Public Meetings - San Antonio, Texas

The Public Safety Committee convened on March 17, 2026, at 2:34 PM and adjourned at 3:46 PM. The meeting covered fire department performance metrics, an update on the violent crime reduction plan, and an Animal Care Services (ACS) report. Due to a hard quorum cutoff, the fifth agenda item was not reached. Consent Calendar - The minutes from the previous meeting were approved by a vote of 3-0-1 (three in favor, zero opposed, one abstention). Discussion Items - Fire Department Performance Metrics: Chief Frasto presented operational statistics. In FY2024, SAFD responded to 247,070 incidents; in FY2025, that increased by 2.5% to 253,322 incidents. Emergency medical responses accounted for 78% of total incidents. Through February 2026, the department had already responded to over 102,000 incidents. Districts 1, 2, and 5 had the highest call volumes. The busiest fire stations were 32, 35, 29, 37, and 44. The department responded to just under 1,200 structure fires in FY2025, mostly in single-family homes. The Mobile Integrated Healthcare (MIH) program made over 8,000 contacts through February 2026, and the Fire Prevention Division conducted nearly 24,000 inspections. Council members requested additional data: district-level breakdowns of call types, trends since 2019, response time benchmarks, cause of structural fires (including vacancy status), and analysis of program investments. The Fire Needs Assessment consultant is expected to be hired by end of March, with council approval in April/May. - Violent Crime Reduction Plan Update: Dr. Smith of UTSA presented the third annual evaluation of the San Antonio Violent Crime Reduction Plan. The plan has three strategies: hot spots policing, problem-oriented place-based policing, and focused deterrence (Phase 3 not yet started). Over the life of the plan (three years), violent street crime (murder, robbery, aggravated assault) decreased by approximately 9.5–10%. In 2025 alone, violent street crime dropped 21% compared to 2024, with murder down 18%, robbery 17%, aggravated assault 20%, and deadly conduct 32%. Reductions occurred in all police substations. In the 30–35 hot spot grids treated every 60 days, violent crime fell 63.2%. Offender-focused treatment areas saw an 83% reduction, and high-visibility treatment areas saw a 52% reduction. A differences-in-differences analysis showed a 44% reduction in treated grids relative to untreated controls. The treatment effect persisted for about one month after police resources moved. Phase 3 (focused deterrence) will target repeat violent offenders with a “carrot and stick” approach, partnering with a nonprofit for social services (e.g., trauma counseling, substance abuse treatment, job training, housing). The RFP for the nonprofit partner closed in January; scoring is underway, with council recommendations on May 7 and contracts starting June 1. Phase 3 is expected to begin in Q4 2026. Council members discussed the balance between enforcement and addressing root causes, funding for Phase 3, and the need to expand Phase 2 to more properties. Dr. Smith noted that hotspot policing is a short-term “fever reducer” and must be complemented by longer-term strategies. - Animal Care Services Update: John presented ACS performance data. The department receives about 90,000 calls annually, with approximately 60% classified as critical calls. The critical call response rate is just under 95%. The dangerous dog compliance rate goal is 80%; the department achieved 82% last year but recently dropped to 74.8% due to vacancies. Two vacancies have been filled, and cross-training has boosted compliance back toward 80%. Cruelty cases are on pace to double in FY2026. The definition of severe bite was refined in December 2024, making comparisons not apples-to-apples. ACS has 245 total positions, with 69 for response. Currently there are four vacancies. The next academy starts April 7, adding seven first-response cadets, two dangerous dog officers, and one cruelty investigator. Municipal court data showed over 12,000 filings in FY2025, with the majority filed criminally. The judge explained the process for dismissals and that fines consider ability to pay. Councilmember Castillo emphasized the need for continued investment in ACS and community engagement. Key Outcomes - The committee approved the previous meeting minutes (3-0-1). - The Fire Department will provide district-level data breakdowns, trend analysis, response time benchmarks, and structural fire cause data at the next meeting. - The Violent Crime Reduction Plan Phase 3 timeline was outlined: nonprofit partner selection by May 7, contracts by June 1, implementation expected in Q4 2026. Staff will explore expanding Phase 2 to more properties and report back. - The ACS academy is scheduled for April 7, filling vacant positions in first response, dangerous dog, and cruelty investigations. - The fifth agenda item was not reached due to loss of quorum at 3:45 PM.

The San Antonio Code Enforcement Board convened on March 12, 2026, at 9:05 AM (recessed for executive session from 10:10 to 10:29 AM) and adjourned at 11:15 AM. The board considered five properties for dangerous structure declarations, hearing testimony from code enforcement officers, police, property representatives, and members of the public. Votes were taken on each item, with varying outcomes. Consent Calendar - Minutes of previous meeting: Approved unanimously (5-0) with no discussion. Public Comments & Testimony - 115 Al Sub Street: Police Officer Anthony Peña testified that the property was a site of narcotics activity and weapons disturbances, leading to six arrests and removal of a child by CPS in November 2025. He noted the main occupant collected rent from multiple people despite no water or electricity. - 172 North San Felipe Avenue: Richard González (grandson) stated he is a general contractor with power of attorney, admitted to dumping debris on the property, and requested 90–120 days to demolish and rebuild. Rosalinda González (daughter) and Angélica González (sister) argued the property should be demolished by the city, citing family disputes and no legal ownership due to the lack of a will. - 212 GoFord Drive: Lisa Bustos (granddaughter and prospective owner) requested 90–120 days to repair the main structure and demolish the accessory, stating she has financial means and a contractor. She acknowledged no will exists and that legal transfer of ownership is pending. - 839 Potomac: María Navarro (bank representative) requested 60 days to determine whether to rehabilitate or demolish, noting the property was acquired in October 2025 and that she had recommended securing it. - 4238 Nogales Street: Silvia Soto (Bear County resident and homeowners association member) expressed concern about vacant properties attracting drug activity and vagrancy, urging the board to address the problem. Discussion Items - 115 Al Sub Street: Code Enforcement Officer Crystal Town presented evidence of severe structural decay, no utilities, exposed wiring, garbage, and squatters. The property is within 1,000 feet of Roosevelt Elementary and Vasco Middle School. The board found the structure a public nuisance and voted to demolish. - 172 North San Felipe Avenue: Code Enforcement Officer Jerry Cohen detailed extensive damage to the main and accessory structures, including missing roof tiles, rotted floors, and deteriorated walls. Both the owner and family members agreed demolition was needed. The board voted to demolish. - 212 GoFord Drive: Code Enforcement Officer John Garlock recommended repairing the two-story brick main structure and demolishing the 400-square-foot wooden accessory. Lisa Bustos acknowledged the situation and requested time. After an executive session (10:10–10:29 AM) to discuss legal matters, the board voted to allow repair of the main structure and demolition of the accessory, with the owner to provide a scope of work, financial documentation, and timeline to staff. - 839 Potomac: Code Enforcement Officer Cynthia Santana reported the structure has been vacant for at least four years, with no utilities. The bank representative stated rehabilitation would be too expensive. The board voted to demolish. - 4238 Nogales Street: Code Enforcement Officer Jaime Jasso documented significant structural failure, evidence of vagrants, and exposure to the elements. The property had been cleaned three times but remained unsafe. The board voted to demolish. Key Outcomes - 115 Al Sub Street (5-0): Declared a public nuisance not feasible for repair; ordered demolition within 30 days, property to be vacated, secured, and all utility services disconnected. - 172 North San Felipe Avenue (5-0): Declared a public nuisance not feasible for repair; ordered demolition of both main and accessory structures within 30 days, property to be vacated, secured, and cleaned of debris. - 212 GoFord Drive (4-1; Dwayne Nelson dissenting): The main structure was deemed repairable; ordered repair with a timeline to be set by staff, requiring a scope of work, financial statement, and timeline. The accessory structure was declared a public nuisance and ordered demolished within 30 days. The property must be secured and utilities disconnected. - 839 Potomac (5-0): Declared a public nuisance not feasible for repair; ordered demolition within 30 days, property to be vacated, secured, and cleaned. - 4238 Nogales Street (5-0): Declared a public nuisance not feasible for repair; ordered demolition within 30 days, property to be vacated and secured. - Administrative Items: The board noted upcoming meetings (May 21–28) and a call for applicants to fill a vacant position for the board through March 23, 2026.

The Building Standards Board (BSB) met on March 12, 2026, at 9:05 AM to hear five cases involving dangerous and dilapidated structures. The board issued demolition orders for four properties and reset one case to allow the owner's representative time to submit required documents. The meeting concluded with administrative updates regarding future meeting dates and board vacancies. Consent Calendar - The minutes from the previous meeting were approved unanimously (5-0). Discussion Items and Key Outcomes 115 Allsop Street – Demolition Ordered - The property was recommended for demolition by staff. It had no water or electricity, occupants were illegally staying inside, and the structure had extensive rot, exposed subfloor, and unsafe conditions. - San Antonio Police Officer Pena reported six arrests during a DART warrant execution (November 14, 2025), including narcotics possession, a child found in unsafe conditions (CPS was called and children removed), and ongoing criminal activity at the property (gun disturbance, cutting, shots-fired calls). - The owner (Campos Secundino) was not present. - Motion by Fred Andes to declare the property a public nuisance (violations of Chapter 6, Article 8, Section 156, subsections 1, 2, 7, 8, 11, 12, 15, 17, and 18) and order demolition within 30 days, vacate, secure, cut utilities, and remove trash and debris. Passed 5-0. 172 North San Felipe Avenue – Demolition Ordered - Staff recommended demolition for the main and accessory structures. The property had no utilities, exposed rafters, missing roof decking, and was open to the elements. - Two family members (Richard Gonzalez – grandson and alleged heir, and Salinda Gonzalez – daughter) appeared. Both agreed the property should be demolished, but neither could demonstrate clear title or ownership. - Richard Gonzalez stated he had a will but had not yet probated it. Salinda Gonzalez reported illegal dumping and fires set by Richard. Neither party had a scope of work, timeline, or financial proof. - Motion by Fred Andes to declare both structures a public nuisance (violations for main: subsections 1, 2, 7, 11, 12, 15, 17, 18; accessory: 1, 7, 11, 12, 15, 17, 18) and order demolition within 30 days, vacate, secure, free of trash and debris, and disconnect utilities. Passed 5-0. 212 Go Forth Drive – Main Structure Reset for Repair; Accessory Demolished - Staff recommended repair for the main structure and demolition for the accessory structure. - Lisa Bustos, granddaughter of the deceased owners, appeared. She stated she is working with family to obtain ownership but has no clear title. She provided verbal cost estimates ($7,000–$12,000 for accessory demolition; $15,000–$30,000 for main repairs) but no written scope of work, timeline, or proof of financial ability. - An executive session was held (10:10 AM – 10:29 AM) to consult with legal counsel regarding title issues. - Motion by Fred Andes to: (1) Find the main structure feasible to repair (violations subsections 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 15, 17, 18) and reset the case to allow time to provide a scope of work, timeline, and financial proof; utilities to be cut and property secured. (2) Declare the accessory a public nuisance (violations subsections 1, 2, 8, 11, 12, 15, 17) and order demolition within 30 days. - Passed 4-1 (Dwayne Nelson voted nay). 839 Potomac – Demolition Ordered - Staff recommended demolition. The property had missing siding, exposed wood studs, a sill beam supported by buckets filled with concrete, missing doors, and vagrant activity. It is within 1,000 feet of Washington Elementary School. - Maria Navarro, representing the bank (Kiavi) that foreclosed on the property, said the bank would consider repair or demolition but had not yet made a decision. She requested 60 days. She admitted the property had no fence (despite previous boarding) and that a previous minor repair permit had expired. - Motion by Dwayne Nelson to declare the property a public nuisance (violations subsections 1, 2, 8, 11, 12, 15, 17, and 18) and order demolition within 30 days, vacate, secure, free of trash and debris, and disconnect utilities. Passed 5-0. 4238 Nogalita Street – Demolition Ordered - Staff recommended demolition. The structure had sunk into grade, the rear addition was separating, interior had holes exposing grade, water damage, and vagrant evidence. Located within 1,000 feet of two schools. No owner or interested party appeared. - Sylvia Soto (Los Arenas Homeowners Association) spoke in support of action, noting concerns about safety and vacant properties in the community. - Motion by Dwayne Nelson to declare the property a public nuisance (violations subsections 1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 15, 17, and 18) and order demolition within 30 days, vacate, cut utilities, and secure. Passed 5-0. Administrative Updates - Next BSB meeting rescheduled from May 21, 2026 to May 28, 2026. - Financial Disclosure Report (FDR) due April 1, 2026. - Advertisement for a vacant board position runs through March 18, 2026. - Two reappointment memos received (Doris Oleese – District 6; George Grimes Jr. – District 2) pending City Council agenda placement. - Planning and Community Development Committee (PCDC) tentatively scheduled for March 30, 2026.

The San Antonio Planning Commission convened on March 11, 2026, with all commissioners present. The meeting covered a consent agenda and three individual items, including a controversial request to rezone land near Camp Stanley from agricultural to light industrial. Following public opposition, the commission voted to continue the item to April 8 for further discussion with the community. Two other items were also continued to allow for neighborhood outreach. Consent Calendar - The consent agenda, consisting of routine items read in a single motion, was approved unanimously by all commissioners present (Commissioner Orion left briefly but returned). Public Comments & Testimony - Item 12 (ETJ amendment at Ralph Fair Road): Multiple residents opposed the change from agricultural to light industrial for a 5.6-acre property. Callers and in-person speakers cited concerns about: - Loss of natural habitat, mature trees, and wildlife (deer, owls, foxes). - Increased noise, light pollution, and heavy truck traffic incompatible with the residential area. - Potential environmental impacts, including stormwater runoff and threats to well water quality. - One speaker, Steve Olsen (adjacent property owner, 18-year resident), described damage to his fence and sedimentation issues from nearby construction and asked for a stormwater management study. - Item 13 (3730 Baychall Rose rezoning): Wendelin Venderfo, a resident of Paloma subdivision, opposed the change from low-density commercial to C-2 commercial, citing existing traffic, flooding, homeless activity, and a promise of green space. She requested a postponement to study impacts. - Item 14 (5334 San Pedro Ave postponement): Betty Ecker, on behalf of a neighborhood society, requested a two-week delay to hold better-informed meetings with the six affected neighborhoods. Discussion Items - Item 12 – Snatcher Steel (barbed wire manufacturing) request to amend ETJ land use category from Agricultural to Light Industrial: - The property is 5.6 acres near Ralph Fair Road and Camp Stanley (Joint Base San Antonio). 56 notices sent, 0 in favor, 2 against. - Staff recommended denial due to incompatibility with existing residential neighborhoods and lack of use limitations. - The applicant (Reid Schneider) argued the site is within Camp Stanley’s protection area, that operations would be indoor (cutting/bending rebar, no heat or fire), and that they would preserve trees and use downward lighting to avoid interfering with night training. They plan 3 truck trips per day and 16 employees, with operations ending by 5 PM. - Commissioners expressed concerns about lack of homeowner association outreach, absence of tree preservation or stormwater plans, and the need for coordination with JBSA regarding communications and lighting. - A motion was made to continue the case to the April 8 meeting to allow the applicant to meet with the neighborhood and address compatibility concerns. The motion passed unanimously. - Item 13 – Amendment at 3730 Baychall Rose (community commercial): - The petitioner was not present; the applicant was called. The resident, Wendelin Venderfo, spoke in opposition and requested a two-week postponement to allow for further study. The commission voted to continue to March 25. - Item 14 – Request for postponement at 5334 San Pedro Ave: - The applicant (likely the neighborhood) requested a two-week delay to hold more discussions with neighboring associations. The commission granted the postponement to March 25. Key Outcomes - Consent Agenda: Approved unanimously. - Item 12 (Ralph Fair Road / Snatcher Steel): Continued to the April 8, 2026 meeting by a unanimous vote (8-0) to allow for community dialogue and additional planning. - Item 13 (3730 Baychall Rose): Continued to March 25, 2026 meeting to enable further environmental and traffic impact review. - Item 14 (5334 San Pedro Ave): Continued to March 25, 2026 meeting to permit neighborhood outreach. - No director’s report was given. The meeting adjourned at 2:54 PM.

The San Antonio Planning Commission met on March 11, 2026, at 2:02 PM. Commissioners Sanchez, Garcia, De Succi, Lopez, Ulett, Mylam, Orion, Bustamante, and Prophet were present, establishing a quorum. The meeting addressed two agendas: a combined consent agenda followed by three items under individual consideration. Key actions included continuances for two of the three contested items. Consent Calendar - The combined consent agenda was approved unanimously by the Commission (9-0). Public Comments & Testimony - Item 12 – Camp Bullis ETJ Military Protection Area Land Use Plan Amendment: Eight community members submitted voicemails or spoke in opposition to changing the land use from Agricultural to Light Industrial for 6.19 acres at Ralph Fair Road. Residents expressed concerns about loss of natural habitat (wildlife including owls, deer, and foxes), mature oak trees, privacy, noise, light pollution, truck traffic, and potential reductions in property values. One resident, Steve Huddleston (26109 Ralph Fair Road), noted he would be most impacted and raised issues of groundwater protection (he is on well water), stormwater runoff, and visual impact. - Item 13 – IH 10 East Corridor Plan Amendment: Gwendolyn Vanderpool (3015 Sellhurst Street) spoke regarding the proposed change from Regional Commercial and Low Density Residential to Community Commercial at 3730 White Child Road. She raised concerns about drainage and flooding, dark skies (existing 24/7 gas station nearby), increased traffic, homeless encampments, and the developer not fulfilling a promise that the area would remain a green belt. - Item 14 – 5334 San Pedro Avenue: Billy Acker from the almost Cherus Neighborhood Association spoke in favor of a continuance to allow further discussion among affected neighborhoods. Discussion Items - Item 12 (Continued to April 8, 2026): Applicant Newty Dean Kalam (Killing Griffin and Fairman) and Reed Schneider (business owner, 1327 Gimbal Road) presented a request to amend the Camp Bullis ETJ Military Protection Area Land Use Plan from Agricultural to Light Industrial for a steel rebar fabrication facility (not manufacturing; cutting and bending only). The site is 6.19 acres, and the applicant stated that all operations would be indoors, with 3 truck deliveries per day and 16 employees, operating only until 5 PM. The applicant had engaged with JBSA, which issued a letter of no objection. Planning staff noted the tree ordinance and Military Lighting Overlay District (MLOD) would apply. Commissioners expressed concern about the lack of communication with the Lost Creek neighborhood association (not registered with the city) and requested dialogue. Commissioner De Succi recommended continuing to April 8 to facilitate community engagement. The motion to continue passed unanimously (9-0). - Item 14 (Continued to March 25, 2026): A request for a two-week continuance to allow further discussions with the neighborhood association was approved unanimously (9-0). - Item 13 (Continued to March 25, 2026): The applicant was not present. Commissioner Ulett noted that public comments raised issues that the applicant could not address. The meeting continued the item to March 25, 2026, unanimously (9-0) to allow the applicant to respond. Key Outcomes - Consent agenda approved unanimously. - Item 12 (Camp Bullis ETJ plan amendment) continued to April 8, 2026, to allow applicant to engage with the Lost Creek neighborhood association and address community concerns. - Item 14 (5334 San Pedro Avenue) continued to March 25, 2026, at the applicant's request. - Item 13 (IH 10 East Corridor Plan) continued to March 25, 2026, due to the applicant's absence.

The coordinating committee meeting was called to order at 3:00 PM with a quorum present. No public comments were received. The committee discussed and unanimously approved three applications for enrollment in the San Antonio Conservation Plan (SCP) Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) and approved the minutes from the February 24, 2026 meeting. The meeting adjourned at 3:09 PM. Discussion Items - Item 1: WTG Bear Transmission (79.94 acres) – Located in western Bexar County and a small portion of eastern Medina County. Staff recommended approval. The project area includes zero acres of golden-cheeked warbler (GCW) habitat and requires zero GCW conservation credits. Mitigation fees: $41,500 for CAR Zone 1 & 2, $37,810 for CAR Zone 3 & 4, plus a plan administration fee of $7,931, and a $2,500 application fee, for a total of $87,241. Motion to approve passed unanimously. - Item 2: PEDCOR Investments (15.38 acres) – Located off Alamo Ranch Parkway within the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ). Staff recommended approval. The project area is entirely in CAR Zone 1, with zero GCW habitat and zero credits required. Total mitigation fee: $16,918 (including $2,500 application fee). Motion to approve passed unanimously. - Item 3: San Antonio Water System (13.4 acres) – Located from Tally Road approximately three miles southward to Stevens Ranch, within the ETJ. Staff recommended approval. The project area includes 3.80 acres in CAR Zone 1, 1.55 acres in CAR Zone 2, and 8.05 acres in CAR Zone 3B, with zero GCW habitat. Total mitigation fee: $14,740 (including $2,500 application fee). Motion to approve passed unanimously. - Approval of Minutes (February 24, 2026) – No corrections were offered. Motion to approve passed unanimously. Key Outcomes - All three SCP HCP enrollment applications were approved unanimously by the committee (all members present voting in favor). - The approved mitigation fees are: $87,241 (WTG Bear Transmission), $16,918 (PEDCOR Investments), and $14,740 (San Antonio Water System). - The minutes from the February 24, 2026 meeting were approved without changes.

The Board of Adjustment met on March 9, 2026, at 1:05 PM with nine members present (quorum). The meeting addressed several variance requests, appeals, and continuances, primarily related to short-term rental permits, carport setbacks, and lot size variances. The meeting lasted until 3:19 PM. Consent Calendar - The minutes from the previous meeting were approved unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 3 (515 Belmont Street): Ben Shoenbaum, a neighbor, spoke in support of the applicant, stating the neighbor was a good neighbor and that the city should allow the applicant to come into compliance rather than revoke the permit. - Item 11 (1027 Southwest Military Drive): Becky Ruiz, president of the Harland El McCullum Neighborhood Association, spoke in support of the buffer variance, citing improved safety and reduction of homeless encampments. - Item 7 (1038 Sherman Street): A voicemail from Lou Francois, Chairperson of the Dignity Hill Historic Neighborhood Review Committee, was played. The committee agreed with OHP's recommendation to deny the nine-foot entrance height request, citing the need for neutrality and fairness. Discussion Items - Item 1 (2751 Spur Street): Request for continuance to April 6, 2026, granted unanimously. - Item 3 (515 Belmont Street): Request for continuance to March 23, 2026, granted unanimously. One speaker (Ben Shoenbaum) spoke in support. - Item 2 (2110 Chitam Trail Drive): Appeal of revocation of a short-term rental permit due to unpaid hotel occupancy taxes. Applicant Jeff Bryson stated he was unaware of the county tax requirement and had mailbox issues. Staff recommended denial. The board initially voted 7-2 to grant the appeal (Commissioners Dean and Ozuna dissenting), but then a motion for reconsideration passed, and the item was continued to March 23, 2026. - Item 5 (154 Babcock Road): Variance request for an accessory structure and barbed wire fence. Applicant Gilbert Vargas amended the request to reduce the rear setback from 5 feet to 15 feet after negotiations with the neighborhood association. The Maverick Neighborhood Association remained opposed. Staff recommended denial. The item was continued to March 23, 2026, to allow the applicant to obtain a letter of support from the neighborhood association. - Item 7 (1038 Sherman Street): The applicant did not appear. The board considered the item after tabling earlier. Staff recommended approval for a 12-foot variance from the minimum 25-foot corner clear vision (to allow 13 feet) and denial for a 4-foot special exemption for fence height (to allow 9 feet). The board approved the clear vision variance (9-0) and approved a modified 1-foot special exemption for a 7-foot fence entrance height (9-0), rather than the requested 9 feet. - Item 8 (3402 Meadow Drive): Variance request for an 8-foot 9-inch variance from the minimum 10-foot front setback to allow a carport with a 1-foot 3-inch setback. The Piper's Meadow Neighborhood Association and neighbors were in support. Staff recommended denial. The board approved the variance (9-0). - Item 9 (1505 Wyoming Street): Multiple variance requests including a 3-foot 8-inch side setback variance for an addition, a variance to allow two doghouses in the front yard, and side and rear setback variances for a carport. Staff recommended denial. The board approved the motions for items 1, 3, and 4 (addition and carport setbacks) (9-0), but did not consider the doghouse variance (item 2) after a friendly amendment to pull it. - Item 10 (224 Canoga Park Avenue): Variance request for a 9-foot 11-inch front setback variance and a 4-foot 11-inch side setback variance for a carport. Staff recommended denial. The applicant amended the request to include gutters on the east side to mitigate water runoff. The board approved the variances (9-0). - Item 11 (1027 Southwest Military Drive): Variance request for a 9-foot variance from the required 15-foot landscape buffer for an oil change facility. Staff recommended denial. The Harland El McCullum Neighborhood Association supported the request. The board approved the variance (9-0). - Item 12 (2026 Beachhaven Drive): Variance request for a 4-foot 11-inch side setback variance for a carport. Staff recommended denial. The board approved the variance (9-0). - Item 13 (124 Parkview Drive): Variance request for a 492 square foot lot size variance and an 11-foot lot width variance for a residential remodel. The Roosevelt Park Neighborhood Association supported. Staff recommended approval. The board approved the variance (9-0). Key Outcomes - Item 1: Continued to April 6, 2026. - Item 3: Continued to March 23, 2026. - Item 2: Continued to March 23, 2026, after reconsideration. - Item 5: Continued to March 23, 2026. - Item 7: Approved 12-foot variance from corner clear vision (9-0) and 1-foot special exception for 7-foot fence height (9-0). - Item 8: Approved 8-foot 9-inch front setback variance for carport (9-0). - Item 9: Approved variances for addition and carport setbacks (items 1,3,4) (9-0); doghouse variance not considered. - Item 10: Approved 9-foot 11-inch front and 4-foot 11-inch side setback variances for carport with gutters (9-0). - Item 11: Approved 9-foot variance from 15-foot buffer for landscape buffer (9-0). - Item 12: Approved 4-foot 11-inch side setback variance for carport (9-0). - Item 13: Approved 492 sq ft lot size variance and 11-foot lot width variance (9-0). - Minutes approved. - Director's report: Voicemail submissions will no longer be accepted after April 1, 2026. Financial disclosure reports are due April 1, 2026.

The San Antonio Zoning Board of Adjustment convened on March 9, 2026, at 1:05 PM with 9 commissioners present. The meeting addressed several variance requests, an appeal of a short-term rental permit revocation, and multiple postponements. The meeting adjourned at 3:19 PM. Public Comments & Testimony - Ben Sean Bomb (neighbor of 515 Belmont Street) spoke in support of the property owner, arguing that revocation of the short-term rental license was excessive and that the owner had improved the neighborhood. - Vicky Rizo (president, Harlandale Neighborhood Association) spoke in support of the variance for Velocity Auto Care at 1027 SW Military Drive, citing the benefits of redeveloping a vacant building that attracted illegal activity. - José Ramírez (voicemail) supported the carport variance at 224 Canoga Park Drive. - The Dignity Hill Neighborhood Association submitted a letter opposing the 9-foot fence height at 1038 Sherman Street, but later the board approved a reduced height. Discussion Items - Postponements: - Item 1 (2751 Forest Expert) postponed to April 6, 2026 (motion approved). - Item 2 (515 Belmont Street) postponed to March 31, 2026 (motion approved). - Appeal of Short-Term Rental Permit Revocation (2110 Chitim Trail): Property owner Jeff Bryson argued he was unaware of the requirement to pay hotel occupancy taxes separately from Airbnb. The board initially voted 7-2 to grant the appeal, but a motion for reconsideration passed, and the case was postponed to March 23, 2026, due to the absence of a full 9-member panel. - Variance for Accessory Structure (154 Babcock Row): Postponed to March 23, 2026, to allow further negotiation with the Maverick Neighborhood Association. - Variance for Carport (6402 Meadow Drive): Approved 9-0. The board found that strict compliance would cause unnecessary hardship and that the carport aligned with the character of the neighborhood. - Multiple Variances (1505 Wyoming Street): Approved 9-0 for items 1, 3, and 4 (carport, main structure expansion, side setback). The doghouse in the front yard (item 2) was removed from the motion and not approved. - Variance for Carport (224 Canoga Park Drive): Approved 9-0 with the condition that the applicant install gutters on the east side to mitigate water runoff. - Variance for Landscape Buffer (1027 SW Military Drive): Approved 9-0. The board noted the property's unique conditions and the neighborhood association's support. - Variance for Carport (2026 Beach Haven): Approved 9-0. The board found that the replacement carport did not increase fire risk and that water runoff was redirected. - Variance for Lot Size and Width (124 Parkview Drive): Approved 9-0. The board noted the lot was undersized due to a prior rezoning and that the development would conform to all other standards. - Special Exception for Fence Height (1038 Sherman Street): After discussion, the board approved a 7-foot height (1-foot exception) instead of the requested 9 feet, and approved the corner visibility variance (12-foot variance) 9-0. Key Outcomes - Votes and Decisions: All variances and special exceptions were approved as described above (9-0). - Reconsideration and Postponement: The short-term rental appeal was reconsidered and postponed to March 23, 2026. - Policy Change: The board announced that voicemail messages will no longer be accepted starting April 1, 2026. - Meeting Adjourned: at 3:19 PM.

The San Antonio City Council met on Thursday, March 5, 2026, from 9:13 AM to 1:58 PM. The meeting included proclamations for Women's History Month, National Nutrition Month, and Social Work Week, recognitions of former councilwoman Maria Antoinette Berizoval and the late Colonel Gil Coronado, a city manager's report on federal immigration activities, and votes on several resolutions and ordinances. The council approved a resolution directing staff to evaluate code changes for detention facilities, adopted the Code Enforcement Strategic Plan, and approved the Greater SATX Regional Economic Partnership services agreement. Proclamations & Recognitions - Women's History Month & International Women's Day: Mayor Gina Ortiz Jones proclaimed March 2026 as Women's History Month and March 8, 2026, as International Women's Day. The council honored former councilwoman Maria Antoinette Berizoval, the first Latina elected to the San Antonio City Council in 1981. Multiple council members expressed gratitude for her leadership and advocacy. - National Nutrition Month: Councilwoman Viagran presented a proclamation for March 2026 as National Nutrition Month, highlighting the “Discover the Power of Nutrition” theme. Staff from Metro Health and community partners (San Antonio Food Bank, Texas Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Food Policy Council) discussed efforts to improve food access and reduce chronic disease. - Social Work Week: Mayor Jones proclaimed March 1–7, 2026, as National School Social Work Week, recognizing SAISD social workers. Irma Hess, director of family student support services, spoke about the “Unite to Ignite” theme and the critical role of school social workers. - Youth Mental Health Survey: Representatives from the San Antonio Youth Commission and Project Worth Teen Ambassadors launched the 2026 Teen Mental Health Survey (open until April 30). They reported that 2024 survey results showed a 15% decrease in self-harm and suicidal ideation compared to 2022, but noted persistent disparities for LGBTQ+ youth. Councilmember Castillo pledged $2,000 in carry-forward funds and challenged colleagues to match; Mayor Jones pledged $5,000. - Recognition of Meloya Gutierrez: Mayor Jones recognized the outgoing state director of the Human Rights Campaign for her work advancing LGBTQ+ equality. - Colonel Gil Coronado: Councilwoman Mesa Gonzalez honored the late Colonel Coronado, a West Side native who served 30 years in the Air Force and was instrumental in expanding Hispanic Heritage Week to a month-long celebration. City Manager's Report – Immigration Activities Deputy City Manager Maria Villagomez reported on actions taken following the February 12 resolution regarding federal immigration enforcement. Highlights: - Completed: Legal pathways referrals continue; know-your-rights training via American Gateways; an economic impact report on migrants (available on city website); tracking of ICE requests for SAPD assistance (no requests since Feb 12; monthly reports starting March 31). - In Progress: Staff training on ICE entry protocols; an ICE dashboard linked to the city website (expected by March 6); community reporting mechanism via third party (evaluation due by end of March). - Under Evaluation: Procurement changes (referred to Economic Workforce Development Committee), code changes for detention facilities (see item 5 below), assessment of federal law compliance, and a justice fund for victims of ICE activity (legal criteria evaluation by April 15). - Clarification Sought: Items 20 (insurance liability and risk exposure) and 21 (training on prevention of harm from immigration enforcement). Councilmembers provided direction, including expanding staff training to include bystander rights and protections. Consent Calendar Items 6 through 46 were approved together, minus items 33 and 34 which were pulled for individual consideration. Highlights from councilmember comments on consent items: - Item 14: Contract for improving neighborhood access across I-37 (land bridge). - Item 45: Funds for design of a community center and park at Mid Crown Drive and Eisenhower Road. - Item 12: Planning grant for safety improvements on Culebra Road. - Item 30: Reappointments to the Housing Trust Board. - Item 22: Appointment to Veterans Advisory Commission. - Item 41: Goodwill San Antonio operations center in District 1. - Item 46: Release of remaining funds for YWCA Women's Live and Learn Center. - Item 43: Opioid settlement funding distribution for harm reduction and treatment. - Item 20: Grant acceptance for Texas Anti-Gang Unit Program. - Item 27: Appointment to Small Business Advisory Commission. - Item 28 & 29: Appointments to SAIS Commission and Stormwater Management Board. Public Comments & Testimony - On Consent Agenda (Items 33 & 34): Antonio Diaz urged rejection of state grant funds for the Texas Anti-Gang Unit, arguing it would turn local police into ICE agents. Jack Finger criticized the appointment of Hector Barrera to the LGBTQ+ advisory board, citing religious objections. Herschel Boyd spoke about his property being taken by VIA via eminent domain, requesting transparency. Don Bamond and Montgomery Howard spoke in support of the Code Enforcement Strategic Plan, praising the work of code officers and requesting evening/weekend enforcement. - On Item 5 (Detention Facilities): Several residents spoke against ICE detention facilities. Hilda Santiago shared her personal story of her husband being detained by ICE; she urged the council to use all available powers to prevent the proposed facility. Ricardo Jimenez, a pastor and psychologist, called for humane treatment and noted the trauma of detention. Antonio Diaz rejected the anti-gang grant as a tool for racial profiling. Diana Flores Uriegas and others demanded the council reject all cooperation with ICE. Discussion Items Item 5 – Resolution for Code Changes on Detention Facilities The council considered a resolution directing staff to evaluate Unified Development Code (UDC) amendments for detention facilities. Options presented included creating a new zoning district, requiring specific use authorization, or establishing buffer requirements. Staff recommended an expedited process (45 days) over a standard process (5 months) and explained that a moratorium would be limited to 180 days and take longer to implement. Councilmember McKee Rodriguez moved to amend the resolution to also initiate a moratorium process in parallel. After debate, the amendment passed (vote not recorded by voice but carried). The amended resolution then passed. Councilmembers expressing support: McKee Rodriguez, Viagran, Mungia, Castillo, Mesa Gonzalez, and Corps. Opposition: Councilmembers Spears and White, who argued the resolution was vague, ineffective, and could set a dangerous precedent for local immigration policy. Councilmember White noted it would not affect federal facilities. Councilmember Spears raised concerns about discriminatory zoning and legal defensibility. Item 33 – Code Enforcement Strategic Plan The council approved the strategic plan for code enforcement. Councilmember Corps expressed concerns about vague metrics and resource allocation. Councilmember Mungia highlighted the importance of community input and proactive vs. reactive enforcement. Councilmember Viagran called for additional weekend and evening officers. Deputy City Manager Villagomez confirmed that 2025 would serve as a baseline for metrics, with quarterly reports to the Public Safety Committee. The plan was approved. Item 34 – Greater SATX Regional Economic Partnership Agreement The council approved a one-year services agreement (with two one-year renewal options) for up to $759,250 annually. The contract includes a base amount for deliverables and a performance-based component of $150,000 tied to jobs paying over $100,000 (capped at 306 jobs; $500 per job). Councilmember Corps questioned the base amount and the attestation process for job creation. Economic Development Director Brenda Hicks-Ons explained that companies will now sign an attestation form confirming that Greater SATX assistance led to job creation. Councilmembers expressed support for the partnership, noting the importance of wage growth and educational attainment goals. The agreement was approved. Key Outcomes - Resolution for Detention Facility Code Changes (Item 5): Approved as amended to include a parallel moratorium process. The amended motion carried. Staff will expedite the UDC amendment process. - Code Enforcement Strategic Plan (Item 33): Approved. Staff will report quarterly on metrics using 2025 as baseline. - Greater SATX Agreement (Item 34): Approved. The contract includes a new attestation process for job creation verification. - Consent Agenda: Approved minus items 33 and 34. - Executive Session: The council met briefly in executive session (1:17 PM – 1:58 PM) to discuss economic development negotiations, real property, and legal issues. No action was taken.