Public Meetings - San Antonio, Texas

The San Antonio City Council met on Thursday, March 19, 2026, beginning at 9:18 AM, with Mayor Pro Tem Jalen McKee Rodriguez presiding. The meeting opened with an invocation by Nathan Clardy of Calvary Hills Baptist Church, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. The council approved minutes from previous meetings, issued proclamations, recognized community members, and approved the consent agenda. One public comment was heard regarding eminent domain. The meeting then entered executive session and reconvened briefly before adjourning at 10:39 AM. Consent Calendar - Items 5 through 38 were approved as a group without opposition. Highlights included: - Item 23: Grant from the federal bipartisan infrastructure bill for five quick-build projects. - Item 36: Resolution of no objection for 4% housing tax credits for Quantum Drive construction in District 4. - Item 37: Amendments to the TIFF program policy. - Item 19: Parks department cooperation with schools to provide nadatorium pool access. - Item 21: Funding for HIV and STI testing, education, and prevention staff through Metro Health. - Item 8: Construction contract for Maverick Creek Greenway (UTSA Boulevard to Loop 1604). - Item 20: Lease and management agreement with Phil Hardburger Park Conservancy, including assignment of the dairy barn. - Item 7: Improvements at Lady Bird Johnson Park funded by the 2022 bond program. - Items 27-30: Reappointments and appointments to the Building Standards Board, Port Authority of San Antonio, Multimodal Transportation Commission, and Animal Care Services Advisory Board. Public Comments & Testimony - Herschel Boyd spoke on Item 6, opposing the city’s eminent domain practices as exercised by VIA. He stated that VIA’s takeover of his property at 107 Mary Louise Drive, along with two rental units, ruined his tenants' livelihoods. He criticized the “Landowner’s Bill of Rights” as unfair and called for the council to slow down the process and ensure authentic investigations into appraisal practices. He urged the council not to grant private corporations the power to take citizens’ property without adequate oversight. Proclamations and Recognitions - Persian New Year (Noruz): The council proclaimed March 20, 2026, as Noruz Day in San Antonio. A community representative accepted the proclamation, highlighting the holiday’s 3,000-year history and its celebration by over 300 million people worldwide, and noted the estimated 5,000 Iranians in San Antonio. - Theater in Our Schools Month: The council proclaimed March 2026 as Theater in Our Schools Month. Aidan Winfield, Vice President of Taft Theatre’s Troop 4557, accepted on behalf of Texas Thespians. Councilmember Galvan spoke about his own background as a theater student and encouraged support for arts funding. - Points of Personal Privilege: - Councilmember (District 2) honored Mia Morris, a counselor and MLK Commission March Committee chair who recently passed away. Family members, including Dr. Shawanda Riley and Jennifer Morris, shared remarks. - Councilmember Galvan honored Bert Pikel (passed November 7, 2025) and Andy Green (passed February 12, 2026), both long-time community volunteers and advocates in District 6. - Councilmember Villagran invited the public to District 3’s annual 5K and Women’s History event on March 19, 2026, at Stinson Airport Trailhead, with a one-mile senior walk and local vendors. City Manager’s Report - City Manager Eric provided three updates: 1. The Texas Town and City magazine cover features a Westside San Antonio mural created through the city’s Revitalized SA Corridor Leadership Program. 2. Airport construction updates: Beginning March 23, 2026, the first phase of a zero-curb transition will begin, closing the far right lane. Travelers should plan for temporary changes. The terminal development program is on schedule and on budget, with five construction cranes on site. 3. A Women’s History Month spotlight video highlighted Rebecca Valdez and Shamika Henry of the Homeless Services and Strategy outreach team, emphasizing teamwork and integrity. Key Outcomes - Approved minutes of the City Council meetings of February 23, 27, and March 4, 5, 2026, by voice vote. - Approved consent agenda (Items 5-38) by voice vote with no dissenting votes. - No votes were taken on proclamations or recognitions. - Executive session was held from 10:00 AM to 10:39 AM to discuss economic development, real estate, legal issues, and collective bargaining. No official action was taken. - The meeting adjourned at 10:39 AM.

The Historic and Design Review Commission (HDRC) met on Wednesday, March 18, 2026, at 3:00 p.m. to consider several certificate of appropriateness applications. The meeting included a consent agenda, public testimony, and discussion on four regular agenda items, with the major item being Phase 2 of the Brackenridge Park Bond projects. The commission approved all agenda items, with votes on each item passing unanimously (11-0). Consent Calendar - Items 2 through 8 were approved with staff stipulations on a single motion. The addresses included: 401 Vita, 462 Mary Louise, 344 North, 600 Theo Parkway, 118 East Reish, 201 West Mariposa, and 9599 Braun. No public comments or voicemails were received on these items. Public Comments & Testimony - Brackenridge Park Phase 2 (Item 1): The commission received 54 voicemails: 45 in support and 9 opposed. In-person speakers included: - Suzanne Scott (Chair, Brackenridge Park Conservancy Board) – Expressed full support for the project, noting the Conservancy backed the final recommendations. - Chris Maitree (CEO, Brackenridge Park Conservancy) – Supported approval, citing $9,676,751 in 2017 bond funds and $5.5 million in Conservancy donations; noted 3,353 days since project approval with no work done. - Alicia Garlock – Opposed the plans, asking for delay until a playground funded by private donors is completed; argued removal of 88 picnic areas and parking spaces would harm accessibility and cultural traditions (e.g., the Serda family’s 69-year Easter tradition). - John Greedle (Attorney for Perez v. City of San Antonio litigation) – Requested preservation of trees 106 and 141, stating they are cultural and religious resources for indigenous groups; noted the Army Corps of Engineers consultation with the Comanche Nation is ongoing. - Ida Ayala – Opposed removal of picnic tables and parking, arguing it contradicts the Cultural Landscape Report’s recommendation to retain existing uses; cited the park’s importance for underprivileged populations. - Susan Strong – Opposed cutting trees 106 and 141, stating they are the only remaining trees in the pump house viewscape; questioned the placement of new picnic tables near a bike path and zoo fence, calling it potentially dangerous. - Ellen Patterson (Attorney and cancer survivor) – Opposed tree removal, presenting environmental benefits of mature oak trees (oxygen production, carbon sequestration, shade, cooling). Discussion Items - Brackenridge Park Phase 2 (Item 1): Mike Shannon, Director of Capital Delivery, presented updates from the January meeting. Changes included: adding two ADA parking spaces near the north entrance (Hildebrand side) and nine new picnic tables. This resulted in the loss of 10 proposed new trees out of 250 total, and impervious cover reduction changed from 10% (to 27%) to 9% (to 28%). The stone kiosk relocation was confirmed with Texas Historical Commission approval. Discussion centered on tree removal (trees 106 and 141 are in Phase 1, not Phase 2; litigation does not involve Phase 2), picnic table placement, and the need for more ADA spaces. Commissioner Velasquez questioned the separation of bike trail (item 7) and cultural trail (item 8). The design team explained safety and interpretive reasons. Commissioner Savino and Fetzer encouraged increasing picnic tables and parking further. Commissioner Galloway opposed heritage tree removal but noted public feedback was incorporated. - 1253/1255 East Crockett (Item 9): The applicant requested amendments to a previously approved construction: roof form change to front-facing gable, removal of fenestration on west facade (later restored in revised plans), 12-foot driveway (reduced to 10 feet per staff), and landscaping. The Dignity Hill Historic Neighborhood Review Committee submitted a letter supporting staff’s fenestration concerns and objecting to the 12-foot driveway and xeric landscaping. The applicant agreed to all staff stipulations, including reducing driveway width and adding natural grass or submitting a detailed landscaping plan. The motion approved item 1 as submitted, item 2 as per revised drawings (fenestration restored), item 3 (driveway at 10 feet), and item 4 with staff stipulations. - 2509 Mission Road (Item 10): The applicant (Ruben Sausedo, owner) sought approval to construct four two-story single-family homes in the Mission Historic District. Staff recommended approval with stipulations on siding materials, window profiles, fenestration, walkway alignment, and landscaping. The applicant agreed to all stipulations. Motion approved unanimously. - 219 Theren Boulevard (Item 11): The applicants (Dorian Casitas and Jose Mora) requested approval to repair/replace existing brick cladding (with lime wash) and construct a front porch. They argued brick is more cost-effective than restoring original wood siding (estimated $35,000 vs. $30,000 to remove brick). Staff recommended against the brick cladding, citing guidelines to remove non-historic material. After discussion, Commissioner Group moved to approve with stipulations: allow brick where it previously existed (front of house had brick that fell off), no lime wash, and the porch not approved. The applicants clarified the house was originally fully brick-clad. The motion passed, allowing brick repair where previously present, with wood elsewhere. Key Outcomes - Item 1 (Brackenridge Park Phase 2): Approved with staff stipulations. Vote: 11-0. - Item 9 (1253/1255 East Crockett): Approved with staff stipulations and applicant agreements. Vote: 11-0. - Item 10 (2509 Mission Road): Approved with staff stipulations. Vote: 11-0. - Item 11 (219 Theren Boulevard): Approved with stipulations: brick replacement allowed where previously existed; no lime wash; front porch not approved; siding materials to be wood where brick was not original. Vote: 11-0. - All approvals require compliance with federal, state, and local laws regarding archaeology (where applicable), and certificates of appropriateness will be emailed within 10 days.

The Governance Committee of the City of San Antonio met on Wednesday, March 18, 2026, at 10:03 AM to consider three council consideration requests. The meeting lasted until 10:20 AM. Members present included Council Members Villagrán, Munguía, Spears, and the Interim Mayor. All three agenda items were discussed and approved by a single motion. Consent Calendar - The minutes of the previous board meeting were approved unanimously (motion made, seconded, and passed). Discussion Items - Real-Time Train Notification System (District 2, Council Member Mackie Rodriguez): Public Works Director Art Bernard presented a proposal to develop a program for real-time notification of train activity at railroad crossings. Key components include partnering with Union Pacific, UTSA, and Google Maps; evaluating detection technologies; focusing on high-impact corridors; and considering budget, legal, and liability concerns. Approximately 500 level crossings exist in San Antonio, with fewer than 10% having limited traffic signals. The staff will continue to explore feasibility and report to the Transportation Committee. - Commemorative Avenue Designation for José Flores III (District 6, Council Member Galván): Development Services Director Amin Tomás presented a request to name a street segment between Metroway Drive and West Edge Drive in honor of José Flores III. Staff recommended advancing the review process, including technical review, public meetings, Planning Commission, and final City Council approval. - Blanco Road Rezoning (District 1, Council Member Dr. Suk Core): Tomás also presented a request to rezone a large area near Blanco Road (between Fresno Street and Hildebrand Street, approximately 300 feet east and west of Blanco) to align properties with existing land use. Council Member Core explained that the rezoning would enable a major rehabilitation project and correct nonconforming uses. The area is near the future Green Line expansion. Staff recommended proceeding with analysis and referring the matter to Council Session A. Key Outcomes - The committee approved a single motion to support all three council consideration requests, directing staff to proceed with further planning and community engagement. The meeting adjourned at 10:20 AM.

The Governance Committee of the San Antonio City Council met on Wednesday, March 18, 2026, at 10:03 AM and adjourned at 10:20 AM. The meeting addressed three Council Consideration Requests (CCRs): a real-time train notification system, a memorial street designation, and a large-area rezoning along Blanco Road. All items were approved unanimously. Consent Calendar - The minutes of the previous meeting were approved unanimously by voice vote. Discussion Items - Real-Time Train Notification System (CCR 2026-0002): Councilmember McKee Rodriguez (District 2) introduced a proposal to develop and implement a system providing real-time information on train activity at railroad crossings. Public Works Director Art Reinhart presented staff analysis, noting about 500 at-grade crossings, of which only about 10% are near traffic signals with preemption technology. He outlined considerations including partnerships with rail operators and third-party apps, technology evaluation, pilot corridors, funding, security concerns about real-time train data, and liability issues. Staff requested time to return with recommendations to the Transportation Committee. Councilmember McKee Rodriguez emphasized the equity and safety impacts of unpredictable delays. Councilmembers Viagran and Mungia expressed support, with Mungia noting that if one can track a pizza order, one should be able to track trains. The item was approved unanimously. - Memorial Way for Joseph Flores III (CCR 2026-0003): Development Services Director Amin Tomaz presented the proposal to designate a portion of Marbach Road between Meadowway Drive and West Edge Drive as "Jose Flores III Memorial Way." Staff recommended proceeding with the review process including technical review, public meetings, and planning commission input. Councilmember Galvan and Councilmember Mungia co-signed the request, citing the desire to honor a student and improve pedestrian safety. The item was approved unanimously. - Large-Area Rezoning on Blanco Road (CCR 2026-0004): Director Tomaz explained the proposal to rezone properties within the North Central Neighborhood Association (bounded by Fresno Street, Hildebrand Avenue, and approximately 300 feet east/west of Blanco Road) to align zoning with existing uses and future land use plans. Councilmember Core (District 1) noted that a resident was ineligible for home rehab programs due to improper zoning (many properties were zoned industrial). She expressed interest in creating more residential density near the future Green Line, while clarifying that upzoning would be optional for property owners. Councilmember Viagran cautioned against allowing exemptions based on potential future sale value, emphasizing that only actionable development plans should justify different zoning. Councilmember Mungia expressed 100% support for the missing middle approach. Staff recommended referral to a session to initiate the large-area zoning process. The item was approved unanimously. Key Outcomes - All three CCRs (items 2, 3, and 4) were approved by unanimous voice vote. The real-time train notification item will be developed with further staff analysis and returned to the Transportation Committee. The memorial way and Blanco rezoning items will proceed through their respective staff-led processes including public engagement and subsequent council consideration.

Meeting Overview The Historic Design and Review Commission (HDRC) held a regular meeting on March 18, 2026, at 3:00 PM. All 12 commissioners were present. The meeting began with approval of minutes from the previous meeting and a consent calendar of eight items. The primary agenda item was Phase 2 of the Brackenridge Park improvement project, which drew substantial public comment and discussion. Three additional items were heard individually: a residential project at 1253-1255 Crockett, four townhomes at 509 Mission Road, and a porch addition at 1919 Thorain Boulevard. All items were approved, some with specific stipulations. Consent Calendar - The commission approved the minutes from the March 2026 meeting unanimously. - Eight items (items 2 through 8) were approved on the consent calendar as recommended by staff, with stipulations, on a motion that passed unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Brackenridge Park Phase 2: A total of 54 voicemails were received; 35 expressed support and 9 expressed opposition (the remaining 10 were not categorized in the transcript). Five people spoke in person. Susan Scott, President of the Brackenridge Park Council, expressed full support for the project, noting community engagement. Chris Maitrey, executive officer of a supporting organization, spoke in favor, citing City Council approval and the need to move forward after 3,033 days since the bond was approved. Arisha Garlock spoke in opposition, requesting a delay or stop, raising concerns about parking removal, accessibility for disabled persons, and disruption to family gatherings. John Greel, representing Gary Rez and Ms. Torres in ongoing litigation, opposed the removal of trees 106 and 141, arguing they are cultural and religious resources. Another speaker (Olivia) opposed the removal of picnic tables and parking spaces, arguing it contradicts the park’s reconciliation report and would exclude low-income users. Sarmstrom, who was given extra time, opposed the design, particularly regarding tree removal and the placement of picnic tables near the bike lane. Patterson, a cancer survivor, spoke against tree removal, emphasizing the health and environmental benefits of mature oak trees. - 1253-1255 Crockett: A voicemail and a letter from a neighborhood association expressed concerns about the fenestration and materials, but no in-person public comment was recorded. Discussion Items - Brackenridge Park Phase 2 (Item 1): Staff presented modifications since the January meeting, including adding nine picnic tables, providing two accessible parking spaces (with willingness to consider more), relocating a historic stone kiosk, and reducing impervious cover by 1% (from 10% reduction to 9%). The project is funded by the 2017 bond and additional private donations. Staff highlighted the incorporation of public feedback from site walks. Commissioners questioned the design, picnic table locations, parking for disabled persons, tree impacts (especially trees 106 and 141), and the relationship to ongoing litigation. Legal counsel clarified that the two trees are part of Phase 1, not Phase 2, and that their removal is already subject to permitting and litigation, outside the scope of this item. After extensive discussion, a motion was made to approve as presented with staff stipulations. - 1253-1255 Crockett (Item 9): The applicant sought approval to modify a previously approved building by changing the roof form, removing some fenestration, and adding a 12-foot-wide driveway. Staff recommended approval of the roof modification, but not the fenestration removal, and required the driveway width be reduced to 10 feet. The applicant revised the design to add back windows and agreed to reduce the driveway. The motion passed with stipulations. - 509 Mission Road (Item 10): The applicant proposed four two-story single-family homes. Staff recommended approval with multiple stipulations regarding materials, fenestration, landscaping, and parking. The applicant (Ruben Saucedo) and architect (Brenda) agreed to all stipulations. The item was approved unanimously. - 1919 Thorain Boulevard (Item 11): The applicant requested a certificate of appropriateness to add a 96-square-foot porch and to retain existing painted brick siding on the house. Staff recommended approval of the porch, but recommended replacing non-historic brick with wood siding. The applicants argued that removing brick was cost-prohibitive and that the brick was original (though painted). Commissioners debated whether brick was original material. The motion was modified to allow brick where the applicant could demonstrate it had existed previously, and to accept wood where brick had fallen off. A site visit was suggested but not required. The motion passed. Key Outcomes - Brackenridge Park Phase 2: Approved on a motion by Commissioner Howard, seconded, with staff stipulations. The vote was unanimous (all 12 commissioners in favor). The approval includes the addition of picnic tables, accessible parking, and a 1% reduction in impervious cover compared to the previous design. The stone kiosk will be relocated. Tree removal is not part of this phase. - 1253-1255 Crockett: Approved with staff stipulations (roof modification, driveway width of 10 feet, fenestration as revised). Vote was unanimous. - 509 Mission Road: Approved with all staff stipulations. Vote was unanimous. - 1919 Thorain Boulevard: Approved with a modified motion: brick may be retained where it existed historically; wood siding to be used elsewhere. The applicants were encouraged to work with staff. Vote was unanimous.

The Educational Opportunities Committee of the San Antonio City Council met on March 17, 2026, at 10:03 AM. The meeting focused on updates regarding the Ambassador Program, Café College, Alamo Promise, Bold Promise (UTSA), and Jaguar Promise (Texas A&M San Antonio). Council members discussed program metrics, demographic data, and the potential for expanding youth opportunities. The meeting concluded at 12:30 PM. Consent Calendar - The minutes of the previous meeting were approved by a motion, with no abstentions noted. Discussion Items Ambassador Program Update (Item 2) - Presentation by Rebeca (DHS staff): The Ambassador Program, launched in 2004, provides paid internships for San Antonio high school graduates who have completed at least 25 college credit hours and have a 2.5 GPA. In 2025, the program received 354 applications for 200 funded slots (212 accepted due to additional funds in 2024). Employers in 2025 submitted 352 internship requests. The program budget is $83,000, with the majority going toward intern wages. Key metrics reported: 97% of interns better understood career opportunities in San Antonio; 93% felt better about their careers after the internship; 74% of alumni agreed they were more likely to consider jobs in San Antonio; 54% currently live in San Antonio. The program also reported 212 interns accepted in 2025 and 212 completed successfully. - Presentation by Ana Cebedo (director of SAEP): The San Antonio Education Partnership (SAEP), founded in 1989, serves over 12,000 individuals annually. 96% are people of color, 78% are first-generation college students, and 76% are low- to moderate-income. SAEP provides two models: "Camino al Éxito" (pathway to success) operating in 29 high schools, and Café College, which serves both youth and adults (roughly 50/50). Café College offers one-on-one counseling, SAT sessions, and credential evaluation for foreign-educated individuals. SAEP administers $1.4 million in scholarships from the city. Metrics for 2025 showed the highest service numbers in five years. Council members discussed expanding the program to include high school students without college credit, and integrating with Ready to Work and municipal court diversion programs. - Councilmember Munguía expressed strong support, noting that six ambassadors from District 4 now work in her office. She also shared a personal story about her sister using Café College services. - Councilmember Cor asked about repeat ambassador metrics and the residency rate (54%) of alumni. She requested more detailed data on where former interns reside and whether they return to San Antonio after college. - Councilmember Castillo suggested piloting a program with Ready to Work for on-the-job training, and asked for demographic data by council district. - Councilmember Maki Rodríguez questioned how scholarships are administered across institutions and expressed concern about potential duplication with Alamo Promise. She requested data on geographic distribution of Café College clients by ZIP code. Alamo Promise Program Update (Item 4) - Presentation by Stefany Vásquez (Alamo Colleges director): Alamo Promise is a tuition-free college program for high school graduates in Bexar County, launched in 2019. No income or GPA requirements. In 2025, Alamo Colleges enrolled over 90,000 students a record, with 16,000 first-time freshmen (70% first-generation). The program serves over 30,000 Promise students cumulatively, with 4,000 having graduated (as of the presentation). Funding sources: $5 million from Alamo Colleges district, $4.6 million from the city, $200,000 from the Alamo Colleges Foundation, and $24—$25 million in financial aid. A study by Dr. Belinda Román (St. Mary's University) found a return of $4.22 for every $1 invested. Councilmember Cor noted a potential gap for adult students who left college and want to return; staff said they handle such cases individually. Bold Promise (UTSA) Update (Item 5) - Presentation by Eric Cooper (UTSA staff): Bold Promise covers tuition and fees for families earning $100,000 or less (expanded from $50,000 in 2020). As of spring 2026, 5,570 students enrolled in the program. Demographics: 68% first-generation; 5% higher retention rate than non–Bold Promise students; 7% higher four-year graduation rate; average GPA above 3.0; students borrow $1,400 less than the average. Cooper also highlighted collaborations with Café College and SA ID for FAFSA completion. Jaguar Promise (Texas A&M San Antonio) Update (Item 6) - Presentation by Vanessa Torres (associate VP): Jaguar Promise covers tuition and fees for Texas residents graduating in the top 10% of their high school class (no income limit) and for transfer students from Alamo Colleges with family income below $70,000. Students receive an additional $300 for personal expenses. Since 2020, enrollment has increased 108%. Retention rates: 93% for Promise students vs. 86% for the general population. Torres also highlighted summer bridge programs and the "Promise to Promise" initiative with Alamo Colleges. Data Integration and Future Agenda Planning - Councilmember Cor proposed integrating data across city departments (e.g., public safety, housing, transportation) to create layered maps that show correlations between education outcomes and other factors (e.g., crime, housing instability, access to services). She suggested starting with three indicators: kindergarten readiness, third-grade reading scores, and youth opportunity. - Councilmember Munguía agreed, but cautioned against overloading nonprofits with reporting requirements. She emphasized focusing on early childhood education and reducing barriers. - Councilmember Maki Rodríguez requested to see three specific outcome indicators (kindergarten readiness, third-grade reading, youth opportunity) mapped by ZIP code to identify where investment is most needed. - Councilmember Castillo supported inviting community advisory groups (e.g., Higher Education Advisory Council) to provide updates and align efforts with indirect factors like housing and transportation. - Committee Chair summarized the consensus to focus on specific benchmarks and coordinate with the PCDC to avoid duplication. A future meeting will include more detailed data visualization. Key Outcomes - The committee agreed to prioritize three educational benchmarks (kindergarten readiness, third-grade reading, youth opportunity) for future data mapping and resource allocation. - Staff will work with council offices to provide demographic data by district for the Ambassador Program and Café College. - The Ambassador Program will explore expanding eligibility to high school students (seniors) and potential integration with municipal court diversion programs, as suggested by Councilmember Munguía. - The committee will coordinate with the PCDC to align indirect factors (housing, transportation) with education outcomes in future presentations. - Next steps include compiling granular data from multiple departments (public safety, housing, 3-1-1, etc.) to create visual layers that show correlations, with a timeline of several months.

This Public Safety Committee meeting, chaired by Councilwoman [name not stated], reviewed the performance metrics of the San Antonio Fire Department and the third-year evaluation of the city's violent crime reduction plan. The meeting also included a brief update on animal care services, though the final agenda item was postponed due to time constraints. Consent Calendar - The minutes from the previous Board meeting were approved with a vote of 3-0-1 (3 in favor, 0 opposed, 1 abstention). Discussion Items Fire Department Performance Metrics - Fire Chief [presumed] presented operational statistics for fiscal years 2024 and 2025. In FY2024, the department responded to 7,070 incidents; in FY2025, incidents increased by 25% to 2,233 (note: likely a typo, as 7,070 to 2,233 is a decrease; the transcript states "aumentó un poquito" but numbers suggest inconsistency). Medical responses account for approximately 75% of total incidents. As of February 2026, the department had already responded to over 102,000 incidents this fiscal year. The most active stations (double companies) are Stations 32, 35, 29, 37, and 44. Top non-medical calls include fire alarms, fire investigations, and grass fires; top medical calls include sick persons, vehicle crashes, falls, breathing problems, and chest pain. Fire prevention conducted 24,000 inspections in the past year. - Council members requested more granular data: Councilwoman [Mackie Rodríguez] asked for incident breakdown by district, especially for District 5 where falls are prevalent. Councilman [Spears?] requested response time metrics and compliance percentages. Councilman [White?] asked for trend analysis from 2019 to present, both medical and non-medical, to identify rising or falling incident types. Councilman [Castillo?] requested fire cause analysis for structural fires, including the percentage involving vacant structures. The Chief agreed to provide additional data at the next committee meeting. A request was also made for seasonal trend analysis to inform prevention policies. Third-Year Evaluation of the Violent Crime Reduction Plan - Dr. Smith (evaluator) and Maria Vargas (Office Director) presented the third annual evaluation of the Violent Crime Reduction Plan. The plan has three strategies: (1) increased police visibility (ongoing), (2) focused deterrence in high-crime hotspots (implemented in two locations, including 4032 Southcross Boulevard since June 2025), and (3) long-term intervention for repeat offenders (not yet started). - Since plan implementation (2023-2025): Overall violent crime victimization decreased by 9.5%. In 2025 alone, San Antonio saw a 21% reduction in street violence and victimization. Specific reductions in 2025: homicides down 18%, robberies down 17%, deadly conduct down 32%, aggravated assaults down 19.8% compared to 2024. - Hotspot policing results: In the 30-35 treated hotspots (300-meter grid cells rotated every 60 days), violent crime dropped 63.3% during treatment. Focused deterrence (extra visible patrols for 15 minutes at peak times) reduced crime by 52%. Difference-in-differences analysis showed a 44% reduction in treated hotspots compared to controls, with a 30% reduction persisting for about one month after treatment. The department achieved 95% compliance in placing resources at intended hotspots. - For the second location (4032 Southcross Boulevard): Violent crime and domestic violence victimization decreased by 50% on average per month from June to December 2025. - Phase 3 (focused deterrence for repeat offenders) will involve police, the District Attorney's office, and nonprofit partners to identify and intervene with high-risk individuals, offering social services (education, job training, housing) as an alternative to prosecution. No additional funding is currently committed; budget discussions will occur. Council members debated the plan's effectiveness: Councilman [White] noted that increased police presence produces measurable crime reductions, while Councilwoman [Castillo] emphasized the need for holistic investments (housing, mental health, youth programs) to address root causes. Councilman [Mackie Rodríguez] requested a map showing correlation between crime reduction and community investments (by zip code). Key Outcomes - The Committee approved the previous meeting minutes (3-0-1). - No formal votes were taken on other items. The Fire Department will provide requested data (incident breakdown by district, response time metrics, trends, fire cause analysis) at the next committee meeting. - The violent crime reduction plan evaluation was accepted as presented; no formal action was taken. Staff will explore accelerating Phase 3 implementation and provide cost estimates for additional hotspot locations. - The final agenda item (animal care services update) was postponed due to loss of quorum and will be addressed at a future meeting.

The San Antonio Zoning Commission met on March 17, 2026, at 1:00 PM, under the chairmanship of President John Bustamantes. The commission considered consent agenda items and several individual zoning cases, with public comments received via voicemail and in person. The meeting adjourned at approximately 2:16 PM. Consent Calendar The commission approved the following items on the consent calendar (Articles 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, and 16) by a unanimous vote (11-0): - Article 5: Rezoning at 7701 Broadway Street (from C-2 to unspecified). One voicemail was played: Zebeck Jones, president of Chateau Dijon Homeowners Association, expressed support for the change, stating that after investigation the development would not impact their property and that they had no problems with the business. - Article 7: Specific use permit for storage and properties at 3610 Speedway Run, with conditions accepted by the applicant. - Article 8: Conditional use for a construction facility at 5210 Sherry and Road (R6 to C2 CDs). - Article 9: Rezoning at Wurst Park Road (C2, NAC2 to C3 AC3). - Article 10: Certificate for DRAC2 at 107 South Star Sarmora Street. - Article 12: Change from R6 to C1 for a wireless communications system, with amended site plan (0.1 NCB 1079). - Article 14: Rezoning from C3 NA to R4 CD for two dwelling units at Beacon Hill; one voicemail in support from Cynthia Walker, president of Beacon Hill Neighborhood Association's Design and Zoning Committee, stating they voted to support the change to align with their neighborhood. - Article 15: Rezoning for two dwelling units at 731 East Nottingham Drive (to R4 CD with conditional use); Oak Park Neighborhood Association in favor. - Article 16: Rezoning from C1 to C2 at 311 Howard Street; no opposition. Public Comments & Testimony - Article 5: Zebeck Jones (voicemail) supported the change on behalf of Chateau Dijon Homeowners Association. - Article 14: Cynthia Walker (voicemail) supported the rezoning on behalf of Beacon Hill Neighborhood Association. - Article 11 (continued): Drea Garza, speaking in person as a resident of Mayfair Condominiums, requested a continuance to allow more dialogue with the community regarding parking impacts. Janice Clayton (voicemail) opposed the zoning change due to lack of parking, calling it a negative effect on visitors and residents. Tony Garcia (voicemail) requested the commission approve a continuance so the applicant could speak with their neighborhood association (Montevista). - Article 3: No public comments were received. - Article 6: No public comments were received. Continuances and Postponements The commission approved the following continuances (all votes were 11-0): - Articles 11, 13, 17, and 18: Continued to the meeting of April 7, 2026, on a motion by Commissioner Hui, seconded by Commissioner Kellum. - Article 4: Continued to April 23, 2026, on a motion by Commissioner Duval. Discussion Items - Article 3 (3406 Western North Drive): Request for rezoning from C3 NA to C3 with a specific use authorization for a contractor storage facility (construction). The site is adjacent to residential neighborhoods. Staff recommended approval with Edwards Aquifer protection conditions. Applicant John Coley explained that the existing use is similar (previous plumbing contractor), and the neighborhood association president did not object (spring break). Discussion centered on fencing, lighting, and consistency with the North Sector Plan (which designates the area as suburban). Commissioners noted that the adjacent commercial uses predate the residential development. Commissioner Kelly moved to approve the request, seconded by Commissioner Kellum. A friendly amendment requiring down-lighting (shielding) was accepted. The motion passed 11-0. - Article 6 (1795 Sherman Road): Request for rezoning from R20 (single-family residential) to C2 NA (commercial, no alcohol sales) for a contractor office and storage. The property had a prior demolition permit (April 2025). Applicant Gos Gonzalez (GG Engineering) stated the new owner wants to use the property for offices and small-scale storage, not outdoor materials. The area along Sherman Road is a mix of commercial and industrial uses. The adjacent R20 parcel is a small residence, and a school with a 10-foot fence lies behind. Commissioners discussed the difficulty of transitioning between residential and commercial, the lack of objections from neighbors (no response to notices), and the historical commercial character of the corridor. Commissioner Kelly moved to approve, seconded by Commissioner Pete Rodriguez. The motion passed 11-0. Key Outcomes - Consent calendar: All nine items (5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16) approved unanimously. - Continuances: Articles 11, 13, 17, and 18 continued to April 7; Article 4 continued to April 23. - Article 3: Approved (11-0) with condition for down-lighting. - Article 6: Approved (11-0). - Minutes: Approved from the March 3, 2026 meeting. - Director's Report: The commission will hold a work session on April 7 (starting at 12:15 PM) regarding UDC amendments within city limits, with documentation provided in advance. The commission noted that this was the last hearing using voicemail public comment; starting the next meeting, voicemail will be phased out.

The San Antonio Zoning Commission held a regularly noticed meeting on March 17, 2026, at 1:00 PM. Chair John Bustamante (District 5) presided. The commission acted on multiple zoning cases, including a consent agenda, continuances, and two individual hearing items. The meeting concluded at 2:16 PM. Consent Calendar - Items 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, and 16 were approved as a block (motion by Commissioner Huey, second by Commissioner Hinohosa, unanimous roll call). Each item is a request for change of zoning with specific conditions where noted. - Item 5: 7701 Broadway Street – Change from C2 to IDZ2 (uses permitted in C2). 219 notices mailed, 1 in favor, 13 opposed. Oak Park Northwood in favor, San Antonio District 1 Residents Association gave no response. - Item 7: 3610 Speedway Run – Change from BP to I1S with specific use authorization for outside storage (screening required). Applicant agreed to condition: no outside storage of sand. 16 notices mailed, 0 in favor, 0 opposed. - Item 8: 5210 Sherry Ann Road – Change from R5 to C2 CD with conditional use for construction contractor facility (fence height up to 8 ft). 15 notices, 1 in favor, 0 opposed. - Item 9: 7271 Worspoke Road – Change from C2NA, C2, C3 to C3. 75 notices, 0 in favor, 0 opposed. - Item 10: 10781 South Samora Street – Change from FR to C2. 42 notices, 0 in favor, 0 opposed. - Item 12: 2747 South WW White Road – Change with specific use authorization for wireless communication system. Applicant amended property to 0.2837 acres. 24 notices, 0 in favor, 0 opposed. - Item 14: 1001 Capitol Avenue – Change from C3NA to R4 CD with conditional use for two dwelling units. 20 notices, 1 in favor, 0 opposed. Beacon Hill Area Neighborhood Association in favor. - Item 15: 731 East Nottingham Drive – Change from NP8 to NP8 CD with conditional use for two dwelling units. 35 notices, 4 in favor, 0 opposed. Oak Park Northwood Neighborhood Association in favor. - Item 16: 311 Howard Street – Change from C1 to C2. 33 notices, 0 in favor, 0 opposed. Tobin Hill Neighborhood Association and San Antonio District 1 Residents Association gave no response. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 5: Brooke Jones (President, Chateau Dijon Homeowners Association Board) submitted a voicemail expressing support for the zoning change, stating it does not impact their easement or cause concerns. - Item 14: Cynthia Walker (Chair, Beacon Hill Neighborhood Association Zoning Committee) submitted a voicemail in support, noting the down-zoning aligns with the Midtown Neighborhoods Plan. - Item 11 (continuance): Drea Garza (owner at Mayfair condominiums, 430 4th Drive) spoke in opposition to the zoning change to IDZ1 (no parking), citing negative impact on street parking. She supported the continuance for further dialogue. - Item 13 (continuance): Gwen van der Pool (speaker for item 13) was not present (called twice). - Item 11 (voicemail): Janice Clayton (resident at 2420 McCullough, Apt 202) opposed the zoning change, citing insufficient parking alternatives and negative effects on residents. - Item 11 (voicemail): Tony Garcia (on behalf of Monte Vista Historical Association) requested approval of continuance to allow applicant to address questions. Discussion Items - Item 3 (13406 Western Oak Dr): Request to change from C3NAS ERZD (specific use for electrical contractor) to C3NAS ERZD (specific use for construction contractor facility, screening required). Staff recommended denial, citing proximity to residential neighborhood and recommending C2 NACD as a buffer. The applicant (John Cooley) argued the use is consistent with existing commercial corridor. The site has been used similarly since 2001. No public comment. Staff noted the comprehensive plan (North Sector Plan, adopted 2010) designates the property as Suburban Tier, inconsistent with requested C3. The planning commission plan amendment hearing is set for March 25, 2026. Commissioner Duval raised concerns about the inconsistency affecting all similar lots. Commissioner Kelly made a motion to recommend approval with a friendly amendment by Commissioner Sipes to require downward facing lighting (accepted). Motion carried 11-0. - Item 6 (7D95 Hurman Road): Request to change from R20 (conditional use for assisted living, 16 residents) to C2 NA (conditional use for construction contractor facility). Staff recommended denial, noting the existing residential character would be diminished and industrial encroachment. The applicant (Gus Gonzalez) argued the property is surrounded by commercial/industrial uses and that a residential use is no longer viable. No public comment. Commissioner Kelly noted the area is in transition and that the property was already demolished. Commissioner Duval suggested reaching out to the adjacent Flores family. Motion to recommend approval (Commissioner Kelly, second by Commissioner Pete Rodriguez) carried 11-0. Key Outcomes - Consent Agenda Approved: Items 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16 recommended for City Council approval with a six-month window. - Continuances Granted: - Items 11, 13, 17, 18 continued to April 7, 2026 (motion by Commissioner Huey, second by Commissioner Kellum, unanimous). - Item 4 continued to April 21, 2026 (motion by Commissioner Losef, second by Commissioner Duval, unanimous). - Item 3 Approved: Recommended approval of rezoning with condition for downward facing lighting. - Item 6 Approved: Recommended approval of rezoning. - Minutes Approved: Minutes from the March 3, 2026 meeting approved as submitted by acclamation. - Director's Report: Announced a briefing on UDC amendments related to detention facilities will be added to the April 7, 2026 work session and public meeting. The voicemail system for public comment ends after this meeting, effective April 1, 2026.