housing. - Patricia Chadwell (opposed Agenda 1 – 607 Comal St.): Opposed changing from I2 to IDZ3 for a lumberyard, as it could open the door to incompatible heavy industrial uses. - Rebeca Flores Pérez (opposed Agenda 2 and 3 – Easterling and Mount Hood areas): Representing West Improvement / Westover Valley Head Meadows Neighborhood Association, opposed due to decades of code violations, environmental concerns, and lack of trust in the applicant. She provided photos and videos of ongoing dumping and unsafe conditions. - William McDonnell (opposed Agenda 3 – Mount Hood area): Raised safety concerns about heavy equipment crossing Culebra Road, and noted that the property sits on a former landfill requiring gas monitoring, making development risky. - Leticia Sánchez (voicemail, opposed Agenda 26 – 401/417 San Marcos St.): Opposed IDZ2 rezoning, stating the area is all R4 single-family and the applicant did not consult the neighborhood. - Martin Ochoa (supported Agenda 26 – San Marcos St.): Supported the project as a place for military families to gather during graduation, noting the lack of family-friendly accommodations near Lackland and the Alamo. Discussion Items - Agenda 1 (607 Comal St.): Request to change from I2 (heavy industrial) to IDZ3 for a construction materials yard. Staff recommended approval. The applicant stated the lot is too small (55×75 ft) for I2 setbacks. A nearby resident who initially opposed changed position after speaking with the applicant. The commission approved the request (10–0). - Agenda 2 (5682 Easterling Dr.): Request to change from R6 to C2NA (commercial, no alcohol) for a cement plant site. The applicant (River City ReadyMix) plans to clean the site and sell it. The neighborhood association opposed, citing past code violations and broken promises. Staff recommended approval. The commission voted 10–1 to approve, with Commissioner Dugo dissenting, arguing commercial use in a residential donut was inappropriate. - Agenda 3 (5682 Easterling Dr. – adjacent lot): Request to change from R6 to C1 (light commercial) as an alternative to C2. The applicant reduced the request from C2 to C1 after discussions. The neighborhood association remained opposed. Staff recommended approval. The commission approved 10–1, with Commissioner Saipes dissenting, noting the C1 uses would create an island incompatible with surrounding residential. - Agenda 4 (343 Street – bar/tavern): Request to change from R4 to IDZ1 for a bar/tavern with live entertainment. The Lone Star Neighborhood Association was in favor. The commission approved unanimously. - Agenda 6 (201 Cortland Pl.): Request to change from RN4 to IDZ2 for a five-unit residential development. Staff recommended denial, citing incompatibility with the residential block. The applicant, Andre Weaver, argued the property is surrounded by MF33 uses and the request would allow a safe, consistent development. The commission overruled staff and approved 9–1 (Commissioner Dugo dissented). - Agenda 8 (4131 Culebra Rd.): Postponed to February 13, 2026, after the applicant clarified the request was to maintain C2 with a revised use. - Agenda 10 (12698/722 Menefee Blvd.): Request to change from R6 to R6 CD for a two-unit accessory dwelling. The owner had built an ADU without proper permits. Staff recommended approval with conditions. The commission approved 9–1 (Commissioner Dugo dissented), noting the owner had made efforts to comply. - Agenda 18 (13526 Nacogdoches Rd.): Request to change from C2 to C2 CD for a construction contractor business. Staff recommended approval with a 15-foot landscape buffer. The applicant argued the buffer would eliminate 50 parking spaces and was unnecessary given 40 years of existing use. The commission approved without the buffer but with a condition for downward-facing lighting, over the objection of the applicant’s representative. Vote: 10–0. - Agenda 21 (446 Mia Dr.): Request to change from R6 to MLOD-2 for a two-unit rental property. The owner explained the property was originally built for his parents. Staff recommended approval. The commission approved 9–1 (Commissioner Dugo dissented). - Agenda 24 (2601 Guadalupe St.): Request to change from R4 to C2PNA (with conditional use for vehicle repair). The applicant amended from C2 to C2NA. The neighborhood association supported the change. The commission approved unanimously. - Agenda 26 (401/417 San Marcos St.): Request to change from R4 to IDZ2 for an eight-bedroom bed-and-breakfast for military families. Staff recommended denial, citing incompatibility with the industrial surroundings and density. The applicant argued the property is a peninsula between industrial and commercial uses, and the project would revitalize the area. The commission approved 10–0, praising the innovative concept. Key Outcomes - Approved on consent calendar: Items 4, 5, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 20 (as amended to 12 units), 23, 25, 28, 29. - Approved after individual hearings: Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 18, 21, 24, 26. - Postponed: Item 8 to February 13, 2026; Items 9, 16, 17, 22, 27 to February 17, 2026. - Vote tallies: - Item 1: 10–0 - Item 2: 10–1 (Dugo dissenting) - Item 3: 10–1 (Saipes dissenting) - Item 4: Unanimous - Item 6: 9–1 (Dugo dissenting) - Item 10: 9–1 (Dugo dissenting) - Item 18: 10–0 - Item 21: 9–1 (Dugo dissenting) - Item 24: Unanimous - Item 26: 10–0 - Minutes approved: The minutes of the December 6, 2025 meeting were approved unanimously. - Next steps: All approved cases will be forwarded to the City Council for final decision. Postponed cases will be heard at the February 13 or 17, 2026 commission meetings.

The Transportation and Infrastructure Committee met on January 20, 2026, at 10:07 AM to receive two briefings: an overview of city-owned facility maintenance processes and a briefing on surplus properties. The meeting adjourned at 10:55 AM. No public comments were made. The committee approved the minutes from the December 2, 2025 meeting. Consent Calendar - Approval of minutes from the December 2, 2025 meeting (motion passed unanimously). Public Comments & Testimony - None. Discussion Items - Facility Maintenance Overview: Mike Shannon, Director of Capital Delivery, presented on the city's nearly 500 facilities, the deferred maintenance program ($30 million over six years), bond programs (2017 and 2022 totaling $58 million and $136 million respectively), and the capital improvement program ($2.34 billion excluding streets and drainage). Chair McKee Rodriguez expressed concern about the lack of a comprehensive condition assessment and requested a detailed list of all facilities, including age, last renovation date, condition, and use data. Councilmember Mungia asked about the status of the Polartec aquatic center and multi-gen center (still under construction) and Fire Station 10 property acquisition (ongoing, no property secured yet). Councilmember Gabito requested a list of vacant facilities and a map of their locations. Councilmember Spears asked for condition ratings, projected funding gaps, and criteria for moving projects from deferred maintenance to capital improvement. Staff agreed to compile a comprehensive list with metrics and return to the committee. - Surplus Properties: Mr. Shannon presented on 51 surplus properties (totaling about 10 acres) with no planned use. The city maintains a GIS dashboard updated monthly. Chair McKee Rodriguez requested that the list be provided by council district and suggested exploring restrictive covenants to prevent undesirable developments (e.g., gas stations, car washes). Councilmembers discussed the importance of zoning information, maintenance costs, and the potential use of sale proceeds. Councilmember Mungia proposed using proceeds from property sales to fund the deferred maintenance program. Councilmember Spears asked for sales data from the past five years. Staff will provide lists with zoning, environmental constraints, and other details by the March 2026 meeting. Key Outcomes - Staff will provide a comprehensive list of city-owned facilities, including age, condition, last renovation, use data, and geographic distribution, within the coming months. - Staff will provide a list of surplus properties by council district, including zoning, environmental constraints, past sales data, and maintenance costs, by the March 2026 committee meeting. - The committee will consider a policy change to direct proceeds from property sales to the deferred maintenance program or district-specific improvements. - Staff will research the feasibility of implementing restrictive covenants on property sales to prevent undesirable uses. - The next Transportation and Infrastructure Committee meeting is scheduled for February 3, 2026.

The San Antonio City Council committee convened on January 20, 2026, to discuss two major agenda items: a report on the city's facilities maintenance and deferred maintenance processes, and a presentation on the city's surplus property inventory and disposition process. Councilmembers expressed a strong need for comprehensive data on facility conditions, age, usage, and a prioritized list of needs to inform the upcoming bond program. Discussions also focused on the challenges of acquiring properties for public safety facilities, the management of surplus properties, and potential policy changes regarding the use of proceeds from property sales. Consent Calendar - Approval of the minutes from the January 2, 2026 meeting. A motion was made, seconded, and all members voted in favor. Discussion Items Facilities Maintenance and Deferred Maintenance Report - Mike Shannon from the Capital Delivery Department presented an overview of the city's facility portfolio (approximately 500 facilities), including airports, convention centers, adult centers, and public safety buildings. The current deferred maintenance program is funded at $30 million over six years, with an additional $130 million in bond funds and $4.1 billion in capital improvements (including $2.3 billion for streets and airport). - Councilmember Munguía requested a comprehensive list of all facilities, their last renovation date, current condition, and a prioritization methodology. He expressed concern that the bond program over six years can only address a fraction of facilities, leading to a cycle of deferred maintenance and potential surprises. - Councilmember Gabito agreed and asked for a map of all facilities and details on bond projects not completed (three street projects: Roosevelt, drainage in Texta, and one other). He also questioned the status of Fire Station 2 replacement, noting that property acquisition has been challenging for over a year. - Councilmember Alderete highlighted the need to consider expanding existing fire stations as an alternative to new construction and emphasized the importance of property acquisition timelines. - Councilmember Castlehan Spears stressed the need for metrics, ROI, and a cost-benefit analysis to guide maintenance vs. replacement decisions. She requested data on facility age, condition, and usage (e.g., foot traffic) to communicate with constituents and set priorities. - Councilmember Rodriguez noted that the city should have a better understanding of which facilities are most critical, especially those with high public use (e.g., libraries, community centers) that need HVAC and restroom repairs. - Councilmember Munguía also asked about facilities the city operates but does not own (e.g., leased City Tower), and the committee agreed that such properties should be included in the assessment. Surplus Properties Presentation - Staff presented the surplus property inventory: 51 properties totaling approximately 10 acres, ranging from small lots (0.003 acres) to nearly 1 acre. The city maintains an online portal and updates the list monthly. The disposition process follows state law, requiring public notice and fair market valuation, with exceptions for adjacent owners or nonprofits. - Councilmember Munguía requested that the surplus property list be sent by council district, along with zoning information. He suggested using restrictive covenants to prevent undesirable uses (e.g., auto repair shops) and to steer development toward community benefits such as parks or affordable housing. He also proposed that proceeds from sales should return to the district that lost the property, rather than going to the general fund—a sentiment echoed by Councilmember Alderete and supported by others. - Councilmember Spears asked for historical data on sales over the past five to ten years: how many properties were sold, how long they were on the market, and how the process worked. She also wanted to know how often the city reassesses properties. - Councilmember Gabito noted that some properties may have liens that must be paid before funds go to the general fund. Councilmember Castlehan Spears inquired about the total maintenance costs for surplus properties and the equity of their distribution across districts. - Staff agreed to provide the requested lists and data, with an initial update expected at the next meeting (scheduled for early February). Key Outcomes - Staff committed to delivering a comprehensive inventory of all city-owned facilities, including age, condition, last renovation, usage data, and a map of locations. This data will be used to prioritize maintenance and capital replacement in the upcoming bond cycle. - Staff will provide a detailed report on deferred maintenance needs, including the condition assessment of each facility and a multi-year projection of required investments. - For surplus properties, staff will provide a district-by-district list with zoning, size, estimated maintenance costs, and a sales history (past five years). - The council will consider a future policy change to direct proceeds from surplus property sales back to the district where the property is located. - The committee will continue discussions at its next meeting on or about February 1, 2026, with staff providing the requested information.

The San Antonio Zoning Commission met on January 20, 2026, to review numerous rezoning requests, continuances, and minutes approval. The meeting included a consent agenda with multiple items, public comments, and individual hearings. Key topics included requests for infill development, commercial zoning transitions, conditional uses for accessory dwelling units, and specialized projects such as a military-themed short-term rental. Votes were taken on all items, with most receiving approval. Consent Calendar - Items 5, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 20 (as amended), 23, 25, 28, and 29 were approved in a single motion (14-0). These items included requests ranging from neighborhood commercial and residential zoning changes to specific use authorizations and overlays. - For Item 20 (1023 East Ashley Road), the applicant amended the request from MF18 to R4 CD with a conditional use for four dwelling units. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 4 (302 & 306 East Civillos): Robert Aragon (343 Clay Street) opposed, citing ongoing issues with the business behind him—overfilled dumpsters, trash blowing into his yard, and employees/customers urinating behind the dumpster. - Item 7 (201 Wobble Court): Philip Galeno (15410 Way) spoke in support, arguing the proposed new housing would improve neighborhood conditions, deter crime, and encourage families to move in. - Item 12 (326 West Jones Avenue): Emily Neff, representing the San Antonio Museum of Art, voiced support for the zoning change next door to the museum, noting collaboration with McCombs on questions about the proposed tower’s height and materiality. - Voicemails: - Luis Morales (323 East Fest) strongly opposed Item 5 (302 East Fest Street), citing existing traffic, crime, and noise from Bamboo Restaurant. - Rose Hill, president of Government Hill Neighborhood Association, requested postponement of Item 25 (1523 North Alamwood Street), stating the association first saw the request on January 20, 2026, and needed time to review it. - A voicemail from a speaker at 410 East Cheryl Drive raised concerns about property taxes and pest control related to Item 13 (urban farm request). - Item 1 (607 South Comal Street): Patricia Chadwick (Federal Recycling) opposed changing from I2 to IDZ3, fearing it could open the door to less compatible non-industrial operations. Daniel Hernandez, initially opposed, changed his position after hallway conversation. - Item 2 (5650 & 5682 Easterling Lane Drive): Rebecca Flores Bettis (speaking for multiple HOAs) opposed, citing over 200 unresolved code violations and environmental concerns related to River City Ready Mix. She urged the commission not to recommend approval. - Item 3 (5000 block of Easterling Lane Drive): Bettis and William McDonald (8542 Timber Place) opposed, with McDonald noting flooding issues on Calabara Creek, safety hazards from a concrete crossing, and the property’s history as a former waste site. The project applicant argued cleanup was 75-80% complete under court order. - Item 27 (continuance): Lucia Oyverdes opposed the proposed zoning change, citing lack of parking, small lot size, and impacts on her quality of life. Discussion Items - Item 1 (607 South Comal Street): Applicant Jacob Cryfels explained the IDZ3 request with a lumber yard use was needed because the lot (55′ x 75′) cannot meet I2 setbacks (50-foot from non-conforming residential) or parking requirements. Chair Bustamante noted the area’s neglect and supported the change to allow development. The motion to approve passed 11-0. - Item 2 (5650 & 5682 Easterling Lane Drive): Applicant Greg Brockhouse argued the rezoning to C2NA would help the cleanup and relocation of River City Ready Mix by January 31, 2026 court order. The neighborhood association remained opposed. Commissioner Duval expressed concern about commercial uses on dead-end streets within residential blocks, but Chair Bustamante supported the motion as an appropriate land use. The motion to approve passed 10-1 (Duval dissenting). - Item 3 (5000 block of Easterling Lane Drive): Staff recommended C1 (low-intensity commercial) rather than the originally proposed C2. Brockhouse noted the court order requires expedited zoning. The neighborhood opposed, citing history of non-compliance and desire to work with future buyers. Commissioner Sipes argued C1 was inappropriate due to Calabara Creek as a significant edge and lack of access other than Easterling Lane. The motion to approve (C1) passed 10-1 (Sipes dissenting). - Item 4 (302 & 306 East Civillos): Applicant Micah Harper (326 Clay Street) reported that prior opposition was withdrawn after neighborly discussion. The request (IDZ1 with C1 uses and bar/tavern) was approved unanimously. - Item 6 (201 East Courtland Avenue): The applicant (RM4 to IDZ2 for five dwelling units) noted staff had originally suggested MF33, but the chair of the Planning Commission recommended IDZ2. Staff had recommended denial but the commission approved 11-0. - Item 10 (722 Menifee Boulevard): The applicant requested R6 CD for two dwelling units for an existing ADU that was permitted as an owner-occupied property but the owner no longer lived on site. The neighborhood association supported. Commissioner Duval dissented, arguing ADU rules were meant to preserve neighborhood character. The motion passed 10-1. - Item 18 (13526 Nacogdoches Road): Attorney Rob Kill requested C2 CD for construction trades contractor without staff’s recommended 15-foot landscape buffer, arguing it would eliminate 50 parking spaces and narrow access to 13 feet. The commission approved without the buffer, 11-0. - Item 21 (446 Demia Drive): Applicant Garcia requested R6 CD for two dwelling units to allow rental of both units (one originally an ADU). Staff supported. Commissioner Duval dissented. The motion passed 10-1. - Item 24 (2601 Guadalupe Street): Applicant Zambrano amended his request to C2PNA after discussion at the January 14 Planning Commission. Both neighborhood associations supported. The motion to approve as amended passed 11-0. - Item 26 (411 & 417 South San Marcos Street): Applicants proposed an eight-bedroom single-family home for short-term rental to military families. Staff recommended denial (suggesting MF18 with bed-and-breakfast use), but the commission approved IDZ2 with uses permitted in MF33. Commissioner Duval seconded, noting the site’s isolation from residential fabric due to a paper street and industrial neighbors. The motion passed 11-0. Key Outcomes - Consent agenda (14 items) approved without objection. - Item 1 (IDZ3 lumber yard) approved unanimously. - Item 2 (C2NA on Easterling Lane Drive) approved 10-1. - Item 3 (C1 on Easterling Lane Drive) approved 10-1. - Item 4 (IDZ1 bar/tavern) approved unanimously. - Item 6 (IDZ2 five dwelling units) approved unanimously. - Item 10 (R6 CD two dwelling units) approved 10-1. - Item 18 (C2 CD construction trades, no buffer) approved unanimously. - Item 21 (R6 CD two dwelling units) approved 10-1. - Item 24 (C2PNA) approved unanimously as amended. - Item 26 (IDZ2 with MF33 uses) approved unanimously. - December 16, 2025 minutes approved. - All approved consent and individual items will be forwarded to City Council; applicants have six months to appear. Additional Notes - Two continuances were granted: Item 8 (4131 Kaliber Road) continued to February 3, 2026; Items 9, 16, 17, 22, and 27 continued to February 17, 2026. - Item 8 was continued after applicant requested clarification on C3 exclusions. The commission advised reaching out to the case manager and Commissioner Sipes. - Item 27 (Lucia Oyverdes) drew public opposition citing parking and quality of life impacts. - The commission entered executive session (2:12-2:46 PM) for legal advice on items related to court orders and code enforcement.

The San Antonio Planning Commission held a special meeting on January 16, 2026, at 9:05 AM to consider a single agenda item: a request for the City of San Antonio to consent to the creation of a Municipal Utility District (MUD) for the Guajalote Ranch (also referred to as Wahote Ranch) subdivision, a proposed 3,000-home development in Bexar County's ETJ. The meeting included a staff presentation, applicant presentation, voicemail and in-person public testimony, and commissioner discussion. The commission voted to recommend denial of the city's consent. Public Comments & Testimony - Over 60 individuals submitted voicemails or spoke in person, nearly all opposed to the MUD. - Opponents raised concerns about: potential contamination of the Edwards and Trinity aquifers from a planned wastewater treatment plant discharging up to 1 million gallons per day into Helotes Creek; increased flooding and traffic on rural roads; lack of emergency access (single ingress/egress); high property taxes from MUD bonds; inconsistency with the North Sector Plan (designated country tier); and the developer's out-of-state status. - Notable speakers included State Representative Mark Dorazio (HD 122), who opposed the MUD, and representatives from the Conservation Society, Sierra Club, Scenic Loop Helotes Creek Alliance, City of Grey Forest, and nearby MUD board members. - The applicant, Kevin DeAnda (Ortiz McKnight, representing Lennar Homes), rebutted that the MUD would provide oversight, that the wastewater plant would use advanced membrane bioreactor treatment, and that the development already holds TCEQ and SAWS approvals. Discussion Items - Staff from the Planning Department presented the request for city consent to create MUD No. 2 in Bexar County, noting the purpose is to finance infrastructure (water, sewer, drainage, roads) for the 1,160-acre site. The development agreement includes nine SAWS requirements, annexation provisions, and compliance with city regulations. - Commissioners questioned the applicant about: the necessity of the MUD v. alternative financing; the wastewater treatment plant’s operator qualifications and oversight; bond repayment via property taxes (capped at $1 per $100 valuation); the board selection process; and the consequences of city denial. - The applicant stated that without city consent, the developer could still petition TCEQ directly for the MUD, but the city would lose leverage (e.g., annexation rights, additional enforcement). - Commissioner discussion centered on balancing water quality protection, community opposition, and the city’s ability to influence the development. Key Outcomes - A motion to recommend denial of the city's consent to the creation of the MUD was made by Councilman Mungia and seconded by Commissioner Sanchez. - The motion passed (the chair declared it passed; roll call showed Commissioners Garcia, DeSucci, and Mylam in favor of denial; Commissioners Sanchez, Oulette, Siegel, Profit, and Chair Peck opposed). - The recommendation will be forwarded to the San Antonio City Council for final action at its February 5, 2026 meeting.

The San Antonio City Council met on Thursday, January 15, 2026, at 9:07 AM, with Mayor Gina Ortiz Jones presiding. The meeting included recognitions, a consent agenda with 25 items, individual agenda items for the appointment of a new CPS Energy Trustee and an ordinance authorizing an offer to purchase federal properties for the sports and entertainment district project (Project Marvel), public testimony, and executive session. The meeting adjourned at 1:40 PM. Points of Privilege - Recognition of Malia Sessar, a Trinity University student and member of the Philippine women's national soccer team, for winning gold at the 33rd Southeast Asian Games. - Recognition of Catalea Perez, a 13-year-old student from Southwest ISD who was the only student from Texas selected for the Stanford University Middle School Scholars Program. - Recognition of five graduate students from UC Berkeley Goldman School of Public Policy visiting to study Texas policy. - Recognition of the South Texas Blood and Tissue Center and proclamation of January as National Blood Donor Month. Councilman Mungia noted his personal history as a donor and urged donations. - Proclamation declaring January 19, 2026, as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Day. Speakers included Councilman McKee Rodriguez and representatives from the MLK Commission. Councilman Galvan quoted Dr. King on economic equality. Consent Calendar - Items 7 through 31 were approved as a group, with several items highlighted by council members: - Item 18: $8.6 million grant for Greenway Trail expansion near Leon Creek. - Item 12: Award to San Antonio Concepts Construction for infrastructure work, praised for professionalism and community engagement. - Item 21: Appointment of Dr. Sonia Hasso to the Education Commission for District 6. - Item 23: Renaming the District 6 field office community room to the Martin Trevino Community Room in honor of a former staff member. - Item 31: Ordinance approving a funding agreement with VIA Metropolitan Transit for up to $150,000 to provide free semester bus passes for middle and high school students as a pilot program to combat chronic absenteeism. The funds come from District 7's budget (Councilwoman Alderete Gavito). - The consent agenda was moved and seconded, and passed unanimously after council discussion. Public Comments & Testimony On Consent Agenda Item 31 (VIA bus passes): - Jack Finger opposed, questioning why the city is funding transportation when parents and school buses should handle it, and suggesting the pilot favors Council District 7. - Dahlia Flores Contreras (CEO, City Education Partners) supported, citing 26% chronic absenteeism citywide and transportation barriers. - Diane Fernandez (Executive Director of Enrollment, SAISD) supported, noting 28% of SAISD students are chronically absent and transportation costs are a barrier. - Dr. Atica Shimshek (Superintendent, Jubilee Academies) supported, stating that 86% of Jubilee students are economically disadvantaged and transportation is a key issue. - Ray Tiharina (South San ISD spokesperson) supported, reporting 36.8% chronic absenteeism in South San ISD and 46.7% for students with disabilities, costing the district over $500,000 in state funding. - Sharon Samuelson Masyate (CEO, Mobile Education Center for All) supported, citing a Futuro San Antonio report that 43% of families identify transportation as a leading cause of absences. - Pastor Vincent Robinson supported, stating he serves the 78207 zip code (most impoverished) and sees transportation barriers daily. - Francis Berronis Johnson (Superintendent/CEO, Triumph Public High Schools) supported, noting many students balance work and school without reliable transportation. - James Ward (senior at Triumph High School) supported, sharing his personal experience using VIA to get to school when his family lacked a car. - Jessica Palacios (San Antonio Hispanic Chamber of Commerce) supported, emphasizing workforce development and citing that 43% of families report transportation barriers. - Amanda Pierre (resident, District 2) supported, describing her reliance on VIA as a single mother on disability. - Sandra Torres (mother, District 5) supported through an interpreter, explaining the financial burden of daily bus fares ($1.30/day, over $400/year per student). - Inga Cotton supported, sharing that her son on the autism spectrum used VIA to get to school and volunteer. - Jenny Margot Gonzalez supported, speaking as a parent of teenagers and noting chronic absenteeism statistics. - Several other speakers echoed support for the pilot program. On Individual Item 6 (Federal property acquisition for Project Marvel): - Cindy Munch opposed, raising concerns about lack of transparency, the use of non-disclosure agreements, the $4 million annual rent on a $1.3 billion arena, and the redirecting of tax revenues to TIRZs. She questioned why the Spurs do not buy the property directly and argued public ownership does not generate tax revenue. Discussion Items Items 4 & 5 – Appointment of Dr. Erica Gonzalez Reyes to CPS Energy Board: - The council considered resolutions confirming Dr. Gonzalez (CEO of Stampa, an allergist/immunologist) as Northeast Quadrant Trustee for CPS Energy (term Feb 1, 2026 – Jan 31, 2031) and to the San Antonio Energy Acquisition Public Facility Corporation Board (term Feb 1, 2026 – Jan 31, 2027). - Public comment: Jack Finger questioned her qualifications regarding rate increases and data center costs. - Council members (Corr, Mungia, Castillo, Galvan, Alderete Gavito, Mesa Gonzalez, White, McKee Rodriguez) praised her background in public health, small business, and community leadership. They emphasized the need for ratepayer protection, equity, and transparency. - The items were approved unanimously, and Dr. Gonzalez was sworn in. Item 6 – Ordinance for Federal Property Acquisition (727 E. Cesar Chavez Blvd. and adjacent lots): - Staff presented: The city proposes to offer $30 million (plus up to $120,000 closing costs) to the U.S. General Services Administration for 5.7 acres of federal properties, based on an appraisal of $29.995 million. The San Antonio Spurs will provide the $30 million and cover closing costs. The property would be used for mixed-use development as part of the sports and entertainment district (arena project). A contingency deed allows the city to retain title if the arena project proceeds; if not, the city can reimburse the Spurs or transfer title to them. The offer deadline is Jan 26, 2026. - Council discussion: - Councilman McKee Rodriguez queried why the Spurs cannot buy the land directly (answer: federal negotiated sale only to public entities). He asked if the property was named in community engagement; staff said the mixed-use development was identified in presentations. He expressed concern about the need for city input on future development. - Councilman Viagran stressed the importance of retaining downtown property and controlling development. - Councilman Galvan echoed the need for city input and alignment with sustainability and affordable housing goals. - Councilwoman Alderete Gavito supported continued community input. - Councilwoman Castillo raised concerns about the McKinney-Vento Act process: she requested a list of homeless service providers who deemed the site unsuitable. Staff explained that HHS posted a screening, and an appeal was made, but no entity ultimately applied. She urged the council to ensure affordable housing on the site. - Mayor Jones made a motion to delay the vote until Jan 22 to obtain the list, but there was no second; the motion did not proceed. Castillo said she would work directly with staff on affordability. - The item was approved unanimously. Key Outcomes - Consent Agenda (Items 7-31): Approved without objection. - Items 4 & 5 (Dr. Erica Gonzalez Reyes appointments): Approved unanimously; she was sworn in. - Item 6 (Federal property acquisition): Approved unanimously. The city will submit a $30 million offer to GSA by Jan 26, 2026, funded by the Spurs. If the arena project does not proceed, the city may reimburse the Spurs or transfer title. - Executive Session: The council met in closed session from 11:25 AM to 1:39 PM to discuss economic development, real property, and legal issues. No action was taken. Next Steps: The city manager will submit the offer for the federal properties; staff will work on definitive agreements for the arena project and brief the council. The VIA bus pass pilot program will launch with metrics tracked by VIA and reported to the council.

The San Antonio City Council held its first regular meeting of 2026 on January 15, 2026, beginning at 9:07 a.m. The meeting opened with a song, an invocation by Father Martin of the Archdiocese of San Antonio, and the Pledge of Allegiance. The council addressed a consent agenda, several privilege items, and individual agenda items including the confirmation of a CPS Energy trustee and a proposal to acquire federal properties for the downtown arena development. Consent Calendar - The minutes of the December 10, 17, and 18, 2025 meetings were approved by a voice vote without objection. - Councilmember Munguía highlighted Agenda Item 18, a grant for expansion of the train crossing at Dion Creek/Peter Park to connect to the Leon Creek trail. - Councilmember Castillo praised Agenda Item 2, a General Fund award to Advanced Transportation for infrastructure projects, noting positive resident feedback. - Councilmember White highlighted Item 20, the appointment of Gerald Mulberry (meteorologist) to the Storm Water position. - Councilmember White also spoke on Item 21, the appointment of Dr. Sonia Jasso to the educational commission for District 6, thanking her for her service. - Councilmember White spoke on Item 23, naming a District 6 field office conference room in honor of the late Martín Treviño, a former community staffer, thanking the family. - Mayor Jones asked VIA officials how the pilot program for free student passes would be measured. VIA responded that they track the existing student pass program through schools and their own data, and can share metrics. The consent calendar (Items 7-31) was approved by voice vote with no objections. Item 24 was removed from the agenda the previous day. Public Comments & Testimony On Agenda Item 31 (VIA free student bus passes): - Jack Finger questioned why the city was funding student passes when parents and school districts should be responsible, and noted that VIA already offers semester passes for $28.50. - Dalia Contreras (mentor) supported the passes, saying 26% of local students are chronically absent, and transportation is a major barrier. She urged approval. - Diane Fernandez (Executive Director, San Antonio ISD) supported the pilot, noting that 38% of students in the district are chronically absent, and that passes provide equity and access. - Dr. Atica Chenchak (Superintendent of a charter school) supported the passes, stating that 16% of families come from economically disadvantaged homes and transportation is a barrier to attendance. - Rey Tijerina (veteran and business owner) supported the passes, citing that chronic absenteeism costs the district over $500,000 annually in lost funding, and that 36.8% of students in the south are chronically absent. - Sharon Sanusi (educator, NCO Movil) supported, stating that 43% of families in their program cited transportation as a barrier, the second most common reason for absenteeism. - Pastor Stevenson supported the passes, stating that 33% of families identified transportation as a barrier, and that chronic absenteeism is a strong predictor of dropping out. - Francis Verones (CEO, a recovery program) supported the passes, noting that transportation is the most consistent barrier for students trying to stay in school. - James Ward (student) supported the passes, sharing that he has to travel 8 miles to school and his family has no car, making the passes critical for consistent attendance. - Jessica Palacios (Hispanic Chamber of Commerce) supported the passes, stating that 43% of families say transportation is the barrier and 27% support free passes as a solution. - Amanda Pierce (resident, District 2) supported the passes, noting she is a single mother with five children and struggles to afford transportation. - Sandra Torres (resident, District 5) supported the passes, stating her family pays over $400 a year in daily fares to get one child to school, and that two buses are needed each way. - Inga Cotton (Executive Director, San Antonio Charter Moms) supported the passes, sharing that her children with autism rely on VIA to get to school and activities. - Jenny Margo González supported the passes, stating that chronic absenteeism is a barrier and that the passes would allow her nonprofit to redirect funds to other needs. On Agenda Items 4 & 5 (CPS Energy Trustee Confirmation): - Jack Finger questioned Dr. González's qualifications for a utility board, citing her medical background and expressing concern about rate increases. He asked whether she would require data centers to pay their share or pass costs to residents. On Agenda Item 6 (Federal Property Acquisition for Arena): - Cindy Monch spoke in opposition, stating she has lost faith in the Marvel project and that the city has not been transparent. She questioned why the Spurs could not purchase the property directly, and expressed concern that the city is taking on debt without new TIRZ revenue. Discussion Items Agenda Items 4 & 5 – Confirmation of Dr. Erika G. González to CPS Energy Board: Mayor Jones introduced the nomination, noting Dr. González's background as a physician, her experience as a small business owner, and her work on public health and diversity. Dr. González stated she will be "a voice for the community" and will promote safety and well-being. Councilmembers expressed strong support, noting her medical expertise in asthma (relevant to air quality), her understanding of small businesses, and her previous role during the COVID vaccine rollout. Councilmember Galván emphasized the need for affordable and reliable energy and clean air. Councilmember Mesa González thanked her for volunteering and stated she will put residents first. Councilmember White asked about her compassion for residents facing rate increases. The council voted to confirm the nomination. The City Secretary then administered the oath of office to Dr. González. Agenda Item 6 – Acquisition of Federal Properties for Downtown Arena: Ben Gorzell (City staff) presented the item. The city is seeking authorization to submit an offer of $30 million plus closing costs to the U.S. government for three parcels (727 César Chávez Blvd, 610 and 611 Indiana Street) totaling 5.7 acres, based on an appraisal of $29.9 million. The San Antonio Spurs will provide $30 million for the purchase and pay $120,000 in closing costs, with the city holding the title. If the arena project does not proceed, the city can either reimburse the Spurs and keep the property, or if the city chooses not to reimburse, the property transfers to the Spurs. A $3 million deposit (from the Spurs) will be included. The offer must be sent to GSA by January 16, 2026. GSA has up to 28 days to respond, and closing would take 60 days. Councilmember Mickey Rodríguez asked why the Spurs cannot buy the property directly. Gorzell explained that the federal disposal process only allows sales to public entities (city, state, county). Rodríguez affirmed this is a backstop for the city, and that any development on the property must meet city goals (affordable housing, parks, green space). Councilmember Villagran expressed support, emphasizing the need for the city to retain control of downtown property to keep it affordable. She called for a broader strategic conversation about city-owned property in the downtown core, including historic preservation. Councilmember Castillo asked to postpone the vote until information about homeless providers who determined the property was not suitable for affordable housing could be obtained. The motion was made but not seconded, so it died. Castillo will work with staff on that issue. Mayor Jones clarified that the federal process involved: HHS initially found the property unsuitable, then an appeal led to an RFP, to which no entity responded. The city's offer is now being presented. Councilmember Alderete Gavito reiterated the need for community voices and affordable housing in the project, and asked for a list of providers who declared the property not suitable for housing. Staff will obtain that list from the federal government. Councilmember Galván confirmed he is comfortable with the backstop. The council voted on the item and it passed. Key Outcomes - Approved consent calendar (Items 7-31) by voice vote. - Approved nomination and appointment of Dr. Erika G. González to the CPS Energy Board for a term ending January 31, 2026 (for PEA) and January 31, 2031 (for CPS Energy). - Approved Agenda Item 6, authorizing the city manager to execute the contract and submit an offer to purchase the federal properties for $30 million. - The meeting recessed at 11:25 a.m. for an executive session (topics: economic development negotiation, purchase/exchange/lease of real property, and legal matters). The council reconvened at 1:39 p.m., took no action in executive session, and adjourned at 1:40 p.m.