Public Meetings - San Antonio, Texas

The San Antonio City Council held a budget hearing on August 20, 2025, focusing on the proposed fiscal year 2026 budgets for the Department of Strategic Services (homelessness) and the Neighborhood and Housing Services Department (NHSD), as well as the Animal Care Services (ACS) department. Presentations detailed current initiatives, spending, and outcomes, followed by extensive council discussion on long-term strategies, funding priorities, and service effectiveness. Homelessness and Housing Strategies - Marc Carmona, President and Director of the Department of Strategic Services, presented the homelessness budget. The department's proposed 2026 budget is $26.1 million, with $21.5 million already contracted, including 43 positions. Additional funds total $30.5 million for other services, bringing total homelessness-related spending to $26.2 million. - The city's low-barrier shelter (operated by SAM Ministries) has 185 rooms funded (out of 313 available), with a 90% occupancy rate. Since opening, 526 individuals have been served, 266 have moved to permanent housing, and approximately 200 have returned to the streets (negative exits). The average stay is 132 days, similar to national averages. - The city has removed over 1,300 encampments, costing about $2,000 per removal. 75% of encampments are concentrated in 10 locations. The department reported that 3,880 individuals have moved from streets to housing, and 2,070 have moved from housing to permanent housing. - Verónica García, Director of NHSD, presented the housing strategy. The 10-year SHIP plan aims to build or preserve 28,000 homes, with half for households earning less than 30% of area median income (about $26,000/year). The proposed 2026 budget for NHSD is $90.5 million, including $34 million for housing programs. This represents a reduction of $1 million from the previous year for minor home repairs, but the city is partnering with nonprofits to maintain service levels. - The city's housing bond (150 million) is supporting the preservation of over 500,000 homes, with nearly 1,500 affordable units. The average price of a bond-funded home is $170,000. Animal Care Services - John Gary, new director of ACS, presented the budget of $33 million with 245 positions. The department has doubled its field response capacity since 2019, with a 106% increase in investigations. Critical response times are meeting 70% of calls on time. - The department opened two new spay/neuter clinics this summer, performing over 500 surgeries and aiming for 6,000 next year. The save rate for dogs is 85% and for cats 90%, the highest in Texas. - The Pet Care Connect pilot program, operating in several districts, has reached over 4,000 homes and provided 1,400 pet care resources. The department also launched a marketing campaign that increased adoption interest by 90% through improved photos. Council Discussion and Questions - Council members expressed broad support for addressing homelessness and housing affordability but raised concerns about long-term sustainability. Council Member Mungía called for a five-year plan for the low-barrier shelter, noting that the current year-to-year lease is inefficient. The shelter's lease expires October 2025, and the property owner (Macomb) has not expressed interest in renewing. Council Member Mungía emphasized the need for a comprehensive strategy including transitional housing, mental health services, and addiction treatment. - Council Member White opposed the $4.8 million general fund allocation for the low-barrier shelter, arguing the results are mediocre and the city should focus on public safety and infrastructure. He questioned the cost per positive outcome (approximately $20,000 per person) and whether the shelter is serving primarily San Antonio residents. He noted that the city pays rent for 313 rooms but can only use 185, calling for a reevaluation of the program. - Council Member Castillo requested data on the cost of encampment removals, including police services, and asked for a breakdown of outcomes for those who leave the shelter. She also questioned the effectiveness of the outreach team's pay and retention, suggesting a pay differential for these workers. - Council Member Villagrán asked about the salary of outreach workers and supported a pay differential to retain staff. He also requested a comparison of the $1 million reduction in housing repair funds versus a $3.1 million increase for salaries elsewhere. - Council Member Spears emphasized the need for collaboration with the county on animal services and expressed concern about the low-barrier shelter's impact on families. She noted that 49% of first-time homeless individuals are victims of domestic violence and called for a more integrated approach with the county. - Council Member Castro praised the ACS team and asked about non-critical response times, noting that constituents in her district report dogs roaming for hours. She urged expanding the Pet Care Connect program and improving response to non-critical calls. - Council Member Galván highlighted the importance of the outreach team and asked about the city's income from animal bite cases. He also supported exploring a pay differential for outreach workers. - Council Member Sandoval asked about the long-term development of the low-barrier shelter and the city's coordination with the San Antonio Housing Trust. She also inquired about the number of youth experiencing homelessness and the possibility of a youth-specific shelter. - Council Member Alonso requested data on why people return to homelessness, noting that the city's system captures case notes but that the council needs better access to this information to evaluate program effectiveness. - Mayor Jones emphasized that the low-barrier shelter is not a sustainable long-term solution and directed staff to return with recommendations for a more comprehensive plan. She also noted that the city needs to prioritize between permanent housing, transitional housing, and other interventions. Key Outcomes - No formal votes were taken during this hearing; it was a budget work session. - Council members directed staff to: - Develop a long-term (5-year) plan for homelessness services, including the low-barrier shelter, transitional housing, and integration with mental health, addiction, and health services. - Explore pay differentials or salary adjustments for outreach workers to improve retention. - Provide data on encampment removal costs (including police), the origins of shelter residents, and detailed outcomes of shelter exits. - Report on the effectiveness of the low-barrier shelter and the Pet Care Connect pilot program. - Consider reallocating unused funds from the City's Affordable Housing Trust Fund (e.g., for lateral sewer connections or accessory dwelling units) and bring recommendations for future use. - Review the $1 million reduction in minor home repair funds and the impact on service levels. - The meeting was adjourned at 4:54 PM on August 20, 2025.

The Historic and Design Review Commission (HDRC) of San Antonio met on August 20, 2025, with all 11 commissioners present. The meeting was called to order at an unspecified afternoon time, a quorum was confirmed, and the commission proceeded to approve the August 6, 2025 meeting minutes unanimously. The agenda consisted of eight items, all initially placed on a consent agenda. After public comment, items 1 through 7 were approved unanimously with staff stipulations. Item 8 (1901 West V Satch Avenue) was pulled by a commissioner for separate discussion and subsequently approved unanimously with staff stipulations. Consent Calendar - Approval of August 6, 2025 Meeting Minutes: Motion carried unanimously (11 ayes). - Items 1–7: Approved unanimously with staff stipulations. These included addresses: 120 Callahan, 110 South Laredo, 205 West We Setz, 2011 West Summit, 1305 South St. Mary’s, 1932 West We Setch, and 2106 Steve’s. Certificates of appropriateness to be emailed within 10 days. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 4 (2011 West Summit Avenue, Case 2025-206): - Albert Martinez (neighbor) expressed full support for the proposed demolition and construction, citing the applicant’s responsible workmanship and coordination with the historic residence. - Betty Duchet (Conservation Society of San Antonio) voiced concern that the proposed accessory dwelling unit (ADU) is taller than the original landmark home and wider than the only other two-story ADU in the neighborhood. - Two additional neighbors (Mr. Rerer and Phil Tiharina) spoke in support of the garage apartment at the proposed height. - Robin Foster (Monticello Park Neighborhood Association Architectural Review Committee) stated the association generally supports the project but objects to the ADU height exceeding the primary residence, citing design guidelines requiring new structures to be visually subordinate. They recommended reducing the first-floor plate height. - Item 6 (1932 West Weatch Avenue, Case 2025-167): - Robin Foster (Monticello Park NA) noted the accessory structure’s unique orientation and scale, expressed regret over its loss, and believed it is worthy of rehabilitation or preservation of its original footprint. - Item 8 (1901 West V Satch Avenue, Case 2025-190): - Robert Sosedo (neighbor, 1902 West Summit) spoke in support of Mariana Pedrosa’s renovation, describing the property as a former site of drug activity and gang problems. He urged approval to encourage the owner and prevent a return to previous conditions. - Robin Foster (Monticello Park NA) submitted a detailed voicemail expressing concern about massing, scale, materials (metal roofing, stucco, vinyl siding), window patterns, porch design, and foundation treatment. They requested a redesign to better integrate the project into the historic district. Discussion Items - Item 8 (1901 West V Satch Avenue, Case 2025-190): Commissioner Savino pulled the item and asked the applicant, Mariana Pedrosa, to confirm she accepted staff stipulations and had addressed neighborhood concerns. Pedrosa stated she consented to all stipulations and had submitted updated plans. No further discussion occurred; a motion to approve with staff stipulations carried unanimously (11 ayes). Key Outcomes - Consent Agenda (Items 1–7): Approved with staff stipulations unanimously. - Item 8 (1901 West V Satch Avenue): Approved with staff stipulations unanimously after the applicant confirmed compliance. - Next Steps: Certificates of appropriateness to be emailed within 10 days. Permits must be obtained before any work begins.

The Historic Review Commission met on August 20, 2025, with a quorum present. The commission considered eight items on the consent agenda, with one item (1901 West WizH Avenue) pulled for separate discussion. Public comments were received via voicemail and in person from neighbors and representatives of community organizations. All items were approved with staff stipulations. Consent Calendar - Minutes from August 6, 2025, were approved unanimously. - Items 1 through 7 on the consent agenda were approved with staff stipulations. The addresses included: 120 Calahan, 120 Sur Laredo, 25 West WizH, 211 Summit, 1305 San Marys, 100 1932 WizH, and 2106 Stevens. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 4 (2011 West Summit Avenue): Multiple voicemails were received. Albert Martinez, a neighbor, expressed full support for demolition and new construction, praising the applicant's consideration for nearby residents. Barry Boucher, of the Conservation Society, voiced concern about the size of the proposed accessory unit, noting it would be taller than existing houses and exceed guidelines for subordinate structures. Ceutie Tijerina, a resident, supported the construction of an apartment above the garage. Robin Foster, representing the Monticello Park Association, generally supported the structure but recommended reducing the first-floor height so the accessory building would not be more prominent than the main house, citing standards 5AC1 and 5AC2. - Item 1907 WizH: Robin Foster, on behalf of the Monticello Park Architectural Review Committee, expressed regret over the potential loss of a historic rear structure and recommended rehabilitation or preservation of its original design for the future. - Item 8 (1901 West WizH Avenue): Robert Salcedo, a neighbor, spoke in favor of applicant Mariana Pedrosa's renovation, stating that the house had been in poor condition and thanking the city for helping resolve previous issues. He urged the commission to approve the request, emphasizing the owner's commitment. Blanca Manonado, of the Monticello Park Architectural Review Committee, expressed concerns about the design's appropriateness regarding size, elevations, architectural character, materials, and window styles. She recommended revisions to restore the structure's historic character, including appropriate wood finishes, foundation treatments, and square windows. Discussion Item: 1901 West WizH Avenue - The commission pulled this item from the consent agenda for separate consideration. The chair noted that the applicant had incorporated staff stipulations and reminded her to consider neighbor comments. The applicant, Mariana Pedrosa, attended and acknowledged the stipulations. A motion to approve with staff stipulations was made and seconded, with no further discussion. The motion passed unanimously. Key Outcomes - All consent agenda items (1–7) were approved unanimously (10-0 vote). - Item 8 (1901 West WizH Avenue) was approved unanimously with staff stipulations. - Applicants were directed to obtain their approval letters within 10 days and were reminded not to begin any work until all necessary permits were issued.

The City of San Antonio held a budget work session on August 19, 2025, from 2:00 PM to 5:19 PM, focusing on proposed fiscal year 2026 budgets for the Fire Department (SAFD), Police Department (SAPD), and Municipal Court. Mayor and Council reviewed staffing, response times, crime statistics, and initiatives. Public Comments & Testimony - Joe Jones, President of the San Antonio Firefighters Association, expressed concerns about rising response times (currently 8:26 minutes) and the need for a fourth shift to alleviate burnout and workload on firefighters, who work 56-hour weeks. He noted that squads help but are not sufficient and emphasized that a fourth shift would improve safety and reduce stress. Discussion Items - Fire Department (SAFD): Chief Frosto presented the proposed $443.6 million budget, including two new squad units (12 positions) to reduce response times at stations 10 and 21, a needs assessment ($1.4 million) for staffing, equipment, and facilities, and drone purchases ($291,000). Medical calls constitute 80% of incidents. Response times are slightly above the 8-minute benchmark. Reductions include $1 million in overtime management and line-item cuts without service impact. - Police Department (SAPD): Chief McManus presented the proposed $655.8 million budget, highlighting a 15.1% decrease in total reported crime year-to-date, continued addition of officers (25 in FY26, with a goal of 360 over 3-5 years to achieve 60% proactive patrol time), and infrastructure investments like the South Flores police station. Revenue enhancements include updated alarm permit fees. Reductions include overtime savings via shift restructuring and administrative adjustments. - Integrated Community Safety and SA CORE: Maria Vargas and Jesse Higgins reported on the violent crime reduction strategy, including hotspot policing (10% violent crime reduction), problem-oriented policing at specific apartment complexes, and the SA CORE program (4,486 mental health calls dispatched, only 1 arrest, 2,303 follow-up engagements). The Good Neighbor Program addresses chronic nuisance properties. - Municipal Court: Judge Obleto and Clerk Fred Garcia presented the proposed $13.9 million general fund budget. They highlighted specialty dockets (e.g., Road Ready, Community Court), juvenile diversion programs (371 youth participated), and procedural justice principles. Case filings are increasing. Municipal court handles Class C misdemeanors, code violations, and magistration services. - Councilmember Questions and Concerns: - Mayor requested data on medical incidents by age and geography, and analysis of fire department needs relative to downtown high-rise development. - Councilmember White and others advocated for funding 65 new police officers (current plan: 25) to reach patrol staffing goals faster, costing an additional $2.1 million in FY26. - Councilmember Castillo Angiano argued for investments in lighting over additional police, citing diminishing returns and a 30% safety improvement from lighting. - Councilmember Viagran raised dual magistration duplication and requested data from the court to counter the consultant's report. - Councilmember Galvan inquired about overtime drivers (minimum staffing and FLSA) and suggested increased staffing could reduce overtime costs long-term. - Councilmember Core emphasized the need for innovative enforcement for speeding and quality-of-life issues, not just patrol expansion. - Councilmember Mungia asked about proactive time documentation and the impact of specialized units (SA CORE, SAFE) on patrol workload. - Councilmember Spears supported the needs assessment and highlighted the potential of MIH and fourth shift discussions. Key Outcomes - SAFD Needs Assessment Approved for Funding: The $1.4 million comprehensive assessment will proceed, focusing on staffing, equipment, and facilities to guide future investments. - Police Officer Addition Debated: While the proposed budget includes 25 new patrol officers, several councilmembers pushed for increasing to 65 at an additional $2.1 million; Mayor directed staff to provide more data on staffing analysis and proactive time metrics. - Follow-Up Items: City Manager Eric Walsh committed to providing a follow-up memo by Friday close of business, including: - Breakdown of crime reduction by council district. - Data on medical incident demographics for fire department. - Analysis of officer per capita compared to other Texas cities. - Briefing on dual magistration process with municipal court. - Information on AI technology prototypes and privacy protections. - Future Briefings: Council will receive a briefing on magistration efficiency and the AI pilot before final budget action.

On August 19, 2025, the San Antonio City Council held a budget session focusing on the Fire Department (SAFD), Police Department (SAPD), and Municipal Court. Presentations covered proposed FY2026 budgets, staffing, response times, and public safety strategies. Council members discussed adding 65 police officers, a fire needs assessment, drone technology, and court efficiency. No formal votes were taken, but consensus emerged to prioritize funding for additional officers and evaluate service gaps. Fire Department Presentation - Chief Chris Frost presented a proposed FY2026 budget of $443.6 million. The department has approximately 1,900 uniformed and 129 civilian employees across 54 stations. - Medical calls account for 80% of incidents; average response time is 8 minutes 40 seconds, slightly above the target. - Initiatives include adding two squads at stations 10 and 21 (operational July 2026), purchasing drones ($291,000), and a comprehensive needs assessment ($1.4 million) to address staffing, facilities, and equipment gaps. - Cost drivers: 8% salary increase from collective bargaining and a contract with UT Health Science. Overtime reductions of $1 million and civilian position cuts are proposed without impacting service. - New fire stations 52 and 53 are being built; stations 21, 33, and 10 are in design phases. Police Department Presentation - Chief McManis reported a proposed budget of $72.8 million (plus $630 million from general fund, arrest center, and restricted funds). The department has 2,893 uniformed officers, 141 park police, 44 airport police, and 992 civilians. - Crime statistics for January–July 2025 show total crime down 9% (crimes against persons) and 19% (crimes against society). Property crime also decreased. Arrests increased to nearly 46,000 in 2024–2025. - Response times: emergency calls under 6 minutes; non-emergency calls 19 minutes. Goal is 18 minutes by 2026. - Staffing: 65 vacancies currently. A staffing study recommended adding 360 officers over 3–5 years to achieve a 60% proactive patrol / 40% call-response ratio. Currently at 49% patrol time. - Initiatives: 25 new detectives for domestic violence, 24 sworn officers on traffic, real-time crime center, body cameras with AI video analysis, and a south-side substation (opening spring 2027). - Proposed revenue: increasing commercial and residential permit fees, and raising the officer escort fee from $1.50 to $10.00. - Key request: Adding 40 officers in FY2026 would cost $2.1 million; 65 officers total would cost $5.9 million in FY2027. Council members expressed strong support for funding the full 65 officers. Municipal Court Presentation - Judge Carla Obledo and Secretary Fred Garcia presented a proposed FY2026 budget of $16.8 million (down from $14.1 million in FY2025?). Funding comes from general fund ($13.9 million) and a $14 fee distributed among three restricted funds. - The court handles misdemeanors (traffic, animal cruelty, code violations) with a focus on procedural justice and alternatives to incarceration. Specialized dockets include youth driving, homelessness, and animal care. - Juvenile case management: 92% of high school students remained enrolled after court intervention. Truancy prevention programs are active. - Magistrate duties: probable cause determinations for all arrests, informing defendants of rights, and setting bail. The court noted a dual-magistrate process with the county, which may create inefficiencies. - Fine collections: $180,000 uncollected in criminal cases and over $1 million in civil cases. Council members raised concerns about repeat offenders and code enforcement. Discussion and Council Comments - Council members widely praised the presentations and emphasized public safety as a top priority. Several members (Viagrán, Spears, Mesa González, Munguía, Castillo, and others) explicitly supported adding 65 police officers to meet the 60–40 patrol ratio. - Council member Castillo questioned the ROI of adding officers vs. investing in lighting and other preventive measures. He also raised privacy concerns about drone and AI technology. - Council member Galván highlighted the need for expanded mental health services and coordination with Bexar County. - Council member White and others stressed the importance of retention incentives and state-level support for officers. - The fire department’s squads were praised for reducing call volumes on high-demand engines. The president of the firefighters’ association advocated for a fourth platoon to reduce overtime and stress. - Mayor Jones requested a written summary from police on addressing community concerns, and a follow-up meeting on magistrate efficiency. Key Outcomes - Consensus to fund 65 new police officers (40 in FY2026 at $2.1M, 25 more in FY2027 at $5.9M) to move toward the 60–40 patrol ratio. Council will restructure the budget around this priority. - The fire department’s needs assessment, squads, and drone program received support. The assessment will inform future station and staffing plans. - Municipal court will provide additional data on case dismissals and magistrate process efficiency. The mayor will engage with Bexar County to reduce dual-magistrate duplication. - Staff will provide follow-up information by Friday, August 22, 2025, including a list of community organizations receiving city funds for court-related services.

The San Antonio Zoning Committee held a regular hearing on August 19, 2025, at 1:11 PM, chaired by John Bustamante (District 5). The committee considered 13 zoning cases, including consent items and four individual hearings. Key decisions included approval of a professional office with modified hours, continuation of a single-family development and a transitional housing project for further community outreach, and approval of alcohol sales at a restaurant. The meeting also included a director's report on staff promotions. Consent Calendar - Cases 1, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, and 13 were approved unanimously on a single motion. These items involved various zoning changes, including a two-unit development at 157 West Parkway Drive, a zoning change at 107 Cash Street, a solar use at 8800 Marback Road, a food establishment at 530 Courtland Place, a development at 1002 Street, a 12-unit development at 604 West Hollywood Avenue, a change at 4130 Broadway Street, and a professional office at 1535 Hill Crest Drive. Notifications were sent, and no opposition was recorded for most. Specific details: 71 notifications for case 5 (1 favor, 2 opposed), 20 notifications for case 7 (all in support), 30 notifications for case 9 (2 in favor, neighborhood support), 19 notifications for case 11 (Lincoln Park supporting). Public Comments & Testimony - Case 3 (4211 Boxwood Rd): Several residents opposed the rezoning. Ray Shepherd objected, citing past problems, increased traffic, and negative impacts. Another resident (name not fully captured) protested, stating property values would drop and construction issues. Heather Willems opposed, citing commercial activity causing problems (e.g., water cut off). Another resident, Ríos, protested due to the applicant's past improper work (paving without permit). - Case 10 (334 Como Ave): Edmund Stewart opposed, fearing increased danger from wandering individuals. Patricia Dux (via her daughter) expressed fear for elderly residents, citing existing issues with homeless individuals. Daisy Ted Leroy, a lifelong resident, opposed, wanting peace and no intrusions. Armand Hathaway (president of neighborhood association) and Will Kellington spoke against, citing the area's historic significance (first African American suburb) and concerns about safety for elderly residents. Donna Covington also opposed. Discussion Items - Case 2 (1900 block Houston St): Request to rezone from C-2 to MR-6 for a professional office (notary public). The applicant, Reina Sens, proposed hours of 10 AM to 3 PM to avoid traffic. Commissioner Chase suggested extended hours (9:30 AM to 4:30 PM) to allow more flexibility. Staff confirmed conditions: no additional signage, must maintain residential character, and office hours limited to 7 AM to 6 PM. The applicant agreed to the amended hours. Parking was confirmed on-site (gravel area for three cars). The motion to approve with the amended hours passed unanimously. - Case 3 (4211 Boxwood Rd): Request to rezone from single-family to R-6 for three single-family lots (originally two lots). The applicant's representative, Elizabeth Russell, explained the owner wants to build three single-family homes, remove a metal structure, and eventually live on the property. Commissioner Hinojosa noted concerns about opposition and suggested community outreach. After discussion, the committee voted to continue the case to September 2, 2025, to allow the applicant to engage with neighbors. Motion passed unanimously. - Case 6 (318 Historic Cold Highway): Request to rezone from C-2 to allow alcohol sales (beer with food) at a restaurant. The applicant, Humberto Yell, described plans for a family restaurant with beer sales only with food, no live music, existing hours (10 AM weekdays, 11 PM weekends). Staff recommended denial due to inconsistency with the corridor plan. However, the neighborhood association and nearby businesses supported the request. The committee approved the rezoning, with Commissioner Hinojosa noting the importance of supporting small businesses. Motion passed unanimously. - Case 10 (334 Como Ave): Request for a conditional use to allow a transitional housing facility for foster youth (ages 18-24) for up to 8 residents. The applicant, Mr. Ryles, described the program (Coder Housing) providing support, skill training, and mentorship. Current zoning allows 6 residents; the request is for 8. Many neighbors opposed, citing safety concerns, existing issues with homeless and crime, and the area's elderly population. The committee discussed the need for community engagement. Commissioner Chase moved to continue to September 2, 2025, to allow the applicant to meet with neighbors and address concerns. The motion passed unanimously. Key Outcomes - Vote on Consent Calendar: Motion to approve cases 1, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, and 13 passed unanimously (Commissioners Calom, Hinojosa, Reyes, Wait, Check, and Bustamante all voted yes). - Case 2 Approved: Motion by Commissioner Chase, seconded by Commissioner Hinojosa, to approve case 2 with amended hours of 9:30 AM to 4:30 PM. Vote: 8-0 (all present). - Case 3 Continued: Motion by Commissioner Hinojosa to continue case 3 to September 2, 2025. Vote: 8-0. - Case 6 Approved: Motion by Commissioner Barros, seconded by Commissioner Hinojosa, to approve case 6. Vote: 8-0. - Case 10 Continued: Motion by Commissioner Chase, seconded by Commissioner Barros, to continue case 10 to September 2, 2025. Vote: 8-0. - Minutes Approval: Minutes from August 5, 2025, were approved unanimously. Director's Report - Director announced the creation of a new Capital Budget Department, with Michael Shannon as director. Tomás (former director) promoted to director, and Assistant Ramirez promoted to oversee field projects. Logan Spiel promoted to assistant director for land development. Commissioner Reyes was recognized for his service and is leaving the committee.

The San Antonio Zoning Commission met on August 19, 2025, at 1:01 PM, chaired by John Bustamante. The commission considered 13 zoning items, including a consent agenda and several individual hearings. Key decisions included approval of a consent agenda (with one item pulled), approval of a zoning amendment for a professional office, continuance of two items for neighborhood outreach, and approval of a request to allow alcohol sales at a restaurant. The meeting adjourned at 2:33 PM. Consent Calendar - The consent agenda included items 1, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, and 13. Item 3 was pulled for individual consideration. All consent items were approved unanimously (8-0). - Item 1: 157 West Broadview Drive – Rezone from R5 to IDZ1 (12 units). 16 notices sent, 0 in favor, 0 opposed. Woodlawn Hills Neighborhood Association gave no response. - Item 4: 107 Cass Street – Rezone from I-1 to IDZ1 (MF18 uses). 44 notices, 1 favor, 1 opposed. Devon Heights did not respond. - Item 5: 8800 block Marbach Road – Rezone from C2/C2NA/C3/C2S to C2S with specific use authorization for solar battery storage. 71 notices, 1 favor, 2 opposed. Rainbow Hills Area Neighborhood Association gave no response. - Item 7: 530 East Courtland Place – Rezone from R5 CD to R5 CD IDZ with conditional use for food service. 29 notices, 2 favor, 1 opposed. Tobin Hill Neighborhood Association in support. - Item 8: (Not fully described in transcript but listed as 46 notices sent, 0 favor, 1 opposed; West N Hope in Action and Martinez Creek Neighborhood Association gave no response; Prospect Hill Neighborhood Association in favor.) - Item 9: 604 West Hollywood Avenue – Rezone from R6 to R6 CD for two dwelling units. 38 notices, 2 favor, 0 opposed. Beacon Hill Neighborhood Association in support. - Item 11: 4130 Broadway Street – Rezone from C2 to C2 IDZ. 19 notices, 0 favor, 1 opposed. Mankey Park in support. - Item 12: (Not fully described, but 21 notices sent, 0 favor, 0 opposed, no neighborhood association within 200 feet.) - Item 13: 1422 State Highway 16 North – Rezone from FR to BP. 17 notices, 0 favor, 0 opposed, no neighborhood association. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 3 (4211 Boxwood Road): Multiple voicemails opposed the rezoning, citing concerns about property values, past issues with the owner (unpermitted construction, unkept property), and fear of increased traffic. Speakers expressed that the property should remain as-is. - Item 7 (530 East Courtland Place): Betty Boucher, representing the Conservation Society of San Antonio, requested postponement to allow the Tobin Hill Community Association to receive notification and provide comments. - Item 9 (604 West Hollywood Avenue): Cynthia Walker, chair of the Beacon Hill Neighborhood Association, spoke in support, stating that the neighborhood association voted unanimously on August 11, 2025, to approve the zoning change, which would correct a non-performing property with two existing units. - Item 10 (334 Como Avenue): - Emma Schuller (voicemail) opposed the change, citing concerns about existing group homes causing disturbances (people knocking on doors, unsafe conditions). - Alba C. Warner (on behalf of Patricia Dukes) opposed, describing issues with a nearby group home for elderly residents (wheelchair users in the street, homeless people knocking). - Daisy V. Lewis (resident at 338 Como) opposed, wanting to live in peace without intruders. - Armand Hathaway, president of the Coliseum Willow Park Neighborhood Association, opposed, stating that the neighborhood (historic, with many original owners) does not want a boarding house. He cited lack of communication and clarity about the program. - Will Covington (resident at 574 Como) opposed, noting an influx of investors converting homes into group homes, leading to nuisances. - Donna Covington opposed, echoing concerns. Discussion Items - Item 2 (2634 East Houston Street): Applicant Raina Sims sought to rezone from R4 to C1 for a tax/notary office. She amended the request to RM6 with conditional use for professional office, with hours 10 AM–3 PM by appointment. Commissioners discussed hours; Commissioner Chase suggested 9:30 AM–4:30 PM to allow flexibility. Staff noted that under RM6 CD, default hours are 7 AM–6 PM, but the applicant agreed to the narrower range. The commission approved the amended request. - Item 3 (4211 Boxwood Road): Applicant Elizabeth Russell represented the owner, who wants to subdivide two lots into three single-family homes. The original request was for R6 CD with two dwelling units per lot, but the applicant amended to R6 (no conditional use) after Commissioner Hinojosa clarified that R6 would allow three single-family homes without a site plan binding. Neighbors voiced opposition via voicemail. The commission continued the item to September 2, 2025, to allow the applicant to conduct outreach with neighbors. - Item 6 (318 Historic Old Highway 90): Applicant Mr. Leal requested a rezone from C2NA (no alcohol sales) to C2 to allow beer sales with food at an existing restaurant. The restaurant is in a non-alcoholic sales corridor established in 2011. Staff recommended denial, citing inconsistency with the corridor. The applicant noted support from Los Jardines Neighborhood Association and offered to hire a security officer on weekends. The commission approved the request (8-0). - Item 10 (334 Como Avenue): Applicant Mr. Rouse sought a rezone from R4 to R4 CD for a boarding home for 8 young adults (ages 18–23) from foster care, providing supervised independent living. The property is currently vacant. Staff recommended approval, noting the property has an accessory dwelling and is near transit. Neighbors spoke in opposition, expressing concerns about safety, existing group home issues, and lack of communication. The applicant clarified that by right he could house 6 residents; the rezone would allow 8. The commission continued the item to September 2, 2025, for the applicant to meet with neighbors and address concerns. Key Outcomes - Consent Agenda: Approved (8-0). - Item 2 (2634 East Houston Street): Approved as amended to RM6 with conditional use for professional office, with hours 9:30 AM–4:30 PM (8-0). - Item 3 (4211 Boxwood Road): Continued to September 2, 2025, for neighborhood outreach (8-0). - Item 6 (318 Historic Old Highway 90): Approved as submitted (8-0). - Item 10 (334 Como Avenue): Continued to September 2, 2025, for applicant to meet with neighbors (8-0). - Minutes: Approved (acclamation). Director's Report & Announcements - Staff announced departmental changes: Michael Shannon is leaving DSD to become director of a new capital budget projects department; Amin Tomaz will become director; Melissa Ramirez is promoted to deputy director; Logan Sparrow is promoted to assistant director. - Chair Bustamante thanked Commissioner Reyes for his service, as he is leaving the commission.

The Zoning Board of Adjustments of San Antonio, Texas, met on August 18, 2025, beginning at 1:01 PM. The meeting was presided over by Chair Oren, with commissioners present including Osuna, Mena, Barrington, Stevens, Ibañez, Dean, Cruz, Brackman, Benavides (arriving late and departing early), Bonillas (joining digitally), and Berndon. A quorum of nine members was established. The board heard and voted on ten agenda items, including appeals of short-term rental (STR) permit revocations, special exceptions for STRs, variance requests, and an appeal regarding a non-conforming use. Calendar Item 1: Continuance - A motion was made and seconded to continue Case BOA 23103014 (Sergio de la Mora, 626 Fulton) to September 22, 2025. The continuance was approved. The case involves variances for an accessory structure and building height. Calendar Item 2: Appeal of STR Permit Revocation – 5454 Vista Trail - Case: BOA 251030128, requested by Anthony Sul. The appeal challenged the city's revocation of a Type 2 short-term rental permit for failure to report and pay Hotel Occupancy Tax (HOT) from April 2024 to February 2025. - Staff Position: Recommended denial, citing 37 notices sent (three in favor, two opposed; Vista Neighbor Association opposed). The applicant's father, Alex Zully, represented the absentee applicant, stating that notifications went to a spam folder and no physical certified letter was received at the property address. Staff noted that 37 email notifications had been sent and that a certified letter was sent to the property address (5454 Vista Trail). - Public Comment: None. - Motion: Commissioner Osuna moved to grant the appeal, finding that the city made an error in revoking the permit due to a lack of communication. He noted that there was no opposition from neighbors and that the issue was limited to tax reporting. - Vote: 6 in favor (Osuna, Stevens, Ibañez, Brackman, Bonillas, Chair Oren), 4 opposed (Mena, Barrington, Dean, Cruz), 1 abstention (Benavides). The motion failed (6–4–1). The permit revocation stands. The applicant may reapply after one year from July 1, 2025. Calendar Item 3: Special Exception for Type 2 STR – 1031 South Gabriel Street - Case: BOA 251030135, requested by Shivani Brady. The property is located in District 2. The block already has four STR units (one active Type 2 at 1023 South Gavins). The applicant requested an additional Type 2 STR permit; the block limit is 21 units. Currently, 21.43% of the block is STRs; the cap is 25%. - Staff Position: Recommended denial. 39 notices sent; zero in favor, zero opposed. The Denver Heights Neighborhood Association responded in opposition. No other neighborhood association responded. - Applicant Testimony: Gina Ready (co-owner) explained that she purchased the property with a friend to operate as an Airbnb. She stated they did not know about the density cap and have been working to comply. She said they contacted the Denver Heights Neighborhood Association but received no response. They also attempted a long-term rental but could not find tenants. - Public Comment: None. - Outcome: The board voted to continue the case to September 22, 2025, to allow the applicant to engage with the Denver Heights Neighborhood Association and seek their support. The motion passed with one opposed (Commissioner Dean). Calendar Item 4: Appeal of STR Permit Revocation – 1323 Lost Lake Drive - Case: BOA 251030132, requested by Alejandra Ceballos. The appeal challenged the city's revocation for failure to pay HOT from February to June 2025. - Staff Position: Recommended denial. 31 notices sent; two in favor, none opposed. No neighborhood association is in the area. The applicant's taxes are currently current as of August 2025. - Applicant Testimony: Ms. Ceballos stated that she is a first-time STR operator. She believed a third-party vendor (Avenue) was paying taxes on her behalf via Airbnb, but there was confusion about the payment portal. She acknowledged the error and has since paid all outstanding taxes. - Public Comment: None. - Motion: Commissioner Cruz moved to grant the appeal, finding that the city made an error in revoking the permit because the applicant is the only STR on the block, her taxes are now current, and the confusion was a first-time mistake. - Vote: 9 in favor, 2 opposed (Commissioners Dean and Mena). The motion passed. Calendar Item 5: Appeal of Denial of Non-Conforming Use – 1139 New Laredo Highway - Case: BOA 251030122, requested by Carlos Jiménez. The appeal challenged the city's refusal to recognize a non-conforming use for motor vehicle sales and full-service repair on a property zoned C2 and C3. The property is split-zoned: the front is C3 (vehicle sales and service allowed by right) and the rear is C2 (vehicle sales not allowed). The applicant had obtained a Certificate of Occupancy in January 2023 for a 12-foot by 12-foot structure on the C3 portion of the property. - Staff Position: Recommended denial. 22 notices sent; 31 signatures in favor, zero opposed. The Quintana Community Neighborhood Association did not respond. - Applicant Testimony: Mr. Jiménez stated he purchased the property in February 2022, invested his life savings, and received a Certificate of Occupancy in January 2023 for vehicle sales and full-service repair. He obtained 31 signatures from neighbors supporting his business, which he says has reduced crime (drugs, homelessness) in the area. - Public Comment: None. - Motion: Commissioner Mena moved to deny the appeal, stating that a non-conforming use is not the correct avenue; the proper path is a zoning change (rezoning) for the C2 portion of the property. - Vote: 8 in favor of granting the appeal (Stevens, Dean, Cruz, Brackman, Benavides, Osuna, Bonillas, Chair Oren), 3 opposed (Mena, Barrington, Ibañez). The motion to grant failed (8–3 in favor, but a 75% supermajority of the total board – 9 votes – is required to pass an appeal; 8 fell short). The applicant was directed to seek a zoning change through the Zoning Commission. Calendar Item 6: Variance Request – 800 East Gunter Street - Case: BOA 251030125, requested by Jason Gallardo (Cody Pools) for Kathleen and Rolf Loubordy. The property is in the King William Historic District. The applicant sought three variances: (1) 2'5" from the 5' minimum side setback for a swimming pool (proposed 2'7" water's edge to property line); (2) 13'5" from the 20' minimum driveway setback (proposed 6'7" from garage entrance); and (3) 3'6" from the 15' minimum clear vision area at the garage entrance. - Staff Position: Recommended approval. 32 notices sent; two in favor, zero opposed. The King William Neighborhood Association opposed variance 1 (pool setback). The San Antonio Neighborhood Association did not respond. - Applicant Testimony: Mr. Gallardo explained that the pool construction began with a valid permit issued in May 2025, but during a June 2025 inspection, the pool was found to be non-compliant with the 5-foot side setback. He stated that the pool design (depth transitions) makes it impossible to meet the 5-foot setback without significant rework. - Public Comment: None. - Motion: Commissioner Osuna moved to grant all three variances, with specific findings: (1) the variances do not impact the clear vision area or safe ingress/egress; (2) literal enforcement would create an unnecessary hardship due to the property's constraints (Garage on Gunter Street, limited clear vision area); (3) no significant intrusion into the right-of-way; (4) no authorization of uses not permitted in the district; (5) the pool does not encroach on shared property lines, and the existing fence and garage do not obstruct clear vision for traffic. - Vote: Unanimous approval (all commissioners present). Calendar Item 7: Variance Request – 508 Haltsdrave - Case: BOA 251030129, requested by Vanessa Rubio. The property is located in District 5, zoned R4. The applicant sought a variance of 3'4" from the 5' minimum side setback to allow a principal structure with a 1'8" side setback. The house is being rebuilt on existing foundations that were originally built before current setback requirements. The expansion (10' x 20' addition) triggered full code compliance, including side setbacks. - Staff Position: Recommended approval. 36 notices sent; one in favor (property owner), zero opposed. The Tierra Linda Neighborhood Association opposed. - Applicant Testimony: Ms. Rubio stated that she purchased the property from her father in 2023. The existing foundation dates from the original home, built in 1965, which had reduced side setbacks. She is reusing the foundation and adding a rear addition. She stated she had not contacted the neighborhood association directly. - Public Comment: None. - Motion: Commissioner Brackman moved to grant the variance, with findings that sufficient space remains for maintenance and fire safety, and that the reduced setback is consistent with the character of the neighborhood, where many houses have similar setbacks. The addition does not impede access for emergency vehicles or maintenance. - Vote: Unanimous approval. Calendar Item 8: Variance Request – 150 Stonewood Drive - Case: BOA 251030130, requested by Kim C. Jones. The applicant initially sought a variance to convert an open carport into an enclosed garage, but during discussion it became clear that the structure was closer than 25 feet from the property line (a requirement for garages) and would also need a variance for the side setback. The applicant indicated a desire to keep the walls (making it a garage) rather than an open carport. - Staff Position: The staff recommended approval only for the carport structure as an open structure, not for a garage. - Applicant Testimony: Mr. Jones, a 33-year resident, stated he had waited 20 years to do this project. He wanted to use the existing foundation and structure. He expressed a preference for an enclosed garage but was willing to remove the two walls to keep it an open carport if necessary. - Public Comment: None. - Outcome: The board determined that a vote on the carport variance was possible, but the applicant requested a continuance to consider the garage option. The board continued the case to September 8, 2025, with an additional $200 fee. The applicant agreed to pay the fee. Calendar Item 9: Variance Request – 207 Helena Street - Case: BOA 251030131, requested by Armando Certuche. The property is located in District 5, zoned R6 (minimum lot size 6,000 sq ft). The lot is 3,870 sq ft. The applicant sought a variance of 2,130 sq ft from the minimum lot size requirement to allow the redevelopment of a single-family home built in 1930 on a substandard lot. The home was to be demolished and rebuilt with the same footprint and setbacks, including a front setback of 10 feet, side setbacks of 5 feet, and a rear setback of 25 feet. - Staff Position: Recommended denial, citing the precedent such a variance would set and the availability of a zoning change. - Applicant Testimony: The applicant's daughter explained that the property has been in the family since 1930 and was never subdivided. They were told to seek a variance instead of a rezoning. They are willing to pursue a zoning change if necessary. - Public Comment: One neighbor, Vanessa Richard Maldonado (living at 215 Helena Street), expressed concern about the size of the new home, privacy, and emergency vehicle access. She stated the current home on the lot is small and a larger home would block light and air. The board noted that the proposed setbacks meet R6 requirements except for lot size. - Motion: Commissioner Stevens moved to grant the variance, with findings that literal enforcement would cause an unnecessary hardship due to the lot's substandard size, which prevents any redevelopment under current zoning. The proposed home meets all other setback requirements. The variance will not authorize uses not permitted in the district. - Vote: Unanimous approval. Calendar Item 10: Variance Request – 1926 Rail Drive - Case: BOA 251030133, requested by Mark Hill (representing Mr. Mollens). The property is in District 10, zoned for industrial use. The applicant sought a variance of 4'6" from the 30-foot minimum front setback to allow a front setback of 25'6", limited to the 100-foot width of the building. A commercial building permit was issued in October 2023, but the reduced setback was not identified during technical review. - Staff Position: Recommended approval. 12 notices sent; one in favor (adjacent property to the north), zero opposed. - Applicant Testimony: Mr. Hill stated the building is already constructed. Correcting the setback now would be very costly. The building is on an irregularly shaped lot in an industrial area, and the reduced setback does not affect adjacent properties. - Public Comment: None. - Motion: Commissioner Brackman moved to grant the variance, with findings that it is not contrary to the public interest, the irregular lot shape creates a unique difficulty, and the reduced setback is limited to a small fraction of the frontage. - Vote: Unanimous approval. Key Outcomes - Appeal 5454 Vista Trail: Denied (6–4–1). Permit revocation stands. Applicant may reapply after one year. - Appeal 1323 Lost Lake Drive: Granted (9–2). Permit reinstated with original expiration date (April 11, 2027). - Appeal 1139 New Laredo Highway: Denied (8–3 in favor, but fell short of the required 9-vote supermajority). Applicant directed to seek zoning change. - Variance 800 E. Gunter Street: All three variances granted (unanimous). - Variance 508 Haltsdrave: Granted (unanimous). - Variance 150 Stonewood Drive: Continued to September 8, 2025, with additional fee. - Variance 207 Helena Street: Granted (unanimous). - Variance 1926 Rail Drive: Granted (unanimous). - Director's Report: Announced the departure of Mike Shannon, who will become director of the new Capital Delivery Department (bond projects). Leticia (interim director) will remain. Commissioner Mena noted his reappointment to the Zoning Commission. The meeting adjourned at 3:46 PM.

The San Antonio Board of Adjustments convened on August 18, 2025, at 10:01 AM with a quorum of nine members present. The board heard ten items, including variances, appeals of short‑term rental permit revocations, a special exception request, and a non‑conforming use denial. Several decisions resulted in continuances, while others were voted up or down. Consent Calendar - The board unanimously approved the minutes from the previous meeting without corrections. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 9 (207 Helena Street): Neighbor Vanessa Maldonado expressed concerns about the proposed new home’s size, privacy, emergency vehicle access, and property values. The applicant stated the new structure would remain within the same footprint as the existing 1930 house, meeting all setbacks. - No other public comments were made on other items. Discussion Items - BOA‑25‑1030114 (626 Fulton Ave) – Variance for accessory structure. The applicant requested a continuance to September 22, 2025, to work with his engineer. The board granted the continuance unanimously. - BOA‑25‑1030128 (5454 Vista Trail) – Appeal of STR permit revocation due to delinquent hotel occupancy tax. The applicant’s parents argued emails went to spam and letters were not received; staff noted both email and mailed notices were sent. The motion to grant the appeal failed (6 in favor, 4 against, 1 abstention) because 75% approval (9 votes) was required. - BOA‑25‑1030135 (1031 S Givers St) – Special exception for an additional STR on a blockface already at 25% capacity (one existing STR). The applicant sought time to contact the neighborhood association. The board continued the matter to September 22, 2025 (9‑1 in favor, Commissioner Dean opposed). - BOA‑25‑1030132 (13223 Lost Lake Dr) – Appeal of STR permit revocation. The applicant explained confusion over tax remittance and paid all outstanding amounts after receiving the revocation notice. Staff confirmed no other code violations. The board granted the appeal 9‑2. - BOA‑25‑1030122 (1139 New Laredo Hwy) – Appeal of non‑conforming use denial for auto sales. The applicant built a service garage on a C2‑zoned portion where auto sales are not permitted. Staff found the use was never lawfully established. The motion to grant the appeal failed (8 in favor, 3 against; 75% requirement not met). The applicant may pursue a zoning change. - BOA‑25‑1030125 (800 E Gunther St) – Variances for swimming pool setback, garage entry setback, and driveway clear vision area in the King William Historic District. Staff recommended approval. The board granted all three variances unanimously. - BOA‑25‑1030129 (508 Elk Dr) – Variance for side setback to reconstruct a home on the original footprint. Staff recommended approval. The board granted the variance unanimously. - BOA‑25‑1030130 (150 Storywood Dr) – Variance for carport side setback. The applicant initially sought a carport but later expressed desire for a garage, which would require additional variances. The board continued the case to September 8, 2025, with a $200 postponement fee. - BOA‑25‑1030131 (207 Helena St) – Variance from minimum 6,000 sq ft lot size to allow development on a 3,870 sq ft lot. Public comment raised concerns, but the board found the lot was substandard historically. The variance was granted unanimously. - BOA‑25‑1030133 (11926 Rail Dr) – Variance for front setback due to an error in the city’s review of building permits. The board granted the variance unanimously. Key Outcomes | Item | Case Number | Decision | Vote | |------|------------|----------|------| | 1 | 25‑1030114 | Continued to Sept 22, 2025 | Unanimous | | 2 | 25‑1030128 | Appeal denied (revocation stands) | 6‑4‑1 (failed) | | 3 | 25‑1030135 | Continued to Sept 22, 2025 | 9‑1 | | 4 | 25‑1030132 | Appeal granted (permit reinstated) | 9‑2 | | 5 | 25‑1030122 | Appeal denied | 8‑3 (failed to reach 9) | | 6 | 25‑1030125 | Variances granted | Unanimous | | 7 | 25‑1030129 | Variance granted | Unanimous | | 8 | 25‑1030130 | Continued to Sept 8, 2025 | Unanimous | | 9 | 25‑1030131 | Variance granted | Unanimous | | 10 | 25‑1030133 | Variance granted | Unanimous | Director’s Report - Staff announced leadership changes: Michael Shannon will move to the new Capital Delivery Department; Amin Tamez becomes Director of Development Services; Gabriel (the deputy director) will shift to Code Enforcement and Field Services. All changes take effect October 1, 2025. - The board was reminded to contact council offices regarding reappointments. The meeting adjourned at 3:46 PM.