Public Meetings - San Antonio, Texas

The San Antonio Planning Commission met on March 25, 2026, at 2:00 PM. The meeting included a consent agenda and a public hearing on an appeal of a staff denial of a certificate of determination for a duplex property at 439 Barrel Place. Consent Calendar - The commission approved the consent agenda unanimously, which included item 10: a resolution to amend the North Sector Plan, changing a property's designation from C3 to a designation consistent with the original plan to allow larger commercial and hospital uses. Staff reported 32 notifications with no support or opposition and no HOA response. The motion passed. Appeal Hearing: Item 11 – Appeal of Certificate of Determination Denial for 439 Barrel Place - Background: The property is an existing duplex on two lots at 439 Barrel Place. The owner applied for permits for water, drainage, and electrical services and a building permit. Staff denied the application based on Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 35-430, arguing the property did not qualify for an exception because it was not a single lot and lacked evidence of five years of continuous service. - Appellant's Position: Jimmy Leo, representing the owner, argued that the property qualifies for exceptions under UDC 35-430 C16 (for repairs and maintenance) and that the existing duplex has been operating for over 80 years. He contended that staff erred by not recognizing the nonconforming rights and that the application should be approved to allow necessary electrical panel repairs. - Staff Position: Planner Klingua explained that the application as submitted requested new utility connections and building permits, which did not meet the exceptions. Staff offered that the owner could submit a new application for a repair-only permit under a different exception. - CPS Energy Representative: Confirmed that there are two active electric meters at the property and no objection to the permit request. - Discussion: Commissioners questioned the scope of the application and whether the true need was only an electrical repair. Commissioners noted that the application included requests for new water and drainage services, which triggered lot review. The appellant acknowledged frustration but maintained that staff should have determined the correct exception. - Outcome: A motion to uphold staff's denial was made and passed. The commission sustained the denial, but staff indicated the owner could reapply for a repair-only permit. Key Outcomes - Consent agenda approved. - Appeal denial upheld unanimously (8-0, with Commissioner Oren absent and Commissioner Duzuki recused; all present voted in favor). - Next steps: City council interviews scheduled for April 2, 2026 at 9:00 AM.

The San Antonio Board of Adjustments convened on March 23, 2026, at 10:01 AM and adjourned at 4:16 PM. The board heard 13 agenda items, including appeals of short-term rental (STR) permit revocations, special exceptions, and variances. A quorum of 11 members was present. Votes required 75% of total board (9 votes) to pass. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 4 (221 IRA Avenue): Three neighbors spoke in opposition to a special exception for an additional STR permit. Sandra Burge (220 IRA Avenue) cited nuisances (garbage cans, parking) and desired neighbors over transient businesses. Renee Ramirez cited street encroachment, safety concerns, and crime data. The neighborhood association (Menke Park) also opposed. - Item 5 (308 Keller Street): Hector Martinez (312 Keller Street) expressed concern about tenant vetting and noted one past noisy party, but otherwise had no issues. - Item 8 (154 Babcock Road): Bianca Maldonado (Monticello Park Neighborhood Association) spoke in support after the applicant met with the association, but noted barbed wire concerns. She also requested better staff engagement with neighborhood associations. - Item 9 (702 West Hollywood Avenue): Two recorded voicemails and Henry Krausey (private citizen) spoke in support of a front porch variance, citing neighborhood association support and compatibility with the NCD. - Item 10 (619 Barb Street): A voicemail from Sean Campbell (King William Association Board) registered opposition to a carport setback variance. Discussion Items - Item 1 – 8201 Meadow Post (STR appeal): Applicant Francis Inhesiaba reported paying penalties and resolving tenant issues. Staff noted two unreported stays (Dec 2024, Jan 2025). Board questioned responsibility for reporting. Motion to grant appeal passed 9–2. - Item 2 – 2110 Chitam Trail (STR appeal): Applicant Jeff Bryson explained identity theft, mailbox break-ins, and erroneous city information. He is current on HOT taxes. Motion to grant appeal passed 10–1. - Item 3 – 515 Belmont Street (STR appeal): Applicant Damien Norris cited confusion over Airbnb’s tax collection. He is now current. Board clarified reporting requirements. Motion to grant appeal passed 9–2. - Item 4 – 221 IRA Avenue (special exception): Applicant Tim Hendricks seeks second STR permit on block face (currently at 11% density, would exceed 12.5%). Staff recommended denial. Board continued to April 20, 2026, to allow applicant to meet with neighborhood association and verify financial records. - Item 5 – 308 Keller Street (STR appeal): Applicant Alejandra Plata explained missed filings due to communication breakdown. She is now current (paid all penalties). Motion to grant appeal passed 10–1. - Item 6 – 1828 Sacramento (STR appeal): Staff requested continuance to April 6, 2026, to review additional information. Applicant agreed. Motion to continue approved. - Item 7 – 510 Booker Alley (variance): Applicant Adriana Zega seeks variance for alley frontage. Fire marshal approved an administrative variance for fire sprinklers. Staff recommended approval. Motion to grant variance passed 11–0. - Item 8 – 154 Babcock Road (variance): Applicant Gustavo Samanielo seeks reduced setback for storage shed. Barbed wire issue removed from request. After meeting with neighborhood association, staff recommended approval. Motion to grant variance (15-foot rear setback, no barbed wire) passed 11–0. - Item 9 – 702 West Hollywood Avenue (variance): Applicant Jose Yamas seeks a front porch setback reduction from 20 ft to 11 ft 6 in. Neighborhood association supported. Staff recommended denial, but board voted to grant. Motion passed 11–0. - Item 10 – 619 Barb Street (variance): Applicant Deborah Rain seeks carport setback reduction. King William Association opposed. Board continued to April 20, 2026, to allow dialogue with neighborhood. - Item 11 – 5818 Gillis Drive (variance): Applicant Robert Gonzalez built a carport without permit. Seven neighbors supported. Staff recommended denial. Motion to grant variance passed 11–0. - Item 12 – 10515 Jones Maltzburger Road (variance): Applicant Josh Lieberman seeks buffer reduction to save a heritage oak. No opposition. Staff recommended denial. Motion to grant variance passed 11–0. - Item 13 – 1204 Delaware Street (variance): Applicant Ricardo Sanchez seeks rear setback reduction (from 10 ft to 5 ft). Structure existed for over a decade. Staff recommended approval. Motion to grant variance (5-foot rear setback) passed 11–0. Key Outcomes - Appeals granted: Items 1, 2, 3, 5 (STR permits reinstated). - Appeals continued: Items 4 and 10 to April 20, 2026; Item 6 to April 6, 2026. - Variances granted: Items 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13. - Minutes from previous meeting approved. - Director's report: Reminder that last voicemail was heard; financial reports due April 1, 2026.

The San Antonio Board of Adjustment met on March 23, 2026, to hear 13 agenda items, including appeals of short-term rental (STR) permit revocations and variance requests for property improvements. The board granted relief in most cases, often finding that city staff made procedural errors in revocations or that unique property conditions warranted variances. Several discussions highlighted ongoing confusion among STR operators about reporting hotel occupancy taxes separately to the city and county. Consent Calendar - The board approved the minutes of the previous meeting by voice vote. Public Comments & Testimony - Agenda Item 4 (221 1st Avenue): Two neighbors (Sandra Birch and René Ramírez) spoke in opposition to a requested STR variance. Birch stated she lives directly across the street and complained of trash bins blocking her driveway, guest parking issues, and a general desire for neighbors over businesses. Ramírez expressed concerns about street narrowing, overgrown trees, fire access, a concrete block wall, and crime risks from short-term rentals. - Agenda Item 5 (308 Keller Street): Neighbor Héctor Martínez expressed concern about the property being a rental, asking that guests be properly screened to avoid crime and noise. He noted one instance of a late-night party but otherwise described the property as well-maintained. - Agenda Item 8 (154 Babcock Road): Bianca Maldonado, president of the Monticello Neighborhood Association, spoke in support of a variance after the applicant met with the association and addressed their concerns. She opposed a barbed-wire fence that was part of the original request. - Agenda Item 9 (702 West Hollywood Avenue): Henry Krause, a resident of Beacon Hill, spoke as a private citizen in support of a variance for a porch, praising the applicant's design and the neighborhood association's support. - Agenda Item 10 (619 Barb Street): Sean Campbell, vice president of the King William Neighborhood Association, left a voicemail asking the board to postpone the item so the applicant could meet with the association. - Agenda Item 11 (5818 Gillis Drive): Seven letters of support from neighbors were submitted for a variance for a carport; no opposition was voiced. Discussion Items - Agenda Item 1 (8201 Middle Post) – STR Permit Revocation Appeal: The applicant, Francis Eva (manager of the owning LLC), stated he had paid all fines and taxes owed, but blamed the revocation on a lack of communication with his former tenant/operator. City staff reported that the property had active listings in December 2025 and that hotel occupancy taxes were still owed in some states. Commissioners questioned whether the owner or operator was responsible for reporting income and paying taxes. The owner claimed he had not received proper notices due to his name being incorrect on city correspondence. - Agenda Item 2 (2110 Cheatham Trail) – STR Permit Revocation Appeal: The applicant, Jeff Bryson, explained that he had been a victim of identity theft and mailbox theft, causing him to miss city notices. He stated he had paid all hotel occupancy taxes and had no code violations. City staff confirmed the property was current on taxes. - Agenda Item 3 (515 Belmont Street) – STR Permit Revocation Appeal: The applicant, Diamond Norris, stated he thought Airbnb was automatically collecting and remitting all taxes. He admitted he had not been filing monthly reports on the city's Avenue portal. Commissioners clarified that even when platforms collect city hotel taxes, operators must still report their gross income monthly to calculate county taxes. Norris had paid the most recent taxes but had not filed reports for January and February 2026. - Agenda Item 4 (221 1st Avenue) – STR Type 2 Exception: The owner, Tim Hendrix, sought a variance to allow a second STR on a lot where only one was permitted under the 12.5% cap. He claimed he had been operating both units for about five years under a single permit, paying taxes for both, and only learned a separate permit was needed in December 2025. City staff noted the block already had one active STR, and adding a second would exceed the cap. The item was postponed to allow the owner to meet with the opposing neighborhood association. - Agenda Item 5 (308 Keller Street) – STR Permit Revocation Appeal: The operator, Alejandra Plata, acknowledged a lapse in tax payments due to miscommunication with the property owner and a period of low demand. She stated all outstanding taxes had been paid. City staff confirmed the property was current but noted a one-year gap in reporting (February 2025 and February 2026). - Agenda Item 6 (1828 Sacramento) – STR Permit Revocation Appeal: The applicant requested a continuance to April 6, 2026, to allow time for review of additional information. No opposition was voiced, and the board granted the postponement. - Agenda Item 7 (510 Booker Alley) – Variance for Alley Access: The applicant, represented by Adriana Siga of SIGA Architecture Studio PLLC, requested a variance to allow a single-family home to have its principal frontage on an alley (Booker Alley) rather than a public street. The lot has no street frontage. The fire marshal had granted an administrative variance requiring a sprinkler system. Commissioner Orta noted potential code conflicts but did not object to voting. No public comments were heard. - Agenda Item 8 (154 Babcock Road) – Variance for Accessory Structure Setback: The applicant, Gustavo Sabaniego (via representative), sought a variance to place a storage shed 15 feet from the rear property line (after originally requesting less). The Monticello Neighborhood Association had expressed concerns about fire access and a barbed-wire fence. After meeting with the association, the applicant removed the barbed-wire fence from the plan. The association's president spoke in support of the revised request. - Agenda Item 9 (702 West Hollywood Avenue) – Variance for Front Porch Setback (NCD): The applicant, contractor José Llamas, requested a variance of 8 feet 4 inches (to reduce the required 20-foot front setback to 11 feet 6 inches) to build a front porch on a home in the Beacon Hill Neighborhood Conservation District. The neighborhood association voted to support the request. Two voicemails from neighbors also expressed support. The porch design had been reviewed by the Historic Design Review Commission. - Agenda Item 10 (619 Barb Street) – Variance for Carport Side Setback: The applicant sought a variance of 4 feet 11 inches (to allow a carport 1 inch from the side property line). The King William Neighborhood Association left a voicemail opposing the request. The board postponed the item to April 20, 2026, to allow the applicant to meet with the association. - Agenda Item 11 (5818 Gillis Drive) – Variance for Carport Front Setback: The owner, Robert González, requested a variance of 4 feet to allow a carport 6 feet from the front property line (required 10 feet). The carport was built without a permit two years ago due to hailstorm damage. Seven neighbors submitted letters of support. No opposition was received. - Agenda Item 12 (15015 Jones Maltsberger) – Variance for Landscape Buffer: The applicant, Velocity Broker, requested a variance of 11 feet (to reduce a required 15-foot landscape buffer to 4 feet) for a commercial development. The applicant proposed to save an existing tree and improve the buffer from current conditions. The neighborhood association had no objection. - Agenda Item 13 (1204 Delaware Street) – Variance for Rear Setback: The applicant, Ricardo Sánchez, sought a variance of 7 feet (to allow a rear setback of 3 feet, later clarified to 5 feet per survey) for an accessory structure. A previous owner had applied and been denied a similar variance in 2024. The structure had existed in the same location for over a decade. The rear neighbor's lot is currently vacant. No opposition was received. Key Outcomes - Agenda Item 1: Motion to grant appeal passed 9–2. Commissioners Dean and Mena voted no. The property was allowed to retain its STR permit. - Agenda Item 2: Motion to grant appeal passed 10–1. Commissioner Dean voted no. - Agenda Item 3: Motion to grant appeal passed 10–1. Commissioner Dean voted no. - Agenda Item 4: Motion to postpone to April 20, 2026, passed by voice vote. The owner was directed to meet with the neighborhood association. - Agenda Item 5: Motion to grant appeal passed 10–1. Commissioner Dean voted no. - Agenda Item 6: Motion to postpone to April 6, 2026, passed by voice vote. - Agenda Item 7: Motion to grant variance passed 11–0. - Agenda Item 8: Motion to grant variance (excluding barbed-wire fence) passed 11–0. - Agenda Item 9: Motion to grant variance passed 11–0. - Agenda Item 10: Motion to postpone to April 20, 2026, passed by voice vote. - Agenda Item 11: Motion to grant variance passed 11–0. Carport set back 6 feet from front property line. - Agenda Item 12: Motion to grant variance passed 11–0. Landscape buffer reduced from 15 feet to 4 feet. - Agenda Item 13: Motion to grant variance (amended to 5-foot rear setback) passed 11–0. Accessory structure allowed to remain.

The Audit Committee of the City of San Antonio met on March 20, 2026, with President Villagrán presiding. The meeting was called to order at approximately 10:05 AM (time inferred from transcript end) and covered three substantive agenda items: a pre-solicitation for temporary staffing services, a pre-solicitation for library materials, and the presentation of the external audit results for fiscal year 2025. The meeting concluded at 11:05 AM. Consent Calendar - The minutes from the last meeting were approved unanimously. A motion was made, seconded, and passed with all in favor. Public Comments & Testimony - One member of the public, Carl, spoke about agenda item number four (audit). He expressed frustration with the city's internal controls, alleging that he had been a victim of over $12,000 in stolen property and that no investigation had taken place. He referenced 32 presentations he had submitted and claimed that 22 federal judges committed felonies against him. He also mentioned that he had experience working for the city in internal controls. No other public comments were made. Discussion Items 1. Pre-Solicitation: Temporary Staffing Services (Item 2) - Proposal: A request for proposals for temporary staffing services for various city departments. The contract is valued at up to $30 million over three years (approx. $6 million per year) with two optional one-year renewals. The current four vendors are all eligible to apply. - Presentation: René Frida, Director of Human Resources, provided the overview. Services include administrative, clerical, labor, and specialized positions (e.g., health, Metro Health, finance). The evaluation criteria include 40 points for experience and background, with no local or veteran preference because of the contract size. The RFP timeline: released April 13, pre-conference May 8, contract award expected July/August, city council consideration in September, with a target start date of September 22. - Discussion: Committee members raised questions about background check requirements (said to be handled case by case), the need for temporary labor in solid waste during peak seasons, the use of artificial intelligence to reduce staffing needs, and the impact if the full $6 million per year is not funded. The HR director noted that temporary staff numbers have dropped from 400 during COVID to 75 citywide. Departments pay for their own temporaries through their budgets. The committee emphasized the need to identify funding sources and ensure proper oversight. 2. Pre-Solicitation: Library Materials and Processing (Item 3) - Proposal: A request for proposals for printed materials (books in English, Spanish, and other languages) and cataloging/processing services for the San Antonio Public Library. The contract is valued at up to $24.6 million over five years (approx. $3.5 million annually). The current contract expires October 31. - Presentation: Dale McNeil, Assistant Library Director, presented. The library is seeking vendors to supply and process materials for the central library and all branches. Evaluation criteria include vendor qualifications and history. No local or veteran preference applies due to the service scale. - Discussion: Committee members asked about the balance of print vs. digital materials. McNeil reported that usage is roughly 50% print, 50% digital. Digital materials are more expensive for the library than print. The library is actively engaged in marketing and community outreach, including partnerships with Texas Parks and Wildlife, to increase usage. There are approximately 250,000 library cardholders. The library is monitoring declines in print usage and adapting strategies. 3. External Audit Results for Fiscal Year 2025 (Item 4) - Presentation: Vickie Rabio (Deputy Controller) and Amanda Eves (external auditor from a firm) presented the audit findings. The audit is required by the city charter and a new state law requiring completion within 180 days of the fiscal year end to avoid property tax rate adoption restrictions. The audit covered the city's financial statements, federal and state grants, and FAA requirements for the FPMC program. - Key Results: The city received a clean (unmodified) opinion with no material weaknesses, no significant deficiencies, and no audit adjustments. This marks the eighth consecutive year without any findings. The auditors noted that the city's accounting policies were normal and no unusual transactions were identified. - Discussion: Committee members asked what a "clean" opinion means—it confirms that the financial statements are fairly presented in accordance with GAAP, not an assessment of the city's overall financial health. The committee also discussed future accounting standards (GASB changes expected in 2027) and the potential use of AI in financial processes, though AI is not currently used in city accounting. City Manager Troy expressed pride in the finance team, noting that the team worked long hours to meet the tight deadline. The committee praised the teamwork across departments and the city's strong bond ratings (Double-A-plus). Key Outcomes - No votes were taken on the pre-solicitations; both items were informational only and will come back for formal action after the evaluation process. - The external audit report was accepted as presented. - The next Audit Committee meeting was scheduled for April 1, 2026. Committee members requested that the agenda package be sent at least one week in advance. - The meeting adjourned at 11:05 AM.

The Audit Committee of the San Antonio City Council met on March 20, 2026, at 10:01 a.m. The meeting included approval of previous minutes, public comment, pre-solicitation briefings for temporary labor and library materials, and a presentation on the FY 2025 external audit results. The committee received updates on upcoming procurement timelines and celebrated the eighth consecutive year of no internal control findings. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: The minutes from the previous meeting were approved unanimously by voice vote. Public Comments & Testimony - Carl Merkel: Delivered his 32nd speech to the council. He criticized the city's internal controls regarding compliance with laws and regulations, citing his own experience with 12,500 in stolen property allegedly in city possession. He made allegations about the lack of internal controls in the U.S. judicial system, asserting that 22 federal judges committed felonies against him. - Chair View Garan: Took a point of personal privilege to remind attendees that March is Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month and urged everyone to schedule a colonoscopy. Pre-Solicitation Briefings Item 2: Temporary Labor Personnel Services - Presenter: Renee Frieda, Director of Human Resources. - Scope: Solicitation for multiple contracts to provide temporary personnel for clerical, general labor, and specialized roles (e.g., Metro Health, human services, finance). - Estimated Value: 6 million per year, 30 million total over a 3-year base term (plus two 1-year renewals). - Current Spending: Year-to-date spending is 945,000; projected annual spend is up to 3.9 million. - Vendor Pool: Current contract has four vendors; new RFP allows multiple awards. - Evaluation Criteria: Experience (40 pts), proposed plan (30 pts), pricing (20 pts), SBE Prime Contract Program (10 pts). - Timeline: RFP release April 13, 2026; contract target start December 22, 2026. - Discussion Highlights: - Chair Garan raised the need for background checks and asked if vendors would accommodate second-chance hiring. Renee confirmed the city has second-chance initiatives and expects vendors to apply similar standards. - Councilman White questioned the increase from current spending to 6 million annually. Renee explained that the contract amount must anticipate unforeseen needs (e.g., pandemic peak of 450 temps) and noted that over 20 million of the prior 35 million was grant-funded. - Councilman White asked about AI alternatives to temporary labor. Staff indicated an AI policy update is scheduled for June 2026. - Committee Member Trisha asked about vendor criteria. Renee highlighted vetting, comparable wages, and benefits as factors. - Trisha also asked about building bench strength to reduce temp reliance. Renee confirmed that internal special assignments and backfilling are used. Item 3: Library Print Materials, Cataloging, and Processing - Presenter: Dale McNeill, Assistant Director of the San Antonio Public Library. - Scope: Up to six contracts for print materials (primarily books in English and Spanish), cataloging, and processing services. - Estimated Value: 3.5 million annually, 24.5 million total over a 5-year base term (plus two 1-year renewals). - Background: The previous major vendor, Baker & Taylor (125 years in business), went out of business with no notice. The city has used an interim contract with Ingram Library Services since November 2025. - Evaluation Criteria: Experience (25 pts), proposed plan (55 pts), pricing (20 pts). - Timeline: RFP release April 10, 2026; council consideration September 2026. - Discussion Highlights: - Councilman White asked about the impact of digital resources. Dale noted that print demand has declined, and usage is roughly 50/50 print vs. electronic. He explained the higher cost of ebooks for libraries (e.g., up to 100 for a title). - Committee Member Trisha asked about library card penetration. Dale reported approximately 250,000 cardholders and mentioned outreach strategies, including door hangers with solid waste collections. - Chair Garan affirmed that the library continues to provide quality service and noted the importance of adapting to the economic climate. Discussion Items Item 4: FY 2025 External Financial Audit Results - Presenters: Victoria Rader, Deputy Finance Director, and Amanda Eves, Partner at Forvis Mazars (external auditors). - Key Results: The city received an unmodified (clean) opinion on its financial statements for the eighth consecutive year. No material weaknesses, significant deficiencies, or proposed audit adjustments were identified. The single audit for federal and state grants also had no compliance findings. - Background: The audit covers the city's financial statements and ensures compliance with state and federal grant requirements. A new Texas law (SB 1851) requires the audit to be completed within 180 days of fiscal year end; noncompliance could cap the property tax rate. - Deliverables: Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR), Single Audit Report, and other reports available on the city's transparency website. - Discussion Highlights: - Committee Member Trisha asked for clarification on "unmodified clean opinion." Amanda explained it means financial statements are properly stated per GAAP with no additional explanatory paragraphs. - Councilman White asked what a "true and fair view" means. Victoria clarified it confirms the accuracy of the numbers, not an assessment of the city's financial health. - Councilman White inquired about the use of AI and automation in finance. Victoria stated the city is not currently using AI for financial reporting, but plans to explore it during the SAP upgrade (S4 HANA and Ariba) later in 2026. - Chair Garan and other members commended the finance team and city leadership for achieving eight consecutive years of clean audits and no proposed adjustments. Key Outcomes - The committee accepted the FY 2025 external audit report and related communications as briefings. - The next audit committee meeting, originally scheduled for April 1, 2026, will be rescheduled for the week of April 13, 2026, to allow additional time for procurement preparations. - Staff will ensure meeting packets are distributed one week in advance, following the departure of prior administrative staff. - The meeting adjourned at 11:05 a.m.

The Compliance and Technical Advisory Board (CTAB) met on Friday, March 20, 2026, to consider four consent agenda items and four regular agenda items involving certificates of appropriateness for properties in historic districts. The board heard from applicants, staff, and one voicemail from a neighborhood representative. Key decisions included approvals with conditions on fencing and planters, denial of several replacement items for a violation case, approval of a 4-foot fence, a partial approval for window replacements, and a continuance for a siding case. Consent Calendar - Approval of Meeting Minutes (February 20, 2026): Motion carried with one abstention (Commissioner Speeds not present at previous meeting). - Item 1 (1119 North Pine), Item 2 (931 Hays), Item 3 (332 Florida), Item 4 (415 Willow): Approved unanimously after no commissioner pulled any items. A voicemail from Lulu Francois, Chair of the Decanwitting Hill Historic Neighborhood Review Committee, requested that the applicant at 415 Willow be required to install historically correct one-over-one windows (not part of current application but raised as a concern). The consent agenda as approved included all four items. Public Comments & Testimony - No in-person public comments were made. - A voicemail for consent item 4 (415 Willow) was played from Lulu Francois expressing concern that windows installed in 2020 did not meet historic guidelines and requesting the applicant return for review of windows. Discussion Items - Item 5 – 601 Burnett (Fence, Retaining Wall, Planters): Applicant Mr. Amons requested approval for a 3-foot 2-inch black rod iron front fence, a 1-foot limestone retaining wall, and limestone planters adjacent to the south and west facades. Staff recommended approval of items 1 and 2, but not item 3, citing moisture concerns. The applicant explained the planters would include drainage and foundation grading to prevent moisture. After discussion, the board approved items 1 and 2 as submitted, and approved item 3 with conditions: the planter height not to exceed the current height adjacent to the stair, and installation of weep holes and a plastic barrier to protect the skirting. - Item 6 – 115 East Carolina Street (Violation Case – Roof, Door, Windows, Screens): Applicants Octavio and Adriana Castrita explained they had replaced their porch roof, front door, windows, and screens after a tree fell on the property, unaware of the historic district requirements. Staff recommended denial of all four items with alternative recommendations (standing seam metal roof, wood screen frames, wood windows, more appropriate door). The board accepted staff recommendations unanimously, with Commissioner Sepulveda voting nay. The applicants were instructed to work with staff on compliant replacements. - Item 7 – 424 Burlitzon Street (Fence): Applicant Sarah Jones (online) requested a 5-foot-tall black metal fence for safety reasons, citing theft, vandalism, and a neighbor’s retaining wall that would reduce the effectiveness of a 4-foot fence. Staff recommended approval only if the fence did not exceed 4 feet. Commissioners noted that other 5-foot fences may exist in the area but were likely approved under different circumstances. The motion to accept staff recommendation passed 6-1 (Commissioner Davis nay). - Item 8 – 2129 West Mulberry Avenue (Window Replacement): Homeowner Stella Diaz and contractor requested replacement of 10 historic wood windows with an aluminum-clad wood product (Pella Reserve). Staff recommended replacement of only three windows (20D, 20E, 25) with a full wood product, and repair of the remaining seven. The applicant argued that many windows were beyond repair and that the product was used at a nearby school. Discussion focused on the condition assessment and guidelines. The board voted unanimously to accept staff recommendation, specifying full wood replacement for the three approved windows. - Item 9 – 1415 West Rosewood Avenue (Siding Replacement): Homeowner Erica Russell and contractor Michael Spartan requested approval to install fiber cement siding (HardiePlank) over the existing original wood siding, which is covered by vinyl. Staff recommended exposing the original siding to determine condition and repairing with in-kind wood; fiber cement was not recommended without further evidence. The applicant expressed concern about weather exposure and delays if vinyl were removed. Commissioners agreed more information was needed. The board voted unanimously to continue the case to the next meeting (April 17, 2026) and directed the applicant to work with staff in the interim to explore exploratory removal and administrative resolution. Key Outcomes - Consent Calendar (Items 1-4): Approved. - Item 5 (601 Burnett): Approved with conditions – fence and retaining wall as proposed; planters approved with height cap and moisture protection measures. Motion carried unanimously. - Item 6 (115 East Carolina): Denied as proposed; staff recommendations accepted. Motion carried 6-1. - Item 7 (424 Burlitzon): Approved with stipulation that fence height not exceed 4 feet. Motion carried 6-1. - Item 8 (2129 West Mulberry): Approved – three windows to be replaced with full wood product; remaining seven to be repaired with option for replacement if rot exceeds 50%. Motion carried unanimously. - Item 9 (1415 West Rosewood): Continued to the April 17, 2026 meeting; applicant to work with staff on exploratory removal and potential administrative approval. Motion carried unanimously.

The Technical Advisory and Historical Compliance Board (Junta de Asesoramiento Técnico y de Cumplimiento Histórico) met on March 20, 2026, at 9:00 AM. The vice president chaired as interim president. Quorum was present. The meeting addressed consent items, public comments, and four case-specific requests for Certificates of Appropriateness (COA) in historic districts. Consent Calendar - Approved minutes from February 20, 2022 (as stated in the transcript) by a vote of 7-0 (Davis, Regard, Speller, Fullerton, Pollock, Vázquez, Sepúlveda; Spitz abstained due to absence at that meeting). - Four consent agenda items at addresses 1119 North Pine, 231 Hays, 332 Florida Street, and 415 Willow were approved unanimously. Permits will be issued within ten days. Public Comments & Testimony - Lulu Francois, president of the Dignity Review Colonist Association, spoke on consent item 4 (415 Willow). She expressed concern that window replacements were not one-to-one with historic originals and requested that the applicant return to install correct historic windows. She also noted concerns about a fence but wanted to use the opportunity to address windows. Discussion Items Case 2026-xxx (115 East Carolina): Applicant requested a COA to modify the porch (install metal roof with 1-inch panels, smooth galvanized finish), replace front door and window with fiberglass, and replace all windows one-to-one with aluminum products. Staff recommended approval of the porch modifications and door replacement (with an appropriate door to be determined), but did not recommend the window replacement, citing historic guidelines. Applicants Octavio and Adriana Castruita explained that a tree fall damaged the porch and windows, and they chose replacements similar to those within two blocks. Commissioners noted the property is in the La Vaca historic district and that the proposed windows did not meet guidelines. The motion to accept staff recommendations passed 6-1 (Sepúlveda dissenting). Case 2026-043 (4 Burlington Street): Applicant Sarah Jones sought a COA for a 5-foot tall black metal fence with a gate at the sidewalk, citing security concerns (vandalism, break-ins, animal attacks). Staff recommended approval at 4 feet per guidelines. Jones argued that neighbors in the district have 5- or 6-foot fences. Commissioners noted that such fences may be violations or approved via appeal. The motion to accept staff recommendations (4 feet) passed 7-0. Case 2021-029 (29 Smallberry Avenue): Applicant Estela Díaz and contractor Christian Thomas (Pela) requested a COA to replace 10 historic windows with aluminum one-to-one. Staff recommended replacement of windows 20D, 20E, and 25 with full wood products; repair of the remaining windows with the option to replace if more than 50% deterioration is found during repair. Díaz argued that the front windows (10A, 10B) are deteriorated, difficult to open, and cause high energy bills and security risks. Thomas stated that Pela's product is high-quality and widely used in historic buildings. Commissioners emphasized the historic guidelines requiring wood windows and suggested working with historic window specialists. The motion to accept staff recommendations passed 7-0. Case 2026-051 (1415 West Rosewood Avenue): Applicant Erika Russell and contractor Michael Sparken requested a COA to install fiber cement siding (Hardy Plank) over original wood siding. Staff recommended denial, requiring repair of existing siding. Russell noted the original wood is deteriorated under vinyl siding placed by a previous owner. She removed a section of vinyl revealing rotted wood. Commissioners stated that the condition and profile of the original wood siding are unknown and that fiber cement does not meet historic guidelines for replacement with wood. After discussion, a motion to postpone the case to the next meeting (April 17, 2026) to allow the applicant to work with staff on exploration and possible administrative resolution passed 7-0. Key Outcomes - Minutes and four consent agenda items approved unanimously. - Case 115 East Carolina: Approved per staff recommendations (porch and door with conditions; windows not approved; applicant to coordinate with staff). Vote 6-1. - Case 4 Burlington Street: Approved at 4-foot fence height per staff recommendation. Vote 7-0. - Case 29 Smallberry Avenue: Approved per staff recommendations (three windows replaced with wood; others repaired with potential replacement if 50% deteriorated). Vote 7-0. - Case 1415 West Rosewood Avenue: Postponed to April 17, 2026, for further exploration and possible administrative resolution. Vote 7-0. - All applicants were instructed to work with staff for next steps.

The San Antonio City Council held a zoning and land use session on March 19, 2026, starting at 2:07 PM. The meeting included postponements, a consent calendar, and individual hearings on several zoning requests. Public comment was heard from Jack Finger, who opposed multiple items, and from applicants supporting their proposals. The council voted to approve all individual items after discussion. Consent Calendar - The council approved a consent calendar that included several zoning items not individually discussed. The specific items were not enumerated in the transcript, but the motion passed without objection. Public Comments & Testimony - Jack Finger (frequent public commenter) spoke on multiple agenda items: - Opposed item 16 (zoning change from residential to multifamily) citing flooding concerns and lack of buffering between residential and industrial uses. - Opposed item 2 (alcohol variance near Laclan Elementary) due to proximity to schools. - Opposed items 8 and 9 (zoning change from residential to commercial on Rich Avenue) arguing it would encroach on single-family homes. - Opposed item 7 (industrial to IDZ) because 27% of notified residents opposed (exceeding the 5% threshold) and the neighborhood association opposed it. - Opposed items 3 and 4 (IDZ2 allowing five units where maximum is four) stating staff recommended denial and the area was inappropriate. - Opposed items 10 and 11 (commercial to residential parking lot) citing no buffering and traffic concerns. - Opposed items 14 and 15 (commercial medical clinic on West Hart Avenue) due to traffic, noise, and lack of buffering. - Opposed items 17 and 18 (mobile homes on West Military Drive) arguing staff recommended denial due to lack of industrial buffering. - Opposed item 20 (parking for food trucks on Watkins Lane) as inconsistent with land use. - Applicant for items 3 and 4 (owner of property at 201) spoke in favor, stating the zoning correction was needed and that the Tobin Hill community supported the change. He noted the Zoning Commission approved the request unanimously. - For items 14 and 15, Councilmember Castillo acknowledged the Gonzalva (Gonzalez) family for commitments to provide additional parking, maintain cleanliness, and communicate with the neighborhood. Discussion Items - Items 3 and 4 (201 and Tobin Hill): Amendment to the downtown plan for mixed-use IDZ2 to allow five units. Staff recommended denial, but the Zoning Commission approved. Councilmember Carr's district. The applicant spoke. The council voted to approve. - Items 10 and 11 (904 Placenta Road and 347 Cedars Avenue): Change from residential low-density to commercial and reunify property for nine parking spaces requiring demolition. Staff recommended denial for the first location and approval for the second. Councilmember Villagrán spoke in favor, noting the applicant met with her. Motion to approve passed. - Items 14 and 15 (206 West Hart Avenue): Change from residential low-density to neighborhood commercial with specific use for a medical clinic. Staff recommended denial, Zoning Commission approved. Councilmember Castillo spoke in favor, citing commitments from the applicant. Motion to approve passed. - Items 17 and 18 (77439 West Military Drive): Amendment to master plan for mixed-use center, changing from C3 to C3-CD with conditional use for manufactured homes and sales. Staff recommended denial, Planning Commission approved. Condition: no temporary signage. Councilmember Galván moved to approve, noting community support. Passed. - Item 19 (6464 Highway): Zoning change from C3 to AC12D for truck repair and maintenance, with condition of no signage. Councilmember Galván moved to approve. Passed. - Item 20 (1403 Watkins Lane): Zoning change from R5 to R5-CD with conditional use for parking. Staff recommended approval. Councilmember (acting for Alderete Gavito) moved to approve, noting support from Culebra Park Neighborhood Association. Passed. Key Outcomes - Postponements: Item 2 (alcohol variance) postponed to April 2, 2026; Items 8 and 9 (commercial zoning on Rich Avenue) postponed to April 16, 2026. - Consent calendar approved without objection. - All individual items (3,4,10,11,14,15,17,18,19,20) were approved by voice vote. - The meeting adjourned at 2:36 PM.

The San Antonio City Council convened at 9:18 AM on Thursday, March 19, 2026, with Mayor Pro Tem Mickey Rodriguez presiding. The meeting included opening prayer, pledge of allegiance, approval of previous minutes, multiple proclamations, recognition of deceased community members, a city manager's report, public comment, and an executive session. Consent Calendar - Minutes from February 23, February 27, March 4, and March 5 were approved unanimously. - Several items were pulled from the consent agenda for individual discussion: item 6 (eminent domain/condemnation), item 8 (Maverick Creek Greenway trail construction), item 19 (partnership with independent school district for pool access), item 20 (lease agreement with Field Harbor Park Conservancy), item 21 (HIV grant funding), item 27 (reappointment of George Grimes to a board), item 28 (reappointment of Margaret Wilson Angalia to Port Authority), item 29 (appointment of Brian Benavides to Multimodal Transportation Commission), and item 30 (appointment of Lorena Havil to Animal Care Services board). All consent items, including those pulled, were approved by unanimous vote. Public Comments & Testimony - Hershey Boyd (speaking on agenda item 6) condemned the city's use of eminent domain, stating that the city took his property and ruined his life. He called for a change in the law and asked the council to slow down the process and investigate. He argued that corporations receive properties taken from citizens and that this is unfair. Discussion Items - Proclamation – Persian New Year (Norooz): The council proclaimed March 26, 2026, as Persian New Year. A representative from the Iranian community accepted the proclamation, noting the 300 million celebrants worldwide and the sobering context of war and oppression in Iran. He emphasized Norooz as a symbol of cultural heritage, peace, and solidarity. - Proclamation – Theatre in the City Month: March was proclaimed Theatre Month in San Antonio. Aiden Wilfield, Vice President of TAF Drama Troop, thanked the council and highlighted the importance of theatre for student belonging and academic achievement. Councilmember Galván and Villagrán expressed support for funding the arts. - Points of Privilege: - Councilmember (District 2) recognized Mia Morris, a member of the Martin Luther King Commission who recently passed away. Her family members spoke, thanking the council for honoring her legacy of community service. - Councilmember Galván (District 6) recognized two deceased community members: Bert McGill (30-year Air Force veteran, community advocate) and Edith Green (longtime volunteer and advocate for education and improvements). He shared memories of their dedication. - Councilmember Villagrán invited all to a Women's History Month 5K walk/run in District 3 on March 22, 2026, with a health fair and empowerment zone. - City Manager's Report: - Highlighted a mural featured in the city's magazine, part of a bond project, and noted the upcoming Texas Rate conference in San Antonio. - Announced that airport construction will begin a new phase on March 23, 2026, with temporary lane closures and a transition to the new Terminal C. Travelers are advised to arrive early. - Presented a video showcasing two employees, Rebeca Valdés (5 years with the city) and Shamika (supervisor, started in January 2026), highlighting their community outreach and connection to residents. - Councilmember Remarks on Consent Agenda Items: - Councilmember (District 4) supported item 6, noting work on a long-term transportation solution. - Councilmember Munguía highlighted items related to 4% tax credits for housing and changes to the tax increment financing program. - Councilmember Castillo noted items 19 (school-pool partnership) and 21 (HIV grants, high prevalence in District 5). - Councilmember Mesa González supported item 8 (Maverick Creek Greenway) and item 20 (Field Harbor Park lease with Conservancy). - Councilmember White supported item 7 (contracts for bike and pedestrian improvements). - Councilmember (District 2) supported reappointments and appointments (items 27-30), noting George Grimes' compassion, Margaret Wilson Angalia as first African American female president of Port Authority, Brian Benavides' bicycle tourism perspective, and Lorena Havil's animal care volunteerism. Key Outcomes - Approved the minutes of February 23, February 27, March 4, and March 5. - Approved the entire consent agenda, including items pulled for discussion, by unanimous vote. - The council entered executive session at 10:00 AM to discuss economic development negotiations, property acquisition/lease, and legal matters. No action was taken, and the session ended at 10:39 AM. - The meeting was adjourned at 10:39 AM.