Public Meetings - San Antonio, Texas

Discussion Items - Presentation of Legislative Program: Sally (staff) presented a comprehensive overview of the proposed state legislative agenda for the 90th Texas Legislature, which begins in January 2027. Key elements included: - Anticipated composition changes: 24 new House members and 5 new Senate members, including two from the San Antonio delegation. - Critical dates: November 9, 2026, for pre-filing bills; February 12, 2027, for the start of the session; and a deadline for bill introductions with up to 9,000 bills expected. - Priority funding areas: Southwest Parkway, downtown entertainment and sports district, flood infrastructure, CPS Energy, and water services. - Policy objectives: protecting local decision-making (75% of efforts focus on defending against preemption), securing fiscal stability and triple-A bond rating, opposing unfunded mandates, supporting economic growth, and non-discrimination language. - Specific initiatives: Military City USA (protecting Joint Base San Antonio missions), infrastructure resilience (flood mitigation, bridge improvements), data center regulation (ensuring costs don't shift to residential customers), parks funding (at least five parks), early childhood education (childcare for apprentices), affordable housing, homelessness services, public safety, mental health, animal welfare, and domestic violence prevention. - Committee Feedback: Council members provided extensive input: - President (chair) emphasized proactive engagement with local delegations, visiting Austin early, and building relationships with rural members unfamiliar with city operations. Suggested leveraging upcoming budget deficit to seek state support. - Council Member Tegavito (likely Gabito) stressed using council members to press state legislators, supporting all listed priorities, and adding issues like military unit loss (MIBAD team relocated to North Carolina), mental health hospital for Bexar County, animal welfare policies, anti-fraud protections for crypto kiosks, postal theft, speed reduction programs, child protection (removing children from homes), and childcare funding. - Council Member Munguía raised concerns about road conditions to Lackland Air Force Base (Highway 90), flooding on Leon Creek affecting access, need for a psychiatric hospital on the south side, and addressing homelessness with local resources. - Council Member Mesa González thanked staff, highlighted the importance of protecting local regulations (e.g., tree ordinances, contamination controls) from state preemption, supported data center oversight to limit residential cost shifts, urged alignment with South Texas cities, and called for strengthening SB6 implementation to preserve local authority over utility infrastructure. - Council Member Spears requested earlier presentation materials, emphasized measuring success, tracking federal grants for homelessness, and increasing resident engagement. She supported pilot programs, collaboration with the Economic Development Council, and mental health services. She also asked for details on coalition membership costs (noted on slide 19). Key Outcomes - Staff will incorporate all committee feedback into a revised legislative program. - The next committee meeting will present only changes based on input rather than the full presentation, to save time. - Council members committed to traveling to Austin, engaging with state legislators, and involving residents through neighborhood associations. - The committee requested ongoing tracking of positions taken on bills and the ability to see how each bill is voted. - No formal votes were taken during this informational presentation.

The Governmental Relations Committee met on August 4, 2026, at 10:09 AM to review the first draft of the City of San Antonio's 90th State Legislative Program. The meeting was chaired by Councilmember McKee Rodriguez, and all committee members were present. Sally, the Government Affairs Director, presented the draft program, which outlines priority areas and policy objectives for the upcoming Texas legislative session beginning January 2027. Committee members provided feedback and suggested additions, emphasizing proactive engagement with the state delegation and other stakeholders. Discussion Items - Presentation of Draft Legislative Program: Sally presented the draft program, covering four funding priorities: South Texas Parkway (East-West State Spur), Downtown Sports and Entertainment District, flood infrastructure, and protection of municipal utilities (CPS Energy and SAWS). Policy objectives include preserving municipal authority, ensuring fiscal stability (including opposing unfunded mandates), supporting community welfare, and non-discrimination. Issue areas span local government governance, military city USA, infrastructure and resilience, community development, and public health and safety. - Committee Member Feedback: - Chair McKee Rodriguez emphasized relationship-building with the delegation, hosting influential state legislators in San Antonio, focusing on education funding as a top community priority, advocating for new revenue streams to address the city's budget deficit, and requesting state funding for state-owned roads within the city (e.g., South WB in District 2). He also raised the need for an evaluation framework for the lobbying team. - Councilmember Alderete Gavito supported the priorities and raised specific topics: addressing the loss of Army North/South commands by focusing on military medicine and cybersecurity; renewing the Texas spay/neuter program; targeting backyard breeders; strengthening fraud prevention for crypto kiosks; lowering prima facie speed limits; advocating for child protection laws and increased Child Care Services (CCS) funding; and pushing for a psychiatric hospital in Bexar County. - Councilmember Mungia called for better public education financing, discussing possible school district consolidation, a new hospital on the south side, improvements to state roads near Lackland Air Force Base (Military Drive and Highway 90), support for the South Texas Parkway, addressing flooding on Leon Creek threatening Lackland AFB, and stronger state action on homelessness. - Councilmember Mesa Gonzalez stressed protecting Camp Bullis and Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA), leveraging state partnerships for resources, regulating data centers to ensure costs fall on developers not residents (supporting disciplined implementation of SV6), and tracking opportunities for mental health diversion centers and school voucher impacts. - Councilmember Spears emphasized pursuing all available grants, leaning into executive orders on homelessness, collaborating with the military transformation task force, defining success metrics for lobbying, timely bill tracking, engaging residents, and utilizing regional bodies like ACOG and MPO. She also requested cost information for memberships in advocacy groups. - Other Topics: The chair noted that future subcommittee meetings would focus on education. The committee discussed coordination with smaller cities, the South Texas Triangle, and ensuring regional economic development. Key Outcomes - The committee expressed overall support for the draft program and directed staff to send it to all council members and the mayor for feedback. Staff will provide a high-level summary of received feedback at the next meeting. - Staff will incorporate feedback and return with a refined program for the next IGR committee meeting, aiming for council approval by October 2025 (before bill filing begins November 9, 2025). - The chair committed to scheduling meetings with each member of the San Antonio state delegation, as well as influential non-delegation legislators, to build relationships and allies. - Staff will provide an evaluation framework for the lobbying team for future discussion. - Meeting adjourned at 11:16 AM.

The San Antonio Zoning Commission met on Tuesday, August 4, 2026, at 1:00 PM, chaired by John Bustamante. The meeting was adjourned at 2:09 PM. Commissioners present: Rob Sipes (D7), John Kelly (D8), Danny Kellum (D1), John Witsett (D10), Moses Duvel (D9), Mia LSF (D2), Ken Hui (D6), George Inohosa (D3), Eddie Peter Ligas (D4), Moshgan Pana (Mayor's appointee), and Chair Bustamante (D5). A quorum was present. Consent Calendar - Items 4, 5, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13 were approved en bloc on a motion by Commissioner Hui, seconded by Commissioner Kellum, by a unanimous roll‑call vote. These items included zoning changes for properties at 829 West Harlan Avenue, 3759/3791 Pleasanton Road and 11 West Petaluma Boulevard, 2000 South Preso Street, 171 Heimer Road, 4200 block of Nacoperin Boulevard, 16000 block of Apple White Road, and 2113 Lamb Road. Notable: Item 5 received support from the Harlandale McCullum Neighborhood Association; Item 8 was supported by the Roosevelt Park Neighborhood Association with a condition that alcohol distillation storage be used for consumption only. No public comments were received on consent items. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 6 (Blanco Road Large Area Rezoning): April Maldonado (825 Westwood) spoke in opposition. She stated that the blanket rezoning did not allow property owners on the east side of Blanco Road to opt out of the proposed RM4 (residential mixed) designation, and that the change from existing industrial to C2 commercial and R4 to RM4 increased intensity contrary to the 2002 Edison neighborhood plan. She requested a smaller‑scale approach and more time for neighbors to understand the proposal. She presented a petition with signatures from one street. Commissioner Kellum questioned her, and she confirmed she had met with District 1 staff and had received an exemption for her own property. She spoke on behalf of residents, noting the Edison Neighborhood Association is not currently registered. - Item 9 (15234 Classen Road rezoning): Umberto Salman (16835 Winding Oak Drive) spoke in opposition, stating that his Mystic Lake HOA opposed the change from R6 to R6C (though this comment appeared to refer to a different, unrelated zoning; he opposed the proposed volleyball facility). Doug Welch (Vice President/Acting President, Briarwick Neighborhood Association) spoke neither supporting nor opposing, but asked for time to negotiate a restrictive covenant to address noise, traffic safety, and overflow parking concerns. He noted the property is near a new city park, a railroad crossing, and a floodplain/wetlands area. Discussion Items - Item 6 – Blanco Road Large Area Rezoning (Z2026-107-00060): Staff recommended approval of 118 zoning and land use changes along the Blanco Road corridor between Fresno Street and West Hildebrand Avenue, extending 300 feet east and west. The proposal rezoned industrial and commercial parcels to commercial and residential mixed districts, and changed some single‑family (R4) to residential mixed (RM4) to allow up to four dwelling units. City Council initiated the LAR via a resolution on April 30, 2026. Staff held two community meetings and posted signs. 306 notices were mailed: 1 in favor, 12 opposed; outside 200 feet, 0 in favor, 2 opposed. The North Central and Beacon Hill Alliance neighborhood associations did not respond. Commissioner Kellum, the district commissioner, moved approval, citing overall benefits and the opportunity for property owners to seek exemptions before the City Council hearing on September 3, 2026. Commissioners discussed the increase in density from R4 to RM4 (100% increase) and noted that the industrial‑to‑C2 change was a downzoning. The motion passed 11–0. - Item 9 – Zoning from C3NA to C2S with Specific Use Authorization for fitness center/health club, gymnasium, natatorium, sport court with outdoor uses (15234 Classen Road): The applicant, Caroline McDonald (Brown & McDonald), proposed a volleyball facility (D’s Sandbar) with indoor and outdoor sand courts. Current zoning C3NA allows intense uses like bars and auto repair; the proposed C2S is a downzoning that eliminates those uses. The site is near a new city park and a railroad crossing. 12 notices mailed: 0 in favor, 0 opposed; no registered neighborhood association within 200 feet. The applicant presented a site plan with 56 parking spaces and a detention pond for floodplain management. Operational hours: Monday–Friday 3:30 PM–11 PM, Saturday 9 AM–6 PM, Sunday 10:30 AM–7:30 PM. Outdoor lighting and music would be directed away from the neighborhood. Overflow parking would be arranged with adjacent properties south of the railroad tracks, with a shuttle service. The Briarwick Neighborhood Association asked for a restrictive covenant to address noise and traffic safety. Commissioner Witsett moved approval with a condition of downward‑facing outdoor lighting. The motion passed 10–1 (Commissioner Hui voted no, citing pedestrian safety concerns near the railroad crossing). Key Outcomes - Consent Agenda: Approved unanimously (11–0). - Continuances: Items 2 and 7 were continued to the August 18, 2026, meeting on a motion by Commissioner Hui, seconded by Commissioner Duvel, approved unanimously. - Item 6 (Blanco Road LAR): Approved 11–0. The recommendation will go to City Council on September 3, 2026. Property owners may seek exemptions from the RM4 designation before that hearing. - Item 9 (15234 Classen Road): Approved 10–1, with a condition of downward‑facing lighting. The case is scheduled for City Council on September 3, 2026. The applicant agreed to continue discussions with the neighborhood on restrictive covenants, pedestrian access, and shuttle service. - Minutes of July 21, 2026: Approved by acclamation. - Adjournment: The meeting adjourned at 2:09 PM.

The San Antonio Board of Adjustment (BOA) met on August 3, 2026, starting at 2:00 PM and adjourning at 4:32 PM (with a 7-minute recess). The board considered eight agenda items, including variances and special exceptions related to short-term rentals, accessory structures, communication towers, fences, school height, residential development, and a mobile food court. Votes required 9 affirmative votes (75% of total 11 members) for approval. Public Comments & Testimony - Case 1 (2042 Chitim Trail Drive): Kevin Kate, a neighbor within 200 feet, initially expressed concerns about short-term rentals lowering neighborhood quality but after meeting the applicants, stated he could support the request if the owners are responsible. He noted difficulty contacting the city about the case. Christopher Gessing, a neighbor at 2026 Chitim Trail, opposed the special exception, citing traffic, parking, noise, and safety issues from existing short-term rentals in the area; he felt the board should consider the impact on families. - Case 4 (1224 West French Place): Henry Crausey, representing the Beacon Hill Neighborhood Association, requested a postponement because the association had not received proper notification. The applicant agreed to a postponement to September 28, 2026. Discussion Items - Case 1 – Special Exception for Short-Term Rental (Type 2) at 2042 Chitim Trail Drive: The applicant, Iris González (representing her parents), purchased the property after city staff confirmed only one active short-term rental permit in the block, but later discovered a second permit had been reinstated due to a technical error. The property is currently vacant and the family invested retirement savings. Staff recommended denial. The board debated the city's error and the applicant's reliance on incorrect information. - Case 2 – Variances for Accessory Structure at 207 Alexander Hamilton Drive: The property owner seeks to build a two-story garage with a carport, exceeding NCD-7 height, square footage, and setback limits. Staff recommended denial due to non-compliance with neighborhood conservation district standards. No public speakers. - Case 3 – Variance for Wireless Communication Tower at 25300 (address unclear, near IH-410): Request to reduce the minimum setback from 166 feet to 132 feet (34-foot intrusion) for a tower in a floodplain area. Staff recommended approval. No opposition. - Case 4 – Multiple Variances for Accessory Structure at 1224 West French Place: The applicant requested five variances for an existing unpermitted carport. The Beacon Hill Neighborhood Association said they were not notified; the applicant agreed to a postponement to allow proper outreach. The board approved a continuance to September 28, 2026. - Case 5 – Variances for Fence Height and Clear Sight at 815 St. James Street: The owner, Steve Ojeda, requested an 8-foot privacy fence in the front and side yards and a variance for clear sight area after a home invasion where his dog was killed. Staff recommended approval for the clear sight variance but denial for the fence height. The board heard testimony about safety concerns. - Case 6 – Variances for School Building Height at 3501 Martin Luther King Drive: Moody Nolan Architecture sought variances to build a three-story, 55-foot-tall school (MLK Academy) on an R4-zoned site, exceeding the 2.5-story/35-foot limit. Staff recommended approval. No public opposition. Commissioner Cruz recused herself due to a conflict of interest. - Case 7 – Multiple Variances for Residential Development at 224 Dora Street: The applicant requested variances for a three-story house on a 25-foot-wide lot, including reduced setbacks, increased impervious cover, and allowance for a third story. Staff recommended denial. The board debated the feasibility of a third story versus a 2.5-story design. - Case 8 – Variance for Mobile Food Court at 922-916 Eastern Street: The applicant sought a 150-foot setback variance (required 200 feet) from residential uses for a food truck park. Staff recommended denial, citing potential noise, light, and traffic impacts. The applicant noted neighborhood support and existing commercial character. Key Outcomes - Case 1: Approved (9-1-1). One commissioner voted no (Cruz), one abstained (Odín). Conditions: permit valid for three years, subject to compliance and future review. - Case 2: Approved unanimously (11-0). All variances granted as moved. - Case 3: Approved unanimously. - Case 4: Postponed to September 28, 2026, to allow proper notification of the neighborhood association. - Case 5: Clear sight variance approved unanimously. Fence variance amended to allow 6-foot front fence (instead of 8 feet) and 8-foot rear fence; motion passed 9-2 (Commissioners Mena and Benavides opposed). - Case 6: Approved unanimously (with Commissioner Cruz recused). - Case 7: The board voted on separate variances: - Items 1 (arterial street setback), 3 (reduced rear setback), and 4 (impervious cover) passed unanimously. - Item 2 (three-foot side setback) passed unanimously on reconsideration. - Item 5 (third story) initially failed 8-2 (needed 9 votes). A subsequent motion to allow a third story with a 50% conditioned space limit also failed 8-2. Therefore, the third-story variance was denied. The applicant may build a 2.5-story structure under existing code. - Case 8: Approved unanimously. Mobile food court variance granted subject to all city operational regulations. No consent calendar was presented. The meeting concluded with a brief director's report and adjournment.

The San Antonio Planning Commission convened on July 22, 2026, at 2:00 PM, with Chair Peck presiding. A quorum was present. The meeting included a consent agenda and an individual hearing item (Case 16) regarding a land use amendment and rezoning request. The meeting adjourned at 2:43 PM. Consent Calendar - The consent agenda, consisting of items where staff recommended approval and no public speakers were signed up, was approved by a unanimous roll call vote. Item 13 was withdrawn, and item 14 was postponed to August 12, 2026, as noted before the vote. Public Comments & Testimony - Randy Lee Barnes (resident, 106 Shadellite Terrace) spoke in support of the city's mapping update but expressed concern about confusing mailers sent to the Morning Park subdivision. He requested clearer, common-sense communication for residents, many of whom are new to the neighborhood. He noted that the land his house sits on was originally farmland purchased by the U.S. military in 1956. Discussion Items - Item 16 – Request for Plan Amendment and Rezoning (3100 block of South Givers Street): The applicant, Adriel Ramirez (Infinity Real Properties), sought approval to amend the Southeast Community Area Plan from Urban Low Density Residential to Regional Mixed Use and rezone the property to C-3 NA CD (General Commercial, Non-Alcoholic Sales District with a Conditional Use for construction trades contractor). The proposed development is a 15-unit office/warehouse flex space for small contractors (e.g., plumbers, electricians). The project includes a 30-foot buffer, fencing, and parking at 4 spaces per unit. Staff recommended denial, citing inconsistency with the existing land use pattern and intrusion into a residential block. The Zoning Commission had recommended approval the previous day. The applicant stated he personally spoke with all neighbors within 200 feet, all of whom were supportive. Commissioners raised concerns about tree preservation, stormwater runoff, impervious cover, perimeter fencing, and future uses of the property. The applicant noted the city-owned retention pond adjacent and that the site currently has drainage and trash issues. The commission voted first on a motion to deny (failed 2-8) and then on a motion to approve (passed 8-2). Key Outcomes - Consent Agenda: Approved unanimously. - Item 16 (Plan Amendment and Rezoning): Approved by a vote of 8-2 (Commissioners DeSucci and Bustamante dissenting). The motion to deny failed 2-8. The approval includes the requested land use amendment to Regional Mixed Use and the C-3 NA CD zoning with conditions (construction trades contractor, Monday–Saturday 7 AM–8 PM, Sunday 7 AM–6 PM, down-facing lighting, no temporary signage, screening for outdoor storage).

The San Antonio Zoning Commission met on July 22, 2026, at 2:00 PM. The meeting included a consent agenda, public comment, and a contested rezoning request for a mixed-use flex space development. The commission voted to approve the rezoning after a debate over future uses and neighbor engagement. Consent Calendar - The commission approved the consent agenda, which included routine items. Item 11 was corrected: the agenda stated "Broach" but should be "Road." Item 15 (originally listed for individual hearing) was moved to the consent calendar and approved. Item 13 was withdrawn, and Item 14 was postponed to August 1, 2026. The consent agenda passed unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Randy Lee Barnes (106 Terrace, San Antonio) spoke. He inherited his home, purchased in 1956 for $9,500, now valued at $175,000. He expressed confusion about the informational packet sent by the city, asking for a clearer, more sensible version for the neighborhood. He appreciated the city's efforts to put properties on the map but requested an update that residents could understand. He also noted that only two original families remain in his neighborhood. Discussion Items - Item 16 – Rezoning for Mixed-Use Flex Space (C3NA with Conditional Use) - The proposal was for a rezoning of a 0.71-acre lot at 31 Gibbers Block (south of Gibbers Road) from residential to mixed-use commercial (C3NA) with a conditional use for construction and contractor services. The applicant, Adriel Ramírez, plans to develop 15 units of flex space (office/warehouse) for small contractors, with rental rates between $1,400 and $1,500 per unit. The property is adjacent to a city-owned retention pond, a restaurant, and commercial offices. A residential neighbor is set back 30–45 feet from the proposed construction. - The applicant stated he spoke with all neighbors within a 200-foot radius, door-to-door, and received no opposition. He provided a list of contacts to the Highland Park Neighborhood Association and District 3. One neighbor, John Medina, expressed interest in renting a unit. Another neighbor, Mr. Ramos (who sold the pond to the city), complained about trash and homeless encampments on the site, which the applicant plans to clean up. - Commissioners raised concerns about tree preservation, impervious surface drainage, fencing (6-foot solid fence on the east side), traffic capacity on Gibbers Road, and future uses that could be allowed under C3 zoning (e.g., auto repair). The applicant argued that the low visibility of the site would deter heavy commercial uses, and that the market would naturally limit tenants to small contractors. The Planning Commission had recommended approval the previous day. - The commission debated whether the conditional use (C3 CD) should be more restrictive. The applicant declined to change to C2 zoning, arguing that all similar flex space developments in San Antonio use C3. The C3 CD includes operating hours (7 AM–8 PM Monday–Saturday, 7 AM–6 PM Sunday) and restrictions on temporary signs and lighting. Key Outcomes - Item 16 – Vote on Motion to Deny: Commissioner Suzuki moved to deny the rezoning, seconded by Commissioner Bustamante. The vote was: Commissioner Suzuki (yes), Bustamante (yes), Sánchez (no), López (no), Cooper (no), Miller (yes), Walleston (no), Sigo (no), Professor (no), President (no). The motion to deny failed (3–7? The exact tally: 3 yes, 7 no, based on the transcript). - Item 16 – Vote on Motion to Approve: Commissioner Professor moved to approve the rezoning, seconded by Commissioner Miller. The vote was: Professor (yes), Miller (yes), Sánchez (yes), Suzuki (the transcript shows both "sí" and "no" for Suzuki; the final count indicates approval, so Suzuki likely voted yes), López (yes), Cooper (yes), Walleston (yes), Bustamante (no), Sigo (yes), Cherpak (yes). The motion passed, with only Commissioner Bustamante voting against. The rezoning was approved. - The meeting adjourned at 2:43 PM.

The San Antonio Zoning Commission met on July 21, 2026, at 2:00 PM (adjourned at 2:21 PM). Vice Chair Ken Huey chaired the meeting in the absence of Chair John Bustamante. The commission considered a consent agenda of 9 items, two continuances, and two individual zoning cases. All votes were recorded. Consent Calendar - Items 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14 were approved as a consent agenda with a motion by Commissioner Danny Kellum and second by Commissioner George Inohosa. The vote was 11-0. Item 14 (715-723 South Flora Street) was amended by the applicant to add a condition: hours of operation 7:30 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. seven days per week. The commission approved the consent agenda as amended. Continuances - Items 6 and 7 were continued to the August 4, 2026 meeting on a motion by Commissioner Kellum, second by Commissioner Moshgan Pana. The vote was 11-0. No public comment was heard on continuances. Discussion Items Item 10 – 3100 block of South Giefer Street - Request: Change from MF18 and R6 to C3 CD (General Commercial District with conditional use for construction trades contractors, screening required for outdoor storage). - Staff recommendation: Denial, citing incompatibility with the established residential pattern and that the request would extend commercial activity into the interior of a block. - Applicant (Mr. Ramirez): Argued that the site is currently vacant, overgrown, and attracts homeless encampments. He proposed 15 flex-space units (1,300 sq ft each) for contractors, with office and roll-up doors. He stated he spoke with neighbors and received no opposition. He offered to accept conditions: non-alcoholic (NA) overlay, limited hours (7 a.m. to 10 p.m. seven days a week), downward-facing lighting, and no temporary signage. - Commission discussion: Commissioner Inohosa (District 3) noted the lack of registered support or opposition but expressed concern that C3 zoning could later allow more intense uses (e.g., bars, amusement parks). He moved to approve with conditions: NA overlay, hours Monday–Saturday 7 a.m.–8 p.m., Sunday 7 a.m.–6 p.m., downward-facing lighting, and no temporary signage. Commissioner DeVall noted that satellite imagery showed the site is contiguous with existing commercial uses along Gevers Street, reducing the concern of a commercial island. The motion passed 11-0. Item 13 – 245 and 257 West Josephine Street - Request: Change from IDZ3 (uses permitted: C2 commercial, 900 dwelling units, bar/tavern) to C2 CD with conditional use for taxi service, parking and dispatch (no washing or mechanical services). The applicant sought to allow a Tesla robo-taxi charging station (56 spaces) on a portion of a site approved for a mixed-use development that has not been built due to economic conditions. - Staff recommendation: Denial, stating the use is inconsistent with the Midtown Area Regional Center Plan which promotes mixed-use, walkable development. Staff noted the existing IDZ3 zoning already allows a parking lot with charging stations if open to the public; the proposed zoning would make it private. - Applicant (Patrick Christensen): Argued the use is temporary and less intense than the approved 5-story building. He said the site has sufficient power infrastructure and that Tesla cars can be programmed to avoid crossing in front of Hawthorne Elementary School. He noted the property is a paper street (Cosgrove) that will not be developed. - Commission discussion: Commissioner Kellum (District 1) moved for approval, citing the ability to program cars to avoid school traffic and the complementary nature of the use to walkability (fewer private cars). Commissioner Losaf opposed, arguing the area has been zoned for density and walkability, and a parking lot contradicts that vision. Commissioner DeVall supported, noting autonomous taxis could reduce vehicle miles traveled. Commissioner Rodriguez opposed, stating the site is better suited for apartments. Commissioner Inohosa supported but requested Tesla communicate with SAISD (Hawthorne Elementary). The motion passed 8-3 (Commissioners Losaf, Pete Rodriguez, and possibly others? Counting: Kellum yes, Hinosa yes, Losaf no, Rodriguez no, Sipes yes, Kelly yes, Duval aye, Whitsett yes, Pana yes, Chair Huey aye = 8 yes, 2 no? Wait, roll call: Kellum yes, Hinosa yes, Losaf no, Pete Rodriguez no, Sipes yes, Kelly yes, Duval aye, Whitsett yes, Pana yes, Chair Huey aye. That's 9 yes? Actually count: 1 Kellum, 2 Hinosa, 3 Losaf (no), 4 Rodriguez (no), 5 Sipes, 6 Kelly, 7 Duval, 8 Whitsett, 9 Pana, 10 Chair Huey = 8 yes, 2 no. Commissioner Inohosa voted yes but he is District 3? He seconded the motion. So 8-2. The transcript says

The San Antonio Zoning Commission convened on July 21, 2026, at 2:11 PM under Vice President Kenwi (presiding due to the absence of President Jeff Bustamante). The commission considered rezonings, a consent calendar, postponements, and two individual items. The meeting was conducted entirely in Spanish; the following summary is derived from the transcript. Consent Calendar - Approved items 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, and 14 (as amended) by unanimous vote. Item 14 included conditions for hours of operation (7:30 AM to 11 PM) for a conditional use permit to sell alcohol in a private club. Item 2: C3 to C3UC for non-alcoholic beverage sales. Item 3: R4 to IDZ1 for a laundromat. Item 4: AO6 to RM4. Item 5: R6 to RC/CD. Item 8: UDC to MF3. Item 9: I1 to C2. Item 11: O2 to C2. Item 12: MR to C3R. No public comments were received on consent items. Postponements - Items 6 and 7 were postponed to August 4, 2026, with no public comments. The motion to postpone passed unanimously. Discussion Items Item 10: 3100 Block of South Garvest Street – Rezone to C3 with Conditions - Staff planner Samantha Benavides recommended denial, stating the proposal was inconsistent with the surrounding residential pattern and the comprehensive plan. - Applicant Adrian Ramirez (Infinity Properties) proposed a flexible office/storage space for contractors, with 15 units (3,300 sq ft each) and no alcohol sales. He stated he spoke with neighbors and received no opposition, though no written support was submitted. - Commissioners discussed traffic, hours of operation, signage, and the vacant lot's context. Commissioner Hinojosa moved to approve with conditions: non-alcoholic (NA), limited hours (Monday–Saturday 7 AM–8 PM, Sunday 7 AM–6 PM), no temporary signs, and light orientation away from the rear property. Seconded by Commissioner Pana. The motion passed unanimously (10-0). Item 13: 245 & 257 West Josephine Street – Rezone to C2 for Tesla Taxi Charging Station - Staff recommended denial, citing inconsistency with the walkable, transit-oriented development pattern of the area and the comprehensive plan. - Applicant Patrick Christensen proposed a Tesla robotaxi charging station with 56 spaces, an office, and no mechanical services. He stated Tesla vehicles can be programmed to avoid crossing in front of a neighboring school. - Commissioners debated compatibility with the neighborhood, proximity to a school, safety of autonomous vehicles (including battery fire risk), and alignment with the city's walkable vision. Supporters argued the use reduces personal car miles and complements density. Opponents felt the location was inappropriate and that the space should be used for housing or other pedestrian-friendly development. - Motion to approve by Commissioner Kellam, seconded by Commissioner Hinojosa. Vote: 8 in favor, 2 opposed (Commissioners Rodriguez and Lesser? The transcript shows "Losa" as no, but Commissioner Mia Lesser is District 11; likely she voted no. Also Commissioner Rodriguez voted no). The motion passed 8-2. Key Outcomes - Consent calendar (items 2,3,4,5,8,9,11,12,14) approved unanimously with conditions on item 14. - Items 6 and 7 postponed to August 4, 2026. - Item 10 approved with conditions (NA, limited hours, no temporary signs, light orientation). - Item 13 approved (8-2) for a Tesla robotaxi charging station with a taxi service conditional use. - Minutes of the July 7, 2022 meeting were approved by acclamation. - No public comments were made during the meeting.

The Historic Compliance Technical Council (Consejo Técnico de Cumplimiento Histórico), an advisory body appointed by the San Antonio City Council, convened on July 17, 2026, to review certificates of appropriateness for properties in historic districts. The council deliberated on several items including window replacements, driveway modifications, and siding repairs, balancing applicant needs with historic preservation standards. Consent Calendar - Approval of June 2026 Meeting Minutes: The minutes were approved unanimously. - 515 East Houston – Window Replacement: The council unanimously approved the request by John Moniz of LBJR Commercial Properties to replace non-original, severely rotted windows with an identical matching product, as recommended by staff. Public Comments & Testimony - Bianca Maldonado, Monticello Park Neighborhood Association: Appeared on four agenda items as a consistent voice for preservation. - On 463 Ford Drive, she opposed the complete removal of strip driveways, noting that 76% of houses on the block retain them, and advocated for maintaining the strips to the rear property line. - On 200 Donaldson Avenue, she initially supported the staff recommendation but changed her position after clarification, agreeing that the proposed siding repair could be handled administratively. - On 382 (Case 2026-173), she supported the staff recommendation to deny the replacement of wood windows and storm panels with vinyl, citing the architectural significance of the Neifack-designed property. - On 2123 West Magnolia, she supported the staff recommendation to repair rather than replace windows, advising applicants to utilize available historic tax credits and neighborhood resources. - Antonio Petrov (Property Owner, 463 Ford Drive): Described severe drainage issues creating a "mud pit," $25,000 in front foundation repairs ($90,000 total), and tenant mobility needs, arguing that solid concrete between driveway strips was essential for functionality and safety. - Richard González (Applicant, 1914 East Houston): Stated that alley access was determined to be illegal by city traffic engineers, and a previous parking agreement with a nearby church was terminated, leaving no legal parking options and necessitating a 10-foot wide front driveway. - Erico Sánchez (Applicant Representative, 2123 West Magnolia): Explained that two windows were non-functional, and repair quotes ($2,160) were significantly higher than replacement costs ($700), though staff and the neighborhood association recommended repair over replacement. Discussion Items and Key Outcomes 463 Ford Drive (Case 2026-183) – Driveway Modification The council considered a proposal to remove a portion of a historic strip driveway and replace it with solid concrete to address drainage and access issues for a rear accessory dwelling unit. An initial motion to modify the strips while extending them to the rear gate failed on a 3-5 vote. A subsequent motion to approve the staff recommendation also failed. The council then voted unanimously to postpone the case to August 21, 2026, directing the applicant and the Monticello Park Neighborhood Association to negotiate a mutually acceptable design. Dallas Street – Window Replacement The council reviewed a request to replace severely deteriorated windows on a historic duplex. Staff recommended working with the applicant on a case-by-case basis, repairing windows where possible and replacing only those beyond repair. The council unanimously approved the recommendation, denying full replacement and requiring individual assessment. 1914 East Houston – Driveway Installation The council considered a request for a 10-foot wide driveway on a rental property with no alternative legal parking. A motion to grant the request as submitted failed. An alternative motion to support the staff recommendation passed on a 5-4 vote, requiring the applicant to work with staff under their stipulated conditions. 174 Hermann Street This item was postponed to the August 21, 2026 meeting. 200 Donaldson Avenue (Case 2026-157) – Siding Repair The applicant proposed replacing damaged asbestos shingles with fiber cement siding and repairing wood siding on the second floor. Following public testimony and staff clarification, it was confirmed the work could be completed through administrative permits. The applicant withdrew the formal request and agreed to work directly with city staff on the next steps. 382 (Case 2026-173) – Window and Storm Panel Restoration This was a code violation case where wood windows and storm panels had been removed from a property by architect Neifack without proper permits. The council unanimously approved a motion to deny the use of vinyl replacement windows and require the applicant to work with staff to restore and reinstall the original wood elements. 2123 West Magnolia – Window Replacement The council considered a request to replace historic windows with new units due to operational problems. Staff recommended repair. The Monticello Park Neighborhood Association supported restoration. The council unanimously voted to deny the window replacement and require repair, advising the applicant to explore historic rehabilitation tax credits and seek guidance from the neighborhood architectural review committee.