Public Meetings - San Antonio, Texas

The San Antonio Board of Adjustment held a regular meeting on May 18, 2026, at 1:00 PM. Ten commissioners were present, constituting a quorum. The board heard and decided eight cases involving short-term rental density, fence variances, setbacks, lot configurations, and height exceptions. All items were approved with varying vote tallies; one case was postponed to June 1, 2026. Public Comments & Testimony - Diana Schneider (resident adjacent to 310 Valley Alley) expressed support for developing the vacant lot, citing rodent and trash problems, but raised concerns about emergency vehicle access and the proposed rear setback reduction. - Abel Ramirez (neighbor near 3823 Menden Street) opposed the requested side setback variance due to existing parking and safety issues from commercial vehicles in the alley, and expressed broader concern about unpermitted expansions in the neighborhood. - One additional neighbor (name not given) spoke briefly in support of the applicant for 247 Princeton, noting the property owner's efforts to engage the community. Discussion Items - Case BOA 26103079 – 247 Princeton (Short-Term Rental Density Exception) – Applicant Albert Treviño sought a special exception to exceed the 8% short-term rental density cap in the block. The property has no active violations. Staff recommended denial. Applicant testified that he communicated with the Uptown Neighborhood Association and obtained letters of support; he also walked the neighborhood collecting signatures. Commissioners noted the slight density increase (13.03% vs. 12.5%) and neighbor support. A motion to grant was made and seconded. - Case BOA 26103055 – 539 Calumet Place (Fence Height and Clear Vision Variances) – Applicant Chris Choco represented owner Justin Dix. They sought a one-foot exception to allow a 4-foot solid fence (instead of 3 feet) and a 10-foot clear vision area. Staff recommended denial of the height variance but approval of the clear vision variance. Applicant explained the fence replaced a chain-link fence and was built without a permit; he engaged neighbors and received mostly support. Commissioners expressed concerns about the rear alley access for garbage trucks but praised the fence’s appearance. - Case BOA 251030249 – 204 N Zarzamora Street (Setbacks, Landscaping, and Material Variances) – Applicant Carlos Aldava and owner Carlos Jiménez requested a 25-foot rear setback variance (to 5 feet), a 10-foot landscape buffer variance (to 5 feet), and permission to use corrugated metal on an existing unpermitted structure. Staff recommended denial. Applicant noted 21 letters of support, Prospect Hill Neighborhood Association support, and coordination with the Tree Commission. Commissioner Mena moved to grant subject to limiting the structure to 40 feet and requiring a fire-rated assembly. - Case BOA 26-103081 – 626 Fulton Avenue (Multiple Variances for ADU and Addition) – Architect David Focker represented owner Sergio de la Mora. The request included a 4-foot rear setback variance, 2-foot side setback variance, elimination of NC2 design standards, 10-foot roof eave length variance, NC2 material variance for metal accent, and accessory structure side yard variance. Staff recommended denial. Applicant showed compatibility with the eclectic Alta Vista neighborhood and provided support letters from neighbors and the Alta Vista Neighborhood Association after a general meeting. - Case BOA 26-103085 – 310 Valley Alley (Lot Size, Setback, and Access Variances) – Applicant sought variances for lot size (2,100 sq ft vs. 4,000 minimum), lot width (26 ft vs. 35 ft), rear setback (16 ft vs. 20 ft), and front alley access for a single-family home. Staff recommended denial due to emergency access concerns. Applicant argued the lot has been vacant and trash-strewn; development would increase property values. A neighboring property owner (Diana Schneider) supported cleaning up the lot but worried about fire truck access. Commissioner Bragman moved to grant, citing the lot’s unique dimensions and blight reduction. - Case BOA 261030086 – 3823 Menden Street (Side and Rear Setback Variances) – Applicant represented owner Orlando Porras Neira. Requested a side setback of 1 ft 6 in (variance of 3 ft 6 in) and rear setback of 14 ft 9 in (variance of 5 ft 3 in) for an already-completed addition. Staff recommended denial for side setback, approval for rear setback. The addition replaced a deteriorated structure. A neighbor (Abel Ramirez) opposed, citing commercial truck parking and safety issues. An amendment to require a minimum 3-foot side setback was proposed and accepted. - Case BOA 26-103087 – 1599 Purple Sage Road (Third Story Height Variance) – Applicant Cognition Creative LLC requested a half-story height variance to allow a third story (three stories total) instead of the permitted 2.5 stories. Staff recommended approval due to unique topography. Applicant presented neighbor support and argued the third level (small office and terrace) would not intrude on views because of significant elevation differences. Key Outcomes - BOA 26103079 (247 Princeton) – Motion to grant the special exception for short-term rental density passed 9-0-1 (Commissioner Jean abstained). - BOA 26103055 (539 Calumet Place) – Motion to grant the 4-foot solid fence variance (one-foot exception) passed 9-1 (Commissioner Dean opposed). Motion to grant the 10-foot clear vision variance passed 9-1 (Commissioner Dean opposed). - BOA 251030249 (204 N Zarzamora) – Motion to grant the setback, landscaping, and material variances (with conditions: structure limited to 40 ft, fire-rated assembly, metal corrugated material limited to vertical application) passed 10-0. - BOA 26-103081 (626 Fulton Ave) – Motion to grant all six variances (rear setback, side setback, NC2 standards, roof eave length, metal accent material, accessory structure placement) passed 10-0. - BOA 26-103085 (310 Valley Alley) – Motion to grant lot size, lot width, rear setback, and alley access variances passed 10-0. - BOA 261030086 (3823 Menden Street) – Motion to grant side setback (amended to minimum 3 ft separation) and rear setback variances passed 10-0. - BOA 26-103087 (1599 Purple Sage Road) – Motion to grant the half-story height variance to allow a third story passed 10-0. - Item 3 (607 Mackey Bine Street) – Case was postponed to June 1, 2026 at the applicant’s request, with a motion passed by voice vote (all in favor). All decisions are subject to staff follow-up for permit conditions and final plan approvals.

The Board of Adjustments met on May 18, 2026, at 1:00 PM to hear ten cases involving variances and special exceptions. The board, consisting of ten commissioners, granted most requests after deliberation, with one continuance and one item tabled due to applicant absence. Key topics included short-term rental density, fence heights, building setbacks, lot dimensions, and neighborhood conservation district standards. Public Comments & Testimony - Diana Snyder (resident near 310 Del Via Alley): Expressed support for development of a vacant, trash-filled lot but voiced concerns about narrow alley access for emergency vehicles and potential fire risk. - April Ramirez (neighbor of 3823 South Mittman Street): Raised concerns about unpermitted construction, parking of tractor-trailers in the alley behind a meat market, and safety issues related to blocked visibility and fire risk. Discussion Items - Item 1 (BOA-26-1030079) – 247 Princeton: Applicant Elvis Trevino requested a special exception to allow an additional type 2 short-term rental on a block face where density would increase from 6.6% to 13.3% (exceeding the 12.5% limit). Trevino presented support from neighbors and the Uptown Neighborhood Association president. Staff recommended denial. - Item 2 (BOA-26-1030055) – 539 Calumet Place: Applicant Justin Diggs requested a one-foot fence height special exception (4-foot solid front yard fence) and a five-foot driveway clear vision variance (10-foot clear vision area). Staff recommended denial for fence height but approval for clear vision. The applicant explained the fence replaced a chain-link fence and provided neighbor support. - Item 3 (BOA-26-1030??) – 607 Mackelvane Street: Applicant not present; the case was tabled and later continued to June 1, 2026. - Item 4 (BOA-26-1030249) – 214 North Sars of Mora Street: Applicant sought variances for a 5-foot rear setback (from required 30), 5-foot landscape buffer (from 15), and use of corrugated metal fence. The property had an unpermitted metal structure used as a tire shop. Staff recommended denial. The applicant amended the request to include a cap on the corrugated metal, and the motion was approved with a 40-foot length limitation for the structure. - Item 5 (BOA-26-1030081) – 9102 Broxton Drive: Applicant Philip Baltazar requested variances for an accessory structure encroaching into side and rear setbacks. Staff recommended denial for side setback (fire and water runoff concerns) and approval for rear setback. The board granted a continuance to June 15, 2026, to allow the applicant to consult with CPS and neighbors. - Item 6 (BOA-26-1030083) – 234 Myers Boulevard: Applicant Rosalinda Valdez requested a variance to allow 75% impervious cover in the front yard (from 50% maximum) due to an unpermitted concrete driveway. Staff recommended denial. The board granted a 10% variance to allow 60% impervious cover. - Item 7 (BOA-26-1030084) – 262 Fulton Avenue: Applicant David Vogel (architect) requested six variances from NCD2 standards, including reduced setbacks, elimination of 18-inch eave requirement, 45-foot gable length, metal siding accents, and side-yard ADU placement. Staff recommended denial. The applicant presented a redesigned plan with neighborhood association support. The board granted all variances. - Item 8 (BOA-26-1030085) – 310 Del Via Alley: Applicant Zach Duquevis requested variances for lot access via alley, reduced rear setback (16 feet vs. 20), reduced lot size (2,100 sq. ft. vs. 4,000), and reduced lot width (26 ft. vs. 35). Staff recommended denial due to fire access concerns (narrow alley, insufficient hose lay distance). The applicant offered to meet the 20-foot setback. The board granted all variances. - Item 9 (BOA-26-1030086) – 3823 South Mittman Street: Applicant requested variances for a 1-foot 6-inch side setback (from 5) and a 5-foot 3-inch rear setback (from 20). Staff recommended denial for side setback but approval for rear setback. The board amended the motion to require a 3-foot side setback and a 13-foot 3-inch rear setback (accounting for alley credit), then approved. - Item 10 (BOA-26-1030087) – 15919 Purple Sage Road: Applicant Victor Nohosa requested a half-story variance to allow a three-story home (max 2.5 stories) on a lot with significant elevation drop. Staff recommended approval. The board granted the variance as designed. Key Outcomes - Item 1: Motion to grant the special exception passed 9-0-1 (Commissioner Dean abstained). The block face density will be 13.3%. - Item 2 (Fence height): Motion to grant the special exception passed 9-1 (Commissioner Dean opposed). Clear vision variance: Motion to grant passed 9-1 (Commissioner Dean opposed). - Item 3: Continued to June 1, 2026. - Item 4: Motion to grant variances (including 5-foot rear setback, 5-foot landscape buffer behind 40-foot structure, and corrugated metal fence with cap) passed 10-0. - Item 5: Continued to June 15, 2026. - Item 6: Motion to grant a 10% variance (60% impervious cover) passed 10-0. - Item 7: Motion to grant all six variances passed 10-0. - Item 8: Motion to grant all four variances passed 10-0. - Item 9: Motion to grant amended variances (3-foot side setback, 13-foot 3-inch rear setback) passed 10-0. - Item 10: Motion to grant the half-story variance passed 10-0. - Minutes: Approved unanimously. - Director's Report: Staff reported a new SharePoint system for public responses is being finalized. No update on board vacancies; two positions remain open.

The San Antonio City Council convened on Thursday, May 14, 2026, at 9:01 a.m. and adjourned at 11:52 a.m. after an executive session. The meeting opened with roll call (quorum present), an invocation by Pastor Neldo Schmidt of King of Kings Lutheran Church, the Pledge of Allegiance, and approval of the April 29–30, 2026, minutes. Five proclamations were read, recognizing Communities in Schools (40th anniversary), National Salvation Army Week, National Bike Month/Bike to Work Day, Police Officers Memorial Day/National Police Week, and Texas Flood Awareness Week. The consent agenda (items 5–16, minus withdrawn item 13) was approved unanimously after several council members highlighted individual items. No public testimony was delivered despite two individuals signing up. Proclamations & Recognitions - Communities in Schools of San Antonio (40th Anniversary): Mayor Jones read the proclamation. Jessica Weaver (President/CEO) accepted, noting the organization serves 12,000 students annually across 12 school districts and partners with schools and the city to remove barriers to education. Council members praised the program’s impact on student success and workforce development. Councilwoman Mungia mentioned that former councilmembers Roger Garcia and Saldaña credit CIS for their success. - National Salvation Army Week (May 11–17, 2026): The Mayor read the proclamation. A Salvation Army representative stated that in 2025 the San Antonio branch served more than 145,000 meals and provided nearly 50,000 nights of shelter. Council members thanked the organization for its thrift stores, senior center, Angel Tree program, and reentry services. - National Bike Month / Bike to Work Day (May 2026, May 15): Multiple speakers from MPO, the Transportation Department, and Activate SA emphasized the need to move from planning to execution. Statistics: 33 cyclists were killed and 109 seriously injured between 2021 and 2025; one cyclist (Mark Anthony Morales) died in 2026. Councilwoman Corps advocated for quick-build solutions (e.g., plastic delineators) and noted that current bike lanes often have obstructions. Councilwoman Galvan and Councilman Aldrete Gavito called for 15–20 projects per year instead of two. - Police Officers Memorial Day / National Police Week: Chief of Police accepted the proclamation, noting SAPD’s 180-year history and 62 officers killed in the line of duty. The memorial ceremony will be held May 29, 2026, at the SAPD Training Academy. Council members expressed gratitude for officers’ sacrifices and highlighted the importance of officer-community relations. Councilman McKee Rodriguez acknowledged the challenges of policing but praised San Antonio’s difference due to officers’ community roots. - Texas Flood Awareness Week: Chief of SAFD emphasized the “Turn Around, Don’t Drown” message after the June 12, 2024, flooding event. Councilwoman Castillo noted that flood mitigation projects are expensive but critical; she highlighted the work of stormwater staff Jessica and Victoria, and that Infrastructure Director Stephanie Morales is pursuing a master’s in hydrology. Councilman Galvan pointed to Old Grissom and Pin Road flooding issues in District 6. Councilman Spears referenced the Perrin Creek tragedy and two homeless deaths on Salado Creek in September 2024. City Manager’s Report - A video showcased two Development Services Department employees in recognition of Building Safety Month (May 2026): Valerie Gleason (Electrical Inspection Supervisor, 31 years) and Crystal Town (Dangerous Premises Officer, 11 years). The theme was “Built to Last.” Consent Agenda All items on the consent agenda (items 5 through 16, with item 13 withdrawn) were approved by a single vote. Council members highlighted the following: - Item 5 (High-Intensity Drug Trafficking Area Grant): Councilwoman Spears noted the ordinance authorizes application and acceptance of up to $2.1 million from the Office of National Drug Control Policy to combat drug trafficking and related crime. - Items 7 & 8 (Appointments): Councilman Galvan appointed Cynthia Landez to the Streets, Bridges, and Sidewalks Board and Aaron Gonzalez to the Parks and Recreation Board. - Item 10 (SA Ready to Work Advisory Board): Councilwoman Castillo highlighted appointments of Michael Benya (IBEW Local 60 labor representative) and Barbara Acosta (serving high-barrier populations), emphasizing organized labor and justice-involved voices. - Item 15 (Taxpayer Impact Statement): Councilman White said the ordinance requires annual publication of a taxpayer impact statement (including CPS Energy and SAWS rates) in the newspaper to improve transparency and accountability. - Item 3 (Minutes Approval): Minutes from April 29–30, 2026, were approved without edits. Public Comments No members of the public spoke. Two individuals (Monica Guevara and Kathy Jones) had signed up but did not address the council. Executive Session The council met in executive session from 10:36 a.m. to 11:52 a.m. to discuss economic development negotiations (Sec. 551.087), real property transactions (Sec. 551.072), and legal issues including litigation, emergency preparedness, and collective bargaining (Sec. 551.071). No official action was taken in closed session. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 11:52 a.m.

The San Antonio City Council convened on Thursday, May 14, 2026, at 9:01 AM. The meeting opened with roll call (quorum present), an invocation by Pastor Meldo Smith of King's Lutheran Church, and the Pledge of Allegiance. The council then presented five proclamations honoring community organizations and public safety personnel before addressing the consent agenda and other business. The meeting recessed into executive session at 10:26 AM and adjourned at 11:52 AM. Proclamations & Recognitions - 40th Anniversary of Communities in Schools of San Antonio: Jessica Weaver (Board President) accepted the proclamation, thanking the council for supporting students and families through wraparound services. Multiple councilmembers praised the organization's impact on removing educational barriers. - Salvation Army Week: Representatives accepted the proclamation, noting 137 years of service in San Antonio and over 145,000 meals served in 2025. Councilmembers highlighted the organization's disaster response, Angel Tree program, and secondhand stores. - National Bike Day (May 15, 2026): César (Alamo Area MPO), Eric (Transportation Dept), and Paul (bicycle advocate) spoke. They emphasized the need for safe infrastructure, referenced the Vision Zero plan, and remembered a cyclist, Mark Anthony Morales, who died in 2024. Councilmembers supported expanding bike lanes and shared personal experiences. - Police Officer Memorial Week: Chief of Police accepted the proclamation, honoring fallen officers. Councilmembers delivered emotional remarks, thanking officers for their sacrifice, professionalism, and community partnerships. Several named officers from their districts and stressed the importance of providing resources. A moment of silence was observed for fallen officers. - Flood Awareness Week: Staff from the city's flood prevention office accepted the proclamation. Councilmembers discussed the importance of prevention projects, the need for bond funding, and the danger of flash floods, referencing tragedies at Parent Creek and Salado Creek. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes (April 30, 2026): Moved and seconded; passed unanimously. - Remaining Consent Agenda: A motion was made to approve the rest of the consent agenda. Councilmember Mickey Rodriguez pulled Item 15 (appointments to advisory commissions) to thank appointees. Councilmember Galván highlighted Item 10, thanking the economic development board and recognizing new appointees: Michael Peña (IBEW Local 60) and Barbara (providing resources for families). Councilmember Spears spoke on Item 10 regarding drought and drug addiction coordination with police and networks. The consent agenda was then approved as amended. Public Comments & Testimony - Two individuals signed up to speak: Mónica Guevara and Kathy Jones. However, no content of their comments is recorded in the transcript; the meeting moved directly to a motion after their names were called. Discussion Items - Advisory Commission Appointments (Item 15): Councilmember Mickey Rodriguez expressed gratitude to those willing to serve. - Economic Development / Labor & Family Resources (Item 10): Councilmember Galván commended the labor organization, IBEW Local 60, and Barbara for bridging resources. Councilmember Spears noted the impact of drought on addiction and coordination with police and social networks. Key Outcomes - All five proclamations were adopted and presented. - The consent agenda (including minutes from April 30) was approved, with Items 15 and 10 discussed and included. - The council voted to recess into executive session at 10:26 AM to discuss matters under Texas Government Code Sections 551.087 and 551.072. The meeting concluded at 11:52 AM.

The Building Standards Committee of the City of San Antonio convened on Thursday, May 14, 2026, at 9:09 AM. The meeting included an executive session at 9:14 AM, reconvening at 9:27 AM. The committee heard four properties: three recommended for demolition and one for potential repair. All votes resulted in orders consistent with staff recommendations, with one property (1906 Texas Avenue) ordered for repair within 90 days instead of demolition. Consent Calendar - No consent calendar items were presented. Public Comments & Testimony - Joan Rivera (District 2): Spoke regarding 2781 West Jet Road, describing it as an art project and not a danger, noting its rural location and that there are no children nearby. Opposed demolition. - Ross Phillip (District 4, owner of 2781 West Jet Road): Argued the committee lacks legal authority to condemn the property, citing a Texas Supreme Court case. Stated the structure is not a public nuisance and that he renounces city services. Opposed demolition. - Eva Marie Gutiérrez (owner of 1906 Texas Avenue): Testified she has been in contact with Blueprint Ministries, a charity that may perform repairs for low-income homeowners. Presented a waiting list status but could not provide a timeline. Requested opportunity to repair. - Mary Ann Cortés and Elida Carrasco (heirs regarding 128 Hillary Street): Both stated they want nothing to do with the property and support demolition. Discussion Items - Property 1: 2781 West Jet Road (Accessory 1) – Staff recommended demolition. Owner Ross Phillip opposed. Fire Chief Robert Westbrook testified that the structure is extremely hazardous, with active electrical wiring, rust, debris, blocked egress, and proximity to the Medina River. The property was found to be a public nuisance and deemed irreparable. A motion to demolish within 30 days, disconnect utilities, and secure the property passed 5-0. - Property 2: 128 Hillary Street – Staff recommended demolition. Owner Juanita Casias is deceased; multiple heirs were identified but not present. San Antonio Police Officer Dupre testified to over 50 service calls at the property, involving drug activity, trespassing, and proximity to a school (within 1,000 feet). The structure was found to be a public nuisance and irreparable. A motion to demolish within 30 days, vacate, secure, and disconnect utilities passed 5-0. - Property 3: 1906 Texas Avenue – Staff recommended demolition. Owner Eva Marie Gutiérrez attended and presented a plan to repair via Blueprint Ministries, but no firm timeline or financial commitment was provided. The property was found to be a public nuisance but considered potentially repairable. After debate, a motion was passed (5-0) ordering repairs within 90 days, requiring the property to be vacant, secured, and free of debris. Staff were directed to monitor progress. - Property 4: 103 Querida Avenue – Staff recommended demolition. Owner María Vázquez was not present. The structure, including an accessory building, showed extensive damage, vandalism, and unsafe conditions. A motion to demolish within 30 days, secure, and disconnect utilities passed 5-0. Key Outcomes - 2781 West Jet Road: Ordered demolished within 30 days, utilities disconnected, property secured. Vote: 5-0. - 128 Hillary Street: Ordered demolished within 30 days, vacated, secured, utilities disconnected. Vote: 5-0. - 1906 Texas Avenue: Ordered repaired within 90 days, property to remain vacant and secured. Vote: 5-0. - 103 Querida Avenue: Ordered demolished within 30 days, secured, utilities disconnected. Vote: 5-0. - The committee noted a weapon policy update allowing concealed carry in open meetings. - New members Gutiérrez and Leroy were welcomed, appointed on April 9, 2026. - Staff will review agenda drafting to address discrepancies in ordinance citations and manage meeting duration. - The next full board meeting is scheduled for May 28, 2026, at 9:00 AM.

The Building Standards Board of San Antonio convened on Thursday, May 14, 2026, at 9:09 a.m. under Chair Kayla Miranda. A quorum was present. The board addressed four properties, hearing presentations from code enforcement, fire department, police, property owners, and public commenters. The meeting included an executive session (9:14–9:27 a.m.) with no action taken, and adjourned at 12:22 p.m. Consent Calendar - The board approved the minutes of the previous meeting by voice vote (motion by Joel Solis, seconded, all in favor). Public Comments & Testimony - 2781 West Jet Road: Joanne Rivera (District 2) spoke in support of the owner, describing the structure as an art project made from salvaged materials and arguing it is not a conventional building. She noted the property is rural and has no nearby children. - 128 Hillary Street: Officer Robert DuPay (SAPD East Side Safe Unit) testified that the property has been the site of over 50 calls for service for drug activity, burglary, and disturbances. He stated the occupant, Michael, is not the owner and is using the property for narcotics transactions. Mary Ann Cortez and Eliva Carrasco (sisters of the deceased owner) expressed that they want nothing to do with the property and want the nuisance to stop. - 1906 Texas Avenue: Owner Eva Gutierrez stated she is on a waiting list with Blueprint Ministries for roof, electrical, and sheetrock repairs. She said windows have been ordered but cannot be installed until the roof is done. She provided a handwritten scope of work and a document showing her placement on the waiting list. - 103 Garida Avenue: No public comments were made; the owner was not present. Discussion Items - 2781 West Jet Road (Accessory Structure 1): Dangerous Premises Officer Stephanie Sanchez presented a timeline: first inspection January 24, 2025; owner present at a March 6, 2025 conference; reset from February 12, 2026 hearing. The structure is a multi-story metal and wood frame with no safe walking surface, charred poles, rust, oxidation, and active electrical cords. It lies partly in a floodplain and near Medina River. Fire Chief Robert Westbrook and Chief James Bennett testified that the structure is dangerous, with limited access, fuel loads, and no safe way to enter or fight a fire. The Office of Historic Preservation found it not eligible for historic designation. Owner Philip Ross (District 4, attorney) argued the board lacks legal authority to condemn, cited a Texas Supreme Court case, and stated he intends to keep the structure. He did not provide an engineer’s report as previously ordered. The board found the property in violation of multiple subsections of City Code Section 6-156. - 128 Hillary Street (Main Structure): Dangerous Premises Officer Ryan Garza presented: single-story residence built 1940, with roof collapse, rotted foundation, missing siding, exposed wiring, and interior damage. Utilities are disconnected. The property is within 1,000 feet of Democracy Preparatory at Stewart Campus. Attorney Renee Vella (representing Carrington Mortgage Services) requested a 90-day reset to clarify ownership through a pending lawsuit. Board discussion clarified that ownership is in question (deceased owner Juanita Casillas, no will, seven potential heirs). The board determined that the property is a public nuisance and not feasible to repair. - 1906 Texas Avenue (Main Structure): Dangerous Premises Officer Carolyn Palkey presented: single-story residence built 1942, with deteriorated siding, roof holes, exposed plumbing, rotted framing, and soft floors. Two permits exist (foundation repair and residential repair) but are not finalized. Utilities are disconnected. The property is within 1,000 feet of Marin B. Finwick Academy. The owner, Eva Gutierrez, is on a waiting list for assistance. The board debated whether to order repair or demolition. A motion passed to order repair within 90 days, with conditions of securing the property, clearing trash/debris, and keeping it vacated. - 103 Garida Avenue (Main and Accessory Structures): Dangerous Premises Officer Jaime Hassel presented: residence with detached carport, holes, vandalism, vagrant activity, and detached accessory structure. The owner, Maria C. Vasquez, was not present and no contact had been made. The property is near an active railroad but not within 1,000 feet of a school. The board found the structures in violation and not feasible to repair. Key Outcomes - 2781 West Jet Road: Motion (by Fred Andes) declaring the property a public nuisance and ordering demolition within 30 days, utilities cut, and the site cleared and secured. Passed 5-0. (Roll call: Kayla Miranda aye, Joel Solis aye, George Grimes Jr. aye, Jamie Little aye, Fred Andes aye.) - 128 Hillary Street: Motion (by Fred Andes) declaring the property a public nuisance and ordering demolition within 30 days, vacated, utilities cut, and secured. Passed 5-0. (Same roll call.) - 1906 Texas Avenue: Motion (by Fred Andes, seconded by Joel Solis) declaring the property a public nuisance but feasible to repair, ordering repair within 90 days, with the property to remain vacated, secured, and free of trash/debris. A friendly amendment to add “clear” was accepted. Passed 5-0. (Same roll call.) - 103 Garida Avenue: Motion (by Joel Solis, seconded) declaring both main and accessory structures a public nuisance and ordering demolition within 30 days, vacated, utilities disconnected, secured, and free of trash/debris. Passed 5-0. (Same roll call.) - Board Updates: New members David Valtiera (architect) and Jamie Little (mayoral appointee) were welcomed. The full board meeting is scheduled for Thursday, May 28, 2026, at 9:00 a.m.

La Comisión de Zonificación de San Antonio se reunió el 13 de mayo de 2026 para elegir oficiales, designar miembros a comités y considerar varios casos de zonificación. La reunión inició a las 2:19 p. m. y concluyó a las 3:17 p. m. Elección de oficiales y nombramientos - Se eligió a George Peck como presidente. Se nominó a un comisionado (no se identifica claramente) para vicepresidente y a otro para tesorero, aprobados por unanimidad. - Para el Comité de PCT Tax se designaron como miembros primarios a los comisionados Tech Sánchez y Wallersted, y como alternos a Jusu y otro comisionado. - Para representación alterna ante la Comisión de Planificación se nombró al comisionado Sánchez como primario y al comisionado Wallersted como alterno. Consent Calendar - Se aprobaron por voto unánime los puntos del 1 al 5, tal como fueron presentados, tras una moción y segunda. Punto 11 – 3200 block de South Foster Road Público: Una residente se opuso a la rezonificación. Declaró que el lote (1 acre) tiene un negocio de camiones que opera sin cumplir la zonificación, con violaciones como una barda metálica corrugada que no cubre la altura de los vehículos. Solicitó la denegación por incompatibilidad con el vecindario residencial. Discusión: El personal recomendó denegar. Comisionados preguntaron si un C2 podría ser viable para el uso de camiones, pero se señaló que el solicitante pedía un C3CD. Se presentó una moción para denegar, que fue secundada. Votación: 11 a favor, 0 en contra. Se denegó la rezonificación. Punto 12 – 139 New Laredo Highway Se solicitó continuidad al 27 de mayo de 2026. Sin comentarios públicos. Aprobado por unanimidad. Punto 14 – 12139 John Smolsberger Público: Un residente se opuso a cambiar la clasificación de uso a comercial regional para un taller de pintura automotriz, argumentando que es incompatible con el área residencial. El solicitante (representante del propietario) habló a favor, indicando que el negocio de reparación de colisiones ya opera y solo requiere la enmienda para incluir pintura. Señaló que han contactado a vecinos y uno es cliente. Discusión: El personal reportó 19 notificaciones en un radio de 100 pies, con 3 a favor; fuera de los 100 pies, 7 a favor. No hay asociación de vecinos. Se recomendó denegar porque la clasificación propuesta (C3) es más intensa que el comercial comunitario existente y no provee transición adecuada. Comisionados debatieron alternativas (C2 permitiría pintura pero no mecánico; el solicitante quería ambos). Se presentó moción para denegar. Votación: 10 a favor, 1 en contra (comisionado Bustamante). Se denegó. Punto 15 – 2814 Veracruz Street Se solicitó continuidad al 27 de mayo de 2026. Sin comentarios públicos. Aprobado por unanimidad. Punto 16 – 223 TIS Petaluma Se solicitó continuidad al 27 de mayo de 2026. El solicitante presente indicó que no deseaba hablar. Aprobado por unanimidad. Punto 18 – Enmienda de clasificación de densidad residencial baja a comercial comunitario (C1 a C2) para canchas de pickleball Solicitante: Ashley Cormont, en representación del propietario, explicó que la propiedad (5.6 acres) ya alberga una instalación de pickleball y oficinas. Piden C2 para permitir edificios de más de 5,000 pies cuadrados (el C1 limita a 5,000 pies). El uso actual es compatible con C2 y no se permitiría alcohol. Presentaron un plan conceptual con edificios más grandes y una barda de 6 a 8 pies para privacidad. El propietario declaró que es un proyecto personal y espera que dure décadas. Público: No hubo oradores en contra registrados. Una persona se registró para hablar pero no pasó al micrófono. Discusión: El personal recomendó denegar porque C2 permite usos más intensos (ej. tiendas, escuelas, bancos) que podrían ser perjudiciales para el vecindario residencial. Comisionados expresaron preocupación por usos futuros y el impacto de un tanque séptico en el área. Se mencionó que no se pudo contactar a la asociación de vecinos. El solicitante indicó que intentaron comunicarse sin éxito. Algunos comisionados, tras escuchar la presentación, cambiaron su postura inicial de escepticismo a apoyo, destacando que el proyecto es de buena fe. Votación: 10 a favor, 1 en contra (comisionado Bustamante). Se aprobó la enmienda. Key Outcomes - Se eligieron oficiales y se nombraron miembros para comités. - Se aprobó la agenda de consentimiento. - Punto 11: denegado. - Punto 12: continuado al 27 de mayo de 2026. - Punto 14: denegado. - Punto 15: continuado al 27 de mayo de 2026. - Punto 16: continuado al 27 de mayo de 2026. - Punto 18: aprobado (cambio de clasificación de C1 a C2). - Se reconoció al miembro saliente Gómez por su servicio en la comisión de zonificación.

Introductory paragraph: The San Antonio City Council held a Session B meeting on Wednesday, May 13, 2026, at approximately 5:00 PM CDT. The council had a quorum present. The meeting focused on two major topics: the proposed process for the 2027 bond program and an update on the Homelessness Strategic Framework. Discussion Items 2027 Bond Program Process Director Mike Shannon and staff presented an update on the 2022 bond program (60% of 180 approved projects completed; 59 complete, 64 under construction, 63 in design) and outlined the proposed timeline for the next bond. Two election options were presented: May 2027 or November 2027. A key point was that the bond amount and tax rate impact would be presented in August 2026 after the property tax certification. The presentation included discussion of a housing bond component, leveraging the San Antonio Housing Trust (each city dollar leverages seven dollars from other sources). Council members expressed various positions: - Councilor White stated support for a $625 million bond with no tax increase and favored the May 2027 election. - Councilor Gavito opposed a Spurs bond and supported the November timeline. - Councilor Mesa González emphasized the need for demographic data to prioritize spending and called for a cost-benefit analysis of maintenance vs. new projects. - Councilor Mungía highlighted the importance of rental assistance and support for young adults aging out of foster care. - Councilor Villagran requested disaggregated data on homelessness to better target resources. - Several councilors stressed transparent community engagement and clear prioritization of projects. Homelessness Strategic Framework Mark Carmona, Director of Housing and Homelessness Services, presented the framework based on three pillars: preventing homelessness, getting people off the streets, and keeping them housed. Key statistics: In 2025, 1,738 individuals experienced homelessness for the first time; over 4,100 were homeless; 2,500 were housed; leaving a gap of 1,322. Additionally, 609 people accessed shelters in 2025 but returned to homelessness. The city invested a total of $30.5 million in the homeless response system in FY2026, including $4 million for prevention and $19.8 million for shelter and services, with additional indirect costs from police and solid waste services not included in that figure. The presentation highlighted the need for 550 additional shelter beds, low-barrier shelters, and a "commissioning" approach to encampments (modeled after Houston) to redirect resources from cleanup to housing and services. Council members offered feedback: - Councilor Villagran and others requested disaggregated data by gender, veteran status, youth, and substance use. - Councilor White asked for a definition of success: reducing homelessness to the lowest possible population and quickly re-housing those who lose housing. - Councilor Mesa González emphasized the role of non-profit partners and the need for cost-benefit analysis of prevention vs. shelter. - Councilor Gavito stressed engaging residents and leveraging faith-based organizations for long-term partnerships. - Councilor Mungía raised concerns about low-barrier shelters and substance use, and called for rental assistance profiles to target the most vulnerable. - Councilor Cor requested better communication with police and community, and data on encampment cleanup costs to demonstrate inefficiency of current approach. - Councilor Castillo Angiano noted the lack of progress on a previous request for a cost-benefit analysis of the homeless response system, and asked that it be presented in a future Session B. Key Outcomes - No formal votes were taken during the session. - The council directed staff to proceed with community engagement over the summer to identify potential bond projects and gather feedback. - Staff will return in August 2026 with a detailed bond proposal including tax rate scenarios and the recommended election date. - For the Homelessness Framework, staff will refine data, provide demographic breakdowns, develop cost-benefit analysis, and present a finalized strategic plan in conjunction with the FY2027 budget discussions in August. - Council members expressed strong support for a housing bond component and for a low-barrier shelter approach, though some raised concerns about operational details.

This combined B session covered two major presentations: first, an update on the proposed process for the 2027 municipal bond program, including guiding principles, potential election timeline, and debt management strategies; second, a briefing on the long-term shelter and housing framework for the homeless response system, outlining gaps in prevention, shelter, and permanent housing. Councilmembers provided extensive feedback on bond categories, variable tax rates, district-specific propositions, housing bond priorities, and the need for coordinated homeless services. Consent Calendar - No consent calendar items were discussed. Public Comments & Testimony - No public testimony was taken during this session; 15 individuals were signed up for public comment after the presentations, but the meeting adjourned at 5:32 p.m. before they could speak. Discussion Items: 2027 Bond Program Process - Presentation by Mike Shannon (Capital Delivery Director), Veronica (Housing), Troy (CFO), and Eric (Interim City Manager): The team outlined a proposed process for the 2027 bond program, noting that the 2022 bond is 66% complete (59 completed, 64 under construction, 63 in design). Guiding principles include plan alignment, public health/safety, resiliency, economic viability, and council input. Two timeline options were presented: a May 2027 election or a November 2027 election. The bond capacity remains uncertain due to declining property values; a fixed 21-cent debt service tax rate would produce a smaller bond program, while a variable rate could allow for a larger bond but might require tax-rate increases. - Councilmember McKee Rodriguez expressed support for the proposed categories but advocated for a separate proposition for downtown/entertainment district infrastructure, arguing it merits its own discussion. He also requested an analysis of the return on investment for economic development projects and a clearer understanding of the capacity of the San Antonio Housing Trust. He supported a May 2027 election to avoid cost escalation. - Councilmember Mungia supported maintaining the 2022 bond committee structure and advocated for a housing bond at the same or greater level. He suggested expanding the definition of permanent supportive housing and focusing on deeply affordable housing. He also supported a separate downtown proposition and requested more transparency on how district-specific propositions would be structured. - Councilmember White strongly opposed any variable tax rate, calling it a tax increase on citizens. He supported a fixed rate and a $625 million bond cap, stating “we need to live within our means.” He supported a May 2027 election but opposed district-specific propositions. - Councilmember Villagran emphasized making every taxpayer dollar go further. She requested breakdowns of homelessness data by gender, foster youth, veterans, and mental health issues. She raised concerns that a separate downtown proposition could lead to many sub-propositions (up to 10) and urged keeping the bond at $1.2 billion. She supported a May 2027 election and formalizing the tri-chair approval process for bond committees. - Councilmember Mesa Gonzalez supported a May 2027 bond and the bond committee structure. She asked for data on home rehab applications by district and waitlists. She expressed concern that a smaller bond capacity would defer critical infrastructure needs. She was open to a downtown proposition but wanted clarity on which projects would be included. - Councilmember Castillo supported replicating the 2022 bond committee process, urged using an equity lens in project analysis, and advocated for a May 2027 election. She supported a separate downtown proposition and requested that public arts funding continue (1.5% of each proposition). - Councilmember Spears emphasized listening to residents and raised concerns about project necessity vs. desirability. She opposed a variable tax rate and district-specific propositions, citing unintended consequences in other cities. She requested dollar-and-cents examples of potential tax impacts. - Councilmember White (continued) and Councilmember Galván both emphasized careful scrutiny of long-term operating costs for new facilities. Galván requested a comparison of revolving loan fund models for the housing trust. - Councilmember Aldrete-Gavito supported current categories but opposed a separate downtown proposition. She stressed that now is not the time for tax or rate increases and supported tri-chair approval by council majority. - Mayor Jones supported a November 2027 election to maximize public participation, noting the May 2022 turnout was only 8%. She requested an analysis of how 2017 bond projects were classified as citywide vs. regional and asked for a clearer understanding of the sports/entertainment district’s scope. She emphasized leveraging private and philanthropic dollars and wanted to understand the gap in deeply affordable housing (30% AMI) to guide housing bond investments. Discussion Items: Shelter & Housing Framework (Homeless Response) - Presentation by Mark Carmona (Chief Housing Officer/Director of Homeless Services and Strategy): The framework identifies three focus areas: preventing homelessness, guiding people off the streets, and keeping people in housing. Current system capacity serves 5,991 households annually. Key gaps include 550 emergency shelter beds, 728 units of interim housing, 283 additional vouchers, and 464 permanent supportive housing units. The city’s FY26 investment is $30.5 million (not including $23 million in indirect police/fire costs). Strategies include encampment decommissioning, outreach restructuring, a day work program, and leveraging bond programs. - Councilmember McKee Rodriguez requested that the CCR calling for a day labor program, increased low-barrier shelter, and a cost-benefit analysis of homeless strategies be heard before budget discussions. He advocated for encampment decommissioning over routine sweeps, arguing the latter erode trust and waste money. - Councilmember Aldrete-Gavito expressed confidence in the plan and stressed the importance of including foster youth and leveraging the faith community. She noted that resident gratitude for cleanups must be balanced with the need for long-term solutions. - Councilmember Villagran requested demographic breakdowns of homeless populations (men, women, veterans, foster youth, etc.). She called for regulating hotels that function as de facto low-barrier shelters and advocated for permanent supportive housing as a key solution. - Councilmember White asked for success metrics and wanted to know how many unsheltered individuals declined services vs. being turned away due to capacity. He supported encampment cleanups but raised concerns about no-barrier shelters where services are optional, arguing the public expects accountability. - Councilmember Galván stressed the need for expanded low-barrier/no-barrier shelter and trauma-informed care. He asked about creating neighborhood-based service hubs and improving coordination of outreach workers. - Councilmember Mesa Gonzalez requested a breakdown of the $19.8 million in homeless spending by partner and by function (e.g., day center, street outreach). She emphasized the cost-effectiveness of upstream prevention over shelter and rehousing. - Councilmember Mungia reminded that requiring conditions for housing after getting people off the street is counterproductive. He asked for rental assistance profiles and highlighted the need for better communication with residents about outreach efforts. - Councilmember Spears requested identification of “leaders in each lane” of homeless interventions and expressed concern about mixing populations (e.g., domestic violence victims with substance users) in low-barrier shelters. She advocated for targeted approaches for seniors and foster youth. - Councilmember Castillo supported the framework and highlighted the importance of reentry programs for justice-involved individuals. She urged prioritizing mental health services, especially in light of Laurel Ridge’s closure. - Councilmember Cory asked for investment metrics for each homeless program (e.g., day center vs. street outreach) and requested better stakeholder engagement between outreach teams and businesses/residents. She advocated for geolocation data in HMIS and more dedicated low-barrier housing options. - Mayor Jones asked for planning assumptions for the unhoused population through 2032 to inform bond deliberations. She requested targeted approaches for veterans, foster youth, and seniors, and emphasized the need for a public information campaign about the 30-day hotel tax exemption. She also asked about ensuring public-financed housing is not among the highest evictors. Key Outcomes & Next Steps - Bond Program: Staff will incorporate council feedback and return in August with the certified tax roll, providing specific bond capacity options (fixed vs. variable rate) and examples of potential tax impacts. Further work sessions with the community and bond committees will occur summer 2026. Council direction on election timeline (May vs. November 2027) and proposition structure (including whether to create a separate downtown district proposition) will be refined. - Homeless Framework: Mark Carmona will facilitate external stakeholder work sessions over the summer and return in August with a final framework plan as part of the FY27 budget presentation. Staff will provide requested demographic breakdowns, investment metrics by program, and more detailed gap analysis. The next steps also include developing a five-year strategy with measurable objectives and key results. - No formal votes were taken; the session was a briefing and discussion for council feedback. Other Items - Councilmember McKee Rodriguez requested support for a new D2 Senior Center at Copernicus Park, to be funded through an extension of the Inner City TIRZ through 2050, which would avoid competing for bond dollars.